Causal inference and impact evaluation ask whether a policy or programme changed outcomes compared with what would otherwise have happened. In this field they evaluate development programmes, place-based policies and reforms, stating the assumptions behind each estimate.
What causal inference and impact evaluation does here.
Causal inference and impact evaluation develop methods to determine whether and how interventions or exposures cause outcomes. They separate genuine effects from correlation. In economic development and development finance, causal inference shows which risk reduction measures actually work. It supports allocating resources toward interventions with demonstrated effect across connected risks. The canonical description is on the STEM Commons.
Randomised evaluations
Programmes such as cash transfers or business training are evaluated by randomly assigning participation and comparing outcomes, with pre-registered analysis plans.
Evaluating place-based policies
Difference-in-differences and synthetic control methods compare regions that received investment with similar regions that did not.
Regression discontinuity
Programmes with eligibility thresholds are evaluated by comparing those just above and below the cutoff.
03Monitor
Impact evaluation.
The screen a team would use to follow this method: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.
Impact evaluation
Economic development · Impact evaluation · Run R-3759
Parallel trends holdGCRI · Economic Development
Event study
Method card
Method
Causal inference and impact evaluation
Design
difference in differences
Units
103
Label
MODELLED
Robustness checks
Main specification
0.16
Yes
Drop early adopters
0.19
Yes
Synthetic control
0.03
Yes
Impact evaluation: the screen's structure, terms and states for Economic development.Example names and illustrative values; a design, not a record or a live system.
04Data
What the method consumes.
Datasets and records used by causal inference and impact evaluation on this platform, with the role each plays and the label its values carry. Sources are listed in the source register.
Data
Role
Label
Programme administrative data
Treatment and outcomes
Published statistics
Household and firm surveys
Outcomes
REPORTED
Regional statistics
Comparison units
Published statistics
05Methods and evidence
How impact evaluation is modelled, measured and tested.
The model, its assumptions, its data and its uncertainty, in the form a scientist or engineer would check. Structures follow published methods. The values drawn are illustrative, not findings.
Sensitivity analysis
Which inputs move the result for impact evaluation most, one at a time across their stated ranges.
Illustrative one-at-a-time sensitivity; a full analysis adds variance-based (Sobol) indices. Not results.
FAIR guiding principles · GO FAIR and FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web ConsortiumGuidance on consistent treatment of uncertainties · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
06Validation
How results are checked.
Identification assumptions are probed through placebo tests, falsification checks and sensitivity analysis. Replication across settings tests external validity.
Check
How it is done
Balance and pre-trends
Treatment and comparison groups are checked for balance and parallel pre-trends
Pre-registration
Analysis plans are registered before outcomes are seen
External validity
Results are compared across contexts before generalising
Unobserved confounding and spillovers can bias estimates. Effects found in one context may not transfer to another.
07Process
How the process runs.
Process explorer · Process
Impact evaluation: PRISMA 2020 review reporting
10 steps·4 stages
Process
Impact evaluation: PRISMA 2020 review reporting
PRISMA 2020 is a reporting guideline for systematic reviews; the steps follow its checklist, not a mandated sequence, and no Nexus document adopts it.
01 Plan
01Registration and protocolRecord · The review teamThe guideline asks for registration details, access to the protocol and any amendments.
02Eligibility criteriaRecord · The review teamThe guideline asks for the inclusion and exclusion criteria and how studies were grouped.
02 Find and select
03Search: sources and strategiesStep · The review teamThe guideline asks for the information sources and the full search strategies. It does not fix which sources are used.
04Selection of studiesStep · The review teamThe guideline asks how studies were judged eligible, including how many reviewers screened. It does not fix the number of reviewers.
05Flow diagramRecordThe flow diagram shows the number of records found, the number of studies included and the reasons for exclusion.
03 Analyse
06Data collectionStep · The review teamThe guideline asks how data were collected from reports and which data items were sought.
07Risk of biasStep · The review teamThe guideline asks for the methods and tools used to assess risk of bias.
08SynthesisModel · The review teamThe guideline asks for the effect measures and the synthesis methods. It does not prescribe meta-analysis.
09Certainty of evidenceStep · The review teamThe guideline asks for the methods used to assess certainty, and reports the result per outcome. It does not name a grading scale.
04 Report
10Review reportRecordThe guideline helps authors report why the review was done, what they did and what they found.
ReportsOutline of an externally published reporting guideline, not a Nexus process and not a record of operation. PRISMA 2020 mainly covers reviews of intervention effects. No Nexus page names it. Every programme is at service level R0.
What are the limits of causal inference and impact evaluation in this field?
Unobserved confounding and spillovers can bias estimates. Effects found in one context may not transfer to another.
How are results checked?
Identification assumptions are probed through placebo tests, falsification checks and sensitivity analysis. Replication across settings tests external validity.
Are the values on this page real?
The data names, roles and checks are real descriptions of practice. The canvas shows a design of the method's use, not a run; no result is reported here.
Reports is the Consortium's quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
GCRIEconomic DevelopmentCountry Systems Risk and ResilienceGlobal Systems Risk and Resilience
Never send personal data, sensitive infrastructure detail or anything you have no right to share. A contribution is reviewed before use; sending it confers no authorship or editorial rights, and sponsorship never buys a finding.
Economic Development
Bring a method, a dataset or a question.
Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.
Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.
Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.
This site uses only strictly necessary cookies to work and to remember your privacy choices. Nothing loads from other companies, and we never sell or share your personal information.
Details
This site uses only strictly necessary cookies to work and to remember your privacy choices. Nothing loads from other companies, and we never sell or share your personal information. We run no advertising. You can review your choices at any time through Privacy choices at the foot of every page.