GCRI · Cybersecurity and Digital Resilience

Data and technical methods

The public technical tools of Cybersecurity and Digital Resilience: the models and data behind them, how to reproduce a view and the uncertainty it carries.

01Workspace

The workspace for data and technical methods.

Pipeline

Data and technical methods · Workspace WS-52 · Example interface, not a record

One stage waitingGCRI · Cybersecurity and Digital Resilience

Stages

  1. Ingest5 sources
  2. Validateschema · licence
  3. Transformversioned
  4. ModelCybersecurity
  5. Testheld-out
  6. Releasewith limits

Artefacts

SIEM alertsv2.5To checkOBSERVED
Asset inventoryv4.5OpenPublished statistics
Vulnerability scansv4.7OpenOBSERVED
Supplier assessmentsv2.3OpenASSESSED

Compute quota

share used vs alert level

CPU hours35 used of 80 used limitStorage69 used of 90 used limitGPU hours11 used of 70 used limit
Pipeline.Illustrative interface; not live data.

Cybersecurity and Digital Resilience · Pipeline. Pipeline: example names and illustrative values, not a record.

02Tools

What is published here.

Maps

Released maps

Open the released maps

Models

Reviewed models and scenarios

Open the reviewed models

Scenarios

Sector scenarios

Open the sector scenarios

03Fitness for purpose

What every cyber tool should state about itself.

Cyber tools serve operators, regulators and insurers assessing systemic exposure. A specialist checks incident definitions, anonymisation and the dependency assumptions in accumulation scenarios. Tools rest on cybersecurity and network science and support the cloud and third parties and critical service cyber topics. Accumulation outputs are scenarios for planning, so they carry the share of affected organisations assumed and the recovery time used.

  • Incident definitions used.
  • Anonymisation applied.
  • Dependency assumptions in accumulation scenarios.
04Process

How the process runs.

Process explorer · Process

Data and technical methods: Layers to published map

7 steps4 stages1 gate

Process

Data and technical methods: Layers to published map

Layers enter with their rights, are aligned, analysed and checked for uncertainty, then released after public-safe review; a map is a governed spatial claim.

  1. 01 Data

    1. 01Source layers with their rightsDataset · NXS-GRX (canonical data, provenance and risk)Spatial views of The Global Risks Index (NXS-GRX) products sit under the boundary licence gate. Rights classification sets how a layer may be used.
  2. 02 Harmonise

    1. 02Coordinate reference and boundary versionRecord · NXS-EOP (earth observation and digital twins)The area of interest preserves its coordinate reference system, polygon validity and observation support. Boundary versions are kept.
    2. 03Harmonise units, variables and timeStepUnit metadata, conversion records and transformation logs are required. Alignment is an evidence event, not hidden preprocessing.
  3. 03 Analyse and check

    1. 04Analyse with a recorded processing recipeModel · GIS teamA processing recipe records parameters, calibration, inputs and output lineage. The analysis methods are named in each product's own record.
    2. 05Spatial uncertainty checkGateSpatial uncertainty is recorded and affects downstream use. A high-uncertainty polygon may suit internal review, not public-safe release.
  4. 04 Publish

    1. 06Spatial metadata bundleRecordThe bundle records boundary type, jurisdiction, geometry version, projection, resolution, source, time window, uncertainty and access class.
    2. 07Public-safe release of the mapDecisionThe output record names the redactions, uncertainty and public-safe reviewer. A map is a governed spatial claim, never merely a picture.

Spatio-temporal intelligence · Data protocols: semantic, jurisdictional and temporal intelligence · NXS-EOPDesigned programme process, not a record of operation. No cycle has run and every programme is at service level R0. A gate is a programme decision, never a public-authority approval, certification or deployment authorisation. The pages cited are design doctrine.

05Build environment

Working with the tools.

Analysis runs in Foundry for authorised projects. Public pages show released views only, each with its time and space reference and its rights.

06Sources

Where this page's references lead.

The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.

07Pages

Pages in Data and technical methods.

08Questions

Questions and answers.

Can I use the data?
Each released view states its licence and terms. Data that is not released is not available through these pages.
ReportsContribute

Contribute evidence from this page.

Reports is the Consortium's quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRICybersecurity and Digital ResilienceStrategic SystemsScenario and Stress-Test
Cybersecurity and Digital Resilience

Bring a method, a dataset or a question.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.