Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

Methodology

How the edition was made: methods, the model card, the evidence cut and its age, the acceptance record and the glossary.

13 min read0 figures13 tables12 notesNR-STRATEGIC-INSURANCE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. ·Executive summary
  3. 1Protection gaps are shared risk
  4. 2Key findings
  5. 3Systems and sectors at baseline
  6. 4Risks and capability
  7. 5Large insured loss that meets soft pricing and thin backstops
  8. 6Readings from the other desks
  9. 7The 2027 agenda
  10. 8Systems in depth
  11. AMethodology
    1. A.1 Methods
    2. A.2 Model card, Insurance and Protection Gap Model v0
    3. A.3 The baseline evidence cut
    4. A.4 Evidence age and coverage
    5. A.5 Evidence cards, two anchor sources
    6. A.6 Publication acceptance record
    7. A.7 Status words
    8. A.8 How the edition is made, released and corrected
    9. A.9 Glossary and abbreviations
    10. A.10 Technical annex
  12. BData appendix
  13. CReferences and record
  14. ·Complete edition, for print

A.1Methods

The global baseline uses published values and four simple derivations. Each is shown in full so that any reader can reproduce it.

Table A.1Methods
No.DerivationCalculationResult
(1)Spread of 2025 insured loss estimates129 minus 10722 USD billion
(2)Spread of 2025 economic loss estimates296 minus 22076 USD billion
(3)FAIR Plan exposure per policy, September 2026773 billion ÷ 698,307≈ USD 1.1 million
(4)Insured share of Asia-Pacific losses, 20259 ÷ 73≈ 12%
(5)Swiss Re implied uninsured share, 2025100 minus 49≈ 51%
Table A.2Coupling strength scale (matrix and model card)
StrengthDefinition
STRONGa disruption in the source system has historically changed the target system’s service or output within one season, in more than one region
MODERATEan effect is documented but buffered or slower
WEAKan effect is plausible but not documented at global scale
Table A.3Status grammar
LabelRule
Reportedvalue as issued by its source, with year
Inferredreasoned from cited evidence; never a measurement
EstimatedNexus analytical value with stated method
Scenarioconditional on stated assumptions
Expert inputstructured editorial judgement awaiting evidence

A.2Model card, Insurance and Protection Gap Model v0

Model ID
MDL-SR06-INSURANCE · v0.1
Purpose
represent insurance and risk financing as a linked system and the mechanisms by which loss moves between households, insurers, reinsurers and governments
Family
graph-based system of systems
Inputs
the cited sources of this edition; no proprietary data
Method
expert-specified coupling strengths (STRONG · MODERATE · WEAK) from assessments and analogue events
Validation
none yet, first validation against federation evidence in 2027
Uncertainty
qualitative; strengths are hypotheses, not measurements
Domain of validity
global scale; not for asset-, site- or country-level use
Reproducibility
strength table and sources published in this edition
20couplings

typed in v0

1strong

documented within one season

4moderate

documented, buffered

15weak

plausible, undocumented

A.3The baseline evidence cut

Every Nexus edition is published from a frozen evidence cut. The global baseline cut is documentary: it pins the exact edition of every source cited. Federation cuts begin with the first national Foundry cuts in 2027.

Cut ID
DC-STRATEGIC-INSURANCE-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Type
baseline documentary cut
Resolution policy
pinned · as of 30 September 2026
Sources pinned
48 cited sources, each at the edition and access date in the references
Model runs
none at baseline, analytical values are stated with their method
Digest
computed at freeze and recorded in the publication record
Supersedes
nothing, first cut of the series
Superseded by
the 2027 insurance and protection gaps annual cut

Lineage

  1. 01

    source edition

  2. 02

    pinned citation

  3. 03

    finding

  4. 04

    page

  5. 05

    publication record

Table A.4From the baseline cut to the federation cut
ElementBaseline 20262027 global annual
Sourcescited global publications, pinned by editionnational, regional and sector cuts through one graph
Analysisstated methods and editorial estimatestyped analysis specifications
ModelsInsurance and Protection Gap Model v0 specificationmodel runs with receipts
Findingstwelve baseline findingsfindings re-bound to federation evidence
Reviewfive passes scheduledfive passes on the exact digest

A.4Evidence age and coverage

A 2026 global edition rests on evidence observed in many different years. This page shows each time base, so that no single year label hides older evidence.

