Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

Systems in depth

One section per system: its state at evidence close, its exposures and what the operational series will watch.

10 min read0 figures5 tables25 notesNR-XTECH-FUSION-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. ·Executive summary
  3. 1Fusion is an experiment record and a fuel-cycle question
  4. 2Key findings
  5. 3Systems and sectors at baseline
  6. 4Risks and capability
  7. 5First-plant fuel and licence set the pace
  8. 6Readings from the other desks
  9. 7The 2027 agenda
  10. 8Systems in depth
    1. 8.1 Devices and confinement platforms
    2. 8.2 Fuel cycle, tritium and energy balance
    3. 8.3 Materials, lithium and supply chain
    4. 8.4 Economy, investment and workforce
    5. 8.5 Safety, licensing and governance watch
  11. AMethodology
  12. BData appendix
  13. CReferences and record
  14. ·Complete edition, for print

8.1Devices and confinement platforms

Fusion devices confine plasma with lasers, magnets or both. Evidence is strongest where a laboratory reports a measured result, and weakest where claims rest on company plans.

4.13times

NIF target gain, 20255

69MJ

JET energy over about 5 seconds4

1,337seconds

WEST plasma duration1

Table 8.1State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Laser inertial confinementtarget gain of 4.13 on one facility; upgrade planned56Reported
TokamaksJET energy record; WEST and EAST duration records412Reported
Stellaratorslong-pulse triple product record at Wendelstein 7-X342Reported
Company devicesplant and device plans are company statements; SPARC date unverified242329Inferred

Couplings

  • INF ↔ FIN devices and funding
  • INF → ENE capability and firm power
  • MIN → INF fuel and materials

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • performance on a common basis
  • facility electricity per shot or pulse

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • XT-12 Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology
  • XT-15 Advanced Nuclear and Next-Generation Fission
  • XT-16 Advanced Energy Storage
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials

8.2Fuel cycle, tritium and energy balance

Deuterium-tritium plants need tritium, bred inside the plant from lithium, and start-up tritium from outside. Supply of both is thinly measured.

0 to 27.7kg

tritium free for fusion in 2055, scenario range20

≈25kg

civilian tritium in 2024, one commentary22

7.4%

lithium-6 in natural lithium21

Table 8.2State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Tritium supplyheavy-water reactors are the only commercial source2021Reported
Tritium inventoryabout 25 kg in 2024 in one commentary; weak evidence22Reported
Breedingblankets must reach a breeding ratio above one2139Reported
Energy balancefacility electricity per shot or pulse not bound5Expert input

Couplings

  • MIN → INF tritium supply
  • ENE ↔ INF facility power
  • WAT → INF cooling water

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • tritium inventory and start-up demand
  • facility electricity and cooling water

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • XT-12 Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology
  • XT-15 Advanced Nuclear and Next-Generation Fission
  • XT-16 Advanced Energy Storage
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials

8.3Materials, lithium and supply chain

Plants need enriched lithium, magnets, structural materials and plasma-facing components. Only lithium-6 has evidence in this edition.

30 to 90%

lithium-6 enrichment in blanket designs21

0supply

current lithium-6 supply, effectively zero21

2026preprint

lithium enrichment analysis, seen in search only33

Table 8.3State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Lithium-6supply effectively zero according to one presentation21Reported
Enrichment routescost and hazard concerns in one preprint; not opened33Inferred
Magnets and structuresnot documented in sources read41Expert input
Research facilitiesshared test facilities named in strategies1512Inferred

Couplings

  • MIN → INF lithium and materials
  • TRD → INF export controls
  • FIN → INF fabrication

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • lithium-6 capacity
  • component lifetimes and fabrication capacity

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • XT-12 Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology
  • XT-15 Advanced Nuclear and Next-Generation Fission
  • XT-16 Advanced Energy Storage
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials

8.4Economy, investment and workforce

Private funding rose to a record in the 12 months to July 2026 and public programmes expanded. Workforce numbers are the thin part of the evidence.

