Nexus Reports · The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation · Baseline Edition 2026

Nexus Strategic Systems Report · SR-01

Global Polycrisis 2026

How crises become entangled, common causes, domino effects and feedbacks across climate, food, energy, finance, health and conflict, at the 2026 baseline

Findings
12
each with its status and source
Sources
48
NR-CIT-1
Evidence close
30 September 2026
DC-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Status
Draft
in stewardship review

The record

The edition, its identifiers and its stewards.

NEXUS REPORTS SR-01 Strategic systems Global Polycrisis Baseline Edition 2026 How crises become entangled, common causes, domino effects and feedbacks across climate, food, energy, finance, health and conflict, at the 2026 baseline NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0 In stewardship review W0
Publication ID
NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Series alias
NR-STR-SR-01-2026-BL
Evidence cut
DC-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Evidence close
30 September 2026
DOI
concept and version DOI at deposit
Licence
CC BY 4.0 for Nexus material
  • Baseline Edition 2026
  • Strategic Systems Series
  • Public-safe edition
  • ◌ Draft in stewardship review
  1. TThe Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI)Publisher of record · technical truth · US / Canada
  2. MThe Global Risk Forum (GRF)Public meaning · legitimacy · Switzerland
  3. FThe Global Risk Alliance (GRA)Capital meaning · finance readiness · United States

About this edition

What this edition is, and is not.

The first annual edition of the polycrisis report. It fixes the 2026 reference state of entangled global risk, and the model, voice and positions, against which the 2027 edition and every strategic report will be read.

What this edition is

A question-led baseline: how crises in climate, food, energy, finance, health and conflict become entangled through common causes, domino effects and feedbacks. It reads the same global evidence as the global edition, through the mechanisms that connect it.

What it is not

Not a list of crises, a prediction of collapse, a ranking of threats or countries, or a policy recommendation. It states where the scientific community disagrees before stating what this edition concludes.

What comes next

National, regional and sector evidence binds each mechanism in 2027. Each edition reports what changed against this baseline, new observations, source revisions, method changes, scenario updates and corrections.

Abstract and decision surface

The edition on one page.

Abstract

The world in 2026 faces crises that are entangled rather than additive. Researchers identify three causal mechanisms: common causes that stress several systems at once, domino effects that carry a shock from one system to the next, and feedbacks between systems that amplify both [24]. The 2026 evidence shows all three. Warming at 1.43 °C in 2025, after a record 1.55 °C in 2024, is a common cause across water, food, health and nature [1]. Natural-disaster losses of US$224 billion in 2025, half of them uninsured, move through household balance sheets and public budgets [2], where 3.4 billion people already live in countries that spend more on interest than on health or education [13]. About 673 million people faced hunger in 2024 [7] and 123.2 million were forcibly displaced [12]. Six of nine planetary boundaries are transgressed [20]. This Baseline Edition maps the mechanisms, fixes the reference state, and sets the questions the 2027 edition will test. It forecasts no collapse and ranks no threat.

  • systemic risk
  • polycrisis
  • WEFH+B nexus
  • global baseline 2026
  • compound hazards
  • protection gap
  • planetary boundaries

Headline finding

Insurers covered about 48% of the US$224 billion in natural-disaster losses in 2025, about 70% in North America, about half in Europe, about 12% in Asia and under a fifth in Africa.

Headline figureNatural-disaster losses in 2025 (US$ billion)
Insured108Uninsured116

Source: Munich Re NatCatSERVICE 2025 [2]; the uninsured share is the difference between overall and insured losses.

Implication

The protection gap is widest where exposure is growing fastest and fiscal space is thinnest. Uninsured losses become household debt, delayed reconstruction and pressure on public budgets, which feed back into vulnerability before the next event [2] [13] [18].

At a glance

Six readings and the questions this edition answers.

Six readings that frame the global baseline, and the eight questions this edition answers, each with its status and source.

8.2billionpeople, 2024 [11]
1.55°Crecord year, 2024 [41]
423.9ppmCO₂ concentration, 2024 [1]
57.1Gt CO₂eGHG emissions, 2023 [3]
123.2millionforcibly displaced, end-2024 [12]
102US$ tnpublic debt, 2024 [13]
  1. How warm is the world?

    1.43 °C above 1850–1900 in 2025, after a record 1.55 °C in 2024; 2023–2025 averaged 1.48 °C. [1] [40]

    REPORTED

  2. Are disaster losses rising?

    Insured losses exceeded US$100 billion for the sixth year running; 2025 losses were driven by floods, storms and wildfires. [2]

    REPORTED

  3. Who carries the losses?

    Half of 2025 losses were uninsured; in Asia almost nine-tenths were. [2]

    REPORTED

  4. Are emissions falling?

    No: energy CO₂ set a record in 2024, although clean power supplied about 41% of electricity. [4] [6]

    REPORTED

  5. Is the food system stable?

    673 million people faced hunger in 2024; concurrent breadbasket failure is a rising tail risk. [7] [23]

    REPORTED

  6. How fast is nature changing?

    Wildlife populations fell by 73% on average from 1970 to 2020; six of nine planetary boundaries are transgressed. [9] [20]

    REPORTED

  7. What constrains the response?

    Debt service: 3.4 billion people live where interest outweighs health or education spending. [13]

    REPORTED

  8. What will 2027 test first?

    A concurrent breadbasket shortfall coinciding with an energy and fertiliser price shock. SCN-SR01-BBF-01

    EXPERT INPUT

Systems dashboard

Where each system stood at evidence close.

WATWater

People without safely managed drinking water

2.2billion

3.5 billion lacked safely managed sanitation in the same year.

REPORTED2022WHO/UNICEF JMP [8]

ENEEnergy

Energy-related CO₂ emissions

37.8Gt CO₂

A record high, up 0.8% on 2023, as demand grew faster than clean supply.

REPORTED2024IEA [4]

FOOFood

People facing hunger

673million

About 8.2% of the world population; 2.3 billion were moderately or severely food insecure.

REPORTED2024SOFI 2025 [7]

HLTHealth

Deaths each year from ambient and household air pollution

6.7million

Air pollution couples energy, cities and health more directly than any other pathway.

REPORTED2019–2020WHO [14]

BIOBiodiversity

Average decline of monitored wildlife populations

−73%

1970–2020. 17.6% of land and 8.4% of the ocean are protected, against 30% by 2030.

REPORTED1970–2020WWF [9] · [10]

SYSCross-system

Natural-disaster losses · insured

224 · 108US$ bn

The sixth year above US$100 billion insured; floods, storms and fires dominated.

REPORTED2025Munich Re [2]

Key findings

12 findings, grouped by system, never ranked.

