The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI)
Teams in Digital Public Infrastructure adopted to deliver a defined piece of work, each with a workplan, a supervisor and a clear end. A working group has no public authority beyond its workplan.
Digital public infrastructure · Working groups
| Consent and rights WG | 27 | 5 | Week 38 | Active |
| Resilience WG | 16 | 6 | Week 21 | Chair needed |
| Interoperability WG | 13 | 11 | Week 27 | Chair needed |
| Inclusion WG | 36 | 11 | Week 26 | Active |
Digital Public Infrastructure · Community workspaceCommunity workspace, in outline: domain structure with placeholder names and illustrative values, not a record.
A working group of Digital Public Infrastructure is a team adopted to deliver one defined piece of work in the digital public infrastructure field, with terms of reference, a workplan, a supervisor and an end date. Candidate subjects come from the platform's topics, such as interoperability and apis. A working group holds no authority beyond its workplan, and its outputs are reviewed before publication.
Fig.The path from an enquiry to a credited contribution. Design, not a record; no step creates membership.
Population density, night-time lights, air quality, heat and floods, framed on India; each layer is a dated NASA product.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 2
People and exposure
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
Population density, night-time lights, air quality, heat and floods, framed on India.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place; claim ceiling INTEGRATED.
Layers and dates
A working group could define how exclusion from DPI is measured, serving digital agencies and inclusion advocates. Its indicator note would use data engineering and survey methods and the identity and authentication topic. Agencies, advocates and engineers would review the indicators together before they are used in assessments.
| Question | Possible deliverable | Disciplines |
|---|---|---|
| How should exclusion from DPI be measured? | An indicator note | Statistics, digital identity |
Write to contact@therisk.global. The acknowledgement gives a reference and names the next step.
Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Working group | A team adopted to deliver a defined piece of work under terms of reference, with a workplan, a supervisor and an end date; it has no public authority beyond its workplan. |
| Terms of reference | The document that defines an assignment's objectives, scope, deliverables, counterpart, acceptance criteria and reserved decisions. |
| Work breakdown structure | A hierarchical breakdown of a project's scope into manageable work packages. |
| Authentication | Verifying that a user is who they claim to be before granting access. |
The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.
The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.