• Reports
  • Baseline Edition 2026
  • Complete edition

Strategic Systems Report 2026: Global Polycrisis and Cascading Systems Risk

Edition home

Choose A4 or Letter in the print dialog; running heads and page numbers are added in print. This is a review copy: the signed PDF with its DOI is issued at release.

ReportsSR-01

Strategic Systems

Global Polycrisis 2026

Baseline Edition 2026NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINEGCRI for the Nexus Consortium

Imprint

Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor, the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI)
Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) for the Nexus Consortium, Toronto
Report number
NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE
Evidence close
30 September 2026, cut DC-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Status
Draft under stewardship review; not yet released
DOI and UNI
Issued at deposit
Licence
CC BY 4.0 for Nexus-authored text, tables and figures; third-party material keeps its own licence
Cite as
Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Strategic Systems Report 2026: Global Polycrisis and Cascading Systems Risk (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI). https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/editions/sr-01/

Contents

  1. ·

    Executive summary

  2. 1

    Chapter 1. Crises are entangled, not stacked

  3. 2

    Chapter 2. Key findings

  4. 3

    Chapter 3. Systems and sectors at baseline

  5. 4

    Chapter 4. Risks and capability

  6. 5

    Chapter 5. Concurrent breadbasket shortfall and energy price shock

  7. 6

    Chapter 6. Lenses and readings

  8. 7

    Chapter 7. The 2027 agenda

  9. 8

    Chapter 8. Systems in depth

  10. A

    Annex A. Methodology

  11. B

    Annex B. Data appendix

  12. C

    Annex C. References and record

Executive summary

The edition on a few pages: the abstract, the key messages, the headline finding and what each steward reads in it.

5 min read1 figure0 tables16 notesNR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

S.1Abstract

The world in 2026 faces crises that are entangled rather than additive. Researchers identify three causal mechanisms: common causes that stress several systems at once, domino effects that carry a shock from one system to the next, and feedbacks between systems that amplify both24. The 2026 evidence shows all three. Warming at 1.43 °C in 2025, after a record 1.55 °C in 2024, is a common cause across water, food, health and nature1. Natural-disaster losses of US$224 billion in 2025, half of them uninsured, move through household balance sheets and public budgets2, where 3.4 billion people already live in countries that spend more on interest than on health or education13. About 673 million people faced hunger in 20247 and 123.2 million were forcibly displaced12. Six of nine planetary boundaries are transgressed20. This Baseline Edition maps the mechanisms, fixes the reference state, and sets the questions the 2027 edition will test. It forecasts no collapse and ranks no threat.

S.2Key messages

Six readings that frame the global baseline, and the eight questions this edition answers, each with its status and source.

  1. 1.43 °C above 1850–1900 in 2025, after a record 1.55 °C in 2024; 2023–2025 averaged 1.48 °C.140

    How warm is the world?Reported

  2. Insured losses exceeded US$100 billion for the sixth year running; 2025 losses were driven by floods, storms and wildfires.2

    Are disaster losses rising?Reported

  3. Half of 2025 losses were uninsured; in Asia almost nine-tenths were.2

    Who carries the losses?Reported

  4. No: energy CO₂ set a record in 2024, although clean power supplied about 41% of electricity.46

    Are emissions falling?Reported

  5. 673 million people faced hunger in 2024; concurrent breadbasket failure is a rising tail risk.723

    Is the food system stable?Reported

  6. Wildlife populations fell by 73% on average from 1970 to 2020; six of nine planetary boundaries are transgressed.920

    How fast is nature changing?Reported

  7. Debt service: 3.4 billion people live where interest outweighs health or education spending.13

    What constrains the response?Reported

  8. A concurrent breadbasket shortfall coinciding with an energy and fertiliser price shock. SCN-SR01-BBF-01

    What will 2027 test first?Expert input

S.3Headline finding

ReportedEQL 4NRF-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-FIN-003

Insurers covered about 48% of the US$224 billion in natural-disaster losses in 2025, about 70% in North America, about half in Europe, about 12% in Asia and under a fifth in Africa.

Figure S.1Natural-disaster losses in 2025 (US$ billion)
ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
Insured108
Uninsured116

Source: Munich Re NatCatSERVICE 20252; the uninsured share is the difference between overall and insured losses.

The protection gap is widest where exposure is growing fastest and fiscal space is thinnest. Uninsured losses become household debt, delayed reconstruction and pressure on public budgets, which feed back into vulnerability before the next event21318.

S.4At a glance

8.2billion

people, 202411

1.55°C

record year, 202441

423.9ppm

CO₂ concentration, 20241

57.1Gt CO₂e

GHG emissions, 20233

123.2million

forcibly displaced, end-202412

102US$ tn

public debt, 202413

S.5What each steward reads in it

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports an entangled reading of global risk.

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people global risk arrives as a price rise, a heat wave or a flood, and its burden depends on where they live.

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. About half of disaster losses are uninsured, debt service crowds out adaptation, and climate disclosure standards are spreading.

NEXUS

Synthesis

The world’s crises share causes and channels.

S.6What this edition is, and is not

What this edition is

A question-led baseline: how crises in climate, food, energy, finance, health and conflict become entangled through common causes, domino effects and feedbacks. It reads the same global evidence as the global edition, through the mechanisms that connect it.

What it is not

Not a list of crises, a prediction of collapse, a ranking of threats or countries, or a policy recommendation. It states where the scientific community disagrees before stating what this edition concludes.

What comes next

National, regional and sector evidence binds each mechanism in 2027. Each edition reports what changed against this baseline, new observations, source revisions, method changes, scenario updates and corrections.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 24M. Lawrence, T. Homer-Dixon, S. Janzwood, J. Rockström, O. Renn and J. F. Donges, “Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement,” Global Sustainability, vol. 7, e6, 2024.back
  2. 1WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, WMO-No. 1391. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, March 2026.back
  3. 2Munich Re (ed.), Natural disasters in 2025: NatCatSERVICE full-year figures. Munich Re, Munich, January 2026.back
  4. 13UNCTAD (ed.), A World of Debt 2025: It Is Time for Reform. UNCTAD, Geneva, 2025.back
  5. 7FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (eds.), The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025. FAO, Rome, 2025.back
  6. 12UNHCR (ed.), Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2024. UNHCR, Copenhagen, June 2025.back
  7. 20K. Richardson, W. Steffen, W. Lucht et al., “Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries,” Science Advances, vol. 9, eadh2458, 2023.back
  8. 40WMO (ed.), “WMO confirms 2025 was one of warmest years on record.” Press release. WMO, Geneva, January 2026.back
  9. 4International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Energy Review 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  10. 6Ember (ed.), Global Electricity Review 2025. Ember, London, 2025.back
  11. 23F. Gaupp, J. Hall, S. Hochrainer-Stigler and S. Dadson, “Changing risks of simultaneous global breadbasket failure,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 10, pp. 54–57, 2020.back
  12. 9WWF (ed.), Living Planet Report 2024: A System in Peril. WWF, Gland, 2024.back
  13. 18UNDRR (ed.), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025: Resilience Pays. UNDRR, Geneva, 2025.back
  14. 11UN DESA Population Division (ed.), World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results. United Nations, New York, 2024.back
  15. 41WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2024, WMO-No. 1368. WMO, Geneva, 2025.back
  16. 3UNEP (ed.), Emissions Gap Report 2024: No more hot air … please! UNEP, Nairobi, 2024.back

Crises are entangled, not stacked

Part I describes systems and their couplings. It ranks no country and assesses no government or organisation.

7 min read2 figures2 tables14 notesNR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

1.1The questions this part answers

Key questions

  • Where is global risk concentrated, and in which systems?
  • Which couplings carry shocks across sectors and borders?
  • Which capabilities hold under compound stress, and which are only documented?
  • What must the federation measure first in 2027?

In this part

  • Narrative
  • Headline finding
  • Lead figure
  • Five mechanism chapters
  • Twelve-domain reading
  • Sector screens
  • Dependency matrix
  • Risk objects
  • Capability ladder
  • Scenario
  • Three lenses
  • Portfolio

1.2The argument

Polycrisis is often used as a mood. This edition uses it as a model. Lawrence and co-authors define three mechanisms through which crises become entangled: common causes that stress several systems at once, domino effects that carry a shock from one system to the next, and inter-systemic feedbacks that amplify both24. Each can be observed, and each can be tested.

The forcing layer is moving fast. 2024 was the warmest year on record at 1.55 °C above the late nineteenth century, and 2025 the second or third warmest at 1.43 °C; the eleven years 2015–2025 are the eleven warmest observed. Earth’s energy imbalance and ocean heat content reached record highs in 2025, which means the system is still gaining heat1.

Losses follow, but unevenly. Natural disasters caused US$224 billion in losses in 2025, and insured losses exceeded US$100 billion for the sixth year running. No major hurricane struck the United States mainland; the total was driven by floods, severe storms and wildfires, led by the Los Angeles fires at about US$53 billion2. Frequency, not one peak event, now sets the global loss record.

Who pays depends on where the hazard lands. Insurers covered about 70% of losses in North America but about 12% in Asia and under a fifth in Africa2. Where cover is thin, losses fall on households and on public budgets that are already stretched: 3.4 billion people live in countries that spend more on interest than on health or education13.

Beneath the losses, the core systems are already under strain. About 673 million people faced hunger in 20247, 2.2 billion lacked safely managed drinking water8, air pollution kills about 6.7 million people a year14, and monitored wildlife populations have fallen by 73% on average since 19709. Each of these is coupled to the others through land, water and energy16.

New couplings are forming at the frontier. Data centres used about 415 TWh of electricity in 2024, about 1.5% of the world total, and their use is projected to roughly double by 20305. The minerals behind batteries, grids and chips are refined in very few places: the top three refining countries hold, on average, about 86% of supply for key energy minerals36. Technology risk is therefore also energy, water and supply-chain risk.

Capabilities have grown, but unevenly. 108 countries reported multi-hazard early-warning systems in 2024, more than twice as many as in 201535, and just over half of the world’s people are now covered by at least one social-protection benefit44. Adaptation finance, however, falls short of need by an estimated US$187–359 billion a year42.

This edition therefore reads global risk as a property of couplings rather than a ranking of threats. The dependency matrix, the risk objects, the capability ladder and the compound scenario that follow all ask the same two questions: where does a shock travel next, and who holds the capability to stop it?

Figure 1.1Where did 2025’s natural-disaster losses fall? Overall losses by region (US$ billion)

North America, including Central America and the Caribbean, carried the largest losses, and about 70% of them were insured. Asia’s losses were more than half as large, but only about US$9 billion was insured. Africa’s recorded losses were small in money terms but almost entirely uninsured2.

ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
North America133
Asia73
Europe11
Africa3

Source: as cited in the note to this figure. Year 2025.

Figure ID FIG-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-01-003

93US$ bn

insured in North America2

9US$ bn

insured in Asia2

17,200deaths

in natural disasters, 20252

166US$ bn

from floods, storms and wildfires2

1.3Twenty couplings between five systems

The global matrix types the twenty couplings between the five core systems. Strengths are Nexus estimates from the cited assessments and analogue events; they set the starting graph that federation evidence will test in 2027.

Figure 1.2Couplings between the five systems

Each line is one coupling from one system to another, drawn by the strength the edition assigns. Strengths are Nexus estimates from the cited evidence and analogue events.

  • Strong
  • Moderate
  • Weak

Source: this edition’s coupling matrix (Table 1.1); status Estimated.

Table 1.1Coupling matrix: from the row system to the column system
From, toWATENEFOOHLTBIO
WAT Water·STRONG
hydro · thermal cooling
STRONG
irrigation · rain-fed yield
STRONG
safe water · sanitation
STRONG
flows · wetlands
ENE EnergyMODERATE
pumping · desalination
·STRONG
fuel · fertiliser · cold chain
STRONG
air pollution · cooling
MODERATE
land use · mining
FOO FoodSTRONG
≈70% of withdrawals
WEAK
bioenergy feedstock
·STRONG
nutrition · food safety
STRONG
land conversion
HLT HealthWEAK
workforce
WEAK
workforce
MODERATE
labour · disease
·WEAK
residues
BIO BiodiversitySTRONG
regulation · filtration
MODERATE
biomass · hydrology
STRONG
pollination · soils
MODERATE
zoonoses · medicines
·
Strength: strong, moderate or weak; a Nexus estimate (status Estimated) from cited evidence and analogue events. The scale is defined in Annex A.

