Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

  • Reports
  • Baseline Edition 2026
  • Complete edition

Exponential Technology Report 2026: Advanced Energy Storage

Edition home

Choose A4 or Letter in the print dialog; running heads and page numbers are added in print. This is a review copy: the signed PDF with its DOI is issued at release.

ReportsXT-16

Exponential Technology

Advanced Energy Storage 2026

Baseline Edition 2026NR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINEGCRI for the Nexus Consortium

Imprint

Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor, the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI)
Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) for the Nexus Consortium, Toronto
Report number
NR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE
Evidence close
30 September 2026, cut DC-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Status
Draft under stewardship review; not yet released
DOI and UNI
Issued at deposit
Licence
CC BY 4.0 for Nexus-authored text, tables and figures; third-party material keeps its own licence
Cite as
Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Exponential Technology Report 2026: Advanced Energy Storage (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI). https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/editions/xt-16/

Contents

  1. ·

    Executive summary

  2. 1

    Chapter 1. Storage is grid infrastructure and a supply chain

  3. 2

    Chapter 2. Key findings

  4. 3

    Chapter 3. Systems and sectors at baseline

  5. 4

    Chapter 4. Risks and capability

  6. 5

    Chapter 5. Grid dependence on batteries while supply is restricted

  7. 6

    Chapter 6. Readings from the other desks

  8. 7

    Chapter 7. The 2027 agenda

  9. 8

    Chapter 8. Systems in depth

  10. A

    Annex A. Methodology

  11. B

    Annex B. Data appendix

  12. C

    Annex C. References and record

Executive summary

The edition on a few pages: the abstract, the key messages, the headline finding and what each steward reads in it.

5 min read1 figure0 tables8 notesNR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

S.1Abstract

Advanced energy storage matters to the Nexus programme in two ways. It is a new grid infrastructure that moves solar and wind output into the evening and gives power systems flexibility. It is also a materials supply chain built on lithium, graphite, cobalt and a small number of cell makers. The deployment evidence is strong. The IEA counts 108 GW of new battery storage worldwide in 2025, 40% more than in 2024, and about 80% of it was utility-scale1. IRENA reports that the installed cost of a four-hour utility-scale battery fell about 30% in 2025 to USD 140 per kWh, around 95% below 20102. Lithium iron phosphate cells make up about 90% of deployments1. In the United States, utility-scale battery capacity was 43.6 GW at the end of 2025 and nearly 52 GW by mid-20263. The supply base is concentrated. The Democratic Republic of the Congo mined an estimated 73% of cobalt, China produced about 82% of natural graphite, and the IEA reports record refining concentration across energy minerals678. China announced export controls on battery supply chains on 9 October 2025, and the IEA records that proposed controls on batteries were suspended until November 20268. The European Union battery regulation requires a battery passport from 18 February 2027 for industrial batteries above 2 kWh10. Evidence on long-duration storage volumes, fire incident rates, recycling capacity and workforce is thin. This baseline sets out what the evidence supports and where it is thin. It forecasts no price or deployment figure and ranks no country, vendor or chemistry.

S.2Key messages

Six readings that frame the energy storage baseline, and the eight questions this edition answers, each with its status and source.

  1. 108 GW was added worldwide in 2025, 40% more than in 2024.1

    How fast is storage growing?Reported

  2. About USD 140 per kWh installed for four-hour utility-scale systems in 2025.2

    What does it cost?Reported

  3. Lithium iron phosphate, about 90% to 94% of deployments depending on the source.12

    Which chemistry dominates?Reported

  4. Cobalt in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, natural graphite in China, and refining across energy minerals.678

    Where is the supply concentrated?Reported

  5. A battery passport from 18 February 2027 and safety documentation for stationary systems.10

    What does Europe require?Reported

  6. Pumped storage USD 153 per kWh installed; other options cost more in 2025.2

    What do long-duration options cost?Reported

  7. Incident rates on a common basis are not bound; one 2025 fire is recorded in a secondary source.14

    How safe is it?Reported

  8. A grid that depends on batteries while supply stays concentrated. SCN-XT16-SUP-01

    What will 2027 test first?Expert input

S.3Headline finding

ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-FIN-002

IRENA reports that the installed cost of four-hour utility-scale battery storage fell about 30% in 2025 to USD 140 per kWh, around 95% below the 2010 level.