Twelve findings carry the global baseline. They are grouped by system and never ranked. Each resolves to its source or, where Nexus analysis is involved, to its stated method.

StatusREPORTEDEXPERT INPUT

CLIClimate forcing

  1. Global temperature was 1.43 ± 0.13 °C above 1850–1900 in 2025, after a record 1.55 °C in 2024; 2015–2025 are the eleven warmest years. [1]

  2. Six of nine planetary boundaries were assessed as transgressed in 2023, and five major tipping systems are at risk at current warming. [20] [21]

FINFinance

  1. Natural disasters caused US$224 billion in losses in 2025, of which US$108 billion (48%) was insured. [2]

  2. Insured shares differ sharply by region: about 70% in North America, about half in Europe, about 12% in Asia and under a fifth in Africa (2025). [2]

  3. Public debt reached US$102 trillion in 2024; 3.4 billion people live in countries that spend more on interest than on health or education. [13]

ENEEnergy

  1. Energy-related CO₂ emissions reached a record 37.8 Gt in 2024; total greenhouse-gas emissions were 57.1 Gt CO₂e in 2023. [3] [4]

  2. Data centres used about 415 TWh of electricity in 2024, about 1.5% of the world total, with use projected to roughly double by 2030. [5]

FOOFood

  1. About 673 million people faced hunger in 2024, and 2.3 billion were moderately or severely food insecure. [7]

WATWater

  1. 2.2 billion people lacked safely managed drinking water and 3.5 billion lacked safely managed sanitation in 2022. [8]

HLTHealth

  1. Ambient and household air pollution together cause about 6.7 million deaths a year. [14]

BIOBiodiversity

  1. Monitored wildlife populations declined by 73% on average between 1970 and 2020; 17.6% of land and 8.4% of the ocean are protected. [9] [10]

SYSSystemic

  1. The leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is a concurrent breadbasket shortfall coinciding with an energy and fertiliser price shock. § scenario

Part I · lead chapter

Crises are entangled, not stacked

Polycrisis is often used as a mood. This edition uses it as a model. Lawrence and co-authors define three mechanisms through which crises become entangled: common causes that stress several systems at once, domino effects that carry a shock from one system to the next, and inter-systemic feedbacks that amplify both [24]. Each can be observed, and each can be tested.

The forcing layer is moving fast. 2024 was the warmest year on record at 1.55 °C above the late nineteenth century, and 2025 the second or third warmest at 1.43 °C; the eleven years 2015–2025 are the eleven warmest observed. Earth’s energy imbalance and ocean heat content reached record highs in 2025, which means the system is still gaining heat [1].

Losses follow, but unevenly. Natural disasters caused US$224 billion in losses in 2025, and insured losses exceeded US$100 billion for the sixth year running. No major hurricane struck the United States mainland; the total was driven by floods, severe storms and wildfires, led by the Los Angeles fires at about US$53 billion [2]. Frequency, not one peak event, now sets the global loss record.

Who pays depends on where the hazard lands. Insurers covered about 70% of losses in North America but about 12% in Asia and under a fifth in Africa [2]. Where cover is thin, losses fall on households and on public budgets that are already stretched: 3.4 billion people live in countries that spend more on interest than on health or education [13].

Beneath the losses, the core systems are already under strain. About 673 million people faced hunger in 2024 [7], 2.2 billion lacked safely managed drinking water [8], air pollution kills about 6.7 million people a year [14], and monitored wildlife populations have fallen by 73% on average since 1970 [9]. Each of these is coupled to the others through land, water and energy [16].

New couplings are forming at the frontier. Data centres used about 415 TWh of electricity in 2024, about 1.5% of the world total, and their use is projected to roughly double by 2030 [5]. The minerals behind batteries, grids and chips are refined in very few places: the top three refining countries hold, on average, about 86% of supply for key energy minerals [36]. Technology risk is therefore also energy, water and supply-chain risk.

Capabilities have grown, but unevenly. 108 countries reported multi-hazard early-warning systems in 2024, more than twice as many as in 2015 [35], and just over half of the world’s people are now covered by at least one social-protection benefit [44]. Adaptation finance, however, falls short of need by an estimated US$187–359 billion a year [42].

This edition therefore reads global risk as a property of couplings rather than a ranking of threats. The dependency matrix, the risk objects, the capability ladder and the compound scenario that follow all ask the same two questions: where does a shock travel next, and who holds the capability to stop it?

FIG. 1.3 · FIG-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-01-003Where did 2025’s natural-disaster losses fall? Overall losses by region (US$ billion)
North America133Asia73Europe11Africa3

North America, including Central America and the Caribbean, carried the largest losses, and about 70% of them were insured. Asia’s losses were more than half as large, but only about US$9 billion was insured. Africa’s recorded losses were small in money terms but almost entirely uninsured [2].

93US$ bninsured in North America [2]
9US$ bninsured in Asia [2]
17,200deathsin natural disasters, 2025 [2]
166US$ bnfrom floods, storms and wildfires [2]

Dependency network

Twenty couplings between five systems.

The global matrix types the twenty couplings between the five core systems. Strengths are Nexus estimates from the cited assessments and analogue events; they set the starting graph that federation evidence will test in 2027.

Select a system

Each line is one coupling, weighted by the strength the edition assigns. Strengths are Nexus estimates from the cited evidence and analogue events.

From (row) to (column) · ◆ ESTIMATED
WATENEFOOHLTBIO
WAT Water·STRONGhydro · thermal coolingSTRONGirrigation · rain-fed yieldSTRONGsafe water · sanitationSTRONGflows · wetlands
ENE EnergyMODERATEpumping · desalination·STRONGfuel · fertiliser · cold chainSTRONGair pollution · coolingMODERATEland use · mining
FOO FoodSTRONG≈70% of withdrawalsWEAKbioenergy feedstock·STRONGnutrition · food safetySTRONGland conversion
HLT HealthWEAKworkforceWEAKworkforceMODERATElabour · disease·WEAKresidues
BIO BiodiversitySTRONGregulation · filtrationMODERATEbiomass · hydrologySTRONGpollination · soilsMODERATEzoonoses · medicines·

Transmission paths

  1. CLI → FOO → TRDheat and drought in several breadbaskets at once cut exports and raise pricesINFERRED 2010–2011 price spike
  2. ENE → FOOgas and fertiliser prices pass into food pricesREPORTED 2022 price shock
  3. CLI → WAT → ENEdrought cuts hydro and cooling water for thermal plantsINFERRED 2022 European drought
  4. BIO → HLTland-use change raises zoonotic spillover riskINFERRED IPBES nexus [16]
  5. FIN → alldebt service crowds out adaptation and recoveryREPORTED post-2022 debt stress [13]

Reinforcing loops · both directions rated strong

  1. WAT ⇄ FOOWater to food: irrigation · rain-fed yield. Food to water: ≈70% of withdrawals.ESTIMATED in 4 of 10 drafted editions
  2. WAT ⇄ BIOWater to biodiversity: flows · wetlands. Biodiversity to water: regulation · filtration.ESTIMATED in 10 of 10 drafted editions
  3. FOO ⇄ BIOFood to biodiversity: land conversion. Biodiversity to food: pollination · soils.ESTIMATED in 10 of 10 drafted editions

A shock entering either system of a loop returns amplified through the other. A causal-loop reading of the matrix (Sterman, Business Dynamics, 2000): structural, from estimated strengths, not a measured feedback.

