Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

  • Reports
  • Baseline Edition 2026
  • Complete edition

Strategic Systems Report 2026: Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints

Edition home

Choose A4 or Letter in the print dialog; running heads and page numbers are added in print. This is a review copy: the signed PDF with its DOI is issued at release.

ReportsSR-03

Strategic Systems

Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints 2026

Baseline Edition 2026NR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINEGCRI for the Nexus Consortium

Imprint

Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor, the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI)
Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) for the Nexus Consortium, Toronto
Report number
NR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE
Evidence close
30 September 2026, cut DC-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Status
Draft under stewardship review; not yet released
DOI and UNI
Issued at deposit
Licence
CC BY 4.0 for Nexus-authored text, tables and figures; third-party material keeps its own licence
Cite as
Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Strategic Systems Report 2026: Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI). https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/editions/sr-03/

Contents

  1. ·

    Executive summary

  2. 1

    Chapter 1. Trade moves through a few narrow places

  3. 2

    Chapter 2. Key findings

  4. 3

    Chapter 3. Systems and sectors at baseline

  5. 4

    Chapter 4. Risks and capability

  6. 5

    Chapter 5. A chokepoint closure that overlaps a Red Sea diversion and high freight rates

  7. 6

    Chapter 6. Readings from the other desks

  8. 7

    Chapter 7. The 2027 agenda

  9. 8

    Chapter 8. Systems in depth

  10. A

    Annex A. Methodology

  11. B

    Annex B. Data appendix

  12. C

    Annex C. References and record

Executive summary

The edition on a few pages: the abstract, the key messages, the headline finding and what each steward reads in it.

7 min read1 figure0 tables13 notesNR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

S.1Abstract

Supply chains are the networks that move goods, energy and inputs between producers and users. The 2024 to 2026 evidence shows the same mechanisms at work in very different events. Seaborne trade volume grew 2.2 percent in 2024, but distance-adjusted trade grew 5.9 percent to 66,781 billion ton-miles, the fastest pace since 2011, because ships were rerouted around the Cape of Good Hope1. The Suez Canal handles about 10 percent of maritime trade volume and 22 percent of container trade, and its tonnage was still 70 percent below 2023 levels in May 202543. From early March 2026 the Strait of Hormuz, which carried about 20.7 million barrels of oil a day in 2024, saw daily transits fall from about 130 to 6, and Middle East crude oil production shut-ins tied to the closure averaged 9.4 million barrels a day from March to June 2026, against 25.2 million barrels a day of production in February7546. About one third of seaborne fertiliser trade normally passes through it6. Even so, the WTO March 2026 baseline put 2026 merchandise volume growth at 1.9 percent, after 4.6 percent in 2025, and at 1.4 percent if high energy prices persist13. China’s April 2025 rare earth controls remain in place, and the October 2025 expansion is suspended only until 10 November 202622. This baseline reads these events as mechanisms, not as a list. It ranks no route or country, attributes no attack and recommends no policy.

S.2Key messages

Six readings that frame the supply chains and chokepoints baseline, and the eight questions this edition answers, each with its status and source.

  1. Yes: conflict, attacks on vessels, water levels and trade controls recur across routes.14522

    Do supply chain disruptions have common causes?Reported

  2. Through shared dependence on a few straits, canals and processors.4746

    How do disruptions spread?Reported

  3. Ton-miles rose 5.9 percent in 2024 against 2.2 percent for volume.1

    How large is the rerouting effect?Reported

  4. About one fifth of oil and LNG and about one third of seaborne fertiliser pass through Hormuz.786

    How exposed are energy and fertiliser flows?Reported

  5. Merchandise volume grew 4.6 percent in 2025 and the WTO March 2026 baseline for 2026 is 1.9 percent.13

    Has trade held up?Reported

  6. About 72 percent of merchandise trade is on MFN terms.15

    Do trade rules still apply?Reported

  7. A composite of USD 4,429 per 40ft container in the last week of October 2026.16

    What do freight rates show?Reported

  8. A chokepoint closure that overlaps a Red Sea diversion and high freight rates. SCN-SR03-CHK-01

    What will 2027 test first?Expert input

S.3Headline finding

ReportedEQL 3NRF-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-CON-007

Daily transits through the Strait of Hormuz fell from about 130 in February 2026 to 6 in March, a drop of about 95 percent, and sources differ on the February base.

Figure S.1Strait of Hormuz daily transits, 2026
ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
February (about)≈130
March6

Source: UNCTAD rapid assessment5. The WTO cites 138 vessels a day before the closure13; the drop is a Nexus derivation, method (3).

A closure of one strait removes a large share of oil, LNG and fertiliser flows at once, so buffers, bypass routes and the speed of reopening matter more than the cause. Daily counts differ by source and by what is counted51320.

S.4At a glance

66,781billion ton-miles

seaborne trade, 20241

≈95%

Hormuz transit drop, March 20265

1.9%

WTO March 2026 baseline, 202613

72%

trade on MFN terms15

4,429USD per 40ft

Drewry composite, 29 Oct 202616

≈1/3

seaborne fertiliser via Hormuz6

S.5What each steward reads in it

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports reading trade as a network with narrow places.

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people supply chain failure arrives as a higher price at the pump, on a food label or on a device.

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. Freight, insurance and fuel costs moved sharply, and projected canal revenue halved in one year.

NEXUS

Synthesis

Trade risk is well described route by route and thinly measured as a system.

S.6What this edition is, and is not

What this edition is

A baseline: the 2026 state of the world’s supply chains, trade routes and chokepoints and the couplings through which it carries risk into other systems. It synthesises published evidence and ranks no country, company or asset.

What it is not

Not a trade-policy ranking, a threat attribution, a sanctions or export-control opinion or an assessment of any carrier, port, state or company. Operation of routes, ports and canals rests with their owners, operators and competent authorities.

What comes next

National, regional and sector evidence feeds the 2027 supply chains and chokepoints edition through the federation. Each edition reports what changed against this baseline: observations, source revisions, method changes, scenario updates and corrections.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025, chapter I: International maritime trade (12,720 million tons and 66,781 billion ton-miles in 2024; Cape detour about 30 percent; cobalt and copper concentration). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 4UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2024, chapter II: World shipping fleet and services (Suez Canal about 10 percent of maritime trade volume and 22 percent of container trade; Panama Canal about 3 percent). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 3UNCTAD (ed.), Maritime trade under pressure, growth set to stall in 2025 (news item; Suez Canal tonnage 70 percent below 2023 in May 2025; Shanghai Containerized Freight Index averaged 2,496 in 2024). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 7EIA (ed.), World Oil Transit Chokepoints (last updated 3 March 2026; 2024 total oil flows: Hormuz 20.7, Malacca 22.5, Suez and SUMED 4.8, Bab el-Mandeb 4.1, Cape of Good Hope 9.3 million barrels a day). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 5UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption deepens global economic strain across trade, prices and finance (second rapid assessment; transits about 130 a day in February and 6 in March 2026; merchandise trade growth 1.5 to 2.5 percent projected for 2026). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 46EIA (ed.), Short-Term Energy Outlook, September 2026, global oil markets (Brent averaged USD 91 a barrel in August 2026; Middle East crude oil production shut-ins from the Hormuz closure averaged 9.4 million barrels a day from March to June 2026 against February production of 25.2, and were 5.0 in July and 6.7 in August). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 6UNCTAD (ed.), initial assessment of the Strait of Hormuz disruption of 10 March 2026 (about one third of global seaborne fertiliser trade, about 16 million tonnes), as reported by a Pakistani daily newspaper; the UNCTAD text itself was not opened. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 13WTO (ed.), Global Trade Outlook and Statistics, news release of 19 March 2026 (2025 merchandise volume growth 4.6 percent; 2026 baseline 1.9 percent; high-energy-price case 1.4 percent; Hormuz traffic from 138 vessels a day to almost zero). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 22China Briefing (ed.), How will China’s rare earth export controls impact industries and businesses? (April 2025 controls on seven elements; 9 October 2025 expansion to five more; suspended until 10 November 2026). Dezan Shira and Associates, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 8EIA (ed.), Amid regional conflict, the Strait of Hormuz remains critical oil chokepoint (Today in Energy, 16 June 2025; about 20 million barrels a day, about one fifth of global LNG trade in 2024). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 15WTO (ed.), World Trade Report 2026: A critical juncture for the world trading system (about 72 percent of merchandise trade on MFN terms). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 16POST-CLOSE, context only: Drewry (ed.), World Container Index (assessment of 29 October 2026; composite USD 4,429 per 40ft; Shanghai to Los Angeles USD 7,514; Shanghai to Rotterdam USD 3,686; two vessels transiting Hormuz and 62 vessels through Suez in the previous week). Drewry Shipping Consultants, London. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 20News report, Facts about the Strait of Hormuz since its negotiated reopening (last updated 8 April 2026; Kpler: average of eight commodity carriers a day from 1 March to 7 April; Lloyd’s List estimate of about 800 ships stuck in the Gulf; two-week ceasefire). Arab News Pakistan, Islamabad. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Trade moves through a few narrow places

Part I describes systems and their couplings. It ranks no country or operator and assesses no authority.

7 min read2 figures1 table13 notesNR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

1.1The questions this part answers

Key questions

  • Where is supply chains and chokepoints risk concentrated?
  • Which couplings carry supply chains and chokepoints shocks into other systems?
  • Which supply chains and chokepoints capabilities hold under compound stress?
  • What must 2027 evidence measure first?

In this part

  • Narrative
  • Headline finding
  • Lead figure
  • Five mechanism chapters
  • Twelve-domain reading
  • Sector screens
  • Dependency matrix
  • Risk objects
  • Capability ladder
  • Scenario
  • Three lenses
  • Portfolio

1.2The argument

Global trade is usually reported as flows between countries. The 2024 to 2026 evidence reads it as a network with narrow places: straits, canals and a few processing hubs. Ships carry most of the world’s goods, and the routes they take decide cost, time and exposure14.

The causes repeat. Attacks on vessels moved Red Sea traffic around Africa in 20241. Low water levels cut Panama Canal transits until mid-202414. A war closed the Strait of Hormuz to most traffic from March 2026546. Export licences govern a set of rare earth elements22.

The effects reach beyond shipping. About one fifth of oil and LNG and about one third of seaborne fertiliser normally pass through Hormuz786. Urea prices rose 52 percent in the United States and 60 percent in Brazil by mid-April 202617.

Aggregate trade has held up. The WTO March 2026 baseline put 2026 merchandise volume growth at 1.9 percent after 4.6 percent in 2025, and 72 percent of merchandise trade still runs on MFN terms1315. The edition therefore asks four questions of every event: what was the common cause, how did it spread, what was shared, and what threshold was crossed. It makes no attribution and ranks no route.

Figure 1.1How did the WTO see 2026 trade in March? Merchandise volume growth, percent

The March 2026 baseline put 2026 growth at 1.9 percent, after 4.6 percent in 2025, and 1.4 percent if high energy prices persist. The bars are an estimate and two forecasts and are not added13.

ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
2025 estimate4.6
March 2026 baseline1.9
March 2026 high-energy-price case1.4

Source: as cited in the note to this figure. Year 2026.

Figure ID FIG-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-01-003

1.9%

March 2026 baseline, 202613

1.4%

high-energy-price case, 202613

4.6%

merchandise volume growth, 202513

−9.7%

Middle East export volumes, first quarter 2026, year on year14

1.3Twenty couplings between five systems

The supply chains and chokepoints-centred matrix types the twenty couplings between the five core systems, read for their supply chains and chokepoints content. Strengths are Nexus estimates (ESTIMATED) from the cited evidence and analogue events; they set the graph that 2027 evidence will test.

Figure 1.2Couplings between the five systems

Each line is one coupling from one system to another, drawn by the strength the edition assigns. Strengths are Nexus estimates from the cited evidence and analogue events.

  • Strong
  • Moderate
  • Weak

Source: this edition’s coupling matrix (Table 1.1); status Estimated.

Table 1.1Coupling matrix: from the row system to the column system
From, toWATENEFOOHLTBIO
WAT Water·WEAK
cooling
MODERATE
irrigation · processing
MODERATE
safe supply · hospitals
WEAK
flows
ENE EnergyMODERATE
pumping · desalination
·STRONG
fuel · fertiliser feedstock · cold chain
STRONG
freight · hospital supply
WEAK
land use
FOO FoodWEAK
withdrawals
WEAK
biofuels
·MODERATE
nutrition · food safety
WEAK
land conversion
HLT HealthWEAK
workforce
WEAK
workforce
WEAK
labour
·WEAK
residues
BIO BiodiversityWEAK
natural infrastructure
WEAK
hydrology
WEAK
pollination
WEAK
zoonoses
·
Strength: strong, moderate or weak; a Nexus estimate (status Estimated) from cited evidence and analogue events. The scale is defined in Annex A.

Transmission paths

  1. 01

    ENE → FOO

    A strait closure removes fuel and fertiliser inputs together.

    Reported 2026 Hormuz64617

  2. 02

    CON → TRD → INF

    Attacks on vessels reroute ships and lift distance.

    Reported 2024 Red Sea1

  3. 03

    CLI → INF → TRD

    Low water levels cut canal transits.

    Reported Panama to mid-202414

  4. 04

    TRD → FIN

    Lost transit revenue reaches national budgets.

    Reported Suez18

  5. 05

    MIN → TRD

    Export licences on processed minerals reach downstream makers.

