Earthquake scenarios for exercises
Scenario earthquakes on known faults are used to estimate shaking and damage patterns that exercises then respond to.
GCRI · Disaster Resilience and Recovery
Earth and geophysical science supplies the evidence for disasters from earthquakes, landslides, volcanoes and tsunamis. In this field it informs scenarios for exercises, land-use decisions in recovery and the siting of shelters and critical facilities.
Geoscience studies the composition, structure and dynamics of the solid Earth, including earthquakes, volcanoes, landslides and subsurface resources. It informs where and how often geological hazards occur and how they cascade into infrastructure and supply disruption. In disaster and crisis and climate and hazards, geoscience sets ground-shaking and ground-failure inputs for building codes, siting and catastrophe models. It identifies where single geological events can disrupt multiple networks at once. The canonical description is on the STEM Commons.
Scenario earthquakes on known faults are used to estimate shaking and damage patterns that exercises then respond to.
Post-event landslide inventories and susceptibility maps inform where reconstruction should avoid unstable slopes or stabilise them first.
Candidate shelter and critical facility sites are screened for liquefaction, landslide and tsunami hazard before they are designated.
Population density, flood water, active fires and true-colour imagery over the Philippines, from NASA GIBS. Each layer carries its own date.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 4
Hazards now, for this page
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
Hazards now, framed on the Philippines.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date. They are indicators, not assessments of any place.
Layers and dates
Datasets and records used by earth and geophysical science on this platform, with the role each plays and the label its values carry. Sources are listed in the source register.
| Data | Role | Label |
|---|---|---|
| Earthquake catalogues and ShakeMaps | Scenario inputs | OBSERVED |
| Landslide inventories | Susceptibility | OBSERVED |
| Geological survey maps | Site conditions | Published statistics |
| Tsunami inundation models | Coastal hazard | MODELLED |
The screen a team would use to follow this method: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.
Hazard models are tested against historical and paleoseismic catalogues and observed ground motions. Deformation estimates are cross-checked between independent geodetic techniques.
| Check | How it is done |
|---|---|
| Scenario plausibility | Scenario events are reviewed by geological services |
| Inventory completeness | Landslide inventories state their mapping method and coverage |
| Site verification | Screening results are checked with site investigation where decisions depend on them |
Catalogues are short relative to recurrence intervals of large events. Fault interactions and triggering are difficult to predict deterministically.
Two stocks, pressure and adaptive capacity, joined by a reinforcing growth loop, a delayed balancing response and damage when pressure outruns capacity; past the threshold the system can tip. Teaching model with stated illustrative values, not a prediction. The map on this page shows The Philippines; the model itself is not tied to a place.
Controls
Readouts
| Year | Pressure | Capacity | Perceived |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 20.0 |
| 4 | 23.3 | 44.9 | 21.2 |
| 8 | 27.2 | 42.2 | 24.0 |
| 12 | 31.7 | 42.3 | 27.7 |
| 16 | 36.8 | 45.5 | 32.2 |
| 20 | 42.3 | 51.5 | 37.2 |
| 24 | 47.9 | 60.3 | 42.6 |
| 28 | 53.2 | 71.3 | 48.0 |
| 32 | 57.8 | 84.3 | 53.1 |
| 36 | 66.4 | 98.4 | 58.4 |
| 40 | 82.7 | 115.9 | 69.7 |
| 44 | 97.8 | 139.7 | 83.8 |
| 48 | 109.1 | 169.4 | 97.3 |
No observed data enters this model: it runs on the teaching values set by the controls, to be replaced with a programme's own evidence.
Across the six pillars, led by Nexus Consortium
Assembled from the Nexus Standards area profile Compound and cascading hazard standards: the hazards it names, the systems and sectors that carry the loss, the controls that dampen it and the data that observe it. Choose the components, pick an initiating hazard and step through the cascade. The Map view places the run on an example geography with open data. Every coupling weight is a stated assumption you can change. A teaching model, not a forecast, an assessment or a certification. To model a place of your own choosing, open the full System Builder.
Hazards
Systems and couplings
Controls
NS-0 Constitution and principlesNS-3 Risk record UNIs (grammar, legacy crosswalk, allocation authority)NS-9 Contextual UNIs (deployments, instances, programme instances)NS-11 Verification and monitoring (evidence, attestations, zero-trust conformance observation)NRS-H61 Hazard family: Cascading failure (NHS-1 sys.cascade)NRS-H62 Hazard family: Compound and multi-hazard events (NHS-1 sys.compound)NRS-H60 Hazard family: Supply-chain and flow disruption (NHS-1 sys.supply-chain)NRS-H94 Hazard family: Systemic cyber events (NHS-1 cyber.systemic-cyber)NRS-H107 Hazard family: Digital infrastructure concentration and monoculture (NHS-1 tech.digital-concentration)NRS-H7 Hazard family: Large-scale circulation anomalies (NHS-1 atmo.climate-mode)Observation
Example geography
Climate and Hazards stewards earth and geophysical science for the Consortium and reviews how it is applied across platforms.
The model, its assumptions, its data and its uncertainty, in the form a scientist or engineer would check. Structures follow published methods. The values drawn are illustrative, not findings.
How far the outlook for geoscience for disaster resilience could spread, shown as ranges rather than a single line.
Reports is the Consortium's quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
Never send personal data, sensitive infrastructure detail or anything you have no right to share. A contribution is reviewed before use; sending it confers no authorship or editorial rights, and sponsorship never buys a finding.
Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.
Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.
This site uses only strictly necessary cookies to work and to remember your privacy choices. Nothing loads from other companies, and we never sell or share your personal information.
This site uses only strictly necessary cookies to work and to remember your privacy choices. Nothing loads from other companies, and we never sell or share your personal information. We run no advertising. You can review your choices at any time through Privacy choices at the foot of every page.