Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

  • Reports
  • Baseline Edition 2026
  • Complete edition

Exponential Technology Report 2026: Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering

Edition home

Choose A4 or Letter in the print dialog; running heads and page numbers are added in print. This is a review copy: the signed PDF with its DOI is issued at release.

ReportsXT-04

Exponential Technology

Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering 2026

Baseline Edition 2026NR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINEGCRI for the Nexus Consortium

Imprint

Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor, the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI)
Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) for the Nexus Consortium, Toronto
Report number
NR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE
Evidence close
30 September 2026, cut DC-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Status
Draft under stewardship review; not yet released
DOI and UNI
Issued at deposit
Licence
CC BY 4.0 for Nexus-authored text, tables and figures; third-party material keeps its own licence
Cite as
Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Exponential Technology Report 2026: Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI). https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/editions/xt-04/

Contents

  1. ·

    Executive summary

  2. 1

    Chapter 1. Synthetic biology is a build capability and a governance test

  3. 2

    Chapter 2. Key findings

  4. 3

    Chapter 3. Systems and sectors at baseline

  5. 4

    Chapter 4. Risks and capability

  6. 5

    Chapter 5. Design capability outpaces screening and oversight

  7. 6

    Chapter 6. Readings from the other desks

  8. 7

    Chapter 7. The 2027 agenda

  9. 8

    Chapter 8. Systems in depth

  10. A

    Annex A. Methodology

  11. B

    Annex B. Data appendix

  12. C

    Annex C. References and record

Executive summary

The edition on a few pages: the abstract, the key messages, the headline finding and what each steward reads in it.

7 min read1 figure0 tables15 notesNR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

S.1Abstract

Synthetic biology matters to the Nexus programme in three ways. It is a build capability: whole genomes are now designed and written, and in 2025 a bacterium was reported with a 57-codon genetic code, down from the standard 6412. It is a manufacturing base, built from DNA synthesis, biofoundries and fermentation capacity that few sources count. It is also a biosecurity question, because design tools and cheap DNA lower the barrier to harm as well as to benefit. The build evidence is strong at the scale of single organisms. A synthetic E. coli genome recoded 18,214 codons in 20193, and by 2023 six and a half synthetic yeast chromosomes had been combined in one strain4. Design tools have matured: a 2016 automation tool built 60 genetic circuits and 45 worked in every output state6. Therapies built with CRISPR reached patients, and 29 of 30 evaluable patients in one trial were free of severe crises for 12 months8. The risk evidence is newer. A 2025 study found that open machine-learning design software could produce protein variants that screening tools often missed, and it reported patches that improved detection13. Governance is moving but uneven. A US commission asked Congress in April 2025 for at least USD 15 billion over five years14, the EU proposed a Biotech Act on 16 December 202522, and the OECD found in May 2026 that implementation of anticipatory governance remains uneven18. Company revenue is a weak signal: Ginkgo Bioworks reported USD 170.2 million for 2025, down from USD 227.0 million17. The physical footprint of fermentation is the least measured part. This baseline sets out what the evidence supports and where it is thin. It forecasts no capability date and ranks no country or company.

S.2Key messages

Six readings that frame the synthetic biology baseline, and the eight questions this edition answers, each with its status and source.

  1. A bacterium with a 57-codon code and a yeast strain with six and a half synthetic chromosomes.24

    How far has genome writing come?Reported

  2. Yes at the scale of tens of circuits and designed binders, in peer-reviewed tests.67

    Can circuits and proteins be designed by software?Reported

  3. A CRISPR therapy was authorised in the US in December 2023.89

    Do engineered therapies reach patients?Reported

  4. A 2025 study found tools often missed redesigned sequences; patches helped.13

    Is DNA screening keeping up with design tools?Reported

  5. A US commission report, an EU proposal, OECD and CBD work; uneven implementation.141822

    What does governance look like?Reported

  6. Company results are mixed: Ginkgo revenue fell in 2025, Twist raised its 2026 guidance.1617

    What does the money look like?Reported

  7. Not published on a common basis; no figure bound.24

    What is the physical footprint?Expert input

  8. Whether screening and governance keep pace with design and cheap DNA. SCN-XT04-DSG-01

    What will 2027 test first?Expert input

S.3Headline finding

ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-BLD-001

A bacterium with a 57-codon genetic code was reported in Science in 2025, seven codons fewer than the standard 64, with over 101,000 codon changes in a synthetic genome of about 4 million base pairs.

Figure S.1Codons in the genetic code
ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
Standard genetic code64
Syn61 strain (2019)61
Syn57 strain (2025)57

Sources: MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology2; Nature 569 (2019)3. Each bar counts codons in the code of that organism.

Whole-genome design and writing now works at the scale of a bacterial genome. The authors state aims such as further compression and tests of viral resistance; those are plans, not results12. The result shows capability on one organism and says nothing about industrial use, cost or safety in the field.

S.4At a glance

57codons

Syn57 genetic code2

6.5chromosomes

synthetic yeast in one strain4

97%

exa-cel trial, 29 of 308

49recommendations

US commission, 202514

170.2USD million

Ginkgo revenue, 202517

25awards

US bioindustrial planning awards, 202424

S.5What each steward reads in it

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports reading synthetic biology as a build capability, a manufacturing base and a governance test.

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people synthetic biology arrives as a medicine, a food label or a warning about misuse.

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. Company results are mixed and public programmes are at the planning stage.

NEXUS

Synthesis

Synthetic biology is well described by single results and thinly measured as a system.

S.6What this edition is, and is not

What this edition is

A baseline: the 2026 state of synthetic biology and bioengineering as infrastructure and the couplings through which it carries risk into other systems. It synthesises published evidence and ranks no country, company or asset.

What it is not

Not a forecast of any capability date, a technology ranking, an endorsement of any company or an assessment of any laboratory or programme. Biosafety, biosecurity, export-control and funding rules are decisions of competent authorities.

What comes next

National, regional and sector evidence feeds the 2027 synthetic biology edition through the federation. Each edition reports what changed against this baseline: observations, source revisions, method changes, scenario updates and corrections.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1Robertson, W.E. et al., Escherichia coli with a 57-codon genetic code, Science 390 (6771), eady4368, published 23 October 2025 (record read via PubMed, PMID 40743368; the record gives a 4 megabase synthetic genome and six replaced sense codons). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 2MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (ed.), Syn57 represents a new chapter in the genetic code of life (news page, 1 August 2025; over 101,000 codons recoded; 64 to 57 codons; genome of about 4 megabases built from 38 fragments of about 100 kilobases). MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 3Fredens, J. et al., Total synthesis of Escherichia coli with a recoded genome, Nature 569 (7757), 514 to 518, 2019 (record read via Europe PMC: 18,214 codons recoded; 61-codon genome). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 4Debugging and consolidating multiple synthetic chromosomes reveals combinatorial genetic interactions, Cell 186 (24), 5220 to 5236, 2023 (record read via Europe PMC: 6.5 synthetic chromosomes in one strain; over half of the Sc2.0 genome). Cell Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 6Nielsen, A.A.K. et al., Genetic circuit design automation, Science 352 (6281), 2016 (record read via Europe PMC: 60 circuits; 45 correct in all output states; 92% of output states as predicted). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2016. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 8Frangoul, H. et al., Exagamglogene autotemcel for severe sickle cell disease, New England Journal of Medicine 390 (18), 1649 to 1662, 2024 (record read via Europe PMC: 44 treated; 29 of 30 evaluable free of severe crises for 12 months; median follow-up 19.3 months). Massachusetts Medical Society, Waltham. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 13Strengthening nucleic acid biosecurity screening against generative protein design tools, Science 390 (6768), 82 to 87, 2025 (record read via Europe PMC; abstract only; no method detail used). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 14Congressional Research Service (ed.), National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology: Final Report and Options for Congress, CRS Insight IN12546, 17 April 2025 (report of 8 April 2025; 49 recommendations; at least USD 15 billion over five years; National Biotechnology Coordination Office). Library of Congress, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 22Baker McKenzie (ed.), EU Biotech Act unveiled: Commission proposal to turn Europe into a biotech powerhouse (law firm summary, 19 December 2025; proposal of 16 December 2025; health focus; investment pilot with the European Investment Bank Group; 12-month certificate extension; biodefence measures; second act expected in Q3 2026). Secondary source, not the Commission text. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 18OECD (ed.), Anticipatory governance for responsible innovation in synthetic biology, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 193, 21 May 2026 (record read via a bibliographic database; abstract only). OECD Publishing, Paris. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 17Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, fourth quarter and full year 2025 results (company filing of 26 February 2026; revenue USD 170.155 million against USD 227.043 million; net loss USD 312.763 million; company statements are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 7Watson, J.L. et al., De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion, Nature 620, 1089 to 1100, 2023 (record read via Europe PMC). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 9US Food and Drug Administration (ed.), FDA approves first gene therapies to treat patients with sickle cell disease (press announcement, 8 December 2023; Casgevy and Lyfgenia; ages 12 and over; 29 of 31 evaluable Casgevy patients free of severe crises for at least 12 months). FDA, Silver Spring. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 16Twist Bioscience Corporation (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, results for the fiscal third quarter ended 30 June 2026 (company filing; revenue USD 118.4 million; nine months USD 332.8 million; fiscal 2026 guidance USD 456 to 457 million; company statements and guidance are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 24US Manufacturing Program (ed.), Bioindustrial (programme topic page; Distributed Bioindustrial Manufacturing Program awards announced 10 July to 13 September 2024; 25 awards; USD 42 million cumulative). Manufacturing USA, Gaithersburg. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Synthetic biology is a build capability and a governance test

Part I describes systems and their couplings. It ranks no country or operator and assesses no authority.

7 min read2 figures1 table17 notesNR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

1.1The questions this part answers

Key questions

  • Where is synthetic biology risk concentrated?
  • Which couplings carry synthetic biology shocks into other systems?
  • Which synthetic biology capabilities hold under compound stress?
  • What must 2027 evidence measure first?

In this part

  • Narrative
  • Headline finding
  • Lead figure
  • Five footprint and governance chapters
  • Twelve-domain reading
  • Sector screens
  • Dependency matrix
  • Risk objects
  • Capability ladder
  • Scenario
  • Three lenses
  • Portfolio

1.2The argument

Synthetic biology is usually told as a story of products. The 2026 evidence reads it as three things at once: a capability to design and write living systems, a manufacturing base that needs DNA, instruments, feedstock and people, and a governance test for oversight that was written for slower tools11318.

The build evidence is strong at small scale. A bacterium now runs on a 57-codon genetic code, and a yeast strain carries six and a half synthetic chromosomes24. Software built 60 genetic circuits and 45 worked in every output state6. These are results on single organisms, not industrial platforms.

The risk evidence is newer and sharper. A 2025 study found that screening tools often missed protein variants redesigned with open software, and patches improved detection13. A 2024 policy forum asked for broad discussion of mirror life12. Governance is moving: a US commission report, an EU proposal and OECD and CBD work all appeared between 2022 and 2026, but implementation is uneven14182022.

The physical base is the least measured part. Company revenue is mixed, with Ginkgo Bioworks down and Twist Bioscience guiding up1617. Energy, water, feedstock, capacity and workforce figures are not published on a common basis.

Figure 1.1How much recoding has been built? Codons changed in a synthetic genome, thousands

The number of recoded codons rose about fivefold between two strains from the same research line. The Syn57 figure is stated as over 101,000, so the ratio is a lower bound23.

ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
Syn61 strain, 2019: 18,214 codons18.2
Syn57 strain, 2025: over 101,000 codons101

Source: as cited in the note to this figure. Year 2025.

Figure ID FIG-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-01-003

101thousand codons

recoded in Syn57, lower bound2

18.2thousand codons

recoded in Syn613

38fragments

of about 100,000 base pairs each2

4million base pairs

approximate genome size1

1.3Twenty couplings between five systems

The synthetic biology-centred matrix types the twenty couplings between the five core systems, read for their synthetic biology content. Strengths are Nexus estimates (ESTIMATED) from the cited evidence and analogue events; they set the graph that 2027 evidence will test.

Figure 1.2Couplings between the five systems

Each line is one coupling from one system to another, drawn by the strength the edition assigns. Strengths are Nexus estimates from the cited evidence and analogue events.

  • Strong
  • Moderate
  • Weak

Source: this edition’s coupling matrix (Table 1.1); status Estimated.

Table 1.1Coupling matrix: from the row system to the column system
From, toWATENEFOOHLTBIO
WAT Water·WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
process water, undocumented
WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
process water, undocumented
ENE EnergyWEAK
no documented link
·WEAK
feedstock energy, undocumented
WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
process energy, undocumented
FOO FoodWEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
·WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
feedstock supply, undocumented
HLT HealthWEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
·WEAK
clinical demand, undocumented
BIO BiodiversityWEAK
no documented link
WEAK
bio-based fuels, undocumented
WEAK
no documented link
MODERATE
engineered cell therapies reach patients
·
Strength: strong, moderate or weak; a Nexus estimate (status Estimated) from cited evidence and analogue events. The scale is defined in Annex A.

Transmission paths

  1. 01

    DAT → BIO → SEC

    Design tools and sequence data lower the barrier to misuse faster than screening adapts.

    Reported 2025 screening study13

  2. 02

    BIO → HLT

    Engineered cell therapies move from research to patients.

    Reported exa-cel trial and regulator announcement89

  3. 03

    FIN → INF

    Public programmes fund manufacturing planning.

    Reported US programme awards2324

  4. 04

    ENE → BIO

    Process energy and feedstock constrain manufacturing at scale.

    Inferred no figure bound

  5. 05

    GOV → BIO

    Frameworks and proposals set oversight and incentives.

    Reported US, EU and OECD documents141822

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1Robertson, W.E. et al., Escherichia coli with a 57-codon genetic code, Science 390 (6771), eady4368, published 23 October 2025 (record read via PubMed, PMID 40743368; the record gives a 4 megabase synthetic genome and six replaced sense codons). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 13Strengthening nucleic acid biosecurity screening against generative protein design tools, Science 390 (6768), 82 to 87, 2025 (record read via Europe PMC; abstract only; no method detail used). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 18OECD (ed.), Anticipatory governance for responsible innovation in synthetic biology, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 193, 21 May 2026 (record read via a bibliographic database; abstract only). OECD Publishing, Paris. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 2MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (ed.), Syn57 represents a new chapter in the genetic code of life (news page, 1 August 2025; over 101,000 codons recoded; 64 to 57 codons; genome of about 4 megabases built from 38 fragments of about 100 kilobases). MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 4Debugging and consolidating multiple synthetic chromosomes reveals combinatorial genetic interactions, Cell 186 (24), 5220 to 5236, 2023 (record read via Europe PMC: 6.5 synthetic chromosomes in one strain; over half of the Sc2.0 genome). Cell Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 6Nielsen, A.A.K. et al., Genetic circuit design automation, Science 352 (6281), 2016 (record read via Europe PMC: 60 circuits; 45 correct in all output states; 92% of output states as predicted). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2016. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 12Confronting risks of mirror life, Science 386, 1351 to 1353, 2024 (record read via Europe PMC; the record gives only a one-line abstract calling for broad discussion). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 14Congressional Research Service (ed.), National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology: Final Report and Options for Congress, CRS Insight IN12546, 17 April 2025 (report of 8 April 2025; 49 recommendations; at least USD 15 billion over five years; National Biotechnology Coordination Office). Library of Congress, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 20Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (ed.), Synthetic biology (programme page; decisions X/13 to 16/21; AHTEG; horizon scanning; thematic action plan). CBD Secretariat, Montreal. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 22Baker McKenzie (ed.), EU Biotech Act unveiled: Commission proposal to turn Europe into a biotech powerhouse (law firm summary, 19 December 2025; proposal of 16 December 2025; health focus; investment pilot with the European Investment Bank Group; 12-month certificate extension; biodefence measures; second act expected in Q3 2026). Secondary source, not the Commission text. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 16Twist Bioscience Corporation (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, results for the fiscal third quarter ended 30 June 2026 (company filing; revenue USD 118.4 million; nine months USD 332.8 million; fiscal 2026 guidance USD 456 to 457 million; company statements and guidance are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 17Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, fourth quarter and full year 2025 results (company filing of 26 February 2026; revenue USD 170.155 million against USD 227.043 million; net loss USD 312.763 million; company statements are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 3Fredens, J. et al., Total synthesis of Escherichia coli with a recoded genome, Nature 569 (7757), 514 to 518, 2019 (record read via Europe PMC: 18,214 codons recoded; 61-codon genome). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 8Frangoul, H. et al., Exagamglogene autotemcel for severe sickle cell disease, New England Journal of Medicine 390 (18), 1649 to 1662, 2024 (record read via Europe PMC: 44 treated; 29 of 30 evaluable free of severe crises for 12 months; median follow-up 19.3 months). Massachusetts Medical Society, Waltham. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 9US Food and Drug Administration (ed.), FDA approves first gene therapies to treat patients with sickle cell disease (press announcement, 8 December 2023; Casgevy and Lyfgenia; ages 12 and over; 29 of 31 evaluable Casgevy patients free of severe crises for at least 12 months). FDA, Silver Spring. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 23BioMADE (ed.), DoD approves USD 87 million for newest bioindustrial manufacturing innovation institute (news page; seven years; the page shows Oct 20 and a 2023 footer, the press release is dated 2020 in search listings). BioMADE, Saint Paul. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 24US Manufacturing Program (ed.), Bioindustrial (programme topic page; Distributed Bioindustrial Manufacturing Program awards announced 10 July to 13 September 2024; 25 awards; USD 42 million cumulative). Manufacturing USA, Gaithersburg. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Key findings

Twelve findings carry the synthetic biology baseline. They are grouped by coupling and never ranked. Each resolves to its source or, where Nexus analysis is involved, to its stated method.