    Reported 2025 controls22

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025, chapter I: International maritime trade (12,720 million tons and 66,781 billion ton-miles in 2024; Cape detour about 30 percent; cobalt and copper concentration). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 4UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2024, chapter II: World shipping fleet and services (Suez Canal about 10 percent of maritime trade volume and 22 percent of container trade; Panama Canal about 3 percent). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 5UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption deepens global economic strain across trade, prices and finance (second rapid assessment; transits about 130 a day in February and 6 in March 2026; merchandise trade growth 1.5 to 2.5 percent projected for 2026). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 46EIA (ed.), Short-Term Energy Outlook, September 2026, global oil markets (Brent averaged USD 91 a barrel in August 2026; Middle East crude oil production shut-ins from the Hormuz closure averaged 9.4 million barrels a day from March to June 2026 against February production of 25.2, and were 5.0 in July and 6.7 in August). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 22China Briefing (ed.), How will China’s rare earth export controls impact industries and businesses? (April 2025 controls on seven elements; 9 October 2025 expansion to five more; suspended until 10 November 2026). Dezan Shira and Associates, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 7EIA (ed.), World Oil Transit Chokepoints (last updated 3 March 2026; 2024 total oil flows: Hormuz 20.7, Malacca 22.5, Suez and SUMED 4.8, Bab el-Mandeb 4.1, Cape of Good Hope 9.3 million barrels a day). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 8EIA (ed.), Amid regional conflict, the Strait of Hormuz remains critical oil chokepoint (Today in Energy, 16 June 2025; about 20 million barrels a day, about one fifth of global LNG trade in 2024). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 6UNCTAD (ed.), initial assessment of the Strait of Hormuz disruption of 10 March 2026 (about one third of global seaborne fertiliser trade, about 16 million tonnes), as reported by a Pakistani daily newspaper; the UNCTAD text itself was not opened. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 17FAO (ed.), Strait of Hormuz crisis: FAO Director-General outlines risks, actions and policy responses (remarks to the 180th Council session, 28 April 2026; urea up 52 percent in the United States and 60 percent in Brazil by mid-April). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 13WTO (ed.), Global Trade Outlook and Statistics, news release of 19 March 2026 (2025 merchandise volume growth 4.6 percent; 2026 baseline 1.9 percent; high-energy-price case 1.4 percent; Hormuz traffic from 138 vessels a day to almost zero). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 15WTO (ed.), World Trade Report 2026: A critical juncture for the world trading system (about 72 percent of merchandise trade on MFN terms). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 14WTO and UNCTAD (eds.), Global goods trade resilient in Q1 2026 despite Middle East war (WTO news item of 31 July 2026; Middle East export volumes down 9.7 percent and import volumes down 11.9 percent year on year in the first quarter). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 18IMF (ed.), fourth review of Egypt’s arrangement (Suez Canal revenue USD 6.6 billion in FY2023/24 and projected USD 3.6 billion in FY2024/25), as reported by Hellenic Shipping News from Arab Finance; the IMF report itself was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Key findings

Twelve findings carry the supply chains and chokepoints baseline. They are grouped by coupling and never ranked. Each resolves to its source or, where Nexus analysis is involved, to its stated method.

6 min read1 figure0 tables14 notesNR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

2.1Headline finding

ReportedEQL 3NRF-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-CON-007

Daily transits through the Strait of Hormuz fell from about 130 in February 2026 to 6 in March, a drop of about 95 percent, and sources differ on the February base.

Figure 2.1Strait of Hormuz daily transits, 2026
ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
February (about)≈130
March6

Source: UNCTAD rapid assessment5. The WTO cites 138 vessels a day before the closure13; the drop is a Nexus derivation, method (3).

Implication

A closure of one strait removes a large share of oil, LNG and fertiliser flows at once, so buffers, bypass routes and the speed of reopening matter more than the cause. Daily counts differ by source and by what is counted51320.

What would move it

Verified transit counts, the duration of the closure and the pace of any return of traffic would each move this finding.

2.2Trade

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-TRD-001

    Seaborne trade reached 12,720 million tons in 2024, up 2.2 percent, and 66,781 billion ton-miles, up 5.9 percent, the fastest rise since 2011, mainly because of Red Sea rerouting.1

2.3Infrastructure

  1. ReportedEQL 3NRF-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-002

    The detour around the Cape of Good Hope added about 30 percent to voyage lengths and an estimated 11 percent to container TEU-mile demand.1

  2. ReportedEQL 4NRF-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-003

    The Suez Canal handles about 10 percent of world maritime trade volume and 22 percent of container trade, and the Panama Canal about 3 percent; by June 2024 transits through both were down by over half from their peaks.4

  3. ReportedEQL 4NRF-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-004

    Suez Canal tonnage was still 70 percent below 2023 levels in May 2025, while the Panama Canal recorded 13,404 transits and 489.1 million tons in fiscal year 2025, up 19.3 and 15.6 percent.310

2.4Energy

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-ENE-005

    The Strait of Hormuz carried 20.7 million barrels of oil a day in 2024 in the EIA table, about one fifth of global liquids consumption, and about one fifth of global LNG trade.78

2.5CON

  1. ReportedEQL 3NRF-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-CON-006

    Estimated Middle East crude oil production shut-ins from the Hormuz closure averaged 9.4 million barrels a day from March to June 2026, against 25.2 million barrels a day of production in February, and were 6.7 in August. NOT BOUND at the close: Hormuz oil and LNG flow series after the second quarter of 2026.46

  2. ReportedEQL 3NRF-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-CON-007

    Daily transits through the Strait of Hormuz fell from about 130 in February 2026 to 6 in March, a drop of about 95 percent, and sources differ on the February base.513

2.6Finance

  1. ReportedEQL 3NRF-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-FIN-008

    The WTO March 2026 baseline put 2026 merchandise volume growth at 1.9 percent after 4.6 percent in 2025, and at 1.4 percent if high energy prices persist, while UNCTAD projected 1.5 to 2.5 percent. NOT BOUND at the close: any later revision of the 2026 forecast.135

  2. ReportedEQL 2NRF-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-FIN-011

    The IMF projected Suez Canal revenue at USD 3.6 billion in fiscal year 2024/25 against USD 6.6 billion a year earlier, with transit trade at about a third of pre-conflict levels.18

2.7Food

  1. ReportedEQL 3NRF-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-FOO-009

    About one third of seaborne fertiliser trade, about 16 million tonnes, normally passes through the Strait of Hormuz, and urea prices rose 52 percent in the United States and 60 percent in Brazil by mid-April 2026.617

2.8Minerals

  1. ReportedEQL 3NRF-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-MIN-010

    China’s April 2025 export controls on seven rare earth elements remain in force, and the October 2025 expansion to five more elements is suspended only until 10 November 2026.22

2.9Systemic

  1. Expert inputEQL 2NRF-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-SYS-012

    The leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is a chokepoint closure that overlaps a Red Sea diversion and high freight rates. § scenario

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 5UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption deepens global economic strain across trade, prices and finance (second rapid assessment; transits about 130 a day in February and 6 in March 2026; merchandise trade growth 1.5 to 2.5 percent projected for 2026). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 13WTO (ed.), Global Trade Outlook and Statistics, news release of 19 March 2026 (2025 merchandise volume growth 4.6 percent; 2026 baseline 1.9 percent; high-energy-price case 1.4 percent; Hormuz traffic from 138 vessels a day to almost zero). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 20News report, Facts about the Strait of Hormuz since its negotiated reopening (last updated 8 April 2026; Kpler: average of eight commodity carriers a day from 1 March to 7 April; Lloyd’s List estimate of about 800 ships stuck in the Gulf; two-week ceasefire). Arab News Pakistan, Islamabad. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025, chapter I: International maritime trade (12,720 million tons and 66,781 billion ton-miles in 2024; Cape detour about 30 percent; cobalt and copper concentration). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 4UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2024, chapter II: World shipping fleet and services (Suez Canal about 10 percent of maritime trade volume and 22 percent of container trade; Panama Canal about 3 percent). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 3UNCTAD (ed.), Maritime trade under pressure, growth set to stall in 2025 (news item; Suez Canal tonnage 70 percent below 2023 in May 2025; Shanghai Containerized Freight Index averaged 2,496 in 2024). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 10Panama Canal Authority (ed.), Panama Canal maintains operational and financial strength (press release of 8 October 2025; fiscal year 2025: 13,404 transits and 489.1 million CP/SUAB tons; preliminary and unaudited). Autoridad del Canal de Panama, Panama City. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 7EIA (ed.), World Oil Transit Chokepoints (last updated 3 March 2026; 2024 total oil flows: Hormuz 20.7, Malacca 22.5, Suez and SUMED 4.8, Bab el-Mandeb 4.1, Cape of Good Hope 9.3 million barrels a day). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 8EIA (ed.), Amid regional conflict, the Strait of Hormuz remains critical oil chokepoint (Today in Energy, 16 June 2025; about 20 million barrels a day, about one fifth of global LNG trade in 2024). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 46EIA (ed.), Short-Term Energy Outlook, September 2026, global oil markets (Brent averaged USD 91 a barrel in August 2026; Middle East crude oil production shut-ins from the Hormuz closure averaged 9.4 million barrels a day from March to June 2026 against February production of 25.2, and were 5.0 in July and 6.7 in August). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 18IMF (ed.), fourth review of Egypt’s arrangement (Suez Canal revenue USD 6.6 billion in FY2023/24 and projected USD 3.6 billion in FY2024/25), as reported by Hellenic Shipping News from Arab Finance; the IMF report itself was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 6UNCTAD (ed.), initial assessment of the Strait of Hormuz disruption of 10 March 2026 (about one third of global seaborne fertiliser trade, about 16 million tonnes), as reported by a Pakistani daily newspaper; the UNCTAD text itself was not opened. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 17FAO (ed.), Strait of Hormuz crisis: FAO Director-General outlines risks, actions and policy responses (remarks to the 180th Council session, 28 April 2026; urea up 52 percent in the United States and 60 percent in Brazil by mid-April). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 22China Briefing (ed.), How will China’s rare earth export controls impact industries and businesses? (April 2025 controls on seven elements; 9 October 2025 expansion to five more; suspended until 10 November 2026). Dezan Shira and Associates, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Systems and sectors at baseline

6 min read0 figures2 tables16 notesNR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

3.1Where each system stood at evidence close

TRD · Volume

Seaborne trade volume, 2024

12,720million tons

up 2.2%.

Reported2024UNCTAD1

INF · Distance

Seaborne trade in ton-miles, 2024

66,781billion ton-miles

up 5.9%, fastest since 2011.

Reported2024UNCTAD1

ENE · Hormuz, 2024

Total oil flow through the strait

20.7million b/d

EIA table; LNG about one fifth of trade.

Reported2024EIA78

CON · Hormuz, 2026

Crude oil shut-ins, March to June average

9.4million b/d

against 25.2 produced in February.

Reported2026EIA46

FIN · Trade outlook

WTO 2026 merchandise volume growth, March baseline

1.9%

1.4% in the high-energy-price case.

Reported2026WTO13

FOO · Fertiliser

Share of seaborne fertiliser trade through Hormuz

≈1/3about 16 million tonnes

UNCTAD estimate, March 2026.

Reported2026UNCTAD6

3.2Domain posture

Each of the twelve coupled domains is read through supply chains and chokepoints, in words, not scored. The coupling column names the dependency that carries supply chains and chokepoints risk into each domain.

Table 3.1Each domain read in words, not scored
DomainPosture at baselineCouplingStatus
WATDesalination and pumping depend on energy; Gulf water systems not consolidated here.ENE → WATInferred EQL 2
ENEAbout one fifth of oil and LNG passes through Hormuz; oil production was shut in at scale in 2026.ENE → allReported EQL 4
FOOAbout one third of seaborne fertiliser passes through Hormuz; urea prices rose sharply.ENE → FOOReported EQL 3
HLTMedical supply chains depend on freight and energy; not consolidated here.ENE → HLTInferred EQL 2
BIOBulk trade routes and ports affect species movement; evidence not consolidated here.TRD → BIOExpert input EQL 2
CLILow water levels cut Panama Canal transits until mid-2024.CLI → INFReported EQL 3
INFCanals, straits and ports: Suez about 10 percent of maritime trade volume.the core systemReported EQL 4
FINWTO March baseline of 1.9 percent volume growth in 2026; Suez revenue projected to halve.TRD → FINReported EQL 4
DATVessel-tracking data are the main evidence and were unreliable for Hormuz in 2026.DAT ↔ TRDReported EQL 3
AICThe share of trade growth from AI-enabling goods is not bound at the close.AIC → TRDInferred EQL 2
MINRare earth controls and concentrated refining: about 85 percent top-country refining share in 2025.MIN → TRDReported EQL 3
TRDThe core system: 12,720 million tons and 66,781 billion ton-miles in 2024.the core systemReported EQL 4

3.3Sector screens

All sixteen sectors are screened for their dependence on supply chains and chokepoints, on the same grammar as every national edition. The evidence column describes coverage of the baseline evidence, not the performance of the sector.

Table 3.2Sectors: baseline evidence and the exposure to watch
CodeSectorBaseline evidenceExposure to watchEvidence coverage
GS-00Cross-systemtrade routes couple every sector14chokepoint closure with freight spikePARTIAL
GS-01Waterdesalination depends on energy and fuel flowsfuel loss at coastal plantsTHIN
GS-02EnergyHormuz-related oil shut-ins in 202646strait closureGOOD
GS-03Food and agrifoodabout one third of seaborne fertiliser via Hormuz617fertiliser and freight shocksPARTIAL
GS-04Healthmedical supply depends on freight and energyport closureTHIN
GS-05Finance and economyWTO March baseline 1.9 percent13trade shock and price spikePARTIAL
GS-06Developmenthigh transport costs hit small island and least developed states hardest2rerouting costsPARTIAL
GS-07Climatelow water levels cut Panama transits4water-level limits on canalsPARTIAL
GS-08Disasterport and route closures after hazardsconcurrent closuresTHIN
GS-09Infrastructurecanal and strait transits410canal capacity limitsGOOD
GS-10Citiesport cities depend on a few routesport disruptionTHIN
GS-11Biodiversityshipping routes shape pressure on ecosystemsroute shiftsTHIN
GS-12Earth observationvessel tracking underpins chokepoint evidence546tracking data gapsPARTIAL
GS-13Cyber and digitalport and vessel systems carry digital risksystems disruptionTHIN
GS-14PolicyMFN terms cover 72 percent of trade15; export controls22policy shocksGOOD
GS-15Sciencesupply network science is mature383940data at operating scalePARTIAL

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025, chapter I: International maritime trade (12,720 million tons and 66,781 billion ton-miles in 2024; Cape detour about 30 percent; cobalt and copper concentration). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 7EIA (ed.), World Oil Transit Chokepoints (last updated 3 March 2026; 2024 total oil flows: Hormuz 20.7, Malacca 22.5, Suez and SUMED 4.8, Bab el-Mandeb 4.1, Cape of Good Hope 9.3 million barrels a day). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 8EIA (ed.), Amid regional conflict, the Strait of Hormuz remains critical oil chokepoint (Today in Energy, 16 June 2025; about 20 million barrels a day, about one fifth of global LNG trade in 2024). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 46EIA (ed.), Short-Term Energy Outlook, September 2026, global oil markets (Brent averaged USD 91 a barrel in August 2026; Middle East crude oil production shut-ins from the Hormuz closure averaged 9.4 million barrels a day from March to June 2026 against February production of 25.2, and were 5.0 in July and 6.7 in August). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 13WTO (ed.), Global Trade Outlook and Statistics, news release of 19 March 2026 (2025 merchandise volume growth 4.6 percent; 2026 baseline 1.9 percent; high-energy-price case 1.4 percent; Hormuz traffic from 138 vessels a day to almost zero). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 6UNCTAD (ed.), initial assessment of the Strait of Hormuz disruption of 10 March 2026 (about one third of global seaborne fertiliser trade, about 16 million tonnes), as reported by a Pakistani daily newspaper; the UNCTAD text itself was not opened. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 4UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2024, chapter II: World shipping fleet and services (Suez Canal about 10 percent of maritime trade volume and 22 percent of container trade; Panama Canal about 3 percent). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 17FAO (ed.), Strait of Hormuz crisis: FAO Director-General outlines risks, actions and policy responses (remarks to the 180th Council session, 28 April 2026; urea up 52 percent in the United States and 60 percent in Brazil by mid-April). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 2UNCTAD (ed.), Stormy seas for global shipping: UNCTAD warns of uncertainty, volatility and rising costs (press release of 24 September 2025; 2025 volume growth 0.5 percent; port fees on certain vessels; alternative-fuel share 8 percent). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 10Panama Canal Authority (ed.), Panama Canal maintains operational and financial strength (press release of 8 October 2025; fiscal year 2025: 13,404 transits and 489.1 million CP/SUAB tons; preliminary and unaudited). Autoridad del Canal de Panama, Panama City. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 5UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption deepens global economic strain across trade, prices and finance (second rapid assessment; transits about 130 a day in February and 6 in March 2026; merchandise trade growth 1.5 to 2.5 percent projected for 2026). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 15WTO (ed.), World Trade Report 2026: A critical juncture for the world trading system (about 72 percent of merchandise trade on MFN terms). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 22China Briefing (ed.), How will China’s rare earth export controls impact industries and businesses? (April 2025 controls on seven elements; 9 October 2025 expansion to five more; suspended until 10 November 2026). Dezan Shira and Associates, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: Acemoglu, D., Carvalho, V.M., Ozdaglar, A. and Tahbaz-Salehi, A., The network origins of aggregate fluctuations, Econometrica 80(5), 1977 to 2016, 2012, cited from memory. Observation year 2012. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Carvalho, V.M., Nirei, M., Saito, Y.U. and Tahbaz-Salehi, A., Supply chain disruptions: evidence from the Great East Japan Earthquake, Quarterly Journal of Economics 136(2), 1255 to 1321, 2021, cited from memory. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: Barrot, J.-N. and Sauvagnat, J., Input specificity and the propagation of idiosyncratic shocks in production networks, Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(3), 1543 to 1592, 2016, cited from memory. Observation year 2016. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Risks and capability

Four global risk objects open the portfolio. Order carries no rank. Each is read across driver, exposure, vulnerability, capacity, cascade and consequence; loss metrics are added only where they can be modelled.

