GCRI · Mathematics, statistics and data
Scenario design and stress testing
Scenario design and stress testing construct plausible, severe future conditions to examine how systems and institutions would perform. They complement probabilistic analysis where data are scarce or futures are deeply uncertain. Systemic Risk Management stewards this page for the Nexus Consortium.
Scenario design and stress testing on the record.
- 01InstitutionThe Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI)
- 02The methodWhat scenario design and stress testing covers
- 03Reference practiceScenario and stress testing follow supervisory and planning practice
- 04In systemic risk workSevere, plausible and combined
- 05Applied inPlatforms that apply this method
- 06StewardshipWho maintains this page
- 07SourcesWhere this page’s references lead
What scenario design and stress testing covers.
- 01
Core methods
narrative scenario development; reverse stress testing; macro-financial stress testing; multi-hazard scenario construction; tabletop exercises; cascading impact mapping.
- 02
Data and instruments
historical analogues; model outputs; expert workshops; supervisory scenario frameworks; exposure and balance sheet data.
- 03
Validation
Scenarios are reviewed for plausibility, internal consistency and severity relative to history. Exercise outcomes are compared with actual events when they occur.
- 04
Limits
Scenario choice can reflect prevailing assumptions and miss novel combinations. Results depend on how participants and models represent responses.
- 05
Use in risk decisions
Stress tests reveal vulnerabilities that arise when several risks materialise together. They inform capital, contingency and coordination plans across sectors.
Scenario and stress testing follow supervisory and planning practice.
| Reference | What it sets |
|---|---|
| NGFS scenarios | Climate scenarios for financial analysis |
| Supervisory stress testing | Severe but plausible scenarios |
| Reverse stress testing | Scenarios that break a system |
How the process runs.
Process
Scenario design and stress testing: Bank stress test
The Basel stress testing principles describe severe but plausible scenarios, a method to quantify impact, and use of results; hurdles depend on the exercise.
01 Scenario and balance sheet
- 01Scenario designDataset · Independent reviewerScenarios capture the material risks identified, with a narrative explaining how. They are severe but plausible and varied.
- 03Balance sheet projectionModel · Independent reviewerMethods range from point-in-time static approaches to dynamic simulations that reflect future business activities and management actions.
02 Risk impacts
- 04Credit lossesModel · Credit risk functionCredit risk is one risk the scenario must capture. Banks also keep a model inventory and a validation function for stress models.
- 05EarningsModel · Independent reviewerThe risk identification process includes earnings vulnerabilities. Net interest income under a rate path is one common view.
- 06Market and counterparty lossesModel · Independent reviewerMarket stress tests supplement value-at-risk models with factor shocks or integrated scenarios, historic or hypothetical.
03 Capital and actions
- 02Management actionsStep · Independent reviewerWhere management actions enter supervisory submissions, authorities check they fit the bank’s other strategic plans, such as recovery plans.
- 07Compare projected capital with requirementsStep · Independent reviewerStress tests quantify risks and inform their understanding. Depending on objectives, they may or may not use hurdle rates or thresholds.
04 Authority
- 08Authority use of the resultsDecision · Independent reviewerAuthorities may use results as one supervisory input. For capital adequacy, they consider the response to deficiencies.
Outline of an external standard or method, from its public sources. It describes what the framework says, not a record of any run. It does not show that Nexus or any partner performs, certifies or approves a step. A gate is a step of the method, never a Nexus approval.
Severe, plausible and combined.
Scenarios explore futures that cannot be assigned reliable probabilities. Systemic stress tests combine shocks across systems: a heat wave with a grid failure and a cyber incident. Reverse stress tests start from failure and ask what would cause it.
- Combine shocks across systems.
- Use reverse stress tests to find vulnerabilities.
- Do not present scenarios as forecasts.
- Applications on Risk Management.
Platforms that apply this method.
- Systemic Risk ManagementInstitutionGCRI
- Foresight NexusInstitutionGRF
- Asset Management NexusInstitutionGRA
- Private Equity NexusInstitutionGRA
- Institutional Funds NexusInstitutionGRA
- Financial StabilityInstitutionGRA
- Climate and Nature Financial RiskInstitutionGRA
- Public Finance and Sovereign DebtInstitutionGRA
- Private CreditInstitutionGRA
Who maintains this page.
Systemic Risk Management stewards scenario design and stress testing: it keeps this description current and reviews how the method is applied across the platforms.
Where this page’s references lead.
The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.
Questions and answers.
Why does one institution host every method page?
How do I suggest a correction to a method page?
Contribute evidence from this page.
Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- EmailGateway GW-GCRISend it from this pageEvidence, a correction, a case, a method, a review, a translation or profile input. It arrives tagged with this page, so the editor who owns it receives it.
- ZenodoOpen depositDeposit it and submit to the communityPublish your own record on Zenodo with your ORCID iD, then submit it to the Reports community there. Curators review it; the DOI stays yours.
- ReportsGCRISee every way to contributeThe contribution types, how each is reviewed, what credit you receive, the licence and what is never accepted.
Never send personal data, sensitive infrastructure detail or anything you have no right to share. A contribution is reviewed before use; sending it confers no authorship or editorial rights, and sponsorship never buys a finding.
Bring a method, a dataset or a question.
Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.
Legal documents.
Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.