Domain posture

Each domain read in words, not scored.

Each of the twelve coupled domains is read in words, not scored. The reading states where the global evidence points; the coupling column names the dependency that carries risk across systems and borders.

DomainPosture at baselineCouplingStatus
WAT2.2 billion people without safely managed drinking water; basin stress concentrated in arid and fast-growing regions.WAT → FOO irrigation · WAT → ENE coolingREPORTEDEQL 4
ENERecord energy CO₂ in 2024; clean power at about 41% of electricity; demand rising with cooling and compute.ENE ↔ WAT · ENE → FOO inputsREPORTEDEQL 5
FOO673 million people facing hunger; production concentrated in a few breadbaskets and exporters.FOO ← WAT, ENE · FOO → TRDREPORTEDEQL 4
HLTAir pollution and heat are the leading environmental health burdens; One Health risks persist.HLT ← CLI, ENE, BIOREPORTEDEQL 4
BIOWildlife populations down 73% since 1970; protection below 30% targets on land and sea.BIO → WAT, FOO · BIO ← land useREPORTEDEQL 4
CLI1.43 °C in 2025 after a record 1.55 °C; energy imbalance at a record high.forcing on all five systemsREPORTEDEQL 5
INFChokepoints in shipping, power and data networks concentrate exposure.INF → TRD, ENE, FOOINFERREDEQL 3
FINInsured losses above US$100 billion for six years; about half of losses uninsured; debt constrains response.FIN ← CLI · FIN → sovereignsREPORTEDEQL 4
DATCloud, cable and satellite dependencies are concentrated and only partly mapped.DAT → ENE, FIN, HLTEXPERT INPUTEQL 2
AICData centres used about 415 TWh in 2024; use projected to roughly double by 2030.AIC → ENE, WAT, MINREPORTEDEQL 3
MINRefining of key energy minerals concentrated: the top three refiners average about 86%.MIN → ENE transition, AICREPORTEDEQL 3
TRDTrade fragmentation and export restrictions raise transmission risk for food and minerals.TRD → all systemsINFERREDEQL 3

Sector screens

All sixteen global sectors are screened on the same grammar as every national edition, so later editions can say what changed. The evidence column describes coverage of the baseline evidence, not the performance of the sector.

CodeSectorBaseline evidenceExposure to watchEvidence coverage
GS-00Cross-systementangled crises; six of nine boundaries transgressed [20]compound and cascading shocksPARTIAL
GS-01Water2.2 billion without safely managed water [8]drought and flood extremesGOOD
GS-02Energyrecord CO₂; about 41% clean power [4] [6]heat demand; mineral concentrationGOOD
GS-03Food and agrifood673 million facing hunger [7]concurrent breadbasket failureGOOD
GS-04Health6.7 million air-pollution deaths a year [14]heat, pandemics, antimicrobial resistancePARTIAL
GS-05Finance and economyUS$102 trillion public debt [13]debt distress after disastersGOOD
GS-06Development123.2 million forcibly displaced [12]conflict–climate compoundingPARTIAL
GS-07Climate1.43 °C in 2025 [1]extremes and tipping riskGOOD
GS-08DisasterUS$224 billion losses in 2025 [2]frequency of medium eventsGOOD
GS-09Infrastructurechokepoint concentrationshipping, power and cable outagesPARTIAL
GS-10Citiesmost people now live in cities [11]urban heat and floodingPARTIAL
GS-11Biodiversity−73% wildlife populations [9]land-use change and fireGOOD
GS-12Earth observationstrong global observing systemscontinuity of key missionsPARTIAL
GS-13Cyber and digitalconcentrated cloud and network dependencesystemic outagesTHIN
GS-14Policy and institutionsnew pandemic and ocean agreements [27] [32]implementation and finance gapsPARTIAL
GS-15Science and engineeringdeep research base; AI adoption rising [37]translation and dual useTHIN

Risk portfolio

Risk objects, read across the chain.

Four global risk objects open the portfolio. Order carries no rank. Each is read across driver, exposure, vulnerability, capacity, cascade and consequence; loss metrics are added only where they can be modelled.

INFERREDEQL 3RSK-SR01-FOO-001

Concurrent breadbasket shortfall

Driver
heat and drought in several producing regions in one season
Exposure
import-dependent countries; low-income households
Vulnerability
concentrated exports; thin stocks; price-sensitive diets
Capacity
trade openness; reserves; social protection
Cascade
CLI → FOO → TRD → HLT
Horizon
seasonal · 1 and 5 years

REPORTEDEQL 4RSK-SR01-FIN-002

Uninsured losses where cover is thin

Driver
rising frequency of floods, storms and fires
Exposure
Asia, Africa, small island states
Vulnerability
low insurance; limited fiscal space [13]
Capacity
sovereign and parametric cover; development finance
Cascade
CLI → FIN → households, sovereigns
Horizon
annual

REPORTEDEQL 3RSK-SR01-MIN-003

Concentration in critical-mineral refining

Driver
rising demand for transition and compute minerals
Exposure
battery, grid and chip supply chains
Vulnerability
top three refiners average about 86% [36]
Capacity
stockpiles; recycling; diversification
Cascade
MIN → ENE, AIC → FIN
Horizon
1–5 years

INFERREDEQL 3RSK-SR01-CLI-004

Crossing of Earth-system tipping points

Driver
continued warming above 1.5 °C
Exposure
coasts, coral reefs, monsoon and polar systems
Vulnerability
irreversibility once thresholds are crossed
Capacity
emission cuts; monitoring; adaptation
Cascade
CLI → BIO, WAT → all
Horizon
10 years and beyond

Capability ladder

Existence is not readiness.

Existence is not readiness. Each of the fifteen capability functions is placed on the ladder by the strongest public evidence at the global level, from a policy listing to performance in real events.

