Skip to content

GCRI · About GCRI

Mission and public value

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) helps countries understand systemic risk and build the evidence and capability to become more resilient. Evidence matters only when it becomes capacity: tested options, trained teams, durable tools and published findings that decision-makers can examine. The mission, its public value and its limits are below. Part of About GCRI.

Make an enquiry Back to About GCRI
01Contents

Mission and public value in four parts.

In this dossier4 parts
  1. 01MissionUnderstanding systemic risk, building the evidence and capability for resilience
  2. 02ThesisFrom a material question to a competent next action
  3. 03Public valueWhat success would look like, and what it would not
  4. 04AmbitionStanding that is earned, not asserted
02Mission

Understanding systemic risk, building the evidence and capability for resilience.

The systems that sustain societies are coupled. A drought becomes a power shortage, a food price shock and a health emergency. A software failure halts ports, payments and hospitals at once. Mandates, data and budgets stay divided by sector and border, so the most consequential risks are the least examined as a whole. GCRI examines them as a whole, with methods others can reproduce and challenge.

Research

Risk science

Multi-hazard and climate risk, systemic and cascading risk, and foresight on emerging risk. See Institutional research.

Development

Risk technology

The shared Foundry environment, earth observation, sovereign data and AI, and resilience engineering.

Policy

Policy research

Evidence and technical options for public decisions, interoperable methods and bounded technical assistance.

03Thesis

From a material question to a competent next action.

Public value is created only when each link in the chain holds. The programme is designed so that every step leaves a record and can be checked.

  1. 01

    Material question

    A country, region or institution names a priority with an accountable owner.

  2. 02

    Evidence and build

    Sources, methods and uncertainty are qualified, and models and scenarios are built in a persistent, governed environment.

  3. 03

    Controlled test

    Selected work is tested in the annual programme under exercise controls.

  4. 04

    Reviewed publication

    Findings, failures and corrections become citable evidence.

  5. 05

    Competent next action

    Governments, operators and licensed institutions decide under their own authority, and corrections renew the next cycle.

04Governance and structure

How the institution is governed.

Governance

Technical office and Secretariat

Consortium · Governance · Research · Platforms · Programme year · Foundry · Standards · Reports · Take part · Foundry year · Reports year · Handoffs · Contributed capacity · Programme states · Records · Report streams · The programme year · A national mission · Mission admission · Data and resources qualified · Build accepted for exercise · Action Week live operation · Stand-down and evidence sealed · Publication authorised · Correction and renewal · The Nexus cycle · National Nexus · Regional programmes · Working groups · Competence Cells and CERT · Joining as institution · Governance dialogues · Platform onboarding · Foundry builds · Labs · Reports · Standards adoption · Risk Academy · Index data intake · Finance readiness dossier · The Nexus Consortium · Twenty-seven phase cycle · Executable annual cycle · Complaint and appeal · Engineering change · Incident response and forensics · Provider exit and decommissioning · De-risking case handoff · Founding and institutional establishment · Consortium formation lifecycle · National Nexus formation · Constitutional amendment · Independent review and appeal · Correction and contestability · Body charter and council · Succession · Public interest and anti-capture · External authority hand-off · Funding · Ethics · Public transparency · Data stewardship and trust · Gates G0 to G7 · Forming the annual agenda · Adopting a Nexus Standard · NNC membership · Year-One leadership pathway · Working-group assignment by competence · National company and SPV · Public-authority interface and delegation · Annual Universe operating cycle · Provider qualification

GCRI is one institution working through two organisations, with GCRI Canada as Lead Institution, Consortium Secretariat and lead contracting organisation.

  1. 01 Two organisations

    1. 01GCRI CanadaStart · Canadian not-for-profit, OntarioLead Institution, Consortium Secretariat and lead contracting organisation.
    2. 02GCRI USStart · A separate organisationGCRI’s United States institution, with its own legal identity and responsibilities.

  2. 02 Secretariat and office

    1. 03Consortium SecretariatStep · GCRI CanadaCoordinates the programme and routes correspondence to the regional and country desks.
    2. 04Universe technical officeStep · GCRIScoping, qualification, the Core build, exercise control, evidence capture and closeout.

  3. 03 Roles of record

    1. 05Standards SecretariatRecord · GCRI CanadaGCRI Canada is Secretariat and publisher of record of the Nexus Standards.
    2. 06Academy issuer of recordRecord · GCRI CanadaNo credential is issued until the method, signing key and revocation path are on record.
    3. 07Reports publisherRecord · GCRIGCRI publishes Reports. The Global Risks Forum (GRF) authorises publication at G6.

  4. 04 Limit

    1. 08Never regulates, certifies, licenses or approvesGate · GCRIFindings carry their methods and uncertainty. GCRI decides for no one.
    2. 09Authority decidesOutcome · The competent authorityDecisions and execution stay with the government, operator or licensed institution.

GCRI · GCRI Canada · GCRI USAn outline of how the work is designed to run; it does not report the status of any decision or record.

05Public value

What success would look like, and what it would not.

  • Countries that hold their own models, data and trained teams, with a portability and exit plan.
  • Findings that a critic can trace to sources and methods, and challenge without membership or payment.
  • Negative results and failed tests published alongside successful ones.
  • No ranking of countries, no single risk score and no claim of authority over a national decision.
06Ambition

Standing that is earned, not asserted.

GCRI works to become a trusted reference institution and operating community for systemic risk and responsible innovation. That standing has to be earned: reproducible methods, independent challenge, useful products and a visible correction record. Its commitments are on Public accountability. Its partners state their own missions, such as the mission of The Global Risks Forum (GRF).

07Questions

Questions and answers.

Is GCRI a think tank, a laboratory or a technology provider?
It combines research, technology development and policy research in one institution, held to one standard of evidence. It does not sell a product, and it does not take public decisions.
Why systemic risk rather than single hazards?
Because the largest losses come from compound and cascading events across water, energy, food, health, ecosystems and infrastructure, which assessments made one sector at a time miss.
Who benefits from GCRI’s work?
Public institutions, operators and communities that need shared evidence and tested options, and the public, through reports published with their methods and corrections.
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Bring a method, a dataset or a question.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

Propose a method See all contact routes
Legal

Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.

Privacy choices