Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

Readings from the other desks

The baseline is read through each steward’s lens, then once as a whole. Each lens is a projection of reviewed findings, not a separate argument. The other desks’ own editions of this subject are listed first, as cross-references, not copies.

11 min read0 figures8 tables35 notesNR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE

Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. ·Executive summary
  3. 1South Africa’s risk runs through its pipes and its grid
  4. 2Key findings
  5. 3Systems and sectors at baseline
  6. 4Risks and capability
  7. 5Power shortfall and wastewater stress in a dense province
  8. 6Readings from the other desks
    1. 6.1 The other desks’ editions of this subject
    2. 6.2 Three lenses
    3. 6.3 Standards, Academy and steward contributions
    4. 6.4 GCRI reading: the model card
    5. 6.5 Global Risks Forum reading: editorial essays
    6. 6.6 Global Risks Alliance reading: q1 2027 readiness pack
    7. 6.7 Nexus Standards reading: standards and regulatory watch
    8. 6.8 Risk Academy reading: literature and evidence review, science and assessments
  9. 7The 2027 agenda
  10. 8Systems in depth
  11. AMethodology
  12. BData appendix
  13. CReferences and record
  14. ·Complete edition, for print

6.1The other desks’ editions of this subject

Federation: each desk writes its own edition for the subjects in its remit. Until a desk releases, its edition shows its frame and the reading this edition printed for it.

DeskEditionStateIdentifier
GCRI Systems EvidenceNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
GRF Public DeliberationNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
GRA Capital ReadinessNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
Standards ProgressOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
Academy CapabilityOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
Index MeasurementNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle

6.2Three lenses

One edition, read by each steward. The lens of this site comes first.

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports a coupled reading of South Africa’s risk: the grid is steadier than in 2024, but water services are weaker, and floods have become deadly at provincial scale. Evidence is strongest for emissions, population and wastewater results, and thinnest for ecosystem condition and recovery capability.

CLI-001 · WAT-005 · ENE-003 · SYS-012

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people the risk arrives as a power cut, a water interruption or a flood warning. The baseline asks that public debate weigh how treatment failure and tariffs fall on households and towns.

WAT-006 · ENE-004 · CLI-011

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. Tariffs are up 190% since 2014 and insured flood loss is not bound5. These show where finance-readiness evidence will matter. Nothing here is advice, a rating or an endorsement.

FIN-010 · CLI-011

NEXUS

Synthesis

South Africa publishes strong open assessments of its water systems and its emissions. The 2027 programme should map grid and water dependencies, test the power-and-wastewater pathway at province scale, and bind the missing biodiversity, food-insecurity and loss series.

SYS-012 · A-01 · A-02

6.3Standards, Academy and steward contributions

How the Nexus Standards drafts, the Risk Academy and the three stewards feed each quarterly edition for South Africa. The standards are preparatory working drafts (October 2026) and are cited as drafts, never as adopted standards.

Table 6.1The quarterly rhythm every edition follows
QuarterEditionQuestionBoundary
Q1State and AgendaWhat matters this year, and what is the starting position?observed baseline stays distinct from planned work
Q2Evidence and BuildWhat new evidence and capability have been developed?a configured capability is not a validated result
Q3Stress Test and ReadinessWhat do scenarios and tests reveal?simulated loss or performance is not observed impact
Q4Annual Synthesis and RenewalWhat did the year establish, and what changes next?release follows review, not event publicity deadlines
Table 6.2Who contributes what each quarter
Steward or bodyRoleContribution route
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI Canada)Lead Institution and Consortium Secretariat; publisher of record; technical truth (key T)science and practice communities · GCRI gateway
The Global Risks Forum (GRF)leadership, dialogue and the Universe programme; public meaning (key M)policy, Universe and national adoption · GRF gateway
The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)finance, insurance and development readiness; capital meaning (key F)finance and insurance · GRA gateway
Nexus Standardspreparatory drafts on vocabulary, hazards, indicators and methodsStandards site · working groups HAZ, IND, MTH, FIN, AI
Risk Academylearning pathways tied to the agenda questionsAcademy gateway · learning by review
South Africanational pathway: Desk, Leadership Council, Consortium, Working Groupsnational Commons room

