Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

  • Reports
  • Baseline Edition 2026
  • Complete edition

Exponential Technology Report 2026: Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology

Edition home

Choose A4 or Letter in the print dialog; running heads and page numbers are added in print. This is a review copy: the signed PDF with its DOI is issued at release.

ReportsXT-12

Exponential Technology

Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology 2026

Baseline Edition 2026NR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINEGCRI for the Nexus Consortium

Imprint

Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor, the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI)
Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) for the Nexus Consortium, Toronto
Report number
NR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE
Evidence close
30 September 2026, cut DC-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Status
Draft under stewardship review; not yet released
DOI and UNI
Issued at deposit
Licence
CC BY 4.0 for Nexus-authored text, tables and figures; third-party material keeps its own licence
Cite as
Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Exponential Technology Report 2026: Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI). https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/editions/xt-12/

Contents

  1. ·

    Executive summary

  2. 1

    Chapter 1. Materials are a discovery claim, a supply chain and a safety question

  3. 2

    Chapter 2. Key findings

  4. 3

    Chapter 3. Systems and sectors at baseline

  5. 4

    Chapter 4. Risks and capability

  6. 5

    Chapter 5. Reliance on claimed materials before independent synthesis

  7. 6

    Chapter 6. Readings from the other desks

  8. 7

    Chapter 7. The 2027 agenda

  9. 8

    Chapter 8. Systems in depth

  10. A

    Annex A. Methodology

  11. B

    Annex B. Data appendix

  12. C

    Annex C. References and record

Executive summary

The edition on a few pages: the abstract, the key messages, the headline finding and what each steward reads in it.

6 min read1 figure0 tables12 notesNR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

S.1Abstract

Advanced materials and nanotechnology matter to the Nexus programme in three ways. They are a discovery system, in which computation and robots now propose and make new compounds. They are a supply chain that rests on a few processing countries and on export controls. They are a safety question, because engineered nanomaterials reach use before hazard evidence is complete. The discovery evidence is large and contested. A 2023 study reports 2.2 million predicted structures below the known stability line, of which 736 were independently realised5. An autonomous laboratory reports 41 of 58 target compounds made in 17 days6. Two 2024 critiques find that these claims do not show new, credible and useful materials, and that about two thirds of the laboratory successes are likely known disordered phases89. A 2025 generative model reports structures more than twice as likely to be new and stable, with one synthesised example within 20% of its target7. The supply evidence is firmer. China produced an estimated 82% of natural graphite and 99% of primary low-purity gallium in 2025, and the United States relied on imports for all of both17. The European Union set 2030 benchmarks of 10%, 40% and 25% for extraction, processing and recycling18. Superconductivity claims have been retracted or refuted three times since 2022141516. This baseline sets out what the evidence supports and where it is thin. It forecasts no discovery and ranks no country, company or laboratory.

S.2Key messages

Six readings that frame the materials baseline, and the eight questions this edition answers, each with its status and source.

  1. Some are: 736 structures were independently realised, a small count against 2.2 million predicted.5

    Are predicted materials being made?Reported

  2. It reported 41 of 58 targets; critiques dispute how many are new.689

    Did a robot discover new materials?Reported

  3. One synthesised structure came within 20% of its target; one result is not a trend.7

    Does generative design work?Reported

  4. China produced most natural graphite and almost all primary gallium in 2025.17

    Who supplies the inputs?Reported

  5. Benchmarks for extraction, processing, recycling and diversification by 2030.18

    What does Europe require?Reported

  6. IARC assessed carbon nanotubes in 2017; coverage of other classes is not bound.20

    Are nanomaterials assessed for harm?Reported

  7. Not on a common basis in the sources read.19

    Is the footprint of production known?Expert input

  8. Reliance on claimed materials before independent synthesis. SCN-XT12-VER-01

    What will 2027 test first?Expert input

S.3Headline finding

ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-MIN-006

China accounted for 99% of world primary low-purity gallium production in 2025, and it imposed, widened and partly suspended export controls on gallium and rare earths between 2023 and 2025.

Figure S.1China share of world production, 2025
ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
Primary low-purity gallium (%)99
Natural graphite (%)82
Rare earth mine production, derived (%)69

Source: USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 202617. The rare earth value is derived as 270,000 ÷ 390,000 tonnes, method (3).

Supply of inputs for chips, optoelectronics, batteries and magnets depends on a few processing sites and on trade measures. The United States reported no domestic gallium production since 1987 and a net import reliance of 100%. China lifted its ban on gallium exports to the United States for one year in November 2025 and suspended its October 2025 rare earth controls for one year17.

S.4At a glance

2.2million

predicted structures5

736structures

independently realised5

41 of 58targets

autonomous laboratory6

82%

China share of natural graphite17

99%

China share of primary gallium17

40%

EU 2030 processing benchmark18

S.5What each steward reads in it

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports reading advanced materials as a discovery system with a verification gap, a supply chain with concentrated processing, and a safety question with thin coverage.

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people the materials story arrives as a headline about a breakthrough, a shortage or a hazard.

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. Private investment was not retrieved, supply depends on a few processing sites, and verification has costs that fall on research users.

NEXUS

Synthesis

Materials are well described by single results and thinly measured as a system.

S.6What this edition is, and is not

What this edition is

A baseline: the 2026 state of advanced materials and nanotechnology as infrastructure and the couplings through which it carries risk into other systems. It synthesises published evidence and ranks no country, company or asset.

What it is not

Not a forecast of any discovery, a technology ranking, an endorsement of any vendor, product or laboratory, or an assessment of any programme. Hazard classification, trade measures and standards are decisions of competent authorities.

What comes next

National, regional and sector evidence feeds the 2027 materials edition through the federation. Each edition reports what changed against this baseline: observations, source revisions, method changes, scenario updates and corrections.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 5Merchant, A., Batzner, S., Schoenholz, S.S., Aykol, M., Cheon, G. and Cubuk, E.D., Scaling deep learning for materials discovery, Nature 624, 80 to 85, 2023 (abstract record read: 48,000 known stable crystals; 2.2 million structures below the convex hull; 736 independently realised; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 6Szymanski, N.J. et al., An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials, Nature 624, 86 to 91, 2023 (abstract record read: 41 compounds from 58 targets in 17 days; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 8Cheetham, A.K. and Seshadri, R., Artificial intelligence driving materials discovery? Perspective on the article Scaling Deep Learning for Materials Discovery, Chemistry of Materials, 2024, pages 3490 to 3495 (abstract record read: scant evidence for compounds that fulfil novelty, credibility and utility). American Chemical Society, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 9Leeman, J., Liu, Y., Stiles, J., Lee, S.B., Bhatt, P., Schoop, L.M. and Palgrave, R.G., Challenges in high-throughput inorganic materials prediction and autonomous synthesis, PRX Energy 3, 011002, 2024 (abstract read on a public repository page: 43 products examined; about two thirds of claimed successes likely known disordered phases). American Physical Society, College Park. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 7Zeni, C. et al., A generative model for inorganic materials design, Nature, 2025, pages 624 to 632 (abstract record read: more than twice as likely to be new and stable; one structure synthesised within 20% of target; first published 16 January 2025). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 17US Geological Survey (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (full report downloaded and read for natural graphite, gallium, rare earths and the foreign trade section; doi 10.3133/mcs2026). USGS, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. doi:10.3133/mcs2026back
  7. 18European Commission (ed.), Critical Raw Materials Act (policy page: 2030 benchmarks of 10% extraction, 40% processing, 25% recycling and no more than 65% from a single third country). Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Brussels. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 14Nature (ed.), LK-99 isn’t a superconductor: how science sleuths solved the mystery, Nature 620, 705, 2023 (news article; the page was opened but only its headline and summary were readable behind the access wall). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 15Nature (ed.), Retraction Note: Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride (published 26 September 2022; the original paper appeared on 14 October 2020; all authors disagreed with the decision). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 16Nature (ed.), Retraction Note: Evidence of near-ambient superconductivity in a N-doped lutetium hydride, Nature, 2023 (publication record read; the note text was not available in the record). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 20International Agency for Research on Cancer (ed.), Some Nanomaterials and Some Fibres, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 111, 2017 (publication page: first assessment of single-walled and multiwalled carbon nanotubes; classifications were not read). IARC, Lyon. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 19European Commission (eds.), Safe and sustainable by design (policy page, revised March 2026) and news article of 8 December 2022 on the Recommendation. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Materials are a discovery claim, a supply chain and a safety question

Part I describes systems and their couplings. It ranks no country or operator and assesses no authority.

6 min read2 figures1 table12 notesNR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

1.1The questions this part answers

Key questions

  • Where is materials risk concentrated?
  • Which couplings carry materials shocks into other systems?
  • Which materials capabilities hold under compound stress?
  • What must 2027 evidence measure first?

In this part

  • Narrative
  • Headline finding
  • Lead figure
  • Five footprint and governance chapters
  • Twelve-domain reading
  • Sector screens
  • Dependency matrix
  • Risk objects
  • Capability ladder
  • Scenario
  • Three lenses
  • Portfolio

1.2The argument

Advanced materials are usually discussed as a race to find new compounds. The 2026 evidence reads them as three things at once: a discovery system whose claims need verification, a supply chain that rests on a few processing countries, and a family of engineered particles whose hazard evidence trails their use51720.

The discovery evidence is large and contested. A study reports 2.2 million predicted structures and 736 independent syntheses5. An autonomous laboratory reports 41 of 58 targets6. Two critiques find that these results do not show new, credible and useful materials89. A 2025 generative model adds one synthesised example7.

The supply evidence is the firmest part. China produced an estimated 82% of natural graphite and 99% of primary low-purity gallium in 2025, and export controls moved three times in a year17. The EU set 2030 benchmarks for extraction, processing and recycling18.

The safety and footprint evidence is the thinnest. IARC assessed carbon nanotubes in 201720, the Commission revised its safe and sustainable by design framework in 202619, and the energy and water use of production is not bound on a common basis. Superconductivity claims show how fast a headline can fall141516.

Figure 1.1How many of its 58 targets did the autonomous laboratory report realising? Compounds

The laboratory reported 41 realised compounds from 58 targets. A 2024 critique examined the products and finds that about two thirds of the claimed successes are likely known disordered phases of the predicted compounds. The two readings are not reconciled in the sources read69.

ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
Targets set58
Reported realised in 17 days41

Source: as cited in the note to this figure. Year 2023.

Figure ID FIG-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-01-003

41compounds

reported realised6

58targets

set from stability data6

17days

continuous operation6

≈2/3of successes

likely known disordered phases, per critique9

1.3Twenty couplings between five systems

The materials-centred matrix types the twenty couplings between the five core systems, read for their materials content. Strengths are Nexus estimates (ESTIMATED) from the cited evidence and analogue events; they set the graph that 2027 evidence will test.

Figure 1.2Couplings between the five systems

Each line is one coupling from one system to another, drawn by the strength the edition assigns. Strengths are Nexus estimates from the cited evidence and analogue events.

  • Strong
  • Moderate
  • Weak

Source: this edition’s coupling matrix (Table 1.1); status Estimated.

Table 1.1Coupling matrix: from the row system to the column system
From, toWATENEFOOHLTBIO
WAT Water·WEAK
water for production, undocumented
WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
ENE EnergyWEAK
framework water harvesting power, disputed
·WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
FOO FoodWEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
·WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
HLT HealthWEAK
workforce
WEAK
workforce
WEAK
no documented link
·WEAK
no documented link
BIO BiodiversityWEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
·
Strength: strong, moderate or weak; a Nexus estimate (status Estimated) from cited evidence and analogue events. The scale is defined in Annex A.

Transmission paths

  1. 01

    TRD → MIN → INF

    An export restriction slows inputs for chips, magnets and electrodes.

    Reported gallium and rare earth controls17

  2. 02

    INF → DAT

    Unverified predictions enter shared databases and are reused.

    Inferred critiques of discovery claims89

  3. 03

    MIN → INF

    Concentrated graphite supply constrains electrode materials.

    Reported natural graphite concentration17

  4. 04

    GOV → MIN

    EU benchmarks set targets for extraction, processing and recycling.

    Reported Critical Raw Materials Act18

  5. 05

    INF → HLT

    New nanomaterials reach exposure before hazard data.

    Inferred IARC assessment20

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 5Merchant, A., Batzner, S., Schoenholz, S.S., Aykol, M., Cheon, G. and Cubuk, E.D., Scaling deep learning for materials discovery, Nature 624, 80 to 85, 2023 (abstract record read: 48,000 known stable crystals; 2.2 million structures below the convex hull; 736 independently realised; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 17US Geological Survey (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (full report downloaded and read for natural graphite, gallium, rare earths and the foreign trade section; doi 10.3133/mcs2026). USGS, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. doi:10.3133/mcs2026back
  3. 20International Agency for Research on Cancer (ed.), Some Nanomaterials and Some Fibres, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 111, 2017 (publication page: first assessment of single-walled and multiwalled carbon nanotubes; classifications were not read). IARC, Lyon. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 6Szymanski, N.J. et al., An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials, Nature 624, 86 to 91, 2023 (abstract record read: 41 compounds from 58 targets in 17 days; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 8Cheetham, A.K. and Seshadri, R., Artificial intelligence driving materials discovery? Perspective on the article Scaling Deep Learning for Materials Discovery, Chemistry of Materials, 2024, pages 3490 to 3495 (abstract record read: scant evidence for compounds that fulfil novelty, credibility and utility). American Chemical Society, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 9Leeman, J., Liu, Y., Stiles, J., Lee, S.B., Bhatt, P., Schoop, L.M. and Palgrave, R.G., Challenges in high-throughput inorganic materials prediction and autonomous synthesis, PRX Energy 3, 011002, 2024 (abstract read on a public repository page: 43 products examined; about two thirds of claimed successes likely known disordered phases). American Physical Society, College Park. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 7Zeni, C. et al., A generative model for inorganic materials design, Nature, 2025, pages 624 to 632 (abstract record read: more than twice as likely to be new and stable; one structure synthesised within 20% of target; first published 16 January 2025). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 18European Commission (ed.), Critical Raw Materials Act (policy page: 2030 benchmarks of 10% extraction, 40% processing, 25% recycling and no more than 65% from a single third country). Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Brussels. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 19European Commission (eds.), Safe and sustainable by design (policy page, revised March 2026) and news article of 8 December 2022 on the Recommendation. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 14Nature (ed.), LK-99 isn’t a superconductor: how science sleuths solved the mystery, Nature 620, 705, 2023 (news article; the page was opened but only its headline and summary were readable behind the access wall). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 15Nature (ed.), Retraction Note: Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride (published 26 September 2022; the original paper appeared on 14 October 2020; all authors disagreed with the decision). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 16Nature (ed.), Retraction Note: Evidence of near-ambient superconductivity in a N-doped lutetium hydride, Nature, 2023 (publication record read; the note text was not available in the record). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Key findings

Twelve findings carry the materials baseline. They are grouped by coupling and never ranked. Each resolves to its source or, where Nexus analysis is involved, to its stated method.