6 min read0 figures1 table22 notesNR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

4.1Risk objects

Each risk is read across the chain from hazard to consequence, with its status and evidence-quality level.

  1. ReportedEQL 4RSK-SR03-CON-001

    Strait closure with energy and fertiliser knock-on

    Driver
    war closing a strait to most traffic546
    Exposure
    oil, LNG and fertiliser importers in South Asia and Europe
    Vulnerability
    few bypass routes; thin stocks of fertiliser inputs
    Capacity
    strategic stocks; bypass pipelines; alternative suppliers
    Cascade
    ENE → FOO → HLT
    Horizon
    1 to 3 years
  2. ReportedEQL 4RSK-SR03-INF-002

    Red Sea diversion and loss of Suez capacity

    Driver
    attacks on vessels leading lines to route around Africa1
    Exposure
    East Asia to Europe container trade, Egypt’s canal revenue
    Vulnerability
    longer voyages absorb ship capacity
    Capacity
    route diversity; return of transits1916
    Cascade
    TRD → FIN → DEV
    Horizon
    1 to 3 years
  3. InferredEQL 3RSK-SR03-MIN-003

    Export licensing of processed minerals

    Driver
    licence requirements on rare earth elements22
    Exposure
    magnet, electronics and vehicle makers
    Vulnerability
    concentrated refining; no short-run substitute
    Capacity
    stocks; recycling; processing capacity outside the top refiner23
    Cascade
    MIN → TRD → AIC
    Horizon
    1 to 5 years
  4. ReportedEQL 3RSK-SR03-INF-004

    Canal capacity limits from water levels

    Driver
    low water levels limiting transits14
    Exposure
    US East Coast and Asia container, LPG and bulk trade
    Vulnerability
    single water source for a major canal
    Capacity
    draft and slot management; recovery to 13,404 transits in FY202510
    Cascade
    CLI → INF → TRD
    Horizon
    annual

4.2Capability ladder

Existence is not readiness. Each of the fifteen capability functions is placed on the ladder by the strongest public evidence at the global level, from a policy listing to performance in real events.

Table 4.1Capabilities on the ladder of evidence: listed, exists, demonstrated, tested
FunctionRungLevelStrongest public evidence at baseline
Prevention and mitigationEXISTSmaritime security regime and trade facilitation rules widespread; implementation uneven242533
Monitoring and observationADEQUATEvessel tracking and statistics; Hormuz series unreliable in 20264644
Early warningLISTEDno common cross-chokepoint warning; shipping advisories are issued per event
Preparedness and planningEXISTScritical raw materials and chips frameworks in force in the EU3536
Redundancy and reservesLISTEDstrategic stock and spare ship capacity not consolidated
ResponseDEMONSTRATEDrerouting around the Cape within weeks of the 2023 to 2024 attacks1
Continuity of critical servicesEXISTScanal operators recovered transits after the drought year10
RecoveryLISTEDrecovery of Hormuz flows after 2026 not verified at close
AdaptationEXISTSdiversification of origins and destinations reported1
Social protectionLISTEDsupport for importers of food and fuel not consolidated
Finance and insuranceLISTEDwar-risk insurance cost reported to rise; premiums not bound5
Institutional coordinationEXISTSWTO trade facilitation and straits law252930
Technical infrastructureEXISTScanal expansions and port systems; fleet partly ageing4
WorkforceLISTEDseafarer and port workforce not consolidated
Research capacityADEQUATEsupply network science mature3839404142
A capability listed in policy is not a tested one; each rung is the strongest public evidence at baseline.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 5UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption deepens global economic strain across trade, prices and finance (second rapid assessment; transits about 130 a day in February and 6 in March 2026; merchandise trade growth 1.5 to 2.5 percent projected for 2026). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 46EIA (ed.), Short-Term Energy Outlook, September 2026, global oil markets (Brent averaged USD 91 a barrel in August 2026; Middle East crude oil production shut-ins from the Hormuz closure averaged 9.4 million barrels a day from March to June 2026 against February production of 25.2, and were 5.0 in July and 6.7 in August). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025, chapter I: International maritime trade (12,720 million tons and 66,781 billion ton-miles in 2024; Cape detour about 30 percent; cobalt and copper concentration). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 19FreightWaves (ed.), Suez container ships near low for all of 2025 (2 December 2025; container transits about 4.7 to 5.0 a day in July to November 2025; sources include Xeneta and a shipping agency). FreightWaves, Chattanooga. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 16POST-CLOSE, context only: Drewry (ed.), World Container Index (assessment of 29 October 2026; composite USD 4,429 per 40ft; Shanghai to Los Angeles USD 7,514; Shanghai to Rotterdam USD 3,686; two vessels transiting Hormuz and 62 vessels through Suez in the previous week). Drewry Shipping Consultants, London. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 22China Briefing (ed.), How will China’s rare earth export controls impact industries and businesses? (April 2025 controls on seven elements; 9 October 2025 expansion to five more; suspended until 10 November 2026). Dezan Shira and Associates, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 23Investment Monitor (ed.), China rare earth curbs put USD 6.5 trillion of output at risk, article of 16 July 2026 reporting the IEA Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (about 85 percent top-country rare earth refining share in 2025; investment down 9 percent in 2025); the IEA report itself was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 4UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2024, chapter II: World shipping fleet and services (Suez Canal about 10 percent of maritime trade volume and 22 percent of container trade; Panama Canal about 3 percent). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 10Panama Canal Authority (ed.), Panama Canal maintains operational and financial strength (press release of 8 October 2025; fiscal year 2025: 13,404 transits and 489.1 million CP/SUAB tons; preliminary and unaudited). Autoridad del Canal de Panama, Panama City. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 24IMO (ed.), SOLAS chapter XI-2 and the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (web page; mandatory Part A and guidance Part B; in force 1 July 2004). International Maritime Organization, London. Observation year 2004. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 25WTO (ed.), Trade Facilitation Agreement (web page; Bali Ministerial Conference 2013; in force 22 February 2017). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO 28000:2022, Security and resilience: security management systems for the supply chain. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 44UNVERIFIED, not opened: IMF (ed.), PortWatch, chokepoint transit and trade monitoring platform; the dashboard page returned no readable content and no figure is used. International Monetary Fund, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials (Critical Raw Materials Act), Official Journal of the European Union, 2024, cited from memory; the EUR-Lex request returned no text. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: Regulation (EU) 2023/1781 establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s semiconductor ecosystem (Chips Act), Official Journal of the European Union, 2023, cited from memory. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 29UNVERIFIED, not opened: United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982), regime of transit passage through straits used for international navigation, cited from memory. United Nations, New York. Observation year 1982. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: Convention regarding the Regime of the Straits (Montreux Convention), 1936, cited from memory. Observation year 1936. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: Acemoglu, D., Carvalho, V.M., Ozdaglar, A. and Tahbaz-Salehi, A., The network origins of aggregate fluctuations, Econometrica 80(5), 1977 to 2016, 2012, cited from memory. Observation year 2012. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Carvalho, V.M., Nirei, M., Saito, Y.U. and Tahbaz-Salehi, A., Supply chain disruptions: evidence from the Great East Japan Earthquake, Quarterly Journal of Economics 136(2), 1255 to 1321, 2021, cited from memory. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: Barrot, J.-N. and Sauvagnat, J., Input specificity and the propagation of idiosyncratic shocks in production networks, Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(3), 1543 to 1592, 2016, cited from memory. Observation year 2016. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: Baldwin, R. and Freeman, R., Risks and global supply chains: what we know and what we need to know, Annual Review of Economics 14, 153 to 180, 2022, cited from memory. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 42UNVERIFIED, not opened: Benigno, G., di Giovanni, J., Groen, J.J.J. and Noble, A.I., The Global Supply Chain Pressure Index: a new tool to measure supply chain disruptions, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 2022, cited from memory; the index page returned no definition. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

A chokepoint closure that overlaps a Red Sea diversion and high freight rates

A conditional statement under stated assumptions, never a prediction.

2 min read0 figures0 tables3 notesNR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

5.1Assumptions

Scenario SCN-SR03-CHK-01: what is assumed, and what is held constant.

Baseline
the 2026 reference state in this edition
Drivers
a strait closure that removes energy and fertiliser flows while container ships still route around Africa
Analogues
Hormuz, March 2026; Red Sea rerouting, 20245461
Interventions
none modelled: the specification describes the unmitigated case
Run state
narrative specification; quantified run scheduled for 2027

5.2The cascade, step by step

  1. 1

    CON → ENE

    transits through the strait fall by about 95 percent

    2026

  2. 2

    ENE → TRD

    tanker rates, war-risk cover and bunker costs rise

    2026

  3. 3

    ENE → FOO

    fertiliser deliveries are delayed and prices rise

    2026

  4. 4

    TRD → INF

    ships stay on long routes, so capacity stays tight

    2024

  5. 5

    TRD → FIN

    importers face higher bills; canal revenue stays low

    2025

  6. 6

    FIN → DEV

    import-dependent economies cut spending

    2026

5.3The scenario as a table of steps

How the shock in scenario SCN-SR03-CHK-01 would travel through Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints’s coupled systems, step by step, under the assumptions the edition states.

StepWhat happensSource
01 CON to energyTransits through the strait fall by about 95 percent. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition SR-03, scenario SCN-SR03-CHK-01, step 1
02 Energy to tradeTanker rates, war-risk cover and bunker costs rise. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition SR-03, scenario SCN-SR03-CHK-01, step 2
03 Energy to foodFertiliser deliveries are delayed and prices rise. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition SR-03, scenario SCN-SR03-CHK-01, step 3
04 Trade to infrastructureShips stay on long routes, so capacity stays tight. Analogue or source: 2024.Edition SR-03, scenario SCN-SR03-CHK-01, step 4
05 Trade to financeImporters face higher bills; canal revenue stays low. Analogue or source: 2025.Edition SR-03, scenario SCN-SR03-CHK-01, step 5
06 Finance to developmentImport-dependent economies cut spending. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition SR-03, scenario SCN-SR03-CHK-01, step 6

A teaching model of a conditional scenario under the edition’s stated assumptions: not a forecast, not a prediction and not a warning. Sources: Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints 2026, scenario SCN-SR03-CHK-01 (2026); Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints 2026, references (NR-CIT-1) (2026).

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 5UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption deepens global economic strain across trade, prices and finance (second rapid assessment; transits about 130 a day in February and 6 in March 2026; merchandise trade growth 1.5 to 2.5 percent projected for 2026). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 46EIA (ed.), Short-Term Energy Outlook, September 2026, global oil markets (Brent averaged USD 91 a barrel in August 2026; Middle East crude oil production shut-ins from the Hormuz closure averaged 9.4 million barrels a day from March to June 2026 against February production of 25.2, and were 5.0 in July and 6.7 in August). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025, chapter I: International maritime trade (12,720 million tons and 66,781 billion ton-miles in 2024; Cape detour about 30 percent; cobalt and copper concentration). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Readings from the other desks

The global baseline is read through each steward’s lens, then once as a whole. Each lens is a projection of reviewed findings, not a separate argument. The other desks’ own editions of this subject are listed first, as cross-references, not copies.

16 min read0 figures8 tables36 notesNR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

6.1The other desks’ editions of this subject

Federation: each desk writes its own edition for the subjects in its remit. Until a desk releases, its edition shows its frame and the reading this edition printed for it.

DeskEditionStateIdentifier
GCRI Systems EvidenceNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
GRF Public DeliberationOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
GRA Capital ReadinessNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
Standards ProgressOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
Academy CapabilityOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
Index MeasurementOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit

6.2Three lenses

One edition, read by each steward. The lens of this site comes first.

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports reading trade as a network with narrow places. Common causes recur across routes, disruptions spread through shared straits, canals and processors, and recovery is limited by thresholds such as transit capacity and stocks. Evidence is strongest for single routes and weakest for exposure that crosses several.

INF-003 · CON-007 · MIN-010 · SYS-012

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people supply chain failure arrives as a higher price at the pump, on a food label or on a device. The baseline asks that public debate treat trade routes as shared and keep recovery, not only prevention, in view.

CON-006 · FOO-009 · FIN-008

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. Freight, insurance and fuel costs moved sharply, and projected canal revenue halved in one year1618. These show where finance-readiness evidence will matter. Nothing here is advice, a rating or an approval.

FIN-008 · FIN-011

NEXUS

Synthesis

Trade risk is well described route by route and thinly measured as a system. The 2027 programme should bind exposure data, test the compound chokepoint loss, and map recovery thresholds before the next closure.

SYS-012 · C-01 · C-03

6.3Standards, Academy and steward contributions

How the Nexus Standards drafts, the Risk Academy and the three stewards feed each quarterly edition for supply chains and chokepoints. The standards are a preparatory working draft (2026) and are cited as drafts, never as adopted standards.

