GCRI · Food Nexus

Subject groups

Moderated groups where specialists discuss questions in Food Nexus. Each group is listed here when its moderation, terms and hosting are in place, with its scope and how to join.

01Workspace

The workspace for subject groups.

Community workspace

Food · Subject groups · Example interface, not a record

3 requests to reviewGCRI · Food Nexus

Working groups

Crop monitoring WG2310Week 18Active
Early action WG359Week 29Chair needed
Nutrition WG71Week 11Active
Trade and reserves WG84Week 25Active
Market analysis WG321Week 37Chair needed

Join requests

  1. J-1Hydrologist, early careerCrop monitoring WG8 d
  2. J-2Utility engineerEarly action WG4 d
  3. J-3Conflict of interest to declareNutrition WG9 d

Contributions

Proposed01
Market monitoring networkcredit: named
In review01
Harvest assessment, maintwo reviewers
Accepted01
Market and harvest bulletincredited on record
Community workspace.Illustrative interface; not live data.

Food Nexus · Community workspace. Community workspace: example names and illustrative values, not a record.

02How it works

Subject groups in Food Nexus.

  • Each entry shows its scope, host or owner, and terms.
  • Participation follows published rules, applied equally.
  • Taking part gives no authority or influence over findings.
03Group themes

Subjects where food system specialists most need a shared forum.

Food questions split along the chain: agronomists and modellers argue about yields, market analysts about price transmission, nutritionists about outcomes. Groups are organised so that each meets the next link, because the misunderstandings that matter happen between them, for example a yield outlook read as a price forecast.

  • Crop monitoring and outlooks.
  • Food price transmission and market policy.
  • Post-harvest loss and cold chains.
  • Nutrition outcomes in shocks.
04Process

How the process runs.

Process

Subject groups: Working group, charter to sunset

A working group is chartered by record for a fixed timebox, delivers bounded assignments, drafts and recommends, then dissolves unless renewed; it does not adopt.

  1. 01 Form

    1. 01NLC proposes the groupDecision · National Leadership CouncilThe NLC proposes working groups and nominates chairs, editors and experts from its leadership pools. It does not charter.
    2. 02Charter by recordDecision · National Standards CouncilA working group is chartered by record for a timebox of at most twenty-four months. The charter sets its scope, roles and decision rule.
    3. 03Members join by competenceStep · MembersExperts, practitioners, students and volunteers join by competence. Members declare interests and recuse on conflict.
  2. 02 Work

    1. 04Workplan from the national agendaStepAssignments come from the national agenda and the year’s missions. Each states the competence it needs and how the work will be reviewed.
    2. 05Drafts and deliverables, delivered monthlyRecordGroups deliver monthly. For standards they draft the national profile and deviation register and run national public comment and pilots.
  3. 03 Review

    1. 06Contribution record and reviewGateEach contribution is recorded and reviewed. A working group drafts and recommends; it does not adopt.
    2. 07Recognition follows the recordRecordContribution records are kept, so that recognition follows the record.
    3. 08National adoption is decided elsewhereDecision · National Standards CouncilThe National Standards Council decides the adoption mode and the national profile. The working group proposes and never decides.
  4. 04 Close

    1. 09Dissolved by default, or renewed by recordDecision · National Standards CouncilA group is dissolved by default at the end of the timebox. The National Standards Council renews or closes it, on the NLC’s proposal.

National Working Groups · National Standards Council · Decision rightsDesigned programme process, not a record of operation. No cycle has run and every programme is at service level R0. A gate is a programme decision, never a public-authority approval, certification or deployment authorisation. No working group is constituted. The charter rules belong to the proposed Nexus Standards working model.

05Next step

Register your interest.

Write to the contact form. The acknowledgement gives a reference and names the next step.

06Sources

Where this page’s references lead.

The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.

07Questions

Questions and answers.

When are entries added?
When their hosting, terms and moderation are confirmed.
Food Nexus

Bring a method, a dataset or a question.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.