Transmission paths

  1. 01

    CLI → FOO → TRD

    Heat and drought in several breadbaskets at once cut exports and raise prices.

    Inferred 2010–2011 price spike

  2. 02

    ENE → FOO

    Gas and fertiliser prices pass into food prices.

    Reported 2022 price shock

  3. 03

    CLI → WAT → ENE

    Drought cuts hydro and cooling water for thermal plants.

    Inferred 2022 European drought

  4. 04

    BIO → HLT

    Land-use change raises zoonotic spillover risk.

    Inferred IPBES nexus16

  5. 05

    FIN → all

    Debt service crowds out adaptation and recovery.

    Reported post-2022 debt stress13

1.4Reinforcing loops

A shock entering either system of a loop can return amplified through the other.

Table 1.2Pairs of systems where both directions are rated strong
LoopFirst directionSecond direction
WAT and FOOWater to food: irrigation · rain-fed yieldFood to water: ≈70% of withdrawals
WAT and BIOWater to biodiversity: flows · wetlandsBiodiversity to water: regulation · filtration
FOO and BIOFood to biodiversity: land conversionBiodiversity to food: pollination · soils
A causal-loop reading of the matrix (Sterman, Business Dynamics, 2000): structural, from estimated strengths, not a measured feedback.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 24M. Lawrence, T. Homer-Dixon, S. Janzwood, J. Rockström, O. Renn and J. F. Donges, “Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement,” Global Sustainability, vol. 7, e6, 2024.back
  2. 1WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, WMO-No. 1391. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, March 2026.back
  3. 2Munich Re (ed.), Natural disasters in 2025: NatCatSERVICE full-year figures. Munich Re, Munich, January 2026.back
  4. 13UNCTAD (ed.), A World of Debt 2025: It Is Time for Reform. UNCTAD, Geneva, 2025.back
  5. 7FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (eds.), The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025. FAO, Rome, 2025.back
  6. 8WHO and UNICEF (eds.), Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000–2022. Joint Monitoring Programme, New York and Geneva, 2023.back
  7. 14World Health Organization (ed.), “Ambient (outdoor) air pollution” and “Household air pollution” fact sheets. WHO, Geneva, retrieved 2026-09-30.back
  8. 9WWF (ed.), Living Planet Report 2024: A System in Peril. WWF, Gland, 2024.back
  9. 16P. D. McElwee, P. A. Harrison, T. L. van Huysen et al. (eds.), Thematic Assessment Report on the Interlinkages among Biodiversity, Water, Food and Health. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054back
  10. 5International Energy Agency (ed.), Energy and AI. World Energy Outlook Special Report. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  11. 36International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  12. 35WMO and UNDRR (eds.), Global Status of Multi-Hazard Early Warning Systems 2024. WMO and UNDRR, Geneva, 2024.back
  13. 44International Labour Organization (ed.), World Social Protection Report 2024–26: Universal Social Protection for Climate Action and a Just Transition. ILO, Geneva, 2024.back
  14. 42UNEP (ed.), Adaptation Gap Report 2024: Come Hell and High Water. UNEP, Nairobi, 2024.back

Key findings

Twelve findings carry the global baseline. They are grouped by system and never ranked. Each resolves to its source or, where Nexus analysis is involved, to its stated method.

3 min read1 figure0 tables14 notesNR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

2.1Headline finding

ReportedEQL 4NRF-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-FIN-003

Insurers covered about 48% of the US$224 billion in natural-disaster losses in 2025, about 70% in North America, about half in Europe, about 12% in Asia and under a fifth in Africa.

Figure 2.1Natural-disaster losses in 2025 (US$ billion)
ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
Insured108
Uninsured116

Source: Munich Re NatCatSERVICE 20252; the uninsured share is the difference between overall and insured losses.

Implication

The protection gap is widest where exposure is growing fastest and fiscal space is thinnest. Uninsured losses become household debt, delayed reconstruction and pressure on public budgets, which feed back into vulnerability before the next event21318.

What would move it

Regional loss splits by peril (agenda item P-02), the growth of sovereign and parametric cover, and the 2026 and 2027 loss years would each move this finding.

2.2Climate forcing

  1. ReportedEQL 5NRF-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-CLI-001

    Global temperature was 1.43 ± 0.13 °C above 1850–1900 in 2025, after a record 1.55 °C in 2024; 2015–2025 are the eleven warmest years.1

  2. ReportedEQL 3NRF-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-CLI-010

    Six of nine planetary boundaries were assessed as transgressed in 2023, and five major tipping systems are at risk at current warming.2021

2.3Finance

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-FIN-002

    Natural disasters caused US$224 billion in losses in 2025, of which US$108 billion (48%) was insured.2

  2. ReportedEQL 4NRF-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-FIN-003

    Insured shares differ sharply by region: about 70% in North America, about half in Europe, about 12% in Asia and under a fifth in Africa (2025).2

  3. ReportedEQL 4NRF-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-FIN-011

    Public debt reached US$102 trillion in 2024; 3.4 billion people live in countries that spend more on interest than on health or education.13

2.4Energy

  1. ReportedEQL 5NRF-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-ENE-004

    Energy-related CO₂ emissions reached a record 37.8 Gt in 2024; total greenhouse-gas emissions were 57.1 Gt CO₂e in 2023.34

  2. ReportedEQL 3NRF-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-ENE-005

    Data centres used about 415 TWh of electricity in 2024, about 1.5% of the world total, with use projected to roughly double by 2030.5

2.5Food

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-FOO-006

    About 673 million people faced hunger in 2024, and 2.3 billion were moderately or severely food insecure.7

2.6Water

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-WAT-007

    2.2 billion people lacked safely managed drinking water and 3.5 billion lacked safely managed sanitation in 2022.8

2.7Health

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-HLT-008

    Ambient and household air pollution together cause about 6.7 million deaths a year.14

2.8Biodiversity

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-BIO-009

    Monitored wildlife populations declined by 73% on average between 1970 and 2020; 17.6% of land and 8.4% of the ocean are protected.910

2.9Systemic

  1. Expert inputEQL 2NRF-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-SYS-012

    The leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is a concurrent breadbasket shortfall coinciding with an energy and fertiliser price shock. § scenario

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 2Munich Re (ed.), Natural disasters in 2025: NatCatSERVICE full-year figures. Munich Re, Munich, January 2026.back
  2. 13UNCTAD (ed.), A World of Debt 2025: It Is Time for Reform. UNCTAD, Geneva, 2025.back
  3. 18UNDRR (ed.), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025: Resilience Pays. UNDRR, Geneva, 2025.back
  4. 1WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, WMO-No. 1391. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, March 2026.back
  5. 20K. Richardson, W. Steffen, W. Lucht et al., “Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries,” Science Advances, vol. 9, eadh2458, 2023.back
  6. 21T. M. Lenton, D. I. Armstrong McKay, S. Loriani et al. (eds.), The Global Tipping Points Report 2023. University of Exeter, Exeter, 2023.back
  7. 3UNEP (ed.), Emissions Gap Report 2024: No more hot air … please! UNEP, Nairobi, 2024.back
  8. 4International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Energy Review 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  9. 5International Energy Agency (ed.), Energy and AI. World Energy Outlook Special Report. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  10. 7FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (eds.), The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025. FAO, Rome, 2025.back
  11. 8WHO and UNICEF (eds.), Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000–2022. Joint Monitoring Programme, New York and Geneva, 2023.back
  12. 14World Health Organization (ed.), “Ambient (outdoor) air pollution” and “Household air pollution” fact sheets. WHO, Geneva, retrieved 2026-09-30.back
  13. 9WWF (ed.), Living Planet Report 2024: A System in Peril. WWF, Gland, 2024.back
  14. 10UNEP-WCMC and IUCN (eds.), Protected Planet Report 2024. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, Cambridge and Gland, 2024.back

Systems and sectors at baseline

5 min read0 figures2 tables16 notesNR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

3.1Where each system stood at evidence close

WAT · Water

People without safely managed drinking water

2.2billion

3.5 billion lacked safely managed sanitation in the same year.

Reported2022WHO/UNICEF JMP8

ENE · Energy

Energy-related CO₂ emissions

37.8Gt CO₂

A record high, up 0.8% on 2023, as demand grew faster than clean supply.

Reported2024IEA4

FOO · Food

People facing hunger

673million

About 8.2% of the world population; 2.3 billion were moderately or severely food insecure.

Reported2024SOFI 20257

HLT · Health

Deaths each year from ambient and household air pollution

6.7million

Air pollution couples energy, cities and health more directly than any other pathway.

Reported2019–2020WHO14

BIO · Biodiversity

Average decline of monitored wildlife populations

−73%

1970–2020. 17.6% of land and 8.4% of the ocean are protected, against 30% by 2030.

Reported1970–2020WWF9 ·10

SYS · Cross-system

Natural-disaster losses · insured

224 · 108US$ bn

The sixth year above US$100 billion insured; floods, storms and fires dominated.

Reported2025Munich Re2

3.2Domain posture

Each of the twelve coupled domains is read in words, not scored. The reading states where the global evidence points; the coupling column names the dependency that carries risk across systems and borders.

Table 3.1Each domain read in words, not scored
DomainPosture at baselineCouplingStatus
WAT2.2 billion people without safely managed drinking water; basin stress concentrated in arid and fast-growing regions.WAT → FOO irrigation · WAT → ENE coolingReported EQL 4
ENERecord energy CO₂ in 2024; clean power at about 41% of electricity; demand rising with cooling and compute.ENE ↔ WAT · ENE → FOO inputsReported EQL 5
FOO673 million people facing hunger; production concentrated in a few breadbaskets and exporters.FOO ← WAT, ENE · FOO → TRDReported EQL 4
HLTAir pollution and heat are the leading environmental health burdens; One Health risks persist.HLT ← CLI, ENE, BIOReported EQL 4
BIOWildlife populations down 73% since 1970; protection below 30% targets on land and sea.BIO → WAT, FOO · BIO ← land useReported EQL 4
CLI1.43 °C in 2025 after a record 1.55 °C; energy imbalance at a record high.forcing on all five systemsReported EQL 5
INFChokepoints in shipping, power and data networks concentrate exposure.INF → TRD, ENE, FOOInferred EQL 3
FINInsured losses above US$100 billion for six years; about half of losses uninsured; debt constrains response.FIN ← CLI · FIN → sovereignsReported EQL 4
DATCloud, cable and satellite dependencies are concentrated and only partly mapped.DAT → ENE, FIN, HLTExpert input EQL 2
AICData centres used about 415 TWh in 2024; use projected to roughly double by 2030.AIC → ENE, WAT, MINReported EQL 3
MINRefining of key energy minerals concentrated: the top three refiners average about 86%.MIN → ENE transition, AICReported EQL 3
TRDTrade fragmentation and export restrictions raise transmission risk for food and minerals.TRD → all systemsInferred EQL 3

3.3Sector screens

All sixteen global sectors are screened on the same grammar as every national edition, so later editions can say what changed. The evidence column describes coverage of the baseline evidence, not the performance of the sector.

