Methodology

How the edition was made: methods, the model card, the evidence cut and its age, the acceptance record and the glossary.

9 min read0 figures12 tables6 notesNR-COUNTRY-USA-2026-BASELINE

Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. ·Executive summary
  3. 1America’s risk is coupled, not cumulative
  4. 2Key findings
  5. 3Systems and sectors at baseline
  6. 4Risks and capability
  7. 5Western heat, fire and grid summer
  8. 6Lenses and readings
  9. 7The 2027 agenda
  10. 8Systems in depth
  11. AMethodology
    1. A.1 Methods
    2. A.2 Model card, National Model v0
    3. A.3 The baseline evidence cut
    4. A.4 Evidence age and coverage
    5. A.5 Evidence cards, two anchor sources
    6. A.6 Publication acceptance record
    7. A.7 Status words
    8. A.8 How the edition is made, released and corrected
    9. A.9 Glossary and abbreviations
    10. A.10 Technical annex
  12. BData appendix
  13. CReferences and record
  14. ·Complete edition, for print

A.1Methods

The baseline uses published values and four simple derivations. Each is shown in full so that any reader can reproduce it.

Table A.1Methods
No.DerivationCalculationResult
(1)Insured share of North American losses, 202593 ÷ 133≈ 70%
(2)Uninsured North American losses, 2025133 − 93US$40 bn
(3)Share of withdrawals for power and irrigation41 + 37≈ 78%
(4)Insured share of the Los Angeles wildfires40 ÷ 53≈ 75%
Table A.2Coupling strength scale (matrix and model card)
StrengthDefinition
STRONGa disruption in the source system has historically changed the target system’s service or output within one season
MODERATEan effect is documented but buffered or slower
WEAKan effect is plausible but not documented at national scale
Table A.3Status grammar
LabelRule
Reportedvalue as issued by its source, with year
Inferredreasoned from cited evidence; never a measurement
EstimatedNexus analytical value with stated method
Scenarioconditional on stated assumptions
Expert inputstructured editorial judgement awaiting evidence

A.2Model card, National Model v0

Model ID
MDL-USA-NATIONAL · v0.1
Purpose
represent the United States as coupled water, energy, food, health and biodiversity systems with forcing and transmission layers
Family
graph-based system of systems
Inputs
the cited sources of this edition; no proprietary data
Method
expert-specified coupling strengths (STRONG · MODERATE · WEAK) from evidence and analogue events
Validation
none yet, first validation against Q1 2027 Foundry evidence
Uncertainty
qualitative; strengths are hypotheses, not measurements
Domain of validity
national scale; not for state or asset-level use
Reproducibility
strength table and sources published in this edition
20couplings

typed in v0

9strong

documented within one season

7moderate

documented, buffered

4weak

plausible, undocumented

A.3The baseline evidence cut

Every Nexus edition is published from a frozen evidence cut. The baseline cut is documentary: it pins the exact edition of every source cited. Model runs begin with the first Foundry cut in Q1 2027.

Cut ID
NQ-USA-2026-Q0-1
Type
baseline documentary cut
Resolution policy
pinned · as of 30 September 2026
Sources pinned
40 cited sources, each at the edition and retrieval date in the references
Model runs
none at baseline, analytical values are stated with their method
Digest
computed at freeze and recorded in the publication record
Supersedes
nothing, first cut of the series
Superseded by
NQ-USA-2027-Q1-1 at the Q1 2027 close

Lineage

  1. 01

    source edition

  2. 02

    pinned citation

  3. 03

    finding

  4. 04

    page

  5. 05

    publication record

Table A.4From the baseline cut to the first Foundry cut
ElementBaseline 2026Q1 2027
Sourcescited publications, pinned by editionqualified source bindings with versions
Analysisstated methods and editorial estimatestyped analysis specifications
ModelsNational Model v0 specificationmodel runs with receipts
Findingstwelve baseline findingsfindings re-bound to the cut
Reviewfive passes scheduledfive passes on the exact digest

A.4Evidence age and coverage

A 2026 edition rests on evidence observed in many different years. This page shows each time base, so that no single year label hides older evidence.

