Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

  • Reports
  • Baseline Edition 2026
  • Complete edition

Global Infrastructure and Logistics Risk and Resilience Report 2026: Baseline Edition, The State of the World’s Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics.

Edition home

Choose A4 or Letter in the print dialog; running heads and page numbers are added in print. This is a review copy: the signed PDF with its DOI is issued at release.

ReportsGS-09

Global Sector Risk and Resilience

Global Infrastructure and Logistics 2026

Baseline Edition 2026NR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINEGCRI for the Nexus Consortium

Imprint

Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor, the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI)
Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) for the Nexus Consortium, Toronto
Report number
NR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE
Evidence close
30 September 2026, cut DC-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Status
Draft under stewardship review; not yet released
DOI and UNI
Issued at deposit
Licence
CC BY 4.0 for Nexus-authored text, tables and figures; third-party material keeps its own licence
Cite as
Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Global Infrastructure and Logistics Risk and Resilience Report 2026: Baseline Edition, The State of the World’s Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics. (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI). https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/editions/gs-09/

Contents

  1. ·

    Executive summary

  2. 1

    Chapter 1. Infrastructure is what the other systems travel on

  3. 2

    Chapter 2. Key findings

  4. 3

    Chapter 3. Systems and sectors at baseline

  5. 4

    Chapter 4. Risks and capability

  6. 5

    Chapter 5. Chokepoint closure with port downtime and a cyber incident

  7. 6

    Chapter 6. Readings from the other desks

  8. 7

    Chapter 7. The 2027 agenda

  9. 8

    Chapter 8. Systems in depth

  10. A

    Annex A. Methodology

  11. B

    Annex B. Data appendix

  12. C

    Annex C. References and record

Executive summary

The edition on a few pages: the abstract, the key messages, the headline finding and what each steward reads in it.

6 min read1 figure0 tables12 notesNR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

S.1Abstract

The world’s infrastructure carries more load, over longer distances and through narrower passages, than a decade ago. Seaborne trade reached 12,720 million tons in 2024, up 2.2%, while ton-miles rose 5.9% as ships rerouted around the Cape of Good Hope1. The average voyage haul grew from 4,831 miles in 2018 to 5,245 miles in 20241. Container ports handled 913 million TEU in 20246. The Strait of Hormuz showed how fast a chokepoint can fail: daily ship transits averaged 129 in February 2026 and fell by 97% in early March, in a strait that carried about 20 million barrels of oil a day in 20242. Hazard exposure is the quiet risk. About 27% of road and rail assets are exposed to at least one hazard15, 86% of ports face more than three hazards17, and infrastructure disruption costs households and firms in low- and middle-income countries USD 391 to 647 billion a year, in a 2019 estimate14. People bear the cost directly: road crashes killed 1.19 million people in 202111. Connectivity is a second layer: 6.3 billion people are online in 2026 and 2 billion are not10. Investment evidence is dated: the 2017 outlook put the need to 2040 at USD 94 trillion21. This baseline sets out what the evidence supports and where it is thin. It ranks no country, port or operator and recommends no route or policy.

S.2Key messages

Six readings that frame the infrastructure and logistics baseline, and the eight questions this edition answers, each with its status and source.

  1. Seaborne trade reached 12,720 million tons in 2024; container ports handled 913 million TEU.16

    How much does the world ship?Reported

  2. Yes. The average haul grew from 4,831 miles in 2018 to 5,245 miles in 2024.1

    Are routes getting longer?Reported

  3. Hormuz transits fell by 97% within days in March 2026.2

    How fast can a chokepoint fail?Reported

  4. Disruption costs USD 391 to 647 billion a year in low- and middle-income countries; ports carry USD 63 to 81 billion of trade at risk a year in two models.141617

    What do hazards cost networks?Reported

  5. Road crashes killed 1.19 million people in 2021, mostly in low- and middle-income countries.11

    Who pays the human price?Reported

  6. Slowly. 2 billion people remain offline; 3G or better covers 96%.105

    Is the connectivity gap closing?Reported

  7. The 2017 outlook found USD 18 trillion unfunded to 2040; no current global estimate was found.21

    Is investment enough?Reported

  8. A chokepoint closure that coincides with port weather downtime and a cyber incident. SCN-GS09-HRM-01

    What will 2027 test first?Expert input

S.3Headline finding

ReportedEQL 4NRF-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-TRD-002

Daily ship transits through the Strait of Hormuz averaged 129 on 1 to 27 February 2026 and fell by 97% in early March.

Figure S.1Daily ship transits through the Strait of Hormuz
ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
Average, 1 to 27 February 2026129
Early March 2026, about (derived from the 97% fall)4

Source: UNCTAD, Strait of Hormuz Disruptions, 10 March 2026, from Clarksons Research data2. The early March value is the editors’ derivation (method 2).

The strait carried about 20 million barrels of oil a day in 2024. UNCTAD put this at 25% of seaborne oil trade in March 2026, and its 2025 Review gave about 34% of seaborne oil exports and 11% of maritime trade. Around one third of seaborne fertiliser trade, about 16 million tonnes, also passes through it213.

S.4At a glance

12,720million tons

seaborne trade, 20241

913million TEU

container port traffic, 20246

97%

fall in Hormuz transits, March 20262

27%

road and rail assets exposed to a hazard15

1.19million

road deaths, 202111

6.3billion

people online, 202610

S.5What each steward reads in it

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports reading infrastructure as the carrier layer of the WEFH+B system.

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people infrastructure risk arrives as a delayed delivery, a closed road or a dropped connection.

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. The need estimate is dated, port and network risks are modelled in the hundreds of billions, and freight and insurance costs repriced in 2026.

NEXUS

Synthesis

Infrastructure is well measured at the level of trade volumes and port traffic and thinly measured at the level of asset condition, maintenance and recovery.

S.6What this edition is, and is not

What this edition is

A baseline: the 2026 state of the world’s infrastructure, transport and logistics systems and the couplings through which it carries risk into other systems. It synthesises published evidence and ranks no country, company or asset.

What it is not

Not a logistics performance index, a freight-rate forecast, a route recommendation or an assessment of any port, carrier, airport, operator or government. Infrastructure policy, investment and operations rest with national authorities, owners and operators.

What comes next

National, regional and sector evidence feeds the 2027 infrastructure and logistics edition through the federation. Each edition reports what changed against this baseline: observations, source revisions, method changes, scenario updates and corrections.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025: Staying the course in turbulent waters (full report and overview). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 6DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, container port traffic (TEU), series IS.SHP.GOOD.TU, API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 2UNCTAD (ed.), Strait of Hormuz Disruptions: Implications for Global Trade and Development, rapid analysis dated 10 March 2026, from Clarksons Research, EIA, LSEG, Kpler and other data. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 15Koks, E.E. et al., A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets, Nature Communications 10, 2677, 2019 (abstract via Crossref). Springer Nature. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 17Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E., Hall, J.W. et al., Multi-hazard risk to global port infrastructure and resulting trade and logistics losses, Communications Earth and Environment 4, 2023 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 14Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J. and Rozenberg, J., Lifelines: The Resilient Infrastructure Opportunity. World Bank, Washington, 2019 (full report PDF). Observation year 2019 (analysis of earlier data). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 11WHO (ed.), Global status report on road safety 2023, Geneva, 13 December 2023 (publication page). World Health Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 10ITU (ed.), Measuring digital development: Facts and Figures 2026 (publication page with key findings). International Telecommunication Union, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 21Global Infrastructure Hub (ed.), Global Infrastructure Outlook, press release of 25 July 2017 (USD 94 trillion need to 2040, USD 97 trillion with SDG access targets, USD 18 trillion unfunded). Global Infrastructure Hub, Sydney. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 16Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Systemic risks from climate-related disruptions at ports, Nature Climate Change 13, 804 to 806, 2023 (abstract and introduction opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 5UN DESA Statistics Division (ed.), The Sustainable Development Goals Extended Report 2026, Goal 9 indicator storylines (inputs as of 30 April 2026). United Nations, New York. Observation year 2024 (indicators 9.1.2 and 9.a.1) and 2025 (indicator 9.c.1). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 3UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz shipping disruptions raise risks for energy, fertilisers and vulnerable economies, media alert UNCTAD/PRESS/MA/2026/003, Geneva, 10 March 2026. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Infrastructure is what the other systems travel on

Part I describes systems and their couplings. It ranks no country or operator and assesses no authority.

6 min read2 figures1 table15 notesNR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

1.1The questions this part answers

Key questions

  • Where is infrastructure and logistics risk concentrated?
  • Which couplings carry infrastructure and logistics shocks into other systems?
  • Which infrastructure and logistics capabilities hold under compound stress?
  • What must 2027 evidence measure first?

In this part

  • Narrative
  • Headline finding
  • Lead figure
  • Five coupling chapters
  • Twelve-domain reading
  • Sector screens
  • Dependency matrix
  • Risk objects
  • Capability ladder
  • Scenario
  • Three lenses
  • Portfolio

1.2The argument

Infrastructure is usually reported as assets: ports, roads, rail, cables. The 2026 evidence reads it as the route by which almost every other system’s shock arrives. Fuel, fertiliser, food, medicines and data all move on networks whose failure is felt downstream21014.

The load is growing and the routes are lengthening. Seaborne trade reached 12,720 million tons in 2024 and the average haul grew by about 9% from 20181. Container ports handled 913 million TEU6. Infrastructure also shapes the Sustainable Development Goals: it influences 72% of the targets19.

Chokepoints are the sharpest pressure. Daily transits through the Strait of Hormuz fell by 97% in early March 20262, while Suez tonnage stayed 70% below its 2023 average in 20251. Neither is a container story first: Hormuz carried an estimated 3% of container trade and 38% of crude oil volumes2.

Hazards and neglect are the slower risk. About 27% of road and rail assets are exposed to a hazard15, most ports face several17, and the Key Bridge collapse showed how a missing vulnerability assessment can turn one failure into many22. The investment evidence is dated, and the 2017 outlook is the latest global need estimate found21.

Figure 1.1How exposed are the world’s transport assets? Share exposed to hazards (%)

Exposure is common and loss is concentrated. Global expected damage to road and rail is small against world output at about 0.02% of GDP, but in some countries it reaches 0.5 to 1% of GDP a year, the same order as national transport budgets15. Small island economies carry the highest trade risk at ports1718.

ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
Ports exposed to more than three hazards86
Road and rail assets exposed to at least one hazard27
Road and rail assets exposed to a 1-in-100-year flood7.5

Source: as cited in the note to this figure. Year 2023.

Figure ID FIG-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-01-003

3.1 to 22USD billion

expected annual damage to road and rail15

7.5USD billion

port-specific risk a year, multi-hazard17

63.1USD billion

trade at risk a year, multi-hazard17

81USD billion

trade at risk a year, climate-related downtime16

1.3Twenty couplings between five systems

The infrastructure and logistics-centred matrix types the twenty couplings between the five core systems, read for their infrastructure and logistics content. Strengths are Nexus estimates (ESTIMATED) from the cited evidence and analogue events; they set the graph that 2027 evidence will test.

Figure 1.2Couplings between the five systems

Each line is one coupling from one system to another, drawn by the strength the edition assigns. Strengths are Nexus estimates from the cited evidence and analogue events.

  • Strong
  • Moderate
  • Weak

Source: this edition’s coupling matrix (Table 1.1); status Estimated.

Table 1.1Coupling matrix: from the row system to the column system
From, toWATENEFOOHLTBIO
WAT Water·STRONG
river and canal freight of fuel · cooling
MODERATE
inland freight of grain
WEAK
services at stations and ports
MODERATE
dredging · canal works
ENE EnergyMODERATE
pumping · lock operation
·STRONG
haulage fuel · cold chain power
STRONG
fuel and power for clinics and ambulances
WEAK
fuel spills · port emissions
FOO FoodWEAK
freight on waterways
WEAK
biofuel shipping
·MODERATE
shared cold chain and roads
WEAK
land for corridors
HLT HealthWEAK
workforce
WEAK
workforce
WEAK
labour
·WEAK
waste
BIO BiodiversityWEAK
siltation
WEAK
biomass freight
MODERATE
pests carried by trade
MODERATE
pathogens along routes
·
Strength: strong, moderate or weak; a Nexus estimate (status Estimated) from cited evidence and analogue events. The scale is defined in Annex A.

Transmission paths

  1. 01

    ENE → FOO

    Fuel and fertiliser freight is interrupted at a chokepoint and reaches farms and food prices.

    Reported 2026 Hormuz disruption23

  2. 02

    CLI → INF → TRD

    Storms and heat close ports and routes, and delay trade.

    Reported port downtime studies1617

  3. 03

    INF → HLT

    A failed link cuts access to care and supplies, and crashes injure people.

    Reported Key Bridge 202422; road deaths11

  4. 04

    TRD → FIN

    A chokepoint closure lifts freight, fuel and insurance costs for importers.

    Reported 2026 bunker and war-risk costs2

  5. 05

    DAT → INF

    A cyber incident halts operations at ports, rail or airlines.

    Reported 2021 to 2022 incidents23

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 2UNCTAD (ed.), Strait of Hormuz Disruptions: Implications for Global Trade and Development, rapid analysis dated 10 March 2026, from Clarksons Research, EIA, LSEG, Kpler and other data. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 10ITU (ed.), Measuring digital development: Facts and Figures 2026 (publication page with key findings). International Telecommunication Union, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 14Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J. and Rozenberg, J., Lifelines: The Resilient Infrastructure Opportunity. World Bank, Washington, 2019 (full report PDF). Observation year 2019 (analysis of earlier data). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025: Staying the course in turbulent waters (full report and overview). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 6DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, container port traffic (TEU), series IS.SHP.GOOD.TU, API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 19Thacker, S. et al., Infrastructure for sustainable development, Nature Sustainability 2, 324 to 331, 2019 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 15Koks, E.E. et al., A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets, Nature Communications 10, 2677, 2019 (abstract via Crossref). Springer Nature. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 17Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E., Hall, J.W. et al., Multi-hazard risk to global port infrastructure and resulting trade and logistics losses, Communications Earth and Environment 4, 2023 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 22NTSB (ed.), Contact of Containership Dali with Francis Scott Key Bridge and Subsequent Bridge Collapse, investigation page with probable cause and recommendations. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 21Global Infrastructure Hub (ed.), Global Infrastructure Outlook, press release of 25 July 2017 (USD 94 trillion need to 2040, USD 97 trillion with SDG access targets, USD 18 trillion unfunded). Global Infrastructure Hub, Sydney. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 18Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Ports’ criticality in international trade and global supply-chains, Nature Communications 13, 2022 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 16Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Systemic risks from climate-related disruptions at ports, Nature Climate Change 13, 804 to 806, 2023 (abstract and introduction opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 3UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz shipping disruptions raise risks for energy, fertilisers and vulnerable economies, media alert UNCTAD/PRESS/MA/2026/003, Geneva, 10 March 2026. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 11WHO (ed.), Global status report on road safety 2023, Geneva, 13 December 2023 (publication page). World Health Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 23ENISA (ed.), ENISA Transport Threat Landscape, March 2023 (publication page and report PDF; incidents January 2021 to October 2022). European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, Athens. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Key findings

Twelve findings carry the infrastructure and logistics baseline. They are grouped by coupling and never ranked. Each resolves to its source or, where Nexus analysis is involved, to its stated method.