9 min read1 figure0 tables28 notesNR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

2.1Headline finding

ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-BLD-001

A bacterium with a 57-codon genetic code was reported in Science in 2025, seven codons fewer than the standard 64, with over 101,000 codon changes in a synthetic genome of about 4 million base pairs.

Figure 2.1Codons in the genetic code
ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
Standard genetic code64
Syn61 strain (2019)61
Syn57 strain (2025)57

Sources: MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology2; Nature 569 (2019)3. Each bar counts codons in the code of that organism.

Implication

Whole-genome design and writing now works at the scale of a bacterial genome. The authors state aims such as further compression and tests of viral resistance; those are plans, not results12. The result shows capability on one organism and says nothing about industrial use, cost or safety in the field.

What would move it

Peer-reviewed tests of viral resistance, independent replication and any published cost of whole-genome synthesis would each move this finding.

2.2BLD

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-BLD-001

    A bacterium with a 57-codon genetic code was reported in 2025. Its synthetic genome of about 4 million base pairs carries over 101,000 codon changes and was built from 38 fragments of about 100,000 base pairs; an earlier strain recoded 18,214 codons and uses 61 codons.12344

  2. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-BLD-002

    By 2023 a single yeast strain carried six and a half synthetic chromosomes, over half of the synthetic yeast genome design; in 2010 the first cell run by a chemically synthesised genome had a 1.08 million base pair genome.4543

  3. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-BLD-003

    A 2016 design automation tool built 60 genetic circuits in E. coli, 45 worked in every output state and 92% of output states matched predictions; a 2023 generative method designed protein binders, and one binder to influenza hemagglutinin matched its design model in a cryo-EM structure.67

2.3CLN

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-CLN-004

    A CRISPR-edited cell therapy was authorised by the US regulator on 8 December 2023; in a phase 3 study 29 of 30 evaluable patients (97%) were free of severe crises for 12 months, and in 2025 a patient-specific base-editing therapy was given to one infant.8910

2.4Security

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-SEC-005

    A 2025 Science study found that current screening tools often failed to detect sequences redesigned with open machine-learning protein design software, and reported patches that substantially improved detection.13

  2. ReportedEQL 3NRF-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-SEC-006

    A 2024 Science policy forum on mirror life called for broad discussion on a path forward.12

2.5Governance

  1. ReportedEQL 2NRF-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-GOV-007

    Executive Order 14292 of May 2025 gave OSTP 90 days to revise or replace the 2024 US framework for nucleic acid synthesis screening; a Congressional Research Service note found in July 2026 that it could not determine whether either had been revised, and sources differ on whether the framework is in force.25262730

  2. ReportedEQL 3NRF-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-GOV-008

    The US National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology delivered its final report on 8 April 2025 with 49 recommendations and a call for at least USD 15 billion over five years.1415

  3. ReportedEQL 2NRF-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-GOV-009

    The European Commission proposed a Biotech Act on 16 December 2025, centred on health biotechnology, with an investment pilot with the European Investment Bank Group, a 12-month certificate extension and biodefence measures; a second act on the wider ecosystem was expected in the third quarter of 2026.222829

  4. ReportedEQL 3NRF-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-GOV-010

    The OECD found in May 2026 that governments are moving toward adaptive synthetic biology governance but that implementation remains uneven; the CBD asked in decision 16/21 for a thematic action plan on capacity building and technology transfer.181920

2.6Finance

  1. ReportedEQL 2NRF-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-FIN-011

    Ginkgo Bioworks reported revenue of USD 170.2 million for 2025 against USD 227.0 million for 2024, and Twist Bioscience reported USD 332.8 million for the nine months to 30 June 2026 with full-year guidance of USD 456 to 457 million. These are company statements.1617

2.7Systemic

  1. Expert inputEQL 2NRF-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-SYS-012

    The leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is design capability and cheap DNA moving faster than screening practice and governance, while the footprint of the manufacturing base stays unmeasured. § scenario

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 2MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (ed.), Syn57 represents a new chapter in the genetic code of life (news page, 1 August 2025; over 101,000 codons recoded; 64 to 57 codons; genome of about 4 megabases built from 38 fragments of about 100 kilobases). MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 3Fredens, J. et al., Total synthesis of Escherichia coli with a recoded genome, Nature 569 (7757), 514 to 518, 2019 (record read via Europe PMC: 18,214 codons recoded; 61-codon genome). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 1Robertson, W.E. et al., Escherichia coli with a 57-codon genetic code, Science 390 (6771), eady4368, published 23 October 2025 (record read via PubMed, PMID 40743368; the record gives a 4 megabase synthetic genome and six replaced sense codons). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 44UNVERIFIED, not opened: bioRxiv preprint of the Syn57 study, Escherichia coli with a 57-codon genetic code, 2025, identified from a search result; the page returned HTTP 429. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 4Debugging and consolidating multiple synthetic chromosomes reveals combinatorial genetic interactions, Cell 186 (24), 5220 to 5236, 2023 (record read via Europe PMC: 6.5 synthetic chromosomes in one strain; over half of the Sc2.0 genome). Cell Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 5Gibson, D.G. et al., Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesised genome, Science 329 (5987), 52 to 56, 2010 (record read via Europe PMC: 1.08 million base pair genome). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2010. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 43UNVERIFIED, not opened: Richardson, S.M. et al., Design of a synthetic yeast genome, Science 355, 1040 to 1044, 2017, cited from memory. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 6Nielsen, A.A.K. et al., Genetic circuit design automation, Science 352 (6281), 2016 (record read via Europe PMC: 60 circuits; 45 correct in all output states; 92% of output states as predicted). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2016. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 7Watson, J.L. et al., De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion, Nature 620, 1089 to 1100, 2023 (record read via Europe PMC). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 8Frangoul, H. et al., Exagamglogene autotemcel for severe sickle cell disease, New England Journal of Medicine 390 (18), 1649 to 1662, 2024 (record read via Europe PMC: 44 treated; 29 of 30 evaluable free of severe crises for 12 months; median follow-up 19.3 months). Massachusetts Medical Society, Waltham. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 9US Food and Drug Administration (ed.), FDA approves first gene therapies to treat patients with sickle cell disease (press announcement, 8 December 2023; Casgevy and Lyfgenia; ages 12 and over; 29 of 31 evaluable Casgevy patients free of severe crises for at least 12 months). FDA, Silver Spring. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 10Musunuru, K. et al., Patient-specific in vivo gene editing to treat a rare genetic disease, New England Journal of Medicine 392 (22), 2235 to 2243, 2025 (record read via Europe PMC: one infant; two infusions at about 7 and 8 months). Massachusetts Medical Society, Waltham. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 13Strengthening nucleic acid biosecurity screening against generative protein design tools, Science 390 (6768), 82 to 87, 2025 (record read via Europe PMC; abstract only; no method detail used). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 12Confronting risks of mirror life, Science 386, 1351 to 1353, 2024 (record read via Europe PMC; the record gives only a one-line abstract calling for broad discussion). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 25UNVERIFIED, not opened: Office of Science and Technology Policy (ed.), Framework for Nucleic Acid Synthesis Screening, April 2024, taken from search-result summaries; a fetch of the page was refused by the fetch tool. OSTP, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: Executive Order 14292, Improving the Safety and Security of Biological Research, 5 May 2025 (90 days to revise or replace the framework), taken from search-result summaries; a fetch of an explainer page was refused by the fetch tool. The White House, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: Congressional Research Service (ed.), report on artificial intelligence and biosecurity risks (reported in July 2026 as unable to determine whether the 2024 framework or the 2025 policy had been revised), taken from a trade news summary. Library of Congress, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: Engineering Biology Research Consortium (ed.), response on nucleic acid synthesis screening under Executive Order 14292, November 2025, listed in search results only. EBRC, Emeryville. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 14Congressional Research Service (ed.), National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology: Final Report and Options for Congress, CRS Insight IN12546, 17 April 2025 (report of 8 April 2025; 49 recommendations; at least USD 15 billion over five years; National Biotechnology Coordination Office). Library of Congress, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 15Federation of American Scientists (ed.), Translating Vision into Action: FAS commentary on the NSCEB final report (commentary page; six pillars; cites over USD 210 billion of US GDP and over 640,000 jobs for the bioeconomy; secondary and advocacy-leaning source). Federation of American Scientists, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 22Baker McKenzie (ed.), EU Biotech Act unveiled: Commission proposal to turn Europe into a biotech powerhouse (law firm summary, 19 December 2025; proposal of 16 December 2025; health focus; investment pilot with the European Investment Bank Group; 12-month certificate extension; biodefence measures; second act expected in Q3 2026). Secondary source, not the Commission text. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Commission (ed.), Proposal for a Biotech Act, COM(2025) 1022, 16 December 2025, taken from law firm and regulator summaries; the Commission page was not retrieved. European Commission, Brussels. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 29UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Parliament (ed.), Legislative train entry for the European Biotech Act II (second act expected in the third quarter of 2026), taken from a search-result summary; the page returned no content. European Parliament, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  24. 18OECD (ed.), Anticipatory governance for responsible innovation in synthetic biology, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 193, 21 May 2026 (record read via a bibliographic database; abstract only). OECD Publishing, Paris. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  25. 19OECD (ed.), Synthetic biology, AI and automation: a forward-looking technology assessment, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 187, 4 December 2025 (record read via a bibliographic database; abstract only). OECD Publishing, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  26. 20Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (ed.), Synthetic biology (programme page; decisions X/13 to 16/21; AHTEG; horizon scanning; thematic action plan). CBD Secretariat, Montreal. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  27. 16Twist Bioscience Corporation (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, results for the fiscal third quarter ended 30 June 2026 (company filing; revenue USD 118.4 million; nine months USD 332.8 million; fiscal 2026 guidance USD 456 to 457 million; company statements and guidance are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  28. 17Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, fourth quarter and full year 2025 results (company filing of 26 February 2026; revenue USD 170.155 million against USD 227.043 million; net loss USD 312.763 million; company statements are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Systems and sectors at baseline

7 min read0 figures2 tables18 notesNR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

3.1Where each system stood at evidence close

BLD · Genomes

Codons in the genetic code of the Syn57 strain

57codons

down from 64; over 101,000 codon changes.

Reported2025Science12

BLD · Yeast

Synthetic yeast chromosomes combined in one strain

6.5chromosomes

over half of the synthetic genome in one strain.

Reported2023Cell4

CLN · Therapy

Patients free of severe crises for 12 months, exa-cel trial

97%

29 of 30 evaluable patients.

Reported2024NEJM8

GOV · Governance

Minimum federal funding recommended by a US commission

15USD billion

over five years; a recommendation, not spending.

Reported2025CRS14

FIN · Finance

Ginkgo Bioworks revenue

170.2USD million

down from USD 227.0 million in 2024; company filing.

Reported2025company filing17

SYS · Cross-system

Awards in the US distributed bioindustrial manufacturing programme

25awards

USD 42 million in total by September 2024.

Reported2024programme page24

3.2Domain posture

Each of the twelve coupled domains is read through synthetic biology, in words, not scored. The coupling column names the dependency that carries synthetic biology risk into each domain.

Table 3.1Each domain read in words, not scored
DomainPosture at baselineCouplingStatus
WATProcess water use of fermentation and facilities is not published on a common basis.WAT → BIOExpert input EQL 1
ENEEnergy use of biomanufacturing at scale is not bound; no figure used.ENE ↔ BIOExpert input EQL 1
FOONo coupling documented at baseline in the sources read; precision fermentation and crop work are not evidenced here.none documentedExpert input EQL 1
HLTA CRISPR therapy was authorised in 2023 and 29 of 30 evaluable trial patients had no severe crises for 12 months.BIO → HLTReported EQL 4
BIOThe core system: recoded genomes, synthetic yeast chromosomes, designed circuits and proteins.the core systemReported EQL 4
CLIBio-based production could change emissions; no figure bound here.none documentedExpert input EQL 1
INFUS planning awards and an institute for bioindustrial manufacturing; capacity itself is not counted.FIN → INFReported EQL 3
FINCompany revenue is mixed: Ginkgo fell to USD 170.2 million, Twist guided to USD 456 to 457 million.FIN → BIOReported EQL 2
DATDesign tools and sequence data couple to screening; the 2025 study tested that link.DAT → BIOReported EQL 4
AICMachine-learning design tools are part of the build capability and of the screening problem.AIC → BIOReported EQL 4
MINReagent, instrument and feedstock dependence is not documented in the sources read.none documentedExpert input EQL 1
TRDExport controls and biosecurity rules shape access to tools and materials; text not bound.BIO ↔ TRDInferred EQL 2

3.3Sector screens

All sixteen sectors are screened for their dependence on synthetic biology, on the same grammar as every national edition. The evidence column describes coverage of the baseline evidence, not the performance of the sector.

