GCRI · Work with GCRI
Universities and researchers
Universities, research institutes and laboratories can collaborate with The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) on research, independent review and methods. Work starts from a research protocol and agreed terms for contributions, rights and publication. Ethics review follows the institutions and jurisdictions involved. Negative findings and independent scrutiny always stay possible. Part of Work with GCRI.
The order things happen in.
- 01QuestionNational, regional or institutional priority
- 02EvidenceSTEM foundation of the platform
- 03BuildFoundry
- 04OrganiseNexus ecosystem
- 05TestUniverse (independent site)
- 06PublishReports
- 07DecideCompetent authorities and institutions, through NXS-RLS (participants, agreements and handoffs)
- 08RenewCorrections and the next annual agenda
Three ways to work together.
Each starts with a written protocol and agreed terms.
Independent review
Review of GCRI methods and findings by researchers with managed conflicts.
Methods and teaching
Contributions to method pages in the STEM Commons and to learning routes.
What is agreed at the start.
- 01
Research protocol
Questions, methods, data, roles and timeline.
- 02
Resource decision
What each party contributes, including any computing or data access, and on what terms.
- 03
Rights
Background intellectual property, joint results, third-party material and protected community knowledge are treated separately.
- 04
Publication route
Where and how results are published, authorship by contribution and the review that precedes release.
How the process runs.
Process
Universities and researchers: Working group, charter to sunset
A working group is chartered by record for a fixed timebox, delivers bounded assignments, drafts and recommends, then dissolves unless renewed; it does not adopt.
01 Form
- 01NLC proposes the groupDecision · National Leadership CouncilThe NLC proposes working groups and nominates chairs, editors and experts from its leadership pools. It does not charter.
- 02Charter by recordDecision · National Standards CouncilA working group is chartered by record for a timebox of at most twenty-four months. The charter sets its scope, roles and decision rule.
- 03Members join by competenceStep · MembersExperts, practitioners, students and volunteers join by competence. Members declare interests and recuse on conflict.
02 Work
- 04Workplan from the national agendaStepAssignments come from the national agenda and the year’s missions. Each states the competence it needs and how the work will be reviewed.
- 05Drafts and deliverables, delivered monthlyRecordGroups deliver monthly. For standards they draft the national profile and deviation register and run national public comment and pilots.
03 Review
- 06Contribution record and reviewGateEach contribution is recorded and reviewed. A working group drafts and recommends; it does not adopt.
- 07Recognition follows the recordRecordContribution records are kept, so that recognition follows the record.
- 08National adoption is decided elsewhereDecision · National Standards CouncilThe National Standards Council decides the adoption mode and the national profile. The working group proposes and never decides.
04 Close
- 09Dissolved by default, or renewed by recordDecision · National Standards CouncilA group is dissolved by default at the end of the timebox. The National Standards Council renews or closes it, on the NLC’s proposal.
National Working Groups · National Standards Council · Decision rightsDesigned programme process, not a record of operation. No cycle has run and every programme is at service level R0. A gate is a programme decision, never a public-authority approval, certification or deployment authorisation. No working group is constituted. The charter rules belong to the proposed Nexus Standards working model.
What you receive, contribute and can expect.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| What you receive | A research protocol, a resource decision, contribution and rights terms and a publication route |
| What you contribute | Research expertise, staff time and any data or facilities agreed in the protocol |
| Cost | Determined in each protocol; no general fee applies to research collaboration |
| Who is accountable | The GCRI organisation named in the terms, GCRI Canada or GCRI US |
| How to leave or raise a concern | Withdraw at any time under the agreed terms; concerns go to the integrity concern form |
Integrity is not negotiable.
- Ethics review as required by the institutions and jurisdictions involved, before work with people begins
- Negative findings and independent scrutiny always remain possible
- No funder, sponsor or host can suppress a result or a limitation
- Funding and conflicts disclosed with each publication
- Corrections recorded as new versions
Integrity rules are set out under research integrity. The Global Risks Forum (GRF) runs a research and universities constituency for leadership dialogue. Information and enquiries are open today: an enquiry receives a reference, and the acknowledgement names the next step.
Questions and answers.
How do we propose a collaboration?
Who owns joint results?
Can students join a collaboration?
Does GCRI fund research?
Bring a method, a dataset or a question.
Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.
Legal documents.
Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.