  1. Prevention and mitigationEXISTSParis and Sendai frameworks; emissions still rising [3] [29] [31]
  2. Monitoring and observationDEMONSTRATEDglobal observing systems underpin WMO and C3S records [1] [39]
  3. Early warningEXISTS108 countries reported multi-hazard early-warning systems in 2024 [35]
  4. Preparedness and planningEXISTSnational adaptation plans uneven; adaptation finance gap of US$187–359 billion a year [42]
  5. Redundancy and reservesLISTEDno coordinated global food or mineral reserve
  6. ResponseDEMONSTRATEDinternational humanitarian response in real events; chronically underfunded
  7. Continuity of critical servicesEXISTSsector-level plans; limited cross-border testing
  8. RecoveryEXISTSdevelopment finance and debt relief instruments
  9. AdaptationEXISTSplans widespread; finance below need [42]
  10. Social protectionEXISTS52.4% of people covered by at least one benefit [44]
  11. Finance and insuranceEXISTSdeep markets in some regions; about half of losses uninsured [2]
  12. Institutional coordinationEXISTSnew pandemic agreement and IHR amendments [27] [28]
  13. Technical infrastructureEXISTSglobal networks concentrated in few chokepoints
  14. WorkforceLISTEDhealth and emergency workforce shortages widely reported
  15. Research capacityADEQUATEIPCC and IPBES assessments; translation uneven [15] [16]

Ladder: LISTED, EXISTS, DEMONSTRATED, TESTED. A capability listed in policy is not a tested one; each rung is the strongest public evidence at baseline.

Scenario · SCN-SR01-BBF-01

Concurrent breadbasket shortfall and energy price shock

A conditional statement under stated assumptions, never a prediction.

Assumptions

Baseline
the 2026 reference state in this edition
Drivers
heat and drought across two or more major grain-exporting regions in one season, while gas and fertiliser prices spike
Analogues
2007–2008 and 2010–2011 food price spikes; 2022 energy and fertiliser shock
Interventions
none modelled, the specification describes the unmitigated case
Run state
narrative specification; quantified run scheduled for 2027 [23]

Cascade, step by step

  1. 1CLI → FOOheat and drought cut yields in several exporters at once2010 · 2012
  2. 2ENE → FOOfertiliser and fuel costs raise production costs2022
  3. 3FOO → TRDexport restrictions amplify the price rise2008 · 2011
  4. 4TRD → HLTfood-price rises cut diets in import-dependent households2008
  5. 5FIN → sovereignsimport bills and subsidies widen deficits2022
  6. 6HLT → developmenthunger and displacement rise in fragile settings2011

Concurrent breadbasket shortfall and energy price shock

How the shock in scenario SCN-SR01-BBF-01 would travel through Global Polycrisis's coupled systems, step by step, under the assumptions the edition states.

Concurrent breadbasket shortfall and energy price shockHow the shock in scenario SCN-SR01-BBF-01 would travel through Global Polycrisis's coupled systems, step by step, under the assumptions the edition states.

Heat and drought cut yields in several exporters at once. Analogue or source: 2010 · 2012. Edition SR-01, scenario SCN-SR01-BBF-01, step 1

The cascade of scenario SCN-SR01-BBF-01 as a playable chain of couplings, one step at a time.

A teaching model of a conditional scenario under the edition's stated assumptions: not a forecast, not a prediction and not a warning.

Sources: Global Polycrisis 2026, scenario SCN-SR01-BBF-01 (2026); Global Polycrisis 2026, references (NR-CIT-1) (2026).

Three lenses

One edition, read by each steward.

The global baseline is read through each steward’s lens, then once as a whole. Each lens is a projection of reviewed findings, not a separate argument.

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports an entangled reading of global risk. Warming and losses set records in the same years; frequency, not one peak event, drives losses; and the five core systems share dependence on water, energy and land. Evidence is strongest for climate and losses, and weakest for digital dependencies and tipping proximity.

CLI-001 · FIN-002 · CLI-010 · SYS-012

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people global risk arrives as a price rise, a heat wave or a flood, and its burden depends on where they live. The baseline asks that public debate weigh the couplings and the distribution of losses, not a list of separate threats.

FIN-003 · FOO-006 · HLT-008

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. About half of disaster losses are uninsured, debt service crowds out adaptation, and climate disclosure standards are spreading [33]. These show where finance-readiness evidence will matter. Nothing here is advice, a rating or an approval.

FIN-002 · FIN-003 · FIN-011

NEXUS

Nexus Synthesis

The world’s crises share causes and channels. The 2027 programme should test the mechanisms rather than list the crises: bind the common causes, trace the dominoes through fiscal and food channels, and measure the feedbacks that make recovery slower than the next shock.

SYS-012 · P-01 · P-02

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation reading

Model card, Polycrisis System Model v0

Model ID
MDL-SR01-POLYCRISIS · v0.1
Purpose
represent the world as coupled water, energy, food, health and biodiversity systems with forcing and transmission layers
Family
graph-based system of systems
Inputs
the cited sources of this edition; no proprietary data
Method
expert-specified coupling strengths (STRONG · MODERATE · WEAK) from assessments and analogue events
Validation
none yet, first validation against federation evidence in 2027
Uncertainty
qualitative; strengths are hypotheses, not measurements
Domain of validity
global scale; not for country, regional or asset-level use
Reproducibility
strength table and sources published in this edition
20couplingstyped in v0
11strongdocumented within one season
5moderatedocumented, buffered
4weakplausible, undocumented

2027 agenda

The questions the operational series will answer.

Eight bounded questions open the 2027 polycrisis agenda. Each comes from a baseline finding, names the initiative that will carry it and the first output due in the 2027 polycrisis edition.

  1. P-01

    How likely is a simultaneous shortfall across major breadbaskets at 1.5–2 °C, and which import-dependent countries are most exposed?

    INI-SR01-FOO-01 · breadbasket concurrency · first output: concurrency model and exposure register

  2. P-02

    Where does the uninsured share of disaster losses land, by region, peril and income group?

    INI-SR01-FIN-02 · global protection-gap atlas · first output: region-by-peril loss table, 2015–2025

  3. P-03

    How do AI compute demand, power systems, water and critical-mineral refining constrain one another?

    INI-SR01-TEC-03 · compute–power–minerals nexus · first output: demand and concentration map

  4. P-04

    Which tipping systems are closest, and which indicators would give early warning?

    INI-SR01-CLI-04 · tipping indicators register · first output: indicator register with evidence grades

  5. P-05

    How does debt service constrain adaptation and recovery where hazard is highest?

    INI-SR01-FIN-05 · debt–adaptation constraint · first output: exposure–fiscal space matrix

  6. P-06

    How do heat and water stress couple through health, labour and food in the tropics?