6 min read1 figure0 tables17 notesNR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

2.1Headline finding

ReportedEQL 4NRF-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-TRD-002

Daily ship transits through the Strait of Hormuz averaged 129 on 1 to 27 February 2026 and fell by 97% in early March.

Figure 2.1Daily ship transits through the Strait of Hormuz
ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
Average, 1 to 27 February 2026129
Early March 2026, about (derived from the 97% fall)4

Source: UNCTAD, Strait of Hormuz Disruptions, 10 March 2026, from Clarksons Research data2. The early March value is the editors’ derivation (method 2).

Implication

The strait carried about 20 million barrels of oil a day in 2024. UNCTAD put this at 25% of seaborne oil trade in March 2026, and its 2025 Review gave about 34% of seaborne oil exports and 11% of maritime trade. Around one third of seaborne fertiliser trade, about 16 million tonnes, also passes through it213.

What would move it

The next UNCTAD tracking of transits, the Review of Maritime Transport 2026 and the monthly shipping reports would each move this finding.

2.2Trade

  1. ReportedEQL 5NRF-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-TRD-001

    Maritime trade volumes reached 12,720 million tons in 2024, up 2.2%, and ton-miles rose 5.9% because ships rerouted; the average haul grew from 4,831 miles in 2018 to 5,245 miles in 2024.15

  2. ReportedEQL 4NRF-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-TRD-002

    Daily ship transits through the Strait of Hormuz averaged 129 on 1 to 27 February 2026 and fell by 97% in early March; the strait carried about 20 million barrels of oil a day in 2024, 25% of seaborne oil trade in the March analysis and over one third of seaborne oil exports in the 2025 Review.241

  3. ReportedEQL 4NRF-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-TRD-003

    Ship tonnage through the Suez Canal remained 70% below the 2023 average in early May 2025, and the Shanghai Containerized Freight Index averaged 2,496 points in 2024, up 149%.1

  4. ReportedEQL 4NRF-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-TRD-006

    Climate-related downtime at 1,320 ports puts USD 81 billion of trade and at least USD 122 billion of economic activity at risk each year; a multi-hazard analysis finds 86% of ports exposed to more than three hazards and USD 63.1 billion of trade at risk each year.161718

2.3Infrastructure

  1. ReportedEQL 3NRF-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-004

    Infrastructure disruption costs households and firms in low- and middle-income countries USD 391 to 647 billion a year, against USD 18 billion a year of direct damage to power and transport assets, in a 2019 estimate.14

  2. ReportedEQL 4NRF-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-005

    About 27% of global road and rail assets are exposed to at least one hazard and about 7.5% to a 1-in-100-year flood; expected annual direct damage is USD 3.1 to 22 billion, about 73% from flooding.15

  3. ReportedEQL 5NRF-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-011

    The NTSB found that a loose wire connection caused a blackout on the containership Dali, which struck the Key Bridge on 26 March 2024; lack of a vulnerability assessment contributed to the collapse, six workers died and over 34,000 vehicles a day lost the route.22

2.4Finance

  1. ReportedEQL 3NRF-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-FIN-007

    The 2017 Global Infrastructure Outlook put the need to 2040 at USD 94 trillion, USD 97 trillion with the SDG access targets, with USD 18 trillion unfunded; official flows for infrastructure in developing countries reached USD 78.7 billion in 2024, of which USD 26.7 billion went to transport.215

2.5Health

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-HLT-008

    Road traffic crashes killed 1.19 million people in 2021, 92% of deaths fall in low- and middle-income countries, and more than half are pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists; a WHO fact sheet of July 2026 gives 1.16 million without a reference year.1112

2.6Data and digital

  1. ReportedEQL 5NRF-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-DAT-009

    6.3 billion people (76%) use the Internet in 2026 and 2 billion do not; use is 93% in high-income and 32% in low-income countries, and 3G or better covers 96% of people.1058

2.7Energy

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-ENE-010

    Electric car sales reached 21 million in 2025, one in four cars sold; electric heavy trucks in China passed 200 000 units; oil use for aviation rose 3.6% while gasoline and diesel demand were virtually unchanged.13

2.8Systemic

  1. Expert inputEQL 2NRF-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-SYS-012

    The leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is a chokepoint closure that coincides with weather-driven port downtime and an operational cyber incident at a major hub. § scenario

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 2UNCTAD (ed.), Strait of Hormuz Disruptions: Implications for Global Trade and Development, rapid analysis dated 10 March 2026, from Clarksons Research, EIA, LSEG, Kpler and other data. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025: Staying the course in turbulent waters (full report and overview). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 3UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz shipping disruptions raise risks for energy, fertilisers and vulnerable economies, media alert UNCTAD/PRESS/MA/2026/003, Geneva, 10 March 2026. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 5UN DESA Statistics Division (ed.), The Sustainable Development Goals Extended Report 2026, Goal 9 indicator storylines (inputs as of 30 April 2026). United Nations, New York. Observation year 2024 (indicators 9.1.2 and 9.a.1) and 2025 (indicator 9.c.1). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 4UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption shows why early-warning data matters, news item (about 95% fall in ship transits; tracking tool described). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 16Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Systemic risks from climate-related disruptions at ports, Nature Climate Change 13, 804 to 806, 2023 (abstract and introduction opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 17Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E., Hall, J.W. et al., Multi-hazard risk to global port infrastructure and resulting trade and logistics losses, Communications Earth and Environment 4, 2023 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 18Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Ports’ criticality in international trade and global supply-chains, Nature Communications 13, 2022 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 14Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J. and Rozenberg, J., Lifelines: The Resilient Infrastructure Opportunity. World Bank, Washington, 2019 (full report PDF). Observation year 2019 (analysis of earlier data). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 15Koks, E.E. et al., A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets, Nature Communications 10, 2677, 2019 (abstract via Crossref). Springer Nature. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 22NTSB (ed.), Contact of Containership Dali with Francis Scott Key Bridge and Subsequent Bridge Collapse, investigation page with probable cause and recommendations. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 21Global Infrastructure Hub (ed.), Global Infrastructure Outlook, press release of 25 July 2017 (USD 94 trillion need to 2040, USD 97 trillion with SDG access targets, USD 18 trillion unfunded). Global Infrastructure Hub, Sydney. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 11WHO (ed.), Global status report on road safety 2023, Geneva, 13 December 2023 (publication page). World Health Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 12WHO (ed.), Road traffic injuries, fact sheet updated 20 July 2026 (about 1.16 million deaths a year; 92% in low- and middle-income countries; reference year not stated). World Health Organization, Geneva. Observation year not stated on the page. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 10ITU (ed.), Measuring digital development: Facts and Figures 2026 (publication page with key findings). International Telecommunication Union, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 8DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, individuals using the Internet (series IT.NET.USER.ZS, ITU source), API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 13IEA (ed.), Global Energy Review 2026 (PDF, opened from a copy of the published report hosted by a third party). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Systems and sectors at baseline

6 min read0 figures2 tables19 notesNR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

3.1Where each system stood at evidence close

TRD · Trade

Seaborne trade volume

12,720million tons

up 2.2%; ton-miles up 5.9%.

Reported2024UNCTAD1

TRD · Chokepoints

Fall in daily Hormuz ship transits

97%

129 a day in February 2026 to about 4.

Reported2026UNCTAD2

INF · Resilience

Disruption cost in low- and middle-income countries

391 to 647USD billion a year

a 2019 estimate.

Reported2019World Bank14

HLT · Health

Road traffic deaths

1.19million

a WHO fact sheet of July 2026 gives 1.16 million.

Reported2021WHO1112

DAT · Connectivity

People using the Internet

6.3billion

and 2 billion remain offline.

Reported2026ITU10

SYS · Cross-system

Trade at risk each year from climate-related port downtime

81USD billion

modelled across 1,320 ports.

Reported2023Verschuur et al.16

3.2Domain posture

Each of the twelve coupled domains is read through infrastructure and logistics, in words, not scored. The coupling column names the dependency that carries infrastructure and logistics risk into each domain.

Table 3.1Each domain read in words, not scored
DomainPosture at baselineCouplingStatus
WATCanals, rivers and ports depend on water levels and flows; flooding is the largest source of road and rail damage; volumes of water used by transport are not consolidated here.INF ↔ WATReported EQL 4
ENETransport runs on fuel and increasingly on power: electric cars 21 million in 2025, aviation oil use up 3.6%.ENE → INFReported EQL 4
FOOAbout one third of seaborne fertiliser trade passed through Hormuz; ports and cold chains carry food; no consolidated cold-chain series here.INF → FOOReported EQL 3
HLTRoad crashes killed 1.19 million people in 2021; access to clinics and supplies rides on roads and networks.INF → HLTReported EQL 4
BIODredging, corridors and shipping press on habitats; the evidence is not consolidated here.INF → BIOExpert input EQL 2
CLIHeat, floods and storms disrupt networks; 2025 was about 1.43 °C above the pre-industrial average.CLI → INFReported EQL 4
INFThe core system: ports, shipping lanes, roads, bridges, rail and aviation, with exposure to hazards, ageing and sudden structural failure.the core systemReported EQL 5
FINA 2017 outlook put the need to 2040 at USD 94 trillion; official flows to developing countries reached USD 78.7 billion in 2024.FIN → INFReported EQL 3
DAT6.3 billion people online in 2026; 96% covered by 3G or better; operational data on transport are uneven.DAT ↔ INFReported EQL 4
AICCompute and automation are entering ports and logistics; no consolidated figure is used in this edition.AIC → INFExpert input EQL 1
MINTransport equipment, batteries and vehicles depend on mineral supply; the evidence is bound with SR-04.MIN → INFExpert input EQL 2
TRDSeaborne trade 12,720 million tons; Hormuz transits fell 97%; Suez tonnage 70% below the 2023 average.INF ↔ TRDReported EQL 5

3.3Sector screens

All sixteen sectors are screened for their dependence on infrastructure and logistics, on the same grammar as every national edition. The evidence column describes coverage of the baseline evidence, not the performance of the sector.

Table 3.2Sectors: baseline evidence and the exposure to watch
CodeSectorBaseline evidenceExposure to watchEvidence coverage
GS-00Cross-systeminfrastructure carries every other system’s flows1419chokepoint, port and cyber compoundPARTIAL
GS-01Waterfloods and canal levels limit routes1532flood and low-flow disruptionTHIN
GS-02Energyelectric cars 21 million in 202513fuel and power for transportPARTIAL
GS-03Foodone third of seaborne fertiliser trade via Hormuz2fuel and fertiliser freightPARTIAL
GS-04Health1.19 million road deaths in 202111access to care and suppliesGOOD
GS-05FinanceUSD 94 trillion need to 2040 in 201721investment and insurancePARTIAL
GS-06DevelopmentUSD 78.7 billion of official flows in 20245access to roads and networksPARTIAL
GS-07Climate2025 about 1.43 °C above pre-industrial31heat and storm disruptionPARTIAL
GS-08Disasterdisasters damage and disrupt networks14cascading transport failuresPARTIAL
GS-09Infrastructureseaborne trade 12,720 million tons1chokepoints and exposureGOOD
GS-10Cities57.8% of people live in cities in 20259urban access and congestionTHIN
GS-11Biodiversityport and corridor pressures on habitatsdredging and land useTHIN
GS-12Earth observationship tracking and hazard data support operations2continuity of data feedsTHIN
GS-13Cyber and digital98 reported incidents in transport, 2021 to 202223attacks on transport operationsPARTIAL
GS-14PolicyEU network and resilience rules2425implementation and diversion rulesPARTIAL
GS-15Sciencestrong port and network risk modelling1617asset condition dataPARTIAL

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025: Staying the course in turbulent waters (full report and overview). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 2UNCTAD (ed.), Strait of Hormuz Disruptions: Implications for Global Trade and Development, rapid analysis dated 10 March 2026, from Clarksons Research, EIA, LSEG, Kpler and other data. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 14Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J. and Rozenberg, J., Lifelines: The Resilient Infrastructure Opportunity. World Bank, Washington, 2019 (full report PDF). Observation year 2019 (analysis of earlier data). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 11WHO (ed.), Global status report on road safety 2023, Geneva, 13 December 2023 (publication page). World Health Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 12WHO (ed.), Road traffic injuries, fact sheet updated 20 July 2026 (about 1.16 million deaths a year; 92% in low- and middle-income countries; reference year not stated). World Health Organization, Geneva. Observation year not stated on the page. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 10ITU (ed.), Measuring digital development: Facts and Figures 2026 (publication page with key findings). International Telecommunication Union, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 16Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Systemic risks from climate-related disruptions at ports, Nature Climate Change 13, 804 to 806, 2023 (abstract and introduction opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 19Thacker, S. et al., Infrastructure for sustainable development, Nature Sustainability 2, 324 to 331, 2019 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 15Koks, E.E. et al., A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets, Nature Communications 10, 2677, 2019 (abstract via Crossref). Springer Nature. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 32Autoridad del Canal de Panama (ed.), Panama Canal Authority, home page statistics (13,404 transits in 2025). Panama Canal Authority, Balboa. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 13IEA (ed.), Global Energy Review 2026 (PDF, opened from a copy of the published report hosted by a third party). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 21Global Infrastructure Hub (ed.), Global Infrastructure Outlook, press release of 25 July 2017 (USD 94 trillion need to 2040, USD 97 trillion with SDG access targets, USD 18 trillion unfunded). Global Infrastructure Hub, Sydney. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 5UN DESA Statistics Division (ed.), The Sustainable Development Goals Extended Report 2026, Goal 9 indicator storylines (inputs as of 30 April 2026). United Nations, New York. Observation year 2024 (indicators 9.1.2 and 9.a.1) and 2025 (indicator 9.c.1). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 31WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, press release of 23 March 2026 (2025 about 1.43 °C above the 1850 to 1900 average). World Meteorological Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 9DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, urban population as a share of total population (series SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS, UN source), API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 23ENISA (ed.), ENISA Transport Threat Landscape, March 2023 (publication page and report PDF; incidents January 2021 to October 2022). European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, Athens. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 24European Commission (ed.), Trans-European transport network (TEN-T), policy page on Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 (core network by 2030, extended core by 2040, comprehensive by 2050). Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 25European Commission (ed.), NIS2 Directive: securing network and information systems, policy page on Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (earlier directive repealed from 18 October 2024). Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 17Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E., Hall, J.W. et al., Multi-hazard risk to global port infrastructure and resulting trade and logistics losses, Communications Earth and Environment 4, 2023 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Risks and capability

Four infrastructure and logistics risk objects open the portfolio. Order carries no rank. Each is read across driver, exposure, vulnerability, capacity, cascade and consequence.

