Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

  • Reports
  • Baseline Edition 2026
  • Complete edition

South Africa Systems Risk and Resilience Report 2026

The State of South Africa’s Interdependent Systems

Edition home

Choose A4 or Letter in the print dialog; running heads and page numbers are added in print. This is a review copy: the signed PDF with its DOI is issued at release.

ReportsZAF

Country Systems Risk and Resilience

South Africa 2026

The State of South Africa’s Interdependent Systems

Baseline Edition 2026NR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINEGCRI for the Nexus Consortium

Imprint

Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor, the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI)
Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) for the Nexus Consortium, Toronto
Report number
NR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE
Evidence close
30 September 2026, cut NQ-ZAF-2026-Q0-1
Status
Draft under stewardship review; not yet released
DOI and UNI
Issued at deposit
Licence
CC BY 4.0 for Nexus-authored text, tables and figures; third-party material keeps its own licence
Cite as
Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). South Africa Systems Risk and Resilience Report 2026: The State of South Africa’s Interdependent Systems (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI). https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/editions/zaf/

Contents

  1. ·

    Executive summary

  2. 1

    Chapter 1. South Africa’s risk runs through its pipes and its grid

  3. 2

    Chapter 2. Key findings

  4. 3

    Chapter 3. Systems and sectors at baseline

  5. 4

    Chapter 4. Risks and capability

  6. 5

    Chapter 5. Power shortfall and wastewater stress in a dense province

  7. 6

    Chapter 6. Readings from the other desks

  8. 7

    Chapter 7. The 2027 agenda

  9. 8

    Chapter 8. Systems in depth

  10. A

    Annex A. Methodology

  11. B

    Annex B. Data appendix

  12. C

    Annex C. References and record

Executive summary

The edition on a few pages: the abstract, the key messages, the headline finding and what each steward reads in it.

5 min read1 figure0 tables11 notesNR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE

S.1Abstract

South Africa enters 2027 as a middle-income economy of 63.5 million people whose water and electricity systems are under strain, whose food supply is currently ample, and whose floods have become deadly at provincial scale171415. Greenhouse-gas emissions were about 478 Mt CO₂e in 2022 excluding land use, with energy supplying 78% of the total2. The second climate contribution, submitted on 24 October 2025, sets a 2035 range of 320 to 380 Mt CO₂e including land use, and the Climate Action Tracker rates it insufficient34. Energy shed by load-shedding fell 82% between the first halves of 2024 and 2025, while the Eskom fleet energy availability factor stayed near 58% and tariffs have risen 190% since 20145. Water is the nearer constraint. In the 2025 Green Drop assessment 47% of 848 wastewater systems were in a critical state, and non-revenue water was 47.3%89. The 2025 maize harvest was well above average and the 2026 forecast is 17.1 million tonnes7. Floods killed 459 people in KwaZulu-Natal in 2022 and, by the provincial count, 102 in the Eastern Cape in 20251415. About 7.8 million people were living with HIV in 2026, and life expectancy at birth was 65.5 years for men and 71.0 for women1. This Baseline Edition fixes the reference state for South Africa’s water, energy, food, health and biodiversity systems, maps the couplings through which grid, water and flood shocks travel, and sets the questions the first operational edition will answer with Foundry evidence in Q1 2027. It reads against peer distributions and thresholds, and it decides nothing.

S.2Key messages

Six readings that frame the South Africa baseline, and the eight questions this edition answers, each with its status and source.

  1. About 478 Mt CO₂e in 2022 excluding land use, 78% from energy.2

    Where do emissions stand?Reported

  2. A 2035 range of 320 to 380 Mt CO₂e including land use, submitted in October 2025.34

    What has South Africa committed to?Reported

  3. Load-shedding energy fell 82% in a year, but fleet availability stayed near 58%.5

    How secure is electricity?Reported

  4. 47% of wastewater systems were in a critical state in the 2025 assessment.89

    How sound are water services?Reported

  5. Supply is ample now: the 2025 harvest was well above average and 2026 is forecast at 17.1 million tonnes.7

    Is food supply secure?Reported

  6. 459 deaths in KwaZulu-Natal in 2022 and 102 in the Eastern Cape in 2025.1415

    What do floods cost in lives?Reported

  7. Headline figures from the 2025 assessment are not bound in this edition.13

    What is the state of biodiversity?Not bound

  8. A power shortfall in a dense province with wastewater systems already in a critical state. SCN-ZAF-PWR-01

    What will Q1 2027 test first?Expert input

S.3Headline finding

ReportedEQL 4NRF-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-WAT-005

In the 2025 Green Drop assessment 47% of 848 wastewater treatment systems were in a critical state, up from 39%, and systems rated excellent or good fell from 14% to 8%.

Figure S.1Wastewater systems by Green Drop result (% of systems)
ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
Critical, previous assessment39
Critical, 2025 assessment47
Excellent or good, previous14
Excellent or good, 20258

Source: Department of Water and Sanitation Green Drop results, read in the parliamentary record of the ministry briefing of 9 June 20269.

Critical systems discharge poorly treated effluent to rivers that downstream towns, farms and ecosystems depend on. Treatment also needs reliable power, so the result links the water system to the grid. Reading the finding against provincial results matters: the critical share rose in KwaZulu-Natal, Gauteng and the Eastern Cape, and fell in Limpopo and Mpumalanga9.

S.4At a glance

63.5million

population, mid-20261

10.7%

aged 60 or over, 20261

478Mt CO₂e

emissions excl. land use, 20222

7.8million

people living with HIV, 20261

65.5 · 71.0years

life expectancy, men · women, 20261

9provinces

25.7% of people live in Gauteng1

S.5What each steward reads in it

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports a coupled reading of South Africa’s risk: the grid is steadier than in 2024, but water services are weaker, and floods have become deadly at provincial scale.

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people the risk arrives as a power cut, a water interruption or a flood warning.

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. Tariffs are up 190% since 2014 and insured flood loss is not bound.

NEXUS

Synthesis

South Africa publishes strong open assessments of its water systems and its emissions.

S.6What this edition is, and is not

What this edition is

A baseline: the state of South Africa’s water, energy, food, health and biodiversity systems in 2026, the dependencies that connect them, the risks that travel through them and the capabilities that hold them. It sets out the questions the operational series will answer.

What it is not

Not a national risk assessment, an official warning or a rating. It decides nothing about any institution or asset. Competent authorities keep every mandate they hold, and national ownership of the series is unaffected.

What comes next

Q1 2027 opens the operational series with a sealed Foundry evidence cut. Each later edition reports what changed against this baseline, new observations, source revisions, method changes, scenario updates and corrections.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1Statistics South Africa (ed.), Mid-year population estimates 2026, Statistical release P0302. Stats SA, Pretoria, July 2026.back
  2. 7Food and Agriculture Organization (ed.), GIEWS Country Brief: South Africa, reference date 22 April 2026. FAO, Rome, 2026.back
  3. 14Bloomberg (ed.), “Death toll from flooding in South Africa’s KZN rises to 459.” Bloomberg News, 29 May 2022.back
  4. 15Eastern Cape Provincial Government (ed.), flood recovery update reporting 102 flood-related deaths. Reported by Pondoland Times, Eastern Cape, 2025.back
  5. 2Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (ed.), GHG Inventory for South Africa: 2000–2022, 9th National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report. DFFE, Pretoria, 2025.back
  6. 3Government of South Africa (ed.), Second Nationally Determined Contribution. Submission to the UNFCCC, 24 October 2025.back
  7. 4Climate Action Tracker (ed.), “South Africa: 2035 NDC.” Climate Analytics and NewClimate Institute, December 2025.back
  8. 5Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ed.), “Loadshedding down 82% in H1 2025 as demand eases and EAF edges up, but tariffs still exceed inflation.” CSIR, Pretoria, 2025.back
  9. 8Department of Water and Sanitation (ed.), Green Drop, Blue Drop and No Drop reports 2025, released 31 March 2026. DWS, Pretoria, 2026.back
  10. 9Parliamentary Monitoring Group (ed.), “Green, Blue and No Drop Reports 2025: Ministry briefing,” Portfolio Committee on Water and Sanitation, 9 June 2026. PMG, Cape Town, 2026.back
  11. 13South African National Biodiversity Institute (ed.), National Biodiversity Assessment 2025: summary of findings and key messages. SANBI, Pretoria, launched 9 December 2025.back

South Africa’s risk runs through its pipes and its grid

Part I describes systems and their couplings. It assesses no authority and ranks no province.

6 min read2 figures2 tables15 notesNR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE

1.1The questions this part answers

Key questions

  • Where is South Africa’s risk concentrated, and in which systems?
  • Which couplings carry shocks from one system to the next?
  • Which capabilities hold under compound stress, and which are only documented?
  • What must the 2027 programme measure first?

In this part

  • Narrative
  • Headline finding
  • Lead figure
  • Five system chapters
  • Twelve-domain reading
  • Sector screens
  • Dependency matrix
  • Risk objects
  • Capability ladder
  • Scenario
  • Three lenses
  • Portfolio

1.2The argument

South Africa is an upper-middle-income economy of 63.5 million people, with a population that is concentrated in a few provinces: Gauteng alone holds 25.7%1. This baseline reads its exposure as three forces acting together: an electricity system that has only recently stopped shedding load at scale, water services in many places in poor condition, and extreme rainfall that now causes deaths at provincial scale.

The grid has improved in one respect. Energy shed by load-shedding fell by 82% between the first halves of 2024 and 2025, to 749 GWh5. The fleet energy availability factor stayed near 58%, tariffs have risen 190% since 2014, and fossil fuels still supplied 83% of electricity in 2025 on the Ember profile56. The second climate contribution sets a 2035 range of 320 to 380 Mt CO₂e including land use34.

Water services are the weaker link. In the 2025 Green Drop assessment 47% of 848 wastewater systems were in a critical state, up from 39%, and only 8% were rated excellent or good89. Non-revenue water was 47.3%, and Gauteng alone lost about 431 billion litres a year9. Drinking-water quality was reported as generally stable, with 8% of systems in critical risk9.

The climate layer adds loss of life. The April 2022 floods in KwaZulu-Natal killed 459 people, and the June 2025 floods in the Eastern Cape killed 102 by the provincial count1415. A rapid attribution study of the 2022 rainfall and a study of the 2015 to 2017 Western Cape drought show that both extremes are in the scientific record1617.

Food supply is the system in better shape today. The 2025 maize harvest was well above average, and the 2026 harvest is forecast at 17.1 million tonnes, which would be the third-largest on record7. Household food insecurity is not bound in this edition, because the household survey was not retrieved38.

This edition therefore reads South Africa’s risk as a property of the couplings between grid, water and weather. The matrix, risk objects, capability ladder and scenario that follow ask the same two questions: where does a shock travel next, and who holds the capability to stop it?

Figure 1.1Where do South Africa’s emissions come from? Emissions by sector, 2022 (Mt CO₂e)

Energy was 374.1 Mt of about 478 Mt excluding land use. Land use removed 43.2 Mt, which brings the total to about 435 Mt including land use2.

ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
Energy374.1
Agriculture52.9
Industrial processes and product use30.6
Waste20.7

Source: as cited in the note to this figure. Year 2022.

Figure ID FIG-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-01-003

374.1Mt CO₂e

energy sector, 20222

43.2Mt CO₂e

land-use sink, 20222

−2.2%

change in total excl. land use since 2000 (ESTIMATED)2

2050net zero

long-term goal named in the tracker analysis4

1.3Twenty couplings between five systems

The South Africa matrix types the twenty couplings between the five core systems. Strengths are Nexus estimates from the cited evidence and analogue events; they set the starting graph that the Q1 2027 Foundry cut will test.

Figure 1.2Couplings between the five systems

Each line is one coupling from one system to another, drawn by the strength the edition assigns. Strengths are Nexus estimates from the cited evidence and analogue events.

  • Strong
  • Moderate
  • Weak

Source: this edition’s coupling matrix (Table 1.1); status Estimated.

Table 1.1Coupling matrix: from the row system to the column system
From, toWATENEFOOHLTBIO
WAT Water·STRONG
nuclear cooling · hydro
STRONG
irrigation · rain-fed yield
MODERATE
drinking water
STRONG
flows · wetlands
ENE EnergyMODERATE
pumping · treatment
·STRONG
fuel · fertiliser · cold chain
STRONG
facility power · cooling
MODERATE
reservoirs · land use
FOO FoodMODERATE
withdrawals · nutrients
WEAK
biofuel feedstock
·STRONG
nutrition · food safety
STRONG
land conversion
HLT HealthWEAK
workforce
WEAK
workforce
MODERATE
labour · disease
·WEAK
residues
BIO BiodiversitySTRONG
regulation · filtration
MODERATE
fire on lines · biomass
STRONG
pollination · soils
MODERATE
zoonoses · smoke
·
Strength: strong, moderate or weak; a Nexus estimate (status Estimated) from cited evidence and analogue events. The scale is defined in Annex A.

