The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI)
The interdependence of this field with others is unusual: systems science is not one system among many, but the method through which the links between all other systems are represented. Its strengths and weaknesses propagate into every field that uses it. This page sets out how the field depends on others, how others depend on it, and the consequences when modelling goes wrong, as part of the field overview.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 3
Hazards and exposure, for this page
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
For dependencies and consequences, in GCRI's spatial-intelligence reading, the map opens on true-colour imagery, flood water and night lights with relief in 3D, framed on North America; every other NASA layer, live feed and forecast waits in the layer list.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place; claim ceiling INTEGRATED.
Layers and dates
Dependencies and consequences in Systems Science and Modelling describe how methods and modelling, risk management and systemic risk, and research and evidence connect to other systems through physical, economic, social and ecological links, and how stress travels along them toward fields such as those of Research Nexus and Policy Nexus. Every dependency map states its assumptions, data and uncertainty; it describes connections, not a forecast.
Fig.How GCRI, GRF and GRA share one field while the authorities decide. Design, not a record.
The working screen behind this subject: its structure, terms and states. Names are placeholders and values illustrative.
| Dependency | Why it matters | Where it is studied |
|---|---|---|
| Domain science | Models are only as good as the understanding of processes they encode | GCRI field platforms such as Water Nexus and Climate and Hazards |
| Observations | Calibration and validation require data | Space and Earth Observation and Data and Compute |
| Computing | Large ensembles and coupled models need compute | Computing in the STEM Commons |
| Experiments | Testbeds provide controlled evidence | Nexus Labs |
Each Nexus field uses statistics, networks, optimisation or simulation.
Financial risk models share methods, developed with GRA's Actuarial and Quantitative Risk.
Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Interdependency | A two-way dependency between infrastructures, such as power needing telecoms for control while telecoms need power to run. |
| Cascading risk | Risk that a failure in one system or component triggers failures in others that depend on it. |
| Compound event | Two or more hazards or drivers occurring together or in sequence whose joint impact exceeds what either would cause alone, such as drought followed by intense rain; IPCC assessments use the term. |
| Dependency mapping | Tracing the people, processes, technology, facilities and suppliers a service relies on. |
Models are not neutral observers. When a flood model informs zoning, it changes where people build; when a market model is widely used, it can change how markets behave. Social scientists call this reflexivity. It means that models of social-technical systems must be revisited as their use changes the system, a theme explored in agent-based and complexity models.
At The Global Risks Forum (GRF), the Policy Nexus convenes dialogue on how model evidence enters policy decisions.
The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.