Table 3.2Sectors: baseline evidence and the exposure to watch
CodeSectorBaseline evidenceExposure to watchEvidence coverage
GS-00Cross-systemsynthetic biology couples to health, food, finance and biosecuritydesign and screening gapTHIN
GS-01Waterprocess water use not publishedfacility sitingTHIN
GS-02Energyenergy footprint of manufacturing not boundload from large facilitiesTHIN
GS-03Foodno documented coupling in the sources readnone documentedTHIN
GS-04Healthauthorised CRISPR therapy and trial results89access and costPARTIAL
GS-05Financecompany filings give a weak signal1617funding gapsPARTIAL
GS-06Developmentaccess to tools and skillswidening gapsTHIN
GS-07Climatefootprint at scale not boundenergy and feedstock demandTHIN
GS-08Disasterno documented couplingnone documentedTHIN
GS-09Infrastructuremanufacturing planning awards2324capacity not countedTHIN
GS-10Citiesno documented couplingnone documentedTHIN
GS-11Biodiversitygene drive and release questions1120release and oversightPARTIAL
GS-12Earth observationno documented couplingnone documentedTHIN
GS-13Cyber and digitalscreening of machine-designed sequences13sequence data handlingPARTIAL
GS-14PolicyUS, EU, OECD and CBD instruments14182022uneven implementationPARTIAL
GS-15Sciencestrong peer-reviewed base13467common benchmarksGOOD

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1Robertson, W.E. et al., Escherichia coli with a 57-codon genetic code, Science 390 (6771), eady4368, published 23 October 2025 (record read via PubMed, PMID 40743368; the record gives a 4 megabase synthetic genome and six replaced sense codons). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 2MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (ed.), Syn57 represents a new chapter in the genetic code of life (news page, 1 August 2025; over 101,000 codons recoded; 64 to 57 codons; genome of about 4 megabases built from 38 fragments of about 100 kilobases). MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 4Debugging and consolidating multiple synthetic chromosomes reveals combinatorial genetic interactions, Cell 186 (24), 5220 to 5236, 2023 (record read via Europe PMC: 6.5 synthetic chromosomes in one strain; over half of the Sc2.0 genome). Cell Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 8Frangoul, H. et al., Exagamglogene autotemcel for severe sickle cell disease, New England Journal of Medicine 390 (18), 1649 to 1662, 2024 (record read via Europe PMC: 44 treated; 29 of 30 evaluable free of severe crises for 12 months; median follow-up 19.3 months). Massachusetts Medical Society, Waltham. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 14Congressional Research Service (ed.), National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology: Final Report and Options for Congress, CRS Insight IN12546, 17 April 2025 (report of 8 April 2025; 49 recommendations; at least USD 15 billion over five years; National Biotechnology Coordination Office). Library of Congress, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 17Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, fourth quarter and full year 2025 results (company filing of 26 February 2026; revenue USD 170.155 million against USD 227.043 million; net loss USD 312.763 million; company statements are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 24US Manufacturing Program (ed.), Bioindustrial (programme topic page; Distributed Bioindustrial Manufacturing Program awards announced 10 July to 13 September 2024; 25 awards; USD 42 million cumulative). Manufacturing USA, Gaithersburg. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 9US Food and Drug Administration (ed.), FDA approves first gene therapies to treat patients with sickle cell disease (press announcement, 8 December 2023; Casgevy and Lyfgenia; ages 12 and over; 29 of 31 evaluable Casgevy patients free of severe crises for at least 12 months). FDA, Silver Spring. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 16Twist Bioscience Corporation (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, results for the fiscal third quarter ended 30 June 2026 (company filing; revenue USD 118.4 million; nine months USD 332.8 million; fiscal 2026 guidance USD 456 to 457 million; company statements and guidance are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 23BioMADE (ed.), DoD approves USD 87 million for newest bioindustrial manufacturing innovation institute (news page; seven years; the page shows Oct 20 and a 2023 footer, the press release is dated 2020 in search listings). BioMADE, Saint Paul. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 11Kyrou, K. et al., A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes, Nature Biotechnology 36, 1062 to 1066, 2018 (record read via Europe PMC; laboratory cages only). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 20Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (ed.), Synthetic biology (programme page; decisions X/13 to 16/21; AHTEG; horizon scanning; thematic action plan). CBD Secretariat, Montreal. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 13Strengthening nucleic acid biosecurity screening against generative protein design tools, Science 390 (6768), 82 to 87, 2025 (record read via Europe PMC; abstract only; no method detail used). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 18OECD (ed.), Anticipatory governance for responsible innovation in synthetic biology, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 193, 21 May 2026 (record read via a bibliographic database; abstract only). OECD Publishing, Paris. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 22Baker McKenzie (ed.), EU Biotech Act unveiled: Commission proposal to turn Europe into a biotech powerhouse (law firm summary, 19 December 2025; proposal of 16 December 2025; health focus; investment pilot with the European Investment Bank Group; 12-month certificate extension; biodefence measures; second act expected in Q3 2026). Secondary source, not the Commission text. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 3Fredens, J. et al., Total synthesis of Escherichia coli with a recoded genome, Nature 569 (7757), 514 to 518, 2019 (record read via Europe PMC: 18,214 codons recoded; 61-codon genome). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 6Nielsen, A.A.K. et al., Genetic circuit design automation, Science 352 (6281), 2016 (record read via Europe PMC: 60 circuits; 45 correct in all output states; 92% of output states as predicted). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2016. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 7Watson, J.L. et al., De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion, Nature 620, 1089 to 1100, 2023 (record read via Europe PMC). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Risks and capability

Four synthetic biology risk objects open the portfolio. Order carries no rank. Each is read across driver, exposure, vulnerability, capacity, cascade and consequence.

6 min read0 figures1 table23 notesNR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

4.1Risk objects

Each risk is read across the chain from hazard to consequence, with its status and evidence-quality level.

  1. InferredEQL 3RSK-XT04-SEC-001

    Design capability outpaces screening

    Driver
    open machine-learning design tools and low-cost DNA713
    Exposure
    sequence-handling and synthesis providers
    Vulnerability
    uneven screening practice; benchtop and small providers
    Capacity
    screening guidance, patches and oversight frameworks13253132
    Cascade
    DAT → BIO → HLT
    Horizon
    1 to 5 years
  2. InferredEQL 3RSK-XT04-GOV-002

    Fragmented and shifting oversight

    Driver
    unclear status of the US framework; separate EU and CBD tracks20222627
    Exposure
    research collaboration; cross-border orders
    Vulnerability
    uneven implementation across jurisdictions18
    Capacity
    OECD and WHO guidance; national strategies1821
    Cascade
    GOV → BIO, FIN
    Horizon
    1 to 5 years
  3. Expert inputEQL 2RSK-XT04-SUP-003

    Manufacturing base thinner than headlines

    Driver
    mixed company results and planning-stage public awards161724
    Exposure
    products that depend on scale-up
    Vulnerability
    few counted facilities; unmeasured feedstock needs
    Capacity
    institute and awards programme2324
    Cascade
    FIN → INF → BIO
    Horizon
    1 to 10 years
  4. InferredEQL 2RSK-XT04-ENV-004

    Release and novel-organism questions

    Driver
    gene drives and organisms with altered codes or chirality11112
    Exposure
    ecosystems; public trust
    Vulnerability
    limited field evidence; international rules still forming
    Capacity
    CBD process and protocol2035
    Cascade
    BIO → BIO biodiversity systems
    Horizon
    5 to 10 years

4.2Capability ladder

Existence is not readiness. Each of the fifteen capability functions is placed on the ladder by the strongest public evidence for synthetic biology at the global level.

Table 4.1Capabilities on the ladder of evidence: listed, exists, demonstrated, tested
FunctionRungLevelStrongest public evidence at baseline
Prevention and mitigationEXISTSscreening guidance and dual-use frameworks published212531
Monitoring and observationLISTEDno common tracker of synthesis orders or screening coverage
Early warningLISTEDhorizon scanning exists under the CBD but is scaled back20
Preparedness and planningEXISTSUS commission report, EU proposal and OECD papers141822
Redundancy and reservesLISTEDmanufacturing capacity and reserves not counted
ResponseLISTEDno tested response to a misuse event described in the sources
Continuity of critical servicesLISTEDnot reviewed
RecoveryLISTEDnot applicable at baseline; no event to recover from
AdaptationEXISTSanticipatory governance principles in OECD work1819
Social protectionLISTEDnot applicable at baseline
Finance and insuranceLISTEDpublic and private investment not on a common basis
Institutional coordinationEXISTSWHO, CBD and OECD processes182021
Technical infrastructureEXISTSbioindustrial institute and planning awards2324
WorkforceLISTEDskills gaps reported in policy documents; no figure bound
Research capacityADEQUATEstrong peer-reviewed base1467
A capability listed in policy is not a tested one; each rung is the strongest public evidence at baseline.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 7Watson, J.L. et al., De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion, Nature 620, 1089 to 1100, 2023 (record read via Europe PMC). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 13Strengthening nucleic acid biosecurity screening against generative protein design tools, Science 390 (6768), 82 to 87, 2025 (record read via Europe PMC; abstract only; no method detail used). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 25UNVERIFIED, not opened: Office of Science and Technology Policy (ed.), Framework for Nucleic Acid Synthesis Screening, April 2024, taken from search-result summaries; a fetch of the page was refused by the fetch tool. OSTP, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Gene Synthesis Consortium (ed.), Harmonized Screening Protocol, cited from memory. IGSC. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 32UNVERIFIED, not opened: UK Government (ed.), screening guidance on synthetic nucleic acids, 2024, cited from memory. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, London. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 20Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (ed.), Synthetic biology (programme page; decisions X/13 to 16/21; AHTEG; horizon scanning; thematic action plan). CBD Secretariat, Montreal. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 22Baker McKenzie (ed.), EU Biotech Act unveiled: Commission proposal to turn Europe into a biotech powerhouse (law firm summary, 19 December 2025; proposal of 16 December 2025; health focus; investment pilot with the European Investment Bank Group; 12-month certificate extension; biodefence measures; second act expected in Q3 2026). Secondary source, not the Commission text. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: Executive Order 14292, Improving the Safety and Security of Biological Research, 5 May 2025 (90 days to revise or replace the framework), taken from search-result summaries; a fetch of an explainer page was refused by the fetch tool. The White House, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: Congressional Research Service (ed.), report on artificial intelligence and biosecurity risks (reported in July 2026 as unable to determine whether the 2024 framework or the 2025 policy had been revised), taken from a trade news summary. Library of Congress, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 18OECD (ed.), Anticipatory governance for responsible innovation in synthetic biology, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 193, 21 May 2026 (record read via a bibliographic database; abstract only). OECD Publishing, Paris. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 21World Health Organization (ed.), Global guidance framework for the responsible use of the life sciences: mitigating biorisks and governing dual-use research (publication page, 13 September 2022). WHO, Geneva. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 16Twist Bioscience Corporation (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, results for the fiscal third quarter ended 30 June 2026 (company filing; revenue USD 118.4 million; nine months USD 332.8 million; fiscal 2026 guidance USD 456 to 457 million; company statements and guidance are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 17Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, fourth quarter and full year 2025 results (company filing of 26 February 2026; revenue USD 170.155 million against USD 227.043 million; net loss USD 312.763 million; company statements are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 24US Manufacturing Program (ed.), Bioindustrial (programme topic page; Distributed Bioindustrial Manufacturing Program awards announced 10 July to 13 September 2024; 25 awards; USD 42 million cumulative). Manufacturing USA, Gaithersburg. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 23BioMADE (ed.), DoD approves USD 87 million for newest bioindustrial manufacturing innovation institute (news page; seven years; the page shows Oct 20 and a 2023 footer, the press release is dated 2020 in search listings). BioMADE, Saint Paul. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 1Robertson, W.E. et al., Escherichia coli with a 57-codon genetic code, Science 390 (6771), eady4368, published 23 October 2025 (record read via PubMed, PMID 40743368; the record gives a 4 megabase synthetic genome and six replaced sense codons). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 11Kyrou, K. et al., A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes, Nature Biotechnology 36, 1062 to 1066, 2018 (record read via Europe PMC; laboratory cages only). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 12Confronting risks of mirror life, Science 386, 1351 to 1353, 2024 (record read via Europe PMC; the record gives only a one-line abstract calling for broad discussion). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2000, cited from memory. CBD Secretariat, Montreal. Observation year 2000. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 14Congressional Research Service (ed.), National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology: Final Report and Options for Congress, CRS Insight IN12546, 17 April 2025 (report of 8 April 2025; 49 recommendations; at least USD 15 billion over five years; National Biotechnology Coordination Office). Library of Congress, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 19OECD (ed.), Synthetic biology, AI and automation: a forward-looking technology assessment, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 187, 4 December 2025 (record read via a bibliographic database; abstract only). OECD Publishing, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 4Debugging and consolidating multiple synthetic chromosomes reveals combinatorial genetic interactions, Cell 186 (24), 5220 to 5236, 2023 (record read via Europe PMC: 6.5 synthetic chromosomes in one strain; over half of the Sc2.0 genome). Cell Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 6Nielsen, A.A.K. et al., Genetic circuit design automation, Science 352 (6281), 2016 (record read via Europe PMC: 60 circuits; 45 correct in all output states; 92% of output states as predicted). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2016. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Design capability outpaces screening and oversight

A conditional statement under stated assumptions, never a prediction.

2 min read0 figures0 tables2 notesNR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

5.1Assumptions

Scenario SCN-XT04-DSG-01: what is assumed, and what is held constant.

Baseline
the 2026 reference state in this edition
Drivers
design tools and low-cost DNA improve faster than screening practice and framework text
Analogues
the 2025 screening study and the 2025 executive order1326
Interventions
none modelled: the specification describes the unmitigated case
Run state
narrative specification; quantified run scheduled for 2027

5.2The cascade, step by step

  1. 1

    AIC → BIO

    design tools make novel sequences easier to produce

    2023

  2. 2

    DAT → SEC

    screening tools miss some redesigned sequences

    2025

  3. 3

    GOV → SEC

    framework text is revised while practice differs by provider

    2025

  4. 4

    FIN → INF

    investment concentrates in providers with in-house screening

    2026

  5. 5

    GOV → TRD

    national rules and export controls diverge

    2026

  6. 6

    BIO → HLT

    public trust in engineered products is tested

    2025

5.3The scenario as a table of steps

How the shock in scenario SCN-XT04-DSG-01 would travel through Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering’s coupled systems, step by step, under the assumptions the edition states.

StepWhat happensSource
01 AI compute to biodiversityDesign tools make novel sequences easier to produce. Analogue or source: 2023.Edition XT-04, scenario SCN-XT04-DSG-01, step 1
02 DAT to securityScreening tools miss some redesigned sequences. Analogue or source: 2025.Edition XT-04, scenario SCN-XT04-DSG-01, step 2
03 Governance to securityFramework text is revised while practice differs by provider. Analogue or source: 2025.Edition XT-04, scenario SCN-XT04-DSG-01, step 3
04 Finance to infrastructureInvestment concentrates in providers with in-house screening. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition XT-04, scenario SCN-XT04-DSG-01, step 4
05 Governance to tradeNational rules and export controls diverge. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition XT-04, scenario SCN-XT04-DSG-01, step 5
06 Biodiversity to healthPublic trust in engineered products is tested. Analogue or source: 2025.Edition XT-04, scenario SCN-XT04-DSG-01, step 6

A teaching model of a conditional scenario under the edition’s stated assumptions: not a forecast, not a prediction and not a warning. Sources: Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering 2026, scenario SCN-XT04-DSG-01 (2026); Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering 2026, references (NR-CIT-1) (2026).

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 13Strengthening nucleic acid biosecurity screening against generative protein design tools, Science 390 (6768), 82 to 87, 2025 (record read via Europe PMC; abstract only; no method detail used). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: Executive Order 14292, Improving the Safety and Security of Biological Research, 5 May 2025 (90 days to revise or replace the framework), taken from search-result summaries; a fetch of an explainer page was refused by the fetch tool. The White House, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Readings from the other desks

The synthetic biology baseline is read through each steward’s lens, then once as a whole. Each lens is a projection of reviewed findings, not a separate argument. The other desks’ own editions of this subject are listed first, as cross-references, not copies.

16 min read0 figures8 tables40 notesNR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

6.1The other desks’ editions of this subject

Federation: each desk writes its own edition for the subjects in its remit. Until a desk releases, its edition shows its frame and the reading this edition printed for it.

DeskEditionStateIdentifier
GCRI Systems EvidenceNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
GRF Public DeliberationOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
GRA Capital ReadinessOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
Standards ProgressNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
Academy CapabilityNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
Index MeasurementOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit

6.2Three lenses

One edition, read by each steward. The lens of this site comes first.

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports reading synthetic biology as a build capability, a manufacturing base and a governance test. Build results are strong on single organisms, risk evidence is newer, and the physical footprint is unmeasured. Evidence is strongest for peer-reviewed results and weakest for energy, capacity and screening coverage.

BLD-001 · SEC-005 · GOV-007 · SYS-012

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people synthetic biology arrives as a medicine, a food label or a warning about misuse. The baseline asks that public debate separate peer-reviewed results from company statements and plans, and keep oversight of both benefit and risk in view.

