Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

Methodology

How the edition was made: methods, the model card, the evidence cut and its age, the acceptance record and the glossary.

12 min read0 figures13 tables10 notesNR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. ·Executive summary
  3. 1Trade moves through a few narrow places
  4. 2Key findings
  5. 3Systems and sectors at baseline
  6. 4Risks and capability
  7. 5A chokepoint closure that overlaps a Red Sea diversion and high freight rates
  8. 6Readings from the other desks
  9. 7The 2027 agenda
  10. 8Systems in depth
  11. AMethodology
    1. A.1 Methods
    2. A.2 Model card, Supply Chains and Chokepoints Model v0
    3. A.3 The baseline evidence cut
    4. A.4 Evidence age and coverage
    5. A.5 Evidence cards, two anchor sources
    6. A.6 Publication acceptance record
    7. A.7 Status words
    8. A.8 How the edition is made, released and corrected
    9. A.9 Glossary and abbreviations
    10. A.10 Technical annex
  12. BData appendix
  13. CReferences and record
  14. ·Complete edition, for print

A.1Methods

The global baseline uses published values and four simple derivations. Each is shown in full so that any reader can reproduce it.

Table A.1Methods
No.DerivationCalculationResult
(1)Average seaborne haul in 2024, derived from ton-miles and tons66,781 billion ton-miles ÷ 12,720 million tons≈ 5,250 miles
(2)Share of February 2026 Middle East crude oil production shut in, March to June 2026 average9.4 ÷ 25.2≈ 37%
(3)Fall in Hormuz daily transits, February to March 2026(130 − 6) ÷ 130≈ 95%
(4)Ratio of Shanghai to Los Angeles and Shanghai to Rotterdam container rates, 29 October 20267,514 ÷ 3,686≈ 2.0
Table A.2Coupling strength scale (matrix and model card)
StrengthDefinition
STRONGa disruption in the source system has historically changed the target system’s service or output within one season, in more than one region
MODERATEan effect is documented but buffered or slower
WEAKan effect is plausible but not documented at global scale
Table A.3Status grammar
LabelRule
Reportedvalue as issued by its source, with year
Inferredreasoned from cited evidence; never a measurement
EstimatedNexus analytical value with stated method
Scenarioconditional on stated assumptions
Expert inputstructured editorial judgement awaiting evidence

A.2Model card, Supply Chains and Chokepoints Model v0

Model ID
MDL-SR03-SUPPLYCHAINS · v0.1
Purpose
represent trade as a network with narrow places and the mechanisms by which disruptions spread between shipping lanes, energy, fertiliser, minerals and freight
Family
graph-based system of systems
Inputs
the cited sources of this edition; no proprietary data
Method
expert-specified coupling strengths (STRONG · MODERATE · WEAK) from assessments and analogue events
Validation
none yet, first validation against federation evidence in 2027
Uncertainty
qualitative; strengths are hypotheses, not measurements
Domain of validity
global scale; not for asset-, site- or country-level use
Reproducibility
strength table and sources published in this edition
20couplings

typed in v0

2strong

documented within one season

4moderate

documented, buffered

14weak

plausible, undocumented

A.3The baseline evidence cut

Every Nexus edition is published from a frozen evidence cut. The global baseline cut is documentary: it pins the exact edition of every source cited. Federation cuts begin with the first national Foundry cuts in 2027.

Cut ID
DC-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Type
baseline documentary cut
Resolution policy
pinned · as of 30 September 2026
Sources pinned
46 cited sources, each at the edition and access date in the references
Model runs
none at baseline, analytical values are stated with their method
Digest
computed at freeze and recorded in the publication record
Supersedes
nothing, first cut of the series
Superseded by
the 2027 supply chains and chokepoints annual cut

Lineage

  1. 01

    source edition

  2. 02

    pinned citation

  3. 03

    finding

  4. 04

    page

  5. 05

    publication record

Table A.4From the baseline cut to the federation cut
ElementBaseline 20262027 global annual
Sourcescited global publications, pinned by editionnational, regional and sector cuts through one graph
Analysisstated methods and editorial estimatestyped analysis specifications
ModelsSupply Chains and Chokepoints Model v0 specificationmodel runs with receipts
Findingstwelve baseline findingsfindings re-bound to federation evidence
Reviewfive passes scheduledfive passes on the exact digest

A.4Evidence age and coverage

A 2026 global edition rests on evidence observed in many different years. This page shows each time base, so that no single year label hides older evidence.