5 min read0 figures1 table19 notesNR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

4.1Risk objects

Each risk is read across the chain from hazard to consequence, with its status and evidence-quality level.

  1. ReportedEQL 4RSK-GS09-TRD-001

    Maritime chokepoint closure

    Driver
    military escalation or blockage at a strait or canal21
    Exposure
    importing economies, tanker and container trades, fertiliser users
    Vulnerability
    few bypass routes; long rerouting around the Cape of Good Hope1
    Capacity
    rerouting, stock holding and insurance markets
    Cascade
    TRD → ENE, FOO, FIN
    Horizon
    1 to 3 years
  2. ReportedEQL 4RSK-GS09-INF-002

    Port and coastal hazard downtime

    Driver
    tropical cyclones, extreme wind, flooding and sea level rise161731
    Exposure
    86% of ports face more than three hazards17; island economies most reliant18
    Vulnerability
    engineering standards and recovery times vary widely17
    Capacity
    protection works, operating thresholds and backup ports
    Cascade
    INF → TRD, FIN, FOO
    Horizon
    1 to 10 years
  3. InferredEQL 3RSK-GS09-INF-003

    Ageing and unassessed structures

    Driver
    deferred maintenance and impact risk from vessels2220
    Exposure
    bridges and approaches near ports and shipping lanes
    Vulnerability
    missing vulnerability assessments22; investment gaps20
    Capacity
    inspection, retrofit and emergency detour plans
    Cascade
    INF → HLT, TRD
    Horizon
    1 to 10 years
  4. InferredEQL 3RSK-GS09-DAT-004

    Cyber disruption of transport operations

    Driver
    ransomware and data-related threats against transport operators23
    Exposure
    airlines, port authorities, rail operators and vehicle makers
    Vulnerability
    shared suppliers and operational technology; limited incident reporting23
    Capacity
    incident reporting duties and operator preparedness25
    Cascade
    DAT → INF → TRD, HLT
    Horizon
    1 to 5 years

4.2Capability ladder

Existence is not readiness. Each of the fifteen capability functions is placed on the ladder by the strongest public evidence for infrastructure and logistics at the global level.

Table 4.1Capabilities on the ladder of evidence: listed, exists, demonstrated, tested
FunctionRungLevelStrongest public evidence at baseline
Prevention and mitigationEXISTSdesign standards and hazard protection widespread; implementation uneven1417
Monitoring and observationADEQUATEvessel and port data strong where reported; asset condition data thin220
Early warningEXISTSweather warnings and shipping advisories; chokepoint early warning is partial4
Preparedness and planningEXISTSnetwork planning and resilience rules in the EU2439
Redundancy and reservesDEMONSTRATEDrerouting around the Cape of Good Hope sustained trade1
ResponseDEMONSTRATEDrerouting, advisories and emergency measures used in 2024 and 2026132
Continuity of critical servicesEXISTSpriority freight and passenger rules exist; testing uneven
RecoveryLISTEDrecovery times by port and asset are not consolidated17
AdaptationEXISTSprotection and fleet changes under way; fleet greening incremental130
Social protectionLISTEDsupport for transport-poor households documented but not consolidated
Finance and insuranceEXISTSUSD 78.7 billion of official flows in 2024; war-risk premiums repriced in 202652
Institutional coordinationEXISTSIMO conventions and EU network rules2624
Technical infrastructureEXISTSports and networks extensive; maintenance gaps reported2014
WorkforceLISTEDseafarer and driver supply not reviewed in this edition
Research capacityADEQUATEstrong port and network risk science; asset data access uneven1619
A capability listed in policy is not a tested one; each rung is the strongest public evidence at baseline.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 2UNCTAD (ed.), Strait of Hormuz Disruptions: Implications for Global Trade and Development, rapid analysis dated 10 March 2026, from Clarksons Research, EIA, LSEG, Kpler and other data. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025: Staying the course in turbulent waters (full report and overview). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 16Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Systemic risks from climate-related disruptions at ports, Nature Climate Change 13, 804 to 806, 2023 (abstract and introduction opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 17Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E., Hall, J.W. et al., Multi-hazard risk to global port infrastructure and resulting trade and logistics losses, Communications Earth and Environment 4, 2023 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 31WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, press release of 23 March 2026 (2025 about 1.43 °C above the 1850 to 1900 average). World Meteorological Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 18Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Ports’ criticality in international trade and global supply-chains, Nature Communications 13, 2022 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 22NTSB (ed.), Contact of Containership Dali with Francis Scott Key Bridge and Subsequent Bridge Collapse, investigation page with probable cause and recommendations. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 20ASCE (ed.), 2025 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure (summary page: overall grade C, grades from B in ports to D in stormwater and transit, USD 3.6 trillion investment gap over ten years). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 23ENISA (ed.), ENISA Transport Threat Landscape, March 2023 (publication page and report PDF; incidents January 2021 to October 2022). European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, Athens. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 25European Commission (ed.), NIS2 Directive: securing network and information systems, policy page on Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (earlier directive repealed from 18 October 2024). Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 14Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J. and Rozenberg, J., Lifelines: The Resilient Infrastructure Opportunity. World Bank, Washington, 2019 (full report PDF). Observation year 2019 (analysis of earlier data). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 4UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption shows why early-warning data matters, news item (about 95% fall in ship transits; tracking tool described). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 24European Commission (ed.), Trans-European transport network (TEN-T), policy page on Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 (core network by 2030, extended core by 2040, comprehensive by 2050). Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Directive (EU) 2022/2557 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the resilience of critical entities, Official Journal of the European Union, 2022; the legal text returned a challenge page and the transport scope is cited from a search summary. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 32Autoridad del Canal de Panama (ed.), Panama Canal Authority, home page statistics (13,404 transits in 2025). Panama Canal Authority, Balboa. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 30IPCC, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Working Group II, Chapter 6: Cities, Settlements and Key Infrastructure (chapter PDF opened). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 5UN DESA Statistics Division (ed.), The Sustainable Development Goals Extended Report 2026, Goal 9 indicator storylines (inputs as of 30 April 2026). United Nations, New York. Observation year 2024 (indicators 9.1.2 and 9.a.1) and 2025 (indicator 9.c.1). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 26IMO (ed.), Initial IMO GHG Strategy, hot topic page (notes that the 2023 strategy has been adopted). International Maritime Organization, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 19Thacker, S. et al., Infrastructure for sustainable development, Nature Sustainability 2, 324 to 331, 2019 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Chokepoint closure with port downtime and a cyber incident

A conditional statement under stated assumptions, never a prediction.

2 min read0 figures0 tables3 notesNR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

5.1Assumptions

Scenario SCN-GS09-HRM-01: what is assumed, and what is held constant.

Baseline
the 2026 reference state in this edition
Drivers
a closure of a major strait or canal that coincides with weather-driven downtime at a large port and an operational cyber incident at a major hub
Analogues
the 2026 Hormuz disruption; Suez tonnage in 2024 and 2025; the 2021 to 2022 transport incidents2123
Interventions
none modelled: the specification describes the unmitigated case
Run state
narrative specification; quantified run scheduled for 2027

5.2The cascade, step by step

  1. 1

    TRD → ENE

    transits through a chokepoint fall; tanker and bunker costs rise

    2026

  2. 2

    CLI → INF

    a storm or heat event closes a large port while diversions pile up

    2023

  3. 3

    DAT → INF

    a cyber incident halts scheduling at a hub

    2022

  4. 4

    INF → FOO

    fertiliser and food freight are delayed and costs pass through

    2026

  5. 5

    INF → HLT

    supplies and access to care slow; crashes rise on diverted roads

    2024

  6. 6

    TRD → FIN

    freight, insurance and import bills strain budgets

    2026

5.3The scenario as a table of steps

How the shock in scenario SCN-GS09-HRM-01 would travel through Global Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics’s coupled systems, step by step, under the assumptions the edition states.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Trade to energyTransits through a chokepoint fall; tanker and bunker costs rise. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition GS-09, scenario SCN-GS09-HRM-01, step 1
02 Climate to infrastructureA storm or heat event closes a large port while diversions pile up. Analogue or source: 2023.Edition GS-09, scenario SCN-GS09-HRM-01, step 2
03 DAT to infrastructureA cyber incident halts scheduling at a hub. Analogue or source: 2022.Edition GS-09, scenario SCN-GS09-HRM-01, step 3
04 Infrastructure to foodFertiliser and food freight are delayed and costs pass through. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition GS-09, scenario SCN-GS09-HRM-01, step 4
05 Infrastructure to healthSupplies and access to care slow; crashes rise on diverted roads. Analogue or source: 2024.Edition GS-09, scenario SCN-GS09-HRM-01, step 5
06 Trade to financeFreight, insurance and import bills strain budgets. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition GS-09, scenario SCN-GS09-HRM-01, step 6

A teaching model of a conditional scenario under the edition’s stated assumptions: not a forecast, not a prediction and not a warning. Sources: Global Infrastructure and Logistics 2026, scenario SCN-GS09-HRM-01 (2026); Global Infrastructure and Logistics 2026, references (NR-CIT-1) (2026).

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 2UNCTAD (ed.), Strait of Hormuz Disruptions: Implications for Global Trade and Development, rapid analysis dated 10 March 2026, from Clarksons Research, EIA, LSEG, Kpler and other data. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025: Staying the course in turbulent waters (full report and overview). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 23ENISA (ed.), ENISA Transport Threat Landscape, March 2023 (publication page and report PDF; incidents January 2021 to October 2022). European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, Athens. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Readings from the other desks

The infrastructure and logistics baseline is read through each steward’s lens, then once as a whole. Each lens is a projection of reviewed findings, not a separate argument. The other desks’ own editions of this subject are listed first, as cross-references, not copies.

16 min read0 figures8 tables43 notesNR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

6.1The other desks’ editions of this subject

Federation: each desk writes its own edition for the subjects in its remit. Until a desk releases, its edition shows its frame and the reading this edition printed for it.

DeskEditionStateIdentifier
GCRI Systems EvidenceNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
GRF Public DeliberationOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
GRA Capital ReadinessNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
Standards ProgressNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
Academy CapabilityNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
Index MeasurementOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit

6.2Three lenses

One edition, read by each steward. The lens of this site comes first.

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports reading infrastructure as the carrier layer of the WEFH+B system. Trade volumes are high, routes are longer and chokepoints can fail within days. Evidence is strongest for trade, ports and road deaths, and weakest for asset condition and recovery times.

TRD-001 · TRD-002 · INF-004 · SYS-012

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people infrastructure risk arrives as a delayed delivery, a closed road or a dropped connection. The baseline asks that public debate treat transport and logistics as shared infrastructure for health and food, and keep the 1.19 million road deaths and the 2 billion people offline in view.

HLT-008 · DAT-009 · TRD-002

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. The need estimate is dated, port and network risks are modelled in the hundreds of billions, and freight and insurance costs repriced in 202621162. These show where finance-readiness evidence will matter. Nothing here is advice, a rating or an approval.

FIN-007 · TRD-006

NEXUS

Synthesis

Infrastructure is well measured at the level of trade volumes and port traffic and thinly measured at the level of asset condition, maintenance and recovery. The 2027 programme should test the compound chokepoint case, bind regional corridor evidence and build the condition register.

SYS-012 · L-01 · L-02

6.3Standards, Academy and steward contributions

How the Nexus Standards drafts, the Risk Academy and the three stewards feed each quarterly edition for infrastructure and logistics. The standards are a preparatory working draft (2026) and are cited as drafts, never as adopted standards.

Table 6.1The quarterly rhythm every edition follows
QuarterEditionQuestionBoundary
Q1State and AgendaWhat matters this year, and what is the starting position?observed baseline stays distinct from planned work
Q2Evidence and BuildWhat new evidence and capability exist?a configured capability is not a validated result
Q3Stress Test and ReadinessWhat do scenarios and tests show?simulated loss or performance is not observed impact
Q4Annual Synthesis and RenewalWhat changed in the year, and what renews?release follows review, not event publicity deadlines
Table 6.2Who contributes what each quarter
Steward or bodyRoleContribution route
GCRI CanadaLead Institution and Consortium Secretariat; publisher of record; technical truth (key T)science and practice communities · GCRI gateway
The Global Risks Forum (GRF)leadership, dialogue and the Universe programme; public meaning (key M)policy, Universe and national adoption · GRF gateway
The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)finance, insurance and development readiness; capital meaning (key F)finance and insurance · GRA gateway
Nexus Standardspreparatory drafts on vocabulary, hazards, indicators and methodsStandards site · working groups HAZ, IND, MTH, FIN, AI
Risk Academylearning pathways tied to the agenda questionsAcademy gateway · learning by review
Reports sector desksinfrastructure chapter inputs: GCRI evidence, GRA readiness, NXS standards, RA capabilitysector editorial board

Standards drafts used in this edition

  • Risk vocabulary NRS-C1 (424 terms) for terms in the glossary
  • Hazard atlas NHS-1 1.1.0 (905 hazards in 120 families) for risk objects
  • Seven risk classes: global, catastrophic, existential, emerging, planetary, exponential, frontier-tech

Standards calendar to watch

  • Founding calls from 20 October 2026; working groups meet from 5 November 2026
  • Inaugural Global Standards Council session, 12 January 2027
  • Quarterly reviews in March, June, September and December, aligned with each edition

6.4GCRI reading: the model card

GCRI’s reading of this edition is its model card: what the national model is, what it computes and where it stops. It is printed in full in Annex A, with the methods it belongs to. Annex A, methodology

6.5Global Risks Forum reading: editorial essays

Four signed essays by the Reports editorial team set out the positions this edition takes. They are interpretation, labelled as such; the evidence they draw on is in the findings register.