Table 6.1The quarterly rhythm every edition follows
QuarterEditionQuestionBoundary
Q1State and AgendaWhat matters this year, and what is the starting position?observed baseline stays distinct from planned work
Q2Evidence and BuildWhat new evidence and capability exist?a configured capability is not a validated result
Q3Stress Test and ReadinessWhat do scenarios and tests show?simulated loss or performance is not observed impact
Q4Annual Synthesis and RenewalWhat changed in the year, and what renews?release follows review, not event publicity deadlines
Table 6.2Who contributes what each quarter
Steward or bodyRoleContribution route
GCRI CanadaLead Institution and Consortium Secretariat; publisher of record; technical truth (key T)science and practice communities · GCRI gateway
The Global Risks Forum (GRF)leadership, dialogue and the Universe programme; public meaning (key M)policy, Universe and national adoption · GRF gateway
The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)finance, insurance and development readiness; capital meaning (key F)finance and insurance · GRA gateway
Nexus Standardspreparatory drafts on vocabulary, hazards, indicators and methodsStandards site · working groups HAZ, IND, MTH, FIN, AI
Risk Academylearning pathways tied to the agenda questionsAcademy gateway · learning by review
Reports strategic deskssupply chain chapter inputs: GCRI evidence and GRA readinessstrategic editorial board

Standards drafts used in this edition

  • Risk vocabulary NRS-C1 (424 terms) for terms in the glossary
  • Hazard atlas NHS-1 1.1.0 (905 hazards in 120 families) for risk objects
  • Seven risk classes: global, catastrophic, existential, emerging, planetary, exponential, frontier-tech

Standards calendar to watch

  • Founding calls from 20 October 2026; working groups meet from 5 November 2026
  • Inaugural Global Standards Council session, 12 January 2027
  • Quarterly reviews in March, June, September and December, aligned with each edition

6.4GCRI reading: the model card

GCRI’s reading of this edition is its model card: what the national model is, what it computes and where it stops. It is printed in full in Annex A, with the methods it belongs to. Annex A, methodology

6.5Global Risks Forum reading: editorial essays

Four signed essays by the Reports editorial team set out the positions this edition takes. They are interpretation, labelled as such; the evidence they draw on is in the findings register.

Ships carry most of the world’s goods, and a few straits, canals and processing hubs decide cost and time. Reading each route alone understates how a fault in one becomes a fault in many. This edition reads the network.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 01

Trade is a network with narrow places

Distance-adjusted trade grew 5.9 percent in 2024 against 2.2 percent for volume. UNCTAD reads the gap as fragility and inefficiency, not as strength. A route that works only by taking a longer way is a cost, not a buffer.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 02

Rerouting is not resilience

A closure at Hormuz shut in oil production and cut fertiliser flows together. The fertiliser effect arrives later, at planting, and cannot be rescheduled without yield loss. This is why the baseline treats trade and food as one system.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 03

Energy and food share a strait

WTO data show world merchandise volume up 4.6 percent in 2025, while Middle East export volumes fell 9.7 percent year on year in the first quarter of 2026. A healthy total can hide a severe regional loss.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 04

Aggregate trade can hold while parts fail

6.6Global Risks Alliance reading: 2027 supply chains and chokepoints readiness pack

The registers that open the 2027 global cycle. At baseline each is initialised from this edition.

Table 6.32027 supply chains and chokepoints readiness pack
ItemRegisterState at baselineFirst 2027 entry
E1Global risk state deltabaseline set by this editionchanges against the baseline
E2WEFH+B state deltafive global system readings setindicator updates and freshness
E3Agenda and Portfolio movementeight agenda items · 6 proposed objectsadmission decisions
E4Federation delivery registernational chapters in preparationnational chapters
E5Consortium capability registernational consortia formingfirst contributions
E6Leadership questions and challengesnone yetfirst challenge log
E7Foundry technical statenational environments preparedfirst federation cut
E8Publication candidatestwelve findings carried forwardPUBLISH · HOLD dispositions
E9Universe readinessone candidate missionadmission and role spine
E10Correction registernonefirst federation-wide cycle

Publication dispositions

  • Publish
  • Hold
  • Needs evidence
  • Restricted
  • Superseded

6.7Nexus Standards reading: standards and regulatory watch

Instruments and published guidance that shape the systems in this edition, by status on the retrieval date. The edition assesses no one’s compliance.

  • IN FORCE
  • ADOPTED
  • PUBLISHED · GUIDANCE
  • PUBLISHED · VOLUNTARY
Table 6.4Standards and regulatory watch
InstrumentBodyScopeStatusRelevance
UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, straits regime29United NationsglobalIN FORCEtransit passage
Montreux Convention30signatory statesTurkish StraitsIN FORCEstraits passage
Constantinople Convention31signatory statesSuez CanalIN FORCEcanal passage
Panama Canal treaties32Panama and the United StatesPanamaIN FORCEcanal neutrality
ISPS Code, SOLAS chapter XI-224IMOglobalIN FORCEship and port security
Trade Facilitation Agreement25WTOglobalIN FORCEcustoms and transit
ISO 28000:2022 supply chain security33ISOglobalPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYsecurity management
ISO 31000:2018 risk management34ISOglobalPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYrisk process
Critical Raw Materials Act35European UnionEUIN FORCEstrategic raw materials
Chips Act36European UnionEUIN FORCEchip supply
SAFE Framework of Standards37World Customs OrganizationglobalPUBLISHED · GUIDANCEsecure and facilitated trade

Changed since 2024

  • The WTO set its March 2026 baseline for 2026 merchandise volume growth at 1.9 percent13
  • China’s suspension of its October 2025 rare earth controls runs to 10 November 202622
  • The US and several trading partners announced port fees on certain foreign-built or foreign-operated vessels in 2025245

To watch in 2027

  • Extension or lapse of the rare earth control suspension22
  • Rules on passage and security in straits after the 2026 closure2924
  • Port-fee measures on vessels and their effect on freight245

6.8Risk Academy reading: literature and evidence review, science and assessments

The review behind this edition covers supply chains and chokepoints assessments, peer-reviewed science and the institutional reports that bind its findings. Systematic reviews for each agenda item begin in 2027.

Review protocol

Question
What does the published evidence establish about the world’s supply chains, trade routes and chokepoints and its couplings?
Sources searched
agency and organisation reports; chokepoint flow statistics; freight indices; peer-reviewed supply network literature
Window
releases available at evidence close, 30 September 2026
Selection
sources that bind or contextualise a finding in this edition
Next step
systematic reviews for agenda items 01 to 05 in 2027
Table 6.5Peer-reviewed science and assessments
ReferenceTypeYearRoleUsed for
Acemoglu et al.38journal article2012frameworknetwork origins of fluctuations
Carvalho et al.39journal article2021supportssupply chain disruption after an earthquake
Barrot and Sauvagnat40journal article2016supportsinput specificity and shock propagation
Baldwin and Freeman41journal article2022frameworkrisks and global supply chains
Benigno et al.42working paper2022frameworksupply chain pressure measurement
Rodrigue43book2020frameworktransport geography
Table 6.6Institutional flagships
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Review of Maritime Transport 20251UNCTAD2025supportsvolume and ton-miles
Review of Maritime Transport 20244UNCTAD2024supportscanal shares
Hormuz rapid assessment5UNCTAD2026supportstransit drop
World Trade Report 202615WTO2026supportsMFN share
Global Trade Outlook and Statistics13WTO2026supportstrade forecast
Director-General remarks17FAO2026supportsfertiliser and food
Table 6.7Statistics, flows and freight
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
World Oil Transit Chokepoints7EIA2026supportschokepoint oil flows
Short-Term Energy Outlook, September 202646EIA2026supportsHormuz-related oil shut-ins
Panama Canal fiscal year 202510Panama Canal Authority2025supportscanal transits
World Container Index16Drewry2026supportscontainer freight
IMF fourth review as reported18IMF2025contextSuez revenue
Global Critical Minerals Outlook 202626IEA2026contextmineral concentration
Mineral Commodity Summaries 202627USGS2026contextrare earth production
Semiconductor supply chain study28SIA and BCG2021contextchip manufacturing location
Table 6.8Treaties, standards and regulations
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, straits29United Nations1982contexttransit passage
Montreux Convention30signatory states1936contextTurkish Straits
Constantinople Convention31signatory states1888contextSuez Canal
Panama Canal treaties32Panama and the United States1977contextcanal neutrality
ISPS Code24IMO2004supportsship and port security
Trade Facilitation Agreement25WTO2017supportscustoms and transit
ISO 2800033ISO2022contextsupply chain security management

Where the evidence agrees

  • Distance-adjusted trade grew faster than volume in 2024 because of rerouting1
  • A few straits and canals carry a large share of oil and container trade47
  • Fertiliser and energy flows are linked through the same strait617

Where it is unsettled

  • How long a closed strait stays closed, and how fast flows return46
  • How far the Middle East conflict and energy prices hold 2026 trade growth below the March baseline13
  • How far export licences on processed minerals reach downstream makers2223

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 16POST-CLOSE, context only: Drewry (ed.), World Container Index (assessment of 29 October 2026; composite USD 4,429 per 40ft; Shanghai to Los Angeles USD 7,514; Shanghai to Rotterdam USD 3,686; two vessels transiting Hormuz and 62 vessels through Suez in the previous week). Drewry Shipping Consultants, London. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 18IMF (ed.), fourth review of Egypt’s arrangement (Suez Canal revenue USD 6.6 billion in FY2023/24 and projected USD 3.6 billion in FY2024/25), as reported by Hellenic Shipping News from Arab Finance; the IMF report itself was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 29UNVERIFIED, not opened: United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982), regime of transit passage through straits used for international navigation, cited from memory. United Nations, New York. Observation year 1982. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: Convention regarding the Regime of the Straits (Montreux Convention), 1936, cited from memory. Observation year 1936. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: Convention respecting the Free Navigation of the Suez Maritime Canal (Constantinople Convention), 1888, cited from memory. Observation year 1888. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 32UNVERIFIED, not opened: Treaty concerning the Permanent Neutrality and Operation of the Panama Canal, 1977, cited from memory. Observation year 1977. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 24IMO (ed.), SOLAS chapter XI-2 and the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (web page; mandatory Part A and guidance Part B; in force 1 July 2004). International Maritime Organization, London. Observation year 2004. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 25WTO (ed.), Trade Facilitation Agreement (web page; Bali Ministerial Conference 2013; in force 22 February 2017). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO 28000:2022, Security and resilience: security management systems for the supply chain. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 34UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO 31000:2018, Risk management: guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials (Critical Raw Materials Act), Official Journal of the European Union, 2024, cited from memory; the EUR-Lex request returned no text. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: Regulation (EU) 2023/1781 establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s semiconductor ecosystem (Chips Act), Official Journal of the European Union, 2023, cited from memory. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 37UNVERIFIED, not opened: World Customs Organization (ed.), SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade, cited from memory. World Customs Organization, Brussels. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 13WTO (ed.), Global Trade Outlook and Statistics, news release of 19 March 2026 (2025 merchandise volume growth 4.6 percent; 2026 baseline 1.9 percent; high-energy-price case 1.4 percent; Hormuz traffic from 138 vessels a day to almost zero). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 22China Briefing (ed.), How will China’s rare earth export controls impact industries and businesses? (April 2025 controls on seven elements; 9 October 2025 expansion to five more; suspended until 10 November 2026). Dezan Shira and Associates, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 2UNCTAD (ed.), Stormy seas for global shipping: UNCTAD warns of uncertainty, volatility and rising costs (press release of 24 September 2025; 2025 volume growth 0.5 percent; port fees on certain vessels; alternative-fuel share 8 percent). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 45UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Trade Representative, Section 301 action on China’s targeted maritime, logistics and shipbuilding sectors, 2025 (port fees on certain vessels); the page returned an error and the measure is known here only from the UNCTAD press release cited as reference 2. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: Acemoglu, D., Carvalho, V.M., Ozdaglar, A. and Tahbaz-Salehi, A., The network origins of aggregate fluctuations, Econometrica 80(5), 1977 to 2016, 2012, cited from memory. Observation year 2012. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Carvalho, V.M., Nirei, M., Saito, Y.U. and Tahbaz-Salehi, A., Supply chain disruptions: evidence from the Great East Japan Earthquake, Quarterly Journal of Economics 136(2), 1255 to 1321, 2021, cited from memory. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: Barrot, J.-N. and Sauvagnat, J., Input specificity and the propagation of idiosyncratic shocks in production networks, Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(3), 1543 to 1592, 2016, cited from memory. Observation year 2016. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: Baldwin, R. and Freeman, R., Risks and global supply chains: what we know and what we need to know, Annual Review of Economics 14, 153 to 180, 2022, cited from memory. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 42UNVERIFIED, not opened: Benigno, G., di Giovanni, J., Groen, J.J.J. and Noble, A.I., The Global Supply Chain Pressure Index: a new tool to measure supply chain disruptions, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 2022, cited from memory; the index page returned no definition. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 43UNVERIFIED, not opened: Rodrigue, J.-P., The Geography of Transport Systems, 5th edition. Routledge, New York, 2020, cited from memory. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  24. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025, chapter I: International maritime trade (12,720 million tons and 66,781 billion ton-miles in 2024; Cape detour about 30 percent; cobalt and copper concentration). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  25. 4UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2024, chapter II: World shipping fleet and services (Suez Canal about 10 percent of maritime trade volume and 22 percent of container trade; Panama Canal about 3 percent). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  26. 5UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption deepens global economic strain across trade, prices and finance (second rapid assessment; transits about 130 a day in February and 6 in March 2026; merchandise trade growth 1.5 to 2.5 percent projected for 2026). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  27. 15WTO (ed.), World Trade Report 2026: A critical juncture for the world trading system (about 72 percent of merchandise trade on MFN terms). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  28. 17FAO (ed.), Strait of Hormuz crisis: FAO Director-General outlines risks, actions and policy responses (remarks to the 180th Council session, 28 April 2026; urea up 52 percent in the United States and 60 percent in Brazil by mid-April). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  29. 7EIA (ed.), World Oil Transit Chokepoints (last updated 3 March 2026; 2024 total oil flows: Hormuz 20.7, Malacca 22.5, Suez and SUMED 4.8, Bab el-Mandeb 4.1, Cape of Good Hope 9.3 million barrels a day). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  30. 46EIA (ed.), Short-Term Energy Outlook, September 2026, global oil markets (Brent averaged USD 91 a barrel in August 2026; Middle East crude oil production shut-ins from the Hormuz closure averaged 9.4 million barrels a day from March to June 2026 against February production of 25.2, and were 5.0 in July and 6.7 in August). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  31. 10Panama Canal Authority (ed.), Panama Canal maintains operational and financial strength (press release of 8 October 2025; fiscal year 2025: 13,404 transits and 489.1 million CP/SUAB tons; preliminary and unaudited). Autoridad del Canal de Panama, Panama City. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  32. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (July 2026), taken only from the press article cited as reference 23; the IEA page returned an access error. International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  33. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, rare earths chapter; the publication returned an access error and no figure is used. US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  34. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: Semiconductor Industry Association and Boston Consulting Group, Strengthening the Global Semiconductor Supply Chain in an Uncertain Era, 2021, taken from search-result summaries that disagree on the Taiwan share; no figure is used in findings. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  35. 6UNCTAD (ed.), initial assessment of the Strait of Hormuz disruption of 10 March 2026 (about one third of global seaborne fertiliser trade, about 16 million tonnes), as reported by a Pakistani daily newspaper; the UNCTAD text itself was not opened. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  36. 23Investment Monitor (ed.), China rare earth curbs put USD 6.5 trillion of output at risk, article of 16 July 2026 reporting the IEA Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (about 85 percent top-country rare earth refining share in 2025; investment down 9 percent in 2025); the IEA report itself was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

The 2027 agenda

Eight bounded questions open the 2027 supply chains and chokepoints agenda. Each comes from a baseline finding, names the initiative that will carry it and the first output due in the 2027 supply chains and chokepoints edition.