Transmission paths

  1. 01

    ENE → WAT → HLT

    A supply shortfall interrupts pumping and treatment, and exposure to untreated water rises.

    Inferred grid and Green Drop evidence59

  2. 02

    CLI → WAT → INF

    Heavy rain damages treatment works and roads.

    Reported KwaZulu-Natal 202214

  3. 03

    CLI → INF → FOO

    Flooded roads delay distribution to affected districts.

    Inferred Eastern Cape 202515

  4. 04

    CLI → WAT → FOO

    Multi-year drought forces water restrictions on cities and farms.

    Reported Western Cape 2015–20171718

  5. 05

    ENE → FIN

    Tariff rises load household and municipal budgets.

    Reported tariffs up 190% since 20145

1.4Reinforcing loops

A shock entering either system of a loop can return amplified through the other.

Table 1.2Pairs of systems where both directions are rated strong
LoopFirst directionSecond direction
WAT and BIOWater to biodiversity: flows · wetlandsBiodiversity to water: regulation · filtration
FOO and BIOFood to biodiversity: land conversionBiodiversity to food: pollination · soils
A causal-loop reading of the matrix (Sterman, Business Dynamics, 2000): structural, from estimated strengths, not a measured feedback.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1Statistics South Africa (ed.), Mid-year population estimates 2026, Statistical release P0302. Stats SA, Pretoria, July 2026.back
  2. 5Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ed.), “Loadshedding down 82% in H1 2025 as demand eases and EAF edges up, but tariffs still exceed inflation.” CSIR, Pretoria, 2025.back
  3. 6Ember (ed.), “South Africa: electricity country profile, 2025.” Ember, London, retrieved 2026-11-03.back
  4. 3Government of South Africa (ed.), Second Nationally Determined Contribution. Submission to the UNFCCC, 24 October 2025.back
  5. 4Climate Action Tracker (ed.), “South Africa: 2035 NDC.” Climate Analytics and NewClimate Institute, December 2025.back
  6. 8Department of Water and Sanitation (ed.), Green Drop, Blue Drop and No Drop reports 2025, released 31 March 2026. DWS, Pretoria, 2026.back
  7. 9Parliamentary Monitoring Group (ed.), “Green, Blue and No Drop Reports 2025: Ministry briefing,” Portfolio Committee on Water and Sanitation, 9 June 2026. PMG, Cape Town, 2026.back
  8. 14Bloomberg (ed.), “Death toll from flooding in South Africa’s KZN rises to 459.” Bloomberg News, 29 May 2022.back
  9. 15Eastern Cape Provincial Government (ed.), flood recovery update reporting 102 flood-related deaths. Reported by Pondoland Times, Eastern Cape, 2025.back
  10. 16I. Pinto et al., Rapid attribution study of the April 2022 heavy rainfall in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. World Weather Attribution, 2022.back
  11. 17F. E. L. Otto, P. Wolski, F. Lehner et al., “Anthropogenic influence on the drivers of the Western Cape drought 2015–2017,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 13, 2018.back
  12. 7Food and Agriculture Organization (ed.), GIEWS Country Brief: South Africa, reference date 22 April 2026. FAO, Rome, 2026.back
  13. 38Statistics South Africa (ed.), General Household Survey 2023, Statistical release P0318. Stats SA, Pretoria, 2024.back
  14. 2Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (ed.), GHG Inventory for South Africa: 2000–2022, 9th National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report. DFFE, Pretoria, 2025.back
  15. 18H. Muller, “Cape Town’s drought: don’t blame climate change,” Nature, vol. 559, pp. 174–176, 2018.back

Key findings

Twelve findings carry the baseline. They are grouped by system, never ranked. Each resolves to its source or, where Nexus analysis is involved, to its stated method.

4 min read1 figure0 tables14 notesNR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE

2.1Headline finding

ReportedEQL 4NRF-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-WAT-005

In the 2025 Green Drop assessment 47% of 848 wastewater treatment systems were in a critical state, up from 39%, and systems rated excellent or good fell from 14% to 8%.

Figure 2.1Wastewater systems by Green Drop result (% of systems)
ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
Critical, previous assessment39
Critical, 2025 assessment47
Excellent or good, previous14
Excellent or good, 20258

Source: Department of Water and Sanitation Green Drop results, read in the parliamentary record of the ministry briefing of 9 June 20269.

Implication

Critical systems discharge poorly treated effluent to rivers that downstream towns, farms and ecosystems depend on. Treatment also needs reliable power, so the result links the water system to the grid. Reading the finding against provincial results matters: the critical share rose in KwaZulu-Natal, Gauteng and the Eastern Cape, and fell in Limpopo and Mpumalanga9.

What would move it

The next Green Drop special watch report on sewer networks and pump stations, municipal turnaround evidence, and electricity supply to treatment works would each move this finding.

2.2Climate forcing

  1. ReportedEQL 5NRF-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-CLI-001

    Greenhouse-gas emissions were about 478 Mt CO₂e in 2022 excluding land use, and land use was a sink of 43.2 Mt CO₂e; energy supplied 78% of the total excluding land use.2

  2. ReportedEQL 4NRF-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-CLI-002

    The second climate contribution, submitted on 24 October 2025, sets a 2035 range of 320 to 380 Mt CO₂e including land use and names net zero for 2050; the Climate Action Tracker rates it insufficient.34

  3. ReportedEQL 3NRF-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-CLI-011

    The April 2022 floods in KwaZulu-Natal killed 459 people, and the June 2025 floods in the Eastern Cape killed 102 by the provincial count.1415

2.3Energy

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-ENE-003

    Energy shed by load-shedding fell 82% between the first halves of 2024 and 2025, to 749 GWh, while the Eskom fleet energy availability factor was 58%.5

  2. ReportedEQL 3NRF-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-ENE-004

    Fossil fuels supplied 83% of electricity in 2025 on the Ember country profile, and solar and wind 13%; national tariffs have risen 190% since 2014.56

2.4Water

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-WAT-005

    In the 2025 Green Drop assessment 47% of 848 wastewater systems were in a critical state, up from 39%, and systems rated excellent or good fell from 14% to 8%.89

  2. ReportedEQL 4NRF-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-WAT-006

    Non-revenue water was 47.3% nationally in the 2025 assessment, close to the 47.4% of 2023, and Gauteng lost about 431 billion litres a year.910

2.5Food

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-FOO-007

    The 2025 maize harvest was well above average and the 2026 harvest is forecast at 17.1 million tonnes, with cereals at about 19.5 million tonnes.7

2.6Health

  1. ReportedEQL 5NRF-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-HLT-008

    About 7.8 million people were living with HIV in 2026, and life expectancy at birth was 65.5 years for men and 71.0 for women; 10.7% of the population was 60 or over.1

2.7Biodiversity

  1. Not boundEQL 1NRF-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-BIO-009

    The 2025 National Biodiversity Assessment was launched on 9 December 2025. Its headline figures are not bound in this edition.13

2.8Finance

  1. ReportedEQL 3NRF-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-FIN-010

    The IMF projects real GDP growth of 1.1% for 2026, and the 2026 electricity tariff increase of 8.76% compares with a 4.5% inflation forecast.512

2.9Systemic

  1. Expert inputEQL 2NRF-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-SYS-012

    The leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is a power shortfall in a dense province whose wastewater systems are already in a critical state, with heavy rain added. §9.3

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 9Parliamentary Monitoring Group (ed.), “Green, Blue and No Drop Reports 2025: Ministry briefing,” Portfolio Committee on Water and Sanitation, 9 June 2026. PMG, Cape Town, 2026.back
  2. 2Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (ed.), GHG Inventory for South Africa: 2000–2022, 9th National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report. DFFE, Pretoria, 2025.back
  3. 3Government of South Africa (ed.), Second Nationally Determined Contribution. Submission to the UNFCCC, 24 October 2025.back
  4. 4Climate Action Tracker (ed.), “South Africa: 2035 NDC.” Climate Analytics and NewClimate Institute, December 2025.back
  5. 14Bloomberg (ed.), “Death toll from flooding in South Africa’s KZN rises to 459.” Bloomberg News, 29 May 2022.back
  6. 15Eastern Cape Provincial Government (ed.), flood recovery update reporting 102 flood-related deaths. Reported by Pondoland Times, Eastern Cape, 2025.back
  7. 5Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ed.), “Loadshedding down 82% in H1 2025 as demand eases and EAF edges up, but tariffs still exceed inflation.” CSIR, Pretoria, 2025.back
  8. 6Ember (ed.), “South Africa: electricity country profile, 2025.” Ember, London, retrieved 2026-11-03.back
  9. 8Department of Water and Sanitation (ed.), Green Drop, Blue Drop and No Drop reports 2025, released 31 March 2026. DWS, Pretoria, 2026.back
  10. 10Department of Water and Sanitation (ed.), Blue Drop, Green Drop and No Drop reports 2023, released 5 December 2023. DWS, Pretoria, 2023.back
  11. 7Food and Agriculture Organization (ed.), GIEWS Country Brief: South Africa, reference date 22 April 2026. FAO, Rome, 2026.back
  12. 1Statistics South Africa (ed.), Mid-year population estimates 2026, Statistical release P0302. Stats SA, Pretoria, July 2026.back
  13. 13South African National Biodiversity Institute (ed.), National Biodiversity Assessment 2025: summary of findings and key messages. SANBI, Pretoria, launched 9 December 2025.back
  14. 12International Monetary Fund (ed.), World Economic Outlook Update, July 2026. IMF, Washington DC, 2026.back

Systems and sectors at baseline

4 min read0 figures2 tables10 notesNR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE

3.1Where each system stood at evidence close

WAT · Water

Wastewater systems in a critical state

47%

Up from 39%. Systems rated excellent or good fell from 14% to 8%.

Reported2025 (released 2026)DWS via PMG9

ENE · Energy

Energy shed by load-shedding, first half

749GWh

Down from 4,126 GWh in the first half of 2024. Fleet energy availability was 58%.

Reported2025CSIR5

FOO · Food

Maize harvest, forecast

17.1million t

The third-largest on record if realised. The 2025 harvest was well above average.

Reported2026FAO GIEWS7

HLT · Health

People living with HIV

7.8million

Life expectancy at birth is 65.5 years for men and 71.0 for women.

Reported2026Stats SA1

BIO · Biodiversity

Ecosystem threat status, national

Not bound

Source: SANBI National Biodiversity Assessment 202513. Blocker: the assessment site refused automated access at evidence close.

Not bound2025SANBI13

SYS · Cross-system

Deaths in the Eastern Cape floods, provincial count

102deaths

KwaZulu-Natal recorded 459 deaths in the April 2022 floods.

Reported2025provincial report15

3.2Domain posture

Each of the twelve coupled domains is read in words, not scored. The coupling column names the dependency that carries risk into other systems.

Table 3.1Each domain read in words, not scored
DomainPosture at baselineCouplingStatus
WATMany wastewater systems in a critical state; non-revenue water 47.3%; drinking-water quality reported as generally stable.WAT → HLT · WAT ↔ ENEReported EQL 4
ENELoad-shedding energy down 82%; fleet availability near 58%; fossil fuels 83% of electricity.ENE → allReported EQL 4
FOOWell above-average 2025 harvest; ample maize supply in 2026.FOO ← CLI, ENEReported EQL 4
HLTAbout 7.8 million people living with HIV; life expectancy 65.5 and 71.0 years.HLT ← WAT, ENEReported EQL 5
BIOHeadline figures of the 2025 assessment not bound.BIO ↔ WAT, FOONot bound EQL 1
CLIDeadly floods in 2022 and 2025; drought of 2015 to 2017 in the Western Cape.forcing on all systemsReported EQL 3
INFAgeing water networks and a stressed grid; roads cut in floods.INF → allInferred EQL 3
FINTariffs up 190% since 2014; modest growth projected; insured flood loss not bound.FIN ← CLI, ENEReported EQL 3
DATDigital dependencies of lifelines not mapped at public-safe resolution.DAT → ENE, FINExpert input EQL 2
AICData-centre and compute demand on power and water not bound in this edition.AIC → ENE, WATExpert input EQL 2
MINMining linkages to power and water not bound in this edition.MIN → ENE, WATExpert input EQL 2
TRDWheat imported; maize exported; fuel and equipment imports not bound.TRD → ENE, FOOInferred EQL 2

3.3Sector screens

All sixteen sectors are screened on the same grammar, so that later editions can say what changed. The evidence column describes coverage of the baseline evidence, not the performance of the sector.

