Lenses and readings

The global baseline is read through each steward’s lens, then once as a whole. Each lens is a projection of reviewed findings, not a separate argument.

10 min read0 figures6 tables37 notesNR-GLOBAL-SYSTEMS-2026-BASELINE

Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. ·Executive summary
  3. 1The world’s risk is entangled, not additive
  4. 2Key findings
  5. 3Systems and sectors at baseline
  6. 4Risks and capability
  7. 5Concurrent breadbasket shortfall and energy price shock
  8. 6Lenses and readings
    1. 6.1 Three lenses
    2. 6.2 GCRI reading: the model card
    3. 6.3 Global Risks Forum reading: editorial essays
    4. 6.4 Global Risks Alliance reading: 2027 global readiness pack
    5. 6.5 Nexus Standards reading: standards and regulatory watch
    6. 6.6 Risk Academy reading: literature and evidence review, science and assessments
  9. 7The 2027 agenda
  10. 8Systems in depth
  11. AMethodology
  12. BData appendix
  13. CReferences and record
  14. ·Complete edition, for print

6.1Three lenses

One edition, read by each steward. The lens of this site comes first.

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports an entangled reading of global risk. Warming and losses set records in the same years; frequency, not one peak event, drives losses; and the five core systems share dependence on water, energy and land. Evidence is strongest for climate and losses, and weakest for digital dependencies and tipping proximity.

CLI-001 · FIN-002 · CLI-010 · SYS-012

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people global risk arrives as a price rise, a heat wave or a flood, and its burden depends on where they live. The baseline asks that public debate weigh the couplings and the distribution of losses, not a list of separate threats.

FIN-003 · FOO-006 · HLT-008

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. About half of disaster losses are uninsured, debt service crowds out adaptation, and climate disclosure standards are spreading33. These show where finance-readiness evidence will matter. Nothing here is advice, a rating or an approval.

FIN-002 · FIN-003 · FIN-011

NEXUS

Synthesis

The global system is well observed and thinly protected. The 2027 programme should bind the couplings through federation evidence, test the breadbasket–energy pathway, and measure where uninsured losses land.

SYS-012 · G-01 · G-02

6.2GCRI reading: the model card

GCRI’s reading of this edition is its model card: what the national model is, what it computes and where it stops. It is printed in full in Annex A, with the methods it belongs to. Annex A, methodology

6.3Global Risks Forum reading: editorial essays

Four signed essays by the Reports editorial team set out the positions this edition takes. They are interpretation, labelled as such; the evidence they draw on is in the findings register.

In 2025 no major hurricane reached the United States mainland, and insured losses still passed US$100 billion for the sixth year running. Floods, hail, storms and wildfires, individually “medium”, now add up to totals that once required a single great catastrophe. Global resilience has to be measured against many events in close succession, not one event of record size.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 01

Medium events are the new catastrophe

About half of 2025’s disaster losses were uninsured, and almost nine-tenths in Asia. Where cover is thin, a flood becomes household debt and a fiscal shock, and recovery competes with interest payments. Closing the gap is less a question of insurance products than of fiscal space, data and risk reduction.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 02

The protection gap is a development gap

Data centres used about 415 TWh of electricity in 2024, and refining of the minerals behind batteries and chips is concentrated in very few places. The digital transition is also an energy, water and minerals transition, and its risks sit in substations, cooling towers and refineries as much as in software.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 03

Frontier technology is physical

A small number of regions grow most of the world’s traded grain. A season in which several of them fail together, more likely as the world warms, would travel through prices to every import-dependent household. The world tracks harvests one country at a time; the risk lives in their concurrence.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 04

Breadbaskets are a shared exposure

6.4Global Risks Alliance reading: 2027 global readiness pack

The registers that open the 2027 global cycle. At baseline each is initialised from this edition.

Table 6.12027 global readiness pack
ItemRegisterState at baselineFirst 2027 entry
E1Global risk state deltabaseline set by this editionchanges against the baseline
E2WEFH+B state deltafive global system readings setindicator updates and freshness
E3Agenda and Portfolio movementeight agenda items · seven proposed objectsadmission decisions
E4Federation delivery registerCanada issued; 85 editions in programmeregional and sector baselines
E5Consortium capability registernational consortia formingfirst contributions
E6Leadership questions and challengesnone yetfirst challenge log
E7Foundry technical statenational environments preparedfirst federation cut
E8Publication candidatestwelve findings carried forwardPUBLISH · HOLD dispositions
E9Universe readinessone candidate missionadmission and role spine
E10Correction registernonefirst federation-wide cycle

Publication dispositions

  • Publish
  • Hold
  • Needs evidence
  • Restricted
  • Superseded

6.5Nexus Standards reading: standards and regulatory watch

International instruments that shape the systems in this edition, by status on the retrieval date. The edition assesses no one’s compliance.