5 min read0 figures6 tables3 notesNR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

7.1Questions for the operational series

  1. C-01

    How would a chokepoint closure that overlaps a Red Sea diversion and high freight rates spread through energy, fertiliser, food and manufacturing at the same time?

    INI-SR03-CHK-01 · compound chokepoint loss; first output: dependency analysis for six regions.

  2. C-02

    Which goods pass through two or more chokepoints on their way to market?

    INI-SR03-EXP-02 · multi-chokepoint exposure; first output: exposure register.

  3. C-03

    How long do flows take to return after a closure, and what limits recovery?

    INI-SR03-RCV-03 · recovery times; first output: recovery table.

  4. C-04

    Where are energy and fertiliser buffers thinnest?

    INI-SR03-BUF-04 · buffers and stocks; first output: buffer map.

  5. C-05

    How do export controls on processed minerals reach downstream manufacturing?

    INI-SR03-CTL-05 · controls and processing; first output: control and processing overlay.

  6. C-06

    Which ports and corridors publish throughput on a comparable basis?

    To be admitted in 2027; first output: coverage note.

  7. C-07

    How do war-risk costs and insurance change route choice?

    To be admitted in 2027; first output: scoping note.

  8. C-08

    Which supply chain capabilities have been tested in real disruptions, and which are only planned?

    Supply chain capability register; first output: rung evidence for 15 functions.

7.2Portfolio proposed for the Q1 2027 alignment

Five initiatives and one Universe mission candidate are proposed for the 2027 supply chains portfolio. They are programme objects: no partner, funder or member is attached to them in this edition.

Table 7.1Objects proposed for the first operational quarter
IDObjectKindQuestionState
INI-SR03-CHK-01Compound chokepoint lossInitiativeC-01PROPOSED
INI-SR03-EXP-02Multi-chokepoint exposureInitiativeC-02PROPOSED
INI-SR03-RCV-03Recovery timesInitiativeC-03PROPOSED
INI-SR03-BUF-04Buffers and stocksInitiativeC-04PROPOSED
INI-SR03-CTL-05Controls and processingInitiativeC-05PROPOSED
MSN-SR03-2027-01Chokepoint closure Universe missionMissionC-01Candidate

7.3The pathway

The supply chains edition reads national trade chapters, sector editions and the global edition through one governed evidence graph. At baseline the federation is designed and its first editions are drafted. This page states what exists today and what comes next.

  1. 01

    National trade chapters

    trade and logistics reading in each national edition

    IN PREPARATION · national baselines

  2. 02

    Sector editions

    energy, food, infrastructure and transport, finance

    PLANNED · sector Baseline Editions

  3. 03

    Supply chains model

    the global supply system of systems

    v0 SPECIFIED · v1 with federation evidence

  4. 04

    Strategic links

    SR-02 lifeline systems · SR-04 critical minerals · SR-10 digital public infrastructure

    PLANNED · strategic baselines

  5. 05

    Universe

    annual proving environment

    CANDIDATE MISSION · mandate in 2027

  6. 06

    Supply Chains Report

    this series

    BASELINE DRAFT · 2027 annual edition

  7. 07

    Evidence and correction

    one graph, many projections

    OPEN · first correction cycle in 2027

7.4Universe 2027: evidence pack for the supply chains and chokepoints candidate mission

  1. 01

    Mandate

  2. 02

    Core Build · 1 month

  3. 03

    Action · 1 week

  4. 04

    Evidence seal

  5. 05

    Portfolio correction

  6. 06

    Next mandate

Table 7.2Universe 2027: evidence pack for the supply chains and chokepoints candidate mission
ItemRecordStateTiming
F1Annual mandate recordPLANNEDafter the Q2 2027 alignment
F2Core Build recordPLANNEDone month before the exercise
F3Exercise evidencePLANNEDduring the Action week
F4Decision packetsPLANNEDexercise state only
F5Proof receiptsPLANNEDscoped to each recorded check
F6After-action reportPLANNEDwithin one quarter
F7Upgrade docketPLANNEDrouted to the Portfolio
F8Portfolio renewalPLANNED2027 supply chains and chokepoints annual edition
F9Public synthesisPLANNEDpublic-safe extracts only

Mission

ID
MSN-SR03-2027-01 · Chokepoint closure Universe mission
Role spine
Leadership sponsor · Institutional anchor · Mission lead: drawn from national pathways
Receiving actors
to be identified with the mandate

7.5Handoffs and routing

Where the baseline’s findings go next. A handoff routes a finding for awareness, review or work; it transfers no authority.

Table 7.3Handoffs and routing
FindingRouted toPurposeClass
TRD-001 · seaborne volumeINI-SR03-EXP-02multi-chokepoint exposurePUBLIC
INF-003 · canal sharesINI-SR03-EXP-02multi-chokepoint exposurePUBLIC
ENE-005 · Hormuz baselinesector editionsenergy flow overlayPUBLIC
CON-006 · Hormuz flowsINI-SR03-RCV-03recovery timesPUBLIC
FOO-009 · fertiliserINI-SR03-BUF-04buffers and stocksPUBLIC
MIN-010 · rare earth controlsINI-SR03-CTL-05controls and processingPUBLIC
FIN-008 · trade outlookINI-SR03-RCV-03 · key F reviewrecovery timesPUBLIC
SYS-012 · compound pathwayMSN-SR03-2027-01Universe candidateCONSORTIUM
Table 7.4Routing rules by publication class
ClassWhere it goesWho can see it
PUBLICthe published edition and its evidence bundleanyone
CONSORTIUMgoverned rooms of the federationconsortium members under agreement
CONTROLLEDneed-to-know channelsnamed competent actors only

7.6Feeds and signal register

Table 7.5Feeds watched from 2027
FeedProducerLatencyFeeds into
Chokepoint oil and LNG flowsEIAquarterlyENE-005
Vessel transits at straits and canalsIMF PortWatch and industry trackersdaily to weeklyCON-007
Maritime trade statisticsUNCTADannualTRD-001
Trade forecasts and statisticsWTOtwice a yearFIN-008
Container freight indexDrewryweeklyINF-004
Canal traffic and revenuePanama Canal Authority and Suez Canal AuthorityannualINF-004
Food and fertiliser monitoringFAOper eventFOO-009

Escalation routes

  • none · keep monitoring
  • research question
  • project
  • risk object
  • annual publication
  • signal report
Table 7.6Signals at baseline
IDSignalCorroborationSystemsRoute
SIG-SR03-001Hormuz transit drop in March 20265CORROBORATEDCON · ENErisk object RSK-SR03-CON-001
SIG-SR03-002Red Sea rerouting and the Cape detour1CORROBORATEDINF · TRDrisk object RSK-SR03-INF-002
SIG-SR03-003Rare earth control suspension to 10 November 202622PARTIALMIN · TRDresearch question C-05

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 5UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption deepens global economic strain across trade, prices and finance (second rapid assessment; transits about 130 a day in February and 6 in March 2026; merchandise trade growth 1.5 to 2.5 percent projected for 2026). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025, chapter I: International maritime trade (12,720 million tons and 66,781 billion ton-miles in 2024; Cape detour about 30 percent; cobalt and copper concentration). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 22China Briefing (ed.), How will China’s rare earth export controls impact industries and businesses? (April 2025 controls on seven elements; 9 October 2025 expansion to five more; suspended until 10 November 2026). Dezan Shira and Associates, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Systems in depth

One section per system: its state at evidence close, its exposures and what the operational series will watch.

8 min read0 figures5 tables15 notesNR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

8.1Common causes

One cause can strike many routes at once: a war, attacks on vessels, low water levels or a licence rule. The shared cause matters more than the route.

≈130 to 6vessels a day

Hormuz transits, February to March 20265

5.9%

ton-mile growth in 2024 from rerouting1

72%

of merchandise trade on MFN terms15

Table 8.1Evidence at baseline
InstanceMechanism in actionEvidenceStatus
ConflictHormuz transits fell by about 95 percent in March 20265Reported
Attacks on shippingRed Sea rerouting lifted ton-miles in 20241Reported
Water levelsPanama Canal transit restrictions until mid-202414Reported
Trade controlslicences on seven rare earth elements remain in force22Reported

Pathways in this mechanism

  • CON → TRD conflict
  • INF → TRD attacks on vessels
  • MIN → TRD controls

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • common cause tagging of disruptions
  • frequency of concurrent causes

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • SR-02 Critical Infrastructure and Lifeline Systems
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • SR-10 Digital Public Infrastructure and Systemic Cyber Risk
  • GS-02 Energy
  • GS-09 Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics

8.2Domino effects

A failure on one route removes an input from the next. A closed strait raises fuel and freight costs, then fertiliser costs, then food costs.

9.4million b/d

Middle East crude oil shut-ins, March to June 2026 average46

6.7million b/d

shut-ins in August 202646

≈16million tonnes

seaborne fertiliser normally through Hormuz6

Table 8.2Evidence at baseline
InstanceMechanism in actionEvidenceStatus
Strait to energycrude oil shut-ins averaged about 37 percent of February production from March to June 202646Reported
Energy to fertiliserurea prices rose 52 percent in the US and 60 percent in Brazil by mid-April 202617Reported
Fertiliser to foodapplications cannot be rescheduled without yield loss17Reported
Freight to budgetsSuez revenue projected to halve in FY2024/2518Reported

Pathways in this mechanism

  • ENE → FOO
  • TRD → FIN
  • FIN → DEV

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • sequence timing of price effects
  • importer stock levels

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • SR-02 Critical Infrastructure and Lifeline Systems
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • SR-10 Digital Public Infrastructure and Systemic Cyber Risk
  • GS-02 Energy
  • GS-09 Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics

8.3Inter-systemic feedbacks

Trade also depends on what it carries. Rerouting absorbs ship capacity and lifts rates, and energy prices feed back into trade growth.

4.6%

merchandise volume growth, 202513

11%

added to container TEU-mile demand by Cape routing1

1.4%

March high-energy-price case, 202613

Table 8.3Evidence at baseline
InstanceMechanism in actionEvidenceStatus
Rerouting to capacitylonger voyages absorb ship capacity and lift distance-adjusted demand1Reported
Unwinding to demanda return to shorter routes would ease costs but cut ton-mile demand1Reported
Oil shut-ins to pricesBrent crude averaged USD 91 a barrel in August 2026 as Middle East exports stayed constrained46Reported
Energy prices to tradesustained high energy prices cut 2026 growth to 1.4 percent in the March case13Reported

Pathways in this mechanism

  • TRD ↔ INF
  • AIC → TRD
  • ENE → TRD

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • capacity response to a return of Suez traffic
  • depth of AI-goods concentration

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • SR-02 Critical Infrastructure and Lifeline Systems
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • SR-10 Digital Public Infrastructure and Systemic Cyber Risk
  • GS-02 Energy
  • GS-09 Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics

8.4Shared vulnerabilities

Different goods share the same weak points: a few straits and canals, concentrated processing and a small set of export origins.

22.5million b/d

oil through the Strait of Malacca, 20247

≈85%

top-country share of rare earth refining, 202523

88%

cobalt seaborne trade from the top five exporters, 20231

Table 8.4Evidence at baseline
InstanceMechanism in actionEvidenceStatus
Straits and canalsMalacca 22.5 and Hormuz 20.7 million barrels a day of oil in 20247Reported
Mineral processingone country held about 85 percent of rare earth refining in 202523Reported
Export originsthe Democratic Republic of the Congo supplied over 80 percent of cobalt exports1Reported
Chip manufacturinglocation of leading-edge capacity; figures not reconciled28Expert input

Pathways in this mechanism

  • INF → TRD straits
  • MIN → AIC processing
  • MIN → TRD controls

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • share of trade through two or more chokepoints
  • processing capacity outside the top refiner

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • SR-02 Critical Infrastructure and Lifeline Systems
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • SR-10 Digital Public Infrastructure and Systemic Cyber Risk
  • GS-02 Energy
  • GS-09 Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics

8.5Thresholds and tipping

A system can absorb stress until a threshold is crossed. Transit capacity, stocks and licence expiry dates are such thresholds for trade.