Table 3.2Sectors: baseline evidence and the exposure to watch
CodeSectorBaseline evidenceExposure to watchEvidence coverage
GS-00Cross-systemcompound grid, water and flood stresspower shortfall with failing wastewater systemsPARTIAL
GS-01Water47% of wastewater systems critical9treatment failure; pipe lossPARTIAL
GS-02Energyload-shedding down 82%5fleet availability; tariff pathPARTIAL
GS-03Foodample maize supply7drought; logisticsPARTIAL
GS-04Health7.8 million people living with HIV1service continuity in outagesPARTIAL
GS-05Financetariffs up 190% since 20145flood loss; municipal financeTHIN
GS-06Developmentpopulation concentrated in three provinces1service delivery gapsTHIN
GS-07Climate2035 range submitted3extreme rain and droughtPARTIAL
GS-08Disasterfloods with provincial death tolls1415warning to response chainTHIN
GS-09Infrastructurecritical wastewater systems9maintenance backlogPARTIAL
GS-10CitiesGauteng holds 25.7% of people1urban supply lossTHIN
GS-11Biodiversity2025 assessment launched13headline figures not boundTHIN
GS-12Earth observationnot reviewedcontinuityTHIN
GS-13Cyber and digitaldependencies not yet mappedsystemic outagesTHIN
GS-14PolicyClimate Change Act in place21coordination across spheres of governmentPARTIAL
GS-15Sciencenational inventory and assessments published213translation to provincesPARTIAL

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 9Parliamentary Monitoring Group (ed.), “Green, Blue and No Drop Reports 2025: Ministry briefing,” Portfolio Committee on Water and Sanitation, 9 June 2026. PMG, Cape Town, 2026.back
  2. 5Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ed.), “Loadshedding down 82% in H1 2025 as demand eases and EAF edges up, but tariffs still exceed inflation.” CSIR, Pretoria, 2025.back
  3. 7Food and Agriculture Organization (ed.), GIEWS Country Brief: South Africa, reference date 22 April 2026. FAO, Rome, 2026.back
  4. 1Statistics South Africa (ed.), Mid-year population estimates 2026, Statistical release P0302. Stats SA, Pretoria, July 2026.back
  5. 13South African National Biodiversity Institute (ed.), National Biodiversity Assessment 2025: summary of findings and key messages. SANBI, Pretoria, launched 9 December 2025.back
  6. 15Eastern Cape Provincial Government (ed.), flood recovery update reporting 102 flood-related deaths. Reported by Pondoland Times, Eastern Cape, 2025.back
  7. 3Government of South Africa (ed.), Second Nationally Determined Contribution. Submission to the UNFCCC, 24 October 2025.back
  8. 14Bloomberg (ed.), “Death toll from flooding in South Africa’s KZN rises to 459.” Bloomberg News, 29 May 2022.back
  9. 21Government of South Africa (ed.), Climate Change Act, Act 22 of 2024. Pretoria, 2024.back
  10. 2Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (ed.), GHG Inventory for South Africa: 2000–2022, 9th National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report. DFFE, Pretoria, 2025.back

Risks and capability

Four risk objects open the portfolio. Order carries no rank. Each is read across driver, exposure, vulnerability, capacity, cascade and consequence.

3 min read0 figures1 table10 notesNR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE

4.1Risk objects

Each risk is read across the chain from hazard to consequence, with its status and evidence-quality level.

  1. ReportedEQL 3RSK-ZAF-CLI-001

    Heavy-rain flooding in a populated province

    Driver
    intense rainfall and cut-off lows
    Exposure
    informal settlements, roads, river corridors
    Vulnerability
    dense low-lying housing; damaged networks
    Capacity
    disaster-management framework; warnings25
    Cascade
    CLI → INF, WAT, HLT
    Horizon
    annual
  2. ReportedEQL 4RSK-ZAF-WAT-002

    Wastewater and supply system failure

    Driver
    poor maintenance, power loss, flood damage
    Exposure
    rivers and towns downstream of critical systems
    Vulnerability
    47% of systems critical9
    Capacity
    Green and Blue Drop oversight; turnaround evidence not bound
    Cascade
    WAT → HLT, BIO, FOO
    Horizon
    1–5 years
  3. ReportedEQL 4RSK-ZAF-ENE-003

    Electricity supply shortfall

    Driver
    low fleet availability and demand peaks
    Exposure
    water works, clinics, industry, households
    Vulnerability
    availability near 58%5
    Capacity
    load-shedding fell 82% in a year; new capacity528
    Cascade
    ENE → WAT, HLT, FIN
    Horizon
    1–5 years
  4. InferredEQL 3RSK-ZAF-CLI-004

    Multi-year drought and water restriction

    Driver
    successive dry seasons
    Exposure
    metropolitan supply, irrigated farming
    Vulnerability
    high urban losses; dependence on few dams
    Capacity
    demand management proven in Cape Town 201818
    Cascade
    CLI → WAT → FOO, FIN
    Horizon
    1–5 years

4.2Capability ladder

Existence is not readiness. Each of the fifteen capability functions is placed on the ladder by the strongest public evidence at baseline.

Table 4.1Capabilities on the ladder of evidence: listed, exists, demonstrated, tested
FunctionRungLevelStrongest public evidence at baseline
Prevention and mitigationNOT BOUNDsource: building and land-use records · blocker: not reviewed by evidence close
Monitoring and observationEXISTSnational wastewater, drinking-water and water-loss assessments are published89
Early warningNOT BOUNDsource: South African Weather Service and National Disaster Management Centre records · blocker: not retrieved
Preparedness and planningLISTEDthe Disaster Management Act sets the planning framework; its use is not bound25
Redundancy and reservesNOT BOUNDsource: fuel, water and grain reserve data · blocker: not retrieved
ResponseNOT BOUNDsource: disaster-response after-action records · blocker: not retrieved
Continuity of critical servicesEXISTSload-shedding energy fell 82% in a year, but water-works power continuity is not bound5
RecoveryNOT BOUNDsource: reconstruction records after the 2022 and 2025 floods · blocker: not retrieved
AdaptationLISTEDthe Climate Change Act provides for adaptation planning; delivery is not bound21
Social protectionNOT BOUNDsource: social-grant and unemployment-insurance records · blocker: not reviewed
Finance and insuranceNOT BOUNDsource: Prudential Authority and SARB statistics29 · blocker: not retrieved
Institutional coordinationLISTEDthe Disaster Management Act sets national and provincial centres; function is not bound25
Technical infrastructureLISTEDwastewater condition documented as critical in 47% of systems9
WorkforceNOT BOUNDsource: municipal engineering and operator registers · blocker: not retrieved
Research capacityADEQUATEa national inventory and a national biodiversity assessment are published213
A capability listed in policy is not a tested one; each rung is the strongest public evidence at baseline.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 25Government of South Africa (ed.), Disaster Management Act, Act 57 of 2002. Pretoria, 2002.back
  2. 9Parliamentary Monitoring Group (ed.), “Green, Blue and No Drop Reports 2025: Ministry briefing,” Portfolio Committee on Water and Sanitation, 9 June 2026. PMG, Cape Town, 2026.back
  3. 5Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ed.), “Loadshedding down 82% in H1 2025 as demand eases and EAF edges up, but tariffs still exceed inflation.” CSIR, Pretoria, 2025.back
  4. 28Department of Electricity and Energy (ed.), Integrated Resource Plan 2025. Pretoria, 2025.back
  5. 18H. Muller, “Cape Town’s drought: don’t blame climate change,” Nature, vol. 559, pp. 174–176, 2018.back
  6. 8Department of Water and Sanitation (ed.), Green Drop, Blue Drop and No Drop reports 2025, released 31 March 2026. DWS, Pretoria, 2026.back
  7. 21Government of South Africa (ed.), Climate Change Act, Act 22 of 2024. Pretoria, 2024.back
  8. 29South African Reserve Bank (ed.), Financial Stability Review. SARB, Pretoria, 2026.back
  9. 2Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (ed.), GHG Inventory for South Africa: 2000–2022, 9th National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report. DFFE, Pretoria, 2025.back
  10. 13South African National Biodiversity Institute (ed.), National Biodiversity Assessment 2025: summary of findings and key messages. SANBI, Pretoria, launched 9 December 2025.back

Power shortfall and wastewater stress in a dense province

A conditional statement under stated assumptions, never a prediction.

2 min read0 figures0 tables5 notesNR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE

5.1Assumptions

Scenario SCN-ZAF-PWR-01: what is assumed, and what is held constant.

Baseline
the 2026 reference state in this edition
Drivers
a winter or summer supply shortfall of several weeks in a dense province, followed by heavy rain
Analogues
load-shedding of 2024 and 20255; KwaZulu-Natal 202214; Eastern Cape 202515
Interventions
none modelled; the specification describes the unmitigated case
Run state
narrative specification; quantified Foundry run scheduled for Q1 2027

5.2The cascade, step by step

  1. 1

    ENE → WAT

    pumping and treatment lose power where backup is thin

    grid evidence5

  2. 2

    WAT → HLT

    untreated discharge and supply gaps raise exposure to waterborne disease

    Green Drop evidence9

  3. 3

    CLI → INF

    heavy rain damages roads and treatment works

    KwaZulu-Natal 202214

  4. 4

    INF → FOO

    flooded roads delay food and fuel distribution

    Eastern Cape 202515

  5. 5

    ENE → FIN

    repair and tariff costs fall on municipal and household budgets

    tariff path5

  6. 6

    WAT → HLT

    clinics that treat chronic disease lose water and power

    HIV population1

5.3The scenario as a table of steps

How the shock in scenario SCN-ZAF-PWR-01 would travel through South Africa’s coupled systems, step by step, under the assumptions the edition states.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Energy to waterPumping and treatment lose power where backup is thin. Analogue or source: grid evidence [5].Edition ZAF, scenario SCN-ZAF-PWR-01, step 1
02 Water to healthUntreated discharge and supply gaps raise exposure to waterborne disease. Analogue or source: Green Drop evidence [9].Edition ZAF, scenario SCN-ZAF-PWR-01, step 2
03 Climate to infrastructureHeavy rain damages roads and treatment works. Analogue or source: KwaZulu-Natal 2022 [14].Edition ZAF, scenario SCN-ZAF-PWR-01, step 3
04 Infrastructure to foodFlooded roads delay food and fuel distribution. Analogue or source: Eastern Cape 2025 [15].Edition ZAF, scenario SCN-ZAF-PWR-01, step 4
05 Energy to financeRepair and tariff costs fall on municipal and household budgets. Analogue or source: tariff path [5].Edition ZAF, scenario SCN-ZAF-PWR-01, step 5
06 Water to healthClinics that treat chronic disease lose water and power. Analogue or source: HIV population [1].Edition ZAF, scenario SCN-ZAF-PWR-01, step 6

A teaching model of a conditional scenario under the edition’s stated assumptions: not a forecast, not a prediction and not a warning. Sources: South Africa 2026, scenario SCN-ZAF-PWR-01 (2026); South Africa 2026, references (NR-CIT-1) (2026).

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 5Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ed.), “Loadshedding down 82% in H1 2025 as demand eases and EAF edges up, but tariffs still exceed inflation.” CSIR, Pretoria, 2025.back
  2. 14Bloomberg (ed.), “Death toll from flooding in South Africa’s KZN rises to 459.” Bloomberg News, 29 May 2022.back
  3. 15Eastern Cape Provincial Government (ed.), flood recovery update reporting 102 flood-related deaths. Reported by Pondoland Times, Eastern Cape, 2025.back
  4. 9Parliamentary Monitoring Group (ed.), “Green, Blue and No Drop Reports 2025: Ministry briefing,” Portfolio Committee on Water and Sanitation, 9 June 2026. PMG, Cape Town, 2026.back
  5. 1Statistics South Africa (ed.), Mid-year population estimates 2026, Statistical release P0302. Stats SA, Pretoria, July 2026.back

Readings from the other desks

The baseline is read through each steward’s lens, then once as a whole. Each lens is a projection of reviewed findings, not a separate argument. The other desks’ own editions of this subject are listed first, as cross-references, not copies.

11 min read0 figures8 tables35 notesNR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE

6.1The other desks’ editions of this subject

Federation: each desk writes its own edition for the subjects in its remit. Until a desk releases, its edition shows its frame and the reading this edition printed for it.

DeskEditionStateIdentifier
GCRI Systems EvidenceNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
GRF Public DeliberationNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
GRA Capital ReadinessNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
Standards ProgressOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
Academy CapabilityOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
Index MeasurementNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle

6.2Three lenses

One edition, read by each steward. The lens of this site comes first.

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports a coupled reading of South Africa’s risk: the grid is steadier than in 2024, but water services are weaker, and floods have become deadly at provincial scale. Evidence is strongest for emissions, population and wastewater results, and thinnest for ecosystem condition and recovery capability.

CLI-001 · WAT-005 · ENE-003 · SYS-012

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people the risk arrives as a power cut, a water interruption or a flood warning. The baseline asks that public debate weigh how treatment failure and tariffs fall on households and towns.

WAT-006 · ENE-004 · CLI-011

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. Tariffs are up 190% since 2014 and insured flood loss is not bound5. These show where finance-readiness evidence will matter. Nothing here is advice, a rating or an endorsement.

