Skip to content

GCRI · Food Nexus

تەکنەلۆجیای کشتوکاڵ و داهێنان

Innovation shapes how food سیستەمە adapt: new crop varieties, precision application of water and inputs, digital advisory and market services, biological inputs and new protein sources. Each can raise productivity or resilience, and each raises questions of safety, access, data rights, market concentration and dependence on supply chains for seed, chips and connectivity. This page sets out how agricultural innovation is evaluated, which safeguards govern it, and who decides whether and how it is used.

02The question

Agritech and innovation: how the risk develops.

Precision agriculture, biotechnology and technology safeguards. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

میکانیزم

Adoption decides impact

A technology changes outcomes only where farmers can afford, reach and trust it. Credit, extension, connectivity, tenure and risk all filter adoption, so gains in the laboratory rarely carry over in full to the field.

میکانیزم

Breeding races a moving target

New varieties take years to develop and release while pests, pathogens and climates shift. Seed سیستەمە that replace varieties slowly leave farmers growing cultivars bred for conditions that no longer hold.

میکانیزم

Uniformity concentrates risk

Widely grown single varieties, a few input suppliers or one dominant digital platform create common points of failure. A new pathogen race, a supplier outage or a data breach can affect many farms at once.

میکانیزم

Safeguards shape trust and trade

Biosafety assessment, residue limits, data governance and intellectual property rules decide what may be grown, sold and exported. Divergent national rules can block trade in products approved elsewhere.

03چاودێری

Crop and harvest monitor.

The screen a team would use to follow this subject: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.

Crop and harvest monitor

Agritech and innovation · Main season · Crop stage: grain fill

Assessment in fieldGCRI · Food Nexus

Crop calendar

  1. Land preparationdone
  2. Plantingdone
  3. Emergencedone
  4. Vegetativedone
  5. Grain fillnow
  6. Harvestnext
  7. Post-harvest

Vegetation index, season to date

Yield outlook by zone

Highland zone2.0▼ 5ناوەند
Coastal plain2.6▲ 4ناوەند
Region North1.2▼ 21کەم
Region South1.9▼ 14ناوەند

Field assessment plots

red: crop stress observed

Plot markers · example positionsN
Crop and harvest monitor: the screen's structure, terms and states for Agritech and innovation.ناو و بەهای نموونەیی؛ دیزاینێکە، نەک تۆمار یان سیستەمی ڕاستەوخۆ.
04Couplings

Agricultural technology changes exposure in other domains too.

بوارHow it couples hereWhat to watch
ئاوPrecision irrigation can save water per hectare yet expand irrigated area, so basin use may rise.Basin abstraction before and after adoption
وزەAutomation and digital services add electricity and connectivity dependence on farms.Farm dependence on grid and network services
تەندروستیNew crop varieties and biological products need biosafety assessment under the Cartagena Protocol.Biosafety decisions recorded in the Biosafety Clearing-House
فرەجۆریی زیندەوەریUniform varieties narrow genetic diversity; gene banks under the Plant Treaty conserve it. See nature data and rights.Varietal diversity in farmers' fields

FAO's State of Food and Agriculture 2022 examined automation and found adoption highly uneven, with benefits depending on scale, skills and connectivity; smallholders face the highest barriers.

05ڕێگا و بەڵگە

How agritech and innovation is modelled, measured and tested.

مۆدێلەکە، گریمانەکانی، داتاکانی و نادڵنیاییەکەی، بەو شێوەیەی زانا یان ئەندازیارێک دەیپشکنێت. پێکهاتەکان ڕێگا بڵاوکراوەکان دەگرنەبەر. بەهاکانی کێشراو نموونەییە، نەک دۆزینەوە.

مۆدێلی سیستەم

The couplings between the systems in agritech and innovation: signs of influence, a reinforcing and a balancing loop, and cross-links where stress jumps.