7 min read1 figure0 tables21 notesNR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

2.1Headline finding

ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-MIN-006

China accounted for 99% of world primary low-purity gallium production in 2025, and it imposed, widened and partly suspended export controls on gallium and rare earths between 2023 and 2025.

Figure 2.1China share of world production, 2025
ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
Primary low-purity gallium (%)99
Natural graphite (%)82
Rare earth mine production, derived (%)69

Source: USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 202617. The rare earth value is derived as 270,000 ÷ 390,000 tonnes, method (3).

Implication

Supply of inputs for chips, optoelectronics, batteries and magnets depends on a few processing sites and on trade measures. The United States reported no domestic gallium production since 1987 and a net import reliance of 100%. China lifted its ban on gallium exports to the United States for one year in November 2025 and suspended its October 2025 rare earth controls for one year17.

What would move it

The end of the one-year suspensions in November 2026, new processing projects, and the EU benchmark progress reports would each move this finding.

2.2Infrastructure

  1. ReportedEQL 3NRF-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-001

    A 2023 study reports 2.2 million predicted crystal structures below the known stability line, built on 48,000 known stable crystals, and 736 of the stable structures were independently realised.510

  2. ReportedEQL 3NRF-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-002

    An autonomous laboratory reports realising 41 of 58 target compounds in 17 days of continuous operation.6

  3. ReportedEQL 3NRF-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-003

    Two 2024 critiques dispute the discovery claims: one finds scant evidence for compounds that are novel, credible and useful, and the other finds that about two thirds of the laboratory successes are likely known disordered phases.89

  4. ReportedEQL 2NRF-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-004

    A 2025 generative model reports structures more than twice as likely to be new and stable as earlier methods, with one synthesised structure within 20% of its property target; a company post states a training set of 608,000 stable materials.711

  5. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-011

    Nature retracted a room-temperature superconductivity paper in 2022 and a second in 2023, and a 2023 Nature news report concluded that LK-99 is not a superconductor.141516

2.3Minerals

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-MIN-005

    China produced an estimated 82% of world natural graphite in 2025, and the United States had no domestic production and a net import reliance of 100%.17

  2. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-MIN-006

    China accounted for 99% of world primary low-purity gallium production, and its export controls on gallium and rare earths were imposed, widened and partly suspended between 2023 and 2025.1724

2.4Governance

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-GOV-007

    The EU Critical Raw Materials Act sets 2030 benchmarks of at least 10% of annual consumption from extraction, 40% from processing, 25% from recycling and no more than 65% from one third country.1841

  2. ReportedEQL 3NRF-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-GOV-008

    The Commission adopted a voluntary safe and sustainable by design framework for chemicals and materials on 8 December 2022 and revised it in March 2026.1931

2.5Health

  1. ReportedEQL 3NRF-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-HLT-009

    IARC assessed the carcinogenic hazard of carbon nanotubes, single-walled and multiwalled, for the first time in Monographs Volume 111, published in 2017.2039

2.6Water

  1. ReportedEQL 2NRF-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-WAT-010

    A metal-organic framework device harvested 2.8 litres of water per kilogram of material per day at 20% relative humidity, and a published comment found its efficiency far below existing alternatives.12131

2.7Systemic

  1. Expert inputEQL 2NRF-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-SYS-012

    The leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is reliance on predicted or claimed materials before independent synthesis, while the inputs to make them come from concentrated processing. § scenario

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 17US Geological Survey (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (full report downloaded and read for natural graphite, gallium, rare earths and the foreign trade section; doi 10.3133/mcs2026). USGS, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. doi:10.3133/mcs2026back
  2. 5Merchant, A., Batzner, S., Schoenholz, S.S., Aykol, M., Cheon, G. and Cubuk, E.D., Scaling deep learning for materials discovery, Nature 624, 80 to 85, 2023 (abstract record read: 48,000 known stable crystals; 2.2 million structures below the convex hull; 736 independently realised; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 10Google DeepMind (ed.), Millions of new materials discovered with deep learning (company blog post, 29 November 2023; states 2.2 million new crystals, 380,000 stable, 736 independently created). Google DeepMind, London. Vendor announcement, weak evidence. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 6Szymanski, N.J. et al., An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials, Nature 624, 86 to 91, 2023 (abstract record read: 41 compounds from 58 targets in 17 days; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 8Cheetham, A.K. and Seshadri, R., Artificial intelligence driving materials discovery? Perspective on the article Scaling Deep Learning for Materials Discovery, Chemistry of Materials, 2024, pages 3490 to 3495 (abstract record read: scant evidence for compounds that fulfil novelty, credibility and utility). American Chemical Society, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 9Leeman, J., Liu, Y., Stiles, J., Lee, S.B., Bhatt, P., Schoop, L.M. and Palgrave, R.G., Challenges in high-throughput inorganic materials prediction and autonomous synthesis, PRX Energy 3, 011002, 2024 (abstract read on a public repository page: 43 products examined; about two thirds of claimed successes likely known disordered phases). American Physical Society, College Park. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 7Zeni, C. et al., A generative model for inorganic materials design, Nature, 2025, pages 624 to 632 (abstract record read: more than twice as likely to be new and stable; one structure synthesised within 20% of target; first published 16 January 2025). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 11Microsoft Research (ed.), MatterGen: a new paradigm of materials design with generative AI (company blog post; states a training set of 608,000 stable materials). Microsoft, Redmond. Vendor announcement, weak evidence. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 14Nature (ed.), LK-99 isn’t a superconductor: how science sleuths solved the mystery, Nature 620, 705, 2023 (news article; the page was opened but only its headline and summary were readable behind the access wall). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 15Nature (ed.), Retraction Note: Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride (published 26 September 2022; the original paper appeared on 14 October 2020; all authors disagreed with the decision). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 16Nature (ed.), Retraction Note: Evidence of near-ambient superconductivity in a N-doped lutetium hydride, Nature, 2023 (publication record read; the note text was not available in the record). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 24UNVERIFIED, not opened: IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (refining concentration and export controls), taken from search-result summaries that differ on the top-country shares; the report page returned an access error and no figure from it is used. International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 18European Commission (ed.), Critical Raw Materials Act (policy page: 2030 benchmarks of 10% extraction, 40% processing, 25% recycling and no more than 65% from a single third country). Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Brussels. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Parliament and Council (eds.), Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials, 2024; the legal text was not retrieved, the policy page was read instead [18]. European Union, Brussels. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 19European Commission (eds.), Safe and sustainable by design (policy page, revised March 2026) and news article of 8 December 2022 on the Recommendation. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: Joint Research Centre (ed.), Guidance on the implementation of the Commission Recommendation on the definition of nanomaterial, EUR 31452 EN, 2023, taken from search-result summaries. European Commission, Ispra. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 20International Agency for Research on Cancer (ed.), Some Nanomaterials and Some Fibres, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 111, 2017 (publication page: first assessment of single-walled and multiwalled carbon nanotubes; classifications were not read). IARC, Lyon. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Poland, C.A. et al., Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study, Nature Nanotechnology 3, 423 to 428, 2008, cited from memory. Observation year 2008. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 12Kim, H. et al., Water harvesting from air with metal-organic frameworks powered by natural sunlight, Science 356, 430 to 434, 2017 (abstract record read: 2.8 litres of water per kilogram of MOF per day at relative humidity as low as 20%). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 13Bui, D.T., Chua, K.J. and Gordon, J.M., Comment on Water harvesting from air with metal-organic frameworks powered by natural sunlight, Science, 2017, eaao0791 (abstract record read; the authors of the original paper published a response, eaao3139, that rejects the comparison). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 1Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (ed.), Press release: Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2025, awarded to Kitagawa, Robson and Yaghi for the development of metal-organic frameworks (8 October 2025; uses named: harvesting water from desert air, capturing carbon dioxide, separating PFAS from water). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Systems and sectors at baseline

7 min read0 figures2 tables18 notesNR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

3.1Where each system stood at evidence close

INF · Discovery

Structures predicted below the convex hull

2.2million

of which 736 independently realised.

Reported2023Nature5

INF · Synthesis

Targets realised by the autonomous laboratory

41of 58

17 days of operation; disputed in 2024.

Reported2023Nature6

MIN · Supply

China share of world natural graphite production

82%

US net import reliance is 100%.

Reported2025USGS17

MIN · Supply

China share of primary low-purity gallium

99%

export ban to the US lifted for one year in 2025.

Reported2025USGS17

GOV · Policy

EU 2030 benchmark for processing in the EU

40%

extraction 10%, recycling 25%, one-country cap 65%.

Reported2030 targetEC18

SYS · Cross-system

Superconductivity claims retracted or refuted

3claims

sulfur hydride, lutetium hydride and LK-99.

Reported2022 to 2023Nature141516

3.2Domain posture

Each of the twelve coupled domains is read through materials, in words, not scored. The coupling column names the dependency that carries materials risk into each domain.

Table 3.1Each domain read in words, not scored
DomainPosture at baselineCouplingStatus
WATA metal-organic framework device harvested 2.8 litres per kilogram per day at 20% humidity; its efficiency is disputed.INF → WATReported EQL 2
ENEProduction energy is unpublished; perovskite and silicon tandem cell contacts lose conductivity at elevated temperature.INF → ENEReported EQL 2
FOONo documented coupling at baseline; precision agriculture is listed among national programme applications21.none documentedExpert input EQL 1
HLTCarbon nanotubes were assessed by IARC; mRNA vaccines needed carrier lipid systems.INF ↔ HLTReported EQL 3
BIONo documented coupling at baseline; ecotoxicity evidence by material class is not bound.none documentedExpert input EQL 1
CLIUses in solar cells, storage and carbon capture are claimed; no emissions figure is bound.INF → CLIExpert input EQL 1
INFThe core system: 2.2 million predictions, 736 independent syntheses, disputed verification.the core systemReported EQL 3
FINNo private investment figure was retrieved; public programmes coordinate agencies.FIN → INFExpert input EQL 1
DATMaterials databases and learned models are shared resources that carry unverified entries.INF ↔ DATReported EQL 2
AICMachine-learning models are the main compute coupling in discovery.AIC → INFReported EQL 3
MINProcessing concentration of graphite, gallium and rare earths is the core coupling.MIN → INFReported EQL 4
TRDExport controls on gallium and rare earths were widened and partly suspended in 2025.TRD → MINReported EQL 4

3.3Sector screens

All sixteen sectors are screened for their dependence on materials, on the same grammar as every national edition. The evidence column describes coverage of the baseline evidence, not the performance of the sector.

Table 3.2Sectors: baseline evidence and the exposure to watch
CodeSectorBaseline evidenceExposure to watchEvidence coverage
GS-00Cross-systemmaterials couple to minerals, trade and safety evidenceverification before relianceTHIN
GS-01Waterwater harvesting claim is disputed1213field performanceTHIN
GS-02Energytandem cell stability limit23production footprintTHIN
GS-03Foodno documented couplingnone documentedTHIN
GS-04Healthcarbon nanotube assessment20; mRNA carriers3hazard before evidencePARTIAL
GS-05Financeno investment figure boundunverified claims priced as resultsTHIN
GS-06Developmentaccess to processing and skillswidening gapsTHIN
GS-07Climatefootprint at scale not boundenergy demand of productionTHIN
GS-08Disasterno documented couplingnone documentedTHIN
GS-09Infrastructuregraphite, gallium and magnet inputs17single-country dependencePARTIAL
GS-10Citiesno documented couplingnone documentedTHIN
GS-11Biodiversityno documented couplingnone documentedTHIN
GS-12Earth observationno documented couplingnone documentedTHIN
GS-13Cyber and digitalshared databases and models1122unverified entries reusedTHIN
GS-14PolicyEU raw materials law and design framework1819trade measures and definitionsGOOD
GS-15Sciencestrong peer-reviewed base and open critique5689common verification basisGOOD

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 5Merchant, A., Batzner, S., Schoenholz, S.S., Aykol, M., Cheon, G. and Cubuk, E.D., Scaling deep learning for materials discovery, Nature 624, 80 to 85, 2023 (abstract record read: 48,000 known stable crystals; 2.2 million structures below the convex hull; 736 independently realised; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 6Szymanski, N.J. et al., An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials, Nature 624, 86 to 91, 2023 (abstract record read: 41 compounds from 58 targets in 17 days; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 17US Geological Survey (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (full report downloaded and read for natural graphite, gallium, rare earths and the foreign trade section; doi 10.3133/mcs2026). USGS, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. doi:10.3133/mcs2026back
  4. 18European Commission (ed.), Critical Raw Materials Act (policy page: 2030 benchmarks of 10% extraction, 40% processing, 25% recycling and no more than 65% from a single third country). Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Brussels. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 14Nature (ed.), LK-99 isn’t a superconductor: how science sleuths solved the mystery, Nature 620, 705, 2023 (news article; the page was opened but only its headline and summary were readable behind the access wall). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 15Nature (ed.), Retraction Note: Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride (published 26 September 2022; the original paper appeared on 14 October 2020; all authors disagreed with the decision). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 16Nature (ed.), Retraction Note: Evidence of near-ambient superconductivity in a N-doped lutetium hydride, Nature, 2023 (publication record read; the note text was not available in the record). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 21National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (ed.), About the National Nanotechnology Initiative (programme page: over thirty federal departments, independent agencies and commissions). NNCO, Alexandria. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 12Kim, H. et al., Water harvesting from air with metal-organic frameworks powered by natural sunlight, Science 356, 430 to 434, 2017 (abstract record read: 2.8 litres of water per kilogram of MOF per day at relative humidity as low as 20%). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 13Bui, D.T., Chua, K.J. and Gordon, J.M., Comment on Water harvesting from air with metal-organic frameworks powered by natural sunlight, Science, 2017, eaao0791 (abstract record read; the authors of the original paper published a response, eaao3139, that rejects the comparison). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 23Zhang, B. et al., A cross-linked molecular contact for stable operation of perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells, Science, 2025, pages 837 to 842 (abstract record read: resistance of conventional monomeric contacts rises about sixfold at elevated temperature). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 20International Agency for Research on Cancer (ed.), Some Nanomaterials and Some Fibres, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 111, 2017 (publication page: first assessment of single-walled and multiwalled carbon nanotubes; classifications were not read). IARC, Lyon. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 3Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet (ed.), Press release: The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2023, awarded to Karikó and Weissman for nucleoside base modifications that enabled mRNA vaccines (2 October 2023; the text notes that delivery required carrier lipid systems). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 11Microsoft Research (ed.), MatterGen: a new paradigm of materials design with generative AI (company blog post; states a training set of 608,000 stable materials). Microsoft, Redmond. Vendor announcement, weak evidence. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 22Materials Genome Initiative (ed.), MGI home page (programme page: a federal multi-agency initiative for discovering, manufacturing and deploying advanced materials twice as fast and at a fraction of the cost). US Government, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 19European Commission (eds.), Safe and sustainable by design (policy page, revised March 2026) and news article of 8 December 2022 on the Recommendation. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 8Cheetham, A.K. and Seshadri, R., Artificial intelligence driving materials discovery? Perspective on the article Scaling Deep Learning for Materials Discovery, Chemistry of Materials, 2024, pages 3490 to 3495 (abstract record read: scant evidence for compounds that fulfil novelty, credibility and utility). American Chemical Society, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 9Leeman, J., Liu, Y., Stiles, J., Lee, S.B., Bhatt, P., Schoop, L.M. and Palgrave, R.G., Challenges in high-throughput inorganic materials prediction and autonomous synthesis, PRX Energy 3, 011002, 2024 (abstract read on a public repository page: 43 products examined; about two thirds of claimed successes likely known disordered phases). American Physical Society, College Park. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Risks and capability

Four materials risk objects open the portfolio. Order carries no rank. Each is read across driver, exposure, vulnerability, capacity, cascade and consequence.