Table 3.2Sectors: baseline evidence and the exposure to watch
CodeSectorBaseline evidenceExposure to watchEvidence coverage
GS-00Cross-systementangled crises; six of nine boundaries transgressed20compound and cascading shocksPARTIAL
GS-01Water2.2 billion without safely managed water8drought and flood extremesGOOD
GS-02Energyrecord CO₂; about 41% clean power46heat demand; mineral concentrationGOOD
GS-03Food and agrifood673 million facing hunger7concurrent breadbasket failureGOOD
GS-04Health6.7 million air-pollution deaths a year14heat, pandemics, antimicrobial resistancePARTIAL
GS-05Finance and economyUS$102 trillion public debt13debt distress after disastersGOOD
GS-06Development123.2 million forcibly displaced12conflict–climate compoundingPARTIAL
GS-07Climate1.43 °C in 20251extremes and tipping riskGOOD
GS-08DisasterUS$224 billion losses in 20252frequency of medium eventsGOOD
GS-09Infrastructurechokepoint concentrationshipping, power and cable outagesPARTIAL
GS-10Citiesmost people now live in cities11urban heat and floodingPARTIAL
GS-11Biodiversity−73% wildlife populations9land-use change and fireGOOD
GS-12Earth observationstrong global observing systemscontinuity of key missionsPARTIAL
GS-13Cyber and digitalconcentrated cloud and network dependencesystemic outagesTHIN
GS-14Policy and institutionsnew pandemic and ocean agreements2732implementation and finance gapsPARTIAL
GS-15Science and engineeringdeep research base; AI adoption rising37translation and dual useTHIN

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 8WHO and UNICEF (eds.), Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000–2022. Joint Monitoring Programme, New York and Geneva, 2023.back
  2. 4International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Energy Review 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  3. 7FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (eds.), The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025. FAO, Rome, 2025.back
  4. 14World Health Organization (ed.), “Ambient (outdoor) air pollution” and “Household air pollution” fact sheets. WHO, Geneva, retrieved 2026-09-30.back
  5. 9WWF (ed.), Living Planet Report 2024: A System in Peril. WWF, Gland, 2024.back
  6. 10UNEP-WCMC and IUCN (eds.), Protected Planet Report 2024. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, Cambridge and Gland, 2024.back
  7. 2Munich Re (ed.), Natural disasters in 2025: NatCatSERVICE full-year figures. Munich Re, Munich, January 2026.back
  8. 20K. Richardson, W. Steffen, W. Lucht et al., “Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries,” Science Advances, vol. 9, eadh2458, 2023.back
  9. 6Ember (ed.), Global Electricity Review 2025. Ember, London, 2025.back
  10. 13UNCTAD (ed.), A World of Debt 2025: It Is Time for Reform. UNCTAD, Geneva, 2025.back
  11. 12UNHCR (ed.), Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2024. UNHCR, Copenhagen, June 2025.back
  12. 1WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, WMO-No. 1391. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, March 2026.back
  13. 11UN DESA Population Division (ed.), World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results. United Nations, New York, 2024.back
  14. 27World Health Assembly (ed.), WHO Pandemic Agreement, resolution WHA78.1. WHO, Geneva, May 2025.back
  15. 32United Nations (ed.), Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. United Nations, New York, 2023.back
  16. 37Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (ed.), Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2025. Stanford HAI, Stanford, 2025.back

Risks and capability

Four global risk objects open the portfolio. Order carries no rank. Each is read across driver, exposure, vulnerability, capacity, cascade and consequence; loss metrics are added only where they can be modelled.

3 min read0 figures1 table15 notesNR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

4.1Risk objects

Each risk is read across the chain from hazard to consequence, with its status and evidence-quality level.

  1. InferredEQL 3RSK-SR01-FOO-001

    Concurrent breadbasket shortfall

    Driver
    heat and drought in several producing regions in one season
    Exposure
    import-dependent countries; low-income households
    Vulnerability
    concentrated exports; thin stocks; price-sensitive diets
    Capacity
    trade openness; reserves; social protection
    Cascade
    CLI → FOO → TRD → HLT
    Horizon
    seasonal · 1 and 5 years
  2. ReportedEQL 4RSK-SR01-FIN-002

    Uninsured losses where cover is thin

    Driver
    rising frequency of floods, storms and fires
    Exposure
    Asia, Africa, small island states
    Vulnerability
    low insurance; limited fiscal space13
    Capacity
    sovereign and parametric cover; development finance
    Cascade
    CLI → FIN → households, sovereigns
    Horizon
    annual
  3. ReportedEQL 3RSK-SR01-MIN-003

    Concentration in critical-mineral refining

    Driver
    rising demand for transition and compute minerals
    Exposure
    battery, grid and chip supply chains
    Vulnerability
    top three refiners average about 86%36
    Capacity
    stockpiles; recycling; diversification
    Cascade
    MIN → ENE, AIC → FIN
    Horizon
    1–5 years
  4. InferredEQL 3RSK-SR01-CLI-004

    Crossing of Earth-system tipping points

    Driver
    continued warming above 1.5 °C
    Exposure
    coasts, coral reefs, monsoon and polar systems
    Vulnerability
    irreversibility once thresholds are crossed
    Capacity
    emission cuts; monitoring; adaptation
    Cascade
    CLI → BIO, WAT → all
    Horizon
    10 years and beyond

4.2Capability ladder

Existence is not readiness. Each of the fifteen capability functions is placed on the ladder by the strongest public evidence at the global level, from a policy listing to performance in real events.

Table 4.1Capabilities on the ladder of evidence: listed, exists, demonstrated, tested
FunctionRungLevelStrongest public evidence at baseline
Prevention and mitigationEXISTSParis and Sendai frameworks; emissions still rising32931
Monitoring and observationDEMONSTRATEDglobal observing systems underpin WMO and C3S records139
Early warningEXISTS108 countries reported multi-hazard early-warning systems in 202435
Preparedness and planningEXISTSnational adaptation plans uneven; adaptation finance gap of US$187–359 billion a year42
Redundancy and reservesLISTEDno coordinated global food or mineral reserve
ResponseDEMONSTRATEDinternational humanitarian response in real events; chronically underfunded
Continuity of critical servicesEXISTSsector-level plans; limited cross-border testing
RecoveryEXISTSdevelopment finance and debt relief instruments
AdaptationEXISTSplans widespread; finance below need42
Social protectionEXISTS52.4% of people covered by at least one benefit44
Finance and insuranceEXISTSdeep markets in some regions; about half of losses uninsured2
Institutional coordinationEXISTSnew pandemic agreement and IHR amendments2728
Technical infrastructureEXISTSglobal networks concentrated in few chokepoints
WorkforceLISTEDhealth and emergency workforce shortages widely reported
Research capacityADEQUATEIPCC and IPBES assessments; translation uneven1516
A capability listed in policy is not a tested one; each rung is the strongest public evidence at baseline.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 13UNCTAD (ed.), A World of Debt 2025: It Is Time for Reform. UNCTAD, Geneva, 2025.back
  2. 36International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  3. 3UNEP (ed.), Emissions Gap Report 2024: No more hot air … please! UNEP, Nairobi, 2024.back
  4. 29UNFCCC (ed.), Paris Agreement. United Nations, Paris, 2015.back
  5. 31UNDRR (ed.), Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. UNDRR, Geneva, 2015.back
  6. 1WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, WMO-No. 1391. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, March 2026.back
  7. 39Copernicus Climate Change Service (ed.), Global Climate Highlights 2024. ECMWF, Reading, January 2025.back
  8. 35WMO and UNDRR (eds.), Global Status of Multi-Hazard Early Warning Systems 2024. WMO and UNDRR, Geneva, 2024.back
  9. 42UNEP (ed.), Adaptation Gap Report 2024: Come Hell and High Water. UNEP, Nairobi, 2024.back
  10. 44International Labour Organization (ed.), World Social Protection Report 2024–26: Universal Social Protection for Climate Action and a Just Transition. ILO, Geneva, 2024.back
  11. 2Munich Re (ed.), Natural disasters in 2025: NatCatSERVICE full-year figures. Munich Re, Munich, January 2026.back
  12. 27World Health Assembly (ed.), WHO Pandemic Agreement, resolution WHA78.1. WHO, Geneva, May 2025.back
  13. 28World Health Assembly (ed.), Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005), resolution WHA77.17. WHO, Geneva, June 2024.back
  14. 15H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.), Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. IPCC, Geneva, 2023.back
  15. 16P. D. McElwee, P. A. Harrison, T. L. van Huysen et al. (eds.), Thematic Assessment Report on the Interlinkages among Biodiversity, Water, Food and Health. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054back

Concurrent breadbasket shortfall and energy price shock

A conditional statement under stated assumptions, never a prediction.

2 min read0 figures0 tables1 noteNR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

5.1Assumptions

Scenario SCN-SR01-BBF-01: what is assumed, and what is held constant.

Baseline
the 2026 reference state in this edition
Drivers
heat and drought across two or more major grain-exporting regions in one season, while gas and fertiliser prices spike
Analogues
2007–2008 and 2010–2011 food price spikes; 2022 energy and fertiliser shock
Interventions
none modelled, the specification describes the unmitigated case
Run state
narrative specification; quantified run scheduled for 202723

5.2The cascade, step by step

  1. 1

    CLI → FOO

    heat and drought cut yields in several exporters at once

    2010 · 2012

  2. 2

    ENE → FOO

    fertiliser and fuel costs raise production costs

    2022

  3. 3

    FOO → TRD

    export restrictions amplify the price rise

    2008 · 2011

  4. 4

    TRD → HLT

    food-price rises cut diets in import-dependent households

    2008

  5. 5

    FIN → sovereigns

    import bills and subsidies widen deficits

    2022

  6. 6

    HLT → development

    hunger and displacement rise in fragile settings

    2011

5.3The scenario as a table of steps

How the shock in scenario SCN-SR01-BBF-01 would travel through Global Polycrisis‘s coupled systems, step by step, under the assumptions the edition states.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Climate to foodHeat and drought cut yields in several exporters at once. Analogue or source: 2010 · 2012.Edition SR-01, scenario SCN-SR01-BBF-01, step 1
02 Energy to foodFertiliser and fuel costs raise production costs. Analogue or source: 2022.Edition SR-01, scenario SCN-SR01-BBF-01, step 2
03 Food to tradeExport restrictions amplify the price rise. Analogue or source: 2008 · 2011.Edition SR-01, scenario SCN-SR01-BBF-01, step 3
04 Trade to healthFood-price rises cut diets in import-dependent households. Analogue or source: 2008.Edition SR-01, scenario SCN-SR01-BBF-01, step 4
05 Finance to sovereignsImport bills and subsidies widen deficits. Analogue or source: 2022.Edition SR-01, scenario SCN-SR01-BBF-01, step 5
06 Health to developmentHunger and displacement rise in fragile settings. Analogue or source: 2011.Edition SR-01, scenario SCN-SR01-BBF-01, step 6

A teaching model of a conditional scenario under the edition’s stated assumptions: not a forecast, not a prediction and not a warning. Sources: Global Polycrisis 2026, scenario SCN-SR01-BBF-01 (2026); Global Polycrisis 2026, references (NR-CIT-1) (2026).

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 23F. Gaupp, J. Hall, S. Hochrainer-Stigler and S. Dadson, “Changing risks of simultaneous global breadbasket failure,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 10, pp. 54–57, 2020.back

Lenses and readings

The global baseline is read through each steward’s lens, then once as a whole. Each lens is a projection of reviewed findings, not a separate argument.

10 min read0 figures6 tables37 notesNR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

6.1Three lenses

One edition, read by each steward. The lens of this site comes first.

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports an entangled reading of global risk. Warming and losses set records in the same years; frequency, not one peak event, drives losses; and the five core systems share dependence on water, energy and land. Evidence is strongest for climate and losses, and weakest for digital dependencies and tipping proximity.

CLI-001 · FIN-002 · CLI-010 · SYS-012

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people global risk arrives as a price rise, a heat wave or a flood, and its burden depends on where they live. The baseline asks that public debate weigh the couplings and the distribution of losses, not a list of separate threats.

FIN-003 · FOO-006 · HLT-008

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. About half of disaster losses are uninsured, debt service crowds out adaptation, and climate disclosure standards are spreading33. These show where finance-readiness evidence will matter. Nothing here is advice, a rating or an approval.

FIN-002 · FIN-003 · FIN-011

NEXUS

Synthesis

The world’s crises share causes and channels. The 2027 programme should test the mechanisms rather than list the crises: bind the common causes, trace the dominoes through fiscal and food channels, and measure the feedbacks that make recovery slower than the next shock.

SYS-012 · P-01 · P-02

6.2GCRI reading: the model card

GCRI’s reading of this edition is its model card: what the national model is, what it computes and where it stops. It is printed in full in Annex A, with the methods it belongs to. Annex A, methodology

6.3Global Risks Forum reading: editorial essays

Four signed essays by the Reports editorial team set out the positions this edition takes. They are interpretation, labelled as such; the evidence they draw on is in the findings register.

