Methodology
How the edition was made: methods, the model card, the evidence cut and its age, the acceptance record and the glossary.
Contents
- ·Edition home
- ·Executive summary
- 1Digital systems fail together
- 2Key findings
- 3Systems and sectors at baseline
- 4Risks and capability
- 5Shared provider failure that overlaps a power or network loss
- 6Readings from the other desks
- 7The 2027 agenda
- 8Systems in depth
- AMethodology
- A.1 Methods
- A.2 Model card, Digital Public Infrastructure Model v0
- A.3 The baseline evidence cut
- A.4 Evidence age and coverage
- A.5 Evidence cards, two anchor sources
- A.6 Publication acceptance record
- A.7 Status words
- A.8 How the edition is made, released and corrected
- A.9 Glossary and abbreviations
- A.10 Technical annex
- BData appendix
- CReferences and record
- ·Complete edition, for print
A.1Methods
The global baseline uses published values and four simple derivations. Each is shown in full so that any reader can reproduce it.
| No. | Derivation | Calculation | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | ENISA incidents per month in the period | 4,875 ÷ 12 | ≈ 406 |
| (2) | Growth in UK nationally significant incidents | 204 ÷ 89 | ≈ 2.3 times |
| (3) | Duration of the AWS event, first impact to end | 11:48 PM to 2:20 PM PDT | 14 h 32 min, ≈ 14.5 h |
| (4) | Duration of the Cloudflare event, first impact to full resolution | 11:20 to 17:06 UTC | 5 h 46 min, ≈ 5.8 h |
| Strength | Definition |
|---|---|
| STRONG | a disruption in the source system has historically changed the target system’s service or output within one season, in more than one region |
| MODERATE | an effect is documented but buffered or slower |
| WEAK | an effect is plausible but not documented at global scale |
| Label | Rule |
|---|---|
| Reported | value as issued by its source, with year |
| Inferred | reasoned from cited evidence; never a measurement |
| Estimated | Nexus analytical value with stated method |
| Scenario | conditional on stated assumptions |
| Expert input | structured editorial judgement awaiting evidence |
A.2Model card, Digital Public Infrastructure Model v0
- Model ID
- MDL-SR10-DPI · v0.1
- Purpose
- represent digital public infrastructure as a dependent stack and the mechanisms by which failures spread between identity, payments, data exchange, cloud, networks and the services that rely on them
- Family
- graph-based system of systems
- Inputs
- the cited sources of this edition; no proprietary data
- Method
- expert-specified coupling strengths (STRONG · MODERATE · WEAK) from assessments and analogue events
- Validation
- none yet, first validation against federation evidence in 2027
- Uncertainty
- qualitative; strengths are hypotheses, not measurements
- Domain of validity
- global scale; not for asset-, site- or country-level use
- Reproducibility
- strength table and sources published in this edition
typed in v0
documented within one season
documented, buffered
plausible, undocumented
A.3The baseline evidence cut
Every Nexus edition is published from a frozen evidence cut. The global baseline cut is documentary: it pins the exact edition of every source cited. Federation cuts begin with the first national Foundry cuts in 2027.
- Cut ID
- DC-STRATEGIC-DPI-GLOBAL-2026-B0
- Type
- baseline documentary cut
- Resolution policy
- pinned · as of 30 September 2026
- Sources pinned
- 43 cited sources, each at the edition and access date in the references
- Model runs
- none at baseline, analytical values are stated with their method
- Digest
- computed at freeze and recorded in the publication record
- Supersedes
- nothing, first cut of the series
- Superseded by
- the 2027 digital public infrastructure annual cut
Lineage
- 01
source edition
- 02
pinned citation
- 03
finding
- 04
page
- 05
publication record
| Element | Baseline 2026 | 2027 global annual |
|---|---|---|
| Sources | cited global publications, pinned by edition | national, regional and sector cuts through one graph |
| Analysis | stated methods and editorial estimates | typed analysis specifications |
| Models | Digital Public Infrastructure Model v0 specification | model runs with receipts |
| Findings | twelve baseline findings | findings re-bound to federation evidence |
| Review | five passes scheduled | five passes on the exact digest |
A.4Evidence age and coverage
A 2026 global edition rests on evidence observed in many different years. This page shows each time base, so that no single year label hides older evidence.