Every recent shock has travelled on a network: fuel on tankers, fertiliser on bulk ships, data on cables and medicines on roads. Treating infrastructure as a list of assets understates how it moves risk between systems. This edition asks where a failed link sends the shock next.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 01

Infrastructure is a carrier, not a sector

The average voyage grew from 4,831 to 5,245 miles between 2018 and 2024 and ton-miles grew almost three times faster than volumes in 2024. Longer routes mean more fuel, more days and more exposure. Measuring distance as well as tonnage is the first adaptation.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 02

Distance is a hidden cost

Global expected damage to road and rail is small against output, but reaches 0.5 to 1% of GDP in some countries, and island economies depend most on their ports. The risk is a matter of where an economy has no second route.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 03

Hazards fall unevenly

Missing vulnerability assessments, dated investment estimates and thin condition data are quieter than a closed strait. They decide how large the next failure will be. Closing them is part of resilience.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 04

The slow gaps matter

6.6Global Risks Alliance reading: 2027 infrastructure and logistics readiness pack

The registers that open the 2027 global cycle. At baseline each is initialised from this edition.

Table 6.32027 infrastructure and logistics readiness pack
ItemRegisterState at baselineFirst 2027 entry
E1Infrastructure and Logistics risk state deltabaseline set by this editionchanges against the baseline
E2WEFH+B state deltafive global system readings setindicator updates and freshness
E3Agenda and Portfolio movementeight agenda items · 6 proposed objectsadmission decisions
E4Federation delivery registernational chapters in preparationnational chapters
E5Consortium capability registernational consortia formingfirst contributions
E6Leadership questions and challengesnone yetfirst challenge log
E7Foundry technical statenational environments preparedfirst federation cut
E8Publication candidatestwelve findings carried forwardPUBLISH · HOLD dispositions
E9Universe readinessone candidate missionadmission and role spine
E10Correction registernonefirst federation-wide cycle

Publication dispositions

  • Publish
  • Hold
  • Needs evidence
  • Restricted
  • Superseded

6.7Nexus Standards reading: standards and regulatory watch

Instruments and published guidance that shape the systems in this edition, by status on the retrieval date. Nexus Standards texts that relate to this edition are cited as preparatory working draft (2026). The edition assesses no one’s compliance.

  • IN FORCE
  • ADOPTED
  • DEFERRED
  • PUBLISHED · VOLUNTARY
Table 6.4Standards and regulatory watch
InstrumentBodyScopeStatusRelevance
Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 on the trans-European transport network24European UnionEUIN FORCEnetwork completion
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, NIS225European UnionEUIN FORCEcybersecurity
Directive (EU) 2022/2557 on the resilience of critical entities39European UnionEUIN FORCEresilience
IMO strategy on greenhouse gas emissions from ships26IMOglobalADOPTED 2023shipping emissions
IMO Net-Zero Framework2740IMOglobalADOPTION DEFERRED 2025fuel intensity and pricing
ISO 55000 asset management41ISOglobalPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYassets
ISO 28000 supply chain security management42ISOglobalPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYsupply chains
ISO 22301 business continuity43ISOglobalPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYcontinuity
International Ship and Port Facility Security Code48IMOglobalIN FORCEsecurity

Changed since 2024

  • The IMO meeting of October 2025 deferred adoption of the Net-Zero Framework for one year27
  • NIS2 repealed the earlier network and information security directive from 18 October 202425
  • UNCTAD published a rapid analysis of the Strait of Hormuz on 10 March 20262

To watch in 2027

  • Outcome of the October 2026 IMO session on the Net-Zero Framework40
  • National designation of critical entities in transport under the EU resilience directive39
  • Completion of the core network of the trans-European transport network, due by 203024

6.8Risk Academy reading: literature and evidence review, science and assessments

The review behind this edition covers infrastructure and logistics assessments, peer-reviewed science and the institutional reports that bind its findings. Systematic reviews for each agenda item begin in 2027.

Review protocol

Question
What does the published evidence establish about the world’s infrastructure, transport and logistics systems and its couplings?
Sources searched
agency flagships; regulator and investigation reports; peer-reviewed port and network risk literature; statistics
Window
releases available at evidence close, 30 September 2026
Selection
sources that bind or contextualise a finding in this edition
Next step
systematic reviews for agenda items 01 to 05 in 2027
Table 6.5Peer-reviewed science and assessments
ReferenceTypeYearRoleUsed for
Koks et al.15journal article2019supportsroad and rail exposure
Verschuur et al.18journal article2022supportsport criticality
Verschuur et al.17journal article2023supportsmulti-hazard port risk
Verschuur et al.16journal article2023supportsclimate-related downtime
Thacker et al.19journal article2019frameworkinfrastructure and the SDGs
IPCC AR6 Working Group II, Chapter 630assessment2022contextkey infrastructure and cities
Colon et al.46journal article2020contexttransport network criticality
Verschuur et al.47journal article2020contextport disruption by natural disasters
Table 6.6Institutional flagships
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Review of Maritime Transport 20251UNCTAD2025supportstrade, fleet, chokepoints
Strait of Hormuz Disruptions2UNCTAD2026supportschokepoint shock
Lifelines14World Bank2019supportsdisruption cost
Global status report on road safety 202311WHO2023supportsroad deaths
Facts and Figures 202610ITU2026supportsconnectivity
Global Energy Review 202613IEA2026supportstransport fuels
Review of Maritime Transport 202449UNCTAD2024contextmaritime chokepoints
Transport Outlook 202334ITF at the OECD2023contextdemand and emissions
Resilience Pays36UNDRR2025contextdisaster finance
Table 6.7Statistics, access and finance
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
SDG Extended Report, Goal 95UN DESA2026supportsfreight, finance, coverage
World Development Indicators6789World Bank2026supportsports, air, Internet, urbanisation
Global Infrastructure Outlook21Global Infrastructure Hub2017supportsinvestment need
Infrastructure Report Card20ASCE2025contextUnited States condition
Air travel demand update28ACI World2025supportsairport passengers
Industry outlook29IATA2025supportsairline passengers
Air transport statistics35ICAO2025contextairline passengers
Logistics Performance Index37World Bank2023contextlogistics performance
Table 6.8Regulators, safety and standards
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Key Bridge investigation22NTSB2024supportsstructure failure
Transport Threat Landscape23ENISA2023supportscyber incidents
Trans-European Transport Network24European Commission2026contextnetwork rules
NIS2 Directive25European Commission2026contextcybersecurity duties
Resilience of critical entities directive39European Union2022contextcritical entities
GHG strategy26IMO2023contextshipping emissions
Net-Zero Framework decision2740IMO and DNV2025contextdeferral
ISO 55000, 28000 and 22301414243ISO2019 to 2024contextasset, supply chain and continuity management
ISPS Code48IMO2004contextport and ship security
Rural Access Index50World Bank2023contextrural road access

Where the evidence agrees

  • Seaborne trade volumes grew in 2024 and routes lengthened1
  • Chokepoint disruption raises freight, fuel and insurance costs23
  • A large share of road, rail and port assets is exposed to hazards1517

Where it is unsettled

  • How many people fly: airport and airline counts differ by method28297
  • How much seaborne freight moves: the UNCTAD Review and the SDG indicator differ by basis15
  • How long the 2026 Hormuz disruption lasts, and how far transits recovered244

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 21Global Infrastructure Hub (ed.), Global Infrastructure Outlook, press release of 25 July 2017 (USD 94 trillion need to 2040, USD 97 trillion with SDG access targets, USD 18 trillion unfunded). Global Infrastructure Hub, Sydney. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 16Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Systemic risks from climate-related disruptions at ports, Nature Climate Change 13, 804 to 806, 2023 (abstract and introduction opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 2UNCTAD (ed.), Strait of Hormuz Disruptions: Implications for Global Trade and Development, rapid analysis dated 10 March 2026, from Clarksons Research, EIA, LSEG, Kpler and other data. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 24European Commission (ed.), Trans-European transport network (TEN-T), policy page on Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 (core network by 2030, extended core by 2040, comprehensive by 2050). Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 25European Commission (ed.), NIS2 Directive: securing network and information systems, policy page on Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (earlier directive repealed from 18 October 2024). Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Directive (EU) 2022/2557 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the resilience of critical entities, Official Journal of the European Union, 2022; the legal text returned a challenge page and the transport scope is cited from a search summary. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 26IMO (ed.), Initial IMO GHG Strategy, hot topic page (notes that the 2023 strategy has been adopted). International Maritime Organization, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 27DNV (ed.), Decision on the IMO Net-Zero Framework delayed for one year, news item of 2025 on the second extraordinary session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee. DNV, Oslo. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: POST-CLOSE, context only: IMO (ed.), Marine Environment Protection Committee, extraordinary session of October 2025 and the session of October 2026 on the Net-Zero Framework; only the DNV summary [27] was opened. International Maritime Organization, London. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO 55000:2024, Asset management: vocabulary, overview and principles. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva; the page was blocked. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 42UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO 28000:2022, Security and resilience: security management systems for the supply chain. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva; the page was blocked. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 43UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO 22301:2019, Security and resilience: business continuity management systems. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva; the page was blocked. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 48UNVERIFIED, not opened: IMO (ed.), International Ship and Port Facility Security Code, 2004 (SOLAS chapter XI-2), cited from memory. International Maritime Organization, London. Observation year 2004. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 15Koks, E.E. et al., A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets, Nature Communications 10, 2677, 2019 (abstract via Crossref). Springer Nature. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 18Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Ports’ criticality in international trade and global supply-chains, Nature Communications 13, 2022 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 17Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E., Hall, J.W. et al., Multi-hazard risk to global port infrastructure and resulting trade and logistics losses, Communications Earth and Environment 4, 2023 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 19Thacker, S. et al., Infrastructure for sustainable development, Nature Sustainability 2, 324 to 331, 2019 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 30IPCC, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Working Group II, Chapter 6: Cities, Settlements and Key Infrastructure (chapter PDF opened). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 46UNVERIFIED, not opened: Colon, C., Hallegatte, S. and Rozenberg, J., Criticality analysis of a country’s transport network via an agent-based supply chain model, Nature Sustainability 4, 209 to 215, 2021; bibliographic record read via Crossref, abstract not read. Springer Nature. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 47UNVERIFIED, not opened: Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Port disruptions due to natural disasters: Insights into port and logistics resilience, Transportation Research Part D 85, 102393, 2020; bibliographic record read via Crossref, abstract not read. Elsevier. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025: Staying the course in turbulent waters (full report and overview). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 14Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J. and Rozenberg, J., Lifelines: The Resilient Infrastructure Opportunity. World Bank, Washington, 2019 (full report PDF). Observation year 2019 (analysis of earlier data). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 11WHO (ed.), Global status report on road safety 2023, Geneva, 13 December 2023 (publication page). World Health Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  24. 10ITU (ed.), Measuring digital development: Facts and Figures 2026 (publication page with key findings). International Telecommunication Union, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  25. 13IEA (ed.), Global Energy Review 2026 (PDF, opened from a copy of the published report hosted by a third party). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  26. 49UNVERIFIED, not opened: UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2024: Navigating maritime chokepoints; named in the SDG 9 storyline [5], not opened. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  27. 34UNVERIFIED, not opened: ITF (ed.), ITF Transport Outlook 2023. International Transport Forum at the OECD, Paris; the page returned an access error and no figure is used. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  28. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: UNDRR (ed.), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025, Resilience Pays: Financing and Investing for our Future; the page was not accessible and no figure from search summaries is used. UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  29. 5UN DESA Statistics Division (ed.), The Sustainable Development Goals Extended Report 2026, Goal 9 indicator storylines (inputs as of 30 April 2026). United Nations, New York. Observation year 2024 (indicators 9.1.2 and 9.a.1) and 2025 (indicator 9.c.1). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  30. 6DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, container port traffic (TEU), series IS.SHP.GOOD.TU, API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  31. 7DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, air transport passengers carried and freight (series IS.AIR.PSGR and IS.AIR.GOOD.MT.K1, ICAO source) and rail series (no values returned), API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  32. 8DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, individuals using the Internet (series IT.NET.USER.ZS, ITU source), API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  33. 9DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, urban population as a share of total population (series SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS, UN source), API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  34. 20ASCE (ed.), 2025 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure (summary page: overall grade C, grades from B in ports to D in stormwater and transit, USD 3.6 trillion investment gap over ten years). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  35. 28ACI World (ed.), Biannual global air travel demand update, 30 September 2025 (9.4 billion passengers in 2024; 9.8 billion projected for 2025). Airports Council International, Montreal. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  36. 29IATA (ed.), Industry outlook press release, December 2025 (5.2 billion passengers expected in 2026, up 4.4% on 2025; cargo 71.6 million tonnes). International Air Transport Association, Montreal. Observation year 2026 (expectation). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  37. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: ICAO (ed.), Air transport statistics and The World of Air Transport; the site returned an access error and no figure from it is used. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  38. 37UNVERIFIED, not opened: World Bank (ed.), Connecting to Compete 2023: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, the Logistics Performance Index; the site was not accessible and no value is used. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  39. 22NTSB (ed.), Contact of Containership Dali with Francis Scott Key Bridge and Subsequent Bridge Collapse, investigation page with probable cause and recommendations. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  40. 23ENISA (ed.), ENISA Transport Threat Landscape, March 2023 (publication page and report PDF; incidents January 2021 to October 2022). European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, Athens. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  41. 50UNVERIFIED, not opened: World Bank (ed.), Rural Access Index, SDG indicator 9.1.1; the custodian storyline in the SDG Extended Report is empty and the index was not retrieved. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  42. 3UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz shipping disruptions raise risks for energy, fertilisers and vulnerable economies, media alert UNCTAD/PRESS/MA/2026/003, Geneva, 10 March 2026. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  43. 44UNVERIFIED, not opened: UNCTAD (ed.), Strait of Hormuz tracking dashboard, launched April 2026; known only from search summaries. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

The 2027 agenda

Eight bounded questions open the 2027 infrastructure and logistics agenda. Each comes from a baseline finding, names the initiative that will carry it and the first output due in the 2027 infrastructure and logistics edition.

5 min read0 figures6 tables4 notesNR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

7.1Questions for the operational series

  1. L-01

    How would a chokepoint closure that coincides with port weather downtime and a cyber incident travel through fuel, food and health supply at once?

    INI-GS09-HRM-01 · compound chokepoint test; first output: concurrency analysis for six corridors.

  2. L-02

    What is the current condition and maintenance backlog of roads, bridges and ports outside the United States?

    INI-GS09-CND-02 · condition register; first output: asset condition table by region.

  3. L-03

    Which ports and corridors are single points of failure for island and landlocked economies?

    INI-GS09-PRT-03 · port dependence; first output: dependence map.

