GCRI · Health Nexus

Corrections and concerns

How to challenge content on Health Nexus, report an error or raise a concern, and what happens next.

02Routes

Where to write.

ConcernWrite to
An error or a challenge to a findingthe integrity concern form
Privacythe privacy request form
A safeguarding concernthe safeguarding report form
03Common errors

The mistakes most often found in health analysis.

  • Comparing case counts across places with different testing.
  • Treating physical beds as staffed capacity.
  • Reading a scenario projection as a prediction.
  • Using crude rates where age structure differs.
04Process

How the process runs.

Process

How a correction moves

Anyone may request a correction without membership; an accepted one becomes a new version, and the earlier version stays on record with the reason.

  1. 01 Reporter

    1. 01Anyone may ask for a correctionActor · AnyoneAnyone may ask for a correction, without membership. No membership or Account is needed to report harm or correct public information.
  2. 02 Route and acknowledge

    1. 02Routed by kind of concernStepA scientific correction or integrity concern goes to the responsible editor or source owner.
    2. 03AcknowledgementRecordAnyone who raises a question, shares local knowledge or reports a concern gets an acknowledgement and an issue disposition.
  3. 03 Review

    1. 04Review by editor or source ownerStep · The responsible editor or source ownerA reviewer with a declared conflict never signs the relevant acceptance.
    2. 05Complaint about a decisionStep · A reviewer not responsible for the decisionA programme or decision complaint is reviewed by someone not responsible for the contested decision.
    3. 06Privacy, security and safeguarding queuesStepPrivacy and rights requests go to the Privacy Officer queue, security reports to the security disclosure queue.
  4. 04 Outcome

    1. 07Accepted correction becomes a new versionRecordAn accepted correction creates a new recorded version.
    2. 08Issue disposition recordedRecordThe reporter gets an issue disposition and, where appropriate, a remedy or referral. The docs name no appeal for a declined correction.
  5. 05 Carried into the record

    1. 09Affected analysis re-run with corrected inputsStep · Foundry pillarThe affected analysis is re-run with the corrected inputs.
    2. 10Change proposal to the standardsRecord · Nexus StandardsMethod and correction findings go to Nexus Standards as change proposals (F06). It records the correction as a change to the evidence.
    3. 11Courses that taught the finding updatedStep · Risk AcademyRisk Academy updates any course that taught the corrected finding.
    4. 12New version with correction and reasonRecord · ReportsReports publishes a new version with the correction and its reason. The earlier version stays on record with the correction history.

Status and service levels · Reports · The programme yearDesigned process, not a record of any case: no cycle has run and every programme is at service level R0, information and enquiries. A gate is a programme decision, never a public-authority approval, a certification or a deployment authorisation. The competent authority decides.

05What happens next

What happens next.

  1. 01

    Acknowledgement

    You receive a reference and the next step.

  2. 02

    Review

    The concern is reviewed by someone not involved in the original work, where possible.

  3. 03

    Outcome

    A correction is published as a new version with its history; a declined challenge receives reasons.

06Sources

Where this page’s references lead.

The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.

07Questions

Questions and answers.

Can I raise a concern anonymously?
Yes, though we may not be able to follow up without a way to reach you.
Health Nexus

Bring a method, a dataset or a question.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.