Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

Systems in depth

One section per system: its state at evidence close, its exposures and what the operational series will watch.

9 min read0 figures5 tables21 notesNR-XTECH-MANUFACTURING-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. ·Executive summary
  3. 1Additive manufacturing is production infrastructure that is still being qualified
  4. 2Key findings
  5. 3Systems and sectors at baseline
  6. 4Risks and capability
  7. 5Defence demand outruns part acceptance and supply
  8. 6Readings from the other desks
  9. 7The 2027 agenda
  10. 8Systems in depth
    1. 8.1 Machines and process platforms
    2. 8.2 Energy, inert gas and process footprint
    3. 8.3 Feedstock, materials and supply chain
    4. 8.4 Economy, investment and workforce
    5. 8.5 Security, standards and governance watch
  11. AMethodology
  12. BData appendix
  13. CReferences and record
  14. ·Complete edition, for print

8.1Machines and process platforms

Additive machines span polymer and metal processes. Evidence is strongest where benchmark data and peer review exist, and weakest where claims rest on company announcements.

85submissions

AM-Bench 2025 challenge problems12

8metal sets

AM-Bench 2025 benchmark sets, plus 1 polymer12

30,000nozzle tips

printed by 2018 for one engine part6

Table 8.1State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Laser powder bed fusionbenchmark data and melt pool studies; monitoring has open gaps121516Reported
Polymer laser sinteringprocess energy estimated at 113.66 MJ/kg on one platform14Reported
Wire-arc depositiona vendor announced a production order for submarine parts9Reported
Process controlclosed-loop control shown in simulation only17Inferred

Couplings

  • INF ↔ FIN machines and revenue
  • INF → GOV part acceptance and defence use
  • MIN → INF powder

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • production claims on a common basis
  • yield and scrap by process

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-15 Science and Engineering Frontier
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • SR-03 Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints
  • XT-12 Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology
  • XT-03 Robotics and Autonomous Systems

8.2Energy, inert gas and process footprint

Metal machines run under inert gas or vacuum and use laser or electron beam energy. Energy and gas use per kilogram of part is not published on a common basis.

113.66MJ/kg

polymer laser sintering, one platform14

156.10MJ/kg

one low-cost heat sintering platform14

107 to 144MJ/kg

earlier polymer laser sintering studies cited in14

Table 8.2State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Polymer sintering energyone platform estimated; earlier studies in a similar range14Reported
Metal machine energynot bound on a common basis14Expert input
Inert gas usenot published14Expert input
Cooling waternot published14Expert input

Couplings

  • ENE ↔ INF facility power
  • WAT → INF cooling water
  • INF → CLI process footprint

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • metal machine energy and gas use
  • cooling-water use

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-15 Science and Engineering Frontier
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • SR-03 Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints
  • XT-12 Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology
  • XT-03 Robotics and Autonomous Systems

8.3Feedstock, materials and supply chain

Production use depends on powder, wire and resin qualified for each process and alloy. Volumes are not published, and supplier commentary is the main evidence.

250,000workers

Navy maritime industrial base need over a decade8

20parts

installed by the US Navy in a year7

0volumes bound

powder supply and demand, NOT BOUND

Table 8.3State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Metal powdersupplier capacity expansions reported; volumes not bound33Inferred
Casting and forgingstrain on large castings named as a bottleneck for two submarine programmes7Reported
Critical mineralsexport controls and price rises affect alloy inputs25Inferred
Machine supplyone maker in Chapter 11 and two with lower 2025 revenue345Reported

Couplings

  • MIN → INF powder and alloys
  • TRD → INF export controls
  • FIN → INF machine supply

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • powder volumes
  • qualified sources per alloy

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-15 Science and Engineering Frontier
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • SR-03 Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints
  • XT-12 Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology
  • XT-03 Robotics and Autonomous Systems

8.4Economy, investment and workforce

Revenue grew in 2025, but growth sat in services and materials while machine sales were weak. Workforce numbers are the thin part of the evidence.