++−++خۆراکبازرگانیکەشوهەواکۆمەڵگە خۆجێییەکانئابووریR بەهێزکەرB هاوسەنگ
هێڵکاری خولگەی هۆکاری لە سیستەمەکانی لاپەڕەکەوە؛ نیشانەکان ئاڕاستەی کاریگەری پیشان دەدەن. پێکهاتەیەکی نموونەییە بۆ مۆدێلی دینامیکی سیستەم یان تۆڕ، نەک پەیوەندی مەزەندەکراو.
پرەنسیپە ڕێنماییەکانی FAIR · GO FAIR و FORCE11W3C PROV · World Wide Web Consortiumڕێنمایی بۆ مامەڵەی یەکسان لەگەڵ نادڵنیاییەکان · IPCCCEOS Analysis Ready Data · Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
06Reports، ستاندارد و بەشدارییەکان

Assessing agritech, and where results go.

Technology assessments in agriculture are designed for the زنجیرەی Exponential Technology and, where tested in controlled trials, the Labs Evidence series. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) recommends no product; it publishes what was tested and found. Trial designs and results, including failures, are the most useful contributions.

07نیشاندەرەکان

What is measured, and how well.

Each indicator carries its unit, its cadence, the kind of source behind it and the evidence label a value would carry. No values are shown: a programme supplies them under its own authority.

IndicatorUnitCadenceSource typeناونیشان
Area under improved varietieshectares by variety and release yearseasonalAdoption surveys, DNA fingerprintingمەزەندەکراو
Varietal turnoverarea-weighted average age of varieties, yearsper surveyAdoption surveysمەزەندەکراو
Public agricultural research spendingshare of agricultural GDPannualAgricultural Science and Technology Indicatorsئامارە بڵاوکراوەکان
Approvals of biotech crops and traitscount by country, crop and traitannualRegulatory databasesئامارە بڵاوکراوەکان
Plant genetic resources in medium or long-term conservation (SDG 2.5.1)number of accessionsannualGenebank reportingئامارە بڵاوکراوەکان
Farm households using digital advisory or market servicespercent of farm householdsper surveyAgricultural and household surveysREPORTED
Area under precision managementhectares under variable-rate or sensor-guided applicationannualIndustry and survey dataREPORTED
08سەرچاوەکان

Where the evidence comes from.

Named public datasets and institutional records, each with its licence class. Sources by agreement are used only under their terms and never republished.

سەرچاوەWhat it givesLicence class
Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (IFPRI)Public agricultural research spending and staffing by countryFree and open, attribution
FAO WIEWSConservation and use of plant genetic resources by countryFree, attribution
Genesys (Crop Trust)Passport data on genebank accessions worldwideFree and open, attribution
Biosafety Clearing-House (Cartagena Protocol)National decisions, risk assessments and laws on living modified organismsPublic records
CGIAR GARDIAN and centre data repositoriesTrial, breeding and adoption datasets from CGIAR centresMostly free and open, terms per dataset
WIPO PATENTSCOPE and UPOV PLUTOPatent and plant variety protection recordsFree, terms per database
09بڕیارەکان

Who decides, and what the evidence serves.

Food Nexus prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

کێ بڕیار دەداتThe questionEvidence this page serves
National agricultural research سیستەمە and seed regulatorsWhich varieties to release, and how to speed their replacement in farmers' fieldsMulti-site trial results, adoption surveys and variety age by region
Biosafety authorities and food safety regulatorsWhether a new organism, product or input is safe to release or sell, and under what conditionsRisk assessments under the Cartagena Protocol and Codex guidance, with data gaps stated
Agriculture ministries and development banksWhich innovations to support with extension, credit or subsidy, and for whomAdoption constraints, impact evaluations and distributional effects by farm type
Data protection and competition authoritiesHow farm data are owned, shared and protected, and whether input and platform markets stay contestableMarket concentration and data governance evidence

Outputs this topic produces

  • Innovation and adoption maps by crop, region and farm type
  • Dependency maps for seed, input and digital service supply
  • Evaluation designs for new technologies with field conditions stated
  • Comparisons of national biosafety and farm data rules
10Core questions

What experts ask.

Innovation is often presented as the answer to food-system risk, and sometimes it is. But a technology that works on a research station may not work on a smallholding, and a tool that concentrates data or seed supply in a few hands can create new single points of failure. Experts ask for evidence of benefit under real conditions and look at who carries the new risks.