6 min read0 figures1 table19 notesNR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

4.1Risk objects

Each risk is read across the chain from hazard to consequence, with its status and evidence-quality level.

  1. InferredEQL 3RSK-XT12-VER-001

    Verification gap for predicted materials

    Driver
    predictions outpace independent synthesis59
    Exposure
    research planning and users of shared databases
    Vulnerability
    disordered phases read as new compounds9
    Capacity
    independent synthesis and crystallography expertise8
    Cascade
    INF → DAT
    Horizon
    1 to 5 years
  2. InferredEQL 4RSK-XT12-SUP-002

    Processing concentration and export controls

    Driver
    concentrated processing and changing trade measures1724
    Exposure
    chips, optoelectronics, batteries and magnets
    Vulnerability
    few processing sites; no domestic production in some markets
    Capacity
    EU benchmarks; new projects in several countries1718
    Cascade
    MIN → INF
    Horizon
    1 to 5 years
  3. InferredEQL 3RSK-XT12-SAF-003

    Nanomaterial hazard ahead of evidence

    Driver
    new engineered materials in use2025
    Exposure
    workers, consumers and environments near production
    Vulnerability
    definitions that differ by jurisdiction2526
    Capacity
    hazard assessment, reporting rules and design frameworks1927
    Cascade
    INF → HLT
    Horizon
    1 to 10 years
  4. Expert inputEQL 2RSK-XT12-CLM-004

    Claims outrun replication

    Driver
    high-profile claims on thin data141516
    Exposure
    investors, agencies and public debate
    Vulnerability
    headline reach exceeds correction reach
    Capacity
    independent replication; editorial correction1516
    Cascade
    INF → FIN
    Horizon
    1 to 5 years

4.2Capability ladder

Existence is not readiness. Each of the fifteen capability functions is placed on the ladder by the strongest public evidence for materials at the global level.

Table 4.1Capabilities on the ladder of evidence: listed, exists, demonstrated, tested
FunctionRungLevelStrongest public evidence at baseline
Prevention and mitigationEXISTSEU safe and sustainable by design framework and raw materials benchmarks1819
Monitoring and observationEXISTSannual national mineral statistics17
Early warningLISTEDno common tracker of trade measures or discovery claims
Preparedness and planningEXISTSEU benchmarks and national programmes1821
Redundancy and reservesLISTEDstockpile data not consolidated here17
ResponseLISTEDno tested response to a sudden input cut-off
Continuity of critical servicesLISTEDnot reviewed
RecoveryLISTEDnot applicable at baseline; no event to recover from
AdaptationLISTEDmaterial substitution not reviewed
Social protectionLISTEDnot applicable at baseline
Finance and insuranceLISTEDno investment figure bound
Institutional coordinationEXISTSstandards committees and national programmes21222830
Technical infrastructureEXISTSshared databases and autonomous laboratories exist622
WorkforceLISTEDskills gaps reported in general; no figure bound
Research capacityADEQUATEstrong peer-reviewed base and open critique589
A capability listed in policy is not a tested one; each rung is the strongest public evidence at baseline.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 5Merchant, A., Batzner, S., Schoenholz, S.S., Aykol, M., Cheon, G. and Cubuk, E.D., Scaling deep learning for materials discovery, Nature 624, 80 to 85, 2023 (abstract record read: 48,000 known stable crystals; 2.2 million structures below the convex hull; 736 independently realised; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 9Leeman, J., Liu, Y., Stiles, J., Lee, S.B., Bhatt, P., Schoop, L.M. and Palgrave, R.G., Challenges in high-throughput inorganic materials prediction and autonomous synthesis, PRX Energy 3, 011002, 2024 (abstract read on a public repository page: 43 products examined; about two thirds of claimed successes likely known disordered phases). American Physical Society, College Park. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 8Cheetham, A.K. and Seshadri, R., Artificial intelligence driving materials discovery? Perspective on the article Scaling Deep Learning for Materials Discovery, Chemistry of Materials, 2024, pages 3490 to 3495 (abstract record read: scant evidence for compounds that fulfil novelty, credibility and utility). American Chemical Society, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 17US Geological Survey (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (full report downloaded and read for natural graphite, gallium, rare earths and the foreign trade section; doi 10.3133/mcs2026). USGS, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. doi:10.3133/mcs2026back
  5. 24UNVERIFIED, not opened: IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (refining concentration and export controls), taken from search-result summaries that differ on the top-country shares; the report page returned an access error and no figure from it is used. International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 18European Commission (ed.), Critical Raw Materials Act (policy page: 2030 benchmarks of 10% extraction, 40% processing, 25% recycling and no more than 65% from a single third country). Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Brussels. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 20International Agency for Research on Cancer (ed.), Some Nanomaterials and Some Fibres, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 111, 2017 (publication page: first assessment of single-walled and multiwalled carbon nanotubes; classifications were not read). IARC, Lyon. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 25UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Commission (ed.), Commission Recommendation of 10 June 2022 on the definition of nanomaterial, 2022/C 229/01 (50% number-based test; replaces the 2011 text), taken from search-result summaries. European Commission, Brussels. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Commission (ed.), Regulation (EU) 2018/1881 amending the REACH annexes for nanoforms, applying from 2020, cited from memory. European Union, Brussels. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 19European Commission (eds.), Safe and sustainable by design (policy page, revised March 2026) and news article of 8 December 2022 on the Recommendation. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Environmental Protection Agency (ed.), Chemical substances when manufactured or processed as nanoscale materials, TSCA reporting and recordkeeping requirements, final rule, January 2017, cited from memory; the page returned an automated-access block. EPA, Washington. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 14Nature (ed.), LK-99 isn’t a superconductor: how science sleuths solved the mystery, Nature 620, 705, 2023 (news article; the page was opened but only its headline and summary were readable behind the access wall). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 15Nature (ed.), Retraction Note: Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride (published 26 September 2022; the original paper appeared on 14 October 2020; all authors disagreed with the decision). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 16Nature (ed.), Retraction Note: Evidence of near-ambient superconductivity in a N-doped lutetium hydride, Nature, 2023 (publication record read; the note text was not available in the record). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 21National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (ed.), About the National Nanotechnology Initiative (programme page: over thirty federal departments, independent agencies and commissions). NNCO, Alexandria. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 22Materials Genome Initiative (ed.), MGI home page (programme page: a federal multi-agency initiative for discovering, manufacturing and deploying advanced materials twice as fast and at a fraction of the cost). US Government, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: OECD (ed.), Working Party on Manufactured Nanomaterials programme and test guidelines, cited from memory; the page returned an automated-access block. OECD, Paris. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO (ed.), ISO/TC 229 Nanotechnologies, technical committee, cited from memory; the page returned an automated-access block. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 6Szymanski, N.J. et al., An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials, Nature 624, 86 to 91, 2023 (abstract record read: 41 compounds from 58 targets in 17 days; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Reliance on claimed materials before independent synthesis

A conditional statement under stated assumptions, never a prediction.

2 min read0 figures0 tables4 notesNR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

5.1Assumptions

Scenario SCN-XT12-VER-01: what is assumed, and what is held constant.

Baseline
the 2026 reference state in this edition
Drivers
a claimed material enters planning while processing of its inputs stays concentrated
Analogues
the 2022 to 2023 superconductivity claims; the 2024 critiques of discovery results9141516
Interventions
none modelled: the specification describes the unmitigated case
Run state
narrative specification; quantified run scheduled for 2027

5.2The cascade, step by step

  1. 1

    INF → DAT

    a claimed compound enters shared databases

    2023

  2. 2

    DAT → FIN

    funding and planning follow the claim

    2024

  3. 3

    TRD → MIN

    demand for inputs meets export controls

    2025

  4. 4

    INF → INF

    independent synthesis fails to confirm the claim

    2024

  5. 5

    GOV → INF

    agencies revise verification expectations

    2026

  6. 6

    FIN → INF

    funding shifts toward verification and substitution

    2025

5.3The scenario as a table of steps

How the shock in scenario SCN-XT12-VER-01 would travel through Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology’s coupled systems, step by step, under the assumptions the edition states.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Infrastructure to datA claimed compound enters shared databases. Analogue or source: 2023.Edition XT-12, scenario SCN-XT12-VER-01, step 1
02 DAT to financeFunding and planning follow the claim. Analogue or source: 2024.Edition XT-12, scenario SCN-XT12-VER-01, step 2
03 Trade to mineralsDemand for inputs meets export controls. Analogue or source: 2025.Edition XT-12, scenario SCN-XT12-VER-01, step 3
04 Infrastructure to infrastructureIndependent synthesis fails to confirm the claim. Analogue or source: 2024.Edition XT-12, scenario SCN-XT12-VER-01, step 4
05 Governance to infrastructureAgencies revise verification expectations. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition XT-12, scenario SCN-XT12-VER-01, step 5
06 Finance to infrastructureFunding shifts toward verification and substitution. Analogue or source: 2025.Edition XT-12, scenario SCN-XT12-VER-01, step 6

A teaching model of a conditional scenario under the edition’s stated assumptions: not a forecast, not a prediction and not a warning. Sources: Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology 2026, scenario SCN-XT12-VER-01 (2026); Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology 2026, references (NR-CIT-1) (2026).

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 9Leeman, J., Liu, Y., Stiles, J., Lee, S.B., Bhatt, P., Schoop, L.M. and Palgrave, R.G., Challenges in high-throughput inorganic materials prediction and autonomous synthesis, PRX Energy 3, 011002, 2024 (abstract read on a public repository page: 43 products examined; about two thirds of claimed successes likely known disordered phases). American Physical Society, College Park. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 14Nature (ed.), LK-99 isn’t a superconductor: how science sleuths solved the mystery, Nature 620, 705, 2023 (news article; the page was opened but only its headline and summary were readable behind the access wall). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 15Nature (ed.), Retraction Note: Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride (published 26 September 2022; the original paper appeared on 14 October 2020; all authors disagreed with the decision). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 16Nature (ed.), Retraction Note: Evidence of near-ambient superconductivity in a N-doped lutetium hydride, Nature, 2023 (publication record read; the note text was not available in the record). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Readings from the other desks

The materials baseline is read through each steward’s lens, then once as a whole. Each lens is a projection of reviewed findings, not a separate argument. The other desks’ own editions of this subject are listed first, as cross-references, not copies.

15 min read0 figures8 tables36 notesNR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

6.1The other desks’ editions of this subject

Federation: each desk writes its own edition for the subjects in its remit. Until a desk releases, its edition shows its frame and the reading this edition printed for it.

DeskEditionStateIdentifier
GCRI Systems EvidenceNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
GRF Public DeliberationOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
GRA Capital ReadinessOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
Standards ProgressNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
Academy CapabilityNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
Index MeasurementOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit

6.2Three lenses

One edition, read by each steward. The lens of this site comes first.

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports reading advanced materials as a discovery system with a verification gap, a supply chain with concentrated processing, and a safety question with thin coverage. Evidence is strongest for production statistics and single papers, and weakest for verification rates, hazard coverage and footprint.

INF-001 · INF-003 · MIN-006 · SYS-012

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people the materials story arrives as a headline about a breakthrough, a shortage or a hazard. The baseline asks that public debate separate predictions from syntheses, and claims from corrections.

INF-003 · INF-011 · MIN-005

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. Private investment was not retrieved, supply depends on a few processing sites, and verification has costs that fall on research users. These show where finance-readiness evidence will matter. Nothing here is advice, a rating or an approval.

MIN-006 · INF-003

NEXUS

Synthesis

Materials are well described by single results and thinly measured as a system. The 2027 programme should bind verification rates, map processing capacity and test the claim-reliance pathway before the next headline.

SYS-012 · M-01 · M-02

6.3Standards, Academy and steward contributions

How the Nexus Standards drafts, the Risk Academy and the three stewards feed each quarterly edition for materials. The standards are a preparatory working draft (2026) and are cited as drafts, never as adopted standards.

Table 6.1The quarterly rhythm every edition follows
QuarterEditionQuestionBoundary
Q1State and AgendaWhat matters this year, and what is the starting position?observed baseline stays distinct from planned work
Q2Evidence and BuildWhat new evidence and capability exist?a configured capability is not a validated result
Q3Stress Test and ReadinessWhat do scenarios and tests show?simulated loss or performance is not observed impact
Q4Annual Synthesis and RenewalWhat changed in the year, and what renews?release follows review, not event publicity deadlines
Table 6.2Who contributes what each quarter
Steward or bodyRoleContribution route
GCRI CanadaLead Institution and Consortium Secretariat; publisher of record; technical truth (key T)science and practice communities · GCRI gateway
The Global Risks Forum (GRF)leadership, dialogue and the Universe programme; public meaning (key M)policy, Universe and national adoption · GRF gateway
The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)finance, insurance and development readiness; capital meaning (key F)finance and insurance · GRA gateway
Nexus Standardspreparatory drafts on vocabulary, hazards, indicators and methodsStandards site · working groups HAZ, IND, MTH, FIN, AI
Risk Academylearning pathways tied to the agenda questionsAcademy gateway · learning by review
Nexus Standards and Academytechnology chapter inputs: GCRI evidence, NXS standards, RA capabilitytechnology editorial board

Standards drafts used in this edition

  • Risk vocabulary NRS-C1 (424 terms) for terms in the glossary
  • Hazard atlas NHS-1 1.1.0 (905 hazards in 120 families) for risk objects
  • Seven risk classes: global, catastrophic, existential, emerging, planetary, exponential, frontier-tech

Standards calendar to watch

  • Founding calls from 20 October 2026; working groups meet from 5 November 2026
  • Inaugural Global Standards Council session, 12 January 2027
  • Quarterly reviews in March, June, September and December, aligned with each edition

6.4GCRI reading: the model card

GCRI’s reading of this edition is its model card: what the national model is, what it computes and where it stops. It is printed in full in Annex A, with the methods it belongs to. Annex A, methodology

6.5Global Risks Forum reading: editorial essays

Four signed essays by the Reports editorial team set out the positions this edition takes. They are interpretation, labelled as such; the evidence they draw on is in the findings register.