Table A.5Evidence age and coverage
IndicatorObservedReleasedCadenceNext release
Gross GHG emissions2022Apr 2024annualnext inventory
Disaster losses2025Jan 2026annualJan 2027
Billion-dollar disasters2024Jan 2025retired,
Population2024Dec 2024annualannual
Data-centre electricity share2023Dec 2024periodicnext report
Water withdrawals20152018five-yearlynext national estimate
Heat-related deaths2023Aug 2024periodicnew studies
Household food insecurity2023Dec 2024annualannual
Species at risk20232023periodicnext edition
Warming since 1970to 2023Nov 2023periodicnext assessment
Table A.6Coverage by system at baseline
SystemCoverageThinnest dimension
Climate forcingGOODstate-level downscaling
EnergyGOODreliability margins under new load
FinanceGOODinsurance availability by state
FoodGOODaquifer dependence
WaterPARTIALwater-use data last compiled for 2015
HealthPARTIALheat surge capacity
BiodiversityPARTIALecosystem condition
Digital and cyberTHINdependency mapping

A.5Evidence cards, two anchor sources

Issued by the Environmental Protection Agency under the UNFCCC. National coverage 1990–2022 with IPCC methods; each edition revises earlier years. Role: binds CLI-001.

EVD-USA-001

Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks1

Issued by the U.S. Geological Survey from state and federal data, compiled every five years. Role: binds WAT-007 and the withdrawal figure.

EVD-USA-002

Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 20157

Table A.7Quality dimensions at baseline
DimensionEVD-CAN-001EVD-CAN-002
Completenessall sectors and gasesall categories; some modelled
Timelinessabout 16 months after the yearabout three years after the year
Revisionannual back-revisionrevised between compilations
Method transparencypublished annexespublished methods
External validationUNFCCC expert reviewstate agency review

Evidence cards to follow in Q1 2027

  • Fifth National Climate Assessment3, warming and frequency findings
  • Heat-mortality study9, death-certificate method
  • Homeowners insurance analysis21, ZIP-level method
  • Data-centre report6, scenario method

A.6Publication acceptance record

Editorial self-check at evidence close. Every applicable item carries a disposition; the remaining items are review, approval and deposit.

Table A.8Publication acceptance record
GroupAreaItemsPassN/APending
D1Identity and scope8800
D2Source and data12912
D3Analysis and models12381
D4Findings and claims9801
D5Figures, tables, maps10622
D6Editorial and citations10802
D7Review and approval130013
D8Artefact and design12705
D9Registry and release9009

Publication gate

Conditions met
14 of 23 at evidence close
Blocking problems
none recorded
Open conditions
reviews, approval of the exact digest, deposit, registry pointer

Not applicable at baseline

Model runs
first runs in Q1 2027
Maps
plates in Q2 2027
Waivers
none

A.7Status words

Table A.9The status every value carries
StatusWhat it means
ObservedMeasured directly and published by the source.
ReportedPublished statistics of an official or institutional source.
DeclaredStated by the body concerned; not independently measured.
EstimatedA Nexus estimate from cited evidence, with its method in Annex A.
ModelledProduced by a stated model from cited inputs.
InferredReasoned from cited evidence; not measured.
ForecastA projection by the cited source.
SimulatedA simulation result under stated assumptions.
ScenarioA conditional statement under stated assumptions; never a prediction.
Expert inputExpert judgement, recorded with its basis.
CandidateProposed for a later edition; not yet evidence.
Evidence-quality levels (EQL 1 to 5) grade the source behind a value; they are not a score of the subject.

A.8How the edition is made, released and corrected

Every edition is built from a sealed evidence cut, reviewed under three keys, signed and deposited before any site shows it as published; corrections go to Nexus Standards as change proposals and feed the next cut.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Evidence arrives from the pillarsFoundry seals observations and indicator series, Universe hands over after-action and scenario findings, and contributions are screened at every gateway, including this site’s.
02 The cut is sealedOn the cut date the evidence is pinned under one identifier, so anyone can rebuild the edition from exactly what it was built on.
03 The edition is assembledThe edition is drafted from its template and content pack. Agents may draft; they never publish and never decide.
04 The keys turnAt the publisher of record the truth key comes first: every value is checked against its source or stated method before the meaning and capital keys turn. No edition moves on until every key has been turned by a named steward.
05 The gate opensA named approver releases one exact digest of the edition; any change after this point is a new version, never a silent edit.
06 Signed and depositedThe PDF, the web edition and the data bundle are signed together with a manifest and an RO-Crate description, and deposited on Zenodo with a concept and a version DOI.
07 Published on five sitesOnly then do the five Reports sites show the edition as published, each reading it through its own lens.
08 Corrections go to StandardsMethod and correction findings go to Nexus Standards as change proposals; citations, corrections and new contributions feed the next evidence cut.