    INI-SR01-HLT-06 · heat–water–labour · first output: regional heat–work exposure layer

  7. P-07

    Where do early-warning gaps coincide with high hazard and thin insurance?

    to be admitted in 2027 · first output: gap overlay with WMO and UNDRR data

  8. P-08

    How do conflict, displacement and climate hazards compound in fragile settings?

    to be admitted in 2027 · first output: scoping note

Portfolio proposed for the Q1 2027 alignment

Six initiatives and one Universe mission candidate are proposed for the 2027 global portfolio. They are programme objects, no partner, funder or member is attached to them in this edition.

IDObjectKindQuestionState
INI-SR01-FOO-01Breadbasket concurrency modelInitiativeP-01PROPOSED
INI-SR01-FIN-02Global protection-gap atlasInitiativeP-02PROPOSED
INI-SR01-TEC-03Compute–power–minerals nexusInitiativeP-03PROPOSED
INI-SR01-CLI-04Tipping indicators registerInitiativeP-04PROPOSED
INI-SR01-FIN-05Debt–adaptation constraintInitiativeP-05PROPOSED
INI-SR01-HLT-06Heat–water–labour exposureInitiativeP-06PROPOSED
MSN-SR01-2027-01Breadbasket–energy compound Universe missionMissionP-01CANDIDATE

The pathway

The global edition is the top of the Nexus federation. It does not collect its own evidence. It reads national, regional and sector editions through one governed evidence graph, so a correction made anywhere travels everywhere. At baseline the federation is designed and its first edition is issued.

  1. National Foundries

    continuous national evidence environments

    PREPARED · first sealed cuts in Q1 2027

  2. National Models and Portfolios

    each country as a system of systems

    CANADA v0 ISSUED · 25 further national baselines

  3. Quarterly national reports

    State & Agenda, Evidence, Stress Test, Annual

    BASELINE STAGE · Q1 2027 opens the series

  4. Regional aggregation

    ten regional clusters

    10 PLANNED · regional baselines in 2026–2027

  5. Global sector and strategic models

    GS-01…15 · SR-01…14 · XT-01…20

    49 PLANNED · pilots: GS-01, SR-01, XT-01

  6. Nexus Universe

    annual proving environment

    CANDIDATE MISSION · global mandate in 2027

  7. Global Nexus Report

    this series

    BASELINE ISSUED · 2027 annual edition

  8. Evidence and correction

    one graph, many projections

    OPEN · first federation-wide correction cycle in 2027

System chapter

Common causes

A common cause stresses several systems at once. Warming is the clearest: one forcing that loads water, food, health and nature in the same years [1] [24].

1.43°Cwarming in 2025 [1]
6 of 9boundariestransgressed [20]
US$102trillionpublic debt, 2024 [13]

Evidence at baseline

InstanceMechanism in actionEvidenceStatus
Warming1.43 °C in 2025 after a record 1.55 °C; stress on all five core systems[1] [41]REPORTED
Energy pricesone price shock passes into food, fertiliser and household budgets[4]INFERRED
Land-use changedrives biodiversity loss, emissions and zoonotic risk together[16] [17]REPORTED
Interest ratesa rise tightens every indebted budget at once[13]INFERRED

Pathways in this mechanism

  • Warming loads water, food, health and nature together
  • One energy shock reaches food, fertiliser and budgets
  • Interest-rate rises tighten every indebted budget

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • Attribution of joint stress to each common cause
  • Timing of common shocks across regions
  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-01 Water
  • GS-03 Food
  • GS-05 Finance
  • SR-05 Fiscal resilience
  • SR-09 Planetary boundaries

System chapter

Domino effects

A domino effect carries a shock from one system to the next. Food and finance are the main channels at baseline.

673millionfacing hunger, 2024 [7]
123.2millionforcibly displaced, 2024 [12]
116US$ bnuninsured disaster losses, 2025 [2]

Evidence at baseline

InstanceMechanism in actionEvidenceStatus
Drought → food → pricesbreadbasket shortfalls transmitted through trade[23]REPORTED
Disaster → budgetsuninsured losses become public and household debt[2] [13]INFERRED
Prices → hungerfood-price rises cut diets in import-dependent households[7]REPORTED
Conflict → displacement123.2 million forcibly displaced at the end of 2024[12]REPORTED

Pathways in this mechanism

  • Breadbasket shortfall → prices → hunger
  • Disaster → uninsured losses → public debt
  • Conflict → displacement → host-country strain

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • Speed of price transmission to households
  • Fiscal cost of disasters by country group
  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-01 Water
  • GS-03 Food
  • GS-05 Finance
  • SR-05 Fiscal resilience
  • SR-09 Planetary boundaries

System chapter

Inter-systemic feedbacks

Feedbacks make crises reinforce each other: debt slows recovery, slow recovery deepens vulnerability, and vulnerability raises the cost of the next shock.

3.4billionwhere interest exceeds health or education [13]
US$187–359bn a yearadaptation finance gap [42]
+167%heat deaths of over-65s vs 1990s [26]

Evidence at baseline

InstanceMechanism in actionEvidenceStatus
Debt–disaster loopinterest costs crowd out adaptation, raising future losses[13] [42]INFERRED
Hunger–conflict loopfood insecurity and conflict reinforce each other[7] [12]INFERRED
Nature–climate loopecosystem loss weakens carbon and water regulation[16] [20]REPORTED
Heat–health–labour loopheat cuts work capacity and income[26]REPORTED

Pathways in this mechanism

  • Debt slows recovery; slow recovery raises the next loss
  • Hunger and conflict reinforce each other
  • Nature loss weakens climate and water regulation

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • Recovery times after major disasters
  • Strength of the debt–disaster loop by region
  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-01 Water
  • GS-03 Food
  • GS-05 Finance
  • SR-05 Fiscal resilience
  • SR-09 Planetary boundaries

System chapter

Shared vulnerabilities

Entanglement is worst where buffers are thinnest. Fiscal space, insurance cover and social protection decide whether a shock stays contained.

48%of 2025 disaster losses insured [2]
52.4%covered by social protection [44]
108countrieswith multi-hazard early warning [35]

Evidence at baseline

InstanceMechanism in actionEvidenceStatus
Fiscal space3.4 billion people where interest exceeds health or education spending[13]REPORTED
Insuranceabout half of 2025 losses uninsured; about 12% insured in Asia[2]REPORTED
Social protection52.4% of people covered by at least one benefit[44]REPORTED
Early warning108 countries with multi-hazard systems in 2024[35]REPORTED

Pathways in this mechanism

  • Thin buffers turn shocks into crises
  • Where insurance, protection and warning are all thin, losses compound
  • Buffers bought before the shock cost least

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • Overlap of hazard, debt and thin cover
  • Tested performance of buffers in real events
  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-01 Water
  • GS-03 Food
  • GS-05 Finance
  • SR-05 Fiscal resilience
  • SR-09 Planetary boundaries

System chapter

Thresholds and tipping

Some couplings change character past a threshold. Planetary boundaries and tipping systems mark where gradual stress can become abrupt change.