Table A.5Evidence age and coverage
IndicatorObservedReleasedCadenceNext release
Seaborne trade volume and ton-miles2024Sep 2025annualReview of Maritime Transport 2026
Canal shares of trade2023 to 20242024annualnext UNCTAD review
Chokepoint oil flows2024Mar 2026annualnext EIA update
Hormuz quarterly flows4Q25 to 2Q26Oct 2026monthly10 Nov 2026
Hormuz daily transitsFeb to Mar 2026Mar to Apr 2026per eventnot found after Q2 2026
Panama Canal trafficFY2025Oct 2025annualFY2026 results
WTO trade outlook2026Oct 2026twice a yearspring 2027
Container freight29 Oct 2026Oct 2026weeklyweekly
Fertiliser and food2026Apr 2026per eventnot found
Rare earth controls2025Nov 2025per event10 Nov 2026
Table A.6Coverage by system at baseline
SystemCoverageThinnest dimension
Seaborne volumeGOODport and inland legs
Canals and straitsPARTIALtransits after Q2 2026
Energy flowsGOODHormuz data reliability
Fertiliser and foodPARTIALimporter stocks
MineralsTHINprocessing outside the top refiner
Container freightPARTIALlong-run series
Trade policyPARTIALeffective tariffs on one basis
Air, rail and roadTHINnot covered
Table A.7Designed empty states: what is not bound, what would fill it and why
FieldSource that would fill itBlocker
Port-level and inland-leg throughput on a common basisport authorities, customs and national statistics officesnot published on a common basis; port data not retrieved
Strait of Hormuz transits and flows after the second quarter of 2026EIA, UNCTAD and vessel-tracking providers465tracking data unreliable since late February 2026; only the Drewry note of two transits in the week to 29 October was found
Effective tariff rates on one basis across major economiesnational tariff schedules and WTO tariff datathe Yale Budget Lab tracker could not be retrieved; no figure is used
Share of trade that passes through two or more chokepointscustoms and route datano consolidated series found
Inventory buffers held by firms and statesfirms, national statistics and strategic stock agenciesnot published on a common basis
Taiwan share of leading-edge chip manufacturingSIA and BCG supply chain study28report not opened; search summaries give 92 percent of sub-10 nm capacity and 69 percent of 2022 production, and the two are not reconciled
IEA critical minerals outlook figures from the report itselfIEA Global Critical Minerals Outlook 202626the report page returned an access error; figures come from a press article
USGS rare earth production by countryUSGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 202627the publication returned an access error
IMF PortWatch chokepoint seriesIMF PortWatch44the dashboard page returned no readable content
IMF Suez Canal revenue projection from the review itselfIMF fourth review18only a news report on the review was opened
Status of the rare earth control suspension after 10 November 2026Ministry of Commerce noticesthe date falls after evidence close; no extension notice found
Capability rungs beyond rerouting and canal recoverycarriers, ports, regulators, ministriesnot reviewed

A.5Evidence cards, two anchor sources

Issued by the UN Trade and Development body. Annual. Role: binds TRD-001 and INF-002. Coverage: global seaborne trade, 2024 with projections to 2030. The chapter text was read in full.

EVD-SR03-001

UNCTAD Review of Maritime Transport 2025, chapter I1

Issued by the World Trade Organization. Twice a year. Role: binds FIN-008. Coverage: global merchandise trade, 2025 growth and the 2026 baseline and high-energy-price case. The news release was read; the full report was not.