A teaching model of the process, not a forecast and not a record of any run; dates and counts on this page come from the programme record. Sources: Reports governance at GCRI Canada (2026); Zenodo, repository of record for Reports deposits (2026).

Lifecycle, one state at a time: Draft, Computed, Evidence bound, Reviewed, Approved for release, Published, Corrected, Superseded. This edition is a draft.

A.9Glossary and abbreviations

Table A.10Series terms
TermMeaning
Baseline Editionthe inaugural annual edition that fixes the reference state for the series
WEFH+Bwater, energy, food, health and biodiversity, the national nexus core
Couplinga typed dependency through which one system transmits to another
Protection gapthe share of losses not covered by insurance
Capability ladderLISTED → EXISTS → ADEQUATE → TESTED → DEMONSTRATED
EQLevidence-quality level, 1–5
Evidence cuta frozen resolution of exact sources and versions
NNC · NLC · NWGNational Nexus Consortium · National Leadership Council · National Working Groups
Table A.11Abbreviations used in this edition
AbbreviationExpansion
BISBureau of Industry and Security
CISACybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
EIAEnergy Information Administration
EPAEnvironmental Protection Agency
ERSUSDA Economic Research Service
FEMAFederal Emergency Management Agency
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
FIOFederal Insurance Office
LBNLLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
NCA5Fifth National Climate Assessment
NERCNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation
NOAANational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NSM-22National Security Memorandum on Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience
USGSU.S. Geological Survey

A.10Technical annex

Table A.12Technical annex
ItemAnnexContentsStatus
A.1Indicator definitionsthe baseline indicator set, with units and sourcesIN THIS EDITION
A.2Coupling strengthsthe twenty-cell matrix and its rationaleIN THIS EDITION
A.3Scenario specificationSCN-USA-HFG-01 assumptions and signpostsIN THIS EDITION
A.4Capability placementsrung evidence for fifteen functionsIN THIS EDITION
A.5Model diagnosticsfirst runs and validationQ1 2027
A.6Sensitivity analysesinfluence of coupling strengthsQ2 2027
A.7State notesatlas cards for every state and territoryQ2 2027
A.8Review statementspass-by-pass review recordAT RELEASE

A.1 · indicator definition, gross greenhouse-gas emissions

Construct
annual anthropogenic greenhouse-gas emissions before land-sector removals
Unit
Mt CO₂e, 100-year global warming potentials
Scope
gross total; net total includes land use, land-use change and forestry
Source
EPA Inventory 1990–20221
Revision
back-revised each edition
Known limits
about 16 months’ lag at release

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (ed.), Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2022. EPA, Washington, DC, April 2024.back
  2. 7C. A. Dieter, M. A. Maupin, R. R. Caldwell et al., Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2015, Circular 1441. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 2018.back
  3. 3A. R. Crimmins, C. W. Avery, D. R. Easterling, K. E. Kunkel, B. C. Stewart and T. K. Maycock (eds.), Fifth National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, 2023.back
  4. 9J. T. Howard, N. Androne, K. C. Alcover and A. R. Santos-Lozada, “Trends of heat-related deaths in the US, 1999–2023,” JAMA, vol. 332, no. 14, pp. 1203–1204, 2024.back
  5. 21Federal Insurance Office (ed.), Analyses of U.S. Homeowners Insurance Markets, 2018–2022: Climate-Related Risks and Other Factors. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC, January 2025.back
  6. 6A. Shehabi, S. J. Smith, A. Hubbard et al., 2024 United States Data Center Energy Usage Report. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, December 2024.back

Cite this annex

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Annex A: Methodology. In United States Systems Risk and Resilience Report 2026: The State of the United States’ Interdependent Systems (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-COUNTRY-USA-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on United States.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRICountry Systems Risk and Resilience
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Support our work

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.