  • Which technologies have shown benefits under real farm conditions, for which producers and at what cost?
  • How do digital agriculture tools handle data ownership, consent and dependence on a few providers?
  • What biosafety and biosecurity questions do new breeding and biological technologies raise, and how are they assessed?
  • Who is left out when technologies need capital, connectivity or skills that many producers lack?
11Mechanisms

Drivers and processes.

Innovation changes both the benefits and the risk profile of food production.

Precision

Data-driven management

Variable-rate inputs, sensors and remote sensing target water and nutrients more precisely, but depend on connectivity and accurate calibration.

Biology

Breeding and biologicals

Drought-tolerant and disease-resistant varieties and biological pest control can reduce losses. Their assessment draws on biotechnology platforms.

سیستەم

Dependency and access

Proprietary platforms, seed سیستەمە and digital services can concentrate control and leave producers exposed if a provider fails.

12Methods and data

How the evidence is built, and its limits.

  1. 01

    Field trials

    Controlled trials show agronomic performance; results from research stations may overstate on-farm gains.

  2. 02

    Adoption studies

    Surveys and impact evaluations show who adopts and benefits. Selection effects make causal claims hard.

  3. 03

    هەڵسەنگاندنی مەترسی

    Biosafety and environmental assessments follow national regulatory procedures, which differ between jurisdictions.

  4. 04

    Technology foresight

    Scenarios explore how technologies might spread and interact. They are explorations, not predictions.

14Where this page's references

ئەو شوێنانەی سەرچاوەکانی ئەم لاپەڕەیە بۆیان دەبەن.

ئەو لەش و بەڵگەنامانەی ئەم لاپەڕەیەیان لەگەڵ دەخوێنرێتەوە. دۆخ و وەشانەکان دەگۆڕێن؛ هەر بەستەرێک دەچێتە لای لەشی دەرکەر.

15پرسیارەکان

پرسیار و وەڵام.

Is precision agriculture only for large farms?
No, but its benefits depend on scale, connectivity and finance. Mobile advisory, low-cost sensors and shared services bring parts of it to smallholders, with evidence of impact that varies widely by setting.
How are genetically modified crops regulated?
National biosafety authorities assess food, feed and environmental safety, guided by the Cartagena Protocol and Codex principles for foods derived from modern biotechnology. Approval and labelling rules differ between countries, and gene-edited products are treated differently across jurisdictions.
Why does genetic diversity matter for food security?
Diverse crops and varieties spread risk and hold the traits breeders need for new pests and climates. Genebanks and farmers' own seed systems both conserve that diversity, under the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.
Does Food Nexus endorse technologies or products?
No. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) does not certify, approve or endorse products. It publishes evidence on performance, risks and access.
Are gene-edited crops in scope?
Yes, as a subject of evidence. Regulatory decisions belong to national authorities.
How are farm data protected in platform research?
Data are used only with documented rights and consent, and published results are aggregated so that individual farms cannot be identified.
Can technology replace good soil and water management?
No. Most technologies work by improving management decisions or crop traits; they depend on healthy soils, adequate water and functioning markets to deliver benefits.
Reportsبەشداربە

لەم لاپەڕەیەوە بەڵگە پێشکەش بکە.

Reports is the Consortium's quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRIFood Nexusمەترسی و خۆڕاگریی کەرتی جیهانیمەترسی و خۆڕاگریی سیستەمی وڵاتکورتەی بەڵگە
Food Nexus

ڕێگایەک، کۆمەڵە داتایەک یان پرسیارێک بهێنە.

زانیاری و پرسیار ئەمڕۆ کراوەن. پرسیارێک ژمارەی ئاماژەی پێدەدرێت و هەنگاوی دواتر دیاری دەکات؛ داواکاری، پارەدان، تەرخانکردنی کۆمپیوتەر و تۆمارکردن تەنیا کاتێک دەکرێنەوە کە تیم، مەرج و توانای پێداچوونەوەیان هەبێت.