4.48USD billion

private funding, 12 months to July 202610

14.24USD billion

cumulative private funding10

>2.5GBP billion

UK funding over five years15

Table 8.4State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Private fundingUSD 4.48 billion in 12 months; 56 companies in the survey10Reported
Public fundingUK, German and Chinese commitments on different bases151619Reported
ProgrammesUS milestone programme funded eight companies in 202313Reported
Workforceskills programmes announced in the UK; no figure bound15Expert input

Couplings

  • FIN → INF scale-up
  • FIN → GOV public programmes
  • HLT → INF workforce

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • public funding totals
  • workforce size and skills gaps

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • XT-12 Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology
  • XT-15 Advanced Nuclear and Next-Generation Fission
  • XT-16 Advanced Energy Storage
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials

8.5Safety, licensing and governance watch

The nearest effect of fusion on other infrastructure is regulatory. The US has proposed a licensing framework, and the UK, Germany and the EU have plans.

2026proposed rule

US rule on fusion machines, 26 February 202614

2026comments

comment deadline 27 May 202614

2029submission

planned UK Development Consent Order for STEP, March 202915

Table 8.5State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
US licensingfusion machines under byproduct material rules of part 3014Reported
US planroadmap of October 2025 targets power by the mid-2030s12Reported
UK and Germanystrategy of March 2026; action plan of October 20251516Reported
EU and internationalcall for evidence in 2025; IAEA group and outlook189Reported

Couplings

  • GOV → INF licensing route
  • GOV → FIN financing conditions
  • GOV → TRD fuel transfer rules

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • final rule text
  • national waste and siting rules