Table A.5Evidence age and coverage
IndicatorObservedReleasedCadenceNext release
Global insured loss estimates2025Jan to Mar 2026annualnext annual reports in early 2027
Protection gap, all perils2023Jul 2024annualno later edition found
US homeowners availability2018 to 2022Jan 2025one-offNAIC data call under way
California FAIR PlanSep 2026Sep 2026quarterlynext quarter
Florida CitizensNov 2025Nov 2025weeklycurrent count not retrieved
US flood programmeNov 2026Sep 2026per extension11 December 2026
European protection gap data1980 to 2024Dec 2025annualnext update
Parametric payoutsto Apr 2025Apr 2025per eventpost-close, context only: 83 payouts and about USD 500 million to October 202617
Reinsurance pricingJan 2026Jan 2026annualJanuary 2027 renewals
Cyber premiums20252026annualnext survey
Table A.6Coverage by system at baseline
SystemCoverageThinnest dimension
Natural catastrophe loss totalsGOODone-method global series
Protection gapPARTIALgap for 2025 on one method
Residual marketsPARTIALschemes outside the US
Public backstopsPARTIALscheme coverage by country
AvailabilityTHINdata outside the US
CyberTHINinsured share of loss
Health and mortality gapsTHINvalues after 2023
AffordabilityTHINhousehold cost of cover
Table A.7Designed empty states: what is not bound, what would fill it and why
FieldSource that would fill itBlocker
Global insured and economic loss for 2025 on one stated methodSwiss Re Institute, Munich Re, Aon, Gallagher Re annual reportsfour estimates differ in scope; the Swiss Re and Munich Re reports were read through trade coverage and not in full
Global protection gap for 2025 on one methodSwiss Re resilience index or a successorno 2024 or 2025 edition of the index found; 2023 is the latest bound value
Health, mortality and crop protection gapsSwiss Re resilience index5component values were not retrieved from a primary page
Household affordability of cover by countrynational statistics offices, supervisors and insurersno comparable series found
Withdrawal of cover and nonrenewal outside the United Statesnational supervisorsnot retrieved; no comparable series found
US nonrenewal and premium data after 2022NAIC homeowners data call23the data call is in design; no published series found
Current Florida Citizens policy countFlorida Citizens weekly figures9the Citizens page was not found; the latest bound count is from late November 2025
Cyber insured share of lossMunich Re survey and national incident data19the page gives premiums and forecasts, not an insured share
UNDRR GAR 2025 figures on disaster loss and insuranceUNDRR GAR 202526not opened; no figure from it is used
EU protection gap values from the EIOPA dashboardEIOPA dashboard13the dashboard page gives scope but no value; the dashboard itself was not read
Capital and solvency position of residual markets after a large lossscheme annual reportsnot retrieved
Capability rungs beyond loss responseinsurers, supervisors, ministriesnot reviewed

A.5Evidence cards, two anchor sources

Issued by a reinsurance broker. Annual with half-year updates. Role: binds FIN-001 and FIN-002. Coverage: global. The figures were read in trade coverage of the report; the report itself was not opened.

EVD-SR06-001

Gallagher Re Natural Catastrophe and Climate Report4

Issued by a national agency. One-off. Role: binds FIN-006. Coverage: US ZIP Codes, 2018 to 2022. The release page was read; the report itself was not opened.

EVD-SR06-002

US Treasury Federal Insurance Office homeowners report12

Table A.8Quality dimensions at baseline
DimensionEVD-SR06-001EVD-SR06-002
Completenessbroker sample and model estimates330 insurers; ZIP Code aggregates
Timelinessabout 1 to 3 months after year endabout 3 years after the last data year
Revisionlater reports restate prior yearsnone found
Method transparencyscope stated in the report; not read in fullmethod stated in the release
External validationcompared here against three other publishersindustry groups dispute the reading

Evidence cards to follow in 2027

  • Gallagher Re4 and Aon3: report text on scope and method
  • Swiss Re1 and Munich Re2: full reports
  • FIO12: full report and data tables
  • EIOPA13: dashboard values for the protection gap

A.6Publication acceptance record

Editorial self-check at evidence close. Every applicable item carries a disposition; the remaining items are review, approval and deposit.