FIN-010 · CLI-011

NEXUS

Synthesis

South Africa publishes strong open assessments of its water systems and its emissions. The 2027 programme should map grid and water dependencies, test the power-and-wastewater pathway at province scale, and bind the missing biodiversity, food-insecurity and loss series.

SYS-012 · A-01 · A-02

6.3Standards, Academy and steward contributions

How the Nexus Standards drafts, the Risk Academy and the three stewards feed each quarterly edition for South Africa. The standards are preparatory working drafts (October 2026) and are cited as drafts, never as adopted standards.

Table 6.1The quarterly rhythm every edition follows
QuarterEditionQuestionBoundary
Q1State and AgendaWhat matters this year, and what is the starting position?observed baseline stays distinct from planned work
Q2Evidence and BuildWhat new evidence and capability have been developed?a configured capability is not a validated result
Q3Stress Test and ReadinessWhat do scenarios and tests reveal?simulated loss or performance is not observed impact
Q4Annual Synthesis and RenewalWhat did the year establish, and what changes next?release follows review, not event publicity deadlines
Table 6.2Who contributes what each quarter
Steward or bodyRoleContribution route
GCRI CanadaLead Institution and Consortium Secretariat; publisher of record; technical truth (key T)science and practice communities · GCRI gateway
The Global Risks Forum (GRF)leadership, dialogue and the Universe programme; public meaning (key M)policy, Universe and national adoption · GRF gateway
The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)finance, insurance and development readiness; capital meaning (key F)finance and insurance · GRA gateway
Nexus Standardspreparatory drafts on vocabulary, hazards, indicators and methodsStandards site · working groups HAZ, IND, MTH, FIN, AI
Risk Academylearning pathways tied to the agenda questionsAcademy gateway · learning by review
South Africanational pathway: Desk, Leadership Council, Consortium, Working Groupsnational Commons room

Standards drafts used in this edition

  • Risk vocabulary NRS-C1 (424 terms) for terms in the glossary
  • Hazard atlas NHS-1 1.1.0 (905 hazards in 120 families) for risk objects
  • Seven risk classes: global, catastrophic, existential, emerging, planetary, exponential, frontier-tech

Standards calendar to watch

  • Founding calls from 20 October 2026; working groups meet from 5 November 2026
  • Inaugural Global Standards Council session, 12 January 2027
  • Quarterly reviews in March, June, September and December, aligned with each edition

6.4GCRI reading: the model card

GCRI’s reading of this edition is its model card: what the national model is, what it computes and where it stops. It is printed in full in Annex A, with the methods it belongs to. Annex A, methodology

6.5Global Risks Forum reading: editorial essays

Four signed essays by the Reports editorial team set out the positions this edition takes. They are interpretation, labelled as such; the evidence they draw on is in the findings register.

The grid has improved, but almost half of wastewater systems are in a critical state. The baseline treats treatment failure as a coupling problem with power, rivers and health, not as a municipal problem alone.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 01

The weak link is wastewater

The 2022 and 2025 floods killed hundreds across two provinces. Every risk object in this edition is read through the lens of how cascading failure follows a flood.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 02

Floods are now a provincial event

A well above-average harvest is good news for supply. It does not say who can afford to eat, which the household survey must show.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 03

Supply is ample, access is not bound

Energy supplies 78% of emissions, and the grid is where reliability and decarbonisation meet. The 2035 range is a ceiling the energy system must meet while keeping the lights on.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 04

Emissions and the grid are one story

6.6Global Risks Alliance reading: q1 2027 readiness pack

The registers that open the first operational quarter. At baseline each is initialised from this edition.

Table 6.3Q1 2027 readiness pack
ItemRegisterState at baselineFirst Q1 2027 entry
E1National risk state deltabaseline set by this editionchanges against the baseline
E2WEFH+B state deltafive system readings setindicator updates and freshness
E3Agenda and Portfolio movementeight agenda items · 7 proposed objectsadmission decisions
E4NWG delivery registerno groups yetfirst monthly outputs
E5NNC capability registermembership opens in Q1 2027first contributions
E6NLC questions and challengesnone yetfirst challenge log
E7Foundry technical stateenvironment preparedfirst sealed cut
E8Publication candidatestwelve findings carried forwardPUBLISH · HOLD dispositions
E9Universe readinessone candidate missionadmission and role spine
E10Correction registernonefirst correction cycle

Publication dispositions

  • Publish
  • Hold
  • Needs evidence
  • Restricted
  • Superseded

6.7Nexus Standards reading: standards and regulatory watch

Instruments that shape the systems in this edition, by status on the retrieval date. The edition assesses no one’s compliance.

  • IN FORCE
  • ADOPTED
  • SUBMITTED
  • UNDER REVIEW
  • PUBLISHED · VOLUNTARY
Table 6.4Standards and regulatory watch
InstrumentBodyScopeStatusRelevance
Paris Agreement42 · second NDC, 2035 range 320 to 380 Mt CO₂e3UNFCCC · South AfricanationalSUBMITTED 2025emissions pathway
Climate Change Act, Act 22 of 202421Government of South AfricanationalENACTED 2024climate governance
Electricity Regulation Amendment Act, Act 38 of 202423Government of South AfricanationalENACTED 2024electricity market
Carbon Tax Act, Act 15 of 201924Government of South AfricanationalIN FORCEcarbon pricing
Disaster Management Act, Act 57 of 200225Government of South AfricanationalIN FORCEdisaster management
National Water Act, Act 36 of 199826Government of South AfricanationalIN FORCEwater resources
Just Energy Transition Investment Plan22The PresidencynationalPUBLISHED 2022transition finance
Kunming-Montreal Framework41CBDinternationalADOPTED 202230by30
Sendai Framework 2015–203040UNDRRinternationalADOPTED 2015disaster risk reduction

Changed since 2024

  • South Africa submitted its second NDC on 24 October 202534
  • The Climate Change Act was enacted in 202421
  • The Electricity Regulation Amendment Act was enacted in 202423

To watch in 2027

  • Implementation of sectoral emission targets under the Climate Change Act21
  • The Integrated Resource Plan and its updates28
  • The Green Drop special watch report on sewer networks; publication not confirmed at evidence close9

6.8Risk Academy reading: literature and evidence review, science and assessments

The review behind this edition covers peer-reviewed science, national and international assessments and the institutional reports that bind its findings. Full systematic reviews begin in Q1 2027 for each agenda item.

Review protocol

Question
What does the published evidence establish about South Africa’s coupled water, energy, food, health and biodiversity risks?
Sources searched
peer-reviewed literature; national and international assessments; official releases; industry loss data
Window
releases available at evidence close, 30 September 2026
Selection
sources that bind or contextualise a finding in this edition
Next step
systematic reviews for agenda items A-01 to A-05 in Q1 2027
Table 6.5Science and assessments
ReferenceTypeYearRoleUsed for
IPCC Synthesis Report39assessment2023contextforcing
IPBES nexus assessment45assessment2024frameworknexus interlinkages
Zscheischler et al.46journal article2018frameworkcompound events
Trisos et al.19assessment chapter2022supportsAfrican impacts
Pinto et al.16attribution study2022supportsKwaZulu-Natal rainfall
State of the Climate in Africa35WMO2025contextregional climate
Table 6.6Institutional reports
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
National inventory 2000–20222DFFE2025supportsemissions
Second NDC3Government of South Africa2025supportstargets
Country Climate and Development Report20World Bank2022contextpathways
Global Assessment Report37UNDRR2025contextdisaster risk
Africa Energy Outlook36IEA2022contextenergy access
Table 6.7Official statistics and national sources
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Mid-year population estimates1Stats SA2026supportsprofile and health
Crop monitoring7FAO GIEWS2026supportsfood
Electricity statistics5CSIR2025supportsgrid
Green, Blue and No Drop89DWS2026supportswater
Country profile6Ember2025supportspower mix
World Health Statistics47WHO2025contextpeer health data
Table 6.8Industry, loss data and international sources
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Article IV consultation11IMF2026contextmacro
NatCatSERVICE44Munich Re2026contextglobal losses
Financial Stability Review29SARB2026listedfinance
Budget Review30National Treasury2026listedpublic finance
Integrated Resource Plan28Department of Electricity and Energy2025listedpower plan

Where the evidence agrees

  • Extreme rainfall events in southern Africa are in the scientific record1619
  • The energy sector dominates national emissions2
  • Cape Town’s 2018 water crisis was averted by demand reduction18

Where it is unsettled

  • How much of the grid’s improvement in 2025 is demand-side rather than supply-side5
  • How fast wastewater systems can be restored to compliance9
  • How much of food insecurity is a matter of access rather than supply738

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 5Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ed.), “Loadshedding down 82% in H1 2025 as demand eases and EAF edges up, but tariffs still exceed inflation.” CSIR, Pretoria, 2025.back
  2. 42UNFCCC (ed.), Paris Agreement. United Nations, Paris, 2015.back
  3. 3Government of South Africa (ed.), Second Nationally Determined Contribution. Submission to the UNFCCC, 24 October 2025.back
  4. 21Government of South Africa (ed.), Climate Change Act, Act 22 of 2024. Pretoria, 2024.back
  5. 23Government of South Africa (ed.), Electricity Regulation Amendment Act, Act 38 of 2024. Pretoria, 2024.back
  6. 24Government of South Africa (ed.), Carbon Tax Act, Act 15 of 2019. Pretoria, 2019.back
  7. 25Government of South Africa (ed.), Disaster Management Act, Act 57 of 2002. Pretoria, 2002.back
  8. 26Government of South Africa (ed.), National Water Act, Act 36 of 1998. Pretoria, 1998.back
  9. 22The Presidency of South Africa (ed.), South Africa’s Just Energy Transition Investment Plan (JET IP) 2023–2027. Pretoria, 2022.back
  10. 41Convention on Biological Diversity (ed.), Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, Decision 15/4. CBD Secretariat, Montreal, 2022.back
  11. 40UNDRR (ed.), Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. UNDRR, Geneva, 2015.back
  12. 4Climate Action Tracker (ed.), “South Africa: 2035 NDC.” Climate Analytics and NewClimate Institute, December 2025.back
  13. 28Department of Electricity and Energy (ed.), Integrated Resource Plan 2025. Pretoria, 2025.back
  14. 9Parliamentary Monitoring Group (ed.), “Green, Blue and No Drop Reports 2025: Ministry briefing,” Portfolio Committee on Water and Sanitation, 9 June 2026. PMG, Cape Town, 2026.back
  15. 39H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.), Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. IPCC, Geneva, 2023.back
  16. 45P. D. McElwee, P. A. Harrison, T. L. van Huysen et al. (eds.), Thematic Assessment Report on the Interlinkages among Biodiversity, Water, Food and Health. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054back
  17. 46J. Zscheischler, S. Westra, B. J. J. M. van den Hurk et al., “Future climate risk from compound events,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 8, pp. 469–477, 2018.back
  18. 19C. H. Trisos, I. O. Adelekan, E. Totin et al., “Africa,” in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, 2022.back
  19. 16I. Pinto et al., Rapid attribution study of the April 2022 heavy rainfall in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. World Weather Attribution, 2022.back
  20. 35World Meteorological Organization (ed.), State of the Climate in Africa 2024. WMO, Geneva, 2025.back
  21. 2Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (ed.), GHG Inventory for South Africa: 2000–2022, 9th National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report. DFFE, Pretoria, 2025.back
  22. 20World Bank (ed.), South Africa Country Climate and Development Report. World Bank Group, Washington DC, 2022.back
  23. 37UNDRR (ed.), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025. UNDRR, Geneva, 2025.back
  24. 36International Energy Agency (ed.), Africa Energy Outlook 2022. IEA, Paris, 2022.back
  25. 1Statistics South Africa (ed.), Mid-year population estimates 2026, Statistical release P0302. Stats SA, Pretoria, July 2026.back
  26. 7Food and Agriculture Organization (ed.), GIEWS Country Brief: South Africa, reference date 22 April 2026. FAO, Rome, 2026.back
  27. 8Department of Water and Sanitation (ed.), Green Drop, Blue Drop and No Drop reports 2025, released 31 March 2026. DWS, Pretoria, 2026.back
  28. 6Ember (ed.), “South Africa: electricity country profile, 2025.” Ember, London, retrieved 2026-11-03.back
  29. 47World Health Organization (ed.), World Health Statistics 2025. WHO, Geneva, 2025.back
  30. 11International Monetary Fund (ed.), South Africa: 2025 Article IV Consultation, Country Report. IMF, Washington DC, February 2026.back
  31. 44Munich Re (ed.), Natural disasters in 2025: NatCatSERVICE full-year figures. Munich Re, Munich, January 2026.back
  32. 29South African Reserve Bank (ed.), Financial Stability Review. SARB, Pretoria, 2026.back
  33. 30National Treasury (ed.), Budget Review 2026. National Treasury, Pretoria, 2026.back
  34. 18H. Muller, “Cape Town’s drought: don’t blame climate change,” Nature, vol. 559, pp. 174–176, 2018.back
  35. 38Statistics South Africa (ed.), General Household Survey 2023, Statistical release P0318. Stats SA, Pretoria, 2024.back

The 2027 agenda

Eight bounded questions open the 2027 National Agenda. Each comes from a baseline finding, names the initiative that will carry it and the first output due at the Q1 2027 cut.