1.4%

2026 trade growth in the March high-energy-price case13

10November 2026

end of the rare earth control suspension22

≈800ships

Lloyd’s List estimate of vessels stuck in the Gulf, April 202620

Table 8.5Evidence at baseline
InstanceMechanism in actionEvidenceStatus
Canal capacityPanama recovered to 13,404 transits in FY2025 after the drought year10Reported
Energy price thresholdthe March case cut 2026 growth by 0.5 points to 1.4 percent13Reported
Licence expirysuspension runs to 10 November 202622Reported
Vessels strandedan estimated 800 ships in the Gulf in April20Reported

Pathways in this mechanism

  • INF → TRD capacity
  • ENE → FIN prices
  • MIN → TRD expiry

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • recovery times after a closure
  • stock thresholds for fertiliser and fuel

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • SR-02 Critical Infrastructure and Lifeline Systems
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • SR-10 Digital Public Infrastructure and Systemic Cyber Risk
  • GS-02 Energy
  • GS-09 Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 5UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption deepens global economic strain across trade, prices and finance (second rapid assessment; transits about 130 a day in February and 6 in March 2026; merchandise trade growth 1.5 to 2.5 percent projected for 2026). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025, chapter I: International maritime trade (12,720 million tons and 66,781 billion ton-miles in 2024; Cape detour about 30 percent; cobalt and copper concentration). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 15WTO (ed.), World Trade Report 2026: A critical juncture for the world trading system (about 72 percent of merchandise trade on MFN terms). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 4UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2024, chapter II: World shipping fleet and services (Suez Canal about 10 percent of maritime trade volume and 22 percent of container trade; Panama Canal about 3 percent). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 22China Briefing (ed.), How will China’s rare earth export controls impact industries and businesses? (April 2025 controls on seven elements; 9 October 2025 expansion to five more; suspended until 10 November 2026). Dezan Shira and Associates, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 46EIA (ed.), Short-Term Energy Outlook, September 2026, global oil markets (Brent averaged USD 91 a barrel in August 2026; Middle East crude oil production shut-ins from the Hormuz closure averaged 9.4 million barrels a day from March to June 2026 against February production of 25.2, and were 5.0 in July and 6.7 in August). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 6UNCTAD (ed.), initial assessment of the Strait of Hormuz disruption of 10 March 2026 (about one third of global seaborne fertiliser trade, about 16 million tonnes), as reported by a Pakistani daily newspaper; the UNCTAD text itself was not opened. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 17FAO (ed.), Strait of Hormuz crisis: FAO Director-General outlines risks, actions and policy responses (remarks to the 180th Council session, 28 April 2026; urea up 52 percent in the United States and 60 percent in Brazil by mid-April). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 18IMF (ed.), fourth review of Egypt’s arrangement (Suez Canal revenue USD 6.6 billion in FY2023/24 and projected USD 3.6 billion in FY2024/25), as reported by Hellenic Shipping News from Arab Finance; the IMF report itself was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 13WTO (ed.), Global Trade Outlook and Statistics, news release of 19 March 2026 (2025 merchandise volume growth 4.6 percent; 2026 baseline 1.9 percent; high-energy-price case 1.4 percent; Hormuz traffic from 138 vessels a day to almost zero). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 7EIA (ed.), World Oil Transit Chokepoints (last updated 3 March 2026; 2024 total oil flows: Hormuz 20.7, Malacca 22.5, Suez and SUMED 4.8, Bab el-Mandeb 4.1, Cape of Good Hope 9.3 million barrels a day). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 23Investment Monitor (ed.), China rare earth curbs put USD 6.5 trillion of output at risk, article of 16 July 2026 reporting the IEA Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (about 85 percent top-country rare earth refining share in 2025; investment down 9 percent in 2025); the IEA report itself was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: Semiconductor Industry Association and Boston Consulting Group, Strengthening the Global Semiconductor Supply Chain in an Uncertain Era, 2021, taken from search-result summaries that disagree on the Taiwan share; no figure is used in findings. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 20News report, Facts about the Strait of Hormuz since its negotiated reopening (last updated 8 April 2026; Kpler: average of eight commodity carriers a day from 1 March to 7 April; Lloyd’s List estimate of about 800 ships stuck in the Gulf; two-week ceasefire). Arab News Pakistan, Islamabad. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 10Panama Canal Authority (ed.), Panama Canal maintains operational and financial strength (press release of 8 October 2025; fiscal year 2025: 13,404 transits and 489.1 million CP/SUAB tons; preliminary and unaudited). Autoridad del Canal de Panama, Panama City. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Methodology

How the edition was made: methods, the model card, the evidence cut and its age, the acceptance record and the glossary.

12 min read0 figures13 tables10 notesNR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

A.1Methods

The global baseline uses published values and four simple derivations. Each is shown in full so that any reader can reproduce it.

Table A.1Methods
No.DerivationCalculationResult
(1)Average seaborne haul in 2024, derived from ton-miles and tons66,781 billion ton-miles ÷ 12,720 million tons≈ 5,250 miles
(2)Share of February 2026 Middle East crude oil production shut in, March to June 2026 average9.4 ÷ 25.2≈ 37%
(3)Fall in Hormuz daily transits, February to March 2026(130 − 6) ÷ 130≈ 95%
(4)Ratio of Shanghai to Los Angeles and Shanghai to Rotterdam container rates, 29 October 20267,514 ÷ 3,686≈ 2.0
Table A.2Coupling strength scale (matrix and model card)
StrengthDefinition
STRONGa disruption in the source system has historically changed the target system’s service or output within one season, in more than one region
MODERATEan effect is documented but buffered or slower
WEAKan effect is plausible but not documented at global scale
Table A.3Status grammar
LabelRule
Reportedvalue as issued by its source, with year
Inferredreasoned from cited evidence; never a measurement
EstimatedNexus analytical value with stated method
Scenarioconditional on stated assumptions
Expert inputstructured editorial judgement awaiting evidence

A.2Model card, Supply Chains and Chokepoints Model v0

Model ID
MDL-SR03-SUPPLYCHAINS · v0.1
Purpose
represent trade as a network with narrow places and the mechanisms by which disruptions spread between shipping lanes, energy, fertiliser, minerals and freight
Family
graph-based system of systems
Inputs
the cited sources of this edition; no proprietary data
Method
expert-specified coupling strengths (STRONG · MODERATE · WEAK) from assessments and analogue events
Validation
none yet, first validation against federation evidence in 2027
Uncertainty
qualitative; strengths are hypotheses, not measurements
Domain of validity
global scale; not for asset-, site- or country-level use
Reproducibility
strength table and sources published in this edition
20couplings

typed in v0

2strong

documented within one season

4moderate

documented, buffered

14weak

plausible, undocumented

A.3The baseline evidence cut

Every Nexus edition is published from a frozen evidence cut. The global baseline cut is documentary: it pins the exact edition of every source cited. Federation cuts begin with the first national Foundry cuts in 2027.

Cut ID
DC-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Type
baseline documentary cut
Resolution policy
pinned · as of 30 September 2026
Sources pinned
46 cited sources, each at the edition and access date in the references
Model runs
none at baseline, analytical values are stated with their method
Digest
computed at freeze and recorded in the publication record
Supersedes
nothing, first cut of the series
Superseded by
the 2027 supply chains and chokepoints annual cut

Lineage

  1. 01

    source edition

  2. 02

    pinned citation

  3. 03

    finding

  4. 04

    page

  5. 05

    publication record

Table A.4From the baseline cut to the federation cut
ElementBaseline 20262027 global annual
Sourcescited global publications, pinned by editionnational, regional and sector cuts through one graph
Analysisstated methods and editorial estimatestyped analysis specifications
ModelsSupply Chains and Chokepoints Model v0 specificationmodel runs with receipts
Findingstwelve baseline findingsfindings re-bound to federation evidence
Reviewfive passes scheduledfive passes on the exact digest

A.4Evidence age and coverage

A 2026 global edition rests on evidence observed in many different years. This page shows each time base, so that no single year label hides older evidence.

Table A.5Evidence age and coverage
IndicatorObservedReleasedCadenceNext release
Seaborne trade volume and ton-miles2024Sep 2025annualReview of Maritime Transport 2026
Canal shares of trade2023 to 20242024annualnext UNCTAD review
Chokepoint oil flows2024Mar 2026annualnext EIA update
Hormuz quarterly flows4Q25 to 2Q26Oct 2026monthly10 Nov 2026
Hormuz daily transitsFeb to Mar 2026Mar to Apr 2026per eventnot found after Q2 2026
Panama Canal trafficFY2025Oct 2025annualFY2026 results
WTO trade outlook2026Oct 2026twice a yearspring 2027
Container freight29 Oct 2026Oct 2026weeklyweekly
Fertiliser and food2026Apr 2026per eventnot found
Rare earth controls2025Nov 2025per event10 Nov 2026
Table A.6Coverage by system at baseline
SystemCoverageThinnest dimension
Seaborne volumeGOODport and inland legs
Canals and straitsPARTIALtransits after Q2 2026
Energy flowsGOODHormuz data reliability
Fertiliser and foodPARTIALimporter stocks
MineralsTHINprocessing outside the top refiner
Container freightPARTIALlong-run series
Trade policyPARTIALeffective tariffs on one basis
Air, rail and roadTHINnot covered
Table A.7Designed empty states: what is not bound, what would fill it and why
FieldSource that would fill itBlocker
Port-level and inland-leg throughput on a common basisport authorities, customs and national statistics officesnot published on a common basis; port data not retrieved
Strait of Hormuz transits and flows after the second quarter of 2026EIA, UNCTAD and vessel-tracking providers465tracking data unreliable since late February 2026; only the Drewry note of two transits in the week to 29 October was found
Effective tariff rates on one basis across major economiesnational tariff schedules and WTO tariff datathe Yale Budget Lab tracker could not be retrieved; no figure is used
Share of trade that passes through two or more chokepointscustoms and route datano consolidated series found
Inventory buffers held by firms and statesfirms, national statistics and strategic stock agenciesnot published on a common basis
Taiwan share of leading-edge chip manufacturingSIA and BCG supply chain study28report not opened; search summaries give 92 percent of sub-10 nm capacity and 69 percent of 2022 production, and the two are not reconciled
IEA critical minerals outlook figures from the report itselfIEA Global Critical Minerals Outlook 202626the report page returned an access error; figures come from a press article
USGS rare earth production by countryUSGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 202627the publication returned an access error
IMF PortWatch chokepoint seriesIMF PortWatch44the dashboard page returned no readable content
IMF Suez Canal revenue projection from the review itselfIMF fourth review18only a news report on the review was opened
Status of the rare earth control suspension after 10 November 2026Ministry of Commerce noticesthe date falls after evidence close; no extension notice found
Capability rungs beyond rerouting and canal recoverycarriers, ports, regulators, ministriesnot reviewed

A.5Evidence cards, two anchor sources

Issued by the UN Trade and Development body. Annual. Role: binds TRD-001 and INF-002. Coverage: global seaborne trade, 2024 with projections to 2030. The chapter text was read in full.

EVD-SR03-001

UNCTAD Review of Maritime Transport 2025, chapter I1

Issued by the World Trade Organization. Twice a year. Role: binds FIN-008. Coverage: global merchandise trade, 2025 growth and the 2026 baseline and high-energy-price case. The news release was read; the full report was not.

EVD-SR03-002

WTO Global Trade Outlook and Statistics, March 202613

Table A.8Quality dimensions at baseline
DimensionEVD-SR03-001EVD-SR03-002
Completenessvolume, ton-miles, containers, commoditiesmerchandise and services, regions and sectors
Timelinessabout 9 months after the yearabout 1 week after the data cut
Revisionannual; prior years restatedforecasts revised in March, October and in between
Method transparencysources named; data from commercial shipping databasesforecast method described by the issuer
External validationcompiled from industry and port datareview by the issuer’s statistics staff

Evidence cards to follow in 2027

  • UNCTAD1: chapters II to V on fleet, freight, ports and regulation
  • WTO13: full report tables on regional trade
  • EIA46: later monthly releases on Hormuz
  • Drewry16: weekly index history

A.6Publication acceptance record

Editorial self-check at evidence close. Every applicable item carries a disposition; the remaining items are review, approval and deposit.

Table A.9Publication acceptance record
GroupAreaItemsPassN/APending
D1Identity and scope8800
D2Source and data12912
D3Analysis and models12381
D4Findings and claims9801
D5Figures, tables, maps10622
D6Editorial and citations10802
D7Review and approval130013
D8Artefact and design12705
D9Registry and release9009

Publication gate

Conditions met
14 of 23 at evidence close
Blocking problems
none recorded
Open conditions
reviews, approval of the exact digest, deposit, registry pointer

Not applicable at baseline

Model runs
first runs in Q1 2027
Maps
plates in Q2 2027
Waivers
none

A.7Status words

Table A.10The status every value carries
StatusWhat it means
ObservedMeasured directly and published by the source.
ReportedPublished statistics of an official or institutional source.
DeclaredStated by the body concerned; not independently measured.
EstimatedA Nexus estimate from cited evidence, with its method in Annex A.
ModelledProduced by a stated model from cited inputs.
InferredReasoned from cited evidence; not measured.
ForecastA projection by the cited source.
SimulatedA simulation result under stated assumptions.
ScenarioA conditional statement under stated assumptions; never a prediction.
Expert inputExpert judgement, recorded with its basis.
CandidateProposed for a later edition; not yet evidence.
Evidence-quality levels (EQL 1 to 5) grade the source behind a value; they are not a score of the subject.

A.8How the edition is made, released and corrected

Every edition is built from a sealed evidence cut, reviewed under three keys, signed and deposited before any site shows it as published; corrections go to Nexus Standards as change proposals and feed the next cut.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Evidence arrives from the pillarsFoundry seals observations and indicator series, Universe hands over after-action and scenario findings, and contributions are screened at every gateway, including this site’s.
02 The cut is sealedOn the cut date the evidence is pinned under one identifier, so anyone can rebuild the edition from exactly what it was built on.
03 The edition is assembledThe edition is drafted from its template and content pack. Agents may draft; they never publish and never decide.
04 The keys turnAt the publisher of record the truth key comes first: every value is checked against its source or stated method before the meaning and capital keys turn. No edition moves on until every key has been turned by a named steward.
05 The gate opensA named approver releases one exact digest of the edition; any change after this point is a new version, never a silent edit.
06 Signed and depositedThe PDF, the web edition and the data bundle are signed together with a manifest and an RO-Crate description, and deposited on Zenodo with a concept and a version DOI.
07 Published on its desk’s siteOnly then does the edition show as published on its desk’s Reports site, and the Collection lists it as a part.
08 Corrections go to StandardsMethod and correction findings go to Nexus Standards as change proposals; citations, corrections and new contributions feed the next evidence cut.

A teaching model of the process, not a forecast and not a record of any run; dates and counts on this page come from the programme record. Sources: Reports governance at GCRI Canada (2026); Zenodo, repository of record for Reports deposits (2026).

Lifecycle, one state at a time: Draft, Computed, Evidence bound, Reviewed, Approved for release, Published, Corrected, Superseded. This edition is a draft.