In 2025 no major hurricane reached the United States mainland, and insured losses still passed US$100 billion for the sixth year running. Floods, hail, storms and wildfires, individually “medium”, now add up to totals that once required a single great catastrophe. Global resilience has to be measured against many events in close succession, not one event of record size.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 01

Medium events are the new catastrophe

About half of 2025’s disaster losses were uninsured, and almost nine-tenths in Asia. Where cover is thin, a flood becomes household debt and a fiscal shock, and recovery competes with interest payments. Closing the gap is less a question of insurance products than of fiscal space, data and risk reduction.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 02

The protection gap is a development gap

Data centres used about 415 TWh of electricity in 2024, and refining of the minerals behind batteries and chips is concentrated in very few places. The digital transition is also an energy, water and minerals transition, and its risks sit in substations, cooling towers and refineries as much as in software.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 03

Frontier technology is physical

A small number of regions grow most of the world’s traded grain. A season in which several of them fail together, more likely as the world warms, would travel through prices to every import-dependent household. The world tracks harvests one country at a time; the risk lives in their concurrence.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 04

Breadbaskets are a shared exposure

6.4Global Risks Alliance reading: 2027 polycrisis readiness pack

The registers that open the 2027 global cycle. At baseline each is initialised from this edition.

Table 6.12027 polycrisis readiness pack
ItemRegisterState at baselineFirst 2027 entry
E1Global risk state deltabaseline set by this editionchanges against the baseline
E2WEFH+B state deltafive global system readings setindicator updates and freshness
E3Agenda and Portfolio movementeight agenda items · seven proposed objectsadmission decisions
E4Federation delivery registerCanada issued; 85 editions in programmeregional and sector baselines
E5Consortium capability registernational consortia formingfirst contributions
E6Leadership questions and challengesnone yetfirst challenge log
E7Foundry technical statenational environments preparedfirst federation cut
E8Publication candidatestwelve findings carried forwardPUBLISH · HOLD dispositions
E9Universe readinessone candidate missionadmission and role spine
E10Correction registernonefirst federation-wide cycle

Publication dispositions

  • Publish
  • Hold
  • Needs evidence
  • Restricted
  • Superseded

6.5Nexus Standards reading: standards and regulatory watch

International instruments that shape the systems in this edition, by status on the retrieval date. The edition assesses no one’s compliance.

  • IN FORCE
  • ADOPTED
  • ADOPTED · OPEN FOR SIGNATURE
  • PUBLISHED · VOLUNTARY
Table 6.2Standards and regulatory watch
InstrumentBodyScopeStatusRelevance
Paris Agreement29UNFCCCglobalIN FORCEemissions, adaptation
Kunming-Montreal Framework30CBDglobalADOPTED 202230% by 2030
Sendai Framework 2015–203031UNDRRglobalADOPTED 2015disaster risk reduction
High Seas (BBNJ) Agreement32United Nationsocean beyond national jurisdictionADOPTED 2023marine biodiversity
International Health Regulations, 2024 amendments28WHOglobalADOPTED 2024pandemic preparedness
WHO Pandemic Agreement27WHOglobalADOPTED · OPEN FOR SIGNATUREprevention, access
IFRS S1 and S233ISSBjurisdictions adoptingPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYclimate disclosure
Regulation (EU) 2024/168934EUEuropean UnionIN FORCE · PHASEDAI governance

Changed since 2024

  • The World Health Assembly adopted the Pandemic Agreement in May 202527
  • Amendments to the International Health Regulations were adopted in 202428
  • Jurisdictions began adopting the ISSB climate disclosure standard33

To watch in 2027

  • Updated nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement29
  • Implementation of the High Seas Agreement32
  • National biodiversity strategies against the 2030 targets30

6.6Risk Academy reading: literature and evidence review, science and assessments

The review behind this edition covers global assessments, peer-reviewed science and the institutional reports that bind its findings. Systematic reviews for each agenda item begin in 2027.

Review protocol

Question
What does the published evidence establish about the world’s coupled water, energy, food, health and biodiversity risks?
Sources searched
global assessments; UN and multilateral statistics; peer-reviewed literature; industry loss data
Window
releases available at evidence close, 30 September 2026
Selection
sources that bind or contextualise a finding in this edition
Next step
systematic reviews for agenda items P-01 to P-06 in 2027
Table 6.3Assessments and peer-reviewed science
ReferenceTypeYearRoleUsed for
Lee and Romero (eds.)15assessment2023supportsforcing and risk
McElwee et al. (eds.)16assessment2024frameworknexus interlinkages
O’Brien et al. (eds.)17assessment2024contexttransformative change
Richardson et al.20journal article2023supportsplanetary boundaries
Rockström et al.47journal article2023frameworksafe and just boundaries
Lenton et al. (eds.)21report2023supportstipping systems
Zscheischler et al.22journal article2018frameworkcompound events
Gaupp et al.23journal article2020supportsbreadbasket risk
Lawrence et al.24journal article2024frameworkpolycrisis mechanisms
Romanello et al.26journal article2024supportsheat and health
Table 6.4Institutional flagships
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
State of the Global Climate141WMO2025–26supportstemperature, ocean heat
GAR 202518UNDRR2025supportsdisaster risk
Emissions and Adaptation Gap342UNEP2024supportsemissions, finance gap
Global Energy Review4IEA2025supportsenergy emissions
Table 6.5UN and multilateral statistics
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
SOFI 20257FAO and partners2025supportshunger
JMP 20238WHO · UNICEF2023supportswater and sanitation
World Population Prospects11UN DESA2024supportspopulation
Global Trends12UNHCR2025supportsdisplacement
A World of Debt13UNCTAD2025supportsdebt service
Air-quality fact sheets14WHO2024supportsair-pollution deaths
World Social Protection Report44ILO2024supportssocial protection
Table 6.6Industry, energy and nature data
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
NatCatSERVICE 20252Munich Re2026supportslosses
Global Electricity Review6Ember2025supportsclean power share
Energy and AI5IEA2025supportsdata-centre demand
Critical Minerals Outlook36IEA2025supportsrefining concentration
Living Planet Report9WWF2024supportswildlife trends
Protected Planet10UNEP-WCMC · IUCN2024supportsprotected areas

Where the evidence agrees

  • The world is warming at a historic rate, with record ocean heat115
  • Losses are rising in trend and driven by frequency across perils218
  • The five core systems are tightly interlinked16

Where it is unsettled

  • How close individual tipping systems are to their thresholds21
  • How often concurrent breadbasket failures will occur at each warming level23
  • How fast AI-driven electricity demand will grow5

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 33International Sustainability Standards Board (ed.), IFRS S1 General Requirements and IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures. IFRS Foundation, London, 2023.back
  2. 29UNFCCC (ed.), Paris Agreement. United Nations, Paris, 2015.back
  3. 30Convention on Biological Diversity (ed.), Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, Decision 15/4. CBD Secretariat, Montreal, 2022.back
  4. 31UNDRR (ed.), Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. UNDRR, Geneva, 2015.back
  5. 32United Nations (ed.), Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. United Nations, New York, 2023.back
  6. 28World Health Assembly (ed.), Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005), resolution WHA77.17. WHO, Geneva, June 2024.back
  7. 27World Health Assembly (ed.), WHO Pandemic Agreement, resolution WHA78.1. WHO, Geneva, May 2025.back
  8. 34European Parliament and Council of the European Union (eds.), Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal L, 12 July 2024, as amended.back
  9. 15H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.), Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. IPCC, Geneva, 2023.back
  10. 16P. D. McElwee, P. A. Harrison, T. L. van Huysen et al. (eds.), Thematic Assessment Report on the Interlinkages among Biodiversity, Water, Food and Health. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054back
  11. 17K. O’Brien, L. Garibaldi and A. Agrawal (eds.), Thematic Assessment Report on the Underlying Causes of Biodiversity Loss and the Determinants of Transformative Change. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, 2024.back
  12. 20K. Richardson, W. Steffen, W. Lucht et al., “Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries,” Science Advances, vol. 9, eadh2458, 2023.back
  13. 47J. Rockström, J. Gupta, D. Qin et al., “Safe and just Earth system boundaries,” Nature, vol. 619, pp. 102–111, 2023.back
  14. 21T. M. Lenton, D. I. Armstrong McKay, S. Loriani et al. (eds.), The Global Tipping Points Report 2023. University of Exeter, Exeter, 2023.back
  15. 22J. Zscheischler, S. Westra, B. J. J. M. van den Hurk et al., “Future climate risk from compound events,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 8, pp. 469–477, 2018.back
  16. 23F. Gaupp, J. Hall, S. Hochrainer-Stigler and S. Dadson, “Changing risks of simultaneous global breadbasket failure,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 10, pp. 54–57, 2020.back
  17. 24M. Lawrence, T. Homer-Dixon, S. Janzwood, J. Rockström, O. Renn and J. F. Donges, “Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement,” Global Sustainability, vol. 7, e6, 2024.back
  18. 26M. Romanello et al., “The 2024 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change,” The Lancet, vol. 404, pp. 1847–1896, 2024.back
  19. 1WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, WMO-No. 1391. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, March 2026.back
  20. 41WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2024, WMO-No. 1368. WMO, Geneva, 2025.back
  21. 18UNDRR (ed.), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025: Resilience Pays. UNDRR, Geneva, 2025.back
  22. 3UNEP (ed.), Emissions Gap Report 2024: No more hot air … please! UNEP, Nairobi, 2024.back
  23. 42UNEP (ed.), Adaptation Gap Report 2024: Come Hell and High Water. UNEP, Nairobi, 2024.back
  24. 4International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Energy Review 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  25. 7FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (eds.), The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025. FAO, Rome, 2025.back
  26. 8WHO and UNICEF (eds.), Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000–2022. Joint Monitoring Programme, New York and Geneva, 2023.back
  27. 11UN DESA Population Division (ed.), World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results. United Nations, New York, 2024.back
  28. 12UNHCR (ed.), Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2024. UNHCR, Copenhagen, June 2025.back
  29. 13UNCTAD (ed.), A World of Debt 2025: It Is Time for Reform. UNCTAD, Geneva, 2025.back
  30. 14World Health Organization (ed.), “Ambient (outdoor) air pollution” and “Household air pollution” fact sheets. WHO, Geneva, retrieved 2026-09-30.back
  31. 44International Labour Organization (ed.), World Social Protection Report 2024–26: Universal Social Protection for Climate Action and a Just Transition. ILO, Geneva, 2024.back
  32. 2Munich Re (ed.), Natural disasters in 2025: NatCatSERVICE full-year figures. Munich Re, Munich, January 2026.back
  33. 6Ember (ed.), Global Electricity Review 2025. Ember, London, 2025.back
  34. 5International Energy Agency (ed.), Energy and AI. World Energy Outlook Special Report. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  35. 36International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  36. 9WWF (ed.), Living Planet Report 2024: A System in Peril. WWF, Gland, 2024.back
  37. 10UNEP-WCMC and IUCN (eds.), Protected Planet Report 2024. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, Cambridge and Gland, 2024.back

The 2027 agenda

Eight bounded questions open the 2027 polycrisis agenda. Each comes from a baseline finding, names the initiative that will carry it and the first output due in the 2027 polycrisis edition.

5 min read0 figures6 tables3 notesNR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

7.1Questions for the operational series

  1. P-01

    How likely is a simultaneous shortfall across major breadbaskets at 1.5–2 °C, and which import-dependent countries are most exposed?

    INI-SR01-FOO-01 · breadbasket concurrency; first output: concurrency model and exposure register.

  2. P-02

    Where does the uninsured share of disaster losses land, by region, peril and income group?

    INI-SR01-FIN-02 · global protection-gap atlas; first output: region-by-peril loss table, 2015–2025.

  3. P-03

    How do AI compute demand, power systems, water and critical-mineral refining constrain one another?

    INI-SR01-TEC-03 · compute–power–minerals nexus; first output: demand and concentration map.

  4. P-04

    Which tipping systems are closest, and which indicators would give early warning?

    INI-SR01-CLI-04 · tipping indicators register; first output: indicator register with evidence grades.

  5. P-05

    How does debt service constrain adaptation and recovery where hazard is highest?

    INI-SR01-FIN-05 · debt–adaptation constraint; first output: exposure–fiscal space matrix.

  6. P-06

    How do heat and water stress couple through health, labour and food in the tropics?