| Indicator | Observed | Released | Cadence | Next release |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software outage | 2024 | Jul 2024 | one-off | none scheduled |
| Cloud event | Oct 2025 | Oct 2025 | per event | next provider report |
| Edge event | Nov 2025 | Nov 2025 | per event | next provider report |
| Cyber advisories | 2024 to 2025 | Feb 2024 · Aug 2025 | per event | next joint advisory |
| EU incident counts | Jul 2024 to Jun 2025 | Oct 2025 · v1.3 Sep 2026 | annual | next ENISA report |
| UK incident counts | Sep 2024 to Aug 2025 | Oct 2025 | annual | next NCSC review |
| Connectivity | 2025 | Nov 2025 | annual | next ITU release |
| Account ownership | 2025 | 2025 | triennial | next Findex |
| Payment volumes | Oct 2025 · Dec 2025 | Nov 2025 · Dec 2025 | monthly | next monthly release |
| Event loss estimate | 2025 | Oct 2025 | per event | may be revised |
| System | Coverage | Thinnest dimension |
|---|---|---|
| Software and cloud | PARTIAL | cross-provider dependency |
| Networks | PARTIAL | cross-operator dependency |
| Identity | THIN | national system coverage |
| Payments | PARTIAL | outage and fraud data |
| Data exchange | THIN | coverage beyond one country |
| Cyber threat | PARTIAL | operator-level data |
| Access and inclusion | GOOD | identity coverage by country |
| Event losses | THIN | common loss basis |
| Field | Source that would fill it | Blocker |
|---|---|---|
| Which public services depend on which shared digital rails, at national scale | operators, regulators and national statistics offices | security-sensitive and not published on a common basis |
| Restoration times for identity and payment services after major outages | operator and regulator reports | not retrieved; no consolidated series |
| ENISA sector breakdown and top threats | ENISA Threat Landscape 2025 full report1 | the publication page was read; the PDF was not opened and the page notes corrected figures in version 1.3 |
| Share of cloud and edge traffic by provider and region | providers and network measurement bodies | not retrieved |
| Outage and fraud data for national payment rails | central banks and payment bodies | only volume reports were read; no incident series found |
| Official statistics pages for UPI and Pix | NPCI and Banco Central do Brasil1314 | official statistics pages returned no figures; values come from press reports of the official data |
| People without official identity from the dataset itself | World Bank ID4D Global Dataset26 | the repository returned an access error; the figure comes from search summaries |
| Number of individuals affected by the 2024 health claims platform breach | US Department of Health and Human Services breach portal28 | portal not opened; a later higher figure appears in a single press report only |
| Full text of the G20 declaration on digital public infrastructure | G20 New Delhi Leaders Declaration27 | not opened; wording taken from press coverage |
| National inventories of identity, payment and data-exchange systems | national authorities | no common register found |
| Common loss basis for cyber events | insurers and event classifiers | one classified event read; no series |
| Capability rungs beyond restoration | operators, regulators, ministries | not reviewed |
A.5Evidence cards, two anchor sources
Issued by the cloud provider. One-off. Role: binds DAT-002. Coverage: one region and services that rely on it. Times are stated in Pacific time.
EVD-SR10-001
AWS post-event summary on the October 2025 disruption4
Issued by the EU Agency for Cybersecurity. Annual. Role: binds CYB-007. Reporting period 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2025; the page notes corrections in version 1.3.