A.9Glossary and abbreviations

Table A.11Series terms
TermMeaning
Baseline Editionthe inaugural annual edition that fixes the reference state for the series
WEFH+Bwater, energy, food, health and biodiversity, the national nexus core
Couplinga typed dependency through which one system transmits to another
Protection gapthe share of losses not covered by insurance
Capability ladderLISTED → EXISTS → ADEQUATE → TESTED → DEMONSTRATED
EQLevidence-quality level, 1–5
Evidence cuta frozen resolution of exact sources and versions
NNC · NLC · NWGNational Nexus Consortium · National Leadership Council · National Working Groups
Table A.12Abbreviations used in this edition
AbbreviationExpansion
AISautomatic identification system for vessels
EIAUS Energy Information Administration
FAOFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
IMFInternational Monetary Fund
IMOInternational Maritime Organization
LNGliquefied natural gas
MFNmost-favoured-nation
SCFIShanghai Containerized Freight Index
TEUtwenty-foot equivalent unit
UNCTADUnited Nations Trade and Development
WCIWorld Container Index
WTOWorld Trade Organization

A.10Technical annex

Table A.13Technical annex
ItemAnnexContentsStatus
A.1Indicator definitionsthe global indicator set, with units and sourcesIN THIS EDITION
A.2Coupling strengthsthe twenty-cell matrix and its rationaleIN THIS EDITION
A.3Scenario specificationSCN-SR03-CHK-01 assumptions and signpostsIN THIS EDITION
A.4Capability placementsrung evidence for fifteen functionsIN THIS EDITION
A.5Model diagnosticsfirst runs and validation2027
A.6Sensitivity analysesinfluence of coupling strengths2027
A.7Regional notesregional supply chain cardsWITH REGIONAL EDITIONS
A.8Review statementspass-by-pass review recordAT RELEASE

A.1 · indicator definition: chokepoint transit

Construct
a recorded passage of a vessel through a named strait or canal
Unit
vessels per day or per week
Method
vessel-tracking and canal-authority counts
Source
UNCTAD rapid assessment5; Drewry16
Uncertainty
counts differ by provider and by what is counted
Known limits
does not record cargo, flag or destination

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 46EIA (ed.), Short-Term Energy Outlook, September 2026, global oil markets (Brent averaged USD 91 a barrel in August 2026; Middle East crude oil production shut-ins from the Hormuz closure averaged 9.4 million barrels a day from March to June 2026 against February production of 25.2, and were 5.0 in July and 6.7 in August). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 5UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption deepens global economic strain across trade, prices and finance (second rapid assessment; transits about 130 a day in February and 6 in March 2026; merchandise trade growth 1.5 to 2.5 percent projected for 2026). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: Semiconductor Industry Association and Boston Consulting Group, Strengthening the Global Semiconductor Supply Chain in an Uncertain Era, 2021, taken from search-result summaries that disagree on the Taiwan share; no figure is used in findings. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (July 2026), taken only from the press article cited as reference 23; the IEA page returned an access error. International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, rare earths chapter; the publication returned an access error and no figure is used. US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 44UNVERIFIED, not opened: IMF (ed.), PortWatch, chokepoint transit and trade monitoring platform; the dashboard page returned no readable content and no figure is used. International Monetary Fund, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 18IMF (ed.), fourth review of Egypt’s arrangement (Suez Canal revenue USD 6.6 billion in FY2023/24 and projected USD 3.6 billion in FY2024/25), as reported by Hellenic Shipping News from Arab Finance; the IMF report itself was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025, chapter I: International maritime trade (12,720 million tons and 66,781 billion ton-miles in 2024; Cape detour about 30 percent; cobalt and copper concentration). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 13WTO (ed.), Global Trade Outlook and Statistics, news release of 19 March 2026 (2025 merchandise volume growth 4.6 percent; 2026 baseline 1.9 percent; high-energy-price case 1.4 percent; Hormuz traffic from 138 vessels a day to almost zero). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 16POST-CLOSE, context only: Drewry (ed.), World Container Index (assessment of 29 October 2026; composite USD 4,429 per 40ft; Shanghai to Los Angeles USD 7,514; Shanghai to Rotterdam USD 3,686; two vessels transiting Hormuz and 62 vessels through Suez in the previous week). Drewry Shipping Consultants, London. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Data appendix

The indicator set with its sources, the source registers, the licences of every kind of material and the formats of the edition.

10 min read0 figures8 tables15 notesNR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

B.1The indicator set

Table B.1Global baseline indicator set
IndicatorValueUnitYearStateSource
Seaborne trade volume12,720million tons2024Reported1
Seaborne trade, ton-miles66,781billion ton-miles2024Reported1
Cape detour, voyage length added≈ 30%2024Reported1
Suez share of maritime trade volume≈ 10%2023 to 2024Reported4
Hormuz total oil flow20.7million b/d2024Reported7
Middle East crude oil shut-ins, March to June average9.4million b/d2026Reported46
Middle East crude oil production, February25.2million b/d2026Reported46
Hormuz daily transits, March6vessels a day2026Reported5
Panama Canal transits13,404transitsFY2025Reported10
Panama Canal cargo489.1million CP/SUAB tonsFY2025Reported10
WTO merchandise volume growth, March baseline1.9%2026Reported13
Share of merchandise trade on MFN terms≈ 72%2025Reported15
Seaborne fertiliser trade through Hormuz≈ 16million tonnes2026Reported6
Drewry World Container Index composite4,429USD per 40ft29 Oct 2026Reported16
Rare earth refining share, top country≈ 85%2025Reported23

B.2Global source register

The governed source set behind this edition. Each source keeps its authority, coverage, cadence and role; categories describe origin, not truth.

Domains bound by the register

  • TRD
  • INF
  • ENE
  • CON
  • FIN
  • FOO
  • MIN
  • AIC
  • DAT
  • CLI
Table B.3Global source register
SourceCategoryCoveragePeriodCadenceRole
UNCTAD Review of Maritime Transport 20251UN agencyglobal2024annualseaborne trade
UNCTAD Review of Maritime Transport 20244UN agencyglobal2023 to 2024annualcanal shares
UNCTAD Hormuz assessment5UN agencyGulf2026per eventtransit drop
EIA chokepoints7national statistics agencyglobal2024annualoil flows
EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook46national statistics agencyGulf2025 to 2026monthlyHormuz-related oil shut-ins
Panama Canal Authority10canal operatorPanamaFY2025annualcanal traffic
WTO Global Trade Outlook13international organisationglobal2026twice a yeartrade forecast
WTO World Trade Report15international organisationglobal2025annualMFN share
Drewry World Container Index16shipping consultancyglobal2026weeklycontainer freight
FAO remarks17UN agencyglobal2026per eventfertiliser and food

B.3Regional reading, ten regional clusters

Map plates follow with the regional Baseline Editions, when boundary sources and public-safe resolutions are bound. This page gives the regional reading in table form and ranks no region.

Table B.4Regional reading, ten regional clusters
RegionPrincipal hazardsSystems most exposedBaseline evidence
North Americacanal dependence; container imports; tariff changesports, rail, canalsPanama Canal Authority10; WTO13
South Americabulk exports to Asia; canal and fertiliser dependenceports, fertiliserUNCTAD1; FAO17
EuropeRed Sea diversion; energy importscontainer routes, LNGUNCTAD1; EIA8
EurasiaBlack Sea and Turkish Straits routesgrain, oilEIA7
Middle East and North AfricaHormuz closure; Suez revenueoil, LNG, canalEIA46; IMF as reported18
Africacobalt exports; fertiliser and fuel importsminerals, fertiliserUNCTAD1; FAO17
South Asiaenergy and fertiliser imports through Hormuzoil, LNG, fertiliserUNCTAD5; FAO17
East Asiacontainer hubs; Malacca and Hormuz energy importscontainers, oilEIA7; WTO13
ASEANMalacca flows; electronics exportsoil, electronicsEIA7; WTO13
Oceania-Pacificlong routes; small island freight costscontainersUNCTAD2

B.4Regional card: Gulf and Strait of Hormuz

  • region
  • strait
  • energy
  • fertiliser
Systems in view
oil, LNG, fertiliser, shipping
Defining events
closure of the strait to most traffic from March 2026546
Couplings
ENE → FOO; ENE → INF
Capability evidence
rerouting and alternative suppliers; recovery not verified
Gaps
transits after Q2 2026; stocks held by importers
Agenda items
C-01 · C-03 · C-04

Estimated crude oil production shut-ins from the closure averaged 9.4 million barrels a day from March to June 2026, and 6.7 in August [46].

ENERGY

Oil and LNG

About one third of seaborne fertiliser trade normally passes through the strait, and urea prices rose sharply [6] [17].

FOOD

Fertiliser

Daily transits fell from about 130 to 6 in March 2026; only two vessels were reported in one week in late October [5] [16].

SHIPPING

Traffic

B.5How countries appear in the global edition

Countries enter the supply chains edition through the trade and logistics chapters of their own national editions, on one card grammar. They are read against peer distributions and thresholds, never placed in a league table.

Table B.5How countries appear in the global edition
Card fieldWhat it showsSource
WEFH+B stateeach core system against peer distribution bandsnational edition
Couplingsthe national dependency matrixnational edition
Risk objectsthe national risk portfolionational edition
Capability rungsthe national capability laddernational edition
Evidence ageoldest and newest source datesnational source register

Editions in the 2026 Baseline programme

26national

countries and unions

10regional

clusters

16global

flagship and sector

14strategic

systems reports

20frontier

technology reports

How to read a country card

  • Each system is shown against the distribution of its peers, with thresholds where they exist
  • Couplings and risk objects come from the country’s own national edition
  • Capability rungs record evidence, not a judgement of institutions
  • Evidence age is printed, so older national data are visible as such
Table B.6National Baseline Editions in the 2026 programme
WaveCountries and unionsState
W0CanadaISSUED
W1United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, European Union, SwitzerlandPLANNED
W2Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Türkiye, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, Senegal, Kenya, African Union, India, China, Republic of Korea, Indonesia, Singapore, AustraliaPLANNED

B.6Licences

Table B.7Licences of each kind of material
MaterialLicence
TextCC BY 4.0
Dataon the licence of each source; Nexus tables CC BY 4.0
FiguresNexus figures CC BY 4.0; third-party as credited
Mapsboundary source and licence printed on each plate
MetadataCC0 1.0, as Zenodo publishes it
Third-party data, figures and textThe source’s own licence, credited where it is used; never relicensed
Nexus-authored text, tables and figures: CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0). Map plates print their boundary source and licence.

B.7Formats and provenance

Table B.8This edition in every format
FormatKindStateWhat it isIdentifier
Web editionHTMLOn this siteDraft in stewardship review; every value resolves to its source.NR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Print editionPDFAt releaseA4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF, signed with the web edition at release.NR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Indicator dataCSV · JSONOn this site15 indicators with unit, year, status and source; the machine-readable copy ships with the evidence bundle at release.NR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE data release v1
FiguresSVG · PNGOn this site4 on the web edition: headline figure, figure 1.3, coupling instrument, capability ladder.FIG-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-*
SlidesPDFNot recordedNo slide deck is recorded for this edition.
Evidence briefHTML · PDFNot recordedNo evidence brief is recorded for this edition.
Dataset with DOIDataCiteAt releaseConcept and version DOI are minted at deposit; none is recorded yet.

Provenance

Edition pack
The edition’s content pack (JSON), from which the print and web editions are built
Evidence cut
DC-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-B0, closed 30 September 2026
Reproducibility
sourced values cited; analytical values reproducible from stated parameters
Self-check
14 of 23 at evidence close; a fail on any item blocks release
Review
five passes scheduled before release (in Annex C)
Publisher of record
GCRI for the Nexus Consortium
Corrections
Registry correction pathway; upheld corrections are published as notices with a new version

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025, chapter I: International maritime trade (12,720 million tons and 66,781 billion ton-miles in 2024; Cape detour about 30 percent; cobalt and copper concentration). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 4UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2024, chapter II: World shipping fleet and services (Suez Canal about 10 percent of maritime trade volume and 22 percent of container trade; Panama Canal about 3 percent). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 7EIA (ed.), World Oil Transit Chokepoints (last updated 3 March 2026; 2024 total oil flows: Hormuz 20.7, Malacca 22.5, Suez and SUMED 4.8, Bab el-Mandeb 4.1, Cape of Good Hope 9.3 million barrels a day). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 46EIA (ed.), Short-Term Energy Outlook, September 2026, global oil markets (Brent averaged USD 91 a barrel in August 2026; Middle East crude oil production shut-ins from the Hormuz closure averaged 9.4 million barrels a day from March to June 2026 against February production of 25.2, and were 5.0 in July and 6.7 in August). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 5UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption deepens global economic strain across trade, prices and finance (second rapid assessment; transits about 130 a day in February and 6 in March 2026; merchandise trade growth 1.5 to 2.5 percent projected for 2026). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 10Panama Canal Authority (ed.), Panama Canal maintains operational and financial strength (press release of 8 October 2025; fiscal year 2025: 13,404 transits and 489.1 million CP/SUAB tons; preliminary and unaudited). Autoridad del Canal de Panama, Panama City. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 13WTO (ed.), Global Trade Outlook and Statistics, news release of 19 March 2026 (2025 merchandise volume growth 4.6 percent; 2026 baseline 1.9 percent; high-energy-price case 1.4 percent; Hormuz traffic from 138 vessels a day to almost zero). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 15WTO (ed.), World Trade Report 2026: A critical juncture for the world trading system (about 72 percent of merchandise trade on MFN terms). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 6UNCTAD (ed.), initial assessment of the Strait of Hormuz disruption of 10 March 2026 (about one third of global seaborne fertiliser trade, about 16 million tonnes), as reported by a Pakistani daily newspaper; the UNCTAD text itself was not opened. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 16POST-CLOSE, context only: Drewry (ed.), World Container Index (assessment of 29 October 2026; composite USD 4,429 per 40ft; Shanghai to Los Angeles USD 7,514; Shanghai to Rotterdam USD 3,686; two vessels transiting Hormuz and 62 vessels through Suez in the previous week). Drewry Shipping Consultants, London. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 23Investment Monitor (ed.), China rare earth curbs put USD 6.5 trillion of output at risk, article of 16 July 2026 reporting the IEA Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (about 85 percent top-country rare earth refining share in 2025; investment down 9 percent in 2025); the IEA report itself was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 17FAO (ed.), Strait of Hormuz crisis: FAO Director-General outlines risks, actions and policy responses (remarks to the 180th Council session, 28 April 2026; urea up 52 percent in the United States and 60 percent in Brazil by mid-April). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 8EIA (ed.), Amid regional conflict, the Strait of Hormuz remains critical oil chokepoint (Today in Energy, 16 June 2025; about 20 million barrels a day, about one fifth of global LNG trade in 2024). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 18IMF (ed.), fourth review of Egypt’s arrangement (Suez Canal revenue USD 6.6 billion in FY2023/24 and projected USD 3.6 billion in FY2024/25), as reported by Hellenic Shipping News from Arab Finance; the IMF report itself was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 2UNCTAD (ed.), Stormy seas for global shipping: UNCTAD warns of uncertainty, volatility and rising costs (press release of 24 September 2025; 2025 volume growth 0.5 percent; port fees on certain vessels; alternative-fuel share 8 percent). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

References and record

Every source the edition rests on, the publication record, the corrections log and the open record.

15 min read0 figures1 table0 notesNR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

C.146 sources

NR-CIT-1, editor first. A DOI is linked where the source has one; Nexus records carry a UNI once the catalogue allocates it (NS-1).