    INI-SR01-HLT-06 · heat–water–labour; first output: regional heat–work exposure layer.

  7. P-07

    Where do early-warning gaps coincide with high hazard and thin insurance?

    To be admitted in 2027; first output: gap overlay with WMO and UNDRR data.

  8. P-08

    How do conflict, displacement and climate hazards compound in fragile settings?

    To be admitted in 2027; first output: scoping note.

7.2Portfolio proposed for the Q1 2027 alignment

Six initiatives and one Universe mission candidate are proposed for the 2027 global portfolio. They are programme objects, no partner, funder or member is attached to them in this edition.

Table 7.1Objects proposed for the first operational quarter
IDObjectKindQuestionState
INI-SR01-FOO-01Breadbasket concurrency modelInitiativeP-01PROPOSED
INI-SR01-FIN-02Global protection-gap atlasInitiativeP-02PROPOSED
INI-SR01-TEC-03Compute–power–minerals nexusInitiativeP-03PROPOSED
INI-SR01-CLI-04Tipping indicators registerInitiativeP-04PROPOSED
INI-SR01-FIN-05Debt–adaptation constraintInitiativeP-05PROPOSED
INI-SR01-HLT-06Heat–water–labour exposureInitiativeP-06PROPOSED
MSN-SR01-2027-01Breadbasket–energy compound Universe missionMissionP-01Candidate

7.3The pathway

The global edition is the top of the federation. It does not collect its own evidence. It reads national, regional and sector editions through one governed evidence graph, so a correction made anywhere travels everywhere. At baseline the federation is designed and its first edition is issued.

  1. 01

    National Foundries

    continuous national evidence environments

    PREPARED · first sealed cuts in Q1 2027

  2. 02

    National Models and Portfolios

    each country as a system of systems

    CANADA v0 ISSUED · 25 further national baselines

  3. 03

    Quarterly national reports

    State & Agenda, Evidence, Stress Test, Annual

    BASELINE STAGE · Q1 2027 opens the series

  4. 04

    Regional aggregation

    ten regional clusters

    10 PLANNED · regional baselines in 2026–2027

  5. 05

    Global sector and strategic models

    GS-01…15 · SR-01…14 · XT-01…20

    49 PLANNED · pilots: GS-01, SR-01, XT-01

  6. 06

    Universe

    annual proving environment

    CANDIDATE MISSION · global mandate in 2027

  7. 07

    Global Report

    this series

    BASELINE ISSUED · 2027 annual edition

  8. 08

    Evidence and correction

    one graph, many projections

    OPEN · first federation-wide correction cycle in 2027

7.4Universe 2027, evidence pack for the polycrisis candidate mission

  1. 01

    Mandate

  2. 02

    Core Build · 1 month

  3. 03

    Action · 1 week

  4. 04

    Evidence seal

  5. 05

    Portfolio correction

  6. 06

    Next mandate

Table 7.2Universe 2027, evidence pack for the polycrisis candidate mission
ItemRecordStateTiming
F1Annual mandate recordPLANNEDafter the Q2 2027 alignment
F2Core Build recordPLANNEDone month before the exercise
F3Exercise evidencePLANNEDduring the Action week
F4Decision packetsPLANNEDexercise state only
F5Proof receiptsPLANNEDscoped to each recorded check
F6After-action reportPLANNEDwithin one quarter
F7Upgrade docketPLANNEDrouted to the Portfolio
F8Portfolio renewalPLANNED2027 polycrisis annual edition
F9Public synthesisPLANNEDpublic-safe extracts only

Mission

ID
MSN-SR01-2027-01 · breadbasket–energy compound shock
Role spine
Leadership sponsor · Institutional anchor · Mission lead, drawn from national pathways
Receiving actors
to be identified with the mandate

7.5Handoffs and routing

Where the baseline’s findings go next. A handoff routes a finding for awareness, review or work; it transfers no authority.

Table 7.3Handoffs and routing
FindingRouted toPurposeClass
CLI-001 · temperaturepublic recordreference for the 2027 seriesPUBLIC
FIN-002 · lossesfinance-readiness review (key F)protection-gap atlas P-02PUBLIC
FIN-003 · regional insured sharesregional consortiaregional loss splitsPUBLIC
ENE-005 · data-centre demandINI-SR01-TEC-03compute–power–minerals nexusPUBLIC
FOO-006 · hungerINI-SR01-FOO-01breadbasket concurrencyPUBLIC
CLI-010 · boundaries and tippingINI-SR01-CLI-04tipping registerPUBLIC
FIN-011 · debt serviceINI-SR01-FIN-05debt–adaptation constraintPUBLIC
SYS-012 · compound pathwayMSN-SR01-2027-01Universe candidateCONSORTIUM
Table 7.4Routing rules by publication class
ClassWhere it goesWho can see it
PUBLICthe published edition and its evidence bundleanyone
CONSORTIUMgoverned rooms of the federationconsortium members under agreement
CONTROLLEDneed-to-know channelsnamed competent actors only

7.6Feeds and signal register

Table 7.5Feeds watched from 2027
FeedProducerLatencyFeeds into
Monthly climate bulletinsCopernicus Climate Change ServicemonthlyCLI-001
ENSO outlooksWMO and national centresmonthlySCN-SR01-BBF-01
Global disaster alertsGDACS (UN and European Commission)near real timeFIN findings
Disease outbreak newsWHOper eventhealth signals
Crop and market monitoringFAO GIEWS · AMISmonthlyRSK-SR01-FOO-001
Energy market reportsIEAmonthlyENE findings
Catastrophe loss estimatesreinsurers and index providersper eventFIN-002

Escalation routes

  • none · keep monitoring
  • research question
  • project
  • risk object
  • annual publication
  • signal report
Table 7.6Signals at baseline
IDSignalCorroborationSystemsRoute
SIG-SR01-001Earth’s energy imbalance at a record high in 20251CORROBORATEDCLI · alltipping register P-04
SIG-SR01-002Non-peak perils dominate insured losses2CORROBORATEDFIN · CLIprotection-gap atlas P-02
SIG-SR01-003Rapid growth in data-centre electricity demand5PARTIALENE · WAT · MINresearch question P-03

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, WMO-No. 1391. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, March 2026.back
  2. 2Munich Re (ed.), Natural disasters in 2025: NatCatSERVICE full-year figures. Munich Re, Munich, January 2026.back
  3. 5International Energy Agency (ed.), Energy and AI. World Energy Outlook Special Report. IEA, Paris, 2025.back

Systems in depth

One section per system: its state at evidence close, its exposures and what the operational series will watch.

6 min read0 figures5 tables18 notesNR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

8.1Common causes

A common cause stresses several systems at once. Warming is the clearest: one forcing that loads water, food, health and nature in the same years124.

1.43°C

warming in 20251

6 of 9boundaries

transgressed20

US$102trillion

public debt, 202413

Table 8.1Evidence at baseline
InstanceMechanism in actionEvidenceStatus
Warming1.43 °C in 2025 after a record 1.55 °C; stress on all five core systems141Reported
Energy pricesone price shock passes into food, fertiliser and household budgets4Inferred
Land-use changedrives biodiversity loss, emissions and zoonotic risk together1617Reported
Interest ratesa rise tightens every indebted budget at once13Inferred

Pathways in this mechanism

  • Warming loads water, food, health and nature together
  • One energy shock reaches food, fertiliser and budgets
  • Interest-rate rises tighten every indebted budget

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • Attribution of joint stress to each common cause
  • Timing of common shocks across regions

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-01 Water
  • GS-03 Food
  • GS-05 Finance
  • SR-05 Fiscal resilience
  • SR-09 Planetary boundaries

8.2Domino effects

A domino effect carries a shock from one system to the next. Food and finance are the main channels at baseline.

673million

facing hunger, 20247

123.2million

forcibly displaced, 202412

116US$ bn

uninsured disaster losses, 20252

Table 8.2Evidence at baseline
InstanceMechanism in actionEvidenceStatus
Drought → food → pricesbreadbasket shortfalls transmitted through trade23Reported
Disaster → budgetsuninsured losses become public and household debt213Inferred
Prices → hungerfood-price rises cut diets in import-dependent households7Reported
Conflict → displacement123.2 million forcibly displaced at the end of 202412Reported

Pathways in this mechanism

  • Breadbasket shortfall → prices → hunger
  • Disaster → uninsured losses → public debt
  • Conflict → displacement → host-country strain

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • Speed of price transmission to households
  • Fiscal cost of disasters by country group

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-01 Water
  • GS-03 Food
  • GS-05 Finance
  • SR-05 Fiscal resilience
  • SR-09 Planetary boundaries

8.3Inter-systemic feedbacks

Feedbacks make crises reinforce each other: debt slows recovery, slow recovery deepens vulnerability, and vulnerability raises the cost of the next shock.

3.4billion

where interest exceeds health or education13

US$187–359bn a year

adaptation finance gap42

+167%

heat deaths of over-65s vs 1990s26

Table 8.3Evidence at baseline
InstanceMechanism in actionEvidenceStatus
Debt–disaster loopinterest costs crowd out adaptation, raising future losses1342Inferred
Hunger–conflict loopfood insecurity and conflict reinforce each other712Inferred
Nature–climate loopecosystem loss weakens carbon and water regulation1620Reported
Heat–health–labour loopheat cuts work capacity and income26Reported

Pathways in this mechanism

  • Debt slows recovery; slow recovery raises the next loss
  • Hunger and conflict reinforce each other
  • Nature loss weakens climate and water regulation

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • Recovery times after major disasters
  • Strength of the debt–disaster loop by region

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-01 Water
  • GS-03 Food
  • GS-05 Finance
  • SR-05 Fiscal resilience
  • SR-09 Planetary boundaries

8.4Shared vulnerabilities

Entanglement is worst where buffers are thinnest. Fiscal space, insurance cover and social protection decide whether a shock stays contained.

48%

of 2025 disaster losses insured2

52.4%

covered by social protection44

108countries

with multi-hazard early warning35

Table 8.4Evidence at baseline
InstanceMechanism in actionEvidenceStatus
Fiscal space3.4 billion people where interest exceeds health or education spending13Reported
Insuranceabout half of 2025 losses uninsured; about 12% insured in Asia2Reported
Social protection52.4% of people covered by at least one benefit44Reported
Early warning108 countries with multi-hazard systems in 202435Reported

Pathways in this mechanism

  • Thin buffers turn shocks into crises
  • Where insurance, protection and warning are all thin, losses compound
  • Buffers bought before the shock cost least

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • Overlap of hazard, debt and thin cover
  • Tested performance of buffers in real events

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-01 Water
  • GS-03 Food
  • GS-05 Finance
  • SR-05 Fiscal resilience
  • SR-09 Planetary boundaries

8.5Thresholds and tipping

Some couplings change character past a threshold. Planetary boundaries and tipping systems mark where gradual stress can become abrupt change.