CLN-004 · SEC-005 · SEC-006

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. Company results are mixed and public programmes are at the planning stage161724. These show where finance-readiness evidence will matter. Nothing here is advice, a rating or an approval.

FIN-011 · GOV-008

NEXUS

Synthesis

Synthetic biology is well described by single results and thinly measured as a system. The 2027 programme should count screening coverage, publish a comparable footprint and test the design and screening gap before the next framework revision.

SYS-012 · Q-01 · Q-02

6.3Standards, Academy and steward contributions

How the Nexus Standards drafts, the Risk Academy and the three stewards feed each quarterly edition for synthetic biology. The standards are a preparatory working draft (2026) and are cited as drafts, never as adopted standards.

Table 6.1The quarterly rhythm every edition follows
QuarterEditionQuestionBoundary
Q1State and AgendaWhat matters this year, and what is the starting position?observed baseline stays distinct from planned work
Q2Evidence and BuildWhat new evidence and capability exist?a configured capability is not a validated result
Q3Stress Test and ReadinessWhat do scenarios and tests show?simulated loss or performance is not observed impact
Q4Annual Synthesis and RenewalWhat changed in the year, and what renews?release follows review, not event publicity deadlines
Table 6.2Who contributes what each quarter
Steward or bodyRoleContribution route
GCRI CanadaLead Institution and Consortium Secretariat; publisher of record; technical truth (key T)science and practice communities · GCRI gateway
The Global Risks Forum (GRF)leadership, dialogue and the Universe programme; public meaning (key M)policy, Universe and national adoption · GRF gateway
The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)finance, insurance and development readiness; capital meaning (key F)finance and insurance · GRA gateway
Nexus Standardspreparatory drafts on vocabulary, hazards, indicators and methodsStandards site · working groups HAZ, IND, MTH, FIN, AI
Risk Academylearning pathways tied to the agenda questionsAcademy gateway · learning by review
Nexus Standards and Academytechnology chapter inputs: GCRI evidence, NXS standards, RA capabilitytechnology editorial board

Standards drafts used in this edition

  • Risk vocabulary NRS-C1 (424 terms) for terms in the glossary
  • Hazard atlas NHS-1 1.1.0 (905 hazards in 120 families) for risk objects
  • Seven risk classes: global, catastrophic, existential, emerging, planetary, exponential, frontier-tech

Standards calendar to watch

  • Founding calls from 20 October 2026; working groups meet from 5 November 2026
  • Inaugural Global Standards Council session, 12 January 2027
  • Quarterly reviews in March, June, September and December, aligned with each edition

6.4GCRI reading: the model card

GCRI’s reading of this edition is its model card: what the national model is, what it computes and where it stops. It is printed in full in Annex A, with the methods it belongs to. Annex A, methodology

6.5Global Risks Forum reading: editorial essays

Four signed essays by the Reports editorial team set out the positions this edition takes. They are interpretation, labelled as such; the evidence they draw on is in the findings register.

Synthetic biology is a build capability, a manufacturing base and a governance test. The first is advancing fast, the second is thinly measured and the third is unevenly implemented. Keeping them apart avoids both hype and alarm.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 01

Three stories, one field

A peer-reviewed experiment, a policy proposal and a company announcement carry different weight. This edition labels each, and treats company revenue and guidance as weak evidence.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 02

Separate results, plans and statements

Feedstock, energy, water, DNA supply and capacity are rarely counted. A published footprint would show whether scale is limited by biology, supply or money.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 03

The footprint is the blind spot

Screening and dual-use frameworks were written before generative design tools. Evidence shows gaps and fixes, and the work is practice, coverage and shared text across jurisdictions.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 04

Oversight has to keep pace with design

6.6Global Risks Alliance reading: 2027 synthetic biology readiness pack

The registers that open the 2027 global cycle. At baseline each is initialised from this edition.

Table 6.32027 synthetic biology readiness pack
ItemRegisterState at baselineFirst 2027 entry
E1Synthetic biology risk state deltabaseline set by this editionchanges against the baseline
E2WEFH+B state deltafive global system readings setindicator updates and freshness
E3Agenda and Portfolio movementeight agenda items · 6 proposed objectsadmission decisions
E4Federation delivery registernational chapters in preparationnational chapters
E5Consortium capability registernational consortia formingfirst contributions
E6Leadership questions and challengesnone yetfirst challenge log
E7Foundry technical statenational environments preparedfirst federation cut
E8Publication candidatestwelve findings carried forwardPUBLISH · HOLD dispositions
E9Universe readinessone candidate missionadmission and role spine
E10Correction registernonefirst federation-wide cycle

Publication dispositions

  • Publish
  • Hold
  • Needs evidence
  • Restricted
  • Superseded

6.7Nexus Standards reading: standards and regulatory watch

Instruments and published guidance that shape the systems in this edition, by status on the retrieval date. The edition assesses no one’s compliance.

  • IN FORCE
  • PUBLISHED
  • DRAFT
  • PUBLISHED · VOLUNTARY
Table 6.4Standards and regulatory watch
InstrumentBodyScopeStatusRelevance
Global guidance framework for the life sciences21WHOglobalPUBLISHED 2022dual-use governance
Framework for nucleic acid synthesis screening25OSTPUSPUBLISHED 2024screening; status after 2025 order unclear
Executive Order 1429226US PresidentUSIN FORCE 2025research safety and framework revision
Harmonised screening protocol31IGSCindustry, globalPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYscreening practice
Screening guidance for synthetic nucleic acids32UK GovernmentUKPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYscreening practice
ISO 20688-2 on gene synthesis36ISOglobalPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYproduction requirements
Biotech Act proposal2228European CommissionEUDRAFThealth biotechnology and biodefence
CBD decisions 15/31 and 16/2120CBD partiesglobalPUBLISHEDhorizon scanning and action plan
Cartagena Protocol35CBD partiesglobalIN FORCEliving modified organisms
Biological Weapons Convention34States PartiesglobalIN FORCEprohibition

Changed since 2024

  • The EU proposed a Biotech Act on 16 December 202522
  • The OECD published its anticipatory governance paper on 21 May 202618
  • The US executive order of May 2025 set a 90-day deadline for a revised screening framework26

To watch in 2027

  • The EU second Biotech Act, expected in the third quarter of 202629
  • The CBD thematic action plan for COP-1720
  • Any replacement US screening framework2527

6.8Risk Academy reading: literature and evidence review, science and assessments

The review behind this edition covers synthetic biology assessments, peer-reviewed science and the institutional reports that bind its findings. Systematic reviews for each agenda item begin in 2027.

Review protocol

Question
What does the published evidence establish about synthetic biology and bioengineering as infrastructure and its couplings?
Sources searched
peer-reviewed journals; regulator and agency pages; policy papers; company filings
Window
releases available at evidence close, 30 September 2026
Selection
sources that bind or contextualise a finding in this edition
Next step
systematic reviews for agenda items 01 to 05 in 2027
Table 6.5Peer-reviewed science
ReferenceTypeYearRoleUsed for
Robertson et al.1journal article2025supportsrecoded genome
Fredens et al.3journal article2019supportsrecoded genome
Sc2.0 consortium paper4journal article2023supportssynthetic yeast
Gibson et al.5journal article2010contextfirst synthetic cell
Nielsen et al.6journal article2016supportscircuit design
Watson et al.7journal article2023supportsprotein design
Frangoul et al.8journal article2024supportscell therapy
Musunuru et al.10journal article2025contextpatient-specific therapy
Table 6.6Foundational methods
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Kyrou et al.11journal article2018contextgene drive
Mirror life policy forum12journal article2024contextrisk discussion
Screening study13journal article2025supportsscreening gaps
Jinek et al.38journal article2012frameworkCRISPR programmable cutting
Gibson et al.39journal article2009frameworkDNA assembly
Ro et al.40journal article2006frameworkengineered yeast production
Elowitz and Leibler41journal article2000frameworksynthetic oscillator
Gardner, Cantor and Collins42journal article2000frameworkgenetic toggle switch
Richardson et al.43journal article2017frameworksynthetic yeast design
Table 6.7Standards, policy and governance
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
US commission report, CRS note14Congressional Research Service2025supportsrecommendations
OECD anticipatory governance18OECD2026supportsgovernance
OECD technology assessment19OECD2025supportsconvergence and risks
CBD synthetic biology page20CBD secretariat2026supportsdecisions
WHO framework21WHO2022supportsdual-use guidance
Biodefense report33National Academies2018contextbiodefence background
EU proposal summary22law firm summary2025contextproposal content
Table 6.8Industry, funding and field overviews
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
FAS commentary15Federation of American Scientists2025contextbioeconomy figures
Twist Bioscience filing16company2026contextweak signal
Ginkgo Bioworks filing17company2026contextweak signal
BioMADE page23institute2020contextinfrastructure
Programme page24US manufacturing programme2024supportsplanning awards
Bio Revolution report37McKinsey2020contexteconomy

Where the evidence agrees

  • Whole-genome design and writing works at the scale of one organism134
  • Screening tools need updating for machine-designed sequences13
  • Governance is moving but implementation is uneven1418

Where it is unsettled

  • Whether screening practice and framework text keep pace with design tools132627
  • How large the energy, water and feedstock footprint of manufacturing will be2437
  • How company results map to the health of the sector1617

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 16Twist Bioscience Corporation (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, results for the fiscal third quarter ended 30 June 2026 (company filing; revenue USD 118.4 million; nine months USD 332.8 million; fiscal 2026 guidance USD 456 to 457 million; company statements and guidance are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 17Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, fourth quarter and full year 2025 results (company filing of 26 February 2026; revenue USD 170.155 million against USD 227.043 million; net loss USD 312.763 million; company statements are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 24US Manufacturing Program (ed.), Bioindustrial (programme topic page; Distributed Bioindustrial Manufacturing Program awards announced 10 July to 13 September 2024; 25 awards; USD 42 million cumulative). Manufacturing USA, Gaithersburg. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 21World Health Organization (ed.), Global guidance framework for the responsible use of the life sciences: mitigating biorisks and governing dual-use research (publication page, 13 September 2022). WHO, Geneva. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 25UNVERIFIED, not opened: Office of Science and Technology Policy (ed.), Framework for Nucleic Acid Synthesis Screening, April 2024, taken from search-result summaries; a fetch of the page was refused by the fetch tool. OSTP, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: Executive Order 14292, Improving the Safety and Security of Biological Research, 5 May 2025 (90 days to revise or replace the framework), taken from search-result summaries; a fetch of an explainer page was refused by the fetch tool. The White House, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Gene Synthesis Consortium (ed.), Harmonized Screening Protocol, cited from memory. IGSC. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 32UNVERIFIED, not opened: UK Government (ed.), screening guidance on synthetic nucleic acids, 2024, cited from memory. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, London. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Organization for Standardization (ed.), ISO 20688-2, requirements for the production and quality control of synthesised gene fragments, genes and genome-scale constructs, cited from memory. ISO, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 22Baker McKenzie (ed.), EU Biotech Act unveiled: Commission proposal to turn Europe into a biotech powerhouse (law firm summary, 19 December 2025; proposal of 16 December 2025; health focus; investment pilot with the European Investment Bank Group; 12-month certificate extension; biodefence measures; second act expected in Q3 2026). Secondary source, not the Commission text. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Commission (ed.), Proposal for a Biotech Act, COM(2025) 1022, 16 December 2025, taken from law firm and regulator summaries; the Commission page was not retrieved. European Commission, Brussels. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 20Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (ed.), Synthetic biology (programme page; decisions X/13 to 16/21; AHTEG; horizon scanning; thematic action plan). CBD Secretariat, Montreal. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2000, cited from memory. CBD Secretariat, Montreal. Observation year 2000. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 34UNVERIFIED, not opened: Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction, 1972, cited from memory. United Nations, Geneva. Observation year 1972. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 18OECD (ed.), Anticipatory governance for responsible innovation in synthetic biology, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 193, 21 May 2026 (record read via a bibliographic database; abstract only). OECD Publishing, Paris. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 29UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Parliament (ed.), Legislative train entry for the European Biotech Act II (second act expected in the third quarter of 2026), taken from a search-result summary; the page returned no content. European Parliament, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: Congressional Research Service (ed.), report on artificial intelligence and biosecurity risks (reported in July 2026 as unable to determine whether the 2024 framework or the 2025 policy had been revised), taken from a trade news summary. Library of Congress, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 1Robertson, W.E. et al., Escherichia coli with a 57-codon genetic code, Science 390 (6771), eady4368, published 23 October 2025 (record read via PubMed, PMID 40743368; the record gives a 4 megabase synthetic genome and six replaced sense codons). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 3Fredens, J. et al., Total synthesis of Escherichia coli with a recoded genome, Nature 569 (7757), 514 to 518, 2019 (record read via Europe PMC: 18,214 codons recoded; 61-codon genome). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 4Debugging and consolidating multiple synthetic chromosomes reveals combinatorial genetic interactions, Cell 186 (24), 5220 to 5236, 2023 (record read via Europe PMC: 6.5 synthetic chromosomes in one strain; over half of the Sc2.0 genome). Cell Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 5Gibson, D.G. et al., Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesised genome, Science 329 (5987), 52 to 56, 2010 (record read via Europe PMC: 1.08 million base pair genome). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2010. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 6Nielsen, A.A.K. et al., Genetic circuit design automation, Science 352 (6281), 2016 (record read via Europe PMC: 60 circuits; 45 correct in all output states; 92% of output states as predicted). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2016. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 7Watson, J.L. et al., De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion, Nature 620, 1089 to 1100, 2023 (record read via Europe PMC). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  24. 8Frangoul, H. et al., Exagamglogene autotemcel for severe sickle cell disease, New England Journal of Medicine 390 (18), 1649 to 1662, 2024 (record read via Europe PMC: 44 treated; 29 of 30 evaluable free of severe crises for 12 months; median follow-up 19.3 months). Massachusetts Medical Society, Waltham. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  25. 10Musunuru, K. et al., Patient-specific in vivo gene editing to treat a rare genetic disease, New England Journal of Medicine 392 (22), 2235 to 2243, 2025 (record read via Europe PMC: one infant; two infusions at about 7 and 8 months). Massachusetts Medical Society, Waltham. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  26. 11Kyrou, K. et al., A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes, Nature Biotechnology 36, 1062 to 1066, 2018 (record read via Europe PMC; laboratory cages only). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  27. 12Confronting risks of mirror life, Science 386, 1351 to 1353, 2024 (record read via Europe PMC; the record gives only a one-line abstract calling for broad discussion). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  28. 13Strengthening nucleic acid biosecurity screening against generative protein design tools, Science 390 (6768), 82 to 87, 2025 (record read via Europe PMC; abstract only; no method detail used). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  29. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: Jinek, M. et al., A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity, Science 337, 816 to 821, 2012, cited from memory. Observation year 2012. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  30. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Gibson, D.G. et al., Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases, Nature Methods 6, 343 to 345, 2009, cited from memory. Observation year 2009. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  31. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: Ro, D.-K. et al., Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast, Nature 440, 940 to 943, 2006, cited from memory. Observation year 2006. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  32. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: Elowitz, M.B. and Leibler, S., A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators, Nature 403, 335 to 338, 2000, cited from memory. Observation year 2000. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  33. 42UNVERIFIED, not opened: Gardner, T.S., Cantor, C.R. and Collins, J.J., Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli, Nature 403, 339 to 342, 2000, cited from memory. Observation year 2000. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  34. 43UNVERIFIED, not opened: Richardson, S.M. et al., Design of a synthetic yeast genome, Science 355, 1040 to 1044, 2017, cited from memory. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  35. 14Congressional Research Service (ed.), National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology: Final Report and Options for Congress, CRS Insight IN12546, 17 April 2025 (report of 8 April 2025; 49 recommendations; at least USD 15 billion over five years; National Biotechnology Coordination Office). Library of Congress, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  36. 19OECD (ed.), Synthetic biology, AI and automation: a forward-looking technology assessment, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 187, 4 December 2025 (record read via a bibliographic database; abstract only). OECD Publishing, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  37. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (eds.), Biodefense in the Age of Synthetic Biology, 2018, cited from memory; a fetch returned an unrelated page. National Academies Press, Washington. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  38. 15Federation of American Scientists (ed.), Translating Vision into Action: FAS commentary on the NSCEB final report (commentary page; six pillars; cites over USD 210 billion of US GDP and over 640,000 jobs for the bioeconomy; secondary and advocacy-leaning source). Federation of American Scientists, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  39. 23BioMADE (ed.), DoD approves USD 87 million for newest bioindustrial manufacturing innovation institute (news page; seven years; the page shows Oct 20 and a 2023 footer, the press release is dated 2020 in search listings). BioMADE, Saint Paul. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  40. 37UNVERIFIED, not opened: McKinsey Global Institute (ed.), The Bio Revolution: Innovations transforming economies, societies, and our lives, May 2020, cited from memory; the fetch returned a service error and no figure is used. McKinsey and Company, New York. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

The 2027 agenda

Eight bounded questions open the 2027 synthetic biology agenda. Each comes from a baseline finding, names the initiative that will carry it and the first output due in the 2027 synthetic biology edition.