Advanced materials are a discovery system, a supply chain and a safety question. The first is fast and contested, the second is slow and physical, and the third is thinly measured. Keeping them apart avoids both hype and complacency.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 01

Three stories, one field

A predicted structure, a robot-made powder and a press post carry different weight. This edition labels each, and asks for a common basis before counts of new materials are compared.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 02

Separate predictions, syntheses and claims

Mining shares are published. Processing, refining and component capacity by country are not, and they decide where a restriction bites.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 03

Processing is the blind spot

Hazard evidence arrives after use unless it is built into design. Voluntary frameworks, definitions and reporting rules are the first tools, and their coverage is uneven.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 04

Safety is part of design

6.6Global Risks Alliance reading: 2027 materials readiness pack

The registers that open the 2027 global cycle. At baseline each is initialised from this edition.

Table 6.32027 materials readiness pack
ItemRegisterState at baselineFirst 2027 entry
E1Materials risk state deltabaseline set by this editionchanges against the baseline
E2WEFH+B state deltafive global system readings setindicator updates and freshness
E3Agenda and Portfolio movementeight agenda items · 6 proposed objectsadmission decisions
E4Federation delivery registernational chapters in preparationnational chapters
E5Consortium capability registernational consortia formingfirst contributions
E6Leadership questions and challengesnone yetfirst challenge log
E7Foundry technical statenational environments preparedfirst federation cut
E8Publication candidatestwelve findings carried forwardPUBLISH · HOLD dispositions
E9Universe readinessone candidate missionadmission and role spine
E10Correction registernonefirst federation-wide cycle

Publication dispositions

  • Publish
  • Hold
  • Needs evidence
  • Restricted
  • Superseded

6.7Nexus Standards reading: standards and regulatory watch

Instruments and published guidance that shape the systems in this edition, by status on the retrieval date. The edition assesses no one’s compliance.

  • IN FORCE
  • PUBLISHED
  • DRAFT
  • PUBLISHED · VOLUNTARY
Table 6.4Standards and regulatory watch
InstrumentBodyScopeStatusRelevance
Critical Raw Materials Act1841European UnionEUIN FORCEsupply benchmarks
Nanomaterial definition2531European CommissionEUPUBLISHED 2022definition
Nanoform registration under REACH26European UnionEUIN FORCEregistration
Safe and sustainable by design framework19European CommissionEUPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYdesign framework
Nanoscale reporting rule under TSCA27US EPAUSIN FORCEreporting
OECD programme on manufactured nanomaterials28OECDOECD membersPUBLISHEDtesting guidance
ISO/TS 80004-129ISOglobalPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYvocabulary
ISO/TC 229 on nanotechnologies30ISOglobalCOMMITTEE ACTIVEstandards programme
IARC Monographs Volume 11120IARCglobalPUBLISHED 2017hazard assessment
Materials Genome Initiative22US federal agenciesUSPROGRAMME ACTIVEdiscovery infrastructure

Changed since 2024

  • The Commission revised the safe and sustainable by design Recommendation in March 202619
  • China suspended its October 2025 rare earth controls for one year in November 202517
  • China lifted its ban on gallium exports to the United States for one year in November 202517

To watch in 2027

  • The end of the one-year suspensions of Chinese export measures in November 202617
  • Progress against the 2030 benchmarks of the Critical Raw Materials Act18
  • Testing and revision of the nanomaterial definition and the design framework1925

6.8Risk Academy reading: literature and evidence review, science and assessments

The review behind this edition covers materials assessments, peer-reviewed science and the institutional reports that bind its findings. Systematic reviews for each agenda item begin in 2027.

Review protocol

Question
What does the published evidence establish about advanced materials and nanotechnology as infrastructure and its couplings?
Sources searched
peer-reviewed journals; standards bodies and agencies; strategies; supply statistics and company posts
Window
releases available at evidence close, 30 September 2026
Selection
sources that bind or contextualise a finding in this edition
Next step
systematic reviews for agenda items 01 to 05 in 2027
Table 6.5Peer-reviewed discovery papers and critiques
ReferenceTypeYearRoleUsed for
Merchant et al.5journal article2023supportspredicted structures
Szymanski et al.6journal article2023supportsautonomous synthesis
Zeni et al.7journal article2025supportsgenerative design
Cheetham and Seshadri8journal article2024disputesnovelty and utility
Leeman et al.9journal article2024disputesphase identification
Jain et al.38journal article2013frameworkmaterials database
Zhang et al.23journal article2025contexttandem cell stability
Table 6.6Foundational materials papers
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Novoselov et al.35journal article2004frameworkgraphene
Li et al.36journal article1999frameworkmetal-organic frameworks
Iijima37journal article1991frameworkcarbon nanotubes
Brus42journal article1984frameworkquantum dots
Poland et al.39journal article2008contextnanotube hazard
Hou et al.40journal article2021contextlipid nanoparticles
Kim et al.12journal article2017supportswater harvesting
Bui, Chua and Gordon13journal comment2017disputeswater harvesting efficiency
Table 6.7Standards, policy and strategies
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Critical Raw Materials Act page18European Commission2024supportsbenchmarks
Regulation (EU) 2024/125241European Union2024contextlegal text
Safe and sustainable by design pages19European Commission2026supportsdesign framework
Nanomaterial definition25European Commission2022contextdefinition
IARC Monographs Volume 11120IARC2017supportshazard assessment
Table 6.8Supply, field milestones and company posts
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Mineral Commodity Summaries 202617USGS2026supportsproduction and trade
Critical Minerals Outlook 202624IEA2026contextprocessing concentration
Discovery post10Google DeepMind2023contextvendor claim
MatterGen post11Microsoft Research2025contextvendor claim
Nobel Prize press releases1234prize committees2010 to 2025contextfield milestones
National programme pages2122US programmes2026contextprogrammes

Where the evidence agrees

  • Predicted structures far outnumber verified syntheses59
  • Processing of several inputs is concentrated in one country17
  • Hazard assessment of engineered nanomaterials lags their use2019

Where it is unsettled

  • How many claimed new materials are new, credible and useful689
  • How efficient framework water harvesting is against alternatives1213
  • How concentrated processing is by country, beyond mine and primary production1724

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 18European Commission (ed.), Critical Raw Materials Act (policy page: 2030 benchmarks of 10% extraction, 40% processing, 25% recycling and no more than 65% from a single third country). Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Brussels. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Parliament and Council (eds.), Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials, 2024; the legal text was not retrieved, the policy page was read instead [18]. European Union, Brussels. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 25UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Commission (ed.), Commission Recommendation of 10 June 2022 on the definition of nanomaterial, 2022/C 229/01 (50% number-based test; replaces the 2011 text), taken from search-result summaries. European Commission, Brussels. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: Joint Research Centre (ed.), Guidance on the implementation of the Commission Recommendation on the definition of nanomaterial, EUR 31452 EN, 2023, taken from search-result summaries. European Commission, Ispra. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Commission (ed.), Regulation (EU) 2018/1881 amending the REACH annexes for nanoforms, applying from 2020, cited from memory. European Union, Brussels. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 19European Commission (eds.), Safe and sustainable by design (policy page, revised March 2026) and news article of 8 December 2022 on the Recommendation. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Environmental Protection Agency (ed.), Chemical substances when manufactured or processed as nanoscale materials, TSCA reporting and recordkeeping requirements, final rule, January 2017, cited from memory; the page returned an automated-access block. EPA, Washington. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: OECD (ed.), Working Party on Manufactured Nanomaterials programme and test guidelines, cited from memory; the page returned an automated-access block. OECD, Paris. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 29UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO (ed.), ISO/TS 80004-1, Nanotechnologies: vocabulary, part 1, core terms, cited from memory. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. Observation year 2015. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO (ed.), ISO/TC 229 Nanotechnologies, technical committee, cited from memory; the page returned an automated-access block. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 20International Agency for Research on Cancer (ed.), Some Nanomaterials and Some Fibres, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 111, 2017 (publication page: first assessment of single-walled and multiwalled carbon nanotubes; classifications were not read). IARC, Lyon. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 22Materials Genome Initiative (ed.), MGI home page (programme page: a federal multi-agency initiative for discovering, manufacturing and deploying advanced materials twice as fast and at a fraction of the cost). US Government, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 17US Geological Survey (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (full report downloaded and read for natural graphite, gallium, rare earths and the foreign trade section; doi 10.3133/mcs2026). USGS, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. doi:10.3133/mcs2026back
  14. 5Merchant, A., Batzner, S., Schoenholz, S.S., Aykol, M., Cheon, G. and Cubuk, E.D., Scaling deep learning for materials discovery, Nature 624, 80 to 85, 2023 (abstract record read: 48,000 known stable crystals; 2.2 million structures below the convex hull; 736 independently realised; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 6Szymanski, N.J. et al., An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials, Nature 624, 86 to 91, 2023 (abstract record read: 41 compounds from 58 targets in 17 days; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 7Zeni, C. et al., A generative model for inorganic materials design, Nature, 2025, pages 624 to 632 (abstract record read: more than twice as likely to be new and stable; one structure synthesised within 20% of target; first published 16 January 2025). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 8Cheetham, A.K. and Seshadri, R., Artificial intelligence driving materials discovery? Perspective on the article Scaling Deep Learning for Materials Discovery, Chemistry of Materials, 2024, pages 3490 to 3495 (abstract record read: scant evidence for compounds that fulfil novelty, credibility and utility). American Chemical Society, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 9Leeman, J., Liu, Y., Stiles, J., Lee, S.B., Bhatt, P., Schoop, L.M. and Palgrave, R.G., Challenges in high-throughput inorganic materials prediction and autonomous synthesis, PRX Energy 3, 011002, 2024 (abstract read on a public repository page: 43 products examined; about two thirds of claimed successes likely known disordered phases). American Physical Society, College Park. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: Jain, A. et al., Commentary: The Materials Project, a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1, 011002, 2013, cited from memory. Observation year 2013. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 23Zhang, B. et al., A cross-linked molecular contact for stable operation of perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells, Science, 2025, pages 837 to 842 (abstract record read: resistance of conventional monomeric contacts rises about sixfold at elevated temperature). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: Novoselov, K.S. et al., Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films, Science 306, 666 to 669, 2004, cited from memory. Observation year 2004. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: Li, H., Eddaoudi, M., O’Keeffe, M. and Yaghi, O.M., Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework, Nature 402, 276 to 279, 1999, cited from memory. Observation year 1999. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 37UNVERIFIED, not opened: Iijima, S., Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon, Nature 354, 56 to 58, 1991, cited from memory. Observation year 1991. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  24. 42UNVERIFIED, not opened: Brus, L.E., Electron-electron and electron-hole interactions in small semiconductor crystallites: the size dependence of the lowest excited electronic state, Journal of Chemical Physics 80, 4403 to 4409, 1984, cited from memory. Observation year 1984. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  25. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Poland, C.A. et al., Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study, Nature Nanotechnology 3, 423 to 428, 2008, cited from memory. Observation year 2008. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  26. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: Hou, X., Zaks, T., Langer, R. and Dong, Y., Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery, Nature Reviews Materials 6, 1078 to 1094, 2021, cited from memory. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  27. 12Kim, H. et al., Water harvesting from air with metal-organic frameworks powered by natural sunlight, Science 356, 430 to 434, 2017 (abstract record read: 2.8 litres of water per kilogram of MOF per day at relative humidity as low as 20%). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  28. 13Bui, D.T., Chua, K.J. and Gordon, J.M., Comment on Water harvesting from air with metal-organic frameworks powered by natural sunlight, Science, 2017, eaao0791 (abstract record read; the authors of the original paper published a response, eaao3139, that rejects the comparison). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  29. 24UNVERIFIED, not opened: IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (refining concentration and export controls), taken from search-result summaries that differ on the top-country shares; the report page returned an access error and no figure from it is used. International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  30. 10Google DeepMind (ed.), Millions of new materials discovered with deep learning (company blog post, 29 November 2023; states 2.2 million new crystals, 380,000 stable, 736 independently created). Google DeepMind, London. Vendor announcement, weak evidence. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  31. 11Microsoft Research (ed.), MatterGen: a new paradigm of materials design with generative AI (company blog post; states a training set of 608,000 stable materials). Microsoft, Redmond. Vendor announcement, weak evidence. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  32. 1Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (ed.), Press release: Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2025, awarded to Kitagawa, Robson and Yaghi for the development of metal-organic frameworks (8 October 2025; uses named: harvesting water from desert air, capturing carbon dioxide, separating PFAS from water). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  33. 2Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (ed.), Press release: The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2023, awarded to Bawendi, Brus and Yekimov for the discovery and synthesis of quantum dots (4 October 2023). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  34. 3Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet (ed.), Press release: The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2023, awarded to Karikó and Weissman for nucleoside base modifications that enabled mRNA vaccines (2 October 2023; the text notes that delivery required carrier lipid systems). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  35. 4Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (ed.), Press release: The Nobel Prize in Physics 2010, awarded to Geim and Novoselov for experiments on the two-dimensional material graphene (5 October 2010). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2010. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  36. 21National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (ed.), About the National Nanotechnology Initiative (programme page: over thirty federal departments, independent agencies and commissions). NNCO, Alexandria. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

The 2027 agenda

Eight bounded questions open the 2027 materials agenda. Each comes from a baseline finding, names the initiative that will carry it and the first output due in the 2027 materials edition.

5 min read0 figures6 tables4 notesNR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

7.1Questions for the operational series

  1. M-01

    Which predicted materials have been independently synthesised and characterised, and what share are new?

    INI-XT12-VER-01 · verification of predicted materials; first output: verification register.

  2. M-02

    How concentrated is processing, not only mining, of graphite, gallium, rare earths and other inputs, by country?

    INI-XT12-SUP-02 · supply concentration; first output: processing map.

  3. M-03

    What hazard and exposure evidence exists for each class of engineered nanomaterial in use?

