Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

Readings from the other desks

The global baseline is read through each steward’s lens, then once as a whole. Each lens is a projection of reviewed findings, not a separate argument. The other desks’ own editions of this subject are listed first, as cross-references, not copies.

17 min read0 figures8 tables41 notesNR-STRATEGIC-INSURANCE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. ·Executive summary
  3. 1Protection gaps are shared risk
  4. 2Key findings
  5. 3Systems and sectors at baseline
  6. 4Risks and capability
  7. 5Large insured loss that meets soft pricing and thin backstops
  8. 6Readings from the other desks
    1. 6.1 The other desks’ editions of this subject
    2. 6.2 Three lenses
    3. 6.3 Standards, Academy and steward contributions
    4. 6.4 GCRI reading: the model card
    5. 6.5 Global Risks Forum reading: editorial essays
    6. 6.6 Global Risks Alliance reading: 2027 insurance and protection gaps readiness pack
    7. 6.7 Nexus Standards reading: standards and regulatory watch
    8. 6.8 Risk Academy reading: literature and evidence review, science and assessments
  9. 7The 2027 agenda
  10. 8Systems in depth
  11. AMethodology
  12. BData appendix
  13. CReferences and record
  14. ·Complete edition, for print

6.1The other desks’ editions of this subject

Federation: each desk writes its own edition for the subjects in its remit. Until a desk releases, its edition shows its frame and the reading this edition printed for it.

DeskEditionStateIdentifier
GCRI Systems EvidenceNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
GRF Public DeliberationOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
GRA Capital ReadinessNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
Standards ProgressOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
Academy CapabilityOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
Index MeasurementOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit

6.2Three lenses

One edition, read by each steward. The lens of this site comes first.

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports reading protection gaps as shared risk. Common causes recur across markets, loss spreads through nonrenewal, residual markets and short-dated public schemes, and thresholds such as scheme deadlines and reinsurance pricing set how far it travels. Evidence is strongest for loss totals and weakest for household affordability.

FIN-001 · FIN-006 · INF-009 · SYS-012

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people a protection gap arrives as a refused renewal, a flood claim that is not covered or a repair bill with no payout. The baseline asks that public debate treat insurance as shared and keep take-up and affordability in view.

FIN-002 · FIN-006 · INF-009

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. Loss trends are rising, reinsurance prices fell at January 2026 renewals, and several public schemes run on short terms1210. These show where finance-readiness evidence will matter. Nothing here is advice, a rating or an approval.

FIN-010 · DEV-011

NEXUS

Synthesis

Protection gaps are well described as loss totals and thinly measured as a system. The 2027 programme should bind one-method gap data, test the large-loss pathway and map affordability before the next large event.

SYS-012 · P-01 · P-02

6.3Standards, Academy and steward contributions

How the Nexus Standards drafts, the Risk Academy and the three stewards feed each quarterly edition for insurance and protection gaps. The standards are a preparatory working draft (2026) and are cited as drafts, never as adopted standards.

Table 6.1The quarterly rhythm every edition follows
QuarterEditionQuestionBoundary
Q1State and AgendaWhat matters this year, and what is the starting position?observed baseline stays distinct from planned work
Q2Evidence and BuildWhat new evidence and capability exist?a configured capability is not a validated result
Q3Stress Test and ReadinessWhat do scenarios and tests show?simulated loss or performance is not observed impact
Q4Annual Synthesis and RenewalWhat changed in the year, and what renews?release follows review, not event publicity deadlines
Table 6.2Who contributes what each quarter
Steward or bodyRoleContribution route
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI Canada)Lead Institution and Consortium Secretariat; publisher of record; technical truth (key T)science and practice communities · GCRI gateway
The Global Risks Forum (GRF)leadership, dialogue and the Universe programme; public meaning (key M)policy, Universe and national adoption · GRF gateway
The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)finance, insurance and development readiness; capital meaning (key F)finance and insurance · GRA gateway
Nexus Standardspreparatory drafts on vocabulary, hazards, indicators and methodsStandards site · working groups HAZ, IND, MTH, FIN, AI
Risk Academylearning pathways tied to the agenda questionsAcademy gateway · learning by review
Reports strategic desksinsurance chapter inputs: GCRI evidence and GRA readinessstrategic editorial board