EVD-SR03-002

WTO Global Trade Outlook and Statistics, March 202613

Table A.8Quality dimensions at baseline
DimensionEVD-SR03-001EVD-SR03-002
Completenessvolume, ton-miles, containers, commoditiesmerchandise and services, regions and sectors
Timelinessabout 9 months after the yearabout 1 week after the data cut
Revisionannual; prior years restatedforecasts revised in March, October and in between
Method transparencysources named; data from commercial shipping databasesforecast method described by the issuer
External validationcompiled from industry and port datareview by the issuer’s statistics staff

Evidence cards to follow in 2027

  • UNCTAD1: chapters II to V on fleet, freight, ports and regulation
  • WTO13: full report tables on regional trade
  • EIA46: later monthly releases on Hormuz
  • Drewry16: weekly index history

A.6Publication acceptance record

Editorial self-check at evidence close. Every applicable item carries a disposition; the remaining items are review, approval and deposit.

Table A.9Publication acceptance record
GroupAreaItemsPassN/APending
D1Identity and scope8800
D2Source and data12912
D3Analysis and models12381
D4Findings and claims9801
D5Figures, tables, maps10622
D6Editorial and citations10802
D7Review and approval130013
D8Artefact and design12705
D9Registry and release9009

Publication gate

Conditions met
14 of 23 at evidence close
Blocking problems
none recorded
Open conditions
reviews, approval of the exact digest, deposit, registry pointer

Not applicable at baseline

Model runs
first runs in Q1 2027
Maps
plates in Q2 2027
Waivers
none

A.7Status words

Table A.10The status every value carries
StatusWhat it means
ObservedMeasured directly and published by the source.
ReportedPublished statistics of an official or institutional source.
DeclaredStated by the body concerned; not independently measured.
EstimatedA Nexus estimate from cited evidence, with its method in Annex A.
ModelledProduced by a stated model from cited inputs.
InferredReasoned from cited evidence; not measured.
ForecastA projection by the cited source.
SimulatedA simulation result under stated assumptions.
ScenarioA conditional statement under stated assumptions; never a prediction.
Expert inputExpert judgement, recorded with its basis.
CandidateProposed for a later edition; not yet evidence.
Evidence-quality levels (EQL 1 to 5) grade the source behind a value; they are not a score of the subject.

A.8How the edition is made, released and corrected

Every edition is built from a sealed evidence cut, reviewed under three keys, signed and deposited before any site shows it as published; corrections go to Nexus Standards as change proposals and feed the next cut.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Evidence arrives from the pillarsFoundry seals observations and indicator series, Universe hands over after-action and scenario findings, and contributions are screened at every gateway, including this site’s.
02 The cut is sealedOn the cut date the evidence is pinned under one identifier, so anyone can rebuild the edition from exactly what it was built on.
03 The edition is assembledThe edition is drafted from its template and content pack. Agents may draft; they never publish and never decide.
04 The keys turnAt the publisher of record the truth key comes first: every value is checked against its source or stated method before the meaning and capital keys turn. No edition moves on until every key has been turned by a named steward.
05 The gate opensA named approver releases one exact digest of the edition; any change after this point is a new version, never a silent edit.
06 Signed and depositedThe PDF, the web edition and the data bundle are signed together with a manifest and an RO-Crate description, and deposited on Zenodo with a concept and a version DOI.
07 Published on its desk’s siteOnly then does the edition show as published on its desk’s Reports site, and the Collection lists it as a part.
08 Corrections go to StandardsMethod and correction findings go to Nexus Standards as change proposals; citations, corrections and new contributions feed the next evidence cut.

A teaching model of the process, not a forecast and not a record of any run; dates and counts on this page come from the programme record. Sources: Reports governance at GCRI Canada (2026); Zenodo, repository of record for Reports deposits (2026).

Lifecycle, one state at a time: Draft, Computed, Evidence bound, Reviewed, Approved for release, Published, Corrected, Superseded. This edition is a draft.