5 min read0 figures6 tables4 notesNR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE

7.1Questions for the operational series

  1. A-01

    How would a power shortfall interrupt pumping and treatment in a dense province, and how long would services take to recover?

    INI-ZAF-ENE-01 · grid and water continuity; first output: dependency graph for two provinces.

  2. A-02

    Where are wastewater systems in a critical state, and which rivers and settlements sit downstream?

    INI-ZAF-WAT-02 · wastewater and river risk; first output: system-by-system register.

  3. A-03

    How much of urban supply is lost, and what does it cost in energy?

    INI-ZAF-WAT-03 · non-revenue water; first output: loss-and-energy table for five metros.

  4. A-04

    How exposed are food and fertiliser supply to concurrent drought, price and logistics shocks?

    INI-ZAF-FOO-04 · food supply exposure; first output: commodity dependence table.

  5. A-05

    Where do flood losses fall on households, municipalities and the national budget?

    INI-ZAF-FIN-05 · flood protection gap; first output: peril-by-province loss table.

  6. A-06

    How do river basins and dams perform under multi-year drought?

    INI-ZAF-WAT-01 · workstream; first output: basin performance note.

  7. A-07

    What is the condition of ecosystems that supply water, and how is it changing?

    To be admitted in Q1 2027; first output: scoping note against the 2025 assessment.

  8. A-08

    Which capabilities have been tested in real disasters, and which are only planned?

    National capability register; first output: rung evidence for 15 functions.

7.2Portfolio proposed for the Q1 2027 alignment

Five initiatives and one Universe mission candidate are proposed for admission at the Q1 2027 alignment. They are programme objects, no partner, funder or member is attached to them in this edition.

Table 7.1Objects proposed for the first operational quarter
IDObjectKindQuestionState
INI-ZAF-ENE-01Grid and water continuityInitiativeA-01PROPOSED
INI-ZAF-WAT-02Wastewater and river riskInitiativeA-02PROPOSED
INI-ZAF-WAT-03Non-revenue water and energyInitiativeA-03PROPOSED
INI-ZAF-FOO-04Food supply exposureInitiativeA-04PROPOSED
INI-ZAF-FIN-05Flood protection gapInitiativeA-05PROPOSED
PRJ-ZAF-ENE-01aTwo-province grid and water dependency graphProjectA-01PROPOSED
MSN-ZAF-2027-01Power, wastewater and flood Universe missionMissionA-01Candidate

7.3The pathway

South Africa is the national pathway through which the Nexus operating system will run in South Africa from 2027. At baseline the pathway is designed and its records are prepared; its councils and working groups are constituted from Q1 2027. This page states what exists today and what comes next, nothing more.

  1. 01

    One National Agenda

    bounded national questions for the year

    DRAFT 2027 · agenda review at the Q1 alignment

  2. 02

    National Desk

    coordination, records, routing and continuity

    DESIGNED · constituted in Q1 2027

  3. 03

    National Model

    the country as a system of systems

    v0 SPECIFIED · v1 with the first Foundry cut

  4. 04

    National Portfolio

    risks, capabilities, initiatives, projects, missions

    7 PROPOSED · admission at the Q1 alignment

  5. 05

    Foundry

    continuous computational environment

    PREPARED · first sealed cut NQ-ZAF-2027-Q1

  6. 06

    Reports

    quarterly and annual publication

    BASELINE ISSUED · Q1 2027 · State & Agenda

  7. 07

    Universe

    annual proving environment

    CANDIDATE MISSION · mandate set in 2027

  8. 08

    Evidence and correction

    after-action, correction and renewal

    OPEN · first correction cycle in Q2 2027

7.4Universe 2027, evidence pack for the candidate mission

  1. 01

    Mandate

  2. 02

    Core Build · 1 month

  3. 03

    Action · 1 week

  4. 04

    Evidence seal

  5. 05

    Portfolio correction

  6. 06

    Next mandate

Table 7.2Universe 2027, evidence pack for the candidate mission
ItemRecordStateTiming
F1Annual mandate recordPLANNEDafter the Q2 2027 alignment
F2Core Build recordPLANNEDone month before the exercise
F3Exercise evidencePLANNEDduring the Action week
F4Decision packetsPLANNEDexercise state only
F5Proof receiptsPLANNEDscoped to each recorded check
F6After-action reportPLANNEDwithin one quarter
F7Upgrade docketPLANNEDrouted to the Portfolio
F8Portfolio renewalPLANNEDQ4 2027 annual edition
F9Public synthesisPLANNEDpublic-safe extracts only

Mission

ID
MSN-ZAF-2027-01 · Power, wastewater and flood Universe mission
Role spine
Leadership sponsor (NLC) · Institutional anchor (NNC) · Mission lead (NWG)
Receiving actors
to be identified with the mandate

7.5Handoffs and routing

Where the baseline’s findings go next. A handoff routes a finding for awareness, review or work; it transfers no authority.

Table 7.3Handoffs and routing
FindingRouted toPurposeClass
CLI-001 · emissionspublic recordreference for the 2027 seriesPUBLIC
ENE-003 · load-sheddingINI-ZAF-ENE-01grid and water continuityPUBLIC
WAT-005 · Green DropINI-ZAF-WAT-02wastewater and river riskPUBLIC
WAT-006 · water lossINI-ZAF-WAT-03loss and energyPUBLIC
FOO-007 · foodINI-ZAF-FOO-04food supply exposurePUBLIC
CLI-011 · floodsINI-ZAF-FIN-05 · key F reviewflood protection gapPUBLIC
HLT-008 · healthresearch question A-01service continuityPUBLIC
SYS-012 · compound pathwayMSN-ZAF-2027-01Universe candidateCONSORTIUM
Table 7.4Routing rules by publication class
ClassWhere it goesWho can see it
PUBLICthe published edition and its evidence bundleanyone
CONSORTIUMgoverned rooms of the national pathwayconsortium members under agreement
CONTROLLEDneed-to-know channelsnamed competent actors only

7.6Feeds and signal register

Table 7.5Feeds watched from Q1 2027
FeedProducerLatencyFeeds into
Weather warnings and rainfallSouth African Weather Servicereal timeCLI findings
Grid status and load-sheddingEskomdailyENE findings
Dam levelsDepartment of Water and SanitationweeklyRSK-ZAF-CLI-004
Green, Blue and No Drop reportsDepartment of Water and SanitationperiodicWAT-005
Crop estimatesCrop Estimates Committeemonthly in seasonFOO-007
Crop monitoring briefFAO GIEWSperiodicFOO-007
Population and labour statisticsStatistics South Africaper releaseprofile

Escalation routes

  • none · keep monitoring
  • research question
  • project
  • risk object
  • quarterly publication
  • signal report
Table 7.6Signals at baseline
IDSignalCorroborationSystemsRoute
SIG-ZAF-001Load-shedding energy down 82% in a year5CORROBORATEDENE · FINrisk object RSK-ZAF-ENE-003
SIG-ZAF-002Critical wastewater systems up to 47%9CORROBORATEDWAT · HLTinitiative A-02
SIG-ZAF-003Provincial flood tolls in 2022 and 20251415CORROBORATEDCLI · INFresearch question A-01

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 5Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ed.), “Loadshedding down 82% in H1 2025 as demand eases and EAF edges up, but tariffs still exceed inflation.” CSIR, Pretoria, 2025.back
  2. 9Parliamentary Monitoring Group (ed.), “Green, Blue and No Drop Reports 2025: Ministry briefing,” Portfolio Committee on Water and Sanitation, 9 June 2026. PMG, Cape Town, 2026.back
  3. 14Bloomberg (ed.), “Death toll from flooding in South Africa’s KZN rises to 459.” Bloomberg News, 29 May 2022.back
  4. 15Eastern Cape Provincial Government (ed.), flood recovery update reporting 102 flood-related deaths. Reported by Pondoland Times, Eastern Cape, 2025.back

Systems in depth

One section per system: its state at evidence close, its exposures and what the operational series will watch.

5 min read0 figures5 tables13 notesNR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE

8.1Water, the baseline system chapter

Water services are the weaker link. Many wastewater systems are in a critical state, and almost half of the water put into supply is lost before it is billed.

47%

wastewater systems critical, 20259

431billion litres

lost a year in Gauteng9

Table 8.1State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Wastewater47% of 848 systems critical; 8% excellent or good89Reported
Drinking watergenerally stable; 8% of systems in critical risk9Reported
Water lossnational non-revenue water 47.3%910Reported
Renewable supplyrenewable water per person not boundFAO AQUASTAT33NOT BOUND

Couplings into other systems

  • ENE → WAT pumping and treatment
  • WAT → HLT drinking water and sanitation
  • CLI → WAT drought and flood
  • WAT → BIO effluent in rivers

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • per-system and per-municipality scores
  • renewable water per person

8.2Energy, the baseline system chapter

Load-shedding has fallen sharply, but fleet availability is near 58% and fossil fuels supplied 83% of electricity in 2025.

749GWh

shed in the first half of 20255

58%

fleet energy availability5

83%

fossil share of electricity, 20256

Table 8.2State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Load-sheddingenergy shed down 82% year on year5Reported
Availabilityfleet energy availability factor 58%5Reported
Tariffsup 190% since 2014; 8.76% rise for 20265Reported
2025 generation by sourcefull-year shares not boundEskom report27NOT BOUND

Couplings into other systems

  • ENE → WAT pumping and treatment
  • ENE → HLT clinics and cold chains
  • CLI → ENE demand peaks
  • ENE → FIN tariffs and municipal budgets

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • 2025 generation by source
  • 2023–2024 emissions inventory

8.3Food and agrifood, the baseline system chapter

Food supply is currently ample: the 2025 maize harvest was well above average and the 2026 forecast is 17.1 million tonnes.

17.1million t

maize forecast, 20267

19.5million t

cereals forecast, 20267

2million t

maize exports forecast, 2025/267

Table 8.3State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Maize2026 forecast 17.1 million tonnes7Reported
Cerealsabout 19.5 million tonnes forecast7Reported
Priceswholesale maize about 30% to 40% lower year on year in March 20267Reported
Household food insecurityprevalence not boundStats SA household survey38NOT BOUND

Couplings into other systems

  • CLI → FOO drought and heat
  • ENE → FOO fuel and fertiliser
  • INF → FOO roads and logistics
  • WAT → FOO irrigation

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • household food insecurity
  • import dependence by commodity

8.4Health and One Health, the baseline system chapter

About 7.8 million people were living with HIV in 2026, which makes continuity of care a lifeline question in every outage and flood.

7.8million

people living with HIV, 20261

65.5 · 71.0years

life expectancy, men · women1

10.7%

aged 60 or over1

Table 8.4State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
HIVabout 7.8 million people; 12.3% prevalence in the population1Reported
Life expectancy65.5 years for men and 71.0 for women1Reported
Ageing10.7% aged 60 or over1Reported
Water-related illnessnational series not boundMinistry of Health recordsNOT BOUND

Couplings into other systems

  • WAT → HLT water and sanitation
  • ENE → HLT clinics and cold chains
  • CLI → HLT floods and heat
  • INF → HLT access to care

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • water-related illness series
  • clinic continuity in outages

8.5Biodiversity and ecosystems, the baseline system chapter

The National Biodiversity Assessment 2025 was launched on 9 December 2025. Its headline figures are not bound in this edition.

