GCRI · Programmes
Universe technical office
Universe is the annual operating, integration, exercise and learning programme of the Nexus Consortium. The Global Risks Forum (GRF) governs it and publishes it at universe.nexus. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) runs the technical office: mission scoping, data and method qualification, the Core build, exercise control support and evidence capture. Governance, editions and participation belong to GRF. Part of GCRI programmes.
The workspace for universe technical office.
Workstream tracker
Universe technical office · Programme year 3 · Example interface, not a record
Workstreams
owner · stage · status
| Evidence label audit | Independent reviewer | Test | M3 · week 20 | At risk |
| National Model build | Independent reviewer | Test | M3 · week 31 | On track |
| Annual mission design | Independent reviewer | Review | M7 · week 31 | Blocked |
| Report edition planning | Competent authority | Test | M4 · week 20 | On track |
| Methods review cycle | National Desk | Scoping | M6 · week 38 | On track |
Effort against plan
person-weeks
Milestones
- W3M1Evidence label audit: scoping note signed
- W16M2Inputs qualified at the gate
- W25M3National Model build: build review
- W29M4Controlled test with observers
- W38M5Publication and decision record
GCRI · Workstream tracker. Workstream tracker: example names and illustrative values, not a record.
What the technical office does.
The technical office works through the year, not only in the week of exercises. Its outputs are records that the programme’s governance, evaluators and reviewers can inspect.
| Work | What it produces |
|---|---|
| Mission scoping | A mission scope with objectives, data, methods and evaluation questions |
| Qualification | Qualification records for data, methods and contributed resources |
| Core build | Build evidence, measured readiness and known defects for the temporary Core |
| Exercise support | Support to exercise controllers and independent evaluators |
| Evidence capture | Run, decision and observation records sealed for review |
| Closeout | A technical closeout and an improvement backlog |
Mission teams, contributors and hosts.
Mission teams
Qualified teams bringing a mission admitted at gate G1.
Contributors
Computing and network contributors with a resource offer. See Network and Core.
Hosts
Hosts and venues, whose readiness is evidenced before any event is presented as confirmed.
How the process runs.
Process
Universe technical office: Policy question to decision
A priority becomes a question, evidence, a decision case and a limited publication; the competent authority decides, never the programme.
01 Question
- 01A priority becomes a questionStep · Universe; national counterpartsA priority becomes a researchable question with stated criteria. National counterparts own the agenda, data and decisions.
- 03Scientific and stakeholder challengeStep · GCRI; GRFScientific and affected-stakeholder challenge informs mission selection and methods.
02 Evidence and options
- 04Assemble the evidenceStep · GCRIMethods, labelled data and uncertainty are assembled. Every finding carries one of nine evidence labels.
- 06Decision case with optionsRecord · The decision owner named in the caseA decision case binds owner, alternatives, evidence and deadline. It needs sensitivity and robustness.
03 Review and publication
- 07G6 · Publication authorisedGate · The Global Risks ForumGRF authorises publication of results that have passed scientific and editorial review. It cannot publish personal data.
- 08Publish with method, uncertainty and limitsRecord · ReportsFindings are published with their method, uncertainty and limits. An edition is published after review, not to a calendar.
04 Outside the programme
- 02Competent authority decidesDecision · The competent authorityThe authority or institution decides under its own rules. The authority decides; the programme informs.
- 05Action and implementation stay with the ownersActor · The relevant government, operator or licensed institutionDecisions and execution stay with the relevant government, operator or licensed institution. The programme records one only if shared.
05 Learning
- 09Corrections and lessons feed the next agendaStep · UniverseCorrections and lessons feed the next annual agenda. The findings of one year set the mandate of the next.
The Nexus cycle · Decision rights · The programme yearDesigned programme process, not a record of operation. No cycle has run and every programme is at service level R0. A gate is a programme decision, never a public-authority approval, certification or deployment authorisation.
Where the technical office stops.
- GRF governs the programme; the technical office has no governance role.
- Neither membership nor sponsorship secures a compute allocation, and an offer is not an allocation.
- The final stage is a planned stand-down; review, reconciliation and corrections continue afterwards.
- No edition, date or host is shown until its record exists.
Where the programme is published.
The independent programme website is Universe. Governance and participation: GRF’s Universe at GRF and Programme governance. Finance readiness: The Global Risks Alliance (GRA), Universe finance-readiness programme. The cycle: Annual programme cycle. Information and enquiries are open today.
Questions and answers.
Who runs Universe?
How does a mission get into Universe?
Can my organisation contribute computing to Universe?
Is Universe a conference?
Bring a method, a dataset or a question.
Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.
Legal documents.
Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.