A.9Glossary and abbreviations

Table A.11Series terms
TermMeaning
Baseline Editionthe inaugural annual edition that fixes the reference state for the series
WEFH+Bwater, energy, food, health and biodiversity, the national nexus core
Couplinga typed dependency through which one system transmits to another
Protection gapthe share of losses not covered by insurance
Capability ladderLISTED → EXISTS → ADEQUATE → TESTED → DEMONSTRATED
EQLevidence-quality level, 1–5
Evidence cuta frozen resolution of exact sources and versions
NNC · NLC · NWGNational Nexus Consortium · National Leadership Council · National Working Groups
Table A.12Abbreviations used in this edition
AbbreviationExpansion
AISautomatic identification system for vessels
EIAUS Energy Information Administration
FAOFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
IMFInternational Monetary Fund
IMOInternational Maritime Organization
LNGliquefied natural gas
MFNmost-favoured-nation
SCFIShanghai Containerized Freight Index
TEUtwenty-foot equivalent unit
UNCTADUnited Nations Trade and Development
WCIWorld Container Index
WTOWorld Trade Organization

A.10Technical annex

Table A.13Technical annex
ItemAnnexContentsStatus
A.1Indicator definitionsthe global indicator set, with units and sourcesIN THIS EDITION
A.2Coupling strengthsthe twenty-cell matrix and its rationaleIN THIS EDITION
A.3Scenario specificationSCN-SR03-CHK-01 assumptions and signpostsIN THIS EDITION
A.4Capability placementsrung evidence for fifteen functionsIN THIS EDITION
A.5Model diagnosticsfirst runs and validation2027
A.6Sensitivity analysesinfluence of coupling strengths2027
A.7Regional notesregional supply chain cardsWITH REGIONAL EDITIONS
A.8Review statementspass-by-pass review recordAT RELEASE

A.1 · indicator definition: chokepoint transit

Construct
a recorded passage of a vessel through a named strait or canal
Unit
vessels per day or per week
Method
vessel-tracking and canal-authority counts
Source
UNCTAD rapid assessment5; Drewry16
Uncertainty
counts differ by provider and by what is counted
Known limits
does not record cargo, flag or destination

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 46EIA (ed.), Short-Term Energy Outlook, September 2026, global oil markets (Brent averaged USD 91 a barrel in August 2026; Middle East crude oil production shut-ins from the Hormuz closure averaged 9.4 million barrels a day from March to June 2026 against February production of 25.2, and were 5.0 in July and 6.7 in August). US Energy Information Administration, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 5UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz disruption deepens global economic strain across trade, prices and finance (second rapid assessment; transits about 130 a day in February and 6 in March 2026; merchandise trade growth 1.5 to 2.5 percent projected for 2026). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: Semiconductor Industry Association and Boston Consulting Group, Strengthening the Global Semiconductor Supply Chain in an Uncertain Era, 2021, taken from search-result summaries that disagree on the Taiwan share; no figure is used in findings. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (July 2026), taken only from the press article cited as reference 23; the IEA page returned an access error. International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, rare earths chapter; the publication returned an access error and no figure is used. US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 44UNVERIFIED, not opened: IMF (ed.), PortWatch, chokepoint transit and trade monitoring platform; the dashboard page returned no readable content and no figure is used. International Monetary Fund, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 18IMF (ed.), fourth review of Egypt’s arrangement (Suez Canal revenue USD 6.6 billion in FY2023/24 and projected USD 3.6 billion in FY2024/25), as reported by Hellenic Shipping News from Arab Finance; the IMF report itself was not opened. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025, chapter I: International maritime trade (12,720 million tons and 66,781 billion ton-miles in 2024; Cape detour about 30 percent; cobalt and copper concentration). United Nations Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 13WTO (ed.), Global Trade Outlook and Statistics, news release of 19 March 2026 (2025 merchandise volume growth 4.6 percent; 2026 baseline 1.9 percent; high-energy-price case 1.4 percent; Hormuz traffic from 138 vessels a day to almost zero). World Trade Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 16POST-CLOSE, context only: Drewry (ed.), World Container Index (assessment of 29 October 2026; composite USD 4,429 per 40ft; Shanghai to Los Angeles USD 7,514; Shanghai to Rotterdam USD 3,686; two vessels transiting Hormuz and 62 vessels through Suez in the previous week). Drewry Shipping Consultants, London. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Cite this annex

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Annex A: Methodology. In Strategic Systems Report 2026: Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-STRATEGIC-SUPPLYCHAINS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskStrategic Systems

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.