Press Ctrl/Cmd + P to print
or save as PDF

0.5 Reader’s Guide

A) Confidence tiers — evidence strength at a glance

TierWhat you’ll seeEvidence basisTypical intervalSuitable forMinimum controls (standards)
A++ (Audited & Replicated)A++ badge beside metricIndependent replication by a second national/regional node and external audit opinionCI95 (frequentist) and CrI90 (Bayesian)Finance- and policy-grade KPIs[SR] signed runs (SLSA v1, in-toto/Sigstore); [2N] dual attestation; [REP] third-party rerun; [PROV] lineage (W3C PROV, DCAT 3); audit letter (ISAE 3000/AT-C 205)
A+ (Verified & Reproduced)A+Internal reproduction by an independent team; high completenessCI95 or BCa bootstrap; sensitivity tableQuarterly performance, adoption, SLA[SR], internal rerun; drift checks; [PROV] lineage present
A (Verified)APrimary sources + traceable transforms; reviewer checksCI90–95 / Wilson score (rates)Training hours, participation, accessibility[SR] or checksum manifest; reviewer sign-off; [PROV] minimal
B (Modelled/Estimated)BModel-based estimate; priors and assumptions disclosed in model cardCrI80–90; fan bandsReadiness shares, avoided-loss estimatesModel card (ISO/IEC 42001 / 23894 alignment); backtest fit; scenario definitions
C (Exploratory/Indicative)CEarly indicator, partial data, or scenario boundRange or scenario envelopeEmerging risks; horizon scansLimitations stated; no policy without uplift to A/B

Notes: CI = confidence interval; CrI = credible interval; BCa = bias-corrected & accelerated bootstrap.


B) Uncertainty taxonomy — what the bands and ranges mean

SourceDefinitionHow we display itTypical placement
Aleatoric (statistical noise)Random variability/measurement errorCI95, prediction intervals (PI90)Attendance, SLA timing, defect rates
Epistemic (knowledge/model limits)Uncertain parameters, sparse dataCrI90 with priors; fan chartsReadiness ratios, avoided-loss
Scenario/path dependenceDivergent futures given policy/climate/market paths50/80/95% fan bands; named scenariosFinance mobilisation; roll-out sequencing
Bias/coverageMissingness, selection, geospatial biasData-quality annotation; completeness noteEarly cohorts; language/access metrics
Operational/governanceLegal authority, consent, grievance efficacyAssurance icons (Section C)Activation readiness
Temporal driftDistribution shift vs baselineDrift flags; re-baselining markersML performance; index comparability

Prose discipline:

  • Observed = direct measurement.
  • Estimated = measurement ± model adjustment (interval required).
  • Modelled/Projected = scenario-based; read assumptions + fan bands.

C) Assurance icon set — professional, standards-mapped

Monochrome codes appear in square brackets; each is a binary control enforced via the Nexus Validation Machine (NVM).

IconLabelWhat it guaranteesCanonical standards/protocols referenced
[SR]Signed-RunCode, configs, environment, and data hashes signed and immutably recorded; artifact ID linkedSLSA v1.0, in-toto, Sigstore/cosign, build SBOM (SPDX 2.3 / CycloneDX 1.5), runtime attestation
[2N]Dual VerifyTwo independent national hosts attested the result; logs are tamper-evident; decisions reversibleZero-trust verification (NIST SP 800-207); append-only attest ledger
[REP]ReplicatedA distinct team re-ran with fresh pulls and reproduced within toleranceReproducible research checklist; container pinning; seed control
[DPIA]DPIA & ConsentDPIA on file; lawful basis and consent/withdrawal paths operationalGDPR, ISO/IEC 27701, ISO/IEC 27560:2023 (consent records)
[ACC]AccessiblePublic touchpoints compliant with WCAG 2.2 AAW3C WCAG 2.2; ISO 30071-1
[CYS]Cyber SLASev-1 patch latency within target; SBOM & VEX (CSAF); change log currentNIST CSF 2.0; SP 800-53 r5; OWASP SAMM; CSA CCM
[SAFE]Safety CaseStructured argument with evidence approved; controlled rollback testedSafety-case method; ISO 31000, ISO 22301; change-control (ITIL/ISO 20000)
[RED]Grievance/RedressIndependent office; ack ≤ 24h; median resolution ≤ 14 days; public reportingUNGPs effectiveness criteria; ISO 37002 (whistleblowing management)
[ETH]Ethics ReviewIndependent ethics board review completed; conditions trackedAI governance ISO/IEC 42001, human-subjects norms; do-no-harm
[PROV]ProvenanceEnd-to-end lineage recorded and publishedW3C PROV-O, DCAT v3, OpenLineage
[AUTH]AuthenticityContent and advisories have traceable provenance/signaturesC2PA (origin/provenance), CAdES/XAdES
[OBS]ObservabilityTelemetry, traces, logs linked to the metric/exhibitOpenTelemetry, CloudEvents 1.0