Standards drafts used in this edition

  • Risk vocabulary NRS-C1 (424 terms) for terms in the glossary
  • Hazard atlas NHS-1 1.1.0 (905 hazards in 120 families) for risk objects
  • Seven risk classes: global, catastrophic, existential, emerging, planetary, exponential, frontier-tech

Standards calendar to watch

  • Founding calls from 20 October 2026; working groups meet from 5 November 2026
  • Inaugural Global Standards Council session, 12 January 2027
  • Quarterly reviews in March, June, September and December, aligned with each edition

6.4GCRI reading: the model card

GCRI’s reading of this edition is its model card: what the national model is, what it computes and where it stops. It is printed in full in Annex A, with the methods it belongs to. Annex A, methodology

6.5Global Risks Forum reading: editorial essays

Four signed essays by the Reports editorial team set out the positions this edition takes. They are interpretation, labelled as such; the evidence they draw on is in the findings register.

The grid has improved, but almost half of wastewater systems are in a critical state. The baseline treats treatment failure as a coupling problem with power, rivers and health, not as a municipal problem alone.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 01

The weak link is wastewater

The 2022 and 2025 floods killed hundreds across two provinces. Every risk object in this edition is read through the lens of how cascading failure follows a flood.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 02

Floods are now a provincial event

A well above-average harvest is good news for supply. It does not say who can afford to eat, which the household survey must show.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 03

Supply is ample, access is not bound

Energy supplies 78% of emissions, and the grid is where reliability and decarbonisation meet. The 2035 range is a ceiling the energy system must meet while keeping the lights on.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 04

Emissions and the grid are one story

6.6Global Risks Alliance reading: q1 2027 readiness pack

The registers that open the first operational quarter. At baseline each is initialised from this edition.

Table 6.3Q1 2027 readiness pack
ItemRegisterState at baselineFirst Q1 2027 entry
E1National risk state deltabaseline set by this editionchanges against the baseline
E2WEFH+B state deltafive system readings setindicator updates and freshness
E3Agenda and Portfolio movementeight agenda items · 7 proposed objectsadmission decisions
E4NWG delivery registerno groups yetfirst monthly outputs
E5NNC capability registermembership opens in Q1 2027first contributions
E6NLC questions and challengesnone yetfirst challenge log
E7Foundry technical stateenvironment preparedfirst sealed cut
E8Publication candidatestwelve findings carried forwardPUBLISH · HOLD dispositions
E9Universe readinessone candidate missionadmission and role spine
E10Correction registernonefirst correction cycle

Publication dispositions

  • Publish
  • Hold
  • Needs evidence
  • Restricted
  • Superseded

6.7Nexus Standards reading: standards and regulatory watch

Instruments that shape the systems in this edition, by status on the retrieval date. The edition assesses no one’s compliance.

  • IN FORCE
  • ADOPTED
  • SUBMITTED
  • UNDER REVIEW
  • PUBLISHED · VOLUNTARY
Table 6.4Standards and regulatory watch
InstrumentBodyScopeStatusRelevance
Paris Agreement42 · second NDC, 2035 range 320 to 380 Mt CO₂e3UNFCCC · South AfricanationalSUBMITTED 2025emissions pathway
Climate Change Act, Act 22 of 202421Government of South AfricanationalENACTED 2024climate governance
Electricity Regulation Amendment Act, Act 38 of 202423Government of South AfricanationalENACTED 2024electricity market
Carbon Tax Act, Act 15 of 201924Government of South AfricanationalIN FORCEcarbon pricing
Disaster Management Act, Act 57 of 200225Government of South AfricanationalIN FORCEdisaster management
National Water Act, Act 36 of 199826Government of South AfricanationalIN FORCEwater resources
Just Energy Transition Investment Plan22The PresidencynationalPUBLISHED 2022transition finance
Kunming-Montreal Framework41CBDinternationalADOPTED 202230by30
Sendai Framework 2015–203040UNDRRinternationalADOPTED 2015disaster risk reduction