6 of 9boundaries

transgressed, 202320

5systems

tipping at risk at current warming21

record2025

Earth energy imbalance1

Table 8.5Evidence at baseline
InstanceMechanism in actionEvidenceStatus
Planetary boundariessix of nine assessed as transgressed in 202320Reported
Tipping systemsfive major systems at risk at current warming21Reported
Safe and just limitsboundaries defined for people as well as the planet47Reported
Energy imbalancerecord high in 2025; the system is still gaining heat1Reported

Pathways in this mechanism

  • Gradual stress can become abrupt change
  • Some tipping systems interact and may cascade
  • Thresholds shrink the time available to respond

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • Early-warning indicators for each tipping system
  • Interactions between tipping systems

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-01 Water
  • GS-03 Food
  • GS-05 Finance
  • SR-05 Fiscal resilience
  • SR-09 Planetary boundaries

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, WMO-No. 1391. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, March 2026.back
  2. 20K. Richardson, W. Steffen, W. Lucht et al., “Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries,” Science Advances, vol. 9, eadh2458, 2023.back
  3. 13UNCTAD (ed.), A World of Debt 2025: It Is Time for Reform. UNCTAD, Geneva, 2025.back
  4. 41WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2024, WMO-No. 1368. WMO, Geneva, 2025.back
  5. 4International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Energy Review 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  6. 16P. D. McElwee, P. A. Harrison, T. L. van Huysen et al. (eds.), Thematic Assessment Report on the Interlinkages among Biodiversity, Water, Food and Health. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054back
  7. 17K. O’Brien, L. Garibaldi and A. Agrawal (eds.), Thematic Assessment Report on the Underlying Causes of Biodiversity Loss and the Determinants of Transformative Change. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, 2024.back
  8. 24M. Lawrence, T. Homer-Dixon, S. Janzwood, J. Rockström, O. Renn and J. F. Donges, “Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement,” Global Sustainability, vol. 7, e6, 2024.back
  9. 7FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (eds.), The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025. FAO, Rome, 2025.back
  10. 12UNHCR (ed.), Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2024. UNHCR, Copenhagen, June 2025.back
  11. 2Munich Re (ed.), Natural disasters in 2025: NatCatSERVICE full-year figures. Munich Re, Munich, January 2026.back
  12. 23F. Gaupp, J. Hall, S. Hochrainer-Stigler and S. Dadson, “Changing risks of simultaneous global breadbasket failure,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 10, pp. 54–57, 2020.back
  13. 42UNEP (ed.), Adaptation Gap Report 2024: Come Hell and High Water. UNEP, Nairobi, 2024.back
  14. 26M. Romanello et al., “The 2024 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change,” The Lancet, vol. 404, pp. 1847–1896, 2024.back
  15. 44International Labour Organization (ed.), World Social Protection Report 2024–26: Universal Social Protection for Climate Action and a Just Transition. ILO, Geneva, 2024.back
  16. 35WMO and UNDRR (eds.), Global Status of Multi-Hazard Early Warning Systems 2024. WMO and UNDRR, Geneva, 2024.back
  17. 21T. M. Lenton, D. I. Armstrong McKay, S. Loriani et al. (eds.), The Global Tipping Points Report 2023. University of Exeter, Exeter, 2023.back
  18. 47J. Rockström, J. Gupta, D. Qin et al., “Safe and just Earth system boundaries,” Nature, vol. 619, pp. 102–111, 2023.back

Methodology

How the edition was made: methods, the model card, the evidence cut and its age, the acceptance record and the glossary.

9 min read0 figures12 tables6 notesNR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

A.1Methods

The global baseline uses published values and four simple derivations. Each is shown in full so that any reader can reproduce it.

Table A.1Methods
No.DerivationCalculationResult
(1)Insured share of 2025 losses108 ÷ 224≈ 48%
(2)Uninsured 2025 losses224 − 108US$116 bn
(3)Insured share in Asia9 ÷ 73≈ 12%
(4)Insured share in North America93 ÷ 133≈ 70%
Table A.2Coupling strength scale (matrix and model card)
StrengthDefinition
STRONGa disruption in the source system has historically changed the target system’s service or output within one season, in more than one region
MODERATEan effect is documented but buffered or slower
WEAKan effect is plausible but not documented at global scale
Table A.3Status grammar
LabelRule
Reportedvalue as issued by its source, with year
Inferredreasoned from cited evidence; never a measurement
EstimatedNexus analytical value with stated method
Scenarioconditional on stated assumptions
Expert inputstructured editorial judgement awaiting evidence

A.2Model card, Polycrisis System Model v0

Model ID
MDL-SR01-POLYCRISIS · v0.1
Purpose
represent the world as coupled water, energy, food, health and biodiversity systems with forcing and transmission layers
Family
graph-based system of systems
Inputs
the cited sources of this edition; no proprietary data
Method
expert-specified coupling strengths (STRONG · MODERATE · WEAK) from assessments and analogue events
Validation
none yet, first validation against federation evidence in 2027
Uncertainty
qualitative; strengths are hypotheses, not measurements
Domain of validity
global scale; not for country, regional or asset-level use
Reproducibility
strength table and sources published in this edition
20couplings

typed in v0

11strong

documented within one season

5moderate

documented, buffered

4weak

plausible, undocumented

A.3The baseline evidence cut

Every Nexus edition is published from a frozen evidence cut. The global baseline cut is documentary: it pins the exact edition of every source cited. Federation cuts begin with the first national Foundry cuts in 2027.

Cut ID
DC-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Type
baseline documentary cut
Resolution policy
pinned · as of 30 September 2026
Sources pinned
47 cited sources, each at the edition and retrieval date in the references
Model runs
none at baseline, analytical values are stated with their method
Digest
computed at freeze and recorded in the publication record
Supersedes
nothing, first cut of the series
Superseded by
the 2027 polycrisis annual cut

Lineage

  1. 01

    source edition

  2. 02

    pinned citation

  3. 03

    finding

  4. 04

    page

  5. 05

    publication record

Table A.4From the baseline cut to the federation cut
ElementBaseline 20262027 global annual
Sourcescited global publications, pinned by editionnational, regional and sector cuts through one graph
Analysisstated methods and editorial estimatestyped analysis specifications
ModelsPolycrisis System Model v0 specificationmodel runs with receipts
Findingstwelve baseline findingsfindings re-bound to federation evidence
Reviewfive passes scheduledfive passes on the exact digest

A.4Evidence age and coverage

A 2026 global edition rests on evidence observed in many different years. This page shows each time base, so that no single year label hides older evidence.

Table A.5Evidence age and coverage
IndicatorObservedReleasedCadenceNext release
Global mean temperature2025Mar 2026annualMar 2027
Natural-disaster losses2025Jan 2026annualJan 2027
Total GHG emissions2023Oct 2024annualannual
Energy-related CO₂2024Mar 2025annualannual
Hunger and food insecurity2024Jul 2025annualannual
Safely managed water2022Jul 2023biennialbiennial
Air-pollution deaths2019–2020periodicperiodicnext WHO update
Wildlife population index1970–2020Oct 2024biennial2026 edition
Forced displacement2024Jun 2025annualannual
Public debt20242025annualannual
Table A.6Coverage by system at baseline
SystemCoverageThinnest dimension
Climate forcingGOODregional extremes and tipping proximity
EnergyGOODcompute demand and water use
FinanceGOODlosses in low-income regions
FoodGOODconcurrency of shortfalls
WaterPARTIALgroundwater and basin stress
HealthPARTIALheat mortality outside high-income regions
BiodiversityPARTIALecosystem condition beyond protected areas
Digital and cyberTHINdependency mapping

A.5Evidence cards, two anchor sources

Issued by the World Meteorological Organization from nine international temperature datasets and contributions from national meteorological services, regional climate centres and UN partners. Annual, released each March. Role: binds CLI-001 and the record ocean-heat and energy-imbalance signals.

EVD-SR01-001

State of the Global Climate 20251

Issued by Munich Re from its global natural-disaster loss database, maintained since 1980. Overall and insured losses with fatalities, by peril and region; 10- and 30-year inflation-adjusted averages. Role: binds FIN-002 and FIN-003.

EVD-SR01-002

NatCatSERVICE 2025 full-year figures2

Table A.7Quality dimensions at baseline
DimensionEVD-SR01-001EVD-SR01-002
Completenessnear-global; gaps filled statisticallyreported and estimated losses
Timelinessabout three months after the yearweeks after the year
Revisiondatasets revised as records improveevent estimates revised
Method transparencydatasets and methods publishedsummary methodology published
External validationmultiple independent datasetscompared with other loss providers

Evidence cards to follow in 2027

  • SOFI 20257, hunger estimation and uncertainty
  • JMP8, water and sanitation service ladders
  • Living Planet Index9, population trend method
  • A World of Debt13, interest and social spending comparisons

A.6Publication acceptance record

Editorial self-check at evidence close. Every applicable item carries a disposition; the remaining items are review, approval and deposit.

Table A.8Publication acceptance record
GroupAreaItemsPassN/APending
D1Identity and scope8800
D2Source and data12912
D3Analysis and models12381
D4Findings and claims9801
D5Figures, tables, maps10622
D6Editorial and citations10802
D7Review and approval130013
D8Artefact and design12705
D9Registry and release9009

Publication gate

Conditions met
14 of 23 at evidence close
Blocking problems
none recorded
Open conditions
reviews, approval of the exact digest, deposit, registry pointer

Not applicable at baseline

Model runs
first runs in Q1 2027
Maps
plates in Q2 2027
Waivers
none

A.7Status words

Table A.9The status every value carries
StatusWhat it means
ObservedMeasured directly and published by the source.
ReportedPublished statistics of an official or institutional source.
DeclaredStated by the body concerned; not independently measured.
EstimatedA Nexus estimate from cited evidence, with its method in Annex A.
ModelledProduced by a stated model from cited inputs.
InferredReasoned from cited evidence; not measured.
ForecastA projection by the cited source.
SimulatedA simulation result under stated assumptions.
ScenarioA conditional statement under stated assumptions; never a prediction.
Expert inputExpert judgement, recorded with its basis.
CandidateProposed for a later edition; not yet evidence.
Evidence-quality levels (EQL 1 to 5) grade the source behind a value; they are not a score of the subject.

A.8How the edition is made, released and corrected

Every edition is built from a sealed evidence cut, reviewed under three keys, signed and deposited before any site shows it as published; corrections go to Nexus Standards as change proposals and feed the next cut.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Evidence arrives from the pillarsFoundry seals observations and indicator series, Universe hands over after-action and scenario findings, and contributions are screened at every gateway, including this site’s.
02 The cut is sealedOn the cut date the evidence is pinned under one identifier, so anyone can rebuild the edition from exactly what it was built on.
03 The edition is assembledThe edition is drafted from its template and content pack. Agents may draft; they never publish and never decide.
04 The keys turnAt the publisher of record the truth key comes first: every value is checked against its source or stated method before the meaning and capital keys turn. No edition moves on until every key has been turned by a named steward.
05 The gate opensA named approver releases one exact digest of the edition; any change after this point is a new version, never a silent edit.
06 Signed and depositedThe PDF, the web edition and the data bundle are signed together with a manifest and an RO-Crate description, and deposited on Zenodo with a concept and a version DOI.
07 Published on five sitesOnly then do the five Reports sites show the edition as published, each reading it through its own lens.
08 Corrections go to StandardsMethod and correction findings go to Nexus Standards as change proposals; citations, corrections and new contributions feed the next evidence cut.

A teaching model of the process, not a forecast and not a record of any run; dates and counts on this page come from the programme record. Sources: Reports governance at GCRI Canada (2026); Zenodo, repository of record for Reports deposits (2026).

Lifecycle, one state at a time: Draft, Computed, Evidence bound, Reviewed, Approved for release, Published, Corrected, Superseded. This edition is a draft.

A.9Glossary and abbreviations

Table A.10Series terms
TermMeaning
Baseline Editionthe inaugural annual edition that fixes the reference state for the series
WEFH+Bwater, energy, food, health and biodiversity, the national nexus core
Couplinga typed dependency through which one system transmits to another
Protection gapthe share of losses not covered by insurance
Capability ladderLISTED → EXISTS → ADEQUATE → TESTED → DEMONSTRATED
EQLevidence-quality level, 1–5
Evidence cuta frozen resolution of exact sources and versions
NNC · NLC · NWGNational Nexus Consortium · National Leadership Council · National Working Groups
Table A.11Abbreviations used in this edition
AbbreviationExpansion
AMISAgricultural Market Information System
BBNJBiodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (High Seas Agreement)
C3SCopernicus Climate Change Service
ENSOEl Niño–Southern Oscillation
GARGlobal Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction
GDACSGlobal Disaster Alert and Coordination System
GIEWSGlobal Information and Early Warning System on Food and Agriculture
IHRInternational Health Regulations (2005)
IPBESIntergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
IPCCIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
ISSBInternational Sustainability Standards Board
JMPWHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme
SOFIThe State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World
WMOWorld Meteorological Organization

A.10Technical annex

Table A.12Technical annex
ItemAnnexContentsStatus
A.1Indicator definitionsthe global indicator set, with units and sourcesIN THIS EDITION
A.2Coupling strengthsthe twenty-cell matrix and its rationaleIN THIS EDITION
A.3Scenario specificationSCN-SR01-BBF-01 assumptions and signpostsIN THIS EDITION
A.4Capability placementsrung evidence for fifteen functionsIN THIS EDITION
A.5Model diagnosticsfirst runs and validation2027
A.6Sensitivity analysesinfluence of coupling strengths2027
A.7Regional notesregional baseline cardsWITH REGIONAL EDITIONS
A.8Review statementspass-by-pass review recordAT RELEASE

A.1 · indicator definition, global mean near-surface temperature

Construct
annual global mean near-surface air temperature anomaly
Unit
°C relative to 1850–1900
Method
synthesis of nine international datasets
Source
WMO State of the Global Climate 20251
Uncertainty
±0.13 °C (90% range)
Known limits
a single year above 1.5 °C does not mean the Paris limit is passed

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, WMO-No. 1391. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, March 2026.back
  2. 2Munich Re (ed.), Natural disasters in 2025: NatCatSERVICE full-year figures. Munich Re, Munich, January 2026.back
  3. 7FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (eds.), The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025. FAO, Rome, 2025.back
  4. 8WHO and UNICEF (eds.), Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000–2022. Joint Monitoring Programme, New York and Geneva, 2023.back
  5. 9WWF (ed.), Living Planet Report 2024: A System in Peril. WWF, Gland, 2024.back
  6. 13UNCTAD (ed.), A World of Debt 2025: It Is Time for Reform. UNCTAD, Geneva, 2025.back

Data appendix

The indicator set with its sources, the source registers, the licences of every kind of material and the formats of the edition.