  4. L-04

    How reliable is access to all-season roads and rail for rural and remote communities?

    INI-GS09-ACC-04 · access and reliability; first output: rural access table.

  5. L-05

    Where do transport operations depend on a few digital suppliers and networks, and what has failed?

    INI-GS09-CYB-05 · operational technology dependence; first output: incident and dependence register.

  6. L-06

    Which shared corridors lack operational contingency arrangements for diversion?

    To be admitted in 2027; first output: arrangement overlay.

  7. L-07

    How do heat waves and storms change capacity of rail, roads, airports and ports together?

    To be admitted in 2027; first output: scoping note.

  8. L-08

    Which infrastructure capabilities have been tested in real disruptions, and which are only planned?

    Infrastructure capability register; first output: rung evidence for 15 functions.

7.2Portfolio proposed for the Q1 2027 alignment

Five initiatives and one Universe mission candidate are proposed for the 2027 infrastructure portfolio. They are programme objects: no partner, funder or member is attached to them in this edition.

Table 7.1Objects proposed for the first operational quarter
IDObjectKindQuestionState
INI-GS09-HRM-01Compound chokepoint testInitiativeL-01PROPOSED
INI-GS09-CND-02Asset condition registerInitiativeL-02PROPOSED
INI-GS09-PRT-03Port and corridor dependenceInitiativeL-03PROPOSED
INI-GS09-ACC-04Access and reliabilityInitiativeL-04PROPOSED
INI-GS09-CYB-05Operational technology dependenceInitiativeL-05PROPOSED
MSN-GS09-2027-01Compound chokepoint Universe missionMissionL-01Candidate

7.3The pathway

The infrastructure edition reads national infrastructure chapters, regional corridor and port evidence and the global edition through one governed evidence graph. At baseline the federation is designed; the Canada and global chapters are drafted. This page states what exists today and what comes next.

  1. 01

    National infrastructure chapters

    transport and logistics system of each national edition

    DRAFTED · further national baselines

  2. 02

    Corridor and port evidence

    shared sea lanes, canals, rail corridors and hubs

    PLANNED · regional Baseline Editions

  3. 03

    Infrastructure sector model

    the global infrastructure system of systems

    v0 SPECIFIED · v1 with federation evidence

  4. 04

    Global and strategic links

    GLB · SR-02 Critical Infrastructure and Lifeline Systems · SR-03 Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints

    PLANNED · strategic baselines

  5. 05

    Universe

    annual proving environment

    CANDIDATE MISSION · mandate in 2027

  6. 06

    Global Infrastructure Report

    this series

    BASELINE DRAFT · 2027 annual edition

  7. 07

    Evidence and correction

    one graph, many projections

    OPEN · first correction cycle in 2027

7.4Universe 2027: evidence pack for the infrastructure and logistics candidate mission

  1. 01

    Mandate

  2. 02

    Core Build · 1 month

  3. 03

    Action · 1 week

  4. 04

    Evidence seal

  5. 05

    Portfolio correction

  6. 06

    Next mandate

Table 7.2Universe 2027: evidence pack for the infrastructure and logistics candidate mission
ItemRecordStateTiming
F1Annual mandate recordPLANNEDafter the Q2 2027 alignment
F2Core Build recordPLANNEDone month before the exercise
F3Exercise evidencePLANNEDduring the Action week
F4Decision packetsPLANNEDexercise state only
F5Proof receiptsPLANNEDscoped to each recorded check
F6After-action reportPLANNEDwithin one quarter
F7Upgrade docketPLANNEDrouted to the Portfolio
F8Portfolio renewalPLANNED2027 global annual edition
F9Public synthesisPLANNEDpublic-safe extracts only

Mission

ID
MSN-GS09-2027-01 · Compound chokepoint Universe mission
Role spine
Leadership sponsor · Institutional anchor · Mission lead: drawn from national pathways
Receiving actors
to be identified with the mandate

7.5Handoffs and routing

Where the baseline’s findings go next. A handoff routes a finding for awareness, review or work; it transfers no authority.

Table 7.3Handoffs and routing
FindingRouted toPurposeClass
TRD-001 · trade volumespublic recordreference for the 2027 seriesPUBLIC
TRD-002 · chokepoint transitsINI-GS09-HRM-01 · key F reviewcompound chokepoint testPUBLIC
INF-005 · hazard exposureINI-GS09-CND-02asset condition registerPUBLIC
TRD-006 · ports at riskINI-GS09-PRT-03port and corridor dependencePUBLIC
HLT-008 · road deathspublic recordreference for the 2027 seriesPUBLIC
DAT-009 · connectivityINI-GS09-ACC-04access and reliabilityPUBLIC
INF-011 · structure failureINI-GS09-CYB-05operational dependence overlayPUBLIC
SYS-012 · compound pathwayMSN-GS09-2027-01Universe candidateCONSORTIUM
Table 7.4Routing rules by publication class
ClassWhere it goesWho can see it
PUBLICthe published edition and its evidence bundleanyone
CONSORTIUMgoverned rooms of the federationconsortium members under agreement
CONTROLLEDneed-to-know channelsnamed competent actors only

7.6Feeds and signal register

Table 7.5Feeds watched from 2027
FeedProducerLatencyFeeds into
Review of Maritime Transport and the shipping trackingUNCTADannual and ad hocTRD-001
Chokepoint transit seriesIMF PortWatch and UNCTADdailyTRD-002
World Development IndicatorsWorld BankannualTRD-006
Road safety status reportsWHOperiodicHLT-008
Facts and FiguresITUannualDAT-009
SDG 9 indicatorsUN DESA and custodian agenciesannualFIN-007
Transport Threat LandscapeENISAperiodicINF-011

Escalation routes

  • none · keep monitoring
  • research question
  • project
  • risk object
  • annual publication
  • signal report
Table 7.6Signals at baseline
IDSignalCorroborationSystemsRoute
SIG-GS09-001Hormuz transits fell by 97% in early March 20262CORROBORATEDTRD · ENE · FOOresearch question L-01
SIG-GS09-002Suez tonnage stayed 70% below the 2023 average1CORROBORATEDTRD · FINinitiative L-03
SIG-GS09-003Port downtime from climate hazards1617PARTIALINF · TRDresearch question L-03

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 2UNCTAD (ed.), Strait of Hormuz Disruptions: Implications for Global Trade and Development, rapid analysis dated 10 March 2026, from Clarksons Research, EIA, LSEG, Kpler and other data. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025: Staying the course in turbulent waters (full report and overview). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 16Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Systemic risks from climate-related disruptions at ports, Nature Climate Change 13, 804 to 806, 2023 (abstract and introduction opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 17Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E., Hall, J.W. et al., Multi-hazard risk to global port infrastructure and resulting trade and logistics losses, Communications Earth and Environment 4, 2023 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Systems in depth

One section per system: its state at evidence close, its exposures and what the operational series will watch.

8 min read0 figures5 tables20 notesNR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

8.1Infrastructure and water

Water levels and floods shape routes. Flooding causes about 73% of expected direct damage to road and rail, and canals and rivers carry freight only while levels allow.

73%

of expected road and rail damage from flooding15

13,404transits

Panama Canal, 202532

7.5%

of road and rail assets exposed to a 1-in-100-year flood15

Table 8.1State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Roads and railflooding is the largest source of expected direct damage; protection could return a positive benefit on about 60% of exposed roads15Reported
Canalscanal transits are reported by the operator; UNCTAD notes congestion and transit restrictions at the Panama Canal in 2024, not quantified here321Reported
Ports and coaststropical cyclones cause 32% of port-specific risk; sea level rise is not quantified here17Reported
Water use of transportnot consolidated here30Expert input

Couplings

  • WAT → INF flood and low-flow disruption
  • INF → WAT dredging and canal works
  • CLI → WAT → INF storm surge and sea level

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • canal capacity in low-flow years
  • water use of ports and rail

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • GS-03 Food and Agrifood Systems
  • GS-04 Health and One Health
  • GS-10 Cities and Urban Systems
  • SR-03 Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints

8.2Infrastructure and food

Food moves on ports, roads and cold chains. The 2026 Hormuz disruption showed that the link runs through fertiliser freight as well as fuel.

1/3share

of seaborne fertiliser trade passes through Hormuz2

16million tonnes

of fertiliser shipped from the Gulf in 20242

2%

of dry bulk trade passes through Hormuz, including grain2

Table 8.2State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Fertiliser freightabout 16 million tonnes a year pass through the strait; urea is 67% of it23Reported
Freight costfreight, bunker and insurance costs rose in March 2026 and may raise food costs2Reported
Port reliancelow-income countries and small islands rely 1.5 and 2.0 times more on ports than the global average18Reported
Cold chainsdepend on reliable roads and power; no consolidated series here1Expert input

Couplings

  • INF → FOO freight and ports
  • TRD → INF → FOO fertiliser price transmission
  • ENE → INF → FOO haulage fuel

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • food price pass-through by region
  • cold-chain reliability

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • GS-03 Food and Agrifood Systems
  • GS-04 Health and One Health
  • GS-10 Cities and Urban Systems
  • SR-03 Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints

8.3Infrastructure and health

Infrastructure shapes health through safe roads, access to care and connected services. Road crashes remain the clearest measured harm.

1.19million

road traffic deaths, 202111

92%

of road deaths in low- and middle-income countries12

2billion

people offline in 202610

Table 8.3State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Road safety1.19 million deaths in 2021; leading cause of death for people aged 5 to 29; a fact sheet gives 1.16 million1112Reported
Cost of crashesmost countries bear a cost of about 3% of GDP12Reported
Connectivity3G or better covers 96% of people; 4% (312 million) have no mobile broadband5Reported
Access to carenot consolidated here14Expert input

Couplings

  • INF → HLT crashes and access
  • DAT → INF → HLT telehealth and logistics
  • ENE → INF → HLT fuel and power for care

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • travel time to care by region
  • reliability of connectivity

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • GS-03 Food and Agrifood Systems
  • GS-04 Health and One Health
  • GS-10 Cities and Urban Systems
  • SR-03 Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints

8.4Infrastructure and nature

Infrastructure influences almost every goal for people and the planet. Shipping and corridors also press on climate and habitats, and the nature side of the ledger is thin in this edition.

72%

of SDG targets influenced by infrastructure19

2.5billion

more urban people by 205030

1.43°C

above pre-industrial, 202531

Table 8.4State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Sustainable developmentinfrastructure directly or indirectly influences all of the SDGs, including 72% of targets19Reported
Shipping emissionsthe IMO adopted a strategy in 2023 and deferred the Net-Zero Framework in 20252627Reported
Fleet transition8% of the active fleet by gross tonnage is designed for alternative fuels; over 90% runs on conventional fuels1Reported
Habitat effectsdredging, corridors and port expansion; not consolidated here30Expert input

Couplings

  • INF → BIO corridors and dredging
  • INF → CLI emissions
  • BIO → INF pests and invasive species carried by trade

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • habitat effects of corridors and dredging
  • transport emissions on one basis

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • GS-03 Food and Agrifood Systems
  • GS-04 Health and One Health
  • GS-10 Cities and Urban Systems
  • SR-03 Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints

8.5Infrastructure, energy and extremes

Transport now draws on power as well as fuel, and sudden failures come from chokepoints, storms, structures and software. These are the channels the 2024 to 2026 evidence shows.

21million

electric cars sold in 202513

3.6%

rise in oil use for aviation in 202513

98incidents

reported cyber incidents on transport, 2021 to 202223

Table 8.5State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Fuel and powerelectric cars one in four sales; transport over 10% of electricity demand growth in 202513Reported
ChokepointsHormuz transits fell 97%; Suez tonnage 70% below the 2023 average21Reported
Structuresa loose wire caused a blackout on a vessel that struck a bridge; six workers died22Reported
Cyber incidentsransomware was 38% of incidents in 2021 to 2022; cybercriminals 54% of attackers23Reported

Couplings

  • TRD → INF chokepoints
  • DAT → INF cyber disruption
  • ENE → INF fuel and power

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • chokepoint position after March 2026
  • cyber incidents since 2022

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • GS-03 Food and Agrifood Systems
  • GS-04 Health and One Health
  • GS-10 Cities and Urban Systems
  • SR-03 Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 15Koks, E.E. et al., A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets, Nature Communications 10, 2677, 2019 (abstract via Crossref). Springer Nature. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 32Autoridad del Canal de Panama (ed.), Panama Canal Authority, home page statistics (13,404 transits in 2025). Panama Canal Authority, Balboa. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025: Staying the course in turbulent waters (full report and overview). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 17Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E., Hall, J.W. et al., Multi-hazard risk to global port infrastructure and resulting trade and logistics losses, Communications Earth and Environment 4, 2023 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 30IPCC, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Working Group II, Chapter 6: Cities, Settlements and Key Infrastructure (chapter PDF opened). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 2UNCTAD (ed.), Strait of Hormuz Disruptions: Implications for Global Trade and Development, rapid analysis dated 10 March 2026, from Clarksons Research, EIA, LSEG, Kpler and other data. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 3UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz shipping disruptions raise risks for energy, fertilisers and vulnerable economies, media alert UNCTAD/PRESS/MA/2026/003, Geneva, 10 March 2026. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 18Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Ports’ criticality in international trade and global supply-chains, Nature Communications 13, 2022 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 11WHO (ed.), Global status report on road safety 2023, Geneva, 13 December 2023 (publication page). World Health Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 12WHO (ed.), Road traffic injuries, fact sheet updated 20 July 2026 (about 1.16 million deaths a year; 92% in low- and middle-income countries; reference year not stated). World Health Organization, Geneva. Observation year not stated on the page. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 10ITU (ed.), Measuring digital development: Facts and Figures 2026 (publication page with key findings). International Telecommunication Union, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 5UN DESA Statistics Division (ed.), The Sustainable Development Goals Extended Report 2026, Goal 9 indicator storylines (inputs as of 30 April 2026). United Nations, New York. Observation year 2024 (indicators 9.1.2 and 9.a.1) and 2025 (indicator 9.c.1). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 14Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J. and Rozenberg, J., Lifelines: The Resilient Infrastructure Opportunity. World Bank, Washington, 2019 (full report PDF). Observation year 2019 (analysis of earlier data). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 19Thacker, S. et al., Infrastructure for sustainable development, Nature Sustainability 2, 324 to 331, 2019 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 31WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, press release of 23 March 2026 (2025 about 1.43 °C above the 1850 to 1900 average). World Meteorological Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 26IMO (ed.), Initial IMO GHG Strategy, hot topic page (notes that the 2023 strategy has been adopted). International Maritime Organization, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 27DNV (ed.), Decision on the IMO Net-Zero Framework delayed for one year, news item of 2025 on the second extraordinary session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee. DNV, Oslo. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 13IEA (ed.), Global Energy Review 2026 (PDF, opened from a copy of the published report hosted by a third party). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 23ENISA (ed.), ENISA Transport Threat Landscape, March 2023 (publication page and report PDF; incidents January 2021 to October 2022). European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, Athens. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 22NTSB (ed.), Contact of Containership Dali with Francis Scott Key Bridge and Subsequent Bridge Collapse, investigation page with probable cause and recommendations. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Methodology

How the edition was made: methods, the model card, the evidence cut and its age, the acceptance record and the glossary.