Rule of thumb: A++ metrics typically carry [SR][2N][REP][DPIA][PROV][AUTH]. Absence of [REP] usually downgrades to A+; absence of [2N] to A.


D) Intervals, fans, and construction methods

  • Proportions (e.g., NVM-ready share): Wilson CI95; show n and denominator.
  • Means/medians: Normal-approx CI95 with normality tests; if skewed, BCa bootstrap (≥10k resamples).
  • Forecasts: Bayesian posterior with CrI90; fan charts (50/80/95%); priors & likelihoods summarised in model cards; calibration published (reliability plots, Brier).
  • Prediction intervals: Where the “next observation” matters (e.g., time-to-brief), include PI90 alongside the point estimate.

Caption pattern used:
41% (CI95: 36–46; n=72) A+ [SR][2N][DPIA][PROV]


E) Data classes & reuse posture

ClassTypical sourcesRights & reuse
OpenEarth observation, hydromet, public budgets, admin boundariesOpen license; checksums + license posted; FAIR/CARE tags
Shared (Trusted)Health, education, utility data under data trustsAggregated/DP; fiduciary governance; DPIA; access logs
RestrictedSensitive ops, cyber logs, grievance narrativesOn-prem/enclave only; outputs via audit letter; retention policy
DerivedIndices/composites produced from multiple inputsFull lineage + weights; method notes; versioned schemas

Geo/EO conventions (where relevant): COG, Zarr, Parquet/Arrow; STAC 1.0 catalogs; OGC API – Features/Tiles/EDR.


F) Claims grammar — verbs and modals signal evidence strength

  • Observed → A++/A+ with [SR] (and typically [2N]).
  • Estimated → A/A+ with interval; [PROV] required.
  • Modelled/Projected → B with fan bands; model card cited.
  • Indicative → C with explicit limitations.

Modals map to tiers: “will” (A++/A+ + enforceable covenants), “likely” (A/B), “plausible” (C).


G) Calibration, drift, and re-baselining

  • Forecast calibration: reliability diagrams + Brier scores; quarterly targets ≤ 0.20 (binary triggers) and ≤ 0.15 (≤6-month horizons).
  • Drift: flagged when divergence (e.g., KL) exceeds thresholds; mitigation via re-training or feature roll-backs recorded in [OBS] telemetry.
  • Re-baselining: old vs new baselines co-displayed for two quarters; change log linked via [PROV].

H) Red-flag conditions & escalation protocol

A [WARN] tag is shown when a required control is missing:

  • Missing [SR] or [PROV] for a headline KPI
  • Missing [DPIA] where personal/operational data are processed
  • Missing [SAFE] for activation-claims exhibits
  • [RED] inoperative for community-affecting advisories

Escalation path: Exhibit Owner → National Node Lead → Regional Steward Board → Chief Steward—Assurance. Public management letters are posted to the Transparency Feed.


I) Reading examples

NVM-ready share (countries)
41% (CI95: 36–46; n=72) A+ [SR][2N][DPIA][PROV][AUTH]
Meaning: 41% of participating countries passed all NVM gates; strong verification and data-rights in place; 95% CI 36–46. Decision-grade.

Anticipatory-action readiness (modelled)
58% (CrI90: 49–66; fan 50/80/95%) B [ETH][PROV]
Meaning: Model-based estimate with ethics review; scenario-dependent; use for sequencing, not compliance.

Time-to-brief (operational)
2h 45m (PI90: 1h30–4h10) A [SR][CYS][OBS]
Meaning: Signed operational metric with cyber SLAs and observability; prediction interval anticipates next event variance.


J) Accessibility & publication conventions

  • Color-blind safe palettes; line styles (solid/dash/dot) differentiate bands in monochrome.
  • WCAG 2.2 AA conformance at national entry points; all figures include alt-text (≤120 chars) and methods notes.
  • Monospace icon codes ([SR][2N]…) print cleanly and survive photocopy/scan.