6 of 9boundariestransgressed, 2023 [20]
5systemstipping at risk at current warming [21]
record2025Earth energy imbalance [1]

Evidence at baseline

InstanceMechanism in actionEvidenceStatus
Planetary boundariessix of nine assessed as transgressed in 2023[20]REPORTED
Tipping systemsfive major systems at risk at current warming[21]REPORTED
Safe and just limitsboundaries defined for people as well as the planet[47]REPORTED
Energy imbalancerecord high in 2025; the system is still gaining heat[1]REPORTED

Pathways in this mechanism

  • Gradual stress can become abrupt change
  • Some tipping systems interact and may cascade
  • Thresholds shrink the time available to respond

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • Early-warning indicators for each tipping system
  • Interactions between tipping systems
  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-01 Water
  • GS-03 Food
  • GS-05 Finance
  • SR-05 Fiscal resilience
  • SR-09 Planetary boundaries

Process

How this edition is made, released and corrected.

Press play to run the release step by step in the five pillar lanes; select a step to read it.

How one quarterly edition reaches the open record

Every edition is built from a sealed evidence cut, reviewed under three keys, signed and deposited before any site shows it as published; corrections go to Nexus Standards as change proposals and feed the next cut.

How one quarterly edition reaches the open recordEvery edition is built from a sealed evidence cut, reviewed under three keys, signed and deposited before any site shows it as published; corrections go to Nexus Standards as change proposals and feed the next cut.

Nexus Foundry seals observations and indicator series, Nexus Universe hands over after-action and scenario findings, and contributions are screened at every gateway, including this site's.

The quarterly release in the five pillar lanes: what Foundry and Universe hand to Reports, what Reports seals, reviews, signs, deposits and publishes, and what returns to Standards.

A teaching model of the process, not a forecast and not a record of any run; dates and counts on this page come from the programme record.

Sources: Nexus Reports governance at GCRI Canada (2026); Zenodo, repository of record for Nexus Reports deposits (2026).

How a contribution reaches this edition, step by step, is on the contribute page and the front page of this site. Contribute

Open science

This edition's open record.

Identifiers, licences and the bundle at deposit; credit by ORCID, ROR and CRediT; the open indexes; and a deposit prefilled for a contribution to this edition.

This edition's open record

Publication ID
NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Series alias
NR-STR-SR-01-2026-BL
DOI
Concept and version DOI at deposit, on Zenodo with DataCite metadata
Versions
Each correction is a new version (isNewVersionOf); the concept DOI resolves to the latest
Bundle
RO-Crate 1.2 with CITATION.cff, CodeMeta and PROV-O provenance; a signed manifest
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0) for Nexus material; metadata CC0 1.0

Credit and identity

ORCID
Your iD in the deposit and the contribution record; DataCite can then add the work to your ORCID record
ROR
Your organisation by its ROR identifier, never by a typed name alone
CRediT
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing, review and editing
Account
None needed to contribute; never a password

Find and follow

Search the open indexes for Global Polycrisis; software is cited by its SWHID from Software Heritage, and a quantified scenario run is preregistered on OSF before it is run. Annotation is your choice: Hypothesis opens this page in its own viewer.

Mirrors and harvest

The DOI is canonical. At release each signed bundle is also given an IPFS content identifier and a bloxberg anchor as mirrors; both are listed in the record once they exist. Zenodo exposes every record over OAI-PMH, and reviews and endorsements can arrive through COAR Notify where the repository supports it.

InvenioRDM metadata for a contribution on Global Polycrisis, prefilled from this page
{
  "metadata": {
    "resource_type": {
      "id": "dataset"
    },
    "title": "Evidence on Global Polycrisis for Nexus Reports",
    "publication_date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
    "creators": [
      {
        "person_or_org": {
          "type": "personal",
          "family_name": "Your family name",
          "given_name": "Your given name",
          "identifiers": [
            {
              "scheme": "orcid",
              "identifier": "0000-0000-0000-0000"
            }
          ]
        },
        "affiliations": [
          {
            "id": "ROR identifier of your organisation"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "description": "What it is, where its record is kept and how it bears on Global Polycrisis 2026.",
    "rights": [
      {
        "id": "cc-by-4.0"
      }
    ],
    "subjects": [
      {
        "subject": "Nexus Reports"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Global Polycrisis"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Strategic Systems Report · SR-01"
      }
    ],
    "related_identifiers": [
      {
        "identifier": "https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/editions/sr-01/",
        "scheme": "url",
        "relation_type": {
          "id": "issupplementto"
        },
        "resource_type": {
          "id": "publication-report"
        }
      }
    ],
    "version": "1.0.0"
  },
  "custom_fields": {},
  "access": {
    "record": "public",
    "files": "public"
  },
  "files": {
    "enabled": true
  },
  "parent": {
    "communities": {
      "default": "nexus-reports-gcri"
    }
  }
}

Outputs

This edition in every format, with where it came from.

What is on this site now, what ships with the signed bundle at release, and what is not recorded for this edition; then the chain the outputs come from and how to cite each one.

FormatStateWhat it isIdentifier
Web editionHTMLOn this siteDraft in stewardship review; every value resolves to its source.NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Print editionPDFAt releaseA4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF, signed with the web edition at release.NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Indicator dataCSV · JSONOn this site19 indicators with unit, year, status and source; the machine-readable copy ships with the evidence bundle at release.NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE data release v1
FiguresSVG · PNGOn this site4 on the web edition: headline figure, figure 1.3, coupling instrument, capability ladder.FIG-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-*
SlidesPDFNot recordedNo slide deck is recorded for this edition.
Evidence briefHTML · PDFNot recordedNo evidence brief is recorded for this edition.
Dataset with DOIDataCiteAt releaseConcept and version DOI are minted at deposit; none is recorded yet.