14 min read0 figures13 tables19 notesNR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

A.1Methods

The global baseline uses published values and four simple derivations. Each is shown in full so that any reader can reproduce it.

Table A.1Methods
No.DerivationCalculationResult
(1)Growth of the average voyage haul, 2018 to 20245,245 ÷ 4,831about 1.09 times
(2)Daily Hormuz transits after a 97% fall129 × (1 − 0.97)about 4 a day
(3)Unfunded share of the 2040 need, 2017 outlook18 ÷ 97about 18.6%
(4)Transport share of official infrastructure flows, 202426.7 ÷ 78.7about 33.9%
Table A.2Coupling strength scale (matrix and model card)
StrengthDefinition
STRONGa disruption in the source system has historically changed the target system’s service or output within one season, in more than one region
MODERATEan effect is documented but buffered or slower
WEAKan effect is plausible but not documented at global scale
Table A.3Status grammar
LabelRule
Reportedvalue as issued by its source, with year
Inferredreasoned from cited evidence; never a measurement
EstimatedNexus analytical value with stated method
Scenarioconditional on stated assumptions
Expert inputstructured editorial judgement awaiting evidence

A.2Model card, Infrastructure and Logistics Sector Model v0

Model ID
MDL-GS09-INFRASTRUCTURE · v0.1
Purpose
represent the global infrastructure, transport and logistics system and its couplings to water, energy, food, health and biodiversity
Family
graph-based system of systems
Inputs
the cited sources of this edition; no proprietary data
Method
expert-specified coupling strengths (STRONG · MODERATE · WEAK) from assessments and analogue events
Validation
none yet, first validation against federation evidence in 2027
Uncertainty
qualitative; strengths are hypotheses, not measurements
Domain of validity
global scale; not for asset-, site- or country-level use
Reproducibility
strength table and sources published in this edition
20couplings

typed in v0

3strong

documented within one season

6moderate

documented, buffered

11weak

plausible, undocumented

A.3The baseline evidence cut

Every Nexus edition is published from a frozen evidence cut. The global baseline cut is documentary: it pins the exact edition of every source cited. Federation cuts begin with the first national Foundry cuts in 2027.

Cut ID
DC-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Type
baseline documentary cut
Resolution policy
pinned · as of 30 September 2026
Sources pinned
50 cited sources, each at the edition and access date in the references
Model runs
none at baseline, analytical values are stated with their method
Digest
computed at freeze and recorded in the publication record
Supersedes
nothing, first cut of the series
Superseded by
the 2027 infrastructure and logistics annual cut

Lineage

  1. 01

    source edition

  2. 02

    pinned citation

  3. 03

    finding

  4. 04

    page

  5. 05

    publication record

Table A.4From the baseline cut to the federation cut
ElementBaseline 20262027 global annual
Sourcescited global publications, pinned by editionnational, regional and sector cuts through one graph
Analysisstated methods and editorial estimatestyped analysis specifications
ModelsInfrastructure and Logistics Sector Model v0 specificationmodel runs with receipts
Findingstwelve baseline findingsfindings re-bound to federation evidence
Reviewfive passes scheduledfive passes on the exact digest

A.4Evidence age and coverage

A 2026 global edition rests on evidence observed in many different years. This page shows each time base, so that no single year label hides older evidence.

Table A.5Evidence age and coverage
IndicatorObservedReleasedCadenceNext release
Seaborne trade volume and ton-miles2024Review of 2025annualReview of Maritime Transport 2026
Hormuz transits2026March 2026ad hocUNCTAD tracking
Container port traffic2024WDI update of 8 October 2026annualnext WDI update
Air passengers on the World Bank series2023WDI update of 8 October 2026annualnext WDI update
Road traffic deaths2021Dec 2023; fact sheet Jul 2026periodicnext WHO report
Internet use2026Facts and Figures 2026annualFacts and Figures 2027
Official flows for infrastructure2024Apr 2026 inputsannualnext SDG report
Disruption cost to households and firms20192019one-offno update found
Global investment need20172017one-offno update found
Transport cyber incidents2021 to 2022Mar 2023periodicENISA Threat Landscape 2026
Table A.6Coverage by system at baseline
SystemCoverageThinnest dimension
Trade and portsGOODport waiting times and recovery
ChokepointsPARTIALposition after March 2026
Hazard exposureGOODasset condition and maintenance
Road safetyGOODreference year of the latest estimate
ConnectivityGOODservice quality and affordability
InvestmentPARTIALa current global need estimate
Rail and rural accessTHINglobal volume and access series
ResiliencePARTIALtested capabilities beyond rerouting
Table A.7Designed empty states: what is not bound, what would fill it and why
FieldSource that would fill itBlocker
Chokepoint transits at Hormuz, Suez, Bab el-Mandeb and Panama after March 2026, on a daily seriesIMF PortWatch daily series33; UNCTAD tracking44the PortWatch daily service returned an access error and the UNCTAD tracking was not opened
Position of the Strait of Hormuz and shipping at the evidence closeUNCTAD tracking44; monthly shipping reportsreleases after March 2026 were not retrieved; only search summaries were read
Review of Maritime Transport 2026UNCTADthe publication page returned not found on 2026-11-03; not yet issued or moved
Share of the rural population within 2 km of an all-season road (SDG 9.1.1)World Bank Rural Access Index50the custodian storyline in the SDG Extended Report is empty; not retrieved
Global rail passenger and freight volumesWorld Bank WDI rail series7; ITF34the World Bank rail series returned no values for 2018 to 2023 and the ITF page was not accessible
Air passengers for 2024 and 2025 on the airline basisICAO air transport statistics35the ICAO site was not accessible and the World Bank series ends in 2023
Reference year of the WHO estimate of 1.16 million road deathsWHO fact sheet12; next WHO status reportthe fact sheet states no reference year; the 1.19 million figure for 2021 is used
Condition and maintenance backlog of roads, bridges and ports outside the United Statesnational transport ministries; OECD and ITF34no consolidated global series found; the ASCE grade covers the United States only20
Current global infrastructure investment need and gapGlobal Infrastructure Hub; World Bankthe 2017 outlook is the latest estimate found21; later updates were not retrieved
Logistics performance values by economyWorld Bank Logistics Performance Index37the site was not accessible; no value is used and no economy is placed in an order
Cyber incidents on transport operations since 2022ENISA Threat Landscape 202645only the publication listing was read; the 2021 to 2022 report is used
Heat, flood and storm disruption of transport networks in 2026operator reports; weather services31not retrieved
Disaster losses to infrastructure on one basisUNDRR Global Assessment Report 202536the report page was not accessible; figures in search summaries are not used
Net-Zero Framework outcome after the October 2026 IMO sessionIMO press releases40the session took place after the retrieved material; not retrieved
Transport entities designated as critical in the EUnational authorities; Directive (EU) 2022/255739the legal text was not accessible and no designation list was found
Transport greenhouse gas emissions on one basisITF34; IEA38not retrieved; no figure is used
Seafarer, driver and port workforce supplyILO; IMO; national statisticsnot reviewed
Capability rungs beyond rerouting and advisoriesoperators, regulators, ministriesnot reviewed

A.5Evidence cards, two anchor sources

Issued by UN Trade and Development from shipping market data and port reports. Annual. Role: binds TRD-001 and TRD-003. UNCTAD also issued a separate rapid analysis for 2026 [2].

EVD-GS09-001

UNCTAD Review of Maritime Transport 20251

Issued by UN Trade and Development on 10 March 2026 from commercial shipping, energy and fertiliser data. One-off. Role: binds TRD-002. A later UNCTAD note gives about 95% for the fall in transits [4].

EVD-GS09-002

UNCTAD Strait of Hormuz Disruptions2

Table A.8Quality dimensions at baseline
DimensionEVD-GS09-001EVD-GS09-002
Completenessglobal fleet, trade and ports; modelled where data are missinga single strait for a few weeks
Timelinessabout 5 months after the yearissued within weeks of the event
Revisionannual editionlater notes give about 95%
Method transparencydata sources nameddata sources named on each chart
External validationcompared with commercial seriesbased on a commercial intelligence provider

Evidence cards to follow in 2027

  • UNCTAD1: port waiting times and call data
  • UNCTAD44: tracking series for 2026
  • World Bank7: air and rail series after 2023
  • ENISA45: transport incidents since 2022

A.6Publication acceptance record

Editorial self-check at evidence close. Every applicable item carries a disposition; the remaining items are review, approval and deposit.

Table A.9Publication acceptance record
GroupAreaItemsPassN/APending
D1Identity and scope8800
D2Source and data12912
D3Analysis and models12381
D4Findings and claims9801
D5Figures, tables, maps10622
D6Editorial and citations10802
D7Review and approval130013
D8Artefact and design12705
D9Registry and release9009

Publication gate

Conditions met
14 of 23 at evidence close
Blocking problems
none recorded
Open conditions
reviews, approval of the exact digest, deposit, registry pointer

Not applicable at baseline

Model runs
first runs in Q1 2027
Maps
plates in Q2 2027
Waivers
none

A.7Status words

Table A.10The status every value carries
StatusWhat it means
ObservedMeasured directly and published by the source.
ReportedPublished statistics of an official or institutional source.
DeclaredStated by the body concerned; not independently measured.
EstimatedA Nexus estimate from cited evidence, with its method in Annex A.
ModelledProduced by a stated model from cited inputs.
InferredReasoned from cited evidence; not measured.
ForecastA projection by the cited source.
SimulatedA simulation result under stated assumptions.
ScenarioA conditional statement under stated assumptions; never a prediction.
Expert inputExpert judgement, recorded with its basis.
CandidateProposed for a later edition; not yet evidence.
Evidence-quality levels (EQL 1 to 5) grade the source behind a value; they are not a score of the subject.

A.8How the edition is made, released and corrected

Every edition is built from a sealed evidence cut, reviewed under three keys, signed and deposited before any site shows it as published; corrections go to Nexus Standards as change proposals and feed the next cut.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Evidence arrives from the pillarsFoundry seals observations and indicator series, Universe hands over after-action and scenario findings, and contributions are screened at every gateway, including this site’s.
02 The cut is sealedOn the cut date the evidence is pinned under one identifier, so anyone can rebuild the edition from exactly what it was built on.
03 The edition is assembledThe edition is drafted from its template and content pack. Agents may draft; they never publish and never decide.
04 The keys turnAt the publisher of record the truth key comes first: every value is checked against its source or stated method before the meaning and capital keys turn. No edition moves on until every key has been turned by a named steward.
05 The gate opensA named approver releases one exact digest of the edition; any change after this point is a new version, never a silent edit.
06 Signed and depositedThe PDF, the web edition and the data bundle are signed together with a manifest and an RO-Crate description, and deposited on Zenodo with a concept and a version DOI.
07 Published on its desk’s siteOnly then does the edition show as published on its desk’s Reports site, and the Collection lists it as a part.
08 Corrections go to StandardsMethod and correction findings go to Nexus Standards as change proposals; citations, corrections and new contributions feed the next evidence cut.

A teaching model of the process, not a forecast and not a record of any run; dates and counts on this page come from the programme record. Sources: Reports governance at GCRI Canada (2026); Zenodo, repository of record for Reports deposits (2026).

Lifecycle, one state at a time: Draft, Computed, Evidence bound, Reviewed, Approved for release, Published, Corrected, Superseded. This edition is a draft.

A.9Glossary and abbreviations

Table A.11Series terms
TermMeaning
Baseline Editionthe inaugural annual edition that fixes the reference state for the series
WEFH+Binfrastructure and logistics, energy, food, health and biodiversity, the national nexus core
Couplinga typed dependency through which one system transmits to another
Protection gapthe share of losses not covered by insurance
Capability ladderLISTED → EXISTS → ADEQUATE → TESTED → DEMONSTRATED
EQLevidence-quality level, 1–5
Evidence cuta frozen resolution of exact sources and versions
NNC · NLC · NWGNational Nexus Consortium · National Leadership Council · National Working Groups
Table A.12Abbreviations used in this edition
AbbreviationExpansion
ACIAirports Council International
ASCEAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
ENISAEuropean Union Agency for Cybersecurity
IATAInternational Air Transport Association
ICAOInternational Civil Aviation Organization
IMOInternational Maritime Organization
ITFInternational Transport Forum
ITUInternational Telecommunication Union
NTSBNational Transportation Safety Board
SCFIShanghai Containerized Freight Index
TEN-Ttrans-European transport network
TEUtwenty-foot equivalent unit

A.10Technical annex

Table A.13Technical annex
ItemAnnexContentsStatus
A.1Indicator definitionsthe global indicator set, with units and sourcesIN THIS EDITION
A.2Coupling strengthsthe twenty-cell matrix and its rationaleIN THIS EDITION
A.3Scenario specificationSCN-GS09-HRM-01 assumptions and signpostsIN THIS EDITION
A.4Capability placementsrung evidence for fifteen functionsIN THIS EDITION
A.5Model diagnosticsfirst runs and validation2027
A.6Sensitivity analysesinfluence of coupling strengths2027
A.7Corridor and port notescards for the major shared chokepoints and corridorsWITH REGIONAL EDITIONS
A.8Review statementspass-by-pass review recordAT RELEASE

A.1 · indicator definition: daily ship transits through a chokepoint

Construct
number of ship transits counted in a day through a strait or canal
Unit
ships a day
Method
vessel position data from a commercial shipping intelligence provider, compiled by UNCTAD
Source
UNCTAD, Strait of Hormuz Disruptions, March 20262
Uncertainty
vessel classes and thresholds as defined by the provider; a later UNCTAD note gives a fall of about 95%4
Known limits
counts ships, not tonnage or cargo value; the 2026 series after March is not bound here