5 min read0 figures6 tables4 notesNR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

7.1Questions for the operational series

  1. Q-01

    How well do synthesis providers screen orders, and how do practices differ by country?

    INI-XT04-SCR-01 · screening coverage; first output: screening practice register.

  2. Q-02

    What do fermentation and cell-free manufacturing need in energy, water and feedstock at commercial scale?

    INI-XT04-ENE-02 · manufacturing footprint; first output: footprint estimates by process.

  3. Q-03

    Which DNA synthesis, instrument and reagent steps are single points of failure?

    INI-XT04-SUP-03 · DNA supply chain; first output: dependence map.

  4. Q-04

    How much biofoundry and bioindustrial capacity exists, and where?

    INI-XT04-CAP-04 · manufacturing capacity; first output: capacity table.

  5. Q-05

    How can public and private investment in synthetic biology be counted on one basis?

    INI-XT04-FIN-05 · investment on a common basis; first output: investment table.

  6. Q-06

    Which national frameworks set screening or oversight rules, and how do they differ?

    To be admitted in 2027; first output: framework overlay.

  7. Q-07

    What workforce exists for design, biofoundry operation and biosafety oversight?

    To be admitted in 2027; first output: scoping note.

  8. Q-08

    Which readiness capabilities have been tested in real incidents, and which are only planned?

    Readiness capability register; first output: rung evidence for 15 functions.

7.2Portfolio proposed for the Q1 2027 alignment

Five initiatives and one Universe mission candidate are proposed for the 2027 synthetic biology portfolio. They are programme objects: no partner, funder or member is attached to them in this edition.

Table 7.1Objects proposed for the first operational quarter
IDObjectKindQuestionState
INI-XT04-SCR-01Screening coverageInitiativeQ-01PROPOSED
INI-XT04-ENE-02Manufacturing footprintInitiativeQ-02PROPOSED
INI-XT04-SUP-03DNA supply chainInitiativeQ-03PROPOSED
INI-XT04-CAP-04Manufacturing capacityInitiativeQ-04PROPOSED
INI-XT04-FIN-05Investment on a common basisInitiativeQ-05PROPOSED
MSN-XT04-2027-01Design and screening Universe missionMissionQ-01Candidate

7.3The pathway

The synthetic biology edition reads national readiness chapters, the coupled sector reports on health, food and biosecurity, and the global edition through one governed evidence graph. At baseline the federation is designed; the global energy, health and food editions are drafted. This page states what exists today and what comes next.

  1. 01

    National readiness chapters

    biotechnology and biosecurity readiness in each national edition

    IN PREPARATION · national baselines

  2. 02

    Sector couplings

    GS-03 food · GS-04 health · XT-05 genomics · SR-08 biosecurity

    GS-04 DRAFTED · sector baselines

  3. 03

    Technology system model

    platforms, DNA supply, manufacturing, workforce, governance

    v0 SPECIFIED · v1 with federation evidence

  4. 04

    Strategic links

    SR-08 health security · SR-13 strategic technology

    PLANNED · strategic baselines

  5. 05

    Universe

    annual proving environment

    CANDIDATE MISSION · mandate in 2027

  6. 06

    XT-04 report

    this series

    BASELINE DRAFT · 2027 annual edition

  7. 07

    Evidence and correction

    one graph, many projections

    OPEN · first correction cycle in 2027

7.4Universe 2027: evidence pack for the synthetic biology candidate mission

  1. 01

    Mandate

  2. 02

    Core Build · 1 month

  3. 03

    Action · 1 week

  4. 04

    Evidence seal

  5. 05

    Portfolio correction

  6. 06

    Next mandate

Table 7.2Universe 2027: evidence pack for the synthetic biology candidate mission
ItemRecordStateTiming
F1Annual mandate recordPLANNEDafter the Q2 2027 alignment
F2Core Build recordPLANNEDone month before the exercise
F3Exercise evidencePLANNEDduring the Action week
F4Decision packetsPLANNEDexercise state only
F5Proof receiptsPLANNEDscoped to each recorded check
F6After-action reportPLANNEDwithin one quarter
F7Upgrade docketPLANNEDrouted to the Portfolio
F8Portfolio renewalPLANNED2027 global annual edition
F9Public synthesisPLANNEDpublic-safe extracts only

Mission

ID
MSN-XT04-2027-01 · Design and screening Universe mission
Role spine
Leadership sponsor · Institutional anchor · Mission lead: drawn from national pathways
Receiving actors
to be identified with the mandate

7.5Handoffs and routing

Where the baseline’s findings go next. A handoff routes a finding for awareness, review or work; it transfers no authority.

Table 7.3Handoffs and routing
FindingRouted toPurposeClass
BLD-001 · recoded genomesINI-XT04-CAP-04manufacturing capacityPUBLIC
CLN-004 · engineered therapiesINI-XT04-FIN-05investment on a common basisPUBLIC
SEC-005 · screening gapsINI-XT04-SCR-01screening coveragePUBLIC
GOV-007 · US frameworkregional consortiaframework overlayPUBLIC
GOV-009 · EU proposalregional consortiaframework overlayPUBLIC
GOV-010 · OECD and CBDINI-XT04-SUP-03DNA supply chainPUBLIC
FIN-011 · company filingsINI-XT04-ENE-02 · key F reviewmanufacturing footprintPUBLIC
SYS-012 · compound pathwayMSN-XT04-2027-01Universe candidateCONSORTIUM
Table 7.4Routing rules by publication class
ClassWhere it goesWho can see it
PUBLICthe published edition and its evidence bundleanyone
CONSORTIUMgoverned rooms of the federationconsortium members under agreement
CONTROLLEDneed-to-know channelsnamed competent actors only

7.6Feeds and signal register

Table 7.5Feeds watched from 2027
FeedProducerLatencyFeeds into
Journals and preprint servers on genome writing and designpeer review and preprintscontinuousBLD-001
Regulator announcements on engineered therapiesUS Food and Drug Administrationper eventCLN-004
Screening and dual-use policy pagesagencies and industry consortiaper releaseSEC-005
EU Biotech Act pagesEuropean Commissionper releaseGOV-009
OECD science and technology policy papersOECDper releaseGOV-010
Company earnings releasesTwist Bioscience, Ginkgo BioworksquarterlyFIN-011
CBD synthetic biology pageCBD secretariatper meetingGOV-010

Escalation routes

  • none · keep monitoring
  • research question
  • project
  • risk object
  • annual publication
  • signal report
Table 7.6Signals at baseline
IDSignalCorroborationSystemsRoute
SIG-XT04-001A 57-codon genetic code was reported in 20251CORROBORATEDBLDresearch question Q-05
SIG-XT04-002Screening tools missed redesigned sequences in a 2025 study13PARTIALSEC · DATresearch question Q-01
SIG-XT04-003No public replacement for the US framework was found2627PARTIALGOVresearch question Q-06

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1Robertson, W.E. et al., Escherichia coli with a 57-codon genetic code, Science 390 (6771), eady4368, published 23 October 2025 (record read via PubMed, PMID 40743368; the record gives a 4 megabase synthetic genome and six replaced sense codons). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 13Strengthening nucleic acid biosecurity screening against generative protein design tools, Science 390 (6768), 82 to 87, 2025 (record read via Europe PMC; abstract only; no method detail used). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: Executive Order 14292, Improving the Safety and Security of Biological Research, 5 May 2025 (90 days to revise or replace the framework), taken from search-result summaries; a fetch of an explainer page was refused by the fetch tool. The White House, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: Congressional Research Service (ed.), report on artificial intelligence and biosecurity risks (reported in July 2026 as unable to determine whether the 2024 framework or the 2025 policy had been revised), taken from a trade news summary. Library of Congress, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Systems in depth

One section per system: its state at evidence close, its exposures and what the operational series will watch.

10 min read0 figures5 tables25 notesNR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

8.1Genome, circuit and protein design platforms

Biological design now spans whole genomes, genetic circuits and designed proteins. Evidence is strongest where peer review exists and weakest for industrial performance.

57codons

Syn57 genetic code2

60circuits

built by one design tool, 20166

6.5chromosomes

synthetic yeast in one strain4

Table 8.1State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Recoded bacterial genomesa 57-codon code reported in 2025; 61 codons in 2019123Reported
Synthetic yeastsix and a half chromosomes combined in one strain443Reported
Circuit design software45 of 60 circuits worked in every output state6Reported
Protein design softwaregenerative binder design tested by structure7Reported

Couplings

  • AIC → BIO design tools
  • DAT → BIO sequence data
  • FIN → BIO funding

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • industrial performance of engineered strains
  • cost of genome synthesis

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-04 Health and One Health
  • GS-03 Food and Agrifood Systems
  • XT-05 Genomics and Gene Editing
  • SR-08 Health Security, One Health and Biosecurity
  • XT-01 Artificial Intelligence and Agentic Systems

8.2Energy, water and feedstock for biomanufacturing

Fermentation and cell-free production need energy, process water and sugar or other feedstock. No source read counts them on a common basis.

0figures

bound for energy, water and feedstock in this edition

25awards

US planning awards for bioindustrial plants, 202424

87USD million

US institute award over seven years23

Table 8.2State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Process energynot published on a common basis; no figure used24Expert input
Process waternot published on a common basis; no figure used24Expert input
Feedstockdemand not bound; economy-level reports not opened37Expert input
Siting and planningUS awards fund plant planning, not construction24Reported

Couplings

  • ENE ↔ BIO process energy
  • WAT → BIO process water
  • FOO → BIO feedstock

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • energy, water and feedstock per tonne of product
  • plant counts and utilisation

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-04 Health and One Health
  • GS-03 Food and Agrifood Systems
  • XT-05 Genomics and Gene Editing
  • SR-08 Health Security, One Health and Biosecurity
  • XT-01 Artificial Intelligence and Agentic Systems

8.3DNA, instruments and manufacturing capacity

The build base starts with synthesised DNA, instruments and reagents and ends in pilot and commercial plants. Public sources count programmes more than capacity.

332.8USD million

Twist Bioscience revenue, nine months to 30 June 202616

48%

share of Twist third-quarter revenue from DNA synthesis and protein solutions, derived16

42USD million

US planning awards to September 202424

Table 8.3State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
DNA synthesisone provider reports USD 56.6 million for the segment in one quarter16Reported
Instruments and reagentsdependence not documented in the sources read36Expert input
InstituteUSD 87 million over seven years for a manufacturing institute23Reported
Plant capacitynot counted in the sources read24Expert input

Couplings

  • MIN → BIO reagents
  • TRD → BIO export controls
  • FIN → INF plants

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • synthesis capacity by provider and country
  • instrument and reagent dependence

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-04 Health and One Health
  • GS-03 Food and Agrifood Systems
  • XT-05 Genomics and Gene Editing
  • SR-08 Health Security, One Health and Biosecurity
  • XT-01 Artificial Intelligence and Agentic Systems

8.4Economy, investment and workforce

Company results are mixed and the sector has no common investment series. Workforce numbers are the thinnest part of the evidence.

170.2USD million

Ginkgo Bioworks revenue, 202517

227.0USD million

Ginkgo Bioworks revenue, 202417

15USD billion

minimum funding recommended by a US commission14

Table 8.4State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Company revenueGinkgo fell about 25% in 2025; Twist guided to USD 456 to 457 million for fiscal 20261617Reported
Public programmesUS commission recommends at least USD 15 billion over five years; a recommendation14Reported
Bioeconomy sizecommentary cites over USD 210 billion of US GDP; secondary figure15Reported
Workforceskills gaps reported in policy; no figure bound14Expert input

Couplings

  • FIN → BIO scale-up
  • HLT → BIO clinical demand
  • FIN → INF plants

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • investment on a common basis
  • workforce size and skills gaps

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-04 Health and One Health
  • GS-03 Food and Agrifood Systems
  • XT-05 Genomics and Gene Editing
  • SR-08 Health Security, One Health and Biosecurity
  • XT-01 Artificial Intelligence and Agentic Systems

8.5Biosecurity and governance watch

The nearest governance test is whether screening and oversight keep pace with design tools. Frameworks exist, and their status and implementation differ by jurisdiction.

49recommendations

US commission report, 202514

90days

deadline in the 2025 order for a revised screening framework26

2022framework

WHO global guidance on dual-use life sciences21

Table 8.5State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Screeninga 2025 study found tools often missed redesigned sequences; patches helped13Reported
US framework2024 framework; 2025 order; current status unclear in sources read252627Reported
EUBiotech Act proposal of 16 December 2025 with biodefence measures2228Reported
GlobalWHO guidance, CBD decisions, OECD papers, Cartagena Protocol18202135Reported

Couplings

  • DAT → BIO sequence data
  • GOV → SEC screening rules
  • GOV → TRD export controls

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • screening coverage by provider
  • text of the current US framework

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-04 Health and One Health
  • GS-03 Food and Agrifood Systems
  • XT-05 Genomics and Gene Editing
  • SR-08 Health Security, One Health and Biosecurity
  • XT-01 Artificial Intelligence and Agentic Systems