8 min read0 figures8 tables21 notesNR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

B.1The indicator set

Table B.1Global baseline indicator set
IndicatorValueUnitYearStateSource
Global mean temperature above 1850–19001.43°C2025Reported1
Record year temperature1.55°C2024Reported41
Three-year average temperature1.48°C2023–2025Reported40
CO₂ concentration423.9ppm2024Reported1
Total GHG emissions57.1Gt CO₂e2023Reported3
Energy-related CO₂37.8Gt CO₂2024Reported4
Data-centre electricity use≈415TWh2024Reported5
Natural-disaster losses224US$ billion2025Reported2
Insured disaster losses108US$ billion2025Reported2
Disaster deaths17,200deaths2025Reported2
People facing hunger673million2024Reported7
Without safely managed water2.2billion2022Reported8
Air-pollution deaths6.7million a year2019–2020Reported14
Wildlife population change−73%1970–2020Reported9
Protected land · ocean17.6 · 8.4%2024Reported10
Population8.2billion2024Reported11
Forcibly displaced123.2million2024Reported12
Public debt102US$ trillion2024Reported13
Covered by social protection52.4%2023Reported44

B.2Global source register

The governed source set behind this edition. Each source keeps its authority, coverage, cadence and role; categories describe origin, not truth.

Domains bound by the register

  • WAT
  • ENE
  • FOO
  • HLT
  • BIO
  • CLI
  • FIN
  • TRD
  • MIN
  • AIC
Table B.3Global source register
SourceCategoryCoveragePeriodCadenceRole
State of the Global Climate1UN technical bodyglobal1850–2025annualCLI
NatCatSERVICE2industryglobal1980–2025annualFIN
Emissions Gap Report3UN programmeglobal1990–2023annualCLI · ENE
Global Energy Review4intergovernmentalglobal2024annualENE
SOFI 20257UN agenciesglobal2024annualFOO
JMP8UN agenciesglobal2000–2022biennialWAT · HLT
Living Planet Report9civil societyglobal1970–2020biennialBIO
World Population Prospects11UN statisticsglobal1950–2100biennialprofile
Global Trends12UN agencyglobal2024annualdevelopment
A World of Debt13UN agencyglobal2024annualFIN
Air-quality data14UN agencyglobal2019–2020periodicHLT
Critical Minerals Outlook36intergovernmentalglobal2024annualMIN

B.3Regional reading, ten regional clusters

Map plates follow with the regional Baseline Editions, when boundary sources and public-safe resolutions are bound. This page gives the regional reading in table form, and ranks no region.

Table B.4Regional reading, ten regional clusters
RegionPrincipal hazardsSystems most exposedBaseline evidence
North Americawildfire, severe storms, hurricanes, heatinsurance, power, housing2025 losses2
South Americadrought, flood, firehydropower, agriculture, forestsregional assessments15
Europeheat, flood, drought, wildfirehealth, energy, agriculture2025 losses2
Eurasiaheat, drought, permafrost thawagriculture, infrastructureassessments15
Middle East and North Africaextreme heat, water scarcitywater, food imports, healthwater reports38
Africadrought, flood, heatfood, health, livelihoodslosses largely uninsured2
South Asiaheat, monsoon floods, cycloneshealth, labour, agricultureheat–health26
East Asiatyphoons, floods, heatmanufacturing, cities, power2025 losses2
ASEANtyphoons, floods, sea-level risecoasts, agriculture, supply chainsassessments15
Oceania-Pacificcyclones, floods, sea-level risesmall islands, coasts, insuranceassessments15

B.4Regional card, South Asia

  • region
  • basin
  • monsoon system
  • corridor
Systems in view
health, labour, water, food, energy
Defining hazards
extreme heat before the monsoon; monsoon floods; cyclones on the Bay of Bengal
Couplings
CLI → HLT heat; WAT → FOO monsoon-fed agriculture; ENE → HLT cooling demand
Capability evidence
cyclone early warning credited with large falls in deaths over recent decades35
Gaps
heat mortality and labour-loss data; groundwater depletion
Agenda items
P-06 · P-07

Pre-monsoon heat is the region’s leading climate–health exposure, falling hardest on outdoor workers and people without cooling [26].

HEALTH

Heat and work

Agriculture depends on monsoon timing and groundwater; a late or weak monsoon couples water, food prices and rural incomes [38].

WATER AND FOOD

The monsoon as infrastructure

Cyclone warning and evacuation along the Bay of Bengal is among the clearest cases of early warning saving lives at scale [35].

EARLY WARNING

A demonstrated capability

B.5How countries appear in the global edition

Countries enter the global edition through their own national editions, on one card grammar. They are read against peer distributions and thresholds, never placed in a league table.

Table B.5How countries appear in the global edition
Card fieldWhat it showsSource
WEFH+B stateeach core system against peer distribution bandsnational edition
Couplingsthe national dependency matrixnational edition
Risk objectsthe national risk portfolionational edition
Capability rungsthe national capability laddernational edition
Evidence ageoldest and newest source datesnational source register

Editions in the 2026 Baseline programme

26national

countries and unions

10regional

clusters

16global

flagship and sector

14strategic

systems reports

20frontier

technology reports

How to read a country card

  • Each system is shown against the distribution of its peers, with thresholds where they exist
  • Couplings and risk objects come from the country’s own national edition
  • Capability rungs record evidence, not a judgement of institutions
  • Evidence age is printed, so older national data are visible as such
Table B.6National Baseline Editions in the 2026 programme
WaveCountries and unionsState
W0CanadaISSUED
W1United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, European Union, SwitzerlandPLANNED
W2Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Türkiye, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, Senegal, Kenya, African Union, India, China, Republic of Korea, Indonesia, Singapore, AustraliaPLANNED

B.6Licences

Table B.7Licences of each kind of material
MaterialLicence
TextCC BY 4.0
Dataon the licence of each source; Nexus tables CC BY 4.0
FiguresNexus figures CC BY 4.0; third-party as credited
Mapsboundary source and licence printed on each plate
MetadataCC0 1.0, as Zenodo publishes it
Third-party data, figures and textThe source’s own licence, credited where it is used; never relicensed
Nexus-authored text, tables and figures: CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0). Map plates print their boundary source and licence.

B.7Formats and provenance

Table B.8This edition in every format
FormatKindStateWhat it isIdentifier
Web editionHTMLOn this siteDraft in stewardship review; every value resolves to its source.NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Print editionPDFAt releaseA4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF, signed with the web edition at release.NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Indicator dataCSV · JSONOn this site19 indicators with unit, year, status and source; the machine-readable copy ships with the evidence bundle at release.NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE data release v1
FiguresSVG · PNGOn this site4 on the web edition: headline figure, figure 1.3, coupling instrument, capability ladder.FIG-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-*
SlidesPDFNot recordedNo slide deck is recorded for this edition.
Evidence briefHTML · PDFNot recordedNo evidence brief is recorded for this edition.
Dataset with DOIDataCiteAt releaseConcept and version DOI are minted at deposit; none is recorded yet.

Provenance

Edition pack
The edition’s content pack (JSON), from which the print and web editions are built
Evidence cut
DC-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-B0, closed 30 September 2026
Reproducibility
sourced values cited; analytical values reproducible from stated parameters
Self-check
14 of 23 at evidence close; a fail on any item blocks release
Review
five passes scheduled before release
Publisher of record
GCRI for the Nexus Consortium
Corrections
Registry correction pathway; upheld corrections are published as notices with a new version

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, WMO-No. 1391. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, March 2026.back
  2. 41WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2024, WMO-No. 1368. WMO, Geneva, 2025.back
  3. 40WMO (ed.), “WMO confirms 2025 was one of warmest years on record.” Press release. WMO, Geneva, January 2026.back
  4. 3UNEP (ed.), Emissions Gap Report 2024: No more hot air … please! UNEP, Nairobi, 2024.back
  5. 4International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Energy Review 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  6. 5International Energy Agency (ed.), Energy and AI. World Energy Outlook Special Report. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  7. 2Munich Re (ed.), Natural disasters in 2025: NatCatSERVICE full-year figures. Munich Re, Munich, January 2026.back
  8. 7FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (eds.), The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025. FAO, Rome, 2025.back
  9. 8WHO and UNICEF (eds.), Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000–2022. Joint Monitoring Programme, New York and Geneva, 2023.back
  10. 14World Health Organization (ed.), “Ambient (outdoor) air pollution” and “Household air pollution” fact sheets. WHO, Geneva, retrieved 2026-09-30.back
  11. 9WWF (ed.), Living Planet Report 2024: A System in Peril. WWF, Gland, 2024.back
  12. 10UNEP-WCMC and IUCN (eds.), Protected Planet Report 2024. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, Cambridge and Gland, 2024.back
  13. 11UN DESA Population Division (ed.), World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results. United Nations, New York, 2024.back
  14. 12UNHCR (ed.), Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2024. UNHCR, Copenhagen, June 2025.back
  15. 13UNCTAD (ed.), A World of Debt 2025: It Is Time for Reform. UNCTAD, Geneva, 2025.back
  16. 44International Labour Organization (ed.), World Social Protection Report 2024–26: Universal Social Protection for Climate Action and a Just Transition. ILO, Geneva, 2024.back
  17. 36International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  18. 15H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.), Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. IPCC, Geneva, 2023.back
  19. 38UNESCO World Water Assessment Programme (ed.), The United Nations World Water Development Report 2024: Water for Prosperity and Peace. UNESCO, Paris, 2024.back
  20. 26M. Romanello et al., “The 2024 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change,” The Lancet, vol. 404, pp. 1847–1896, 2024.back
  21. 35WMO and UNDRR (eds.), Global Status of Multi-Hazard Early Warning Systems 2024. WMO and UNDRR, Geneva, 2024.back

References and record

Every source the edition rests on, the publication record, the corrections log and the open record.

11 min read0 figures1 table0 notesNR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

C.148 sources

NR-CIT-1, editor first. A DOI is linked where the source has one; Nexus records carry a UNI once the catalogue allocates it (NS-1).