    INI-XT12-SAF-03 · nanosafety evidence; first output: evidence table by class.

  4. M-04

    How do definitions of nanomaterial differ across jurisdictions, and what do they change in practice?

    INI-XT12-DEF-04 · definitions; first output: definition overlay.

  5. M-05

    What energy and water does materials production use per unit of output?

    INI-XT12-FPR-05 · production footprint; first output: footprint estimates.

  6. M-06

    Which national strategies set targets for materials supply?

    To be admitted in 2027; first output: strategy overlay.

  7. M-07

    What workforce exists for synthesis, characterisation and nanosafety?

    To be admitted in 2027; first output: scoping note.

  8. M-08

    Which readiness capabilities have been tested in real supply disruptions, and which are only planned?

    Readiness capability register; first output: rung evidence for 15 functions.

7.2Portfolio proposed for the Q1 2027 alignment

Five initiatives and one Universe mission candidate are proposed for the 2027 materials portfolio. They are programme objects: no partner, funder or member is attached to them in this edition.

Table 7.1Objects proposed for the first operational quarter
IDObjectKindQuestionState
INI-XT12-VER-01Verification of predicted materialsInitiativeM-01PROPOSED
INI-XT12-SUP-02Supply concentrationInitiativeM-02PROPOSED
INI-XT12-SAF-03Nanosafety evidenceInitiativeM-03PROPOSED
INI-XT12-DEF-04DefinitionsInitiativeM-04PROPOSED
INI-XT12-FPR-05Production footprintInitiativeM-05PROPOSED
MSN-XT12-2027-01Claim-reliance Universe missionMissionM-01Candidate

7.3The pathway

The materials edition reads national readiness chapters, the coupled sector reports on energy and minerals, and the global edition through one governed evidence graph. At baseline the federation is designed; the global energy and lifeline editions are drafted. This page states what exists today and what comes next.

  1. 01

    National readiness chapters

    materials supply and nanosafety readiness in each national edition

    IN PREPARATION · national baselines

  2. 02

    Sector couplings

    GS-02 energy · XT-10 cryptography · SR-04 minerals

    GS-02 DRAFTED · sector baselines

  3. 03

    Technology system model

    discovery, supply, safety, footprint, governance

    v0 SPECIFIED · v1 with federation evidence

  4. 04

    Strategic links

    SR-02 lifeline systems · SR-13 strategic technology

    PLANNED · strategic baselines

  5. 05

    Universe

    annual proving environment

    CANDIDATE MISSION · mandate in 2027

  6. 06

    XT-12 report

    this series

    BASELINE DRAFT · 2027 annual edition

  7. 07

    Evidence and correction

    one graph, many projections

    OPEN · first correction cycle in 2027

7.4Universe 2027: evidence pack for the materials candidate mission

  1. 01

    Mandate

  2. 02

    Core Build · 1 month

  3. 03

    Action · 1 week

  4. 04

    Evidence seal

  5. 05

    Portfolio correction

  6. 06

    Next mandate

Table 7.2Universe 2027: evidence pack for the materials candidate mission
ItemRecordStateTiming
F1Annual mandate recordPLANNEDafter the Q2 2027 alignment
F2Core Build recordPLANNEDone month before the exercise
F3Exercise evidencePLANNEDduring the Action week
F4Decision packetsPLANNEDexercise state only
F5Proof receiptsPLANNEDscoped to each recorded check
F6After-action reportPLANNEDwithin one quarter
F7Upgrade docketPLANNEDrouted to the Portfolio
F8Portfolio renewalPLANNED2027 global annual edition
F9Public synthesisPLANNEDpublic-safe extracts only

Mission

ID
MSN-XT12-2027-01 · Claim-reliance Universe mission
Role spine
Leadership sponsor · Institutional anchor · Mission lead: drawn from national pathways
Receiving actors
to be identified with the mandate

7.5Handoffs and routing

Where the baseline’s findings go next. A handoff routes a finding for awareness, review or work; it transfers no authority.

Table 7.3Handoffs and routing
FindingRouted toPurposeClass
INF-001 · predicted structuresINI-XT12-VER-01verification of predicted materialsPUBLIC
INF-003 · disputed claimsINI-XT12-VER-01verification of predicted materialsPUBLIC
MIN-005 · graphiteINI-XT12-SUP-02supply concentrationPUBLIC
MIN-006 · gallium and rare earthsINI-XT12-SUP-02supply concentrationPUBLIC
GOV-007 · raw materials lawregional consortiadefinition overlayPUBLIC
GOV-008 · design frameworkINI-XT12-DEF-04definitionsPUBLIC
HLT-009 · nanotube hazardINI-XT12-SAF-03 · key F reviewnanosafety evidencePUBLIC
SYS-012 · compound pathwayMSN-XT12-2027-01Universe candidateCONSORTIUM
Table 7.4Routing rules by publication class
ClassWhere it goesWho can see it
PUBLICthe published edition and its evidence bundleanyone
CONSORTIUMgoverned rooms of the federationconsortium members under agreement
CONTROLLEDneed-to-know channelsnamed competent actors only

7.6Feeds and signal register

Table 7.5Feeds watched from 2027
FeedProducerLatencyFeeds into
Journals and preprints on materials prediction and synthesispeer review and preprintscontinuousINF-003
Mineral commodity summariesUSGSannualMIN-006
Raw materials pagesEuropean Commissionper releaseGOV-007
Safe and sustainable by design pagesEuropean Commission and JRCper releaseGOV-008
IARC MonographsIARCper volumeHLT-009
Company announcements on discovery toolscompaniesper eventINF-004
Retraction notes and editorial noticesjournalsper eventINF-011

Escalation routes

  • none · keep monitoring
  • research question
  • project
  • risk object
  • annual publication
  • signal report
Table 7.6Signals at baseline
IDSignalCorroborationSystemsRoute
SIG-XT12-001Independent critiques of autonomous synthesis results9CORROBORATEDINFresearch question M-01
SIG-XT12-002Export controls on gallium and rare earths suspended for one year in November 202517PARTIALMIN · TRDinitiative M-02
SIG-XT12-003Retractions of superconductivity claims1516CORROBORATEDINF · SYSresearch question M-01

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 9Leeman, J., Liu, Y., Stiles, J., Lee, S.B., Bhatt, P., Schoop, L.M. and Palgrave, R.G., Challenges in high-throughput inorganic materials prediction and autonomous synthesis, PRX Energy 3, 011002, 2024 (abstract read on a public repository page: 43 products examined; about two thirds of claimed successes likely known disordered phases). American Physical Society, College Park. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 17US Geological Survey (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (full report downloaded and read for natural graphite, gallium, rare earths and the foreign trade section; doi 10.3133/mcs2026). USGS, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. doi:10.3133/mcs2026back
  3. 15Nature (ed.), Retraction Note: Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride (published 26 September 2022; the original paper appeared on 14 October 2020; all authors disagreed with the decision). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 16Nature (ed.), Retraction Note: Evidence of near-ambient superconductivity in a N-doped lutetium hydride, Nature, 2023 (publication record read; the note text was not available in the record). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Systems in depth

One section per system: its state at evidence close, its exposures and what the operational series will watch.

10 min read0 figures5 tables29 notesNR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

8.1Discovery, synthesis and verification

New materials are now proposed by learning models and made by robots. Evidence is strongest where independent synthesis exists, and weakest where claims rest on company posts or unreconciled results.

2.2million

predicted structures below the convex hull5

736structures

independently realised5

41 of 58targets

autonomous laboratory, 17 days6

Table 8.1State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Computational prediction2.2 million predicted structures; 736 independently realised510Reported
Generative designstructures more than twice as likely to be new and stable; one synthesised example within 20% of target711Reported
Autonomous synthesis41 of 58 targets reported realised in 17 days6Reported
Independent critiquescant evidence of novel, credible and useful compounds; about two thirds likely known disordered phases89Reported

Couplings

  • INF ↔ DAT shared databases
  • AIC → INF learning models
  • MIN → INF inputs

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • independent synthesis on a common basis
  • reconciliation of the critique and the original

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • XT-10 Cybersecurity and Advanced Cryptography
  • XT-02 Quantum Technologies
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • XT-01 Artificial Intelligence and Agentic Systems

8.2Production footprint, safety and applications

Engineered nanomaterials are in medicines, devices and water technology. Hazard assessment covers a few classes, and the energy and water use of production is not bound on a common basis.

2017volume

IARC assessed carbon nanotubes20

2.8litres per kg per day

MOF water harvesting at 20% humidity12

2023prize

mRNA vaccines needed carrier lipid systems3

Table 8.2State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Carbon nanotubesIARC Monographs Volume 111 assessed single-walled and multiwalled types for the first time2039Reported
Medical carriersthe 2023 medicine prize cites carrier lipid systems for mRNA delivery340Reported
Water harvestinga MOF device reached 2.8 litres per kg per day; a comment disputes its efficiency1213Reported
Production energy and waternot published on a common basis in the sources read19Expert input

Couplings

  • INF → HLT hazard before evidence
  • INF → WAT water harvesting
  • INF → ENE production energy

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • hazard evidence by material class
  • energy and water use of production

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • XT-10 Cybersecurity and Advanced Cryptography
  • XT-02 Quantum Technologies
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • XT-01 Artificial Intelligence and Agentic Systems

8.3Critical minerals, components and supply chain

Advanced materials depend on graphite, gallium, rare earths and other inputs whose production and processing are concentrated and whose trade measures changed in 2025.

82%

China share of natural graphite production17

99%

China share of primary low-purity gallium17

69%

China share of rare earth mine production, derived17

Table 8.3State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Natural graphiteno US production; net import reliance 100%; duties on anode material17Reported
Galliumimport unit value USD 580 per kg in 2025, about 30% above 2024; ban to the US lifted for one year17Reported
Rare earthscontrols tightened in April and widened in October 2025; October measures suspended for one year17Reported
Processing capacityby country not bound; secondary summaries differ24Expert input

Couplings

  • MIN → INF inputs
  • TRD → MIN export controls
  • GOV → MIN benchmarks

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • processing capacity by country
  • stocks and recycling volumes

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • XT-10 Cybersecurity and Advanced Cryptography
  • XT-02 Quantum Technologies
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • XT-01 Artificial Intelligence and Agentic Systems

8.4Economy, investment and workforce

Investment and workforce are the thin parts of the evidence. What exists is public programmes and field milestones, not totals.

2010prize

graphene4

2023prize

quantum dots2

2025prize

metal-organic frameworks1

Table 8.4State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Public programmesthe NNI coordinates over thirty federal departments and agencies; the MGI aims at discovery twice as fast2122Reported
Field milestonesNobel Prizes for graphene, quantum dots and metal-organic frameworks124Reported
Programme totalsnot bound; the programme pages carry no totals3334Expert input
Workforceno figure bound22Expert input

Couplings

  • FIN → INF scale-up
  • HLT → INF workforce
  • GOV → FIN programme funding

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • public funding totals
  • private investment
  • workforce size and skills gaps

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • XT-10 Cybersecurity and Advanced Cryptography
  • XT-02 Quantum Technologies
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • XT-01 Artificial Intelligence and Agentic Systems

8.5Safety, regulation and governance watch

The nearest effect of nanotechnology on other systems is regulatory: definitions, registration, reporting and design frameworks. Hazard evidence and definitions differ by jurisdiction.

40%

EU 2030 processing benchmark18

2022framework

safe and sustainable by design adopted19

2017volume

IARC nanotube assessment20

Table 8.5State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Raw materials lawEU Critical Raw Materials Act benchmarks for 20301841Reported
Design frameworkvoluntary; adopted 8 December 2022 and revised March 202619Reported
DefinitionEU recommendation of 2022 uses a 50% number-based test, from secondary summaries2531Reported
Registration and reportingnanoform registration under REACH; nanoscale reporting under TSCA2627Reported

Couplings

  • INF → HLT hazard before evidence
  • GOV → MIN benchmarks
  • GOV → TRD trade measures

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • text of national rules
  • hazard coverage by class

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • XT-10 Cybersecurity and Advanced Cryptography
  • XT-02 Quantum Technologies
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • XT-01 Artificial Intelligence and Agentic Systems