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 2MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (ed.), Syn57 represents a new chapter in the genetic code of life (news page, 1 August 2025; over 101,000 codons recoded; 64 to 57 codons; genome of about 4 megabases built from 38 fragments of about 100 kilobases). MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 6Nielsen, A.A.K. et al., Genetic circuit design automation, Science 352 (6281), 2016 (record read via Europe PMC: 60 circuits; 45 correct in all output states; 92% of output states as predicted). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2016. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 4Debugging and consolidating multiple synthetic chromosomes reveals combinatorial genetic interactions, Cell 186 (24), 5220 to 5236, 2023 (record read via Europe PMC: 6.5 synthetic chromosomes in one strain; over half of the Sc2.0 genome). Cell Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 1Robertson, W.E. et al., Escherichia coli with a 57-codon genetic code, Science 390 (6771), eady4368, published 23 October 2025 (record read via PubMed, PMID 40743368; the record gives a 4 megabase synthetic genome and six replaced sense codons). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 3Fredens, J. et al., Total synthesis of Escherichia coli with a recoded genome, Nature 569 (7757), 514 to 518, 2019 (record read via Europe PMC: 18,214 codons recoded; 61-codon genome). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 43UNVERIFIED, not opened: Richardson, S.M. et al., Design of a synthetic yeast genome, Science 355, 1040 to 1044, 2017, cited from memory. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 7Watson, J.L. et al., De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion, Nature 620, 1089 to 1100, 2023 (record read via Europe PMC). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 24US Manufacturing Program (ed.), Bioindustrial (programme topic page; Distributed Bioindustrial Manufacturing Program awards announced 10 July to 13 September 2024; 25 awards; USD 42 million cumulative). Manufacturing USA, Gaithersburg. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 23BioMADE (ed.), DoD approves USD 87 million for newest bioindustrial manufacturing innovation institute (news page; seven years; the page shows Oct 20 and a 2023 footer, the press release is dated 2020 in search listings). BioMADE, Saint Paul. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 37UNVERIFIED, not opened: McKinsey Global Institute (ed.), The Bio Revolution: Innovations transforming economies, societies, and our lives, May 2020, cited from memory; the fetch returned a service error and no figure is used. McKinsey and Company, New York. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 16Twist Bioscience Corporation (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, results for the fiscal third quarter ended 30 June 2026 (company filing; revenue USD 118.4 million; nine months USD 332.8 million; fiscal 2026 guidance USD 456 to 457 million; company statements and guidance are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Organization for Standardization (ed.), ISO 20688-2, requirements for the production and quality control of synthesised gene fragments, genes and genome-scale constructs, cited from memory. ISO, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 17Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, fourth quarter and full year 2025 results (company filing of 26 February 2026; revenue USD 170.155 million against USD 227.043 million; net loss USD 312.763 million; company statements are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 14Congressional Research Service (ed.), National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology: Final Report and Options for Congress, CRS Insight IN12546, 17 April 2025 (report of 8 April 2025; 49 recommendations; at least USD 15 billion over five years; National Biotechnology Coordination Office). Library of Congress, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 15Federation of American Scientists (ed.), Translating Vision into Action: FAS commentary on the NSCEB final report (commentary page; six pillars; cites over USD 210 billion of US GDP and over 640,000 jobs for the bioeconomy; secondary and advocacy-leaning source). Federation of American Scientists, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: Executive Order 14292, Improving the Safety and Security of Biological Research, 5 May 2025 (90 days to revise or replace the framework), taken from search-result summaries; a fetch of an explainer page was refused by the fetch tool. The White House, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 21World Health Organization (ed.), Global guidance framework for the responsible use of the life sciences: mitigating biorisks and governing dual-use research (publication page, 13 September 2022). WHO, Geneva. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 13Strengthening nucleic acid biosecurity screening against generative protein design tools, Science 390 (6768), 82 to 87, 2025 (record read via Europe PMC; abstract only; no method detail used). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 25UNVERIFIED, not opened: Office of Science and Technology Policy (ed.), Framework for Nucleic Acid Synthesis Screening, April 2024, taken from search-result summaries; a fetch of the page was refused by the fetch tool. OSTP, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: Congressional Research Service (ed.), report on artificial intelligence and biosecurity risks (reported in July 2026 as unable to determine whether the 2024 framework or the 2025 policy had been revised), taken from a trade news summary. Library of Congress, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 22Baker McKenzie (ed.), EU Biotech Act unveiled: Commission proposal to turn Europe into a biotech powerhouse (law firm summary, 19 December 2025; proposal of 16 December 2025; health focus; investment pilot with the European Investment Bank Group; 12-month certificate extension; biodefence measures; second act expected in Q3 2026). Secondary source, not the Commission text. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Commission (ed.), Proposal for a Biotech Act, COM(2025) 1022, 16 December 2025, taken from law firm and regulator summaries; the Commission page was not retrieved. European Commission, Brussels. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 18OECD (ed.), Anticipatory governance for responsible innovation in synthetic biology, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 193, 21 May 2026 (record read via a bibliographic database; abstract only). OECD Publishing, Paris. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  24. 20Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (ed.), Synthetic biology (programme page; decisions X/13 to 16/21; AHTEG; horizon scanning; thematic action plan). CBD Secretariat, Montreal. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  25. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2000, cited from memory. CBD Secretariat, Montreal. Observation year 2000. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Methodology

How the edition was made: methods, the model card, the evidence cut and its age, the acceptance record and the glossary.

14 min read0 figures13 tables17 notesNR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

A.1Methods

The global baseline uses published values and four simple derivations. Each is shown in full so that any reader can reproduce it.

Table A.1Methods
No.DerivationCalculationResult
(1)Fall in codons from the standard code to Syn5764 minus 577 codons
(2)Growth in recoded codons, Syn57 against Syn61 (lower bound)101,000 ÷ 18,214about 5.5 times
(3)Change in Ginkgo Bioworks revenue, 2024 to 2025(170.155 minus 227.043) ÷ 227.043about minus 25%
(4)Share of Twist Bioscience third-quarter revenue from DNA synthesis and protein solutions56.6 ÷ 118.4about 48%
Table A.2Coupling strength scale (matrix and model card)
StrengthDefinition
STRONGa disruption in the source system has historically changed the target system’s service or output within one season, in more than one region
MODERATEan effect is documented but buffered or slower
WEAKan effect is plausible but not documented at global scale
Table A.3Status grammar
LabelRule
Reportedvalue as issued by its source, with year
Inferredreasoned from cited evidence; never a measurement
EstimatedNexus analytical value with stated method
Scenarioconditional on stated assumptions
Expert inputstructured editorial judgement awaiting evidence

A.2Model card, Synthetic biology System Model v0

Model ID
MDL-XT04-SYNBIO · v0.1
Purpose
represent synthetic biology as a build capability and manufacturing base coupled to health, food, energy, feedstock, finance, workforce and biosecurity
Family
graph-based system of systems
Inputs
the cited sources of this edition; no proprietary data
Method
expert-specified coupling strengths (STRONG · MODERATE · WEAK) from assessments and analogue events
Validation
none yet, first validation against federation evidence in 2027
Uncertainty
qualitative; strengths are hypotheses, not measurements
Domain of validity
global scale; not for asset-, site- or country-level use
Reproducibility
strength table and sources published in this edition
20couplings

typed in v0

0strong

documented within one season

1moderate

documented, buffered

19weak

plausible, undocumented

A.3The baseline evidence cut

Every Nexus edition is published from a frozen evidence cut. The global baseline cut is documentary: it pins the exact edition of every source cited. Federation cuts begin with the first national Foundry cuts in 2027.

Cut ID
DC-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Type
baseline documentary cut
Resolution policy
pinned · as of 30 September 2026
Sources pinned
44 cited sources, each at the edition and access date in the references
Model runs
none at baseline, analytical values are stated with their method
Digest
computed at freeze and recorded in the publication record
Supersedes
nothing, first cut of the series
Superseded by
the 2027 synthetic biology annual cut

Lineage

  1. 01

    source edition

  2. 02

    pinned citation

  3. 03

    finding

  4. 04

    page

  5. 05

    publication record

Table A.4From the baseline cut to the federation cut
ElementBaseline 20262027 global annual
Sourcescited global publications, pinned by editionnational, regional and sector cuts through one graph
Analysisstated methods and editorial estimatestyped analysis specifications
ModelsSynthetic biology System Model v0 specificationmodel runs with receipts
Findingstwelve baseline findingsfindings re-bound to federation evidence
Reviewfive passes scheduledfive passes on the exact digest

A.4Evidence age and coverage

A 2026 global edition rests on evidence observed in many different years. This page shows each time base, so that no single year label hides older evidence.

Table A.5Evidence age and coverage
IndicatorObservedReleasedCadenceNext release
Recoded genome results2019 to 2025Nature 2019 · Science Oct 2025one-offfollow-up papers
Synthetic yeast2023Cell Dec 2023one-offcompletion papers
Screening study2025Science Oct 2025one-offfollow-up studies
US commission report2025Apr 2025one-offlegislation
US screening framework2024 · 2025 orderApr 2024 · May 2025periodicreplacement text
EU Biotech Act2025Dec 2025periodicsecond act
OECD governance paper2026May 2026one-offnext policy paper
Company results2025 to 2026Feb 2026 · Aug 2026quarterlynext earnings
Table A.6Coverage by system at baseline
SystemCoverageThinnest dimension
Build capabilityGOODindustrial-scale performance
ClinicalPARTIALlong-term outcomes
BiosecurityPARTIALscreening coverage
GovernancePARTIALtext of replacement US framework
InvestmentTHINcommon basis for public and private
Energy and feedstockTHINfermentation footprint
CapacityTHINbiofoundry and plant counts
SkillsTHINworkforce numbers
Table A.7Designed empty states: what is not bound, what would fill it and why
FieldSource that would fill itBlocker
Energy, water and feedstock use of biomanufacturing at scaleproducers, national laboratories, peer-reviewed life-cycle studiesnot retrieved on a common basis; no study opened
DNA synthesis capacity and screening coverage by provider and countryproviders, industry consortia, national agenciesno consolidated series found; screening pages not opened
Status and text of the US screening framework after the 2025 orderOSTP and White House publications2526a fetch of the framework page was refused by the tool; status taken from search summaries and a CRS note summary27
European Commission text of the Biotech Act proposalEuropean Commission proposal COM(2025) 102228primary page not retrieved; content taken from a law firm summary22
Status of the EU second Biotech ActEuropean Commission, European Parliament legislative train29the page returned no content; timing is a Q3 2026 expectation from summaries
Public and private investment in synthetic biology on one basisnational statistics, OECD, industry surveysnot retrieved; only two company filings used1617
Biofoundry and fermentation capacity by countryindustry and trade statisticsnot retrieved
Programme totals for the US distributed bioindustrial manufacturing awards after September 2024US manufacturing programme pages24the page read lists totals to September 2024 only
Bioeconomy size from a primary statistical sourcenational accounts, OECDonly a secondary commentary figure read15
Workforce size and skills gapsnational statistics, OECD, industry surveysnot retrieved; capability rung stays LISTED
Independent replication and viral-resistance tests of recoded strainspeer-reviewed papersnot found at evidence close
Long-term outcomes of engineered therapiestrial follow-up publicationsonly the cited trial and one case report read810
Mirror life risk assessment beyond the policy forumpeer-reviewed risk studiesonly the forum abstract read12
Capability rungs beyond guidance and planningagencies, operators, laboratoriesnot reviewed

A.5Evidence cards, two anchor sources

Published in Science 390 (2025) by Robertson and colleagues; news page of 1 August 2025. One-off. Role: binds BLD-001. Coverage: one organism in one laboratory line.

EVD-XT04-001

Escherichia coli with a 57-codon genetic code1

Published in Science 390 (2025). One-off study. Role: binds SEC-005. Coverage: screening tools and open design software; no sequence detail is reproduced here.

EVD-XT04-002

Strengthening nucleic acid biosecurity screening against generative protein design tools13

Table A.8Quality dimensions at baseline
DimensionEVD-XT04-001EVD-XT04-002
Completenessone organism; about 4 million base pairsa set of screening tools and design software
Timelinessnews page about 12 weeks before the journal datejournal publication in 2025
Revisionpreprint and journal versionspatches reported after testing
Method transparencymethods published in the paperdetails limited for security reasons
External validationpeer reviewpeer review

Evidence cards to follow in 2027

  • Robertson et al.1: viral resistance and replication
  • Science screening study13: follow-up on patches and coverage
  • US framework25: replacement text
  • European Commission28: proposal text

A.6Publication acceptance record

Editorial self-check at evidence close. Every applicable item carries a disposition; the remaining items are review, approval and deposit.

Table A.9Publication acceptance record
GroupAreaItemsPassN/APending
D1Identity and scope8800
D2Source and data12912
D3Analysis and models12381
D4Findings and claims9801
D5Figures, tables, maps10622
D6Editorial and citations10802
D7Review and approval130013
D8Artefact and design12705
D9Registry and release9009

Publication gate

Conditions met
14 of 23 at evidence close
Blocking problems
none recorded
Open conditions
reviews, approval of the exact digest, deposit, registry pointer

Not applicable at baseline

Model runs
first runs in Q1 2027
Maps
plates in Q2 2027
Waivers
none

A.7Status words

Table A.10The status every value carries
StatusWhat it means
ObservedMeasured directly and published by the source.
ReportedPublished statistics of an official or institutional source.
DeclaredStated by the body concerned; not independently measured.
EstimatedA Nexus estimate from cited evidence, with its method in Annex A.
ModelledProduced by a stated model from cited inputs.
InferredReasoned from cited evidence; not measured.
ForecastA projection by the cited source.
SimulatedA simulation result under stated assumptions.
ScenarioA conditional statement under stated assumptions; never a prediction.
Expert inputExpert judgement, recorded with its basis.
CandidateProposed for a later edition; not yet evidence.
Evidence-quality levels (EQL 1 to 5) grade the source behind a value; they are not a score of the subject.

A.8How the edition is made, released and corrected

Every edition is built from a sealed evidence cut, reviewed under three keys, signed and deposited before any site shows it as published; corrections go to Nexus Standards as change proposals and feed the next cut.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Evidence arrives from the pillarsFoundry seals observations and indicator series, Universe hands over after-action and scenario findings, and contributions are screened at every gateway, including this site’s.
02 The cut is sealedOn the cut date the evidence is pinned under one identifier, so anyone can rebuild the edition from exactly what it was built on.
03 The edition is assembledThe edition is drafted from its template and content pack. Agents may draft; they never publish and never decide.
04 The keys turnAt the publisher of record the truth key comes first: every value is checked against its source or stated method before the meaning and capital keys turn. No edition moves on until every key has been turned by a named steward.
05 The gate opensA named approver releases one exact digest of the edition; any change after this point is a new version, never a silent edit.
06 Signed and depositedThe PDF, the web edition and the data bundle are signed together with a manifest and an RO-Crate description, and deposited on Zenodo with a concept and a version DOI.
07 Published on its desk’s siteOnly then does the edition show as published on its desk’s Reports site, and the Collection lists it as a part.
08 Corrections go to StandardsMethod and correction findings go to Nexus Standards as change proposals; citations, corrections and new contributions feed the next evidence cut.

A teaching model of the process, not a forecast and not a record of any run; dates and counts on this page come from the programme record. Sources: Reports governance at GCRI Canada (2026); Zenodo, repository of record for Reports deposits (2026).

Lifecycle, one state at a time: Draft, Computed, Evidence bound, Reviewed, Approved for release, Published, Corrected, Superseded. This edition is a draft.