Table A.9Publication acceptance record
GroupAreaItemsPassN/APending
D1Identity and scope8800
D2Source and data12912
D3Analysis and models12381
D4Findings and claims9801
D5Figures, tables, maps10622
D6Editorial and citations10802
D7Review and approval130013
D8Artefact and design12705
D9Registry and release9009

Publication gate

Conditions met
14 of 23 at evidence close
Blocking problems
none recorded
Open conditions
reviews, approval of the exact digest, deposit, registry pointer

Not applicable at baseline

Model runs
first runs in Q1 2027
Maps
plates in Q2 2027
Waivers
none

A.7Status words

Table A.10The status every value carries
StatusWhat it means
ObservedMeasured directly and published by the source.
ReportedPublished statistics of an official or institutional source.
DeclaredStated by the body concerned; not independently measured.
EstimatedA Nexus estimate from cited evidence, with its method in Annex A.
ModelledProduced by a stated model from cited inputs.
InferredReasoned from cited evidence; not measured.
ForecastA projection by the cited source.
SimulatedA simulation result under stated assumptions.
ScenarioA conditional statement under stated assumptions; never a prediction.
Expert inputExpert judgement, recorded with its basis.
CandidateProposed for a later edition; not yet evidence.
Evidence-quality levels (EQL 1 to 5) grade the source behind a value; they are not a score of the subject.

A.8How the edition is made, released and corrected

Every edition is built from a sealed evidence cut, reviewed under three keys, signed and deposited before any site shows it as published; corrections go to Nexus Standards as change proposals and feed the next cut.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Evidence arrives from the pillarsFoundry seals observations and indicator series, Universe hands over after-action and scenario findings, and contributions are screened at every gateway, including this site’s.
02 The cut is sealedOn the cut date the evidence is pinned under one identifier, so anyone can rebuild the edition from exactly what it was built on.
03 The edition is assembledThe edition is drafted from its template and content pack. Agents may draft; they never publish and never decide.
04 The keys turnAt the publisher of record the truth key comes first: every value is checked against its source or stated method before the meaning and capital keys turn. No edition moves on until every key has been turned by a named steward.
05 The gate opensA named approver releases one exact digest of the edition; any change after this point is a new version, never a silent edit.
06 Signed and depositedThe PDF, the web edition and the data bundle are signed together with a manifest and an RO-Crate description, and deposited on Zenodo with a concept and a version DOI.
07 Published on its desk’s siteOnly then does the edition show as published on its desk’s Reports site, and the Collection lists it as a part.
08 Corrections go to StandardsMethod and correction findings go to Nexus Standards as change proposals; citations, corrections and new contributions feed the next evidence cut.

A teaching model of the process, not a forecast and not a record of any run; dates and counts on this page come from the programme record. Sources: Reports governance at GCRI Canada (2026); Zenodo, repository of record for Reports deposits (2026).

Lifecycle, one state at a time: Draft, Computed, Evidence bound, Reviewed, Approved for release, Published, Corrected, Superseded. This edition is a draft.

A.9Glossary and abbreviations

Table A.11Series terms
TermMeaning
Baseline Editionthe inaugural annual edition that fixes the reference state for the series
WEFH+Bwater, energy, food, health and biodiversity, the national nexus core
Couplinga typed dependency through which one system transmits to another
Protection gapthe share of losses not covered by insurance
Capability ladderLISTED → EXISTS → ADEQUATE → TESTED → DEMONSTRATED
EQLevidence-quality level, 1–5
Evidence cuta frozen resolution of exact sources and versions
NNC · NLC · NWGNational Nexus Consortium · National Leadership Council · National Working Groups
Table A.12Abbreviations used in this edition
AbbreviationExpansion
ARPCAustralian Reinsurance Pool Corporation
CCRIFCaribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility
CRSCongressional Research Service
EIOPAEuropean Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority
FIOFederal Insurance Office
IAISInternational Association of Insurance Supervisors
ISSBInternational Sustainability Standards Board
NAICNational Association of Insurance Commissioners
NFIPNational Flood Insurance Program
RMARisk Management Agency
SCSsevere convective storm
UNDRRUnited Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction

A.10Technical annex

Table A.13Technical annex
ItemAnnexContentsStatus
A.1Indicator definitionsthe global indicator set, with units and sourcesIN THIS EDITION
A.2Coupling strengthsthe twenty-cell matrix and its rationaleIN THIS EDITION
A.3Scenario specificationSCN-SR06-LOSS-01 assumptions and signpostsIN THIS EDITION
A.4Capability placementsrung evidence for fifteen functionsIN THIS EDITION
A.5Model diagnosticsfirst runs and validation2027
A.6Sensitivity analysesinfluence of coupling strengths2027
A.7Regional notesregional protection gap cardsWITH REGIONAL EDITIONS
A.8Review statementspass-by-pass review recordAT RELEASE