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 5Merchant, A., Batzner, S., Schoenholz, S.S., Aykol, M., Cheon, G. and Cubuk, E.D., Scaling deep learning for materials discovery, Nature 624, 80 to 85, 2023 (abstract record read: 48,000 known stable crystals; 2.2 million structures below the convex hull; 736 independently realised; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 6Szymanski, N.J. et al., An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials, Nature 624, 86 to 91, 2023 (abstract record read: 41 compounds from 58 targets in 17 days; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 10Google DeepMind (ed.), Millions of new materials discovered with deep learning (company blog post, 29 November 2023; states 2.2 million new crystals, 380,000 stable, 736 independently created). Google DeepMind, London. Vendor announcement, weak evidence. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 7Zeni, C. et al., A generative model for inorganic materials design, Nature, 2025, pages 624 to 632 (abstract record read: more than twice as likely to be new and stable; one structure synthesised within 20% of target; first published 16 January 2025). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 11Microsoft Research (ed.), MatterGen: a new paradigm of materials design with generative AI (company blog post; states a training set of 608,000 stable materials). Microsoft, Redmond. Vendor announcement, weak evidence. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 8Cheetham, A.K. and Seshadri, R., Artificial intelligence driving materials discovery? Perspective on the article Scaling Deep Learning for Materials Discovery, Chemistry of Materials, 2024, pages 3490 to 3495 (abstract record read: scant evidence for compounds that fulfil novelty, credibility and utility). American Chemical Society, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 9Leeman, J., Liu, Y., Stiles, J., Lee, S.B., Bhatt, P., Schoop, L.M. and Palgrave, R.G., Challenges in high-throughput inorganic materials prediction and autonomous synthesis, PRX Energy 3, 011002, 2024 (abstract read on a public repository page: 43 products examined; about two thirds of claimed successes likely known disordered phases). American Physical Society, College Park. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 20International Agency for Research on Cancer (ed.), Some Nanomaterials and Some Fibres, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 111, 2017 (publication page: first assessment of single-walled and multiwalled carbon nanotubes; classifications were not read). IARC, Lyon. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 12Kim, H. et al., Water harvesting from air with metal-organic frameworks powered by natural sunlight, Science 356, 430 to 434, 2017 (abstract record read: 2.8 litres of water per kilogram of MOF per day at relative humidity as low as 20%). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 3Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet (ed.), Press release: The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2023, awarded to Karikó and Weissman for nucleoside base modifications that enabled mRNA vaccines (2 October 2023; the text notes that delivery required carrier lipid systems). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Poland, C.A. et al., Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study, Nature Nanotechnology 3, 423 to 428, 2008, cited from memory. Observation year 2008. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: Hou, X., Zaks, T., Langer, R. and Dong, Y., Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery, Nature Reviews Materials 6, 1078 to 1094, 2021, cited from memory. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 13Bui, D.T., Chua, K.J. and Gordon, J.M., Comment on Water harvesting from air with metal-organic frameworks powered by natural sunlight, Science, 2017, eaao0791 (abstract record read; the authors of the original paper published a response, eaao3139, that rejects the comparison). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 19European Commission (eds.), Safe and sustainable by design (policy page, revised March 2026) and news article of 8 December 2022 on the Recommendation. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 17US Geological Survey (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (full report downloaded and read for natural graphite, gallium, rare earths and the foreign trade section; doi 10.3133/mcs2026). USGS, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. doi:10.3133/mcs2026back
  16. 24UNVERIFIED, not opened: IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (refining concentration and export controls), taken from search-result summaries that differ on the top-country shares; the report page returned an access error and no figure from it is used. International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 4Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (ed.), Press release: The Nobel Prize in Physics 2010, awarded to Geim and Novoselov for experiments on the two-dimensional material graphene (5 October 2010). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2010. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 2Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (ed.), Press release: The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2023, awarded to Bawendi, Brus and Yekimov for the discovery and synthesis of quantum dots (4 October 2023). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 1Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (ed.), Press release: Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2025, awarded to Kitagawa, Robson and Yaghi for the development of metal-organic frameworks (8 October 2025; uses named: harvesting water from desert air, capturing carbon dioxide, separating PFAS from water). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 21National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (ed.), About the National Nanotechnology Initiative (programme page: over thirty federal departments, independent agencies and commissions). NNCO, Alexandria. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 22Materials Genome Initiative (ed.), MGI home page (programme page: a federal multi-agency initiative for discovering, manufacturing and deploying advanced materials twice as fast and at a fraction of the cost). US Government, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: Graphene Flagship (ed.), programme about page; the page returned no readable text and no figure is used. Graphene Flagship, Gothenburg. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 34UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Department of Energy (ed.), Critical Materials Assessment, 2023, cited from memory; the page address tried was not found. DOE, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  24. 18European Commission (ed.), Critical Raw Materials Act (policy page: 2030 benchmarks of 10% extraction, 40% processing, 25% recycling and no more than 65% from a single third country). Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Brussels. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  25. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Parliament and Council (eds.), Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials, 2024; the legal text was not retrieved, the policy page was read instead [18]. European Union, Brussels. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  26. 25UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Commission (ed.), Commission Recommendation of 10 June 2022 on the definition of nanomaterial, 2022/C 229/01 (50% number-based test; replaces the 2011 text), taken from search-result summaries. European Commission, Brussels. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  27. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: Joint Research Centre (ed.), Guidance on the implementation of the Commission Recommendation on the definition of nanomaterial, EUR 31452 EN, 2023, taken from search-result summaries. European Commission, Ispra. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  28. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Commission (ed.), Regulation (EU) 2018/1881 amending the REACH annexes for nanoforms, applying from 2020, cited from memory. European Union, Brussels. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  29. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Environmental Protection Agency (ed.), Chemical substances when manufactured or processed as nanoscale materials, TSCA reporting and recordkeeping requirements, final rule, January 2017, cited from memory; the page returned an automated-access block. EPA, Washington. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Methodology

How the edition was made: methods, the model card, the evidence cut and its age, the acceptance record and the glossary.

12 min read0 figures13 tables14 notesNR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

A.1Methods

The global baseline uses published values and four simple derivations. Each is shown in full so that any reader can reproduce it.

Table A.1Methods
No.DerivationCalculationResult
(1)Share of targets reported realised by the autonomous laboratory41 ÷ 58about 71%
(2)Share of 380,000 stable predictions independently realised736 ÷ 380,000about 0.2%
(3)China share of rare earth mine production, 2025 estimate270,000 ÷ 390,000about 69%
(4)Change in US gallium metal imports, 2024 to 202525,000 ÷ 11,000about 2.3 times
Table A.2Coupling strength scale (matrix and model card)
StrengthDefinition
STRONGa disruption in the source system has historically changed the target system’s service or output within one season, in more than one region
MODERATEan effect is documented but buffered or slower
WEAKan effect is plausible but not documented at global scale
Table A.3Status grammar
LabelRule
Reportedvalue as issued by its source, with year
Inferredreasoned from cited evidence; never a measurement
EstimatedNexus analytical value with stated method
Scenarioconditional on stated assumptions
Expert inputstructured editorial judgement awaiting evidence

A.2Model card, Materials System Model v0

Model ID
MDL-XT12-MATERIALS · v0.1
Purpose
represent advanced materials and nanotechnology as a discovery system coupled to critical mineral supply, trade, safety evidence, energy, finance and workforce
Family
graph-based system of systems
Inputs
the cited sources of this edition; no proprietary data
Method
expert-specified coupling strengths (STRONG · MODERATE · WEAK) from assessments and analogue events
Validation
none yet, first validation against federation evidence in 2027
Uncertainty
qualitative; strengths are hypotheses, not measurements
Domain of validity
global scale; not for asset-, site- or country-level use
Reproducibility
strength table and sources published in this edition
20couplings

typed in v0

0strong

documented within one season

0moderate

documented, buffered

20weak

plausible, undocumented

A.3The baseline evidence cut

Every Nexus edition is published from a frozen evidence cut. The global baseline cut is documentary: it pins the exact edition of every source cited. Federation cuts begin with the first national Foundry cuts in 2027.

Cut ID
DC-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Type
baseline documentary cut
Resolution policy
pinned · as of 30 September 2026
Sources pinned
42 cited sources, each at the edition and access date in the references
Model runs
none at baseline, analytical values are stated with their method
Digest
computed at freeze and recorded in the publication record
Supersedes
nothing, first cut of the series
Superseded by
the 2027 materials annual cut

Lineage

  1. 01

    source edition

  2. 02

    pinned citation

  3. 03

    finding

  4. 04

    page

  5. 05

    publication record

Table A.4From the baseline cut to the federation cut
ElementBaseline 20262027 global annual
Sourcescited global publications, pinned by editionnational, regional and sector cuts through one graph
Analysisstated methods and editorial estimatestyped analysis specifications
ModelsMaterials System Model v0 specificationmodel runs with receipts
Findingstwelve baseline findingsfindings re-bound to federation evidence
Reviewfive passes scheduledfive passes on the exact digest

A.4Evidence age and coverage

A 2026 global edition rests on evidence observed in many different years. This page shows each time base, so that no single year label hides older evidence.

Table A.5Evidence age and coverage
IndicatorObservedReleasedCadenceNext release
Predicted structures2023Nov 2023one-offindependent synthesis reports
Autonomous laboratory2023Nov 2023one-offreplication
Critiques of discovery claims2024Mar and Apr 2024one-offauthor responses
Generative model2025Jan 2025one-offfurther validation
Mineral commodity summaries20252025 data, 2026 editionannual2027 edition
EU raw materials law20242024periodic2030 benchmarks
Design framework2022 · 2026Dec 2022 · Mar 2026periodictesting feedback
Carbon nanotube assessment20172017periodicnew evaluation
Superconductivity retractions2022 to 2023Sep 2022 · 2023per eventnew claims
Water harvesting2017Apr to Dec 2017one-offfield data
Table A.6Coverage by system at baseline
SystemCoverageThinnest dimension
DiscoveryPARTIALindependent synthesis on a common basis
SupplyGOODprocessing capacity by country
GovernancePARTIALtext of national rules
SafetyTHINhazard evidence by material class
FootprintTHINenergy and water use of production
InvestmentTHINprivate and public totals
SkillsTHINworkforce numbers
ApplicationsTHINdeployment and market data
Table A.7Designed empty states: what is not bound, what would fill it and why
FieldSource that would fill itBlocker
Independent synthesis of predicted materials on a common basispeer-reviewed replication papers and data releasesonly the count of 736 reported at publication was read5
Share of autonomous laboratory results that are new compoundsauthor responses and independent re-analysiscritique and original disagree; no reconciliation found69
Processing and refining capacity of critical minerals by countryIEA outlook, industry and trade statisticsthe IEA outlook could not be opened; secondary summaries give figures that differ24
Hazard and exposure evidence by nanomaterial classIARC, OECD programme, national agenciesonly the Volume 111 summary page was read; its classifications were not opened2028
Energy and water use of advanced materials productionlife cycle studies, producersno common-basis study retrieved
Text of the EU nanomaterial definition and the REACH nanoform rulesOfficial Journal textsofficial texts not opened; secondary summaries only2526
Best confirmed solar cell efficiencies for perovskite devicesnational laboratory efficiency charthost not reachable from the session32
Critical materials assessment of the US Department of Energydepartment assessmentpage not found at the address tried34
Public funding totals for materials and nanotechnology programmesbudget supplements, ministries, OECDnot retrieved; programme pages carry no totals212233
Private investment in advanced materialsmarket monitors, company reportsnot retrieved; no figure used
Workforce size and skills gapsnational statistics, surveysnot retrieved; capability rung stays LISTED
Deployment and market data for nanomaterial applicationsagencies, industry bodiesnot retrieved; no figure used
Capability rungs beyond standards and planningagencies, operators, laboratoriesnot reviewed

A.5Evidence cards, two anchor sources

Published in Nature 624 (2023) by a company research group. One-off study. Role: binds INF-001. Coverage: inorganic crystals; the abstract record was read, the full text was not.

EVD-XT12-001

Scaling deep learning for materials discovery5

Issued by the US Geological Survey for 2025 data. Annual. Role: binds MIN-005, MIN-006 and the supply tiles. Coverage: more than 90 minerals and materials, with a US focus.

EVD-XT12-002

Mineral Commodity Summaries 202617

Table A.8Quality dimensions at baseline
DimensionEVD-XT12-001EVD-XT12-002
Completenessinorganic crystals; one methodmore than 90 minerals; US perspective
Timelinessone-off; 2023annual; 2025 data in the 2026 edition
Revisioncritique published in 2024new edition each year
Method transparencymethods published; data release statedsurvey and trade data compiled by a survey
External validationpeer review and open critiqueagency review

Evidence cards to follow in 2027

  • Merchant et al.5: independent syntheses since publication
  • Szymanski et al.6: author response to the critique
  • USGS17: processing capacity by country
  • IARC20: classification text for each nanotube type

A.6Publication acceptance record

Editorial self-check at evidence close. Every applicable item carries a disposition; the remaining items are review, approval and deposit.

Table A.9Publication acceptance record
GroupAreaItemsPassN/APending
D1Identity and scope8800
D2Source and data12912
D3Analysis and models12381
D4Findings and claims9801
D5Figures, tables, maps10622
D6Editorial and citations10802
D7Review and approval130013
D8Artefact and design12705
D9Registry and release9009

Publication gate

Conditions met
14 of 23 at evidence close
Blocking problems
none recorded
Open conditions
reviews, approval of the exact digest, deposit, registry pointer

Not applicable at baseline

Model runs
first runs in Q1 2027
Maps
plates in Q2 2027
Waivers
none

A.7Status words

Table A.10The status every value carries
StatusWhat it means
ObservedMeasured directly and published by the source.
ReportedPublished statistics of an official or institutional source.
DeclaredStated by the body concerned; not independently measured.
EstimatedA Nexus estimate from cited evidence, with its method in Annex A.
ModelledProduced by a stated model from cited inputs.
InferredReasoned from cited evidence; not measured.
ForecastA projection by the cited source.
SimulatedA simulation result under stated assumptions.
ScenarioA conditional statement under stated assumptions; never a prediction.
Expert inputExpert judgement, recorded with its basis.
CandidateProposed for a later edition; not yet evidence.
Evidence-quality levels (EQL 1 to 5) grade the source behind a value; they are not a score of the subject.

A.8How the edition is made, released and corrected

Every edition is built from a sealed evidence cut, reviewed under three keys, signed and deposited before any site shows it as published; corrections go to Nexus Standards as change proposals and feed the next cut.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Evidence arrives from the pillarsFoundry seals observations and indicator series, Universe hands over after-action and scenario findings, and contributions are screened at every gateway, including this site’s.
02 The cut is sealedOn the cut date the evidence is pinned under one identifier, so anyone can rebuild the edition from exactly what it was built on.
03 The edition is assembledThe edition is drafted from its template and content pack. Agents may draft; they never publish and never decide.
04 The keys turnAt the publisher of record the truth key comes first: every value is checked against its source or stated method before the meaning and capital keys turn. No edition moves on until every key has been turned by a named steward.
05 The gate opensA named approver releases one exact digest of the edition; any change after this point is a new version, never a silent edit.
06 Signed and depositedThe PDF, the web edition and the data bundle are signed together with a manifest and an RO-Crate description, and deposited on Zenodo with a concept and a version DOI.
07 Published on its desk’s siteOnly then does the edition show as published on its desk’s Reports site, and the Collection lists it as a part.
08 Corrections go to StandardsMethod and correction findings go to Nexus Standards as change proposals; citations, corrections and new contributions feed the next evidence cut.

A teaching model of the process, not a forecast and not a record of any run; dates and counts on this page come from the programme record. Sources: Reports governance at GCRI Canada (2026); Zenodo, repository of record for Reports deposits (2026).

Lifecycle, one state at a time: Draft, Computed, Evidence bound, Reviewed, Approved for release, Published, Corrected, Superseded. This edition is a draft.