Standards drafts used in this edition

  • Risk vocabulary NRS-C1 (424 terms) for terms in the glossary
  • Hazard atlas NHS-1 1.1.0 (905 hazards in 120 families) for risk objects
  • Seven risk classes: global, catastrophic, existential, emerging, planetary, exponential, frontier-tech

Standards calendar to watch

  • Founding calls from 20 October 2026; working groups meet from 5 November 2026
  • Inaugural Global Standards Council session, 12 January 2027
  • Quarterly reviews in March, June, September and December, aligned with each edition

6.4GCRI reading: the model card

GCRI’s reading of this edition is its model card: what the national model is, what it computes and where it stops. It is printed in full in Annex A, with the methods it belongs to. Annex A, methodology

6.5Global Risks Forum reading: editorial essays

Four signed essays by the Reports editorial team set out the positions this edition takes. They are interpretation, labelled as such; the evidence they draw on is in the findings register.

Households, insurers, reinsurers and governments pass loss to one another. When cover thins at one point, the loss lands on the next. This edition reads the chain, not one line of business.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 01

Insurance is a system

A market can be well priced and still leave most loss uninsured. The gap is the uncovered share, and it differs by country from about 5% to above 80% of losses covered.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 02

Take-up is as important as price

Flood, cyclone and parametric schemes move loss to the public balance sheet. Their terms differ: some run to a set date, some on short authorisations, some on a government guarantee.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 03

Public schemes trade time for cover

Price signals can reward mitigation, and mitigation lowers insured loss. Evidence for this at market scale is thin and sits with sector editions.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 04

Pricing and prevention work together

6.6Global Risks Alliance reading: 2027 insurance and protection gaps readiness pack

The registers that open the 2027 global cycle. At baseline each is initialised from this edition.

Table 6.32027 insurance and protection gaps readiness pack
ItemRegisterState at baselineFirst 2027 entry
E1Global risk state deltabaseline set by this editionchanges against the baseline
E2WEFH+B state deltafive global system readings setindicator updates and freshness
E3Agenda and Portfolio movementeight agenda items · 6 proposed objectsadmission decisions
E4Federation delivery registernational chapters in preparationnational chapters
E5Consortium capability registernational consortia formingfirst contributions
E6Leadership questions and challengesnone yetfirst challenge log
E7Foundry technical statenational environments preparedfirst federation cut
E8Publication candidatestwelve findings carried forwardPUBLISH · HOLD dispositions
E9Universe readinessone candidate missionadmission and role spine
E10Correction registernonefirst federation-wide cycle

Publication dispositions

  • Publish
  • Hold
  • Needs evidence
  • Restricted
  • Superseded

6.7Nexus Standards reading: standards and regulatory watch

Instruments and published guidance that shape the systems in this edition, by status on the retrieval date. The edition assesses no one’s compliance.

  • IN FORCE
  • ADOPTED
  • PUBLISHED · GUIDANCE
  • PUBLISHED · VOLUNTARY
Table 6.4Standards and regulatory watch
InstrumentBodyScopeStatusRelevance
Solvency II Directive, amended by Directive (EU) 2025/222European UnionEUIN FORCEprudential rules
IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures21ISSBglobal useISSUED 2023climate disclosure
Insurance Core Principles29IAISglobalADOPTED 2019supervision
Application Paper on climate-related risks30IAISglobalPUBLISHED · GUIDANCEclimate supervision
Principles for Sustainable Insurance20UNEP FIglobalPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYinsurer practice
ISO 31000 risk management31ISOglobalPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYrisk process
Sendai Framework 2015 to 203028UNDRRglobalADOPTED 2015disaster risk reduction
National Flood Insurance Act of 196834United StatesUSIN FORCEflood programme
Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 200233United StatesUSIN FORCEterrorism backstop
Federal crop insurance programme24USDA RMAUSIN FORCEcrop cover
Cyclone Reinsurance Pool18AustraliaAUIN FORCEcyclone and related flood

Changed since 2024

  • The amended Solvency II rules apply from 30 January 202722
  • The ISSB issued amendments to greenhouse gas emissions disclosures in December 202521
  • The US flood programme was extended to 11 December 2026 after lapses in 2025 and 202610

To watch in 2027

  • Reauthorisation of the US flood programme10
  • Application of the amended Solvency II rules22
  • EU decisions on a reinsurance scheme and a public disaster fund1415

6.8Risk Academy reading: literature and evidence review, science and assessments

The review behind this edition covers insurance and protection gaps assessments, peer-reviewed science and the institutional reports that bind its findings. Systematic reviews for each agenda item begin in 2027.