A.1 · indicator definition: protection gap

Construct
the part of economic loss or need that is not covered by insurance or other pre-arranged finance
Unit
share of economic loss, or premium equivalent in USD
Method
economic loss less insured loss, as stated by each publisher
Source
Aon3; Gallagher Re4; Swiss Re5
Uncertainty
economic loss is modelled; scope and perils differ between publishers
Known limits
does not record affordability, take-up by income or the cost of public relief

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 17POST-CLOSE, context only: CCRIF SPC (ed.), About us (40 members; 83 payouts and about USD 500 million paid from June 2007 to October 2026; eight parametric products). CCRIF SPC, Grand Cayman. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 5Artemis (ed.), report of the Swiss Re Institute sigma resilience index published in July 2024 (global protection gap USD 1.83 trillion in 2023; natural catastrophe gap USD 385 billion premium equivalent; natural catastrophe resilience 25.7%; United States 39%; national values from about 5% to above 80%). The sigma report was not opened. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 23POST-CLOSE, context only: National Association of Insurance Commissioners (ed.), Homeowners Insurance (most mortgage lenders require homeowners coverage; Homeowners Market Data Call meetings of 14 and 16 October 2026 and a joint meeting set for 16 November 2026). NAIC, Kansas City. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 9News Service of Florida (ed.), report on Florida Citizens Property Insurance Corporation policy counts, 25 November 2025 (439,079 policies; peak of about 1.4 million in September 2023). Read through a television station republication. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 19Munich Re (ed.), Global Cyber Risk and Insurance Survey 2026 (premium volume nearly USD 15 billion in 2025; about USD 28 billion forecast for 2030; over 9,500 respondents in 20 countries). Munich Re, Munich. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: UNDRR (ed.), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025: Resilience Pays, cited from memory; no figure used. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 13EIOPA (ed.), Dashboard on insurance protection gap for natural catastrophes (30 European countries; insurance coverage and economic loss data from 1980 to 2024; page updated December 2025). European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 4Reinsurance News (ed.), report of Gallagher Re, Natural Catastrophe and Climate Report, full year 2025 (insured losses USD 129 billion; economic losses USD 296 billion; protection gap 56% or USD 167 billion; United States USD 100 billion or 78%). The Gallagher Re report was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 12US Department of the Treasury, Federal Insurance Office (ed.), Homeowners insurance report, press release of 16 January 2025 (more than 330 insurers; 246 million policies; 2018 to 2022; ZIP Code level; nonrenewal rates about 80% higher in the highest-risk ZIP Codes). The report itself was not opened. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 3Aon (ed.), 2026 Climate and Catastrophe Insight (page read to character 100,000 of 220,843: economic losses USD 260 billion; insured losses USD 127 billion; protection gap 51%, a record low). Aon, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 1Insurance Journal and Reinsurance News (eds.), reports of Swiss Re Institute, sigma 1/2026, Natural catastrophes in 2025: the persistent rise of wildfire and storm risk (insured losses USD 107 billion; economic losses USD 220 billion; 92% from secondary perils; Los Angeles wildfires USD 40 billion; trend 5% to 7% a year; 2026 normal level USD 148 billion and peak scenario about USD 320 billion), articles of March 2026. The sigma report itself was not opened; the Swiss Re page returned an access error. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 2Insurance Journal, Insurance Business and Reinsurance News (eds.), reports of Munich Re, natural disaster losses in 2025, 13 January 2026 (overall losses about USD 224 billion; insured about USD 108 billion; Asia-Pacific about USD 73 billion overall and USD 9 billion insured; Africa about USD 3 billion; January 2026 reinsurance rates down 14.7%). One article printed USD 244 billion for overall losses, a typographical conflict with USD 224 billion elsewhere. The Munich Re release was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Cite this annex

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Annex A: Methodology. In Strategic Systems Report 2026: Insurance, Protection Gaps and Insurability (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-STRATEGIC-INSURANCE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Insurance, Protection Gaps and Insurability.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskStrategic Systems

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.