GCRI · Zîrekiya çêkirî û pergalên xweser
Methods and uncertainty
The methods Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Pergal relies on: their equations and assumptions, the data they need, how they are validated and the limits of what they can show.
Rêza ku tişt tê de diqewimin.
- 01Pêşnûmesources cited, labels attached
- 02Evidence checkevery value traced
- 03Independent reviewconflicts declared
- 04Çappublished with its limits
- 05Rastkirina new version, never a silent edit
The methods in use.
- 01Zîrekiya çêkirî û fêrbûna makîneyêDistribution shift analysis · Fine-tuning for a specific use · Interpretability methodsApplied here
- 02Endezyariya nirxandin û teminata zîrekiya çêkirîAssurance cases for AI systems · Structured red teaming · Post-deployment monitoringApplied here
- 03Komputerkirina bi performansa bilind, ewr û kenarCompute access for public research · Energy measurement of workloadsApplied here
- 04Îhtîmal û statîstîkUncertainty on benchmark scores · Calibration assessment · Audit samplingApplied here
- 05Ewlehiya sîber û kriptografîThreat modelling AI applications · Model supply chain integrity · Injection defence testingApplied here
- 06Zanistên civakî û tevgerîHuman oversight studies · Affected community research · Workplace adoption studiesApplied here
- 07Robotîk û otomasyonScenario-based testing · Collaborative robot safety · Operating domain monitoringApplied here
Each method, its role in this field and how it is checked.
- Ai MLRole hereArtificial intelligence and machine learning is the technology this platform stewards for the network.Checks appliedHeld-out evaluation; Dataset documentation; Drift monitoring
- Ai assuranceRole hereAI evaluation and assurance engineering is the second method this platform stewards.Checks appliedIndependent review; Evidence currency; Coverage reporting
- ComputingRole hereHigh-performance and cloud computing supply the capacity AI needs.Checks appliedMeasurement boundaries; Reproducible configuration; Provider data verification
- Probability statisticsRole hereProbability and statistics make AI evaluation trustworthy: confidence intervals on scores, significance of differences between models, calibration of predicted probabilities and sampling designs for audits.Checks appliedInterval reporting; Multiple comparisons; Sample size planning
- Ewlehiya sîberRole hereCybersecurity and cryptography protect AI systems and the data they use.Checks appliedThreat model review; Provenance verification; Regression testing
- Zanista civakîRole hereSocial and behavioural science studies how people use, trust and are affected by AI.Checks appliedEthics review; Pre-registration; Representative sampling
- RobotîkRole hereRobotics and automation bring AI into physical systems.Checks appliedScenario coverage; Simulation validity; Standards conformity
Pêvajo çawa dimeşe.
Process explorer · Process
Methods and uncertainty: PRISMA 2020 review reporting
10 steps·4 qonax
Pêvajo
Methods and uncertainty: PRISMA 2020 review reporting
PRISMA 2020 is a reporting guideline for systematic reviews; the steps follow its checklist, not a mandated sequence, and no Nexus document adopts it.
01 Plan
- 01Registration and protocolRecord · The review teamThe guideline asks for registration details, access to the protocol and any amendments.
- 02Eligibility criteriaRecord · The review teamThe guideline asks for the inclusion and exclusion criteria and how studies were grouped.
02 Find and select
- 03Search: sources and strategiesStep · The review teamThe guideline asks for the information sources and the full search strategies. It does not fix which sources are used.
- 04Selection of studiesStep · The review teamThe guideline asks how studies were judged eligible, including how many reviewers screened. It does not fix the number of reviewers.
- 05Flow diagramTomarThe flow diagram shows the number of records found, the number of studies included and the reasons for exclusion.
03 Analyse
- 06Data collectionStep · The review teamThe guideline asks how data were collected from reports and which data items were sought.
- 07Risk of biasStep · The review teamThe guideline asks for the methods and tools used to assess risk of bias.
- 08SynthesisModel · The review teamThe guideline asks for the effect measures and the synthesis methods. It does not prescribe meta-analysis.
- 09Certainty of evidenceStep · The review teamThe guideline asks for the methods used to assess certainty, and reports the result per outcome. It does not name a grading scale.
04 Report
- 10Review reportTomarThe guideline helps authors report why the review was done, what they did and what they found.
rêzeya Pergalên StratejîkOutline of an externally published reporting guideline, not a Nexus process and not a record of operation. PRISMA 2020 mainly covers reviews of intervention effects. No Nexus page names it. Every programme is at service level R0.
Where uncertainty in AI analysis comes from, and how it is shown.
| Çavkanî | Why it matters here | How it is reported |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark validity | Benchmarks saturate and leak into training data | Several evaluations, held-out tests, dates stated |
| Capability elicitation | Measured capability depends on prompting and tools | Elicitation effort described |
| Deployment context | Risk depends on use, not only the model | Use-specific assessment |
| Incident data | Reporting is voluntary and uneven | Incident sources and coverage stated |
Evaluation results carry the model version, date and setup; AI capability changes quickly and old results expire.
How uncertainty is reported.
- 01
State assumptions
Each analysis lists its assumptions and the data it depends on.
- 02
Quantify where possible
Ranges and confidence are reported alongside central estimates.
- 03
Validate and compare
Models are checked against observations and, where possible, against other models.
- 04
Publish limits
What an analysis cannot show is stated beside what it can.
Where this page’s references lead.
Sazî û belgeyên ku ev rûpel li hember wan tê xwendin. Rewş û çap diguherin; her girêdan diçe ba saziya derxistinê.
Pirs û bersiv.
Are the methods open?
Ji vê rûpelê delîl bidin.
Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- E-nameDergeh GW-GCRIJi vê rûpelê bişîninDelîl, rastkirin, doz, rêbaz, nirxandin, wergerandin an têketina profîlê. Bi nîşana vê rûpelê digihîje, ji ber vê yekê edîtorê xwediyê wê wê bistîne.
- ZenodoDepoya vekirîWê razînin û ji civakê re bişîninTomara xwe li Zenodo bi ORCID iD ya xwe biweşînin, paşê wê li wir ji civaka Reports re bişînin. Kurator wê vedikolin; DOI ya we dimîne.
- rêzeya Pergalên StratejîkGCRIHemû rêyên beşdariyê bibîneCureyên beşdariyê, her yek çawa tê nirxandin, tu çi navlêkirinê distînî, lîsans û tiştê ku qet nayê qebûlkirin.
Tu carî daneyên şexsî, hûrgiliyên binesaza hesas an tiştekî ku mafê we yê parvekirinê tune ne neşînin. Beşdarî berî bikaranînê tê nirxandin; şandina wê nivîskarî an mafên edîtorî nade û sponsorî tu carî encamekê nakire.
Rêbazek, danehevek an pirsek bîne.
Agahî û pirs îro vekirî ne. Pirsek referansekê distîne û gava piştî wê dide nasîn; serlêdan, drav, veqetandina hesabkirinê û tomarkirin tenê dema ku tîm, mercên wê û kapasîteya vekolînê hebin vedibin.
Belgeyên hiqûqî.
Nexşe, dane û jimarên vê malperê ji bo çarçoveyê û agahiyên giştî têne nîşandan. Ew ne şîret, ne pêşbînî û ne hişyarî ne; sînorên agahiyê di Daxuyaniyên Berpirsiyariyê û Daxuyaniyên Daneyê de hatine diyarkirin.