Review protocol

Question
What does the published evidence establish about the world’s insurance markets, protection gaps and insurability limits and its couplings?
Sources searched
insurer and broker loss reports; supervisory papers; scheme statistics; peer-reviewed insurance economics
Window
releases available at evidence close, 30 September 2026
Selection
sources that bind or contextualise a finding in this edition
Next step
systematic reviews for agenda items 01 to 05 in 2027
Table 6.5Peer-reviewed science and economics
ReferenceTypeYearRoleUsed for
Arrow38journal article1963frameworkuncertainty and insurance
Akerlof39journal article1970frameworkadverse selection
Rothschild and Stiglitz40journal article1976frameworkcompetitive insurance markets
Kunreuther and Pauly41journal article2004supportslow take-up of cover
Kousky and Cooke42journal article2012supportsfailure to insure catastrophic risk
Froot43journal article2001supportscatastrophe risk markets
Michel-Kerjan44journal article2010contextflood programme economics
Cummins and Trainar45journal article2009frameworkreinsurance and securitisation
Ben-Shahar and Logue46journal article2012frameworkinsurance and moral hazard
Zscheischler et al.47journal article2018frameworkcompound events
Table 6.6Institutional flagships
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Natural catastrophes in 2025, as reported1Swiss Re Institute2026supportslosses and trends
World insurance in 2026, as reported6Swiss Re Institute2026contextpremium growth
Resilience index, as reported5Swiss Re Institute2024supportsprotection gap
Outlook, as reported7Swiss Re Institute2025contextexposure and premiums
Towards a European system1415EIOPA and ECB2024supportsEU proposals
Dashboard on the protection gap13EIOPA2025contextEuropean data
GAR 202526UNDRR2025contextdisaster risk
AR6 Working Group II27IPCC2022contextimpacts and adaptation
Table 6.7Loss statistics and market reports
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Natural disaster losses 20252Munich Re2026supportslosses and renewals
Climate and Catastrophe Insight 20263Aon2026supportslosses and gap
Natural Catastrophe and Climate Report4Gallagher Re2026supportslosses and gap
Global Cyber Risk and Insurance Survey19Munich Re2026supportscyber premiums
Homeowners insurance report12US Treasury FIO2025supportsavailability and price
NFIP Insight10Congressional Research Service2026supportsflood programme
FAIR Plan statistics8California FAIR Plan2026supportsresidual market
Citizens policy counts9News Service of Florida2025contextresidual market
Table 6.8Standards, directives and schemes
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Solvency II amendments22EIOPA2026contextprudential rules
IFRS S221ISSB2023contextclimate disclosure
Principles for Sustainable Insurance20UNEP FI2012contextinsurer principles
Insurance Core Principles29IAIS2019contextsupervision
Climate application paper30IAIS2021contextclimate supervision
Cyclone pool18ARPC2022supportspublic backstop
CCRIF snapshot48CCRIF2025supportsparametric cover
CCRIF About us17CCRIF2026post-close, context onlylater payout totals
Flood Re16Flood Re2026contextaffordable flood cover

Where the evidence agrees

  • Insured losses are rising in real terms and secondary perils dominate12
  • Take-up of cover is low in many markets25
  • Public schemes carry part of the loss in several countries10164818

Where it is unsettled

  • What the global protection gap was in 2025 on one method34
  • How far withdrawal of cover will spread beyond high-risk US areas12
  • How much of cyber loss is insured19