A.9Glossary and abbreviations

Table A.11Series terms
TermMeaning
Baseline Editionthe inaugural annual edition that fixes the reference state for the series
WEFH+Bwater, energy, food, health and biodiversity, the national nexus core
Couplinga typed dependency through which one system transmits to another
Protection gapthe share of losses not covered by insurance
Capability ladderLISTED → EXISTS → ADEQUATE → TESTED → DEMONSTRATED
EQLevidence-quality level, 1–5
Evidence cuta frozen resolution of exact sources and versions
NNC · NLC · NWGNational Nexus Consortium · National Leadership Council · National Working Groups
Table A.12Abbreviations used in this edition
AbbreviationExpansion
AHTEGAd Hoc Technical Expert Group
BWCBiological Weapons Convention
CBDConvention on Biological Diversity
CRSCongressional Research Service
DBIMPDistributed Bioindustrial Manufacturing Program
EOexecutive order
FDAUS Food and Drug Administration
IGSCInternational Gene Synthesis Consortium
NSCEBNational Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology
OECDOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
OSTPOffice of Science and Technology Policy
SPCsupplementary protection certificate

A.10Technical annex

Table A.13Technical annex
ItemAnnexContentsStatus
A.1Indicator definitionsthe global indicator set, with units and sourcesIN THIS EDITION
A.2Coupling strengthsthe twenty-cell matrix and its rationaleIN THIS EDITION
A.3Scenario specificationSCN-XT04-DSG-01 assumptions and signpostsIN THIS EDITION
A.4Capability placementsrung evidence for fifteen functionsIN THIS EDITION
A.5Model diagnosticsfirst runs and validation2027
A.6Sensitivity analysesinfluence of coupling strengths2027
A.7Cluster notescards for the major platform, DNA supply and manufacturing clusters2027
A.8Review statementspass-by-pass review recordAT RELEASE

A.1 · indicator definition: codons recoded

Construct
number of codon positions in a genome replaced by a synonymous codon
Unit
count of codons
Method
genome design, fragment synthesis and assembly
Source
Nature 569 (2019)3; Science 390 (2025) and the research institute news page2
Uncertainty
the Syn57 count is stated as over 101,000, a lower bound
Known limits
counts may include sense codons and a stop codon; one lineage of organisms

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 25UNVERIFIED, not opened: Office of Science and Technology Policy (ed.), Framework for Nucleic Acid Synthesis Screening, April 2024, taken from search-result summaries; a fetch of the page was refused by the fetch tool. OSTP, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: Executive Order 14292, Improving the Safety and Security of Biological Research, 5 May 2025 (90 days to revise or replace the framework), taken from search-result summaries; a fetch of an explainer page was refused by the fetch tool. The White House, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: Congressional Research Service (ed.), report on artificial intelligence and biosecurity risks (reported in July 2026 as unable to determine whether the 2024 framework or the 2025 policy had been revised), taken from a trade news summary. Library of Congress, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Commission (ed.), Proposal for a Biotech Act, COM(2025) 1022, 16 December 2025, taken from law firm and regulator summaries; the Commission page was not retrieved. European Commission, Brussels. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 22Baker McKenzie (ed.), EU Biotech Act unveiled: Commission proposal to turn Europe into a biotech powerhouse (law firm summary, 19 December 2025; proposal of 16 December 2025; health focus; investment pilot with the European Investment Bank Group; 12-month certificate extension; biodefence measures; second act expected in Q3 2026). Secondary source, not the Commission text. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 29UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Parliament (ed.), Legislative train entry for the European Biotech Act II (second act expected in the third quarter of 2026), taken from a search-result summary; the page returned no content. European Parliament, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 16Twist Bioscience Corporation (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, results for the fiscal third quarter ended 30 June 2026 (company filing; revenue USD 118.4 million; nine months USD 332.8 million; fiscal 2026 guidance USD 456 to 457 million; company statements and guidance are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 17Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, fourth quarter and full year 2025 results (company filing of 26 February 2026; revenue USD 170.155 million against USD 227.043 million; net loss USD 312.763 million; company statements are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 24US Manufacturing Program (ed.), Bioindustrial (programme topic page; Distributed Bioindustrial Manufacturing Program awards announced 10 July to 13 September 2024; 25 awards; USD 42 million cumulative). Manufacturing USA, Gaithersburg. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 15Federation of American Scientists (ed.), Translating Vision into Action: FAS commentary on the NSCEB final report (commentary page; six pillars; cites over USD 210 billion of US GDP and over 640,000 jobs for the bioeconomy; secondary and advocacy-leaning source). Federation of American Scientists, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 8Frangoul, H. et al., Exagamglogene autotemcel for severe sickle cell disease, New England Journal of Medicine 390 (18), 1649 to 1662, 2024 (record read via Europe PMC: 44 treated; 29 of 30 evaluable free of severe crises for 12 months; median follow-up 19.3 months). Massachusetts Medical Society, Waltham. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 10Musunuru, K. et al., Patient-specific in vivo gene editing to treat a rare genetic disease, New England Journal of Medicine 392 (22), 2235 to 2243, 2025 (record read via Europe PMC: one infant; two infusions at about 7 and 8 months). Massachusetts Medical Society, Waltham. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 12Confronting risks of mirror life, Science 386, 1351 to 1353, 2024 (record read via Europe PMC; the record gives only a one-line abstract calling for broad discussion). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 1Robertson, W.E. et al., Escherichia coli with a 57-codon genetic code, Science 390 (6771), eady4368, published 23 October 2025 (record read via PubMed, PMID 40743368; the record gives a 4 megabase synthetic genome and six replaced sense codons). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 13Strengthening nucleic acid biosecurity screening against generative protein design tools, Science 390 (6768), 82 to 87, 2025 (record read via Europe PMC; abstract only; no method detail used). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 3Fredens, J. et al., Total synthesis of Escherichia coli with a recoded genome, Nature 569 (7757), 514 to 518, 2019 (record read via Europe PMC: 18,214 codons recoded; 61-codon genome). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 2MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (ed.), Syn57 represents a new chapter in the genetic code of life (news page, 1 August 2025; over 101,000 codons recoded; 64 to 57 codons; genome of about 4 megabases built from 38 fragments of about 100 kilobases). MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Data appendix

The indicator set with its sources, the source registers, the licences of every kind of material and the formats of the edition.

11 min read0 figures8 tables22 notesNR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

B.1The indicator set

Table B.1Global baseline indicator set
IndicatorValueUnitYearStateSource
Codons in the standard genetic code64codons2025Reported2
Codons in the Syn61 strain61codons2019Reported3
Codons in the Syn57 strain57codons2025Reported2
Codons recoded in Syn6118,214codons2019Reported3
Codons recoded in Syn57>101,000codons2025Reported2
Fragments in the Syn57 assembly38fragments2025Reported2
Synthetic yeast chromosomes in one strain6.5chromosomes2023Reported4
Genome of the first synthetic cell1.08million base pairs2010Reported5
Genetic circuits built by one tool60circuits2016Reported6
Circuits correct in every output state45circuits2016Reported6
Patients treated in the exa-cel phase 3 study44patients2024Reported8
Patients free of severe crises for 12 months29 of 30evaluable patients2024Reported8
US commission recommendations49recommendations2025Reported14
US commission funding recommended, minimum15USD billion over five years2025Scenario14
Twist Bioscience revenue, nine months to 30 June 2026332.8USD million2026Reported16
Twist Bioscience fiscal 2026 revenue guidance456 to 457USD million2026Scenario16
Ginkgo Bioworks revenue170.2USD million2025Reported17
Ginkgo Bioworks net loss312.8USD million2025Reported17
US planning awards for bioindustrial manufacturing, cumulative to September 202425awards2024Reported24
Funding of those awards, cumulative to September 202442USD million2024Reported24
Award for the bioindustrial manufacturing institute87USD million over seven years2020Reported23

B.2Global source register

The governed source set behind this edition. Each source keeps its authority, coverage, cadence and role; categories describe origin, not truth.

Domains bound by the register

  • BLD
  • SEC
  • GOV
  • FIN
  • CLN
  • ENE
  • WAT
  • FOO
  • CLI
  • MIN
Table B.3Global source register
SourceCategoryCoveragePeriodCadenceRole
Robertson et al. in Science1peer-reviewed journalone organism2025one-offgenomes
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology news2research instituteone organism2025one-offgenomes
Cell paper on synthetic yeast4peer-reviewed journalone lineage2023one-offgenomes
Nielsen et al. in Science6peer-reviewed journalmethod2016one-offdesign tools
Journal records for therapies810peer-reviewed journalclinical2024 and 2025one-offclinical
FDA announcement9national regulatorUS2023one-offclinical
Screening study in Science13peer-reviewed journalmethod2025one-offbiosecurity
CRS note on the US commission14legislative research serviceUS2025one-offpolicy
OECD policy papers1819intergovernmental organisationOECD members2025 and 2026periodicgovernance
Company filings1617company filingtwo firms2025 and 2026quarterlyinvestment

B.3Regional reading, synthetic biology across ten clusters

Regional plates follow with the regional editions. This page gives the regional reading of synthetic biology infrastructure and governance in table form and ranks no region.

Table B.4Regional reading, synthetic biology across ten clusters
RegionPrincipal hazardsSystems most exposedBaseline evidence
North Americaresearch laboratories; federal commission report; screening framework in fluxgovernance, manufacturingCRS14; programme page24
South Americaearly national programmes; CBD participationgovernanceregional evidence (not bound)
EuropeBiotech Act proposal; research strengthgovernance, researchEU proposal summary22; OECD18
Eurasiaresearch programmesresearchregional evidence (not bound)
Middle East and North Africaemerging programmesgovernanceregional evidence (not bound)
Africaskills and access; gene drive field programmesworkforce, releaseKyrou11; regional evidence (not bound)
South Asianational mission programmesresearch, skillsregional evidence (not bound)
East Asiamanufacturing and research programmesmanufacturing, researchregional evidence (not bound)
ASEANbioeconomy planninggovernance, manufacturingregional evidence (not bound)
Oceania-Pacificresearch programmes; skillsresearch, workforceregional evidence (not bound)

B.4Cluster card: DNA synthesis and screening chain

  • supply chain
  • DNA synthesis
  • screening
  • oversight
Systems in view
synthesis providers, design tools, sequence data, oversight bodies
Defining events
the 2025 screening study and the 2025 US executive order1326
Couplings
DAT → BIO sequence data; GOV → SEC frameworks
Capability evidence
industry and national guidance exists3132
Gaps
coverage by provider; benchtop devices; compliance
Agenda items
Q-01 · Q-03

Open machine-learning protein design software can produce variants that screening tools often missed [13].

TOOLS

Open design software

The 2024 US framework and the 2025 order left the current text unclear in sources read [26] [27].

RULES

A framework in flux

Patches improved detection in the study, and industry and national guidance exists, but coverage is not counted [13] [31] [32].

RESPONSE

Patches and guidance

B.5How countries appear in the synthetic biology edition

Countries enter the synthetic biology edition through the readiness chapters of their own national editions, on one card grammar. They are read against peer distributions and thresholds, never ranked.

Table B.5How countries appear in the synthetic biology edition
Card fieldWhat it showsSource
WEFH+B stateeach core system against peer distribution bandsnational edition
Couplingsthe national dependency matrixnational edition
Risk objectsthe national risk portfolionational edition
Capability rungsthe national capability laddernational edition
Evidence ageoldest and newest source datesnational source register

Editions in the 2026 Baseline programme

26national

countries and unions

10regional

clusters

16global

flagship and sector

14strategic

systems reports

20frontier

technology reports

How to read a country card

  • Each system is shown against the distribution of its peers, with thresholds where they exist
  • Couplings and risk objects come from the country’s own national edition
  • Capability rungs record evidence, not a judgement of institutions
  • Evidence age is printed, so older national data are visible as such
Table B.6National Baseline Editions in the 2026 programme
WaveCountries and unionsState
W0CanadaISSUED
W1United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, European Union, SwitzerlandPLANNED
W2Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Türkiye, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, Senegal, Kenya, African Union, India, China, Republic of Korea, Indonesia, Singapore, AustraliaPLANNED

B.6Licences

Table B.7Licences of each kind of material
MaterialLicence
TextCC BY 4.0
Dataon the licence of each source; Nexus tables CC BY 4.0
FiguresNexus figures CC BY 4.0; third-party as credited
Mapsboundary source and licence printed on each plate
MetadataCC0 1.0, as Zenodo publishes it
Third-party data, figures and textThe source’s own licence, credited where it is used; never relicensed
Nexus-authored text, tables and figures: CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0). Map plates print their boundary source and licence.

B.7Formats and provenance

Table B.8This edition in every format
FormatKindStateWhat it isIdentifier
Web editionHTMLOn this siteDraft in stewardship review; every value resolves to its source.NR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Print editionPDFAt releaseA4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF, signed with the web edition at release.NR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Indicator dataCSV · JSONOn this site21 indicators with unit, year, status and source; the machine-readable copy ships with the evidence bundle at release.NR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE data release v1
FiguresSVG · PNGOn this site4 on the web edition: headline figure, figure 1.3, coupling instrument, capability ladder.FIG-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-*
SlidesPDFNot recordedNo slide deck is recorded for this edition.
Evidence briefHTML · PDFNot recordedNo evidence brief is recorded for this edition.
Dataset with DOIDataCiteAt releaseConcept and version DOI are minted at deposit; none is recorded yet.

Provenance

Edition pack
The edition’s content pack (JSON), from which the print and web editions are built
Evidence cut
DC-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-B0, closed 30 September 2026
Reproducibility
sourced values cited; analytical values reproducible from stated parameters
Self-check
14 of 23 at evidence close; a fail on any item blocks release
Review
five passes scheduled before release (in Annex C)
Publisher of record
GCRI for the Nexus Consortium
Corrections
Registry correction pathway; upheld corrections are published as notices with a new version

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 2MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (ed.), Syn57 represents a new chapter in the genetic code of life (news page, 1 August 2025; over 101,000 codons recoded; 64 to 57 codons; genome of about 4 megabases built from 38 fragments of about 100 kilobases). MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 3Fredens, J. et al., Total synthesis of Escherichia coli with a recoded genome, Nature 569 (7757), 514 to 518, 2019 (record read via Europe PMC: 18,214 codons recoded; 61-codon genome). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 4Debugging and consolidating multiple synthetic chromosomes reveals combinatorial genetic interactions, Cell 186 (24), 5220 to 5236, 2023 (record read via Europe PMC: 6.5 synthetic chromosomes in one strain; over half of the Sc2.0 genome). Cell Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 5Gibson, D.G. et al., Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesised genome, Science 329 (5987), 52 to 56, 2010 (record read via Europe PMC: 1.08 million base pair genome). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2010. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 6Nielsen, A.A.K. et al., Genetic circuit design automation, Science 352 (6281), 2016 (record read via Europe PMC: 60 circuits; 45 correct in all output states; 92% of output states as predicted). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2016. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 8Frangoul, H. et al., Exagamglogene autotemcel for severe sickle cell disease, New England Journal of Medicine 390 (18), 1649 to 1662, 2024 (record read via Europe PMC: 44 treated; 29 of 30 evaluable free of severe crises for 12 months; median follow-up 19.3 months). Massachusetts Medical Society, Waltham. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 14Congressional Research Service (ed.), National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology: Final Report and Options for Congress, CRS Insight IN12546, 17 April 2025 (report of 8 April 2025; 49 recommendations; at least USD 15 billion over five years; National Biotechnology Coordination Office). Library of Congress, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 16Twist Bioscience Corporation (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, results for the fiscal third quarter ended 30 June 2026 (company filing; revenue USD 118.4 million; nine months USD 332.8 million; fiscal 2026 guidance USD 456 to 457 million; company statements and guidance are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 17Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, fourth quarter and full year 2025 results (company filing of 26 February 2026; revenue USD 170.155 million against USD 227.043 million; net loss USD 312.763 million; company statements are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 24US Manufacturing Program (ed.), Bioindustrial (programme topic page; Distributed Bioindustrial Manufacturing Program awards announced 10 July to 13 September 2024; 25 awards; USD 42 million cumulative). Manufacturing USA, Gaithersburg. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 23BioMADE (ed.), DoD approves USD 87 million for newest bioindustrial manufacturing innovation institute (news page; seven years; the page shows Oct 20 and a 2023 footer, the press release is dated 2020 in search listings). BioMADE, Saint Paul. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 1Robertson, W.E. et al., Escherichia coli with a 57-codon genetic code, Science 390 (6771), eady4368, published 23 October 2025 (record read via PubMed, PMID 40743368; the record gives a 4 megabase synthetic genome and six replaced sense codons). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 10Musunuru, K. et al., Patient-specific in vivo gene editing to treat a rare genetic disease, New England Journal of Medicine 392 (22), 2235 to 2243, 2025 (record read via Europe PMC: one infant; two infusions at about 7 and 8 months). Massachusetts Medical Society, Waltham. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 9US Food and Drug Administration (ed.), FDA approves first gene therapies to treat patients with sickle cell disease (press announcement, 8 December 2023; Casgevy and Lyfgenia; ages 12 and over; 29 of 31 evaluable Casgevy patients free of severe crises for at least 12 months). FDA, Silver Spring. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 13Strengthening nucleic acid biosecurity screening against generative protein design tools, Science 390 (6768), 82 to 87, 2025 (record read via Europe PMC; abstract only; no method detail used). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 18OECD (ed.), Anticipatory governance for responsible innovation in synthetic biology, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 193, 21 May 2026 (record read via a bibliographic database; abstract only). OECD Publishing, Paris. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 19OECD (ed.), Synthetic biology, AI and automation: a forward-looking technology assessment, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 187, 4 December 2025 (record read via a bibliographic database; abstract only). OECD Publishing, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 22Baker McKenzie (ed.), EU Biotech Act unveiled: Commission proposal to turn Europe into a biotech powerhouse (law firm summary, 19 December 2025; proposal of 16 December 2025; health focus; investment pilot with the European Investment Bank Group; 12-month certificate extension; biodefence measures; second act expected in Q3 2026). Secondary source, not the Commission text. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 11Kyrou, K. et al., A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes, Nature Biotechnology 36, 1062 to 1066, 2018 (record read via Europe PMC; laboratory cages only). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: Executive Order 14292, Improving the Safety and Security of Biological Research, 5 May 2025 (90 days to revise or replace the framework), taken from search-result summaries; a fetch of an explainer page was refused by the fetch tool. The White House, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Gene Synthesis Consortium (ed.), Harmonized Screening Protocol, cited from memory. IGSC. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 32UNVERIFIED, not opened: UK Government (ed.), screening guidance on synthetic nucleic acids, 2024, cited from memory. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, London. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

References and record

Every source the edition rests on, the publication record, the corrections log and the open record.