  • IN FORCE
  • ADOPTED
  • ADOPTED · OPEN FOR SIGNATURE
  • PUBLISHED · VOLUNTARY
Table 6.2Standards and regulatory watch
InstrumentBodyScopeStatusRelevance
Paris Agreement29UNFCCCglobalIN FORCEemissions, adaptation
Kunming-Montreal Framework30CBDglobalADOPTED 202230% by 2030
Sendai Framework 2015–203031UNDRRglobalADOPTED 2015disaster risk reduction
High Seas (BBNJ) Agreement32United Nationsocean beyond national jurisdictionADOPTED 2023marine biodiversity
International Health Regulations, 2024 amendments28WHOglobalADOPTED 2024pandemic preparedness
WHO Pandemic Agreement27WHOglobalADOPTED · OPEN FOR SIGNATUREprevention, access
IFRS S1 and S233ISSBjurisdictions adoptingPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYclimate disclosure
Regulation (EU) 2024/168934EUEuropean UnionIN FORCE · PHASEDAI governance

Changed since 2024

  • The World Health Assembly adopted the Pandemic Agreement in May 202527
  • Amendments to the International Health Regulations were adopted in 202428
  • Jurisdictions began adopting the ISSB climate disclosure standard33

To watch in 2027

  • Updated nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement29
  • Implementation of the High Seas Agreement32
  • National biodiversity strategies against the 2030 targets30

6.6Risk Academy reading: literature and evidence review, science and assessments

The review behind this edition covers global assessments, peer-reviewed science and the institutional reports that bind its findings. Systematic reviews for each agenda item begin in 2027.

Review protocol

Question
What does the published evidence establish about the world’s coupled water, energy, food, health and biodiversity risks?
Sources searched
global assessments; UN and multilateral statistics; peer-reviewed literature; industry loss data
Window
releases available at evidence close, 30 September 2026
Selection
sources that bind or contextualise a finding in this edition
Next step
systematic reviews for agenda items G-01 to G-06 in 2027
Table 6.3Assessments and peer-reviewed science
ReferenceTypeYearRoleUsed for
Lee and Romero (eds.)15assessment2023supportsforcing and risk
McElwee et al. (eds.)16assessment2024frameworknexus interlinkages
O’Brien et al. (eds.)17assessment2024contexttransformative change
Richardson et al.20journal article2023supportsplanetary boundaries
Rockström et al.47journal article2023frameworksafe and just boundaries
Lenton et al. (eds.)21report2023supportstipping systems
Zscheischler et al.22journal article2018frameworkcompound events
Gaupp et al.23journal article2020supportsbreadbasket risk
Lawrence et al.24journal article2024frameworkpolycrisis mechanisms
Romanello et al.26journal article2024supportsheat and health
Table 6.4Institutional flagships
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
State of the Global Climate141WMO2025–26supportstemperature, ocean heat
GAR 202518UNDRR2025supportsdisaster risk
Emissions and Adaptation Gap342UNEP2024supportsemissions, finance gap
Global Energy Review4IEA2025supportsenergy emissions
Table 6.5UN and multilateral statistics
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
SOFI 20257FAO and partners2025supportshunger
JMP 20238WHO · UNICEF2023supportswater and sanitation
World Population Prospects11UN DESA2024supportspopulation
Global Trends12UNHCR2025supportsdisplacement
A World of Debt13UNCTAD2025supportsdebt service
Air-quality fact sheets14WHO2024supportsair-pollution deaths
World Social Protection Report44ILO2024supportssocial protection
Table 6.6Industry, energy and nature data
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
NatCatSERVICE 20252Munich Re2026supportslosses
Global Electricity Review6Ember2025supportsclean power share
Energy and AI5IEA2025supportsdata-centre demand
Critical Minerals Outlook36IEA2025supportsrefining concentration
Living Planet Report9WWF2024supportswildlife trends
Protected Planet10UNEP-WCMC · IUCN2024supportsprotected areas

Where the evidence agrees

  • The world is warming at a historic rate, with record ocean heat115
  • Losses are rising in trend and driven by frequency across perils218
  • The five core systems are tightly interlinked16

Where it is unsettled

  • How close individual tipping systems are to their thresholds21
  • How often concurrent breadbasket failures will occur at each warming level23
  • How fast AI-driven electricity demand will grow5

