Skip to content
Trust Governance Integrity
Evidence before claims, records before status

Governance and integrity you can examine.

As Lead Institution of the Nexus Consortium, the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) publishes its rules before anyone relies on its findings: who decides what, how conflicts are managed, how a finding is accepted and corrected, and where to raise a concern. Every route is open to anyone, without membership or payment.

Integrity registerGCRI Canada · GCRI US
  1. PrinciplesEvidence before claims, records before status, readiness before handoff
  2. DecisionsOne accountable holder for each; GCRI prepares evidence and takes no public decision
  3. FindingsAccepted on method by reviewers who declare their conflicts
  4. CorrectionsOpen to anyone; each becomes a new recorded version

Not an emergency service, regulator or funder

01Decision rights

Who decides what, and who is accountable.

Each decision has one accountable holder. GCRI prepares the evidence; governments, operators and licensed institutions take the decisions that are theirs.

DecisionAccountableWhat that means
Consortium Secretariat and contractingGCRI Canada, as Lead Institution and lead contracting organisationOne coordinated programme with separate institutional responsibilities
Evidence, methods and technical assistanceGCRI technical and evidence stewardshipProblems become testable questions and reusable capability
Leadership, convening and Universe governanceThe Global Risks Forum (GRF), independent consortium steward, within its instrumentsYear-round convening leads to one tested annual programme
Finance, insurance and capital readinessThe Global Risks Alliance (GRA), independent consortium stewardEvidence becomes diligence material, never an approval or a transaction
Technology and infrastructure supplyExternal providers, at arm’s length, under agreements GCRI Canada holdsA provider owns no finding, no national data and no decision
National agenda and local participationCompetent National consortium structuresNational ownership precedes federation
Scientific and editorial acceptanceQualified, conflict-managed reviewers and the publisherInstitutional influence cannot decide a scientific conclusion
Public decisions and executionThe relevant government, operator or licensed institutionThe programme prepares evidence and supports lawful continuation
02Neutrality and conflicts

No one can buy a finding.

Support of any kind buys nothing in the findings. The rules bind every funder, sponsor, member, host and technology provider.

Neutral by design

No support buys a finding, a ranking, an appointment, consent, procurement advantage or the suppression of a limitation.

Conflicts declared

Reviewers and leaders declare their interests. A reviewer with a declared conflict does not sign the acceptance it concerns.

Funding disclosed

Funding and review are disclosed with each publication, and sponsorship has no say in a test result.

03Acceptance and corrections

Findings are accepted on method and corrected in the open.

Each finding is linked to its sources, methods and review, with its uncertainty stated. Qualified reviewers who manage their conflicts accept it on method, not on who funded or hosted the work.

  1. 01

    Evidence labels

    Every result carries one: observed, published statistics, institution-reported, estimated, modelled, forecast, scenario, expert judgement or unknown. Missing data is shown as missing, never as zero.

  2. 02

    Review before release

    Domain and editorial review precede publication. Release follows review, not publicity deadlines, and a planned report is not shown as released.

  3. 03

    Corrections as versions

    Anyone can challenge a public finding. A correction creates a new recorded version with its history, never a silent edit.

Fig. 01A country report edition, with its evidence labels and version history.Example screen with illustrative values, not results.

Country report edition, example screenAn illustrative report edition: the annual flagship of the Country Systems Risk and Resilience Report with its chapters, the evidence labels every finding carries, a review chain from methods to publisher sign-off, and a version history in which a correction creates a new version.
04Raise a concern

Six routes, each with its own address.

Write to the address for your route and name the matter in the subject. None requires membership, an account or payment. Every concern then runs the same four steps.

RouteWrite toWho handles it
Ordinary enquirythe contact formThe Secretariat, for programme questions and cooperation requests
Scientific correction or integrity concernthe integrity concern formThe responsible editor or source owner; open to anyone
Privacy and rights requestthe privacy request formThe Interim Privacy Officer of GCRI Canada
Security reportthe security report formThe security disclosure team
Safeguarding concernthe safeguarding report formA restricted route, not handled in public forums or by a chatbot
Programme or decision complaintthe integrity concern formSomeone not responsible for the contested decision
Privacy

Enquiries are used to answer the enquiry and to keep a record of it. therisk.global has its own privacy notice, and GCRI Canada is its controller; GRF and GRA have their own notices and controllers.

Map tools

The maps on this site have expert tools that run in your browser; files you add to them are never uploaded. How the map tools work.

Accessibility

This site is designed to meet WCAG 2.2 level AA. We test pages and fix barriers we find. Report a barrier to the privacy request form or the contact form.

  1. 01

    Received

    An acknowledgement with a reference and the next step.

    Held by
    The receiving route
    Record
    Reference and date
  2. 02

    Reviewed independently

    By someone not responsible for the work or decision in question.

    Held by
    The responsible editor or reviewer
    Record
    Declared conflicts
  3. 03

    Reasoned disposition

    Accepted, partly accepted or declined, with the reasons in writing.

    Held by
    The reviewer
    Record
    Disposition and reasons
  4. 04

    Corrected in the open

    An accepted correction becomes a new version with its history.

    Held by
    The publisher
    Record
    Version, never a silent edit

No route promises a response time at the current service level. The Consortium is not an emergency service; in immediate danger, contact your local emergency services.

05Statuses and memberships

Where GCRI takes part, in exact terms.

These statuses and memberships belong to GCRI alone. They do not extend to GRF, GRA or any participant, and no body named here endorses a Consortium programme.

  1. 01

    Special consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)

    Since 2023

  2. 02

    Member of the Civil Society Policy Forum of the World Bank Group and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)

  3. 03

    Member of the Santiago Network for averting, minimising and addressing loss and damage under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)

  4. 04

    Observer of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)

  5. 05

    Member of Alliance 2030, Canada’s national network for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  6. 06

    Member of the Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN)

  7. 07

    Lead organisation of the Nexus Consortium 2030 Horizon

07Questions

Questions about governance and integrity.

How do I report an error in a GCRI publication?
Write to the integrity concern form with “Scientific correction” in the subject, naming the publication, the passage and the evidence. The responsible editor or source owner reviews it. If accepted, the correction is published as a new recorded version. No membership or payment is needed.
Can a funder or sponsor influence GCRI’s findings?
No. Findings are accepted on method by qualified reviewers who manage their conflicts. No support buys a finding, a ranking, an appointment or the suppression of a limitation, and funding is disclosed with each publication.
Do GCRI’s statuses extend to GRF, GRA or Consortium programmes?
No. These statuses and memberships belong to GCRI only. They do not extend to The Global Risks Forum, The Global Risks Alliance or participating institutions, and they are not endorsements of Consortium programmes by the bodies named.
How is a complaint about a decision handled?
Write to the integrity concern form. A complaint is reviewed by someone who was not responsible for the contested decision, and a rejected recommendation receives a reasoned disposition rather than disappearing.
Who is responsible for my personal data?
GCRI Canada is responsible for personal data in the service it provides and is the controller for therisk.global. Enquiries are used to answer the enquiry and keep a record of it. Privacy requests go to its Interim Privacy Officer at privacy@therisk.global, and the privacy notice of therisk.global sets out the details.
Does GCRI respond to emergencies?
No. The Consortium is not an emergency service and does not issue warnings. In immediate danger, contact your local emergency services and follow the instructions of your authorities.
ReportsContribute

Contribute evidence from this page.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRI
Consortium Secretariat

If something is wrong, tell us.

Corrections and concerns are part of the work. The acknowledgement gives a reference and names the next step, and no membership or account is needed.