  1. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025, chapter I: International maritime trade (12,720 million tons and 66,781 billion ton-miles in 2024; Cape detour about 30 percent; cobalt and copper concentration). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 5, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  2. 2UNCTAD (ed.), Stormy seas for global shipping: UNCTAD warns of uncertainty, volatility and rising costs (press release of 24 September 2025; 2025 volume growth 0.5 percent; port fees on certain vessels; alternative-fuel share 8 percent). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 6
  3. 3UNCTAD (ed.), Maritime trade under pressure, growth set to stall in 2025 (news item; Suez Canal tonnage 70 percent below 2023 in May 2025; Shanghai Containerized Freight Index averaged 2,496 in 2024). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 2
  4. 4UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2024, chapter II: World shipping fleet and services (Suez Canal about 10 percent of maritime trade volume and 22 percent of container trade; Panama Canal about 3 percent). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  5. 5UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption deepens global economic strain across trade, prices and finance (second rapid assessment; transits about 130 a day in February and 6 in March 2026; merchandise trade growth 1.5 to 2.5 percent projected for 2026). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 5, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  6. 6UNCTAD (ed.), initial assessment of the Strait of Hormuz disruption of 10 March 2026 (about one third of global seaborne fertiliser trade, about 16 million tonnes), as reported by a Pakistani daily newspaper; the UNCTAD text itself was not opened. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  7. 7EIA (ed.), World Oil Transit Chokepoints (last updated 3 March 2026; 2024 total oil flows: Hormuz 20.7, Malacca 22.5, Suez and SUMED 4.8, Bab el-Mandeb 4.1, Cape of Good Hope 9.3 million barrels a day). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  8. 8EIA (ed.), Amid regional conflict, the Strait of Hormuz remains critical oil chokepoint (Today in Energy, 16 June 2025; about 20 million barrels a day, about one fifth of global LNG trade in 2024). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3
  9. 9POST-CLOSE, context only: EIA (ed.), Short-Term Energy Outlook, October 2026, global energy security data (Hormuz oil flow 21.6, 14.9 and 4.9 million barrels a day; LNG 10.5, 7.4 and 0.8 billion cubic feet a day; released 6 October 2026). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.
  10. 10Panama Canal Authority (ed.), Panama Canal maintains operational and financial strength (press release of 8 October 2025; fiscal year 2025: 13,404 transits and 489.1 million CP/SUAB tons; preliminary and unaudited). Autoridad del Canal de Panama, Panama City. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  11. 11POST-CLOSE, context only: WTO (ed.), Global Trade Outlook and Statistics, update of October 2026 (news release of 8 October 2026; 2026 merchandise volume growth 3.9 percent, 2027 4.1 percent; Middle East merchandise exports minus 17.2 percent in 2026). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.
  12. 12POST-CLOSE, context only: WTO (ed.), Global Trade Outlook and Statistics, executive summary of the October 2026 update (AI-enabling goods 47 percent of merchandise trade growth and 14.8 percent of trade in the first half of 2026). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.
  13. 13WTO (ed.), Global Trade Outlook and Statistics, news release of 19 March 2026 (2025 merchandise volume growth 4.6 percent; 2026 baseline 1.9 percent; high-energy-price case 1.4 percent; Hormuz traffic from 138 vessels a day to almost zero). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  14. 14WTO and UNCTAD (eds.), Global goods trade resilient in Q1 2026 despite Middle East war (WTO news item of 31 July 2026; Middle East export volumes down 9.7 percent and import volumes down 11.9 percent year on year in the first quarter). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 1
  15. 15WTO (ed.), World Trade Report 2026: A critical juncture for the world trading system (about 72 percent of merchandise trade on MFN terms). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  16. 16POST-CLOSE, context only: Drewry (ed.), World Container Index (assessment of 29 October 2026; composite USD 4,429 per 40ft; Shanghai to Los Angeles USD 7,514; Shanghai to Rotterdam USD 3,686; two vessels transiting Hormuz and 62 vessels through Suez in the previous week). Drewry Shipping Consultants, London. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 4, chapter 6
  17. 17FAO (ed.), Strait of Hormuz crisis: FAO Director-General outlines risks, actions and policy responses (remarks to the 180th Council session, 28 April 2026; urea up 52 percent in the United States and 60 percent in Brazil by mid-April). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  18. 18IMF (ed.), fourth review of Egypt’s arrangement (Suez Canal revenue USD 6.6 billion in FY2023/24 and projected USD 3.6 billion in FY2024/25), as reported by Hellenic Shipping News from Arab Finance; the IMF report itself was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  19. 19FreightWaves (ed.), Suez container ships near low for all of 2025 (2 December 2025; container transits about 4.7 to 5.0 a day in July to November 2025; sources include Xeneta and a shipping agency). FreightWaves, Chattanooga. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4
  20. 20News report, Facts about the Strait of Hormuz since its negotiated reopening (last updated 8 April 2026; Kpler: average of eight commodity carriers a day from 1 March to 7 April; Lloyd’s List estimate of about 800 ships stuck in the Gulf; two-week ceasefire). Arab News Pakistan, Islamabad. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 2, chapter 8
  21. 21Lloyd’s List Intelligence (ed.), Bab el-Mandeb transits continue to decline but slight uptick for Suez Canal (blog; data for the week ending 10 March 2024: Bab el-Mandeb 218 passings, 60 percent below normal; the page carries a 2026 date, which is not reconciled). Lloyd’s List Intelligence, London. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.
  22. 22China Briefing (ed.), How will China’s rare earth export controls impact industries and businesses? (April 2025 controls on seven elements; 9 October 2025 expansion to five more; suspended until 10 November 2026). Dezan Shira and Associates, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  23. 23Investment Monitor (ed.), China rare earth curbs put USD 6.5 trillion of output at risk, article of 16 July 2026 reporting the IEA Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (about 85 percent top-country rare earth refining share in 2025; investment down 9 percent in 2025); the IEA report itself was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  24. 24IMO (ed.), SOLAS chapter XI-2 and the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (web page; mandatory Part A and guidance Part B; in force 1 July 2004). International Maritime Organization, London. Observation year 2004. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  25. 25WTO (ed.), Trade Facilitation Agreement (web page; Bali Ministerial Conference 2013; in force 22 February 2017). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  26. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (July 2026), taken only from the press article cited as reference 23; the IEA page returned an access error. International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  27. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, rare earths chapter; the publication returned an access error and no figure is used. US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  28. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: Semiconductor Industry Association and Boston Consulting Group, Strengthening the Global Semiconductor Supply Chain in an Uncertain Era, 2021, taken from search-result summaries that disagree on the Taiwan share; no figure is used in findings. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6, chapter 8
  29. 29UNVERIFIED, not opened: United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982), regime of transit passage through straits used for international navigation, cited from memory. United Nations, New York. Observation year 1982. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  30. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: Convention regarding the Regime of the Straits (Montreux Convention), 1936, cited from memory. Observation year 1936. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  31. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: Convention respecting the Free Navigation of the Suez Maritime Canal (Constantinople Convention), 1888, cited from memory. Observation year 1888. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  32. 32UNVERIFIED, not opened: Treaty concerning the Permanent Neutrality and Operation of the Panama Canal, 1977, cited from memory. Observation year 1977. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  33. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO 28000:2022, Security and resilience: security management systems for the supply chain. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  34. 34UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO 31000:2018, Risk management: guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  35. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials (Critical Raw Materials Act), Official Journal of the European Union, 2024, cited from memory; the EUR-Lex request returned no text. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  36. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: Regulation (EU) 2023/1781 establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s semiconductor ecosystem (Chips Act), Official Journal of the European Union, 2023, cited from memory. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  37. 37UNVERIFIED, not opened: World Customs Organization (ed.), SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade, cited from memory. World Customs Organization, Brussels. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  38. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: Acemoglu, D., Carvalho, V.M., Ozdaglar, A. and Tahbaz-Salehi, A., The network origins of aggregate fluctuations, Econometrica 80(5), 1977 to 2016, 2012, cited from memory. Observation year 2012. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6
  39. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Carvalho, V.M., Nirei, M., Saito, Y.U. and Tahbaz-Salehi, A., Supply chain disruptions: evidence from the Great East Japan Earthquake, Quarterly Journal of Economics 136(2), 1255 to 1321, 2021, cited from memory. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6
  40. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: Barrot, J.-N. and Sauvagnat, J., Input specificity and the propagation of idiosyncratic shocks in production networks, Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(3), 1543 to 1592, 2016, cited from memory. Observation year 2016. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6
  41. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: Baldwin, R. and Freeman, R., Risks and global supply chains: what we know and what we need to know, Annual Review of Economics 14, 153 to 180, 2022, cited from memory. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  42. 42UNVERIFIED, not opened: Benigno, G., di Giovanni, J., Groen, J.J.J. and Noble, A.I., The Global Supply Chain Pressure Index: a new tool to measure supply chain disruptions, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 2022, cited from memory; the index page returned no definition. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  43. 43UNVERIFIED, not opened: Rodrigue, J.-P., The Geography of Transport Systems, 5th edition. Routledge, New York, 2020, cited from memory. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  44. 44UNVERIFIED, not opened: IMF (ed.), PortWatch, chokepoint transit and trade monitoring platform; the dashboard page returned no readable content and no figure is used. International Monetary Fund, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4
  45. 45UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Trade Representative, Section 301 action on China’s targeted maritime, logistics and shipbuilding sectors, 2025 (port fees on certain vessels); the page returned an error and the measure is known here only from the UNCTAD press release cited as reference 2. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  46. 46EIA (ed.), Short-Term Energy Outlook, September 2026, global oil markets (Brent averaged USD 91 a barrel in August 2026; Middle East crude oil production shut-ins from the Hormuz closure averaged 9.4 million barrels a day from March to June 2026 against February production of 25.2, and were 5.0 in July and 6.7 in August). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 5, chapter 6, chapter 8

C.2Publication record

Publication

Title
Strategic Systems Report 2026: Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints, Baseline Edition
Series
Reports · Strategic Systems Series SR-03
Edition
Baseline Edition 2026 · inaugural annual
Version
v1.0.0 · draft for stewardship review
Publication ID
NR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Evidence close
30 September 2026
Publication date
October 2026
DOI
concept and version DOI at deposit

Publisher

Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), for the Nexus Consortium
Place
Toronto
Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor
Stewards
GCRI · technical truth · GRF · public meaning · GRA · capital meaning
Licence
text CC BY 4.0; data on the terms of each source
Copyright
© 2026 GCRI · Nexus Consortium
Language
English (en-GB) source edition
Correspondence
Registry correction pathway · editorial office

Colophon

Format
A4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF
Typefaces
Space Grotesk (display) · Geist (text) · IBM Plex Sans Italic (standfirsts) · IBM Plex Mono (data)
Design standard
Reports Foundational Edition, Volume I, Part VII
Accessibility
tagged PDF and HTML targets; text alternatives for every figure
Production
Reports editorial team, GCRI

Release path for this version

Table C.1Release path for this version
StepWhat happensWhen
Drafteditorial self-check complete at evidence closeOctober 2026
Steward reviewfive passes on the exact draft (keys T · M · F · N)Q4 2026
Approvalpublication authority approves the exact digestbefore release
Depositconcept and version DOI minted; registry pointer setat release
Successionthe 2027 supply chains and chokepoints edition reports changes against this baseline2027
Current version
v1.0.0 draft, stewardship review
Previous edition
none, first edition of the series
Next edition
NR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2027-v1.0.0
Latest version
resolve the concept DOI or the registry record
Correction route
Registry correction pathway
Notice types
erratum · addendum · supersession · withdrawal

C.3Corrections log

0correction notices. No edition has been released yet, so none can be corrected; the log below lists each edition’s current version.

EditionVersionDateStateChangeNotice
SR-03NR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0October 2026DraftBaseline Edition 2026, inaugural annual edition,None

Notice types: erratum, addendum, supersession, withdrawal. A correction is a new version with a published notice; the earlier version stays resolvable, and no edition is ever edited in silence.

C.4Open record

This edition’s open record

Publication ID
NR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Desk identifier and series alias
NR-STR-SR-03-2026-BL
Collection
None
DOI
Concept and version DOI at deposit, on Zenodo with DataCite metadata
Versions
Each correction is a new version (isNewVersionOf); the concept DOI resolves to the latest
Bundle
RO-Crate 1.2 with CITATION.cff, CodeMeta and PROV-O provenance; a signed manifest
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0) for original material; metadata CC0 1.0

Credit and identity

ORCID
Your iD in the deposit and the contribution record; DataCite can then add the work to your ORCID record
ROR
Your organisation by its ROR identifier, never by a typed name alone
CRediT
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualisation, Writing, review and editing
Account
None needed to contribute; never a password

Find and follow

Search the open indexes for Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints; software is cited by its SWHID from Software Heritage, and a quantified scenario run is preregistered on OSF before it is run. Annotation is your choice: Hypothesis opens this page in its own viewer.

Mirrors and harvest

The DOI is canonical. At release each signed bundle is also given an IPFS content identifier and a bloxberg anchor as mirrors; both are listed in the record once they exist. Zenodo exposes every record over OAI-PMH, and reviews and endorsements can arrive through COAR Notify where the repository supports it.

InvenioRDM metadata for a contribution on Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints, prefilled from this page
{
  "metadata": {
    "resource_type": {
      "id": "dataset"
    },
    "title": "Evidence on Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints for Nexus Reports",
    "publication_date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
    "creators": [
      {
        "person_or_org": {
          "type": "personal",
          "family_name": "Your family name",
          "given_name": "Your given name",
          "identifiers": [
            {
              "scheme": "orcid",
              "identifier": "0000-0000-0000-0000"
            }
          ]
        },
        "affiliations": [
          {
            "id": "ROR identifier of your organisation"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "description": "What it is, where its record is kept and how it bears on Strategic Systems Report 2026: Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints.",
    "rights": [
      {
        "id": "cc-by-4.0"
      }
    ],
    "subjects": [
      {
        "subject": "Nexus Reports"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Strategic Systems Report · SR-03"
      }
    ],
    "related_identifiers": [
      {
        "identifier": "https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/editions/sr-03/",
        "scheme": "url",
        "relation_type": {
          "id": "issupplementto"
        },
        "resource_type": {
          "id": "publication-report"
        }
      }
    ],
    "version": "1.0.0"
  },
  "custom_fields": {},
  "access": {
    "record": "public",
    "files": "public"
  },
  "files": {
    "enabled": true
  },
  "parent": {
    "communities": {
      "default": "nexusreports"
    }
  }
}

C.5Where this edition sits among the six pillars

Foundry seals the evidence and Universe tests it; Reports publishes it; Standards takes its corrections and Academy teaches from it.

  1. F03 Sealed observations and indicator series Foundry Sealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
  2. F04 After-action and scenario findings for Universe After-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
  3. F05 National Portfolio movement for chapter Foundry National Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
  4. Applied in editions Standards Nexus Standards: applied in editions.
  5. SR-03 edition Reports Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints 2026, published in every format with its sources, citation and corrections.
  6. F06 Method and correction findings as change Standards Method and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
  7. F12 Q4 synthesis informs the next-year Universe Q4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
  8. Taught in the open Academy Risk Academy: taught in the open.

What Foundry and Universe hand to this edition, and what it hands to Standards, Universe and Academy. From the programme spine; SR-03 is a drafted Baseline Edition, so these handoffs run from its first operational quarter.

HandoffBetweenWhat crosses, and when
F03Foundry to ReportsSealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
F04Universe to ReportsAfter-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
F05Foundry to ReportsNational Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
RingNexus Standards to ReportsNexus Standards: applied in editions.
F06Reports to Nexus StandardsMethod and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
F12Reports to UniverseQ4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
RingReports to Risk AcademyRisk Academy: taught in the open.
ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the GCRI Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskStrategic Systems

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.