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • XT-12 Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology
  • XT-15 Advanced Nuclear and Next-Generation Fission
  • XT-16 Advanced Energy Storage
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 5Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (ed.), National Ignition Facility 2025 (annual report page; 8.6 MJ on 7 April 2025 from 2.08 MJ delivered, target gain 4.13; refurbishment and enhanced yield capability to 2.6 MJ). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 4World Nuclear News (ed.), New world record set in JET final fusion experiments (news report of 9 February 2024; 69 MJ over 5 seconds from 0.2 milligrams of fuel; 59 MJ in 2021). World Nuclear Association, London. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 1CEA IRFM (ed.), WEST sets a new plasma duration record (news page; plasma 61299, 12 February 2025, 1,337 seconds, 2 MW lower hybrid heating, 2.6 GJ injected and extracted). Commissariat a l energie atomique et aux energies alternatives, Cadarache. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 6Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (ed.), NIF fusion ignition shot hailed as historic scientific feat (news page; shot of 5 December 2022, 3.15 MJ from 2.05 MJ; announced 13 December 2022). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 2Physics World (ed.), China experimental advanced superconducting tokamak smashes fusion confinement record (news report; EAST 1066 seconds in high confinement, January 2025; earlier 403 seconds in 2023). IOP Publishing, Bristol. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 3World Nuclear News (ed.), Wendelstein 7-X sets new fusion performance records (news report of 4 June 2025; long-pulse triple product held for 43 seconds; announcement by the research institute and EUROfusion; peer-reviewed article not yet published at announcement). World Nuclear Association, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 42UNVERIFIED, not opened: Beidler, C.D. et al., Demonstration of reduced neoclassical energy transport in Wendelstein 7-X, Nature 596, 221 to 226, 2021, cited from memory. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 24Helion (ed.), Orion, the first fusion power plant (company page; Malaga, Washington; construction from 2025; initial operations stated for 2028; Microsoft agreement for 50 MW; a vendor announcement, weak evidence). Helion Energy, Everett. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 23Commonwealth Fusion Systems and Eni (eds.), Eni and CFS sign over USD 1 billion power purchase agreement (joint company release of 22 September 2025; 400 MW ARC plant in Chesterfield County, Virginia; grid connection in the early 2030s; a vendor announcement, weak evidence). Commonwealth Fusion Systems, Devens. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 29UNVERIFIED, not opened: Commonwealth Fusion Systems (ed.), SPARC status, first plasma reported as a 2027 target, taken from search-result summaries and secondary pages. Commonwealth Fusion Systems, Devens. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 20Coleman, M. and Kovari, M., Global supply of tritium for fusion R and D from heavy water reactors (conference paper, UK Atomic Energy Authority; abstract and introduction read from the PDF; 0 to 27.7 kg available in 2055 across scenarios; 7.4 kg for a demonstration reactor in 2055 in one case). UK Atomic Energy Authority, Abingdon. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 22Theiding, T., Tritium: a few kilograms can make or break nuclear fusion (policy blog post of 6 March 2025; about 25 kg of civilian tritium in 2024; a student fellow commentary, weak evidence). Kleinman Center for Energy Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 21Pearson, R.J., The availability and supply of critical natural resources for the realisation of a fusion pilot plant: fuels for fusion (presentation to the US Department of Energy fusion workshop, 1 to 3 June 2022; lithium-6 is 7.4% of natural lithium; blankets need 30 to 90%; supply effectively zero; a company presentation, weak evidence). Kyoto Fusioneering, London. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Abdou, M. et al., Physics and technology considerations for the deuterium-tritium fuel cycle and conditions for tritium fuel self sufficiency, Nuclear Fusion 61, 013001, 2021, cited from memory. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: Ward, P. and colleagues, Lithium enrichment threatens to curb fusion deployment, arXiv:2605.04707, 2026, taken from search-result summaries. arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: Knaster, J., Moeslang, A. and Muroga, T., Materials research for fusion, Nature Physics 12, 424 to 434, 2016, cited from memory. Observation year 2016. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 15UK Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (ed.), A new energy revolution: the UK plan for delivering fusion energy (policy paper of 16 March 2026; over GBP 2.5 billion over five years; GBP 1.3 billion for STEP and UK Fusion Energy; the first 100,000 of 127,790 characters were read). UK Government, London. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 12US Department of Energy (ed.), Energy Department announces Fusion Science and Technology Roadmap to accelerate commercial fusion power (announcement of 16 October 2025; Build-Innovate-Grow; power on the grid by the mid-2030s; no funding commitment). US Department of Energy, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 10World Nuclear News (ed.), Fusion industry raised USD4.5 billion in past year, report says (14 July 2026; Fusion Industry Association 2026 survey: USD 4.48 billion in 12 months, USD 14.24 billion cumulative, 56 companies; an industry survey, weak evidence). World Nuclear Association, London. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 16Clean Energy Wire (ed.), German government pledges more than EUR 2 bln for nuclear fusion (news report of 2 October 2025; cabinet plan of 1 October 2025). Clean Energy Wire, Berlin. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 19American Nuclear Society (ed.), China launches fusion-focused company (news report of 30 July 2025; China Fusion Energy Co., 15 billion yuan registered capital, subsidiary of a state nuclear group; BEST tokamak in Hefei hoped for 2027). American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 13American Nuclear Society (ed.), DOE picks eight fusion companies to design pilot power plants (news report of 2 June 2023; USD 46 million milestone programme; the page was read to the paywall). American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 14US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (ed.), Federal Register notice of 26 February 2026, proposed rule on regulatory framework for fusion machines (10 CFR part 30; comments due 27 May 2026; the first 100,000 of 168,363 characters were read). Office of the Federal Register, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  24. 18European Commission (ed.), Commission launches call for evidence to support first-ever EU-wide fusion strategy (news item of 6 June 2025; call open to 1 July 2025; strategy then programmed for the end of 2025). Directorate-General for Energy, Brussels. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  25. 9World Nuclear News (ed.), Fusion entering implementation phase, says Grossi (report on the IAEA World Fusion Outlook 2025; more than 160 devices; private investment above USD 10 billion; October 2025). World Nuclear Association, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Cite this chapter

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Chapter 8: Systems in depth. In Exponential Technology Report 2026: Fusion and Frontier Energy (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-XTECH-FUSION-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Fusion and Frontier Energy.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskExponential Technology

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

Sector signature

The sectors behind Fusion and Frontier Energy.

A reading aid: the sectors the findings run through and how strongly they depend on each other.

Select corners · hover lines6 / 15 relations

Signature

Energy and its partners

Energy gives power for transport and telecoms to infrastructure (0.8), pumping and treatment to water (0.5) and fertiliser, machinery and cold chains to food (0.5).

W · E · I · F · H · B

Sectors
4 of 6
Relations
6 of 15
Coupling
0.46 share of total

Strongest relations in play

  • Energy → Infrastructure · power for transport and telecoms0.8
  • Water → Energy · cooling water and hydropower0.6
  • Water → Food · irrigation0.8
  • Infrastructure → Water · pipes, dams and treatment works0.6
Teaching values for a typical city-region, not measurements for any place. Coupling is the summed strength of the relations in play, as a share of all fifteen.
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.