Provenance

Edition pack
data/editions/SR-01.json, the content pack the print and web editions are built from
Evidence cut
DC-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-B0, closed 30 September 2026
Reproducibility
sourced values cited; analytical values reproducible from stated parameters
Self-check
14 of 23 at evidence close; a fail on any item blocks release
Review
five passes scheduled before release
Publisher of record
GCRI for the Nexus Consortium
Corrections
Nexus Registry correction pathway; upheld corrections are published as notices with a new version

Cite it

NR-CIT-1
S. Valadbaygi (ed.), Nexus Strategic Systems Report 2026, Global Polycrisis and Cascading Systems Risk, Baseline Edition. Nexus Reports series · Strategic Systems Series SR-01 · Baseline Edition 2026 · v1.0.0 · GCRI for the Nexus Consortium, Toronto, 2026 · NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0 · DOI at deposit
Short citation
Valadbaygi (ed.), Nexus Polycrisis Report 2026, Baseline Edition, NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE.
A finding
S. Valadbaygi (ed.), Nexus Polycrisis Report 2026, Baseline Edition, finding NRF-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-FIN-002, v1.0.0.
A figure
S. Valadbaygi (ed.), Nexus Polycrisis Report 2026, Baseline Edition, Figure n.m (FIG-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-CH-NNN), v1.0.0.
A data table
S. Valadbaygi (ed.), Polycrisis baseline indicator set 2026, NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE data release v1. GCRI, 2026.

Indicator data

Global baseline indicator set
IndicatorValueUnitYearStateSource
Global mean temperature above 1850–19001.43°C2025REPORTED[1]
Record year temperature1.55°C2024REPORTED[41]
Three-year average temperature1.48°C2023–2025REPORTED[40]
CO₂ concentration423.9ppm2024REPORTED[1]
Total GHG emissions57.1Gt CO₂e2023REPORTED[3]
Energy-related CO₂37.8Gt CO₂2024REPORTED[4]
Data-centre electricity use≈415TWh2024REPORTED[5]
Natural-disaster losses224US$ billion2025REPORTED[2]
Insured disaster losses108US$ billion2025REPORTED[2]
Disaster deaths17,200deaths2025REPORTED[2]
People facing hunger673million2024REPORTED[7]
Without safely managed water2.2billion2022REPORTED[8]
Air-pollution deaths6.7million a year2019–2020REPORTED[14]
Wildlife population change−73%1970–2020REPORTED[9]
Protected land · ocean17.6 · 8.4%2024REPORTED[10]
Population8.2billion2024REPORTED[11]
Forcibly displaced123.2million2024REPORTED[12]
Public debt102US$ trillion2024REPORTED[13]
Covered by social protection52.4%2023REPORTED[44]

Six pillars

Where this edition sits among the six pillars.

Nexus Foundry seals the evidence and Nexus Universe tests it; Nexus Reports publishes it; Nexus Standards takes its corrections and Risk Academy teaches from it.

Global Polycrisis 2026 among the six pillarsF03 Sealed observations and indicator series: Foundry; F04 After-action and scenario findings for: Universe; F05 National Portfolio movement for chapter: Foundry; Applied in editions: Standards; SR-01 edition: Reports; F06 Method and correction findings as change: Standards; F12 Q4 synthesis informs the next-year: Universe; Taught in the open: Academy
What Foundry and Universe hand to this edition, and what it hands to Standards, Universe and Academy. From the programme spine; SR-01 is a drafted Baseline Edition, so these handoffs run from its first operational quarter.
  1. F03 Sealed observations and indicator series Foundry Sealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
  2. F04 After-action and scenario findings for Universe After-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
  3. F05 National Portfolio movement for chapter Foundry National Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
  4. Applied in editions Standards Nexus Standards: applied in editions.
  5. SR-01 edition Reports Global Polycrisis 2026, published in every format with its sources, citation and corrections.
  6. F06 Method and correction findings as change Standards Method and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
  7. F12 Q4 synthesis informs the next-year Universe Q4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
  8. Taught in the open Academy Risk Academy: taught in the open.
HandoffBetweenWhat crosses, and when
F03Nexus Foundry to Nexus ReportsSealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
F04Nexus Universe to Nexus ReportsAfter-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
F05Nexus Foundry to Nexus ReportsNational Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
RingNexus Standards to Nexus ReportsNexus Standards: applied in editions.
F06Nexus Reports to Nexus StandardsMethod and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
F12Nexus Reports to Nexus UniverseQ4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
RingNexus Reports to Risk AcademyRisk Academy: taught in the open.

Corrections log

Versions and notices.

A correction is a new version with a published notice; the earlier version stays resolvable.

0correction notices. No edition has been released yet, so none can be corrected; the log below lists each edition's current version.

EditionVersionDateStateChangeNotice
SR-01NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0October 2026DraftBaseline Edition 2026, inaugural annual editionNone

Notice types: erratum, addendum, supersession, withdrawal. A correction is a new version with a published notice; the earlier version stays resolvable, and no edition is ever edited in silence.

References · NR-CIT-1

48 sources this edition rests on.

