G01 · METHOD · extreme-valueGCRI dossier · service level R0
GCRIWater NexusEstablished
Method page · Extreme value theory and tail risk

Extreme value theory and tail risk in water

Extreme-value statistics gives the return period its meaning: how rare a flow, a rainfall depth or a dry spell is, and how uncertain that estimate is when the record is short.

Publisher
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation
Field
Water, Climate and hazards, Critical infrastructure
Status
Established
Service level
R0: information and enquiries
Research workbench, illustrative interfaceAn illustrative research workbench: a compound drought and heat scenario with an observed history and a scenario range, a model card listing method, version, inputs, uncertainty and review, and three policy options compared side by side.SCENARIOCompound drought and heatWATER · ENERGY · HEALTH · ILLUSTRATIVEMODELLED1007550250T0T+1T+2T+3T+4T+5NOWOBSERVEDSCENARIO RANGEGRID STRESS INDEX · PLACEHOLDERMODEL CARDMETHODCoupled hydro-energyVERSIONv2.1INPUTSVersioned sourcesUNCERTAINTYEnsemble rangeREVIEWDomain reviewPOLICY OPTIONSDemand response01Reservoir rules02Hospital backup03

Water NexusWireframe of the working environment, not a live screen. Names and values are placeholders.

STEM methods
9
Canonical methods this field applies
Topics
8
Subject pages in the field
Counterparts
10
Platforms in shared fields at GCRI, GRF and GRA
Report series
3
Nexus Reports series it contributes to
01Application

Extreme value theory and tail risk in water, climate and hazards and critical infrastructure.

Extreme value theory and tail risk study the behaviour of rare, high-impact events. They provide methods to estimate the magnitude and frequency of extremes beyond the range of observed data. In water, climate and hazards and critical infrastructure, extreme value methods set design levels and capital buffers for rare events. Tail dependence analysis reveals when extremes in different systems tend to occur together. The canonical description is on the STEM Commons.

Return-period flows and rainfall

Generalised extreme-value or peaks-over-threshold distributions are fitted to annual maxima, with confidence intervals reported alongside the point estimate.

Regional frequency analysis

Short records are pooled across hydrologically similar catchments so ungauged sites inherit a defensible frequency curve.

Compound and non-stationary extremes

Dependence between rainfall and surge, or drought and heat, is modelled with copulas; trends in the record are tested and, where present, the frequency curve is allowed to move.

02Field

Water Nexus on the map.

Where this page’s subject sits in the world: boundaries and context now, the field layers when the interactive map loads.

Field · world viewDesign figure until live
World map, Equal Earth projectionLand and country boundaries from Natural Earth at 1:110 million, drawn in the Equal Earth projection with a fifteen degree graticule. The interactive map with its layers loads through the Nexus Foundry plugin.
GCRI · Water Nexus · fieldDESIGN FIGURE

MapWorld map in the Equal Earth projection, land and boundaries from Natural Earth (public domain). The interactive map loads through the Nexus Foundry plugin (globe or flat view).

03Canvas

The method as a run graph.

Data from the source register feeds the methods; calibration and an independent test gate the estimate and its limits; the decision stays with the competent authority.

Method canvas · Extreme value theory and tail risk as applied hereDesign, not a record
Extreme value theory and tail risk in Water Nexus: the method as a run graphData from the source register feeds the methods; calibration and an independent test gate the estimate and its limits; the decision stays with the competent authority. Design of the method’s use, not a record of a run.runs / water-nexus / stem / extreme-valueDESIGN RUN+−FITPLAYLAYOUT · LRSOURCE REGISTEREXTREME VALUE THEORY AND TAIL RISKVALIDATIONOUTPUTSAUTHORITYLong…DATASETsource registerlabel carriedDONEInsurance loss…DATASETsource registerlabel carriedDONEFinancial return…DATASETsource registerlabel carriedDONEPaleo and histor…DATASETsource registerlabel carriedDONEBlock maxima ana…MODELExtreme value…assumptions statedRUNNINGPeaks over thres…MODELExtreme value…assumptions statedDONEReturn level…MODELExtreme value…assumptions statedDONEMultivariate ext…MODELExtreme value…assumptions statedDONECalibrationGATEfit on one periodtest on anotherGATEIndependent testGATEheld-out dataskill reportedQUEUEDEstimate with ra…DATASETuncertainty attachedlabel: MODELLEDQUEUEDLimits statementTASKwhat it cannot sayversionedQUEUEDDecisionDECISIONcompetent authorityunder its own rulesAUTHORITYRUN TIMELINE · ONE APPLICATIONDataFitTestEstimateDecideLong…Insurance loss…Financial return…Paleo and historica…Block maxima analys…Peaks over threshol…Return level…NOWINSPECTOR · SELECTED NODECalibration · gateOWNERWater Nexus · method stewardINPUTS4 method runsCHECKFits are checked with diagnostic plots, goodness-of-fit…EVIDENCEskill on the test period onlyUNLOCKSindependent test

Fig. 01Nodes carry their type, metrics and state; connectors show what feeds what; the gates are the validation steps; the timeline is one application. Design of the method’s use, not a record of a run.

04Data

What the method consumes.

Datasets and records used by extreme value theory and tail risk on this platform, with the role each plays and the label its values carry. Sources are listed in the source register.

DataRoleLabel
Annual maximum seriesDistribution fittingOBSERVED
Peaks over thresholdDistribution fittingOBSERVED
Regional catchment descriptorsPooling groupsESTIMATED
Climate model projectionsNon-stationary scenariosMODELLED
05Validation

How results are checked.

Fits are checked with diagnostic plots, goodness-of-fit tests and out-of-sample comparison. Sensitivity to threshold and record length is reported.

CheckHow it is done
Goodness of fitSeveral distributions are compared; the choice and its effect on the estimate are reported
Bootstrap uncertaintyConfidence intervals are resampled, not assumed
Stationarity testsTrend and change-point tests precede any quoted return period

Extrapolation far beyond the data is highly uncertain. Changing climates and markets violate stationarity assumptions.

06Connections

Topics that rely on this method.

07Stewardship

Who maintains the method.

Reinsurance and Catastrophe stewards extreme value theory and tail risk for the Consortium and reviews how it is applied across platforms.

08Connected

Where this page leads across the Consortium.

LinkRelationshipWhy
Extreme value theory and tail riskCanonical method pagePlatform application links to the canonical method page.
Extreme value theory and tail risk in reinsurance and catastropheSteward platformReinsurance and Catastrophe stewards this method.
09Questions

Questions and answers.

What are the limits of extreme value theory and tail risk in this field?
Extrapolation far beyond the data is highly uncertain. Changing climates and markets violate stationarity assumptions.
How are results checked?
Fits are checked with diagnostic plots, goodness-of-fit tests and out-of-sample comparison. Sensitivity to threshold and record length is reported.
Are the values on this page real?
The data names, roles and checks are real descriptions of practice. The canvas shows a design of the method’s use, not a run; no result is reported here.
Where else is this method applied?
The canonical method page lists every platform that applies it.
Water Nexus

Bring your expertise to this field.

The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

Have questions?