GCRI · Mathematics, statistics and data
Decision analysis under uncertainty
Decision analysis under uncertainty provides structured methods for choosing among options when outcomes are uncertain and objectives conflict. It makes trade-offs and value judgements explicit. Systemic Risk Management stewards this page for the Nexus Consortium.
Decision analysis under uncertainty in six parts.
- 01The methodWhat decision analysis under uncertainty covers
- 02Reference practiceDecision analysis is codified in risk and evaluation practice
- 03In systemic risk workChoosing when probabilities are contested
- 04Applied inPlatforms that apply this method
- 05StewardshipWho maintains this page
- 06SourcesWhere this page’s references lead
What decision analysis under uncertainty covers.
- 01
Core methods
decision trees; multi-criteria decision analysis; value of information analysis; robust decision making; expected utility analysis; adaptive pathways planning.
- 02
Data and instruments
expert elicitation; model outputs; stakeholder preference surveys; cost and benefit estimates; scenario sets.
- 03
Validation
Analyses are checked through sensitivity analysis, peer review and stakeholder scrutiny. Retrospective review compares decisions with outcomes.
- 04
Limits
Results depend on elicited probabilities and preferences that may be biased. Deep uncertainty can make expected value comparisons misleading.
- 05
Use in risk decisions
Decision analysis helps choose actions that perform acceptably across interconnected risks and uncertain futures. It clarifies when to act now and when to keep options open.
Decision analysis is codified in risk and evaluation practice.
| Reference | What it sets |
|---|---|
| ISO 31000 risk treatment | Selecting treatment options |
| Robust decision-making and dynamic adaptive pathways | Decisions under deep uncertainty |
| Cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis guidance | Appraisal of options |
How the process runs.
Process
Decision analysis under uncertainty: Coastal flood adaptation pathways
Hazard and impact steps follow coastal flood practice; pathway steps follow dynamic adaptive policy pathways (Haasnoot and others, 2013), with signposts and tipping points.
01 Hazard
- 01Sea level scenariosDatasetSea level scenarios set the range of future mean sea level. The scenario set and horizon come from the source the page names.
- 02Surge and tide recordsDatasetRecords of storm surge and tide supply the short-term water level variation.
- 03Extreme water levelsModelSea level, surge and tide are combined into extreme water levels by return period, using a joint probability approach.
02 Impact
- 04Flood modelModelA flood model maps overtopping and inundation for each scenario. The place is set by the page.
- 05ExposureDatasetExposure lists the people, assets and ports in the flooded area.
- 06DamageModelDepth-damage functions turn flood depth into expected damage, for example expected annual damage.
03 Pathways
- 07Adaptation tipping pointsGateAn adaptation tipping point is the condition under which a measure stops meeting its objectives as conditions change.
- 08Adaptation pathwaysStepPathways sequence measures and the signposts that show when to switch. Signposts are monitored to see whether adaptation is needed.
- 09Decision and review datesDecision · Competent authorityThe responsible body chooses a pathway and sets review dates. The body is set by the page.
Neutral outline of a published external standard or method, from its issuing body. Not a record of operation. Nexus does not perform, certify or approve any step shown. A gate or decision belongs to the party the source names. The DAPP paper was identified from its citation record and abstract summary; its full text was not read.
Choosing when probabilities are contested.
Under deep uncertainty, decision analysis seeks options that perform acceptably across many futures and adaptive pathways that can change course as information arrives. It supports decision-makers; it does not replace their judgement on values.
- Make value judgements explicit.
- Identify signposts that trigger pathway changes.
- Compare options across scenarios.
- Applications on Risk Management and Disaster Resilience and Recovery.
Platforms that apply this method.
- CampaignsInstitutionGCRI
- AgencyInstitutionGCRI
- Systemic Risk ManagementInstitutionGCRI
- Disaster Resilience and RecoveryInstitutionGCRI
- Policy NexusInstitutionGRF
- Foresight NexusInstitutionGRF
- Governance NexusInstitutionGRF
- Disaster and Crisis GovernanceInstitutionGRF
- Development Finance NexusInstitutionGRA
- Institutional Funds NexusInstitutionGRA
- Sovereign Capital NexusInstitutionGRA
- Disaster Risk FinanceInstitutionGRA
- Public Finance and Sovereign DebtInstitutionGRA
- Systems Science and ModellingInstitutionGCRI
Who maintains this page.
Systemic Risk Management stewards decision analysis under uncertainty: it keeps this description current and reviews how the method is applied across the platforms.
Where this page’s references lead.
The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.
Questions and answers.
Why does one institution host every method page?
How do I suggest a correction to a method page?
Contribute evidence from this page.
Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- EmailGateway GW-GCRISend it from this pageEvidence, a correction, a case, a method, a review, a translation or profile input. It arrives tagged with this page, so the editor who owns it receives it.
- ZenodoOpen depositDeposit it and submit to the communityPublish your own record on Zenodo with your ORCID iD, then submit it to the Reports community there. Curators review it; the DOI stays yours.
- ReportsGCRISee every way to contributeThe contribution types, how each is reviewed, what credit you receive, the licence and what is never accepted.
Never send personal data, sensitive infrastructure detail or anything you have no right to share. A contribution is reviewed before use; sending it confers no authorship or editorial rights, and sponsorship never buys a finding.
Bring a method, a dataset or a question.
Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.
Legal documents.
Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.