  1. [1]WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, WMO-No. 1391. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, March 2026.
  2. [2]Munich Re (ed.), Natural disasters in 2025: NatCatSERVICE full-year figures. Munich Re, Munich, January 2026.
  3. [3]UNEP (ed.), Emissions Gap Report 2024: No more hot air … please! UNEP, Nairobi, 2024.
  4. [4]International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Energy Review 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025.
  5. [5]International Energy Agency (ed.), Energy and AI. World Energy Outlook Special Report. IEA, Paris, 2025.
  6. [6]Ember (ed.), Global Electricity Review 2025. Ember, London, 2025.
  7. [7]FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (eds.), The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025. FAO, Rome, 2025.
  8. [8]WHO and UNICEF (eds.), Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000–2022. Joint Monitoring Programme, New York and Geneva, 2023.
  9. [9]WWF (ed.), Living Planet Report 2024: A System in Peril. WWF, Gland, 2024.
  10. [10]UNEP-WCMC and IUCN (eds.), Protected Planet Report 2024. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, Cambridge and Gland, 2024.
  11. [11]UN DESA Population Division (ed.), World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results. United Nations, New York, 2024.
  12. [12]UNHCR (ed.), Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2024. UNHCR, Copenhagen, June 2025.
  13. [13]UNCTAD (ed.), A World of Debt 2025: It Is Time for Reform. UNCTAD, Geneva, 2025.
  14. [14]World Health Organization (ed.), “Ambient (outdoor) air pollution” and “Household air pollution” fact sheets. WHO, Geneva, retrieved 2026-09-30.
  15. [15]H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.), Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. IPCC, Geneva, 2023.
  16. [16]P. D. McElwee, P. A. Harrison, T. L. van Huysen et al. (eds.), Thematic Assessment Report on the Interlinkages among Biodiversity, Water, Food and Health. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850054.
  17. [17]K. O’Brien, L. Garibaldi and A. Agrawal (eds.), Thematic Assessment Report on the Underlying Causes of Biodiversity Loss and the Determinants of Transformative Change. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, 2024.
  18. [18]UNDRR (ed.), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025: Resilience Pays. UNDRR, Geneva, 2025.
  19. [19]UNDRR (ed.), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025: Resilience Pays. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva, 2025.
  20. [20]K. Richardson, W. Steffen, W. Lucht et al., “Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries,” Science Advances, vol. 9, eadh2458, 2023.
  21. [21]T. M. Lenton, D. I. Armstrong McKay, S. Loriani et al. (eds.), The Global Tipping Points Report 2023. University of Exeter, Exeter, 2023.
  22. [22]J. Zscheischler, S. Westra, B. J. J. M. van den Hurk et al., “Future climate risk from compound events,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 8, pp. 469–477, 2018.
  23. [23]F. Gaupp, J. Hall, S. Hochrainer-Stigler and S. Dadson, “Changing risks of simultaneous global breadbasket failure,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 10, pp. 54–57, 2020.
  24. [24]M. Lawrence, T. Homer-Dixon, S. Janzwood, J. Rockström, O. Renn and J. F. Donges, “Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement,” Global Sustainability, vol. 7, e6, 2024.
  25. [25]S. V. Buldyrev, R. Parshani, G. Paul, H. E. Stanley and S. Havlin, “Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks,” Nature, vol. 464, pp. 1025–1028, 2010.
  26. [26]M. Romanello et al., “The 2024 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change,” The Lancet, vol. 404, pp. 1847–1896, 2024.
  27. [27]World Health Assembly (ed.), WHO Pandemic Agreement, resolution WHA78.1. WHO, Geneva, May 2025.
  28. [28]World Health Assembly (ed.), Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005), resolution WHA77.17. WHO, Geneva, June 2024.
  29. [29]UNFCCC (ed.), Paris Agreement. United Nations, Paris, 2015.
  30. [30]Convention on Biological Diversity (ed.), Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, Decision 15/4. CBD Secretariat, Montreal, 2022.
  31. [31]UNDRR (ed.), Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. UNDRR, Geneva, 2015.
  32. [32]United Nations (ed.), Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. United Nations, New York, 2023.
  33. [33]International Sustainability Standards Board (ed.), IFRS S1 General Requirements and IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures. IFRS Foundation, London, 2023.
  34. [34]European Parliament and Council of the European Union (eds.), Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal L, 12 July 2024, as amended.
  35. [35]WMO and UNDRR (eds.), Global Status of Multi-Hazard Early Warning Systems 2024. WMO and UNDRR, Geneva, 2024.
  36. [36]International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025.
  37. [37]Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (ed.), Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2025. Stanford HAI, Stanford, 2025.
  38. [38]UNESCO World Water Assessment Programme (ed.), The United Nations World Water Development Report 2024: Water for Prosperity and Peace. UNESCO, Paris, 2024.
  39. [39]Copernicus Climate Change Service (ed.), Global Climate Highlights 2024. ECMWF, Reading, January 2025.
  40. [40]WMO (ed.), “WMO confirms 2025 was one of warmest years on record.” Press release. WMO, Geneva, January 2026.
  41. [41]WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2024, WMO-No. 1368. WMO, Geneva, 2025.
  42. [42]UNEP (ed.), Adaptation Gap Report 2024: Come Hell and High Water. UNEP, Nairobi, 2024.
  43. [43]World Bank Group (ed.), Poverty, Prosperity, and Planet Report 2024: Pathways Out of the Polycrisis. World Bank, Washington, DC, 2024.
  44. [44]International Labour Organization (ed.), World Social Protection Report 2024–26: Universal Social Protection for Climate Action and a Just Transition. ILO, Geneva, 2024.
  45. [45]S. Valadbaygi (ed.), Nexus Reports, The Foundational Edition, Volumes I and II. Nexus Reports series, Edition 2026–2030, V1.0. GCRI for the Nexus Consortium, Toronto, 2026.
  46. [46]S. Valadbaygi (ed.), Nexus Canada Systems Risk & Resilience Report 2026, Baseline Edition. GCRI for the Nexus Consortium, Toronto, 2026. NR-COUNTRY-CAN-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0.
  47. [47]J. Rockström, J. Gupta, D. Qin et al., “Safe and just Earth system boundaries,” Nature, vol. 619, pp. 102–111, 2023.
  48. [48]World Bank Group (ed.), Poverty, Prosperity, and Planet Report 2024: Pathways Out of the Polycrisis, extreme-poverty estimates. World Bank, Washington, DC, 2024.

Publication record

Who publishes it, on which terms.

Publication

Title
Nexus Strategic Systems Report 2026, Global Polycrisis and Cascading Systems Risk, Baseline Edition
Series
Nexus Reports · Strategic Systems Series SR-01
Edition
Baseline Edition 2026 · inaugural annual
Version
v1.0.0 · draft for stewardship review
Publication ID
NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Evidence close
30 September 2026
Publication date
October 2026
DOI
concept and version DOI at deposit

Publisher

Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), for the Nexus Consortium
Place
Toronto
Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor
Stewards
GCRI · technical truth · GRF · public meaning · GRA · capital meaning
Licence
text CC BY 4.0; data on the terms of each source
Copyright
© 2026 GCRI · Nexus Consortium
Language
English (en-GB) source edition
Correspondence
Nexus Registry correction pathway · editorial office

Colophon

Format
A4 portrait · __PAGES__ pages · screen, print and archival PDF
Typefaces
Space Grotesk (display) · Geist (text) · IBM Plex Sans Italic (standfirsts) · IBM Plex Mono (data)
Design standard
Nexus Reports Foundational Edition, Volume I, Part VII
Accessibility
tagged PDF and HTML targets; text alternatives for every figure
Production
Nexus Reports editorial team, GCRI

Release path for this version

Release path for this version

StepWhat happensWhen
Drafteditorial self-check complete at evidence closeOctober 2026
Steward reviewfive passes on the exact draft (keys T · M · F · N)Q4 2026
Approvalpublication authority approves the exact digestbefore release
Depositconcept and version DOI minted; registry pointer setat release
Successionthe 2027 polycrisis edition reports changes against this baseline2027
Current version
v1.0.0 draft, stewardship review
Previous edition
none, first edition of the series
Next edition
NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2027-v1.0.0
Latest version
resolve the concept DOI or the registry record
Correction route
Nexus Registry correction pathway
Notice types
erratum · addendum · supersession · withdrawal
Nexus ReportsNR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0Evidence close 30 September 2026GCRI for the Nexus Consortium, publisher of recordThe Global Centre for Risk and Innovation
Have questions?