Changed since 2024

  • South Africa submitted its second NDC on 24 October 202534
  • The Climate Change Act was enacted in 202421
  • The Electricity Regulation Amendment Act was enacted in 202423

To watch in 2027

  • Implementation of sectoral emission targets under the Climate Change Act21
  • The Integrated Resource Plan and its updates28
  • The Green Drop special watch report on sewer networks; publication not confirmed at evidence close9

6.8Risk Academy reading: literature and evidence review, science and assessments

The review behind this edition covers peer-reviewed science, national and international assessments and the institutional reports that bind its findings. Full systematic reviews begin in Q1 2027 for each agenda item.

Review protocol

Question
What does the published evidence establish about South Africa’s coupled water, energy, food, health and biodiversity risks?
Sources searched
peer-reviewed literature; national and international assessments; official releases; industry loss data
Window
releases available at evidence close, 30 September 2026
Selection
sources that bind or contextualise a finding in this edition
Next step
systematic reviews for agenda items A-01 to A-05 in Q1 2027
Table 6.5Science and assessments
ReferenceTypeYearRoleUsed for
IPCC Synthesis Report39assessment2023contextforcing
IPBES nexus assessment45assessment2024frameworknexus interlinkages
Zscheischler et al.46journal article2018frameworkcompound events
Trisos et al.19assessment chapter2022supportsAfrican impacts
Pinto et al.16attribution study2022supportsKwaZulu-Natal rainfall
State of the Climate in Africa35WMO2025contextregional climate
Table 6.6Institutional reports
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
National inventory 2000–20222DFFE2025supportsemissions
Second NDC3Government of South Africa2025supportstargets
Country Climate and Development Report20World Bank2022contextpathways
Global Assessment Report37UNDRR2025contextdisaster risk
Africa Energy Outlook36IEA2022contextenergy access
Table 6.7Official statistics and national sources
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Mid-year population estimates1Stats SA2026supportsprofile and health
Crop monitoring7FAO GIEWS2026supportsfood
Electricity statistics5CSIR2025supportsgrid
Green, Blue and No Drop89DWS2026supportswater
Country profile6Ember2025supportspower mix
World Health Statistics47WHO2025contextpeer health data
Table 6.8Industry, loss data and international sources
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Article IV consultation11IMF2026contextmacro
NatCatSERVICE44Munich Re2026contextglobal losses
Financial Stability Review29SARB2026listedfinance
Budget Review30National Treasury2026listedpublic finance
Integrated Resource Plan28Department of Electricity and Energy2025listedpower plan

Where the evidence agrees

  • Extreme rainfall events in southern Africa are in the scientific record1619
  • The energy sector dominates national emissions2
  • Cape Town’s 2018 water crisis was averted by demand reduction18

Where it is unsettled

  • How much of the grid’s improvement in 2025 is demand-side rather than supply-side5
  • How fast wastewater systems can be restored to compliance9
  • How much of food insecurity is a matter of access rather than supply738

