GCRI · هوش مصنوعی و سامانه‌های خودمختار
روش‌ها و عدم قطعیت
The methods Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous سامانه‌ها relies on: their equations and assumptions, the data they need, how they are validated and the limits of what they can show.
ترتیبی که رویدادها در آن رخ می‌دهند.
- 01پیش‌نویسsources cited, labels attached
- 02Evidence checkevery value traced
- 03Independent reviewconflicts declared
- 04ویراستpublished with its limits
- 05اصلاحیهa new version, never a silent edit
The methods in use.
- 01هوش مصنوعی و یادگیری ماشینDistribution shift analysis · Fine-tuning for a specific use · Interpretability methodsApplied here
- 02مهندسی ارزیابی و اطمینان‌بخشی هوش مصنوعیAssurance cases for AI systems · Structured red teaming · Post-deployment monitoringApplied here
- 03محاسبات با عملکرد بالا، ابری و لبه‌ایCompute access for public research · Energy measurement of workloadsApplied here
- 04احتمال و آمارUncertainty on benchmark scores · Calibration assessment · Audit samplingApplied here
- 05امنیت سایبری و رمزنگاریThreat modelling AI applications · Model supply chain integrity · Injection defence testingApplied here
- 06علوم اجتماعی و رفتاریHuman oversight studies · Affected community research · Workplace adoption studiesApplied here
- 07رباتیک و خودکارسازیScenario-based testing · Collaborative robot safety · Operating domain monitoringApplied here
Each method, its role in this field and how it is checked.
- Ai MLRole hereArtificial intelligence and machine learning is the technology this platform stewards for the network.Checks appliedHeld-out evaluation; Dataset documentation; Drift monitoring
- Ai assuranceRole hereAI evaluation and assurance engineering is the second method this platform stewards.Checks appliedIndependent review; Evidence currency; Coverage reporting
- ComputingRole hereHigh-performance and cloud computing supply the capacity AI needs.Checks appliedMeasurement boundaries; Reproducible configuration; Provider data verification
- Probability statisticsRole hereProbability and statistics make AI evaluation trustworthy: confidence intervals on scores, significance of differences between models, calibration of predicted probabilities and sampling designs for audits.Checks appliedInterval reporting; Multiple comparisons; Sample size planning
- امنیت سایبریRole hereCybersecurity and cryptography protect AI systems and the data they use.Checks appliedThreat model review; Provenance verification; Regression testing
- علوم اجتماعیRole hereSocial and behavioural science studies how people use, trust and are affected by AI.Checks appliedEthics review; Pre-registration; Representative sampling
- رباتیکRole hereRobotics and automation bring AI into physical systems.Checks appliedScenario coverage; Simulation validity; Standards conformity
نحوهٔ اجرای فرایند.
Process explorer · Process
Methods and uncertainty: PRISMA 2020 review reporting
10 steps·4 مرحله
فرایند
Methods and uncertainty: PRISMA 2020 review reporting
PRISMA 2020 is a reporting guideline for systematic reviews; the steps follow its checklist, not a mandated sequence, and no Nexus document adopts it.
01 Plan
- 01Registration and protocolRecord · The review teamThe guideline asks for registration details, access to the protocol and any amendments.
- 02Eligibility criteriaRecord · The review teamThe guideline asks for the inclusion and exclusion criteria and how studies were grouped.
02 Find and select
- 03Search: sources and strategiesStep · The review teamThe guideline asks for the information sources and the full search strategies. It does not fix which sources are used.
- 04Selection of studiesStep · The review teamThe guideline asks how studies were judged eligible, including how many reviewers screened. It does not fix the number of reviewers.
- 05Flow diagramسابقهThe flow diagram shows the number of records found, the number of studies included and the reasons for exclusion.
03 Analyse
- 06Data collectionStep · The review teamThe guideline asks how data were collected from reports and which data items were sought.
- 07Risk of biasStep · The review teamThe guideline asks for the methods and tools used to assess risk of bias.
