불만 제기와 무결성 보고

• 1.1 A complaint about a Service, a page, a decision taken under the policies of the Site, the handling of personal information, accessibility or the conduct of a person acting for the publisher.
• 1.2 An integrity concern: fabrication, falsification or plagiarism in research; an undisclosed conflict of interest; undue influence of a sponsor, funder or provider on a finding; fraud, corruption or misuse of funds; a breach of 제재 or export-control law; harassment, discrimination or abuse; or retaliation against anyone who raised a concern.

• 2.1 보낼 곳 문의 양식, marking the message confidential if it concerns integrity. Describe what happened, when, who was involved as far as you know, and any evidence.
• 2.2 A concern may be raised without giving a name. An anonymous report is assessed in the same way, though the publisher cannot ask questions about it or report back without a means of contact.
• 2.3 Privacy complaints may also follow the route of the Privacy Policy of GCRI Canada.

• 3.1 Every complaint or report is acknowledged with a reference and assessed. A matter that needs investigation is investigated proportionately, fairly and promptly, by people who are independent of those concerned and who declare any conflict of interest.
• 3.2 People who are the subject of a report are told of it at an appropriate time and given the chance to respond. The person who raised the matter is told the outcome, within the limits of confidentiality and of the rights of others.
• 3.3 The outcome and the reasons are recorded. Where a finding is affected, a correction or retraction is published under the 정정 및 반론권 정책.

• 4.1 The identity of a person who raises a concern is kept confidential and shared only with those who need it to handle the matter, or where the law requires it.
• 4.2 No one is penalised or treated less favourably for raising a concern in good faith, even if it is not upheld. Retaliation is a serious breach of the 행동 강령.
• 4.3 Nothing in this procedure limits a person’s right to report a matter to a competent authority, or any protection the law gives to those who report wrongdoing.

• 5.1 A person who is not satisfied with the outcome may ask that it be reviewed by the governing body of GCRI Canada, by writing to the same address with the reference.
• 5.2 Concerns about personal information may be taken to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada where PIPEDA applies, and the provincial privacy authority where substantially similar provincial law applies (the Commission d’accès à l’information du Québec, and the Information and Privacy Commissioners of Alberta and British Columbia), and concerns about accessibility to the body that enforces accessibility law where you live. Nothing in this procedure prevents recourse to the courts.

• 6.1 This procedure is not an emergency service. A person in danger should contact the local emergency services or the competent public authority.

채택 전에 법률 자문의 검토를 거치도록 준비되어 있습니다.

• 이메일게이트웨이 GW-GCRI이 페이지에서 보내기증거, 정정, 사례, 방법, 검토, 번역 또는 프로필 입력 자료. 이 페이지의 태그가 붙어 도착하므로, 이를 담당하는 편집자가 받게 됩니다.
• Zenodo개방형 예치기탁하고 커뮤니티에 제출하기ORCID iD로 Zenodo에 직접 기록을 게시한 뒤, 그곳의 Reports 커뮤니티에 제출하십시오. 큐레이터가 검토하며, DOI는 귀하의 것으로 남습니다.
• 보고서GCRI어느 담당 부서가 귀하의 내용을 받는지 확인하기안내표를 열면 기여 페이지로 연결되며, 무엇을 가지고 있는지, 어느 담당 부서가 받는지, 각 기여를 어떻게 검토하고 표기하는지, 그리고 라이선스를 확인할 수 있습니다.

개인정보, 민감한 인프라 세부 정보, 공유할 권리가 없는 자료는 절대 보내지 마십시오. 기여물은 사용 전에 검토됩니다. 기여물을 보낸다고 해서 저작자 지위나 편집 권한이 부여되지 않으며, 후원으로 조사 결과를 얻을 수 없습니다.