Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI)
Teams in Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems adopted to deliver a defined piece of work, each with a workplan, a supervisor and a clear end. A working group has no public authority beyond its workplan.
GCRI · In development · service level R0
A working group of Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems is a team adopted to deliver one defined piece of work in the artificial intelligence field, with terms of reference, a workplan, a supervisor and an end date. Candidate subjects come from the platform's topics, such as AI cyber security. A working group holds no authority beyond its workplan, and its outputs are reviewed before publication.
Fig.The path from an enquiry to a credited contribution. Design, not a record; no step creates membership.
For working groups, in GCRI's spatial-intelligence reading, the map opens on night lights, population density and true-colour imagery with true colour from NASA GIBS, framed on East Asia; 3 further NASA layers wait in the list.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 3
People and exposure, for this page
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
For working groups, in GCRI's spatial-intelligence reading, the map opens on night lights, population density and true-colour imagery with true colour from NASA GIBS, framed on East Asia; 3 further NASA layers wait in the list.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place; claim ceiling INTEGRATED.
Layers and dates
| Question | Possible deliverable | Disciplines |
|---|---|---|
| What minimum evaluation should precede AI use in a public service decision? | An evaluation protocol | AI evaluation, public administration, law |
| How should agent permissions be specified and audited? | A specification note | Security, AI engineering, assurance |
Write to contact@therisk.global. The acknowledgement gives a reference and names the next step.
Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Working group | A team adopted to deliver a defined piece of work under terms of reference, with a workplan, a supervisor and an end date; it has no public authority beyond its workplan. |
| Terms of reference | The document that defines an assignment's objectives, scope, deliverables, counterpart, acceptance criteria and reserved decisions. |
| Work breakdown structure | A hierarchical breakdown of a project's scope into manageable work packages. |
| Calibration | The match between a model's stated confidence and how often it is actually correct. |
The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.
The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.