15 min read0 figures1 table0 notesNR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

C.144 sources

NR-CIT-1, editor first. A DOI is linked where the source has one; Nexus records carry a UNI once the catalogue allocates it (NS-1).

  1. 1Robertson, W.E. et al., Escherichia coli with a 57-codon genetic code, Science 390 (6771), eady4368, published 23 October 2025 (record read via PubMed, PMID 40743368; the record gives a 4 megabase synthetic genome and six replaced sense codons). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  2. 2MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (ed.), Syn57 represents a new chapter in the genetic code of life (news page, 1 August 2025; over 101,000 codons recoded; 64 to 57 codons; genome of about 4 megabases built from 38 fragments of about 100 kilobases). MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 8
  3. 3Fredens, J. et al., Total synthesis of Escherichia coli with a recoded genome, Nature 569 (7757), 514 to 518, 2019 (record read via Europe PMC: 18,214 codons recoded; 61-codon genome). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  4. 4Debugging and consolidating multiple synthetic chromosomes reveals combinatorial genetic interactions, Cell 186 (24), 5220 to 5236, 2023 (record read via Europe PMC: 6.5 synthetic chromosomes in one strain; over half of the Sc2.0 genome). Cell Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  5. 5Gibson, D.G. et al., Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesised genome, Science 329 (5987), 52 to 56, 2010 (record read via Europe PMC: 1.08 million base pair genome). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2010. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6
  6. 6Nielsen, A.A.K. et al., Genetic circuit design automation, Science 352 (6281), 2016 (record read via Europe PMC: 60 circuits; 45 correct in all output states; 92% of output states as predicted). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2016. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  7. 7Watson, J.L. et al., De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion, Nature 620, 1089 to 1100, 2023 (record read via Europe PMC). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  8. 8Frangoul, H. et al., Exagamglogene autotemcel for severe sickle cell disease, New England Journal of Medicine 390 (18), 1649 to 1662, 2024 (record read via Europe PMC: 44 treated; 29 of 30 evaluable free of severe crises for 12 months; median follow-up 19.3 months). Massachusetts Medical Society, Waltham. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6
  9. 9US Food and Drug Administration (ed.), FDA approves first gene therapies to treat patients with sickle cell disease (press announcement, 8 December 2023; Casgevy and Lyfgenia; ages 12 and over; 29 of 31 evaluable Casgevy patients free of severe crises for at least 12 months). FDA, Silver Spring. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3
  10. 10Musunuru, K. et al., Patient-specific in vivo gene editing to treat a rare genetic disease, New England Journal of Medicine 392 (22), 2235 to 2243, 2025 (record read via Europe PMC: one infant; two infusions at about 7 and 8 months). Massachusetts Medical Society, Waltham. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6
  11. 11Kyrou, K. et al., A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes, Nature Biotechnology 36, 1062 to 1066, 2018 (record read via Europe PMC; laboratory cages only). Springer Nature, London. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6
  12. 12Confronting risks of mirror life, Science 386, 1351 to 1353, 2024 (record read via Europe PMC; the record gives only a one-line abstract calling for broad discussion). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 4, chapter 6
  13. 13Strengthening nucleic acid biosecurity screening against generative protein design tools, Science 390 (6768), 82 to 87, 2025 (record read via Europe PMC; abstract only; no method detail used). American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 5, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  14. 14Congressional Research Service (ed.), National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology: Final Report and Options for Congress, CRS Insight IN12546, 17 April 2025 (report of 8 April 2025; 49 recommendations; at least USD 15 billion over five years; National Biotechnology Coordination Office). Library of Congress, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  15. 15Federation of American Scientists (ed.), Translating Vision into Action: FAS commentary on the NSCEB final report (commentary page; six pillars; cites over USD 210 billion of US GDP and over 640,000 jobs for the bioeconomy; secondary and advocacy-leaning source). Federation of American Scientists, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  16. 16Twist Bioscience Corporation (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, results for the fiscal third quarter ended 30 June 2026 (company filing; revenue USD 118.4 million; nine months USD 332.8 million; fiscal 2026 guidance USD 456 to 457 million; company statements and guidance are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  17. 17Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (ed.), Form 8-K exhibit 99.1, fourth quarter and full year 2025 results (company filing of 26 February 2026; revenue USD 170.155 million against USD 227.043 million; net loss USD 312.763 million; company statements are weak evidence). US Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  18. 18OECD (ed.), Anticipatory governance for responsible innovation in synthetic biology, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 193, 21 May 2026 (record read via a bibliographic database; abstract only). OECD Publishing, Paris. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  19. 19OECD (ed.), Synthetic biology, AI and automation: a forward-looking technology assessment, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 187, 4 December 2025 (record read via a bibliographic database; abstract only). OECD Publishing, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 4, chapter 6
  20. 20Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (ed.), Synthetic biology (programme page; decisions X/13 to 16/21; AHTEG; horizon scanning; thematic action plan). CBD Secretariat, Montreal. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  21. 21World Health Organization (ed.), Global guidance framework for the responsible use of the life sciences: mitigating biorisks and governing dual-use research (publication page, 13 September 2022). WHO, Geneva. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  22. 22Baker McKenzie (ed.), EU Biotech Act unveiled: Commission proposal to turn Europe into a biotech powerhouse (law firm summary, 19 December 2025; proposal of 16 December 2025; health focus; investment pilot with the European Investment Bank Group; 12-month certificate extension; biodefence measures; second act expected in Q3 2026). Secondary source, not the Commission text. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  23. 23BioMADE (ed.), DoD approves USD 87 million for newest bioindustrial manufacturing innovation institute (news page; seven years; the page shows Oct 20 and a 2023 footer, the press release is dated 2020 in search listings). BioMADE, Saint Paul. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  24. 24US Manufacturing Program (ed.), Bioindustrial (programme topic page; Distributed Bioindustrial Manufacturing Program awards announced 10 July to 13 September 2024; 25 awards; USD 42 million cumulative). Manufacturing USA, Gaithersburg. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  25. 25UNVERIFIED, not opened: Office of Science and Technology Policy (ed.), Framework for Nucleic Acid Synthesis Screening, April 2024, taken from search-result summaries; a fetch of the page was refused by the fetch tool. OSTP, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  26. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: Executive Order 14292, Improving the Safety and Security of Biological Research, 5 May 2025 (90 days to revise or replace the framework), taken from search-result summaries; a fetch of an explainer page was refused by the fetch tool. The White House, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 4, chapter 5, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  27. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: Congressional Research Service (ed.), report on artificial intelligence and biosecurity risks (reported in July 2026 as unable to determine whether the 2024 framework or the 2025 policy had been revised), taken from a trade news summary. Library of Congress, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  28. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Commission (ed.), Proposal for a Biotech Act, COM(2025) 1022, 16 December 2025, taken from law firm and regulator summaries; the Commission page was not retrieved. European Commission, Brussels. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  29. 29UNVERIFIED, not opened: European Parliament (ed.), Legislative train entry for the European Biotech Act II (second act expected in the third quarter of 2026), taken from a search-result summary; the page returned no content. European Parliament, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6
  30. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: Engineering Biology Research Consortium (ed.), response on nucleic acid synthesis screening under Executive Order 14292, November 2025, listed in search results only. EBRC, Emeryville. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2
  31. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Gene Synthesis Consortium (ed.), Harmonized Screening Protocol, cited from memory. IGSC. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  32. 32UNVERIFIED, not opened: UK Government (ed.), screening guidance on synthetic nucleic acids, 2024, cited from memory. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, London. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  33. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (eds.), Biodefense in the Age of Synthetic Biology, 2018, cited from memory; a fetch returned an unrelated page. National Academies Press, Washington. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  34. 34UNVERIFIED, not opened: Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction, 1972, cited from memory. United Nations, Geneva. Observation year 1972. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  35. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2000, cited from memory. CBD Secretariat, Montreal. Observation year 2000. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  36. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Organization for Standardization (ed.), ISO 20688-2, requirements for the production and quality control of synthesised gene fragments, genes and genome-scale constructs, cited from memory. ISO, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6, chapter 8
  37. 37UNVERIFIED, not opened: McKinsey Global Institute (ed.), The Bio Revolution: Innovations transforming economies, societies, and our lives, May 2020, cited from memory; the fetch returned a service error and no figure is used. McKinsey and Company, New York. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6, chapter 8
  38. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: Jinek, M. et al., A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity, Science 337, 816 to 821, 2012, cited from memory. Observation year 2012. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  39. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Gibson, D.G. et al., Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases, Nature Methods 6, 343 to 345, 2009, cited from memory. Observation year 2009. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  40. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: Ro, D.-K. et al., Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast, Nature 440, 940 to 943, 2006, cited from memory. Observation year 2006. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  41. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: Elowitz, M.B. and Leibler, S., A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators, Nature 403, 335 to 338, 2000, cited from memory. Observation year 2000. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  42. 42UNVERIFIED, not opened: Gardner, T.S., Cantor, C.R. and Collins, J.J., Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli, Nature 403, 339 to 342, 2000, cited from memory. Observation year 2000. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  43. 43UNVERIFIED, not opened: Richardson, S.M. et al., Design of a synthetic yeast genome, Science 355, 1040 to 1044, 2017, cited from memory. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  44. 44UNVERIFIED, not opened: bioRxiv preprint of the Syn57 study, Escherichia coli with a 57-codon genetic code, 2025, identified from a search result; the page returned HTTP 429. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2

C.2Publication record

Publication

Title
Exponential Technology Report 2026: Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering, Baseline Edition
Series
Reports · Exponential Technology Series XT-04
Edition
Baseline Edition 2026 · inaugural annual
Version
v1.0.0 · draft for stewardship review
Publication ID
NR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Evidence close
30 September 2026
Publication date
October 2026
DOI
concept and version DOI at deposit

Publisher

Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), for the Nexus Consortium
Place
Toronto
Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor
Stewards
GCRI · technical truth · GRF · public meaning · GRA · capital meaning
Licence
text CC BY 4.0; data on the terms of each source
Copyright
© 2026 GCRI · Nexus Consortium
Language
English (en-GB) source edition
Correspondence
Registry correction pathway · editorial office

Colophon

Format
A4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF
Typefaces
Space Grotesk (display) · Geist (text) · IBM Plex Sans Italic (standfirsts) · IBM Plex Mono (data)
Design standard
Reports Foundational Edition, Volume I, Part VII
Accessibility
tagged PDF and HTML targets; text alternatives for every figure
Production
Reports editorial team, GCRI

Release path for this version

Table C.1Release path for this version
StepWhat happensWhen
Drafteditorial self-check complete at evidence closeOctober 2026
Steward reviewfive passes on the exact draft (keys T · M · F · N)Q4 2026
Approvalpublication authority approves the exact digestbefore release
Depositconcept and version DOI minted; registry pointer setat release
Successionthe 2027 synthetic biology edition reports changes against this baseline2027
Current version
v1.0.0 draft, stewardship review
Previous edition
none, first edition of the series
Next edition
NR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2027-v1.0.0
Latest version
resolve the concept DOI or the registry record
Correction route
Registry correction pathway
Notice types
erratum · addendum · supersession · withdrawal

C.3Corrections log

0correction notices. No edition has been released yet, so none can be corrected; the log below lists each edition’s current version.

EditionVersionDateStateChangeNotice
XT-04NR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0October 2026DraftBaseline Edition 2026, inaugural annual edition,None

Notice types: erratum, addendum, supersession, withdrawal. A correction is a new version with a published notice; the earlier version stays resolvable, and no edition is ever edited in silence.

C.4Open record

This edition’s open record

Publication ID
NR-XTECH-SYNBIO-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Desk identifier and series alias
NR-XTC-XT-04-2026-BL
Collection
None
DOI
Concept and version DOI at deposit, on Zenodo with DataCite metadata
Versions
Each correction is a new version (isNewVersionOf); the concept DOI resolves to the latest
Bundle
RO-Crate 1.2 with CITATION.cff, CodeMeta and PROV-O provenance; a signed manifest
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0) for original material; metadata CC0 1.0

Credit and identity

ORCID
Your iD in the deposit and the contribution record; DataCite can then add the work to your ORCID record
ROR
Your organisation by its ROR identifier, never by a typed name alone
CRediT
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualisation, Writing, review and editing
Account
None needed to contribute; never a password

Find and follow

Search the open indexes for Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering; software is cited by its SWHID from Software Heritage, and a quantified scenario run is preregistered on OSF before it is run. Annotation is your choice: Hypothesis opens this page in its own viewer.

Mirrors and harvest

The DOI is canonical. At release each signed bundle is also given an IPFS content identifier and a bloxberg anchor as mirrors; both are listed in the record once they exist. Zenodo exposes every record over OAI-PMH, and reviews and endorsements can arrive through COAR Notify where the repository supports it.

InvenioRDM metadata for a contribution on Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering, prefilled from this page
{
  "metadata": {
    "resource_type": {
      "id": "dataset"
    },
    "title": "Evidence on Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering for Nexus Reports",
    "publication_date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
    "creators": [
      {
        "person_or_org": {
          "type": "personal",
          "family_name": "Your family name",
          "given_name": "Your given name",
          "identifiers": [
            {
              "scheme": "orcid",
              "identifier": "0000-0000-0000-0000"
            }
          ]
        },
        "affiliations": [
          {
            "id": "ROR identifier of your organisation"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "description": "What it is, where its record is kept and how it bears on Exponential Technology Report 2026: Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering.",
    "rights": [
      {
        "id": "cc-by-4.0"
      }
    ],
    "subjects": [
      {
        "subject": "Nexus Reports"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Exponential Technology Report · XT-04"
      }
    ],
    "related_identifiers": [
      {
        "identifier": "https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/editions/xt-04/",
        "scheme": "url",
        "relation_type": {
          "id": "issupplementto"
        },
        "resource_type": {
          "id": "publication-report"
        }
      }
    ],
    "version": "1.0.0"
  },
  "custom_fields": {},
  "access": {
    "record": "public",
    "files": "public"
  },
  "files": {
    "enabled": true
  },
  "parent": {
    "communities": {
      "default": "nexusreports"
    }
  }
}

C.5Where this edition sits among the six pillars

Foundry seals the evidence and Universe tests it; Reports publishes it; Standards takes its corrections and Academy teaches from it.

  1. F03 Sealed observations and indicator series Foundry Sealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
  2. F04 After-action and scenario findings for Universe After-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
  3. F05 National Portfolio movement for chapter Foundry National Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
  4. Applied in editions Standards Nexus Standards: applied in editions.
  5. XT-04 edition Reports Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering 2026, published in every format with its sources, citation and corrections.
  6. F06 Method and correction findings as change Standards Method and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
  7. F12 Q4 synthesis informs the next-year Universe Q4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
  8. Taught in the open Academy Risk Academy: taught in the open.

What Foundry and Universe hand to this edition, and what it hands to Standards, Universe and Academy. From the programme spine; XT-04 is a drafted Baseline Edition, so these handoffs run from its first operational quarter.

HandoffBetweenWhat crosses, and when
F03Foundry to ReportsSealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
F04Universe to ReportsAfter-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
F05Foundry to ReportsNational Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
RingNexus Standards to ReportsNexus Standards: applied in editions.
F06Reports to Nexus StandardsMethod and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
F12Reports to UniverseQ4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
RingReports to Risk AcademyRisk Academy: taught in the open.
ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Synthetic Biology and Bioengineering.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the GCRI Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskExponential Technology

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.