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: IMF (ed.), PortWatch daily chokepoint transit series; the daily service returned an access error and only a static chokepoint list was read, from which no figure is used. International Monetary Fund, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 44UNVERIFIED, not opened: UNCTAD (ed.), Strait of Hormuz tracking dashboard, launched April 2026; known only from search summaries. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 50UNVERIFIED, not opened: World Bank (ed.), Rural Access Index, SDG indicator 9.1.1; the custodian storyline in the SDG Extended Report is empty and the index was not retrieved. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 7DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, air transport passengers carried and freight (series IS.AIR.PSGR and IS.AIR.GOOD.MT.K1, ICAO source) and rail series (no values returned), API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 34UNVERIFIED, not opened: ITF (ed.), ITF Transport Outlook 2023. International Transport Forum at the OECD, Paris; the page returned an access error and no figure is used. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: ICAO (ed.), Air transport statistics and The World of Air Transport; the site returned an access error and no figure from it is used. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 12WHO (ed.), Road traffic injuries, fact sheet updated 20 July 2026 (about 1.16 million deaths a year; 92% in low- and middle-income countries; reference year not stated). World Health Organization, Geneva. Observation year not stated on the page. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 20ASCE (ed.), 2025 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure (summary page: overall grade C, grades from B in ports to D in stormwater and transit, USD 3.6 trillion investment gap over ten years). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 21Global Infrastructure Hub (ed.), Global Infrastructure Outlook, press release of 25 July 2017 (USD 94 trillion need to 2040, USD 97 trillion with SDG access targets, USD 18 trillion unfunded). Global Infrastructure Hub, Sydney. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 37UNVERIFIED, not opened: World Bank (ed.), Connecting to Compete 2023: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, the Logistics Performance Index; the site was not accessible and no value is used. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 45UNVERIFIED, not opened: ENISA (ed.), ENISA Threat Landscape 2026, published 22 September 2026; only the listing entry was read. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, Athens. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 31WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, press release of 23 March 2026 (2025 about 1.43 °C above the 1850 to 1900 average). World Meteorological Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: UNDRR (ed.), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025, Resilience Pays: Financing and Investing for our Future; the page was not accessible and no figure from search summaries is used. UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: POST-CLOSE, context only: IMO (ed.), Marine Environment Protection Committee, extraordinary session of October 2025 and the session of October 2026 on the Net-Zero Framework; only the DNV summary [27] was opened. International Maritime Organization, London. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Directive (EU) 2022/2557 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the resilience of critical entities, Official Journal of the European Union, 2022; the legal text returned a challenge page and the transport scope is cited from a search summary. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: IEA (ed.), Global EV Outlook 2026; the page was not accessible and figures from news summaries are not used. International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025: Staying the course in turbulent waters (full report and overview). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 2UNCTAD (ed.), Strait of Hormuz Disruptions: Implications for Global Trade and Development, rapid analysis dated 10 March 2026, from Clarksons Research, EIA, LSEG, Kpler and other data. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 4UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption shows why early-warning data matters, news item (about 95% fall in ship transits; tracking tool described). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Data appendix

The indicator set with its sources, the source registers, the licences of every kind of material and the formats of the edition.

11 min read0 figures8 tables26 notesNR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

B.1The indicator set

Table B.1Global baseline indicator set
IndicatorValueUnitYearStateSource
Seaborne trade volume12,720million tons2024Reported1
Seaborne trade, SDG indicator basis24.1billion metric tons2024Reported5
Growth in seaborne trade ton-miles5.9%2024Reported1
Average voyage haul5,245miles2024Reported1
Container port traffic913million TEU2024Reported6
Container port traffic854million TEU2023Reported6
Daily Hormuz transits, February average129ships a day2026Reported2
Fall in daily Hormuz transits, early March97%2026Reported2
Panama Canal transits13,404transits2025Reported32
Air passengers carried, airline basis4.27billion2023Reported7
Airport passengers, ACI World9.4billion2024Reported28
Airline passengers expected, IATA5.2billion2026Scenario29
Disruption cost in low- and middle-income countries391 to 647USD billion a year2019Reported14
Road and rail assets exposed to a hazard27%2019Reported15
Ports exposed to more than three hazards86%2023Reported17
Road traffic deaths, WHO 2023 report1.19million2021Reported11
Road traffic deaths, WHO fact sheet1.16millionnot statedReported12
People using the Internet, ITU76%2026Reported10
People using the Internet, World Bank series73.6%2025Reported8
Official flows for infrastructure, developing countries78.7USD billion2024Reported5
Infrastructure need to 2040, 2017 outlook94USD trillion2017Reported21
Electric car sales21million2025Reported13
Urban population share57.8%2025Reported9

B.2Global source register

The governed source set behind this edition. Each source keeps its authority, coverage, cadence and role; categories describe origin, not truth.

Domains bound by the register

  • TRD
  • INF
  • FIN
  • HLT
  • DAT
  • CLI
  • ENE
  • FOO
  • WAT
  • BIO
Table B.3Global source register
SourceCategoryCoveragePeriodCadenceRole
UNCTAD Review of Maritime Transport 20251intergovernmental agencyglobal2024annualtrade, fleet
UNCTAD Hormuz analysis2intergovernmental agencyStrait of Hormuz2026one-offchokepoint
SDG 9 Extended Report5UN agenciesglobal2024annualfreight, finance, coverage
World Bank WDI series67multilateral development bankglobal2024annualports, air
ITU Facts and Figures10UN specialised agencyglobal2026annualconnectivity
WHO road safety report11UN specialised agencyglobal2021periodicroad deaths
World Bank Lifelines14multilateral development banklow- and middle-income countries2019one-offdisruption cost
Koks et al.15peer-reviewed literatureglobal2019one-offroad and rail risk
NTSB Key Bridge investigation22national investigation boardUnited States2024one-offstructure failure
ENISA Transport Threat Landscape23EU agencyEuropean Union2022periodiccyber incidents

B.3Regional reading: infrastructure and logistics across ten clusters

Map plates follow with the regional Baseline Editions, when boundary sources and public-safe resolutions are bound. This page gives the regional reading in table form and ranks no region.

Table B.4Regional reading: infrastructure and logistics across ten clusters
RegionPrincipal hazardsSystems most exposedBaseline evidence
North Americaageing structures; vessel strikes on bridges; winter weatherroads, ports, railKey Bridge report22; ASCE grade C20
South Americacanal and port dependence for grain and mineralsports, riversregional statistics (not bound)
Europenetwork completion and cyber dutiesrail, roads, portsnetwork and NIS2 rules2425; transport incidents23
Eurasiarail and sea corridors; sanctions-driven reroutingrail, portsregional statistics (not bound)
Middle East and North AfricaHormuz and Suez exposureoil, gas, fertiliser, containersUNCTAD21
Africarural access and mobile coverage gapsroads, networksSDG 9 coverage figures5
South Asiaport growth and flood exposureports, roadsregional statistics (not bound)
East Asialarge ports exposed to extreme wind; container hubsports, container tradeport downtime study16; container traffic6
ASEANstraits and archipelagic routesports, sea lanesregional statistics (not bound)
Oceania-Pacificsmall island economies reliant on single portsports, air linksport criticality study18; trade risk at island ports17

B.4Corridor card: Strait of Hormuz

  • chokepoint
  • strait
  • oil and fertiliser
  • seaborne
Systems in view
fuel, fertiliser, shipping, insurance
Defining events
disruption to shipping from late February 20262
Couplings
TRD → ENE fuel supply; TRD → FOO fertiliser; TRD → FIN freight and insurance cost
Capability evidence
rapid analysis and tracking published by UNCTAD24
Gaps
transits after March 2026; bypass capacity
Agenda items
L-01 · L-03

About 20 million barrels of oil a day and about one third of seaborne fertiliser trade passed through the strait in 2024 [2].

CHOKEPOINT

Single passage

Bunker fuel prices rose about 100% between 27 February and 9 March 2026 and war-risk premiums were repriced [2].

COST

Freight and insurance

UNCTAD built a tracking tool for shipping, food, energy and finance indicators; the tool itself was not opened here [4] [44].

LEARNING

Early-warning data

B.5How countries appear in the infrastructure and logistics edition

Countries enter the infrastructure edition through the infrastructure and logistics chapters of their own national editions, on one card grammar. They are read against peer distributions and thresholds, never ranked.

Table B.5How countries appear in the infrastructure and logistics edition
Card fieldWhat it showsSource
WEFH+B stateeach core system against peer distribution bandsnational edition
Couplingsthe national dependency matrixnational edition
Risk objectsthe national risk portfolionational edition
Capability rungsthe national capability laddernational edition
Evidence ageoldest and newest source datesnational source register

Editions in the 2026 Baseline programme

26national

countries and unions

10regional

clusters

16global

flagship and sector

14strategic

systems reports

20frontier

technology reports

How to read a country card

  • Each system is shown against the distribution of its peers, with thresholds where they exist
  • Couplings and risk objects come from the country’s own national edition
  • Capability rungs record evidence, not a judgement of institutions
  • Evidence age is printed, so older national data are visible as such
Table B.6National Baseline Editions in the 2026 programme
WaveCountries and unionsState
W0CanadaISSUED
W1United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, European Union, SwitzerlandPLANNED
W2Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Türkiye, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, Senegal, Kenya, African Union, India, China, Republic of Korea, Indonesia, Singapore, AustraliaPLANNED

B.6Licences

Table B.7Licences of each kind of material
MaterialLicence
TextCC BY 4.0
Dataon the licence of each source; Nexus tables CC BY 4.0
FiguresNexus figures CC BY 4.0; third-party as credited
Mapsboundary source and licence printed on each plate
MetadataCC0 1.0, as Zenodo publishes it
Third-party data, figures and textThe source’s own licence, credited where it is used; never relicensed
Nexus-authored text, tables and figures: CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0). Map plates print their boundary source and licence.

B.7Formats and provenance

Table B.8This edition in every format
FormatKindStateWhat it isIdentifier
Web editionHTMLOn this siteDraft in stewardship review; every value resolves to its source.NR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Print editionPDFAt releaseA4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF, signed with the web edition at release.NR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Indicator dataCSV · JSONOn this site23 indicators with unit, year, status and source; the machine-readable copy ships with the evidence bundle at release.NR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE data release v1
FiguresSVG · PNGOn this site4 on the web edition: headline figure, figure 1.3, coupling instrument, capability ladder.FIG-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-*
SlidesPDFNot recordedNo slide deck is recorded for this edition.
Evidence briefHTML · PDFNot recordedNo evidence brief is recorded for this edition.
Dataset with DOIDataCiteAt releaseConcept and version DOI are minted at deposit; none is recorded yet.

Provenance

Edition pack
The edition’s content pack (JSON), from which the print and web editions are built
Evidence cut
DC-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-B0, closed 30 September 2026
Reproducibility
sourced values cited; analytical values reproducible from stated parameters
Self-check
14 of 23 at evidence close; a fail on any item blocks release
Review
five passes scheduled before release (in Annex C)
Publisher of record
GCRI for the Nexus Consortium
Corrections
Registry correction pathway; upheld corrections are published as notices with a new version

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025: Staying the course in turbulent waters (full report and overview). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 5UN DESA Statistics Division (ed.), The Sustainable Development Goals Extended Report 2026, Goal 9 indicator storylines (inputs as of 30 April 2026). United Nations, New York. Observation year 2024 (indicators 9.1.2 and 9.a.1) and 2025 (indicator 9.c.1). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 6DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, container port traffic (TEU), series IS.SHP.GOOD.TU, API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 2UNCTAD (ed.), Strait of Hormuz Disruptions: Implications for Global Trade and Development, rapid analysis dated 10 March 2026, from Clarksons Research, EIA, LSEG, Kpler and other data. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 32Autoridad del Canal de Panama (ed.), Panama Canal Authority, home page statistics (13,404 transits in 2025). Panama Canal Authority, Balboa. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 7DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, air transport passengers carried and freight (series IS.AIR.PSGR and IS.AIR.GOOD.MT.K1, ICAO source) and rail series (no values returned), API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 28ACI World (ed.), Biannual global air travel demand update, 30 September 2025 (9.4 billion passengers in 2024; 9.8 billion projected for 2025). Airports Council International, Montreal. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 29IATA (ed.), Industry outlook press release, December 2025 (5.2 billion passengers expected in 2026, up 4.4% on 2025; cargo 71.6 million tonnes). International Air Transport Association, Montreal. Observation year 2026 (expectation). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 14Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J. and Rozenberg, J., Lifelines: The Resilient Infrastructure Opportunity. World Bank, Washington, 2019 (full report PDF). Observation year 2019 (analysis of earlier data). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 15Koks, E.E. et al., A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets, Nature Communications 10, 2677, 2019 (abstract via Crossref). Springer Nature. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 17Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E., Hall, J.W. et al., Multi-hazard risk to global port infrastructure and resulting trade and logistics losses, Communications Earth and Environment 4, 2023 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 11WHO (ed.), Global status report on road safety 2023, Geneva, 13 December 2023 (publication page). World Health Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 12WHO (ed.), Road traffic injuries, fact sheet updated 20 July 2026 (about 1.16 million deaths a year; 92% in low- and middle-income countries; reference year not stated). World Health Organization, Geneva. Observation year not stated on the page. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 10ITU (ed.), Measuring digital development: Facts and Figures 2026 (publication page with key findings). International Telecommunication Union, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 8DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, individuals using the Internet (series IT.NET.USER.ZS, ITU source), API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 21Global Infrastructure Hub (ed.), Global Infrastructure Outlook, press release of 25 July 2017 (USD 94 trillion need to 2040, USD 97 trillion with SDG access targets, USD 18 trillion unfunded). Global Infrastructure Hub, Sydney. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 13IEA (ed.), Global Energy Review 2026 (PDF, opened from a copy of the published report hosted by a third party). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 9DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, urban population as a share of total population (series SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS, UN source), API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 22NTSB (ed.), Contact of Containership Dali with Francis Scott Key Bridge and Subsequent Bridge Collapse, investigation page with probable cause and recommendations. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 23ENISA (ed.), ENISA Transport Threat Landscape, March 2023 (publication page and report PDF; incidents January 2021 to October 2022). European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, Athens. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 20ASCE (ed.), 2025 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure (summary page: overall grade C, grades from B in ports to D in stormwater and transit, USD 3.6 trillion investment gap over ten years). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 24European Commission (ed.), Trans-European transport network (TEN-T), policy page on Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 (core network by 2030, extended core by 2040, comprehensive by 2050). Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 25European Commission (ed.), NIS2 Directive: securing network and information systems, policy page on Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (earlier directive repealed from 18 October 2024). Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  24. 16Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Systemic risks from climate-related disruptions at ports, Nature Climate Change 13, 804 to 806, 2023 (abstract and introduction opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  25. 18Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Ports’ criticality in international trade and global supply-chains, Nature Communications 13, 2022 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  26. 4UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption shows why early-warning data matters, news item (about 95% fall in ship transits; tracking tool described). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

References and record

Every source the edition rests on, the publication record, the corrections log and the open record.