EVD-SR10-002
ENISA Threat Landscape 20251
| Dimension | EVD-SR10-001 | EVD-SR10-002 |
|---|---|---|
| Completeness | event-specific; customer impact varied within the window | incidents analysed; sector split not read |
| Timeliness | published days after the event | about 3 months after the period |
| Revision | single summary | version 1.3 corrected figures |
| Method transparency | root cause and timeline stated | threat-centric method stated |
| External validation | provider statement | agency review |
Evidence cards to follow in 2027
A.6Publication acceptance record
Editorial self-check at evidence close. Every applicable item carries a disposition; the remaining items are review, approval and deposit.
| Group | Area | Items | Pass | N/A | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Identity and scope | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| D2 | Source and data | 12 | 9 | 1 | 2 |
| D3 | Analysis and models | 12 | 3 | 8 | 1 |
| D4 | Findings and claims | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| D5 | Figures, tables, maps | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 |
| D6 | Editorial and citations | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| D7 | Review and approval | 13 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| D8 | Artefact and design | 12 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| D9 | Registry and release | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
Publication gate
- Conditions met
- 14 of 23 at evidence close
- Blocking problems
- none recorded
- Open conditions
- reviews, approval of the exact digest, deposit, registry pointer
Not applicable at baseline
- Model runs
- first runs in Q1 2027
- Maps
- plates in Q2 2027
- Waivers
- none
A.7Status words
| Status | What it means |
|---|---|
| Observed | Measured directly and published by the source. |
| Reported | Published statistics of an official or institutional source. |
| Declared | Stated by the body concerned; not independently measured. |
| Estimated | A Nexus estimate from cited evidence, with its method in Annex A. |
| Modelled | Produced by a stated model from cited inputs. |
| Inferred | Reasoned from cited evidence; not measured. |
| Forecast | A projection by the cited source. |
| Simulated | A simulation result under stated assumptions. |
| Scenario | A conditional statement under stated assumptions; never a prediction. |
| Expert input | Expert judgement, recorded with its basis. |
| Candidate | Proposed for a later edition; not yet evidence. |
| Evidence-quality levels (EQL 1 to 5) grade the source behind a value; they are not a score of the subject. | |
A.8How the edition is made, released and corrected
Every edition is built from a sealed evidence cut, reviewed under three keys, signed and deposited before any site shows it as published; corrections go to Nexus Standards as change proposals and feed the next cut.
| Step | What happens | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 01 Evidence arrives from the pillars | Foundry seals observations and indicator series, Universe hands over after-action and scenario findings, and contributions are screened at every gateway, including this site’s. | |
| 02 The cut is sealed | On the cut date the evidence is pinned under one identifier, so anyone can rebuild the edition from exactly what it was built on. | |
| 03 The edition is assembled | The edition is drafted from its template and content pack. Agents may draft; they never publish and never decide. | |
| 04 The keys turn | At the publisher of record the truth key comes first: every value is checked against its source or stated method before the meaning and capital keys turn. No edition moves on until every key has been turned by a named steward. | |
| 05 The gate opens | A named approver releases one exact digest of the edition; any change after this point is a new version, never a silent edit. | |
| 06 Signed and deposited | The PDF, the web edition and the data bundle are signed together with a manifest and an RO-Crate description, and deposited on Zenodo with a concept and a version DOI. | |
| 07 Published on its desk’s site | Only then does the edition show as published on its desk’s Reports site, and the Collection lists it as a part. | |
| 08 Corrections go to Standards | Method and correction findings go to Nexus Standards as change proposals; citations, corrections and new contributions feed the next evidence cut. |
A teaching model of the process, not a forecast and not a record of any run; dates and counts on this page come from the programme record. Sources: Reports governance at GCRI Canada (2026); Zenodo, repository of record for Reports deposits (2026).
Lifecycle, one state at a time: Draft, Computed, Evidence bound, Reviewed, Approved for release, Published, Corrected, Superseded. This edition is a draft.