9 Dec2025

assessment launched13

Not bound

ecosystem threat status13

30%

global target by 203041

Table 8.5State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Assessmentfourth edition launched 9 December 202513Reported
Threat statusshare of ecosystem types threatened not boundSANBI13NOT BOUND
Protectionshare of land and sea protected not boundSANBI13NOT BOUND
Conditionnot bound outside protected areasSANBI13NOT BOUND

Couplings into other systems

  • BIO → WAT watershed regulation
  • BIO → FOO pollination and soils
  • WAT → BIO effluent in rivers
  • CLI → BIO drought and fire

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • ecosystem threat status
  • protected-area coverage
  • condition outside protected areas

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 9Parliamentary Monitoring Group (ed.), “Green, Blue and No Drop Reports 2025: Ministry briefing,” Portfolio Committee on Water and Sanitation, 9 June 2026. PMG, Cape Town, 2026.back
  2. 8Department of Water and Sanitation (ed.), Green Drop, Blue Drop and No Drop reports 2025, released 31 March 2026. DWS, Pretoria, 2026.back
  3. 10Department of Water and Sanitation (ed.), Blue Drop, Green Drop and No Drop reports 2023, released 5 December 2023. DWS, Pretoria, 2023.back
  4. 33Food and Agriculture Organization (ed.), AQUASTAT: South Africa country profile and water resources data. FAO, Rome.back
  5. 5Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ed.), “Loadshedding down 82% in H1 2025 as demand eases and EAF edges up, but tariffs still exceed inflation.” CSIR, Pretoria, 2025.back
  6. 6Ember (ed.), “South Africa: electricity country profile, 2025.” Ember, London, retrieved 2026-11-03.back
  7. 27Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd (ed.), Integrated Report 2025. Eskom, Johannesburg, 2025.back
  8. 28Department of Electricity and Energy (ed.), Integrated Resource Plan 2025. Pretoria, 2025.back
  9. 7Food and Agriculture Organization (ed.), GIEWS Country Brief: South Africa, reference date 22 April 2026. FAO, Rome, 2026.back
  10. 38Statistics South Africa (ed.), General Household Survey 2023, Statistical release P0318. Stats SA, Pretoria, 2024.back
  11. 1Statistics South Africa (ed.), Mid-year population estimates 2026, Statistical release P0302. Stats SA, Pretoria, July 2026.back
  12. 13South African National Biodiversity Institute (ed.), National Biodiversity Assessment 2025: summary of findings and key messages. SANBI, Pretoria, launched 9 December 2025.back
  13. 41Convention on Biological Diversity (ed.), Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, Decision 15/4. CBD Secretariat, Montreal, 2022.back

Methodology

How the edition was made: methods, the model card, the evidence cut and its age, the acceptance record and the glossary.

9 min read0 figures12 tables6 notesNR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE

A.1Methods

The baseline uses published values and four simple derivations. Each is shown in full so that any reader can reproduce it.

Table A.1Methods
No.DerivationCalculationResult
(1)Emissions excluding land use, 2022374.1 + 30.6 + 52.9 + 20.7≈ 478.3 Mt
(2)Emissions including land use, 2022478.3 − 43.2≈ 435.1 Mt
(3)Change excl. land use since 2000478.3 vs 489.2 (2000 sum of sectors)≈ −2.2%
(4)Cut to the 2035 range, excl. land use1 − 397 ÷ 478.3 and 1 − 337 ÷ 478.3≈ 17% to 29%
Table A.2Coupling strength scale (matrix and model card)
StrengthDefinition
STRONGa disruption in the source system has historically changed the target system’s service or output within one season
MODERATEan effect is documented but buffered or slower
WEAKan effect is plausible but not documented at national scale
Table A.3Status grammar
LabelRule
Reportedvalue as issued by its source, with year
Inferredreasoned from cited evidence; never a measurement
EstimatedNexus analytical value with stated method
Scenarioconditional on stated assumptions
Expert inputstructured editorial judgement awaiting evidence

A.2Model card, National Model v0

Model ID
MDL-ZAF-NATIONAL · v0.1
Purpose
represent South Africa as coupled water, energy, food, health and biodiversity systems with forcing and transmission layers
Family
graph-based system of systems
Inputs
the cited sources of this edition; no proprietary data
Method
expert-specified coupling strengths (STRONG · MODERATE · WEAK) from evidence and analogue events
Validation
none yet, first validation against Q1 2027 Foundry evidence
Uncertainty
qualitative; strengths are hypotheses, not measurements
Domain of validity
national scale; not for province or asset-level use
Reproducibility
strength table and sources published in this edition
20couplings

typed in v0

9strong

documented within one season

7moderate

documented, buffered

4weak

plausible, undocumented

A.3The baseline evidence cut

Every Nexus edition is published from a frozen evidence cut. The baseline cut is documentary: it pins the exact edition of every source cited. Model runs begin with the first Foundry cut in Q1 2027.

Cut ID
NQ-ZAF-2026-Q0-1
Type
baseline documentary cut
Resolution policy
pinned · as of 30 September 2026
Sources pinned
49 cited sources, each at the edition and retrieval date in the references
Model runs
none at baseline, analytical values are stated with their method
Digest
computed at freeze and recorded in the publication record
Supersedes
nothing, first cut of the series
Superseded by
NQ-ZAF-2027-Q1-1 at the Q1 2027 close

Lineage

  1. 01

    source edition

  2. 02

    pinned citation

  3. 03

    finding

  4. 04

    page

  5. 05

    publication record

Table A.4From the baseline cut to the first Foundry cut
ElementBaseline 2026Q1 2027
Sourcescited publications, pinned by editionqualified source bindings with versions
Analysisstated methods and editorial estimatestyped analysis specifications
ModelsNational Model v0 specificationmodel runs with receipts
Findingstwelve baseline findingsfindings re-bound to the cut
Reviewfive passes scheduledfive passes on the exact digest

A.4Evidence age and coverage

A 2026 edition rests on evidence observed in many different years. This page shows each time base, so that no single year label hides older evidence.

Table A.5Evidence age and coverage
IndicatorObservedReleasedCadenceNext release
Population and HIV2026Jul 2026annualJul 2027
GHG inventory2022Feb 2025periodicnext inventory, draft 1990–2024 not read
2035 climate range2025Oct 2025periodicnext NDC cycle
Load-shedding energyH1 2025Sep 2025half-yearlylater halves not bound
Green Drop results2025Mar 2026periodicspecial watch report
Non-revenue water2025Mar 2026periodic2027
Maize forecast2026Apr 2026periodiccrop estimates
Biodiversity assessment2025Dec 2025periodicfigures to be bound
Flood deaths2025Jul 2025per eventper event
Table A.6Coverage by system at baseline
SystemCoverageThinnest dimension
Climate forcingPARTIALrainfall extremes by province
EnergyPARTIAL2025 generation by source
FoodPARTIALhousehold food insecurity
HealthPARTIALwater-related illness
WaterPARTIALper-system results; renewable supply
BiodiversityTHINthreat status and condition
FinanceTHINinsured share of loss
DigitalTHINdependency mapping

A.5Evidence cards, two anchor sources

Issued by the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment under the UNFCCC. Periodic, calendar-year basis. Role: binds CLI-001 and the sector figures.

EVD-ZAF-001

National inventory 2000–20222

Issued by the Department of Water and Sanitation; read through the record of the ministry briefing to the committee. Periodic; released 31 March 2026. Role: binds WAT-005 and WAT-006, labelled as reported.

EVD-ZAF-002

Green Drop results89

Table A.7Quality dimensions at baseline
DimensionEVD-ZAF-001EVD-ZAF-002
Completenessall sectors and gasesall assessed systems
Timelinessabout 37 months after the inventory yearabout 3 months before the briefing
Revisionback-revised with each inventoryrevised with each assessment
Method transparencypublished methodologyrisk scores; method not read in full
External validationUNFCCC review processnot stated in the record read

Evidence cards to follow in Q1 2027

  • DWS Green Drop report8, read in full for per-system scores
  • DFFE draft inventory 1990–20242, when final
  • CSIR and Eskom statistics527, second half of 2025
  • SANBI assessment13, headline figures

A.6Publication acceptance record

Editorial self-check at evidence close. Every applicable item carries a disposition; the remaining items are review, approval and deposit.

Table A.8Publication acceptance record
GroupAreaItemsPassN/APending
D1Identity and scope8800
D2Source and data12912
D3Analysis and models12381
D4Findings and claims9801
D5Figures, tables, maps10622
D6Editorial and citations10802
D7Review and approval130013
D8Artefact and design12705
D9Registry and release9009

Publication gate

Conditions met
14 of 23 at evidence close
Blocking problems
none recorded
Open conditions
reviews, approval of the exact digest, deposit, registry pointer

Not applicable at baseline

Model runs
first runs in Q1 2027
Maps
plates in Q2 2027
Waivers
none

A.7Status words

Table A.9The status every value carries
StatusWhat it means
ObservedMeasured directly and published by the source.
ReportedPublished statistics of an official or institutional source.
DeclaredStated by the body concerned; not independently measured.
EstimatedA Nexus estimate from cited evidence, with its method in Annex A.
ModelledProduced by a stated model from cited inputs.
InferredReasoned from cited evidence; not measured.
ForecastA projection by the cited source.
SimulatedA simulation result under stated assumptions.
ScenarioA conditional statement under stated assumptions; never a prediction.
Expert inputExpert judgement, recorded with its basis.
CandidateProposed for a later edition; not yet evidence.
Evidence-quality levels (EQL 1 to 5) grade the source behind a value; they are not a score of the subject.

A.8How the edition is made, released and corrected

Every edition is built from a sealed evidence cut, reviewed under three keys, signed and deposited before any site shows it as published; corrections go to Nexus Standards as change proposals and feed the next cut.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Evidence arrives from the pillarsFoundry seals observations and indicator series, Universe hands over after-action and scenario findings, and contributions are screened at every gateway, including this site’s.
02 The cut is sealedOn the cut date the evidence is pinned under one identifier, so anyone can rebuild the edition from exactly what it was built on.
03 The edition is assembledThe edition is drafted from its template and content pack. Agents may draft; they never publish and never decide.
04 The keys turnAt the publisher of record the truth key comes first: every value is checked against its source or stated method before the meaning and capital keys turn. No edition moves on until every key has been turned by a named steward.
05 The gate opensA named approver releases one exact digest of the edition; any change after this point is a new version, never a silent edit.
06 Signed and depositedThe PDF, the web edition and the data bundle are signed together with a manifest and an RO-Crate description, and deposited on Zenodo with a concept and a version DOI.
07 Published on its desk’s siteOnly then does the edition show as published on its desk’s Reports site, and the Collection lists it as a part.
08 Corrections go to StandardsMethod and correction findings go to Nexus Standards as change proposals; citations, corrections and new contributions feed the next evidence cut.

A teaching model of the process, not a forecast and not a record of any run; dates and counts on this page come from the programme record. Sources: Reports governance at GCRI Canada (2026); Zenodo, repository of record for Reports deposits (2026).

Lifecycle, one state at a time: Draft, Computed, Evidence bound, Reviewed, Approved for release, Published, Corrected, Superseded. This edition is a draft.

A.9Glossary and abbreviations

Table A.10Series terms
TermMeaning
Baseline Editionthe inaugural annual edition that fixes the reference state for the series
WEFH+Bwater, energy, food, health and biodiversity, the national nexus core
Couplinga typed dependency through which one system transmits to another
Protection gapthe share of losses not covered by insurance
Capability ladderLISTED → EXISTS → ADEQUATE → TESTED → DEMONSTRATED
EQLevidence-quality level, 1–5
Evidence cuta frozen resolution of exact sources and versions
NNC · NLC · NWGNational Nexus Consortium · National Leadership Council · National Working Groups
Table A.11Abbreviations used in this edition
AbbreviationExpansion
CSIRCouncil for Scientific and Industrial Research
DFFEDepartment of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment
DWSDepartment of Water and Sanitation
EAFenergy availability factor
FAOFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
GIEWSGlobal Information and Early Warning System
IMFInternational Monetary Fund
LULUCFland use, land-use change and forestry
NBANational Biodiversity Assessment
NDCnationally determined contribution
PMGParliamentary Monitoring Group
SANBISouth African National Biodiversity Institute
SARBSouth African Reserve Bank
Stats SAStatistics South Africa

A.10Technical annex

Table A.12Technical annex
ItemAnnexContentsStatus
A.1Indicator definitionsthe baseline indicator set, with units and sourcesIN THIS EDITION
A.2Coupling strengthsthe twenty-cell matrix and its rationaleIN THIS EDITION
A.3Scenario specificationSCN-ZAF-PWR-01 assumptions and signpostsIN THIS EDITION
A.4Capability placementsrung evidence for fifteen functionsIN THIS EDITION
A.5Model diagnosticsfirst runs and validationQ1 2027
A.6Sensitivity analysesinfluence of coupling strengthsQ2 2027
A.7Provincial notesatlas cards for every provinceQ2 2027
A.8Review statementspass-by-pass review recordAT RELEASE

A.1 · indicator definition, wastewater system in a critical state

Construct
a treatment system whose Green Drop score falls below 31%
Unit
share of assessed systems
Scope
municipal wastewater treatment systems assessed in the national round
Source
DWS Green Drop results89
Revision
reassessed in each national round
Known limits
scoring rules were read in a secondary record, not the report itself

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 2Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (ed.), GHG Inventory for South Africa: 2000–2022, 9th National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report. DFFE, Pretoria, 2025.back
  2. 8Department of Water and Sanitation (ed.), Green Drop, Blue Drop and No Drop reports 2025, released 31 March 2026. DWS, Pretoria, 2026.back
  3. 9Parliamentary Monitoring Group (ed.), “Green, Blue and No Drop Reports 2025: Ministry briefing,” Portfolio Committee on Water and Sanitation, 9 June 2026. PMG, Cape Town, 2026.back
  4. 5Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ed.), “Loadshedding down 82% in H1 2025 as demand eases and EAF edges up, but tariffs still exceed inflation.” CSIR, Pretoria, 2025.back
  5. 27Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd (ed.), Integrated Report 2025. Eskom, Johannesburg, 2025.back
  6. 13South African National Biodiversity Institute (ed.), National Biodiversity Assessment 2025: summary of findings and key messages. SANBI, Pretoria, launched 9 December 2025.back

Data appendix

The indicator set with its sources, the source registers, the licences of every kind of material and the formats of the edition.