15 min read0 figures1 table0 notesNR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

C.150 sources

NR-CIT-1, editor first. A DOI is linked where the source has one; Nexus records carry a UNI once the catalogue allocates it (NS-1).

  1. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025: Staying the course in turbulent waters (full report and overview). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 5, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  2. 2UNCTAD (ed.), Strait of Hormuz Disruptions: Implications for Global Trade and Development, rapid analysis dated 10 March 2026, from Clarksons Research, EIA, LSEG, Kpler and other data. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 5, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  3. 3UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz shipping disruptions raise risks for energy, fertilisers and vulnerable economies, media alert UNCTAD/PRESS/MA/2026/003, Geneva, 10 March 2026. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  4. 4UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption shows why early-warning data matters, news item (about 95% fall in ship transits; tracking tool described). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 4
  5. 5UN DESA Statistics Division (ed.), The Sustainable Development Goals Extended Report 2026, Goal 9 indicator storylines (inputs as of 30 April 2026). United Nations, New York. Observation year 2024 (indicators 9.1.2 and 9.a.1) and 2025 (indicator 9.c.1). Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  6. 6DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, container port traffic (TEU), series IS.SHP.GOOD.TU, API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 6
  7. 7DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, air transport passengers carried and freight (series IS.AIR.PSGR and IS.AIR.GOOD.MT.K1, ICAO source) and rail series (no values returned), API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  8. 8DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, individuals using the Internet (series IT.NET.USER.ZS, ITU source), API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6
  9. 9DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, urban population as a share of total population (series SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS, UN source), API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 6
  10. 10ITU (ed.), Measuring digital development: Facts and Figures 2026 (publication page with key findings). International Telecommunication Union, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  11. 11WHO (ed.), Global status report on road safety 2023, Geneva, 13 December 2023 (publication page). World Health Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  12. 12WHO (ed.), Road traffic injuries, fact sheet updated 20 July 2026 (about 1.16 million deaths a year; 92% in low- and middle-income countries; reference year not stated). World Health Organization, Geneva. Observation year not stated on the page. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 8
  13. 13IEA (ed.), Global Energy Review 2026 (PDF, opened from a copy of the published report hosted by a third party). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  14. 14Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J. and Rozenberg, J., Lifelines: The Resilient Infrastructure Opportunity. World Bank, Washington, 2019 (full report PDF). Observation year 2019 (analysis of earlier data). Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  15. 15Koks, E.E. et al., A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets, Nature Communications 10, 2677, 2019 (abstract via Crossref). Springer Nature. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  16. 16Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Systemic risks from climate-related disruptions at ports, Nature Climate Change 13, 804 to 806, 2023 (abstract and introduction opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 7
  17. 17Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E., Hall, J.W. et al., Multi-hazard risk to global port infrastructure and resulting trade and logistics losses, Communications Earth and Environment 4, 2023 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  18. 18Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Ports’ criticality in international trade and global supply-chains, Nature Communications 13, 2022 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  19. 19Thacker, S. et al., Infrastructure for sustainable development, Nature Sustainability 2, 324 to 331, 2019 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  20. 20ASCE (ed.), 2025 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure (summary page: overall grade C, grades from B in ports to D in stormwater and transit, USD 3.6 trillion investment gap over ten years). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  21. 21Global Infrastructure Hub (ed.), Global Infrastructure Outlook, press release of 25 July 2017 (USD 94 trillion need to 2040, USD 97 trillion with SDG access targets, USD 18 trillion unfunded). Global Infrastructure Hub, Sydney. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6
  22. 22NTSB (ed.), Contact of Containership Dali with Francis Scott Key Bridge and Subsequent Bridge Collapse, investigation page with probable cause and recommendations. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  23. 23ENISA (ed.), ENISA Transport Threat Landscape, March 2023 (publication page and report PDF; incidents January 2021 to October 2022). European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, Athens. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 5, chapter 6, chapter 8
  24. 24European Commission (ed.), Trans-European transport network (TEN-T), policy page on Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 (core network by 2030, extended core by 2040, comprehensive by 2050). Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6
  25. 25European Commission (ed.), NIS2 Directive: securing network and information systems, policy page on Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (earlier directive repealed from 18 October 2024). Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6
  26. 26IMO (ed.), Initial IMO GHG Strategy, hot topic page (notes that the 2023 strategy has been adopted). International Maritime Organization, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  27. 27DNV (ed.), Decision on the IMO Net-Zero Framework delayed for one year, news item of 2025 on the second extraordinary session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee. DNV, Oslo. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6, chapter 8
  28. 28ACI World (ed.), Biannual global air travel demand update, 30 September 2025 (9.4 billion passengers in 2024; 9.8 billion projected for 2025). Airports Council International, Montreal. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  29. 29IATA (ed.), Industry outlook press release, December 2025 (5.2 billion passengers expected in 2026, up 4.4% on 2025; cargo 71.6 million tonnes). International Air Transport Association, Montreal. Observation year 2026 (expectation). Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  30. 30IPCC, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Working Group II, Chapter 6: Cities, Settlements and Key Infrastructure (chapter PDF opened). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  31. 31WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, press release of 23 March 2026 (2025 about 1.43 °C above the 1850 to 1900 average). World Meteorological Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 8
  32. 32Autoridad del Canal de Panama (ed.), Panama Canal Authority, home page statistics (13,404 transits in 2025). Panama Canal Authority, Balboa. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 8
  33. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: IMF (ed.), PortWatch daily chokepoint transit series; the daily service returned an access error and only a static chokepoint list was read, from which no figure is used. International Monetary Fund, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.
  34. 34UNVERIFIED, not opened: ITF (ed.), ITF Transport Outlook 2023. International Transport Forum at the OECD, Paris; the page returned an access error and no figure is used. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  35. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: ICAO (ed.), Air transport statistics and The World of Air Transport; the site returned an access error and no figure from it is used. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  36. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: UNDRR (ed.), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025, Resilience Pays: Financing and Investing for our Future; the page was not accessible and no figure from search summaries is used. UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  37. 37UNVERIFIED, not opened: World Bank (ed.), Connecting to Compete 2023: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, the Logistics Performance Index; the site was not accessible and no value is used. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  38. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: IEA (ed.), Global EV Outlook 2026; the page was not accessible and figures from news summaries are not used. International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.
  39. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Directive (EU) 2022/2557 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the resilience of critical entities, Official Journal of the European Union, 2022; the legal text returned a challenge page and the transport scope is cited from a search summary. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  40. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: POST-CLOSE, context only: IMO (ed.), Marine Environment Protection Committee, extraordinary session of October 2025 and the session of October 2026 on the Net-Zero Framework; only the DNV summary [27] was opened. International Maritime Organization, London. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  41. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO 55000:2024, Asset management: vocabulary, overview and principles. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva; the page was blocked. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  42. 42UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO 28000:2022, Security and resilience: security management systems for the supply chain. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva; the page was blocked. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  43. 43UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO 22301:2019, Security and resilience: business continuity management systems. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva; the page was blocked. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  44. 44UNVERIFIED, not opened: UNCTAD (ed.), Strait of Hormuz tracking dashboard, launched April 2026; known only from search summaries. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  45. 45UNVERIFIED, not opened: ENISA (ed.), ENISA Threat Landscape 2026, published 22 September 2026; only the listing entry was read. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, Athens. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.
  46. 46UNVERIFIED, not opened: Colon, C., Hallegatte, S. and Rozenberg, J., Criticality analysis of a country’s transport network via an agent-based supply chain model, Nature Sustainability 4, 209 to 215, 2021; bibliographic record read via Crossref, abstract not read. Springer Nature. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  47. 47UNVERIFIED, not opened: Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Port disruptions due to natural disasters: Insights into port and logistics resilience, Transportation Research Part D 85, 102393, 2020; bibliographic record read via Crossref, abstract not read. Elsevier. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  48. 48UNVERIFIED, not opened: IMO (ed.), International Ship and Port Facility Security Code, 2004 (SOLAS chapter XI-2), cited from memory. International Maritime Organization, London. Observation year 2004. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  49. 49UNVERIFIED, not opened: UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2024: Navigating maritime chokepoints; named in the SDG 9 storyline [5], not opened. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  50. 50UNVERIFIED, not opened: World Bank (ed.), Rural Access Index, SDG indicator 9.1.1; the custodian storyline in the SDG Extended Report is empty and the index was not retrieved. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6

C.2Publication record

Publication

Title
Global Infrastructure and Logistics Risk & Resilience Report 2026: Baseline Edition
Series
Reports · Global Sector Series GS-09
Edition
Baseline Edition 2026 · inaugural annual
Version
v1.0.0 · draft for stewardship review
Publication ID
NR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Evidence close
30 September 2026
Publication date
October 2026
DOI
concept and version DOI at deposit

Publisher

Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), for the Nexus Consortium
Place
Toronto
Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor
Stewards
GCRI · technical truth · GRF · public meaning · GRA · capital meaning
Licence
text CC BY 4.0; data on the terms of each source
Copyright
© 2026 GCRI · Nexus Consortium
Language
English (en-GB) source edition
Correspondence
Registry correction pathway · editorial office

Colophon

Format
A4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF
Typefaces
Space Grotesk (display) · Geist (text) · IBM Plex Sans Italic (standfirsts) · IBM Plex Mono (data)
Design standard
Reports Foundational Edition, Volume I, Part VII
Accessibility
tagged PDF and HTML targets; text alternatives for every figure
Production
Reports editorial team, GCRI

Release path for this version

Table C.1Release path for this version
StepWhat happensWhen
Drafteditorial self-check complete at evidence closeOctober 2026
Steward reviewfive passes on the exact draft (keys T · M · F · N)Q4 2026
Approvalpublication authority approves the exact digestbefore release
Depositconcept and version DOI minted; registry pointer setat release
Successionthe 2027 infrastructure and logistics edition reports changes against this baseline2027
Current version
v1.0.0 draft, stewardship review
Previous edition
none, first edition of the series
Next edition
NR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2027-v1.0.0
Latest version
resolve the concept DOI or the registry record
Correction route
Registry correction pathway
Notice types
erratum · addendum · supersession · withdrawal

C.3Corrections log

0correction notices. No edition has been released yet, so none can be corrected; the log below lists each edition’s current version.

EditionVersionDateStateChangeNotice
GS-09NR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0October 2026DraftBaseline Edition 2026, inaugural annual edition,None

Notice types: erratum, addendum, supersession, withdrawal. A correction is a new version with a published notice; the earlier version stays resolvable, and no edition is ever edited in silence.

C.4Open record

This edition’s open record

Publication ID
NR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Desk identifier and series alias
NR-SEC-GS-09-2026-BL
Collection
None
DOI
Concept and version DOI at deposit, on Zenodo with DataCite metadata
Versions
Each correction is a new version (isNewVersionOf); the concept DOI resolves to the latest
Bundle
RO-Crate 1.2 with CITATION.cff, CodeMeta and PROV-O provenance; a signed manifest
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0) for original material; metadata CC0 1.0

Credit and identity

ORCID
Your iD in the deposit and the contribution record; DataCite can then add the work to your ORCID record
ROR
Your organisation by its ROR identifier, never by a typed name alone
CRediT
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualisation, Writing, review and editing
Account
None needed to contribute; never a password

Find and follow

Search the open indexes for Global Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics; software is cited by its SWHID from Software Heritage, and a quantified scenario run is preregistered on OSF before it is run. Annotation is your choice: Hypothesis opens this page in its own viewer.

Mirrors and harvest

The DOI is canonical. At release each signed bundle is also given an IPFS content identifier and a bloxberg anchor as mirrors; both are listed in the record once they exist. Zenodo exposes every record over OAI-PMH, and reviews and endorsements can arrive through COAR Notify where the repository supports it.

InvenioRDM metadata for a contribution on Global Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics, prefilled from this page
{
  "metadata": {
    "resource_type": {
      "id": "dataset"
    },
    "title": "Evidence on Global Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics for Nexus Reports",
    "publication_date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
    "creators": [
      {
        "person_or_org": {
          "type": "personal",
          "family_name": "Your family name",
          "given_name": "Your given name",
          "identifiers": [
            {
              "scheme": "orcid",
              "identifier": "0000-0000-0000-0000"
            }
          ]
        },
        "affiliations": [
          {
            "id": "ROR identifier of your organisation"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "description": "What it is, where its record is kept and how it bears on Global Infrastructure and Logistics Risk and Resilience Report 2026: Baseline Edition, The State of the World’s Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics..",
    "rights": [
      {
        "id": "cc-by-4.0"
      }
    ],
    "subjects": [
      {
        "subject": "Nexus Reports"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Global Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Global Sector Report · GS-09"
      }
    ],
    "related_identifiers": [
      {
        "identifier": "https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/editions/gs-09/",
        "scheme": "url",
        "relation_type": {
          "id": "issupplementto"
        },
        "resource_type": {
          "id": "publication-report"
        }
      }
    ],
    "version": "1.0.0"
  },
  "custom_fields": {},
  "access": {
    "record": "public",
    "files": "public"
  },
  "files": {
    "enabled": true
  },
  "parent": {
    "communities": {
      "default": "nexusreports"
    }
  }
}

C.5Where this edition sits among the six pillars

Foundry seals the evidence and Universe tests it; Reports publishes it; Standards takes its corrections and Academy teaches from it.

  1. F03 Sealed observations and indicator series Foundry Sealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
  2. F04 After-action and scenario findings for Universe After-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
  3. F05 National Portfolio movement for chapter Foundry National Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
  4. Applied in editions Standards Nexus Standards: applied in editions.
  5. GS-09 edition Reports Global Infrastructure and Logistics 2026, published in every format with its sources, citation and corrections.
  6. F06 Method and correction findings as change Standards Method and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
  7. F12 Q4 synthesis informs the next-year Universe Q4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
  8. Taught in the open Academy Risk Academy: taught in the open.

What Foundry and Universe hand to this edition, and what it hands to Standards, Universe and Academy. From the programme spine; GS-09 is a drafted Baseline Edition, so these handoffs run from its first operational quarter.

HandoffBetweenWhat crosses, and when
F03Foundry to ReportsSealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
F04Universe to ReportsAfter-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
F05Foundry to ReportsNational Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
RingNexus Standards to ReportsNexus Standards: applied in editions.
F06Reports to Nexus StandardsMethod and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
F12Reports to UniverseQ4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
RingReports to Risk AcademyRisk Academy: taught in the open.
ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Global Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the GCRI Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskGlobal Sector Risk and Resilience

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.