  1. 1WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, WMO-No. 1391. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, March 2026. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  2. 2Munich Re (ed.), Natural disasters in 2025: NatCatSERVICE full-year figures. Munich Re, Munich, January 2026. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  3. 3UNEP (ed.), Emissions Gap Report 2024: No more hot air … please! UNEP, Nairobi, 2024. Cited in the summary, chapter 2, chapter 4, chapter 6
  4. 4International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Energy Review 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025. Cited in the summary, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  5. 5International Energy Agency (ed.), Energy and AI. World Energy Outlook Special Report. IEA, Paris, 2025. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 7
  6. 6Ember (ed.), Global Electricity Review 2025. Ember, London, 2025. Cited in the summary, chapter 3, chapter 6
  7. 7FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (eds.), The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025. FAO, Rome, 2025. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  8. 8WHO and UNICEF (eds.), Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000–2022. Joint Monitoring Programme, New York and Geneva, 2023. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6
  9. 9WWF (ed.), Living Planet Report 2024: A System in Peril. WWF, Gland, 2024. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6
  10. 10UNEP-WCMC and IUCN (eds.), Protected Planet Report 2024. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, Cambridge and Gland, 2024. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6
  11. 11UN DESA Population Division (ed.), World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results. United Nations, New York, 2024. Cited in the summary, chapter 3, chapter 6
  12. 12UNHCR (ed.), Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2024. UNHCR, Copenhagen, June 2025. Cited in the summary, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  13. 13UNCTAD (ed.), A World of Debt 2025: It Is Time for Reform. UNCTAD, Geneva, 2025. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  14. 14World Health Organization (ed.), “Ambient (outdoor) air pollution” and “Household air pollution” fact sheets. WHO, Geneva, retrieved 2026-09-30. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6
  15. 15H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.), Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. IPCC, Geneva, 2023. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  16. 16P. D. McElwee, P. A. Harrison, T. L. van Huysen et al. (eds.), Thematic Assessment Report on the Interlinkages among Biodiversity, Water, Food and Health. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054 Cited in chapter 1, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  17. 17K. O’Brien, L. Garibaldi and A. Agrawal (eds.), Thematic Assessment Report on the Underlying Causes of Biodiversity Loss and the Determinants of Transformative Change. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, 2024. Cited in chapter 6, chapter 8
  18. 18UNDRR (ed.), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025: Resilience Pays. UNDRR, Geneva, 2025. Cited in the summary, chapter 2, chapter 6
  19. 19World Economic Forum (ed.), Global Risks Report 2026, 21st edition. WEF, Cologny/Geneva, 2026.
  20. 20K. Richardson, W. Steffen, W. Lucht et al., “Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries,” Science Advances, vol. 9, eadh2458, 2023. Cited in the summary, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  21. 21T. M. Lenton, D. I. Armstrong McKay, S. Loriani et al. (eds.), The Global Tipping Points Report 2023. University of Exeter, Exeter, 2023. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  22. 22J. Zscheischler, S. Westra, B. J. J. M. van den Hurk et al., “Future climate risk from compound events,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 8, pp. 469–477, 2018. Cited in chapter 6
  23. 23F. Gaupp, J. Hall, S. Hochrainer-Stigler and S. Dadson, “Changing risks of simultaneous global breadbasket failure,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 10, pp. 54–57, 2020. Cited in the summary, chapter 5, chapter 6, chapter 8
  24. 24M. Lawrence, T. Homer-Dixon, S. Janzwood, J. Rockström, O. Renn and J. F. Donges, “Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement,” Global Sustainability, vol. 7, e6, 2024. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 6, chapter 8
  25. 25S. V. Buldyrev, R. Parshani, G. Paul, H. E. Stanley and S. Havlin, “Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks,” Nature, vol. 464, pp. 1025–1028, 2010.
  26. 26M. Romanello et al., “The 2024 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change,” The Lancet, vol. 404, pp. 1847–1896, 2024. Cited in chapter 6, chapter 8
  27. 27World Health Assembly (ed.), WHO Pandemic Agreement, resolution WHA78.1. WHO, Geneva, May 2025. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6
  28. 28World Health Assembly (ed.), Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005), resolution WHA77.17. WHO, Geneva, June 2024. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  29. 29UNFCCC (ed.), Paris Agreement. United Nations, Paris, 2015. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  30. 30Convention on Biological Diversity (ed.), Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, Decision 15/4. CBD Secretariat, Montreal, 2022. Cited in chapter 6
  31. 31UNDRR (ed.), Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. UNDRR, Geneva, 2015. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  32. 32United Nations (ed.), Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. United Nations, New York, 2023. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 6
  33. 33International Sustainability Standards Board (ed.), IFRS S1 General Requirements and IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures. IFRS Foundation, London, 2023. Cited in chapter 6
  34. 34European Parliament and Council of the European Union (eds.), Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal L, 12 July 2024, as amended. Cited in chapter 6
  35. 35WMO and UNDRR (eds.), Global Status of Multi-Hazard Early Warning Systems 2024. WMO and UNDRR, Geneva, 2024. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 4, chapter 8
  36. 36International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 4, chapter 6
  37. 37Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (ed.), Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2025. Stanford HAI, Stanford, 2025. Cited in chapter 3
  38. 38UNESCO World Water Assessment Programme (ed.), The United Nations World Water Development Report 2024: Water for Prosperity and Peace. UNESCO, Paris, 2024.
  39. 39Copernicus Climate Change Service (ed.), Global Climate Highlights 2024. ECMWF, Reading, January 2025. Cited in chapter 4
  40. 40WMO (ed.), “WMO confirms 2025 was one of warmest years on record.” Press release. WMO, Geneva, January 2026. Cited in the summary
  41. 41WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2024, WMO-No. 1368. WMO, Geneva, 2025. Cited in the summary, chapter 6, chapter 8
  42. 42UNEP (ed.), Adaptation Gap Report 2024: Come Hell and High Water. UNEP, Nairobi, 2024. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  43. 43World Bank Group (ed.), Poverty, Prosperity, and Planet Report 2024: Pathways Out of the Polycrisis. World Bank, Washington, DC, 2024.
  44. 44International Labour Organization (ed.), World Social Protection Report 2024–26: Universal Social Protection for Climate Action and a Just Transition. ILO, Geneva, 2024. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  45. 45S. Valadbaygi (ed.), Reports, The Foundational Edition, Volumes I and II. Reports series, Edition 2026–2030, V1.0. GCRI for the Nexus Consortium, Toronto, 2026.
  46. 46S. Valadbaygi (ed.), Canada Systems Risk & Resilience Report 2026, Baseline Edition. GCRI for the Nexus Consortium, Toronto, 2026. NR-COUNTRY-CAN-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0.
  47. 47J. Rockström, J. Gupta, D. Qin et al., “Safe and just Earth system boundaries,” Nature, vol. 619, pp. 102–111, 2023. Cited in chapter 6, chapter 8
  48. 48World Bank Group (ed.), Poverty, Prosperity, and Planet Report 2024: Pathways Out of the Polycrisis, extreme-poverty estimates. World Bank, Washington, DC, 2024.

C.2Publication record

Publication

Title
Strategic Systems Report 2026, Global Polycrisis and Cascading Systems Risk, Baseline Edition
Series
Reports · Strategic Systems Series SR-01
Edition
Baseline Edition 2026 · inaugural annual
Version
v1.0.0 · draft for stewardship review
Publication ID
NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Evidence close
30 September 2026
Publication date
October 2026
DOI
concept and version DOI at deposit

Publisher

Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), for the Nexus Consortium
Place
Toronto
Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor
Stewards
GCRI · technical truth · GRF · public meaning · GRA · capital meaning
Licence
text CC BY 4.0; data on the terms of each source
Copyright
© 2026 GCRI · Nexus Consortium
Language
English (en-GB) source edition
Correspondence
Registry correction pathway · editorial office

Colophon

Format
A4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF
Typefaces
Space Grotesk (display) · Geist (text) · IBM Plex Sans Italic (standfirsts) · IBM Plex Mono (data)
Design standard
Reports Foundational Edition, Volume I, Part VII
Accessibility
tagged PDF and HTML targets; text alternatives for every figure
Production
Reports editorial team, GCRI

Release path for this version

Table C.1Release path for this version
StepWhat happensWhen
Drafteditorial self-check complete at evidence closeOctober 2026
Steward reviewfive passes on the exact draft (keys T · M · F · N)Q4 2026
Approvalpublication authority approves the exact digestbefore release
Depositconcept and version DOI minted; registry pointer setat release
Successionthe 2027 polycrisis edition reports changes against this baseline2027
Current version
v1.0.0 draft, stewardship review
Previous edition
none, first edition of the series
Next edition
NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2027-v1.0.0
Latest version
resolve the concept DOI or the registry record
Correction route
Registry correction pathway
Notice types
erratum · addendum · supersession · withdrawal

C.3Corrections log

0correction notices. No edition has been released yet, so none can be corrected; the log below lists each edition’s current version.

EditionVersionDateStateChangeNotice
SR-01NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0October 2026DraftBaseline Edition 2026, inaugural annual edition,None

Notice types: erratum, addendum, supersession, withdrawal. A correction is a new version with a published notice; the earlier version stays resolvable, and no edition is ever edited in silence.

C.4Open record

This edition’s open record

Publication ID
NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Series alias
NR-STR-SR-01-2026-BL
DOI
Concept and version DOI at deposit, on Zenodo with DataCite metadata
Versions
Each correction is a new version (isNewVersionOf); the concept DOI resolves to the latest
Bundle
RO-Crate 1.2 with CITATION.cff, CodeMeta and PROV-O provenance; a signed manifest
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0) for original material; metadata CC0 1.0

Credit and identity

ORCID
Your iD in the deposit and the contribution record; DataCite can then add the work to your ORCID record
ROR
Your organisation by its ROR identifier, never by a typed name alone
CRediT
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualisation, Writing, review and editing
Account
None needed to contribute; never a password

Find and follow

Search the open indexes for Global Polycrisis; software is cited by its SWHID from Software Heritage, and a quantified scenario run is preregistered on OSF before it is run. Annotation is your choice: Hypothesis opens this page in its own viewer.

Mirrors and harvest

The DOI is canonical. At release each signed bundle is also given an IPFS content identifier and a bloxberg anchor as mirrors; both are listed in the record once they exist. Zenodo exposes every record over OAI-PMH, and reviews and endorsements can arrive through COAR Notify where the repository supports it.

InvenioRDM metadata for a contribution on Global Polycrisis, prefilled from this page
{
  "metadata": {
    "resource_type": {
      "id": "dataset"
    },
    "title": "Evidence on Global Polycrisis for Nexus Reports",
    "publication_date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
    "creators": [
      {
        "person_or_org": {
          "type": "personal",
          "family_name": "Your family name",
          "given_name": "Your given name",
          "identifiers": [
            {
              "scheme": "orcid",
              "identifier": "0000-0000-0000-0000"
            }
          ]
        },
        "affiliations": [
          {
            "id": "ROR identifier of your organisation"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "description": "What it is, where its record is kept and how it bears on Strategic Systems Report 2026: Global Polycrisis and Cascading Systems Risk.",
    "rights": [
      {
        "id": "cc-by-4.0"
      }
    ],
    "subjects": [
      {
        "subject": "Nexus Reports"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Global Polycrisis"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Strategic Systems Report · SR-01"
      }
    ],
    "related_identifiers": [
      {
        "identifier": "https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/editions/sr-01/",
        "scheme": "url",
        "relation_type": {
          "id": "issupplementto"
        },
        "resource_type": {
          "id": "publication-report"
        }
      }
    ],
    "version": "1.0.0"
  },
  "custom_fields": {},
  "access": {
    "record": "public",
    "files": "public"
  },
  "files": {
    "enabled": true
  },
  "parent": {
    "communities": {
      "default": "nexusreports"
    }
  }
}

C.5Where this edition sits among the six pillars

Foundry seals the evidence and Universe tests it; Reports publishes it; Standards takes its corrections and Academy teaches from it.

  1. F03 Sealed observations and indicator series Foundry Sealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
  2. F04 After-action and scenario findings for Universe After-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
  3. F05 National Portfolio movement for chapter Foundry National Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
  4. Applied in editions Standards Nexus Standards: applied in editions.
  5. SR-01 edition Reports Global Polycrisis 2026, published in every format with its sources, citation and corrections.
  6. F06 Method and correction findings as change Standards Method and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
  7. F12 Q4 synthesis informs the next-year Universe Q4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
  8. Taught in the open Academy Risk Academy: taught in the open.

What Foundry and Universe hand to this edition, and what it hands to Standards, Universe and Academy. From the programme spine; SR-01 is a drafted Baseline Edition, so these handoffs run from its first operational quarter.

HandoffBetweenWhat crosses, and when
F03Foundry to ReportsSealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
F04Universe to ReportsAfter-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
F05Foundry to ReportsNational Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
RingNexus Standards to ReportsNexus Standards: applied in editions.
F06Reports to Nexus StandardsMethod and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
F12Reports to UniverseQ4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
RingReports to Risk AcademyRisk Academy: taught in the open.
ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Global Polycrisis.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRIStrategic Systems
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Support our work

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.