24.2USD billion

global revenue, 20252

15.5percent

growth in printing services, 20252

3.6percent

growth in machine sales, 20252

Table 8.4State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Market revenueUSD 24.2 billion in 2025, up 10.9%, in a trade summary2Reported
Machine makerstwo listed makers reported lower 2025 revenue34Reported
ConsolidationChapter 11 filing in July 2025 and a Markforged purchase in April 20255Reported
Workforcea Navy need of 250,000 skilled workers is stated; no additive figure bound8Expert input

Couplings

  • FIN → INF machine supply
  • FIN → DAT software and files
  • HLT → INF workforce

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • market figures from the reports
  • workforce size and skills gaps

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-15 Science and Engineering Frontier
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • SR-03 Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints
  • XT-12 Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology
  • XT-03 Robotics and Autonomous Systems

8.5Security, standards and governance watch

Additive manufacturing is governed through standards committees, defence policy, health guidance and export controls. Build files cross borders more easily than machines.

2021strategy

DoD additive manufacturing strategy10

2024rule

US interim final rule on metal machines22

2017paper

SIPRI on missile technology controls21

Table 8.5State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
StandardsASTM F42 and ISO/TC 261 work; design guides published, feedstock re-use in draft11Reported
Defence policyDoD strategy of 2021 sets a common vision10Reported
Export controlsUS control on metal machines from 2024; SIPRI sets out the case for machines, feedstock and files2122Reported
Occupational healthNIOSH names inhalation, skin contact, fire and explosion hazards1920Reported

Couplings

  • INF → DAT build file exposure
  • GOV → TRD export controls
  • INF → HLT powder hazards

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • text of the 2024 rule
  • exposure data across facilities

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-15 Science and Engineering Frontier
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • SR-03 Global Supply Chains, Trade and Chokepoints
  • XT-12 Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology
  • XT-03 Robotics and Autonomous Systems