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 33International Sustainability Standards Board (ed.), IFRS S1 General Requirements and IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures. IFRS Foundation, London, 2023.back
  2. 29UNFCCC (ed.), Paris Agreement. United Nations, Paris, 2015.back
  3. 30Convention on Biological Diversity (ed.), Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, Decision 15/4. CBD Secretariat, Montreal, 2022.back
  4. 31UNDRR (ed.), Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. UNDRR, Geneva, 2015.back
  5. 32United Nations (ed.), Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. United Nations, New York, 2023.back
  6. 28World Health Assembly (ed.), Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005), resolution WHA77.17. WHO, Geneva, June 2024.back
  7. 27World Health Assembly (ed.), WHO Pandemic Agreement, resolution WHA78.1. WHO, Geneva, May 2025.back
  8. 34European Parliament and Council of the European Union (eds.), Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal L, 12 July 2024, as amended.back
  9. 15H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.), Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. IPCC, Geneva, 2023.back
  10. 16P. D. McElwee, P. A. Harrison, T. L. van Huysen et al. (eds.), Thematic Assessment Report on the Interlinkages among Biodiversity, Water, Food and Health. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054back
  11. 17K. O’Brien, L. Garibaldi and A. Agrawal (eds.), Thematic Assessment Report on the Underlying Causes of Biodiversity Loss and the Determinants of Transformative Change. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, 2024.back
  12. 20K. Richardson, W. Steffen, W. Lucht et al., “Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries,” Science Advances, vol. 9, eadh2458, 2023.back
  13. 47J. Rockström, J. Gupta, D. Qin et al., “Safe and just Earth system boundaries,” Nature, vol. 619, pp. 102–111, 2023.back
  14. 21T. M. Lenton, D. I. Armstrong McKay, S. Loriani et al. (eds.), The Global Tipping Points Report 2023. University of Exeter, Exeter, 2023.back
  15. 22J. Zscheischler, S. Westra, B. J. J. M. van den Hurk et al., “Future climate risk from compound events,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 8, pp. 469–477, 2018.back
  16. 23F. Gaupp, J. Hall, S. Hochrainer-Stigler and S. Dadson, “Changing risks of simultaneous global breadbasket failure,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 10, pp. 54–57, 2020.back
  17. 24M. Lawrence, T. Homer-Dixon, S. Janzwood, J. Rockström, O. Renn and J. F. Donges, “Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement,” Global Sustainability, vol. 7, e6, 2024.back
  18. 26M. Romanello et al., “The 2024 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change,” The Lancet, vol. 404, pp. 1847–1896, 2024.back
  19. 1WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, WMO-No. 1391. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, March 2026.back
  20. 41WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2024, WMO-No. 1368. WMO, Geneva, 2025.back
  21. 18UNDRR (ed.), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025: Resilience Pays. UNDRR, Geneva, 2025.back
  22. 3UNEP (ed.), Emissions Gap Report 2024: No more hot air … please! UNEP, Nairobi, 2024.back
  23. 42UNEP (ed.), Adaptation Gap Report 2024: Come Hell and High Water. UNEP, Nairobi, 2024.back
  24. 4International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Energy Review 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  25. 7FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (eds.), The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025. FAO, Rome, 2025.back
  26. 8WHO and UNICEF (eds.), Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000–2022. Joint Monitoring Programme, New York and Geneva, 2023.back
  27. 11UN DESA Population Division (ed.), World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results. United Nations, New York, 2024.back
  28. 12UNHCR (ed.), Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2024. UNHCR, Copenhagen, June 2025.back
  29. 13UNCTAD (ed.), A World of Debt 2025: It Is Time for Reform. UNCTAD, Geneva, 2025.back
  30. 14World Health Organization (ed.), “Ambient (outdoor) air pollution” and “Household air pollution” fact sheets. WHO, Geneva, retrieved 2026-09-30.back
  31. 44International Labour Organization (ed.), World Social Protection Report 2024–26: Universal Social Protection for Climate Action and a Just Transition. ILO, Geneva, 2024.back
  32. 2Munich Re (ed.), Natural disasters in 2025: NatCatSERVICE full-year figures. Munich Re, Munich, January 2026.back
  33. 6Ember (ed.), Global Electricity Review 2025. Ember, London, 2025.back
  34. 5International Energy Agency (ed.), Energy and AI. World Energy Outlook Special Report. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  35. 36International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  36. 9WWF (ed.), Living Planet Report 2024: A System in Peril. WWF, Gland, 2024.back
  37. 10UNEP-WCMC and IUCN (eds.), Protected Planet Report 2024. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, Cambridge and Gland, 2024.back

Cite this chapter

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Chapter 6: Lenses and readings. In Global Systems Risk and Resilience Report 2026: The State of Interdependent Risk, Readiness and Frontier Change (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-GLOBAL-SYSTEMS-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Global Systems.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRIGlobal Systems Risk and Resilience
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Support our work

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.