A.9Glossary and abbreviations
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Baseline Edition | the inaugural annual edition that fixes the reference state for the series |
| WEFH+B | water, energy, food, health and biodiversity, the national nexus core |
| Coupling | a typed dependency through which one system transmits to another |
| Protection gap | the share of losses not covered by insurance |
| Capability ladder | LISTED → EXISTS → ADEQUATE → TESTED → DEMONSTRATED |
| EQL | evidence-quality level, 1–5 |
| Evidence cut | a frozen resolution of exact sources and versions |
| NNC · NLC · NWG | National Nexus Consortium · National Leadership Council · National Working Groups |
| Abbreviation | Expansion |
|---|---|
| CISA | US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency |
| CMC | Cyber Monitoring Centre |
| CSF | Cybersecurity Framework |
| DNS | Domain Name System |
| DORA | Digital Operational Resilience Act |
| DPI | digital public infrastructure |
| ENISA | European Union Agency for Cybersecurity |
| ITU | International Telecommunication Union |
| NCSC | UK National Cyber Security Centre |
| NIS2 | second Network and Information Security Directive |
| NPCI | National Payments Corporation of India |
| UPI | Unified Payments Interface |
A.10Technical annex
| Item | Annex | Contents | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A.1 | Indicator definitions | the global indicator set, with units and sources | IN THIS EDITION |
| A.2 | Coupling strengths | the twenty-cell matrix and its rationale | IN THIS EDITION |
| A.3 | Scenario specification | SCN-SR10-DPI-01 assumptions and signposts | IN THIS EDITION |
| A.4 | Capability placements | rung evidence for fifteen functions | IN THIS EDITION |
| A.5 | Model diagnostics | first runs and validation | 2027 |
| A.6 | Sensitivity analyses | influence of coupling strengths | 2027 |
| A.7 | Regional notes | regional digital cards | WITH REGIONAL EDITIONS |
| A.8 | Review statements | pass-by-pass review record | AT RELEASE |
A.1 · indicator definition: nationally significant incident
- Construct
- a cyber incident that the national agency classes in the top three categories of its classification model
- Unit
- incidents per year
- Method
- incident management data of one national agency
- Source
- NCSC Annual Review8
- Uncertainty
- classification and reporting practice change over time
- Known limits
- one country; not comparable with counts from other agencies
Notes
Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references
- 1ENISA (ed.), ENISA Threat Landscape 2025 (publication page; period 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2025; published 1 October 2025; 4,875 incidents; version 1.3 of 22 September 2026). European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, Athens. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
- 13Entrackr, UPI hits all-time high of 20.7 bn transactions in October (press report of NPCI data: 20.7 billion transactions, Rs 27.28 lakh crore, up 25% and 16% year on year); the NPCI statistics page returned no figures. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
- 14Agência Brasil, Pix bate recorde e supera 313 milhões de transações em um dia (press report of Banco Central do Brasil data: about 313.3 million transactions and R$ 179.9 billion on 5 December 2025; previous record 297.4 million on 28 November 2025); the central bank statistics page returned no figures. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
- 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: World Bank (ed.), ID4D Global Dataset 2021, Volume 1: Global ID Coverage Estimates (just under 850 million people without official proof of identity in 2021; about half children; 194 countries), taken from search-result summaries; the repository returned an access error. World Bank, Washington, 2022. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
- 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights, Change Healthcare cybersecurity incident (about 100 million notices sent by October 2024), taken from search-result summaries of HHS statements; a later figure of 192.7 million appears in one press report and is not used. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
- 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: G20, New Delhi Leaders’ Declaration, 9 to 10 September 2023 (welcomed the G20 Framework for Systems of Digital Public Infrastructure and a global repository of digital public infrastructure), taken from press coverage of the declaration. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
- 4Amazon Web Services (ed.), Summary of the Amazon DynamoDB service disruption in the Northern Virginia (US-EAST-1) Region, 19 to 20 October 2025 (post-event summary). Amazon Web Services, Seattle. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
- 6CISA, NSA, FBI and partner agencies (eds.), Joint cybersecurity advisory AA24-038A on state-sponsored actor persistent access to critical infrastructure networks, 7 February 2024 (page text read to character 100,000 of 132,303). CISA, Arlington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
- 7CISA and partner agencies (eds.), Joint cybersecurity advisory AA25-239A on state-sponsored actor compromise of networks worldwide, 27 August 2025 (revised 3 September 2025). CISA, Arlington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
- 8National Cyber Security Centre (ed.), NCSC Annual Review 2025, incident management chapter and news item (period 1 September 2024 to 31 August 2025; 429 incidents; 204 nationally significant; 18 highly significant). NCSC, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