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1Insurance Journal and Reinsurance News (eds.), reports of Swiss Re Institute, sigma 1/2026, Natural catastrophes in 2025: the persistent rise of wildfire and storm risk (insured losses USD 107 billion; economic losses USD 220 billion; 92% from secondary perils; Los Angeles wildfires USD 40 billion; trend 5% to 7% a year; 2026 normal level USD 148 billion and peak scenario about USD 320 billion), articles of March 2026. The sigma report itself was not opened; the Swiss Re page returned an access error. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 2Insurance Journal, Insurance Business and Reinsurance News (eds.), reports of Munich Re, natural disaster losses in 2025, 13 January 2026 (overall losses about USD 224 billion; insured about USD 108 billion; Asia-Pacific about USD 73 billion overall and USD 9 billion insured; Africa about USD 3 billion; January 2026 reinsurance rates down 14.7%). One article printed USD 244 billion for overall losses, a typographical conflict with USD 224 billion elsewhere. The Munich Re release was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 10Congressional Research Service (ed.), What Happens If the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Lapses?, Insight IN10835, version of 11 September 2026 (authorised to 11 December 2026; 36 short-term reauthorisations since FY2017; lapses 1 October to 12 November 2025 and 1 to 3 February 2026; borrowing limit USD 30.425 billion; nearly 4.5 million policies; almost USD 1.3 trillion coverage). Library of Congress, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 22EIOPA (ed.), Solvency II (Directive (EU) 2025/2 amends the framework; new rules apply from 30 January 2027). European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, Frankfurt. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 21IFRS Foundation (ed.), IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures (issued June 2023; effective for periods from 1 January 2024; amendments to greenhouse gas emissions disclosures issued December 2025). ISSB, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 29UNVERIFIED, not opened: IAIS (ed.), Insurance Core Principles, Standards, Guidance and Assessment Methodology, adopted November 2019, cited from memory. International Association of Insurance Supervisors, Basel. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: IAIS (ed.), Application Paper on the Supervision of Climate-related Risks in the Insurance Sector, May 2021, cited from memory. International Association of Insurance Supervisors, Basel. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 20UNEP Finance Initiative (ed.), Principles for Sustainable Insurance (launched 2012; close to 300 members). United Nations Environment Programme, Geneva. Observation year 2012. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO 31000:2018, Risk management: guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: UNDRR (ed.), Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015 to 2030, cited from memory; the monitoring host was not reachable. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva. Observation year 2015. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 34UNVERIFIED, not opened: National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, Title XIII of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, cited from memory; no figure used. United States Congress, Washington. Observation year 1968. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, Public Law 107-297, cited from memory; no figure used. United States Congress, Washington. Observation year 2002. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 24USDA Risk Management Agency (ed.), About RMA (created 1996; supports the private insurers that sell federal crop insurance). US Department of Agriculture, Washington. Observation year 1996. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 18Australian Reinsurance Pool Corporation (ed.), Cyclone Reinsurance Pool (commenced 1 July 2022; annually reinstated government guarantee of 10 billion, stated as dollars and read here as Australian dollars; mitigation discounts; cost-neutral to government over the longer term). ARPC, Canberra. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 14EIOPA and ECB (eds.), Towards a European system for natural catastrophe risk management (publication page; 18 December 2024; proposes an EU public-private reinsurance scheme and an EU fund for public disaster financing). EIOPA, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 15European Central Bank and Banque de France (eds.), press release on the ECB and EIOPA proposal for a European approach to natural catastrophes (18 December 2024; page updated 24 September 2026). Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: Arrow, K.J., Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care, American Economic Review 53(5), 941 to 973, 1963, cited from memory. Observation year 1963. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Akerlof, G.A., The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism, Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3), 488 to 500, 1970, cited from memory. Observation year 1970. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: Rothschild, M. and Stiglitz, J., Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: an essay on the economics of imperfect information, Quarterly Journal of Economics 90(4), 629 to 649, 1976, cited from memory. Observation year 1976. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: Kunreuther, H. and Pauly, M., Neglecting disaster: why don’t people insure against large losses?, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28(1), 5 to 21, 2004, cited from memory. Observation year 2004. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 42UNVERIFIED, not opened: Kousky, C. and Cooke, R., Explaining the failure to insure catastrophic risks, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 37, 206 to 227, 2012, cited from memory. Observation year 2012. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 43UNVERIFIED, not opened: Froot, K.A., The market for catastrophe risk: a clinical examination, Journal of Financial Economics 60, 529 to 571, 2001, cited from memory. Observation year 2001. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 44UNVERIFIED, not opened: Michel-Kerjan, E.O., Catastrophe economics: the National Flood Insurance Program, Journal of Economic Perspectives 24(4), 165 to 186, 2010, cited from memory. Observation year 2010. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  24. 45UNVERIFIED, not opened: Cummins, J.D. and Trainar, P., Securitization, insurance, and reinsurance, Journal of Risk and Insurance 76(3), 463 to 492, 2009, cited from memory. Observation year 2009. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  25. 46UNVERIFIED, not opened: Ben-Shahar, O. and Logue, K.D., Outsourcing regulation: how insurance reduces moral hazard, Michigan Law Review 111(2), 197 to 248, 2012, cited from memory. Observation year 2012. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  26. 47UNVERIFIED, not opened: Zscheischler, J. et al., Future climate risk from compound events, Nature Climate Change 8, 469 to 477, 2018, cited from memory. Springer Nature. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  27. 6Risk and Insurance (ed.), report of Swiss Re Institute, World insurance in 2026: shock absorbers in a fragmenting world, July 2026 (real premium growth 3.9% in 2025, 1.3% in 2026 and 1.6% in 2027). The sigma report was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  28. 5Artemis (ed.), report of the Swiss Re Institute sigma resilience index published in July 2024 (global protection gap USD 1.83 trillion in 2023; natural catastrophe gap USD 385 billion premium equivalent; natural catastrophe resilience 25.7%; United States 39%; national values from about 5% to above 80%). The sigma report was not opened. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  29. 7Artemis (ed.), report of Swiss Re Institute insurance market outlook, July 2025 (inflation-adjusted natural catastrophe exposure growth of 5% to 7% a year, faster than premiums). The outlook itself was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  30. 13EIOPA (ed.), Dashboard on insurance protection gap for natural catastrophes (30 European countries; insurance coverage and economic loss data from 1980 to 2024; page updated December 2025). European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  31. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: UNDRR (ed.), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025: Resilience Pays, cited from memory; no figure used. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  32. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: IPCC, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Working Group II contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report, cited from memory; no figure used; the IPCC page returned an access error. Cambridge University Press. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  33. 3Aon (ed.), 2026 Climate and Catastrophe Insight (page read to character 100,000 of 220,843: economic losses USD 260 billion; insured losses USD 127 billion; protection gap 51%, a record low). Aon, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  34. 4Reinsurance News (ed.), report of Gallagher Re, Natural Catastrophe and Climate Report, full year 2025 (insured losses USD 129 billion; economic losses USD 296 billion; protection gap 56% or USD 167 billion; United States USD 100 billion or 78%). The Gallagher Re report was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  35. 19Munich Re (ed.), Global Cyber Risk and Insurance Survey 2026 (premium volume nearly USD 15 billion in 2025; about USD 28 billion forecast for 2030; over 9,500 respondents in 20 countries). Munich Re, Munich. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  36. 12US Department of the Treasury, Federal Insurance Office (ed.), Homeowners insurance report, press release of 16 January 2025 (more than 330 insurers; 246 million policies; 2018 to 2022; ZIP Code level; nonrenewal rates about 80% higher in the highest-risk ZIP Codes). The report itself was not opened. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  37. 8California FAIR Plan Association (ed.), Key Statistics and Data (September 2026: 698,307 policies in force; exposure USD 773 billion; written premium USD 2.04 billion; policies up 157% and exposure up 252% since September 2022). California FAIR Plan Association, Los Angeles. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  38. 9News Service of Florida (ed.), report on Florida Citizens Property Insurance Corporation policy counts, 25 November 2025 (439,079 policies; peak of about 1.4 million in September 2023). Read through a television station republication. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  39. 48CCRIF SPC (ed.), CCRIF in a Snapshot, brief revised April 2025 (78 payouts totalling about USD 390 million between June 2007 and April 2025; 30 members as of June 2024). The PDF was opened and its text read. CCRIF SPC, Grand Cayman. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  40. 17POST-CLOSE, context only: CCRIF SPC (ed.), About us (40 members; 83 payouts and about USD 500 million paid from June 2007 to October 2026; eight parametric products). CCRIF SPC, Grand Cayman. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  41. 16Flood Re (ed.), About us (reinsurance scheme for affordable flood cover in home insurance; planned to run until 2039). Flood Re, London. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Cite this chapter

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Chapter 6: Readings from the other desks. In Strategic Systems Report 2026: Insurance, Protection Gaps and Insurability (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-STRATEGIC-INSURANCE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Insurance, Protection Gaps and Insurability.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the GCRI Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskStrategic Systems

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.