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 5Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ed.), “Loadshedding down 82% in H1 2025 as demand eases and EAF edges up, but tariffs still exceed inflation.” CSIR, Pretoria, 2025.back
  2. 42UNFCCC (ed.), Paris Agreement. United Nations, Paris, 2015.back
  3. 3Government of South Africa (ed.), Second Nationally Determined Contribution. Submission to the UNFCCC, 24 October 2025.back
  4. 21Government of South Africa (ed.), Climate Change Act, Act 22 of 2024. Pretoria, 2024.back
  5. 23Government of South Africa (ed.), Electricity Regulation Amendment Act, Act 38 of 2024. Pretoria, 2024.back
  6. 24Government of South Africa (ed.), Carbon Tax Act, Act 15 of 2019. Pretoria, 2019.back
  7. 25Government of South Africa (ed.), Disaster Management Act, Act 57 of 2002. Pretoria, 2002.back
  8. 26Government of South Africa (ed.), National Water Act, Act 36 of 1998. Pretoria, 1998.back
  9. 22The Presidency of South Africa (ed.), South Africa’s Just Energy Transition Investment Plan (JET IP) 2023–2027. Pretoria, 2022.back
  10. 41Convention on Biological Diversity (ed.), Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, Decision 15/4. CBD Secretariat, Montreal, 2022.back
  11. 40UNDRR (ed.), Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. UNDRR, Geneva, 2015.back
  12. 4Climate Action Tracker (ed.), “South Africa: 2035 NDC.” Climate Analytics and NewClimate Institute, December 2025.back
  13. 28Department of Electricity and Energy (ed.), Integrated Resource Plan 2025. Pretoria, 2025.back
  14. 9Parliamentary Monitoring Group (ed.), “Green, Blue and No Drop Reports 2025: Ministry briefing,” Portfolio Committee on Water and Sanitation, 9 June 2026. PMG, Cape Town, 2026.back
  15. 39H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.), Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. IPCC, Geneva, 2023.back
  16. 45P. D. McElwee, P. A. Harrison, T. L. van Huysen et al. (eds.), Thematic Assessment Report on the Interlinkages among Biodiversity, Water, Food and Health. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054back
  17. 46J. Zscheischler, S. Westra, B. J. J. M. van den Hurk et al., “Future climate risk from compound events,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 8, pp. 469–477, 2018.back
  18. 19C. H. Trisos, I. O. Adelekan, E. Totin et al., “Africa,” in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, 2022.back
  19. 16I. Pinto et al., Rapid attribution study of the April 2022 heavy rainfall in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. World Weather Attribution, 2022.back
  20. 35World Meteorological Organization (ed.), State of the Climate in Africa 2024. WMO, Geneva, 2025.back
  21. 2Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (ed.), GHG Inventory for South Africa: 2000–2022, 9th National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report. DFFE, Pretoria, 2025.back
  22. 20World Bank (ed.), South Africa Country Climate and Development Report. World Bank Group, Washington DC, 2022.back
  23. 37UNDRR (ed.), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025. UNDRR, Geneva, 2025.back
  24. 36International Energy Agency (ed.), Africa Energy Outlook 2022. IEA, Paris, 2022.back
  25. 1Statistics South Africa (ed.), Mid-year population estimates 2026, Statistical release P0302. Stats SA, Pretoria, July 2026.back
  26. 7Food and Agriculture Organization (ed.), GIEWS Country Brief: South Africa, reference date 22 April 2026. FAO, Rome, 2026.back
  27. 8Department of Water and Sanitation (ed.), Green Drop, Blue Drop and No Drop reports 2025, released 31 March 2026. DWS, Pretoria, 2026.back
  28. 6Ember (ed.), “South Africa: electricity country profile, 2025.” Ember, London, retrieved 2026-11-03.back
  29. 47World Health Organization (ed.), World Health Statistics 2025. WHO, Geneva, 2025.back
  30. 11International Monetary Fund (ed.), South Africa: 2025 Article IV Consultation, Country Report. IMF, Washington DC, February 2026.back
  31. 44Munich Re (ed.), Natural disasters in 2025: NatCatSERVICE full-year figures. Munich Re, Munich, January 2026.back
  32. 29South African Reserve Bank (ed.), Financial Stability Review. SARB, Pretoria, 2026.back
  33. 30National Treasury (ed.), Budget Review 2026. National Treasury, Pretoria, 2026.back
  34. 18H. Muller, “Cape Town’s drought: don’t blame climate change,” Nature, vol. 559, pp. 174–176, 2018.back
  35. 38Statistics South Africa (ed.), General Household Survey 2023, Statistical release P0318. Stats SA, Pretoria, 2024.back

Cite this chapter

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Chapter 6: Readings from the other desks. In South Africa Systems Risk and Resilience Report 2026: The State of South Africa’s Interdependent Systems (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on South Africa.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the GCRI Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskCountry Systems Risk and Resilience

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.