A.9Glossary and abbreviations

Table A.11Series terms
TermMeaning
Baseline Editionthe inaugural annual edition that fixes the reference state for the series
WEFH+Bwater, energy, food, health and biodiversity, the national nexus core
Couplinga typed dependency through which one system transmits to another
Protection gapthe share of losses not covered by insurance
Capability ladderLISTED → EXISTS → ADEQUATE → TESTED → DEMONSTRATED
EQLevidence-quality level, 1–5
Evidence cuta frozen resolution of exact sources and versions
NNC · NLC · NWGNational Nexus Consortium · National Leadership Council · National Working Groups
Table A.12Abbreviations used in this edition
AbbreviationExpansion
CRMACritical Raw Materials Act
GNoMEGraph Networks for Materials Exploration
IARCInternational Agency for Research on Cancer
MGIMaterials Genome Initiative
MOFmetal-organic framework
NNINational Nanotechnology Initiative
nmnanometre
REACHRegistration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals
RHrelative humidity
SSbDsafe and sustainable by design
TSCAToxic Substances Control Act
USGSUS Geological Survey

A.10Technical annex

Table A.13Technical annex
ItemAnnexContentsStatus
A.1Indicator definitionsthe global indicator set, with units and sourcesIN THIS EDITION
A.2Coupling strengthsthe twenty-cell matrix and its rationaleIN THIS EDITION
A.3Scenario specificationSCN-XT12-VER-01 assumptions and signpostsIN THIS EDITION
A.4Capability placementsrung evidence for fifteen functionsIN THIS EDITION
A.5Model diagnosticsfirst runs and validation2027
A.6Sensitivity analysesinfluence of coupling strengths2027
A.7Cluster notescards for the major materials processing and discovery clusters2027
A.8Review statementspass-by-pass review recordAT RELEASE

A.1 · indicator definition: net import reliance

Construct
share of apparent consumption of a commodity that is met by imports rather than by domestic production
Unit
percent of apparent consumption
Method
imports minus exports, adjusted for stock changes, divided by apparent consumption
Source
USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 202617
Uncertainty
trade data and stock estimates are revised in later editions
Known limits
a United States measure; says nothing about processing capacity in other countries

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 5Merchant, A., Batzner, S., Schoenholz, S.S., Aykol, M., Cheon, G. and Cubuk, E.D., Scaling deep learning for materials discovery, Nature 624, 80 to 85, 2023 (abstract record read: 48,000 known stable crystals; 2.2 million structures below the convex hull; 736 independently realised; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 6Szymanski, N.J. et al., An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials, Nature 624, 86 to 91, 2023 (abstract record read: 41 compounds from 58 targets in 17 days; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 9Leeman, J., Liu, Y., Stiles, J., Lee, S.B., Bhatt, P., Schoop, L.M. and Palgrave, R.G., Challenges in high-throughput inorganic materials prediction and autonomous synthesis, PRX Energy 3, 011002, 2024 (abstract read on a public repository page: 43 products examined; about two thirds of claimed successes likely known disordered phases). American Physical Society, College Park. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 24UNVERIFIED, not opened: IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (refining concentration and export controls), taken from search-result summaries that differ on the top-country shares; the report page returned an access error and no figure from it is used. International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 20International Agency for Research on Cancer (ed.), Some Nanomaterials and Some Fibres, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 111, 2017 (publication page: first assessment of single-walled and multiwalled carbon nanotubes; classifications were not read). IARC, Lyon. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: OECD (ed.), Working Party on Manufactured Nanomaterials programme and test guidelines, cited from memory; the page returned an automated-access block. OECD, Paris. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 25UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Commission (ed.), Commission Recommendation of 10 June 2022 on the definition of nanomaterial, 2022/C 229/01 (50% number-based test; replaces the 2011 text), taken from search-result summaries. European Commission, Brussels. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Commission (ed.), Regulation (EU) 2018/1881 amending the REACH annexes for nanoforms, applying from 2020, cited from memory. European Union, Brussels. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 32UNVERIFIED, not opened: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (ed.), Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart, cited from memory; the host was not reachable from the session and no figure is used. NREL, Golden. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 34UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Department of Energy (ed.), Critical Materials Assessment, 2023, cited from memory; the page address tried was not found. DOE, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 21National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (ed.), About the National Nanotechnology Initiative (programme page: over thirty federal departments, independent agencies and commissions). NNCO, Alexandria. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 22Materials Genome Initiative (ed.), MGI home page (programme page: a federal multi-agency initiative for discovering, manufacturing and deploying advanced materials twice as fast and at a fraction of the cost). US Government, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: Graphene Flagship (ed.), programme about page; the page returned no readable text and no figure is used. Graphene Flagship, Gothenburg. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 17US Geological Survey (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (full report downloaded and read for natural graphite, gallium, rare earths and the foreign trade section; doi 10.3133/mcs2026). USGS, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. doi:10.3133/mcs2026back

Data appendix

The indicator set with its sources, the source registers, the licences of every kind of material and the formats of the edition.

10 min read0 figures8 tables18 notesNR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

B.1The indicator set

Table B.1Global baseline indicator set
IndicatorValueUnitYearStateSource
Predicted structures below the convex hull2.2million2023Reported5
Known stable crystals before the study48,000crystals2023Reported5
Structures independently realised736structures2023Reported5
Stable predictions offered to the research community380,000materials2023Reported10
Targets set for the autonomous laboratory58compounds2023Reported6
Targets reported realised41compounds2023Reported6
Continuous operation17days2023Reported6
Training set of the generative model, company post608,000stable materials2025Reported11
Property of the one synthesised structure against target20% within2025Reported7
China share of natural graphite production82%2025Reported17
US net import reliance, natural graphite100%2025Reported17
China share of primary low-purity gallium99%2025Reported17
US gallium metal import unit value580USD per kg2025Reported17
World rare earth mine production390,000tonnes2025Reported17
EU 2030 benchmark, processing40%2030 planScenario18
EU 2030 benchmark, recycling25%2030 planScenario18
Water harvested by the framework device at 20% humidity2.8litres per kg per day2017Reported12

B.2Global source register

The governed source set behind this edition. Each source keeps its authority, coverage, cadence and role; categories describe origin, not truth.

Domains bound by the register

  • INF
  • MIN
  • TRD
  • DAT
  • HLT
  • ENE
  • WAT
  • FIN
  • CLI
  • FOO
Table B.3Global source register
SourceCategoryCoveragePeriodCadenceRole
Nature paper on predicted structures5peer-reviewed journalglobal2023one-offdiscovery
Nature paper on an autonomous laboratory6peer-reviewed journalone laboratory2023one-offsynthesis
Critiques89peer-reviewed journalsmethod2024one-offverification
Generative model paper7peer-reviewed journalmethod2025one-offdesign
USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries17national geological surveyglobal2025annualsupply
European Commission pages1819EU institutionEU2024 to 2026continuouspolicy
IARC Monographs Volume 11120intergovernmental agencyglobal2017periodichazard
Nobel Prize press releases1234prize committeesglobal2010 to 2025annualfield milestones
Company posts1011vendorsglobal2023 to 2025per eventvendor claims
National programme pages2122national programmesUS2026continuousprogrammes

B.3Regional reading, materials across ten clusters

Regional plates follow with the regional editions. This page gives the regional reading of materials supply and safety in table form and ranks no region.

Table B.4Regional reading, materials across ten clusters
RegionPrincipal hazardsSystems most exposedBaseline evidence
North Americaimport reliance for graphite and gallium; discovery laboratoriessupply, discoveryUSGS17; Nature56
South Americamineral producers; processing not boundsupplyregional evidence (not bound)
Europeraw materials law; design framework; hazard assessmentpolicy, safetyEuropean Commission1819; IARC20
Eurasiaprocessing and export controlssupplyregional evidence (not bound)
Middle East and North Africaprocessing projects announced; not boundsupplyregional evidence (not bound)
Africacobalt and manganese export measuressupply, tradeUSGS17
South Asianational programmes; not boundresearch, skillsregional evidence (not bound)
East Asiagraphite, gallium and rare earth production and processingsupply, tradeUSGS17
ASEANgraphite processing projects and rare earth sovereignty policysupplyUSGS17
Oceania-Pacificmineral producers; research programmessupply, researchregional evidence (not bound)

B.4Cluster card: graphite anode material supply chain

  • supply chain
  • graphite
  • anode material
  • single point
Systems in view
natural graphite mining, purification, spherical graphite and anode material
Defining events
US duties on Chinese anode material in 2025; Chinese export growth of spherical graphite17
Couplings
MIN → INF electrodes; TRD → MIN trade measures
Capability evidence
new spherical graphite plants reported outside China17
Gaps
processing capacity by country; stocks; recycling volumes
Agenda items
M-02 · M-05

China produced an estimated 82% of world natural graphite in 2025, and the United States produced none [17].

SUPPLY

Graphite concentration

The US Department of Commerce set preliminary antidumping duties of 93.50% on Chinese graphite active anode material in 2025 [17].

TRADE

Anode material duties

Spherical graphite plants were reported in Indonesia and under study in several other countries; none is documented at scale here [17].

RESPONSE

New plants

B.5How countries appear in the materials edition

Countries enter the materials edition through the readiness chapters of their own national editions, on one card grammar. They are read against peer distributions and thresholds, never ranked.

Table B.5How countries appear in the materials edition
Card fieldWhat it showsSource
WEFH+B stateeach core system against peer distribution bandsnational edition
Couplingsthe national dependency matrixnational edition
Risk objectsthe national risk portfolionational edition
Capability rungsthe national capability laddernational edition
Evidence ageoldest and newest source datesnational source register

Editions in the 2026 Baseline programme

26national

countries and unions

10regional

clusters

16global

flagship and sector

14strategic

systems reports

20frontier

technology reports

How to read a country card

  • Each system is shown against the distribution of its peers, with thresholds where they exist
  • Couplings and risk objects come from the country’s own national edition
  • Capability rungs record evidence, not a judgement of institutions
  • Evidence age is printed, so older national data are visible as such
Table B.6National Baseline Editions in the 2026 programme
WaveCountries and unionsState
W0CanadaISSUED
W1United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, European Union, SwitzerlandPLANNED
W2Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Türkiye, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, Senegal, Kenya, African Union, India, China, Republic of Korea, Indonesia, Singapore, AustraliaPLANNED

B.6Licences

Table B.7Licences of each kind of material
MaterialLicence
TextCC BY 4.0
Dataon the licence of each source; Nexus tables CC BY 4.0
FiguresNexus figures CC BY 4.0; third-party as credited
Mapsboundary source and licence printed on each plate
MetadataCC0 1.0, as Zenodo publishes it
Third-party data, figures and textThe source’s own licence, credited where it is used; never relicensed
Nexus-authored text, tables and figures: CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0). Map plates print their boundary source and licence.

B.7Formats and provenance

Table B.8This edition in every format
FormatKindStateWhat it isIdentifier
Web editionHTMLOn this siteDraft in stewardship review; every value resolves to its source.NR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Print editionPDFAt releaseA4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF, signed with the web edition at release.NR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Indicator dataCSV · JSONOn this site17 indicators with unit, year, status and source; the machine-readable copy ships with the evidence bundle at release.NR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE data release v1
FiguresSVG · PNGOn this site4 on the web edition: headline figure, figure 1.3, coupling instrument, capability ladder.FIG-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-*
SlidesPDFNot recordedNo slide deck is recorded for this edition.
Evidence briefHTML · PDFNot recordedNo evidence brief is recorded for this edition.
Dataset with DOIDataCiteAt releaseConcept and version DOI are minted at deposit; none is recorded yet.

Provenance

Edition pack
The edition’s content pack (JSON), from which the print and web editions are built
Evidence cut
DC-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-B0, closed 30 September 2026
Reproducibility
sourced values cited; analytical values reproducible from stated parameters
Self-check
14 of 23 at evidence close; a fail on any item blocks release
Review
five passes scheduled before release (in Annex C)
Publisher of record
GCRI for the Nexus Consortium
Corrections
Registry correction pathway; upheld corrections are published as notices with a new version

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 5Merchant, A., Batzner, S., Schoenholz, S.S., Aykol, M., Cheon, G. and Cubuk, E.D., Scaling deep learning for materials discovery, Nature 624, 80 to 85, 2023 (abstract record read: 48,000 known stable crystals; 2.2 million structures below the convex hull; 736 independently realised; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 10Google DeepMind (ed.), Millions of new materials discovered with deep learning (company blog post, 29 November 2023; states 2.2 million new crystals, 380,000 stable, 736 independently created). Google DeepMind, London. Vendor announcement, weak evidence. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 6Szymanski, N.J. et al., An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials, Nature 624, 86 to 91, 2023 (abstract record read: 41 compounds from 58 targets in 17 days; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 11Microsoft Research (ed.), MatterGen: a new paradigm of materials design with generative AI (company blog post; states a training set of 608,000 stable materials). Microsoft, Redmond. Vendor announcement, weak evidence. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 7Zeni, C. et al., A generative model for inorganic materials design, Nature, 2025, pages 624 to 632 (abstract record read: more than twice as likely to be new and stable; one structure synthesised within 20% of target; first published 16 January 2025). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 17US Geological Survey (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (full report downloaded and read for natural graphite, gallium, rare earths and the foreign trade section; doi 10.3133/mcs2026). USGS, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. doi:10.3133/mcs2026back
  7. 18European Commission (ed.), Critical Raw Materials Act (policy page: 2030 benchmarks of 10% extraction, 40% processing, 25% recycling and no more than 65% from a single third country). Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Brussels. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 12Kim, H. et al., Water harvesting from air with metal-organic frameworks powered by natural sunlight, Science 356, 430 to 434, 2017 (abstract record read: 2.8 litres of water per kilogram of MOF per day at relative humidity as low as 20%). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 8Cheetham, A.K. and Seshadri, R., Artificial intelligence driving materials discovery? Perspective on the article Scaling Deep Learning for Materials Discovery, Chemistry of Materials, 2024, pages 3490 to 3495 (abstract record read: scant evidence for compounds that fulfil novelty, credibility and utility). American Chemical Society, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 9Leeman, J., Liu, Y., Stiles, J., Lee, S.B., Bhatt, P., Schoop, L.M. and Palgrave, R.G., Challenges in high-throughput inorganic materials prediction and autonomous synthesis, PRX Energy 3, 011002, 2024 (abstract read on a public repository page: 43 products examined; about two thirds of claimed successes likely known disordered phases). American Physical Society, College Park. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 19European Commission (eds.), Safe and sustainable by design (policy page, revised March 2026) and news article of 8 December 2022 on the Recommendation. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 20International Agency for Research on Cancer (ed.), Some Nanomaterials and Some Fibres, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 111, 2017 (publication page: first assessment of single-walled and multiwalled carbon nanotubes; classifications were not read). IARC, Lyon. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 1Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (ed.), Press release: Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2025, awarded to Kitagawa, Robson and Yaghi for the development of metal-organic frameworks (8 October 2025; uses named: harvesting water from desert air, capturing carbon dioxide, separating PFAS from water). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 2Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (ed.), Press release: The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2023, awarded to Bawendi, Brus and Yekimov for the discovery and synthesis of quantum dots (4 October 2023). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 3Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet (ed.), Press release: The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2023, awarded to Karikó and Weissman for nucleoside base modifications that enabled mRNA vaccines (2 October 2023; the text notes that delivery required carrier lipid systems). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 4Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (ed.), Press release: The Nobel Prize in Physics 2010, awarded to Geim and Novoselov for experiments on the two-dimensional material graphene (5 October 2010). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2010. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 21National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (ed.), About the National Nanotechnology Initiative (programme page: over thirty federal departments, independent agencies and commissions). NNCO, Alexandria. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 22Materials Genome Initiative (ed.), MGI home page (programme page: a federal multi-agency initiative for discovering, manufacturing and deploying advanced materials twice as fast and at a fraction of the cost). US Government, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

References and record

Every source the edition rests on, the publication record, the corrections log and the open record.