9 min read0 figures7 tables31 notesNR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE

B.1The indicator set

Table B.1Baseline indicator set
IndicatorValueUnitYearStateSource
GHG emissions excl. land use (sum of sectors)478.3Mt CO₂e2022Estimated2
GHG emissions incl. land use (sum of sectors)435.1Mt CO₂e2022Estimated2
Energy sector emissions374.1Mt CO₂e2022Reported2
Land-use sink43.2Mt CO₂e2022Reported2
2035 range incl. land use320 to 380Mt CO₂e2035Reported3
Energy shed by load-shedding749GWhH1 2025Reported5
Fleet energy availability factor58%H1 2025Reported5
Wastewater systems in a critical state47%2025Reported9
Non-revenue water47.3%2025Reported9
Maize harvest forecast17.1million t2026Reported7
Population63.5million2026Reported1
Aged 60 or over10.7%2026Reported1
People living with HIV7.8million2026Reported1
Life expectancy at birth, men65.5years2026Reported1
Life expectancy at birth, women71.0years2026Reported1
Deaths in KwaZulu-Natal floods459deaths2022Reported14
Deaths in Eastern Cape floods102deaths2025Reported15
Renewable water per personNot boundm³n/aNOT BOUND33
Ecosystem threat statusNot bound%n/aNOT BOUND13
Household food insecurityNot bound%n/aNOT BOUND38

B.2National source register

The governed source set behind this edition. Each source keeps its authority, coverage, cadence and role; categories describe origin, not truth.

Domains bound by the register

  • WAT
  • ENE
  • FOO
  • HLT
  • BIO
  • CLI
  • INF
  • FIN
  • TRD
  • MIN
Table B.3National source register
SourceCategoryCoveragePeriodCadenceRole
Mid-year population estimates1national statisticsnational2002–2026annualprofile · HLT
National inventory2national technical authoritynational2000–2022periodicCLI · ENE
Second NDC34government and independent assessmentnational2035periodicCLI
Electricity statistics56research council and think tanknational2025annualENE
Crop monitoring7UN agencynational2026periodicFOO
Green, Blue and No Drop8910ministrynational and provincial2023–2025periodicWAT
IMF country documents1112international bodynational2025–2026annualFIN
Biodiversity assessment13national agencynational2025periodicBIO
Flood tolls1415provincial authorities via pressprovincial2022 · 2025per eventCLI
Attribution and drought studies161718peer-reviewedregional2018–2022per studyCLI
Legal texts2123242526governmentnational1998–2024per amendmentstandards
Cross-checks and capacity statistics31323443UN agencies, IRENA and IEAnational2024–2026annuallisted as fill sources
Series records4849Reports seriesseries2026per editionmethod and peers

B.3Regional reading, South Africa by province

Map plates for every province follow in Q2 2027, when boundary sources and public-safe resolutions are bound. This page gives the regional reading in table form.

Selected populations, 20261

16.3million

Gauteng

12.3million

KwaZulu-Natal

1.4million

Northern Cape

25.7%

share of people in Gauteng

Table B.4Regional reading, South Africa by province
RegionPrincipal hazardsSystems most exposedBaseline evidence
Gautengurban water loss, wastewater stress, grid dependencefinance, industry, water supplynon-revenue water9
KwaZulu-Natalfloods, wastewater stressports, industry, housingfloods 202214
Eastern Capefloods, rural service gapsrural communities, roadsfloods 202515
Western Capedrought and water restrictioncities, irrigated farmingDay Zero crisis 201818
Limpopo and Mpumalangawastewater results improvedpower, mining, farmingGreen Drop 20259
Free State and Northern Capecritical wastewater systemssmall towns, farmingGreen Drop 20259

B.4Atlas card, Eastern Cape

  • province
  • floods
  • rural
  • roads
Systems in view
water, roads, health and homes
Defining events
June 2025 floods, 102 deaths by the provincial count15
Couplings
CLI → INF; CLI → WAT; INF → HLT
Capability evidence
not bound
Gaps
recovery progress; wastewater condition; clinic continuity
Agenda items
A-01 · A-02

The share of Eastern Cape wastewater systems in a critical state rose from 39% to 54% between assessments [9].

WATER

Critical share of systems

Roads and bridges failed in the June 2025 floods, which delayed access to affected communities. Source for extent: not bound; blocker: not retrieved.

ROADS

Cut by floodwater

Clinic access during and after the floods is not bound. Source: provincial health department records. Blocker: not retrieved.

HEALTH

Clinic continuity

B.5South Africa system card

The card through which South Africa appears in the Africa regional edition and the global series. It summarises; it does not rank.

Table B.5South Africa system card
SystemBaseline stateCoupling to watchCoverage
Watermany critical wastewater systemspower loss into water worksPARTIAL
Energyload-shedding down; availability near 58%supply shortfallPARTIAL
Foodample maize supplydrought and logisticsPARTIAL
Healthlarge HIV population on a long-term care pathservice continuity in outagesPARTIAL
Biodiversityassessment 2025 not boundecosystem conditionTHIN

Context

Archetype
upper-middle-income economy with a coal-dominated grid and strained water services
Population
63.5 million (2026)1
Trade
maize exporter and wheat importer; wider trade not bound7
Hazard
floods with provincial death tolls1415

South Africa’s card sits beside its neighbours’; shared basins, grids, corridors and supply chains are read as one regional system.

AFRICA REGIONAL EDITION

One regional system

South African evidence enters the water, energy, food, finance and climate sector reports through the same finding identifiers, so a correction travels everywhere at once.

GLOBAL SECTOR SERIES

Same findings, same IDs

In the global edition South Africa is read against peer distributions and thresholds, never placed in a league table.

GLOBAL FLAGSHIP

Peers, not ranks

B.6Licences

Table B.6Licences of each kind of material
MaterialLicence
TextCC BY 4.0
Dataon the licence of each source; Nexus tables CC BY 4.0
FiguresNexus figures CC BY 4.0; third-party as credited
Mapsboundary source and licence printed on each plate
MetadataCC0 1.0, as Zenodo publishes it
Third-party data, figures and textThe source’s own licence, credited where it is used; never relicensed
Nexus-authored text, tables and figures: CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0). Map plates print their boundary source and licence.

B.7Formats and provenance

Table B.7This edition in every format
FormatKindStateWhat it isIdentifier
Web editionHTMLOn this siteDraft in stewardship review; every value resolves to its source.NR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Print editionPDFAt releaseA4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF, signed with the web edition at release.NR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Indicator dataCSV · JSONOn this site20 indicators with unit, year, status and source; the machine-readable copy ships with the evidence bundle at release.NR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE data release v1
FiguresSVG · PNGOn this site4 on the web edition: headline figure, figure 1.3, coupling instrument, capability ladder.FIG-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-*
SlidesPDFNot recordedNo slide deck is recorded for this edition.
Evidence briefHTML · PDFNot recordedNo evidence brief is recorded for this edition.
Dataset with DOIDataCiteAt releaseConcept and version DOI are minted at deposit; none is recorded yet.

Provenance

Edition pack
The edition’s content pack (JSON), from which the print and web editions are built
Evidence cut
NQ-ZAF-2026-Q0-1, closed 30 September 2026
Reproducibility
sourced values cited; analytical values reproducible from stated parameters
Self-check
14 of 23 at evidence close; a fail on any item blocks release
Review
five passes scheduled before release (in Annex C)
Publisher of record
GCRI for the Nexus Consortium
Corrections
Registry correction pathway; upheld corrections are published as notices with a new version

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 2Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (ed.), GHG Inventory for South Africa: 2000–2022, 9th National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report. DFFE, Pretoria, 2025.back
  2. 3Government of South Africa (ed.), Second Nationally Determined Contribution. Submission to the UNFCCC, 24 October 2025.back
  3. 5Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ed.), “Loadshedding down 82% in H1 2025 as demand eases and EAF edges up, but tariffs still exceed inflation.” CSIR, Pretoria, 2025.back
  4. 9Parliamentary Monitoring Group (ed.), “Green, Blue and No Drop Reports 2025: Ministry briefing,” Portfolio Committee on Water and Sanitation, 9 June 2026. PMG, Cape Town, 2026.back
  5. 7Food and Agriculture Organization (ed.), GIEWS Country Brief: South Africa, reference date 22 April 2026. FAO, Rome, 2026.back
  6. 1Statistics South Africa (ed.), Mid-year population estimates 2026, Statistical release P0302. Stats SA, Pretoria, July 2026.back
  7. 14Bloomberg (ed.), “Death toll from flooding in South Africa’s KZN rises to 459.” Bloomberg News, 29 May 2022.back
  8. 15Eastern Cape Provincial Government (ed.), flood recovery update reporting 102 flood-related deaths. Reported by Pondoland Times, Eastern Cape, 2025.back
  9. 33Food and Agriculture Organization (ed.), AQUASTAT: South Africa country profile and water resources data. FAO, Rome.back
  10. 13South African National Biodiversity Institute (ed.), National Biodiversity Assessment 2025: summary of findings and key messages. SANBI, Pretoria, launched 9 December 2025.back
  11. 38Statistics South Africa (ed.), General Household Survey 2023, Statistical release P0318. Stats SA, Pretoria, 2024.back
  12. 4Climate Action Tracker (ed.), “South Africa: 2035 NDC.” Climate Analytics and NewClimate Institute, December 2025.back
  13. 6Ember (ed.), “South Africa: electricity country profile, 2025.” Ember, London, retrieved 2026-11-03.back
  14. 8Department of Water and Sanitation (ed.), Green Drop, Blue Drop and No Drop reports 2025, released 31 March 2026. DWS, Pretoria, 2026.back
  15. 10Department of Water and Sanitation (ed.), Blue Drop, Green Drop and No Drop reports 2023, released 5 December 2023. DWS, Pretoria, 2023.back
  16. 11International Monetary Fund (ed.), South Africa: 2025 Article IV Consultation, Country Report. IMF, Washington DC, February 2026.back
  17. 12International Monetary Fund (ed.), World Economic Outlook Update, July 2026. IMF, Washington DC, 2026.back
  18. 16I. Pinto et al., Rapid attribution study of the April 2022 heavy rainfall in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. World Weather Attribution, 2022.back
  19. 17F. E. L. Otto, P. Wolski, F. Lehner et al., “Anthropogenic influence on the drivers of the Western Cape drought 2015–2017,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 13, 2018.back
  20. 18H. Muller, “Cape Town’s drought: don’t blame climate change,” Nature, vol. 559, pp. 174–176, 2018.back
  21. 21Government of South Africa (ed.), Climate Change Act, Act 22 of 2024. Pretoria, 2024.back
  22. 23Government of South Africa (ed.), Electricity Regulation Amendment Act, Act 38 of 2024. Pretoria, 2024.back
  23. 24Government of South Africa (ed.), Carbon Tax Act, Act 15 of 2019. Pretoria, 2019.back
  24. 25Government of South Africa (ed.), Disaster Management Act, Act 57 of 2002. Pretoria, 2002.back
  25. 26Government of South Africa (ed.), National Water Act, Act 36 of 1998. Pretoria, 1998.back
  26. 31UNAIDS (ed.), AIDSinfo: South Africa country data. UNAIDS, Geneva, 2026.back
  27. 32International Renewable Energy Agency (ed.), Renewable Capacity Statistics 2026. IRENA, Abu Dhabi, 2026.back
  28. 34United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (ed.), World Population Prospects 2024. UN DESA, New York, 2024.back
  29. 43International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Energy Review 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  30. 48S. Valadbaygi (ed.), Reports: The Foundational Edition, Volumes I and II. Reports series, Edition 2026–2030, V1.0. GCRI for the Nexus Consortium, Toronto, 2026.back
  31. 49S. Valadbaygi (ed.), Global Systems Risk & Resilience Report 2026: Baseline Edition. GCRI for the Nexus Consortium, Toronto, 2026.back

References and record

Every source the edition rests on, the publication record, the corrections log and the open record.

11 min read0 figures1 table0 notesNR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE

C.149 sources

NR-CIT-1, editor first. A DOI is linked where the source has one; Nexus records carry a UNI once the catalogue allocates it (NS-1).