- 08SynthesisModel · The review teamThe guideline asks for the effect measures and the synthesis methods. It does not prescribe meta-analysis.
- 09Certainty of evidenceStep · The review teamThe guideline asks for the methods used to assess certainty, and reports the result per outcome. It does not name a grading scale.
04 Report
- 10Review reportسابقهThe guideline helps authors report why the review was done, what they did and what they found.
گزارش‌هاOutline of an externally published reporting guideline, not a Nexus process and not a record of operation. PRISMA 2020 mainly covers reviews of intervention effects. No Nexus page names it. Every programme is at service level R0.
Where uncertainty in AI analysis comes from, and how it is shown.
| منبع | Why it matters here | How it is reported |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark validity | Benchmarks saturate and leak into training data | Several evaluations, held-out tests, dates stated |
| Capability elicitation | Measured capability depends on prompting and tools | Elicitation effort described |
| Deployment context | Risk depends on use, not only the model | Use-specific assessment |
| Incident data | Reporting is voluntary and uneven | Incident sources and coverage stated |
Evaluation results carry the model version, date and setup; AI capability changes quickly and old results expire.
How uncertainty is reported.
- 01
State assumptions
Each analysis lists its assumptions and the data it depends on.
- 02
Quantify where possible
Ranges and confidence are reported alongside central estimates.
- 03
Validate and compare
Models are checked against observations and, where possible, against other models.
- 04
Publish limits
What an analysis cannot show is stated beside what it can.
Where this page’s references lead.
نهادها و اسنادی که این صفحه بر پایهٔ آن‌ها خوانده می‌شود. وضعیت و ویراست‌ها تغییر می‌کنند؛ هر پیوند به نهاد صادرکننده می‌رود.
پرسش و پاسخ.
Are the methods open?
شواهد را از همین صفحه ارسال کنید.
Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- ایمیلدرگاه GW-GCRIاز همین صفحه ارسال کنیدشواهد، یک اصلاحیه، یک مورد، یک روش، یک داوری، یک ترجمه یا ورودی نمایه. با برچسب این صفحه میرسد تا ویراستار مسئول آن را دریافت کند.
- Zenodoسپردهٔ بازآن را واگذار کنید و به جامعه ارائه دهیدسابقهٔ خود را با شناسهٔ ORCID خود در Zenodo منتشر کنید و سپس آن را در همانجا به جامعهٔ Reports ارسال کنید. گزینشگران آن را داوری می‌کنند؛ DOI از آنِ شما میماند.
- گزارش‌هاGCRIهمهٔ راههای مشارکت را ببینیدانواع مشارکت، نحوهٔ بررسی هر یک، اعتباری که دریافت میکنید، مجوز و آنچه هرگز پذیرفته نمیشود.
هرگز داده شخصی، جزئیات حساس زیرساخت یا چیزی را که حق اشتراکش را ندارید نفرستید. هر مشارکت پیش از استفاده داوری می‌شود؛ ارسال آن حق مؤلفی یا ویرایشی نمی‌دهد و حمایت مالی هرگز یافته‌ای را نمی‌خرد.
یک روش، یک مجموعه‌داده یا یک پرسش بیاورید.
اطلاعات و درخواست‌ها امروز باز است. هر درخواست یک شمارهٔ پیگیری می‌گیرد و گام بعدی را مشخص می‌کند؛ درخواست‌های عضویت، پرداخت‌ها، تخصیص رایانش و ثبت‌نام‌ها تنها زمانی باز می‌شوند که تیم، شرایط و ظرفیت داوری آن‌ها فراهم باشد.
اسناد حقوقی.
نقشه‌ها، داده‌ها و ارقام این سایت برای زمینه و اطلاعات عمومی نشان داده می‌شوند. توصیه، پیش‌بینی یا هشدار نیستند؛ حدود این اطلاعات در سلب مسئولیت‌ها و اعلامیه‌های داده بیان شده است.