14 min read0 figures1 table0 notesNR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

C.142 sources

NR-CIT-1, editor first. A DOI is linked where the source has one; Nexus records carry a UNI once the catalogue allocates it (NS-1).

  1. 1Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (ed.), Press release: Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2025, awarded to Kitagawa, Robson and Yaghi for the development of metal-organic frameworks (8 October 2025; uses named: harvesting water from desert air, capturing carbon dioxide, separating PFAS from water). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  2. 2Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (ed.), Press release: The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2023, awarded to Bawendi, Brus and Yekimov for the discovery and synthesis of quantum dots (4 October 2023). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6, chapter 8
  3. 3Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet (ed.), Press release: The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2023, awarded to Karikó and Weissman for nucleoside base modifications that enabled mRNA vaccines (2 October 2023; the text notes that delivery required carrier lipid systems). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  4. 4Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (ed.), Press release: The Nobel Prize in Physics 2010, awarded to Geim and Novoselov for experiments on the two-dimensional material graphene (5 October 2010). NobelPrize.org, Stockholm. Observation year 2010. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6, chapter 8
  5. 5Merchant, A., Batzner, S., Schoenholz, S.S., Aykol, M., Cheon, G. and Cubuk, E.D., Scaling deep learning for materials discovery, Nature 624, 80 to 85, 2023 (abstract record read: 48,000 known stable crystals; 2.2 million structures below the convex hull; 736 independently realised; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  6. 6Szymanski, N.J. et al., An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials, Nature 624, 86 to 91, 2023 (abstract record read: 41 compounds from 58 targets in 17 days; the full text was not read). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  7. 7Zeni, C. et al., A generative model for inorganic materials design, Nature, 2025, pages 624 to 632 (abstract record read: more than twice as likely to be new and stable; one structure synthesised within 20% of target; first published 16 January 2025). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  8. 8Cheetham, A.K. and Seshadri, R., Artificial intelligence driving materials discovery? Perspective on the article Scaling Deep Learning for Materials Discovery, Chemistry of Materials, 2024, pages 3490 to 3495 (abstract record read: scant evidence for compounds that fulfil novelty, credibility and utility). American Chemical Society, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  9. 9Leeman, J., Liu, Y., Stiles, J., Lee, S.B., Bhatt, P., Schoop, L.M. and Palgrave, R.G., Challenges in high-throughput inorganic materials prediction and autonomous synthesis, PRX Energy 3, 011002, 2024 (abstract read on a public repository page: 43 products examined; about two thirds of claimed successes likely known disordered phases). American Physical Society, College Park. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 5, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  10. 10Google DeepMind (ed.), Millions of new materials discovered with deep learning (company blog post, 29 November 2023; states 2.2 million new crystals, 380,000 stable, 736 independently created). Google DeepMind, London. Vendor announcement, weak evidence. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  11. 11Microsoft Research (ed.), MatterGen: a new paradigm of materials design with generative AI (company blog post; states a training set of 608,000 stable materials). Microsoft, Redmond. Vendor announcement, weak evidence. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  12. 12Kim, H. et al., Water harvesting from air with metal-organic frameworks powered by natural sunlight, Science 356, 430 to 434, 2017 (abstract record read: 2.8 litres of water per kilogram of MOF per day at relative humidity as low as 20%). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  13. 13Bui, D.T., Chua, K.J. and Gordon, J.M., Comment on Water harvesting from air with metal-organic frameworks powered by natural sunlight, Science, 2017, eaao0791 (abstract record read; the authors of the original paper published a response, eaao3139, that rejects the comparison). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  14. 14Nature (ed.), LK-99 isn’t a superconductor: how science sleuths solved the mystery, Nature 620, 705, 2023 (news article; the page was opened but only its headline and summary were readable behind the access wall). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 5
  15. 15Nature (ed.), Retraction Note: Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride (published 26 September 2022; the original paper appeared on 14 October 2020; all authors disagreed with the decision). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 5, chapter 7
  16. 16Nature (ed.), Retraction Note: Evidence of near-ambient superconductivity in a N-doped lutetium hydride, Nature, 2023 (publication record read; the note text was not available in the record). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 5, chapter 7
  17. 17US Geological Survey (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (full report downloaded and read for natural graphite, gallium, rare earths and the foreign trade section; doi 10.3133/mcs2026). USGS, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. doi:10.3133/mcs2026 Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  18. 18European Commission (ed.), Critical Raw Materials Act (policy page: 2030 benchmarks of 10% extraction, 40% processing, 25% recycling and no more than 65% from a single third country). Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Brussels. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  19. 19European Commission (eds.), Safe and sustainable by design (policy page, revised March 2026) and news article of 8 December 2022 on the Recommendation. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  20. 20International Agency for Research on Cancer (ed.), Some Nanomaterials and Some Fibres, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 111, 2017 (publication page: first assessment of single-walled and multiwalled carbon nanotubes; classifications were not read). IARC, Lyon. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  21. 21National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (ed.), About the National Nanotechnology Initiative (programme page: over thirty federal departments, independent agencies and commissions). NNCO, Alexandria. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  22. 22Materials Genome Initiative (ed.), MGI home page (programme page: a federal multi-agency initiative for discovering, manufacturing and deploying advanced materials twice as fast and at a fraction of the cost). US Government, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  23. 23Zhang, B. et al., A cross-linked molecular contact for stable operation of perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells, Science, 2025, pages 837 to 842 (abstract record read: resistance of conventional monomeric contacts rises about sixfold at elevated temperature). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 6
  24. 24UNVERIFIED, not opened: IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (refining concentration and export controls), taken from search-result summaries that differ on the top-country shares; the report page returned an access error and no figure from it is used. International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  25. 25UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Commission (ed.), Commission Recommendation of 10 June 2022 on the definition of nanomaterial, 2022/C 229/01 (50% number-based test; replaces the 2011 text), taken from search-result summaries. European Commission, Brussels. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  26. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Commission (ed.), Regulation (EU) 2018/1881 amending the REACH annexes for nanoforms, applying from 2020, cited from memory. European Union, Brussels. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  27. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Environmental Protection Agency (ed.), Chemical substances when manufactured or processed as nanoscale materials, TSCA reporting and recordkeeping requirements, final rule, January 2017, cited from memory; the page returned an automated-access block. EPA, Washington. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  28. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: OECD (ed.), Working Party on Manufactured Nanomaterials programme and test guidelines, cited from memory; the page returned an automated-access block. OECD, Paris. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  29. 29UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO (ed.), ISO/TS 80004-1, Nanotechnologies: vocabulary, part 1, core terms, cited from memory. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. Observation year 2015. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  30. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO (ed.), ISO/TC 229 Nanotechnologies, technical committee, cited from memory; the page returned an automated-access block. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  31. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: Joint Research Centre (ed.), Guidance on the implementation of the Commission Recommendation on the definition of nanomaterial, EUR 31452 EN, 2023, taken from search-result summaries. European Commission, Ispra. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  32. 32UNVERIFIED, not opened: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (ed.), Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart, cited from memory; the host was not reachable from the session and no figure is used. NREL, Golden. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.
  33. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: Graphene Flagship (ed.), programme about page; the page returned no readable text and no figure is used. Graphene Flagship, Gothenburg. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 8
  34. 34UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Department of Energy (ed.), Critical Materials Assessment, 2023, cited from memory; the page address tried was not found. DOE, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 8
  35. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: Novoselov, K.S. et al., Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films, Science 306, 666 to 669, 2004, cited from memory. Observation year 2004. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  36. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: Li, H., Eddaoudi, M., O’Keeffe, M. and Yaghi, O.M., Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework, Nature 402, 276 to 279, 1999, cited from memory. Observation year 1999. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  37. 37UNVERIFIED, not opened: Iijima, S., Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon, Nature 354, 56 to 58, 1991, cited from memory. Observation year 1991. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  38. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: Jain, A. et al., Commentary: The Materials Project, a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1, 011002, 2013, cited from memory. Observation year 2013. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  39. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Poland, C.A. et al., Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study, Nature Nanotechnology 3, 423 to 428, 2008, cited from memory. Observation year 2008. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  40. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: Hou, X., Zaks, T., Langer, R. and Dong, Y., Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery, Nature Reviews Materials 6, 1078 to 1094, 2021, cited from memory. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6, chapter 8
  41. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Parliament and Council (eds.), Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials, 2024; the legal text was not retrieved, the policy page was read instead [18]. European Union, Brussels. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  42. 42UNVERIFIED, not opened: Brus, L.E., Electron-electron and electron-hole interactions in small semiconductor crystallites: the size dependence of the lowest excited electronic state, Journal of Chemical Physics 80, 4403 to 4409, 1984, cited from memory. Observation year 1984. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6

C.2Publication record

Publication

Title
Exponential Technology Report 2026: Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Baseline Edition
Series
Reports · Exponential Technology Series XT-12
Edition
Baseline Edition 2026 · inaugural annual
Version
v1.0.0 · draft for stewardship review
Publication ID
NR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Evidence close
30 September 2026
Publication date
October 2026
DOI
concept and version DOI at deposit

Publisher

Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), for the Nexus Consortium
Place
Toronto
Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor
Stewards
GCRI · technical truth · GRF · public meaning · GRA · capital meaning
Licence
text CC BY 4.0; data on the terms of each source
Copyright
© 2026 GCRI · Nexus Consortium
Language
English (en-GB) source edition
Correspondence
Registry correction pathway · editorial office

Colophon

Format
A4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF
Typefaces
Space Grotesk (display) · Geist (text) · IBM Plex Sans Italic (standfirsts) · IBM Plex Mono (data)
Design standard
Reports Foundational Edition, Volume I, Part VII
Accessibility
tagged PDF and HTML targets; text alternatives for every figure
Production
Reports editorial team, GCRI

Release path for this version

Table C.1Release path for this version
StepWhat happensWhen
Drafteditorial self-check complete at evidence closeOctober 2026
Steward reviewfive passes on the exact draft (keys T · M · F · N)Q4 2026
Approvalpublication authority approves the exact digestbefore release
Depositconcept and version DOI minted; registry pointer setat release
Successionthe 2027 materials edition reports changes against this baseline2027
Current version
v1.0.0 draft, stewardship review
Previous edition
none, first edition of the series
Next edition
NR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2027-v1.0.0
Latest version
resolve the concept DOI or the registry record
Correction route
Registry correction pathway
Notice types
erratum · addendum · supersession · withdrawal

C.3Corrections log

0correction notices. No edition has been released yet, so none can be corrected; the log below lists each edition’s current version.

EditionVersionDateStateChangeNotice
XT-12NR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0October 2026DraftBaseline Edition 2026, inaugural annual edition,None

Notice types: erratum, addendum, supersession, withdrawal. A correction is a new version with a published notice; the earlier version stays resolvable, and no edition is ever edited in silence.

C.4Open record

This edition’s open record

Publication ID
NR-XTECH-MATERIALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Desk identifier and series alias
NR-XTC-XT-12-2026-BL
Collection
None
DOI
Concept and version DOI at deposit, on Zenodo with DataCite metadata
Versions
Each correction is a new version (isNewVersionOf); the concept DOI resolves to the latest
Bundle
RO-Crate 1.2 with CITATION.cff, CodeMeta and PROV-O provenance; a signed manifest
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0) for original material; metadata CC0 1.0

Credit and identity

ORCID
Your iD in the deposit and the contribution record; DataCite can then add the work to your ORCID record
ROR
Your organisation by its ROR identifier, never by a typed name alone
CRediT
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualisation, Writing, review and editing
Account
None needed to contribute; never a password

Find and follow

Search the open indexes for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology; software is cited by its SWHID from Software Heritage, and a quantified scenario run is preregistered on OSF before it is run. Annotation is your choice: Hypothesis opens this page in its own viewer.

Mirrors and harvest

The DOI is canonical. At release each signed bundle is also given an IPFS content identifier and a bloxberg anchor as mirrors; both are listed in the record once they exist. Zenodo exposes every record over OAI-PMH, and reviews and endorsements can arrive through COAR Notify where the repository supports it.

InvenioRDM metadata for a contribution on Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, prefilled from this page
{
  "metadata": {
    "resource_type": {
      "id": "dataset"
    },
    "title": "Evidence on Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology for Nexus Reports",
    "publication_date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
    "creators": [
      {
        "person_or_org": {
          "type": "personal",
          "family_name": "Your family name",
          "given_name": "Your given name",
          "identifiers": [
            {
              "scheme": "orcid",
              "identifier": "0000-0000-0000-0000"
            }
          ]
        },
        "affiliations": [
          {
            "id": "ROR identifier of your organisation"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "description": "What it is, where its record is kept and how it bears on Exponential Technology Report 2026: Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology.",
    "rights": [
      {
        "id": "cc-by-4.0"
      }
    ],
    "subjects": [
      {
        "subject": "Nexus Reports"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Exponential Technology Report · XT-12"
      }
    ],
    "related_identifiers": [
      {
        "identifier": "https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/editions/xt-12/",
        "scheme": "url",
        "relation_type": {
          "id": "issupplementto"
        },
        "resource_type": {
          "id": "publication-report"
        }
      }
    ],
    "version": "1.0.0"
  },
  "custom_fields": {},
  "access": {
    "record": "public",
    "files": "public"
  },
  "files": {
    "enabled": true
  },
  "parent": {
    "communities": {
      "default": "nexusreports"
    }
  }
}

C.5Where this edition sits among the six pillars

Foundry seals the evidence and Universe tests it; Reports publishes it; Standards takes its corrections and Academy teaches from it.

  1. F03 Sealed observations and indicator series Foundry Sealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
  2. F04 After-action and scenario findings for Universe After-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
  3. F05 National Portfolio movement for chapter Foundry National Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
  4. Applied in editions Standards Nexus Standards: applied in editions.
  5. XT-12 edition Reports Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology 2026, published in every format with its sources, citation and corrections.
  6. F06 Method and correction findings as change Standards Method and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
  7. F12 Q4 synthesis informs the next-year Universe Q4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
  8. Taught in the open Academy Risk Academy: taught in the open.

What Foundry and Universe hand to this edition, and what it hands to Standards, Universe and Academy. From the programme spine; XT-12 is a drafted Baseline Edition, so these handoffs run from its first operational quarter.

HandoffBetweenWhat crosses, and when
F03Foundry to ReportsSealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
F04Universe to ReportsAfter-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
F05Foundry to ReportsNational Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
RingNexus Standards to ReportsNexus Standards: applied in editions.
F06Reports to Nexus StandardsMethod and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
F12Reports to UniverseQ4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
RingReports to Risk AcademyRisk Academy: taught in the open.
ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the GCRI Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskExponential Technology

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.