  1. 1Statistics South Africa (ed.), Mid-year population estimates 2026, Statistical release P0302. Stats SA, Pretoria, July 2026. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 5, chapter 6, chapter 8
  2. 2Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (ed.), GHG Inventory for South Africa: 2000–2022, 9th National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report. DFFE, Pretoria, 2025. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6
  3. 3Government of South Africa (ed.), Second Nationally Determined Contribution. Submission to the UNFCCC, 24 October 2025. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6
  4. 4Climate Action Tracker (ed.), “South Africa: 2035 NDC.” Climate Analytics and NewClimate Institute, December 2025. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 6
  5. 5Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ed.), “Loadshedding down 82% in H1 2025 as demand eases and EAF edges up, but tariffs still exceed inflation.” CSIR, Pretoria, 2025. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 5, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  6. 6Ember (ed.), “South Africa: electricity country profile, 2025.” Ember, London, retrieved 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  7. 7Food and Agriculture Organization (ed.), GIEWS Country Brief: South Africa, reference date 22 April 2026. FAO, Rome, 2026. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  8. 8Department of Water and Sanitation (ed.), Green Drop, Blue Drop and No Drop reports 2025, released 31 March 2026. DWS, Pretoria, 2026. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  9. 9Parliamentary Monitoring Group (ed.), “Green, Blue and No Drop Reports 2025: Ministry briefing,” Portfolio Committee on Water and Sanitation, 9 June 2026. PMG, Cape Town, 2026. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 5, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  10. 10Department of Water and Sanitation (ed.), Blue Drop, Green Drop and No Drop reports 2023, released 5 December 2023. DWS, Pretoria, 2023. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 8
  11. 11International Monetary Fund (ed.), South Africa: 2025 Article IV Consultation, Country Report. IMF, Washington DC, February 2026. Cited in chapter 6
  12. 12International Monetary Fund (ed.), World Economic Outlook Update, July 2026. IMF, Washington DC, 2026. Cited in chapter 2
  13. 13South African National Biodiversity Institute (ed.), National Biodiversity Assessment 2025: summary of findings and key messages. SANBI, Pretoria, launched 9 December 2025. Cited in the summary, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 8
  14. 14Bloomberg (ed.), “Death toll from flooding in South Africa’s KZN rises to 459.” Bloomberg News, 29 May 2022. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 5, chapter 7
  15. 15Eastern Cape Provincial Government (ed.), flood recovery update reporting 102 flood-related deaths. Reported by Pondoland Times, Eastern Cape, 2025. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 5, chapter 7
  16. 16I. Pinto et al., Rapid attribution study of the April 2022 heavy rainfall in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. World Weather Attribution, 2022. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 6
  17. 17F. E. L. Otto, P. Wolski, F. Lehner et al., “Anthropogenic influence on the drivers of the Western Cape drought 2015–2017,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 13, 2018. Cited in chapter 1
  18. 18H. Muller, “Cape Town’s drought: don’t blame climate change,” Nature, vol. 559, pp. 174–176, 2018. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 4, chapter 6
  19. 19C. H. Trisos, I. O. Adelekan, E. Totin et al., “Africa,” in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, 2022. Cited in chapter 6
  20. 20World Bank (ed.), South Africa Country Climate and Development Report. World Bank Group, Washington DC, 2022. Cited in chapter 6
  21. 21Government of South Africa (ed.), Climate Change Act, Act 22 of 2024. Pretoria, 2024. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6
  22. 22The Presidency of South Africa (ed.), South Africa’s Just Energy Transition Investment Plan (JET IP) 2023–2027. Pretoria, 2022. Cited in chapter 6
  23. 23Government of South Africa (ed.), Electricity Regulation Amendment Act, Act 38 of 2024. Pretoria, 2024. Cited in chapter 6
  24. 24Government of South Africa (ed.), Carbon Tax Act, Act 15 of 2019. Pretoria, 2019. Cited in chapter 6
  25. 25Government of South Africa (ed.), Disaster Management Act, Act 57 of 2002. Pretoria, 2002. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  26. 26Government of South Africa (ed.), National Water Act, Act 36 of 1998. Pretoria, 1998. Cited in chapter 6
  27. 27Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd (ed.), Integrated Report 2025. Eskom, Johannesburg, 2025. Cited in chapter 8
  28. 28Department of Electricity and Energy (ed.), Integrated Resource Plan 2025. Pretoria, 2025. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  29. 29South African Reserve Bank (ed.), Financial Stability Review. SARB, Pretoria, 2026. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  30. 30National Treasury (ed.), Budget Review 2026. National Treasury, Pretoria, 2026. Cited in chapter 6
  31. 31UNAIDS (ed.), AIDSinfo: South Africa country data. UNAIDS, Geneva, 2026.
  32. 32International Renewable Energy Agency (ed.), Renewable Capacity Statistics 2026. IRENA, Abu Dhabi, 2026.
  33. 33Food and Agriculture Organization (ed.), AQUASTAT: South Africa country profile and water resources data. FAO, Rome. Cited in chapter 8
  34. 34United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (ed.), World Population Prospects 2024. UN DESA, New York, 2024.
  35. 35World Meteorological Organization (ed.), State of the Climate in Africa 2024. WMO, Geneva, 2025. Cited in chapter 6
  36. 36International Energy Agency (ed.), Africa Energy Outlook 2022. IEA, Paris, 2022. Cited in chapter 6
  37. 37UNDRR (ed.), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025. UNDRR, Geneva, 2025. Cited in chapter 6
  38. 38Statistics South Africa (ed.), General Household Survey 2023, Statistical release P0318. Stats SA, Pretoria, 2024. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 6, chapter 8
  39. 39H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.), Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. IPCC, Geneva, 2023. Cited in chapter 6
  40. 40UNDRR (ed.), Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. UNDRR, Geneva, 2015. Cited in chapter 6
  41. 41Convention on Biological Diversity (ed.), Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, Decision 15/4. CBD Secretariat, Montreal, 2022. Cited in chapter 6, chapter 8
  42. 42UNFCCC (ed.), Paris Agreement. United Nations, Paris, 2015. Cited in chapter 6
  43. 43International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Energy Review 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025.
  44. 44Munich Re (ed.), Natural disasters in 2025: NatCatSERVICE full-year figures. Munich Re, Munich, January 2026. Cited in chapter 6
  45. 45P. D. McElwee, P. A. Harrison, T. L. van Huysen et al. (eds.), Thematic Assessment Report on the Interlinkages among Biodiversity, Water, Food and Health. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054 Cited in chapter 6
  46. 46J. Zscheischler, S. Westra, B. J. J. M. van den Hurk et al., “Future climate risk from compound events,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 8, pp. 469–477, 2018. Cited in chapter 6
  47. 47World Health Organization (ed.), World Health Statistics 2025. WHO, Geneva, 2025. Cited in chapter 6
  48. 48S. Valadbaygi (ed.), Reports: The Foundational Edition, Volumes I and II. Reports series, Edition 2026–2030, V1.0. GCRI for the Nexus Consortium, Toronto, 2026.
  49. 49S. Valadbaygi (ed.), Global Systems Risk & Resilience Report 2026: Baseline Edition. GCRI for the Nexus Consortium, Toronto, 2026.

C.2Publication record

Publication

Title
South Africa Systems Risk & Resilience Report 2026, Baseline Edition
Series
Reports · Edition 2026–2030
Edition
Baseline Edition 2026 · inaugural annual
Version
v1.0.0 · draft for stewardship review
Publication ID
NR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Evidence close
30 September 2026
Publication date
October 2026
DOI
concept and version DOI at deposit

Publisher

Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), for the Nexus Consortium
Place
Toronto
Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor
Stewards
GCRI · technical truth · GRF · public meaning · GRA · capital meaning
Licence
text CC BY 4.0; data on the terms of each source
Copyright
© 2026 GCRI · Nexus Consortium
Language
English (en-GB) source edition
Correspondence
Registry correction pathway · editorial office

Colophon

Format
A4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF
Typefaces
Space Grotesk (display) · Geist (text) · IBM Plex Sans Italic (standfirsts) · IBM Plex Mono (data)
Design standard
Reports Foundational Edition, Volume I, Part VII
Accessibility
tagged PDF and HTML targets; text alternatives for every figure
Production
Reports editorial team, GCRI

Release path for this version

Table C.1Release path for this version
StepWhat happensWhen
Drafteditorial self-check complete at evidence closeOctober 2026
Steward reviewfive passes on the exact draft (keys T · M · F · N)Q4 2026
Approvalpublication authority approves the exact digestbefore release
Depositconcept and version DOI minted; registry pointer setat release
Successionthe Q1 2027 edition reports changes against this baselineQ1 2027
Current version
v1.0.0 draft, stewardship review
Previous edition
none, first edition of the series
Next edition
NR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2027-Q1-v1.0.0
Latest version
resolve the concept DOI or the registry record
Correction route
Registry correction pathway
Notice types
erratum · addendum · supersession · withdrawal

C.3Corrections log

0correction notices. No edition has been released yet, so none can be corrected; the log below lists each edition’s current version.

EditionVersionDateStateChangeNotice
ZAFNR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0October 2026DraftBaseline Edition 2026, inaugural annual edition,None

Notice types: erratum, addendum, supersession, withdrawal. A correction is a new version with a published notice; the earlier version stays resolvable, and no edition is ever edited in silence.

C.4Open record

This edition’s open record

Publication ID
NR-COUNTRY-ZAF-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Desk identifier and series alias
NR-NAT-ZAF-2026-BL
Collection
None
DOI
Concept and version DOI at deposit, on Zenodo with DataCite metadata
Versions
Each correction is a new version (isNewVersionOf); the concept DOI resolves to the latest
Bundle
RO-Crate 1.2 with CITATION.cff, CodeMeta and PROV-O provenance; a signed manifest
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0) for original material; metadata CC0 1.0

Credit and identity

ORCID
Your iD in the deposit and the contribution record; DataCite can then add the work to your ORCID record
ROR
Your organisation by its ROR identifier, never by a typed name alone
CRediT
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualisation, Writing, review and editing
Account
None needed to contribute; never a password

Find and follow

Search the open indexes for South Africa; software is cited by its SWHID from Software Heritage, and a quantified scenario run is preregistered on OSF before it is run. Annotation is your choice: Hypothesis opens this page in its own viewer.

Mirrors and harvest

The DOI is canonical. At release each signed bundle is also given an IPFS content identifier and a bloxberg anchor as mirrors; both are listed in the record once they exist. Zenodo exposes every record over OAI-PMH, and reviews and endorsements can arrive through COAR Notify where the repository supports it.

InvenioRDM metadata for a contribution on South Africa, prefilled from this page
{
  "metadata": {
    "resource_type": {
      "id": "dataset"
    },
    "title": "Evidence on South Africa for Nexus Reports",
    "publication_date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
    "creators": [
      {
        "person_or_org": {
          "type": "personal",
          "family_name": "Your family name",
          "given_name": "Your given name",
          "identifiers": [
            {
              "scheme": "orcid",
              "identifier": "0000-0000-0000-0000"
            }
          ]
        },
        "affiliations": [
          {
            "id": "ROR identifier of your organisation"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "description": "What it is, where its record is kept and how it bears on South Africa Systems Risk and Resilience Report 2026.",
    "rights": [
      {
        "id": "cc-by-4.0"
      }
    ],
    "subjects": [
      {
        "subject": "Nexus Reports"
      },
      {
        "subject": "South Africa"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Country Systems Risk & Resilience Report"
      }
    ],
    "related_identifiers": [
      {
        "identifier": "https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/editions/zaf/",
        "scheme": "url",
        "relation_type": {
          "id": "issupplementto"
        },
        "resource_type": {
          "id": "publication-report"
        }
      }
    ],
    "version": "1.0.0"
  },
  "custom_fields": {},
  "access": {
    "record": "public",
    "files": "public"
  },
  "files": {
    "enabled": true
  },
  "parent": {
    "communities": {
      "default": "nexusreports"
    }
  }
}

C.5Where this edition sits among the six pillars

Foundry seals the evidence and Universe tests it; Reports publishes it; Standards takes its corrections and Academy teaches from it.

  1. F03 Sealed observations and indicator series Foundry Sealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
  2. F04 After-action and scenario findings for Universe After-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
  3. F05 National Portfolio movement for chapter Foundry National Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
  4. Applied in editions Standards Nexus Standards: applied in editions.
  5. ZAF edition Reports South Africa 2026, published in every format with its sources, citation and corrections.
  6. F06 Method and correction findings as change Standards Method and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
  7. F12 Q4 synthesis informs the next-year Universe Q4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
  8. Taught in the open Academy Risk Academy: taught in the open.

What Foundry and Universe hand to this edition, and what it hands to Standards, Universe and Academy. From the programme spine; ZAF is a drafted Baseline Edition, so these handoffs run from its first operational quarter.

HandoffBetweenWhat crosses, and when
F03Foundry to ReportsSealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
F04Universe to ReportsAfter-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
F05Foundry to ReportsNational Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
RingNexus Standards to ReportsNexus Standards: applied in editions.
F06Reports to Nexus StandardsMethod and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
F12Reports to UniverseQ4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
RingReports to Risk AcademyRisk Academy: taught in the open.
ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on South Africa.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the GCRI Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskCountry Systems Risk and Resilience

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.