Skip to content

GCRI · Reports

Supporting methods

The research behind Reports: the questions it asks, the models and measurements it uses, how uncertainty is stated and how a result is reviewed and reproduced before it is published.

01Workspace

The workspace for supporting methods.

Evidence register

Reports · Supporting methods · Example interface, not a record

Register currentGCRI · Reports

Indicators

unit · cadence · label

Editions in productioneditionsweeklyPublished statisticsSP-4045
Values traced to sources of valuesper editionDERIVEDSP-4326
Review roundsroundsper editionPublished statisticsSP-1751
Corrections issuedcorrectionsquarterlyPublished statisticsSP-3103
DownloadscountmonthlyOBSERVEDSP-8384

Source passport

Source
Manuscript system
Licence
open · attribution
Steward
Data editor
Coverage
87 pct of places
Known limits
sparse in uplands

Coverage by place

Evidence register.Illustrative interface; not live data.

Reports · Evidence register. Evidence register: example names and illustrative values, not a record.

02Questions

What the research asks.

  1. 01

    Global systems series

    Interdependent global system risks.

  2. 02

    Country and regional series

    National and transboundary portfolio studies.

  3. 03

    Sectoral series

    Sector and industry profiles.

  4. 04

    Frontier technology risk assessment

    Exponentially developing technologies.

  5. 05

    Scenarios and methods

    Transparent analytical studies.

  6. 06

    Labs and foundry series

    Technical test and readiness evidence.

03Open questions

What Reports research cannot yet answer well enough for decisions.

The editorial research agenda concerns how systemic risk evidence is communicated without losing its uncertainty or its limits.

  • How should uncertainty be shown in figures read by non-specialists without being ignored or overread?
  • Which formats help decision-makers distinguish modelled, observed and scenario evidence at a glance?
  • How can corrections reach readers who used an earlier version?
  • How should cross-field findings be reviewed when no single reviewer covers every field?
04Evidence

Every result keeps its label.

Results are labelled as observed, published statistics, estimated, modelled, forecast, scenario or expert judgement. Missing data is shown as missing, never filled silently.

Methods

Methods and uncertainty

How results are produced and where they stop

Sources

Source and data register

Where data comes from and on what terms

Publications

Reviewed outputs

Citable work with its editorial status

ReportsContribute

Contribute evidence from this page.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRIReportsGlobal Systems Risk and ResilienceCountry Systems Risk and ResilienceCountry Quarterly
Reports

Bring a method, a dataset or a question.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.