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 12NIST (ed.), AM-Bench (program page; 2025 benchmarks 8 metal and 1 polymer sets; 85 challenge submissions; conference November 2025; AM Bench 2028 in planning). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 6GE Aerospace (ed.), Manufacturing milestone: 30,000 additive fuel nozzles (company article, 4 October 2018; Auburn, Alabama; one piece replacing about 20; about 25% lighter; more than 40 printers; vendor announcement, weak evidence). GE Aerospace, Evendale. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 15Chen, L. et al., In-situ process monitoring and adaptive quality enhancement in laser additive manufacturing: a critical review, arXiv:2404.13673, submitted 21 April 2024 (abstract page read; accepted to the Journal of Manufacturing Systems). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 16Bhagat, K. and Rudraraju, S., A numerical investigation of dimensionless numbers characterising meltpool morphology of the laser powder bed fusion process, arXiv:2211.06312, submitted 11 November 2022 (abstract page read; simulation study). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 14Baumers, M., Tuck, C. and Hague, R., Selective heat sintering versus laser sintering: comparison of deposition rate, process energy consumption and cost performance, Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium proceedings, University of Texas at Austin (full text read; the year is inferred from the cited 2015 sources). Observation year 2015. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 9AML3D Limited (ed.), AML3D signs initial production parts order for US Navy submarines (ASX release, 17 September 2026; about AU$0.5 million; three copper-nickel components; 16 systems deployed; company forecast of up to 100 systems and 1,600 components by 2030 attributed to Navy forecasts; vendor announcement, weak evidence). AML3D, Adelaide. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 17Hong, G., Cho, J. and Cho, H., Neuro-symbolic closed-loop control of laser powder bed fusion with an in-loop ontology, arXiv:2608.05773, submitted 6 August 2026 (abstract page read; preprint, simulation only, not peer reviewed). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 8Maritime Industrial Base Program (ed.), Maritime Industrial Base Program highlights workforce mission at Virginia Tech (official release via the Defense Visual Information Distribution Service, event 18 September 2025; need for 250,000 skilled workers over a decade; Columbia-class and Virginia-class output goals for 2028). US Navy, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 7Jones, M. (NAVSUP Weapon Systems Support), Shattering bottlenecks: NAVSUP WSS partners with DLA and NAVSEA on submarine advanced manufacturing (official release via the Defense Visual Information Distribution Service, 30 June 2026; nearly 120 additive parts in development, 20 installed, more than 1,400 cumulative days of delay removed, lead times cut by up to 70% for some components; not independently audited). US Navy, Mechanicsburg. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: Continuum Powders (ed.), blog on powder supply bottlenecks for advanced manufacturing, October 2025, taken from a search summary; supplier commentary, weak evidence. Continuum Powders, Houston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 25UNVERIFIED, not opened: IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (July 2026; export controls and price moves for tungsten and other minerals, taken from search-result summaries that differ on some details; no figure used in copy). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 3Stratasys Ltd. (ed.), Stratasys releases fourth quarter and full year 2025 financial results (company release, 5 March 2026; revenue USD 551.1 million against USD 572.5 million in 2024; GAAP net loss USD 104.3 million). Stratasys, Rehovot and Eden Prairie. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 43D Systems Corporation (ed.), 3D Systems reports fourth quarter and full year 2025 financial results (company release, 9 March 2026; revenue USD 386.9 million, down 12%; Healthcare Solutions USD 179.6 million; Industrial Solutions USD 207.3 million). 3D Systems, Rock Hill. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 5Nano Dimension Ltd. (ed.), Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended 31 December 2025 (first 100,000 characters read; Desktop Metal Chapter 11 filing on 28 July 2025; Markforged acquisition closed 25 April 2025; revenue tables not read). Nano Dimension, Waltham. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 2Voulpiotis, F. (3Dnatives), Wohlers Report 2026: growth continues, but caution defines the AM market (trade article, 17 February 2026; weak evidence: a trade summary of a commercial report; reports 2025 revenue USD 24.231 billion, up 10.9%, services up 15.5% with 48% share, machine sales up 3.6%, Asia-Pacific up 19.8%, Europe and the Americas up 9%). 3Dnatives, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 10OSD ManTech Program Office (ed.), DoD additive manufacturing strategy (article page of the Defense Systems Information Analysis Center dated 1 March 2021; strategy released January 2021 by the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering; the page lists no figures; the strategy document itself was not opened). Defense Systems Information Analysis Center, Belcamp. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 223DPrint.com (ed.), US Department of Commerce issues new export controls on metal additive manufacturing (trade article, 18 September 2024; interim final rule; ECCN 2B910; comments due 5 November 2024; author analysis on scope; secondary source, weak evidence). 3DPrint.com, Chicago. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 21Brockmann, K. and Bauer, S., 3D printing and missile technology controls, SIPRI Background Paper, November 2017 (summary page read; machines, feedstock and digital build files). Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Stockholm. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 11NIST (ed.), Additive manufacturing standards (program page, updated 6 August 2026; ASTM F42, ISO/TC 261; ISO/ASTM 52911-1 and 52911-2 of 2019; ISO/ASTM 52922; work items WK72938, WK75184, WK78224, WK83109 in development). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 19NIOSH (ed.), Additive manufacturing (manufacturing sector page, dated 16 July 2026; hazards named: inhalation of powders, skin contact, fire and explosion, mechanical and ergonomic injury). National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 20American Industrial Hygiene Association (ed.), NIOSH evaluates metals exposures at manufacturing facility (news item, 11 September 2025, on a NIOSH health hazard evaluation dated February 2025 with visits in March and May 2023; secondary summary, the evaluation itself was not opened). AIHA, Falls Church. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Cite this chapter

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Chapter 8: Systems in depth. In Exponential Technology Report 2026: Additive and Advanced Manufacturing (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-XTECH-MANUFACTURING-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Additive and Advanced Manufacturing.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskExponential Technology

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.