Figure S.1Installed cost of four-hour utility-scale battery storage (USD per kWh)
ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
20102,634
2025140

Source: IRENA Renewable Power Generation Costs in 20252. The 2010 value is attributed there to BNEF.

Cheaper storage makes it a routine part of new solar projects: about a quarter of utility-scale solar commissioned in 2025 was paired with a battery2. IRENA also notes that the rebound in battery metal prices in early 2026 is a reminder that input cost volatility can slow the trend2. The IEA records that lithium prices almost doubled between January 2025 and April 20268.

S.4At a glance

108GW

added worldwide, 20251

140USD per kWh

installed cost, 20252

≈90%

lithium iron phosphate share1

≈52GW

US utility-scale capacity, mid-20263

73%

cobalt mined in the Democratic Republic of the Congo6

2027date

EU battery passport, 18 February10

S.5What each steward reads in it

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports reading energy storage as grid infrastructure and as a materials supply chain.

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people storage arrives as a headline about a battery plant, a fire or a cheaper bill.

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. Costs fell about 30% in one year while input prices rebounded, and investment totals are not bound.

NEXUS

Synthesis

Storage is well described by deployment and cost series and thinly measured as a system.

S.6What this edition is, and is not

What this edition is

A baseline: the 2026 state of advanced energy storage as infrastructure and the couplings through which it carries risk into other systems. It synthesises published evidence and ranks no country, company or asset.

What it is not

Not a forecast of deployment or prices, a technology ranking, an endorsement of any vendor or chemistry, or an assessment of any project or programme. Safety codes, trade measures and subsidies are decisions of competent authorities.

What comes next

National, regional and sector evidence feeds the 2027 energy storage edition through the federation. Each edition reports what changed against this baseline: observations, source revisions, method changes, scenario updates and corrections.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1IEA (ed.), Global Energy Review 2026, section Technology: Battery storage (108 GW of new battery storage deployed in 2025, 40% more than in 2024; about 80% utility-scale; lithium iron phosphate about 90% of deployments; China about 60% of additions; battery-based UPS additions up 30% to 45 GW). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 2IRENA (ed.), Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2025, 2026 (installed cost of four-hour utility-scale battery storage about USD 140 per kWh, down close to 30%; total installed cost by storage technology; solar paired with batteries). International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 3US Energy Information Administration (ed.), Battery storage capacity averaged 70% growth over the last three years, Today in Energy, 7 August 2026 (43.6 GW at the end of 2025; nearly 52 GW at mid-2026; planned additions to 2028). EIA, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 6USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Cobalt (Democratic Republic of the Congo share, export quotas 2026 and 2027, import reliance). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 7USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Graphite (Natural) (China share of production, anode material imports, preliminary duties). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 8IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (revised version, July 2026; concentration of refining, lithium price rise from January 2025 to April 2026, China export controls of 9 October 2025, LFP share of battery energy storage). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 10European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries (full text; battery passport from 18 February 2027; safety of stationary battery energy storage systems, Article 12; recycled content targets). Official Journal of the European Union, Luxembourg. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 14Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Moss Landing Power Plant (fire of 16 January 2025; 300 MW and 1,200 MWh phase; about 1,200 residents evacuated). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Storage is grid infrastructure and a supply chain

Part I describes systems and their couplings. It ranks no country or operator and assesses no authority.

5 min read2 figures1 table7 notesNR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

1.1The questions this part answers

Key questions

  • Where is energy storage risk concentrated?
  • Which couplings carry energy storage shocks into other systems?
  • Which energy storage capabilities hold under compound stress?
  • What must 2027 evidence measure first?

In this part

  • Narrative
  • Headline finding
  • Lead figure
  • Five footprint and governance chapters
  • Twelve-domain reading
  • Sector screens
  • Dependency matrix
  • Risk objects
  • Capability ladder
  • Scenario
  • Three lenses
  • Portfolio

1.2The argument

Energy storage is usually discussed as a cost curve. The 2026 evidence reads it as two things at once: a grid infrastructure that shifts solar and wind output across the day, and a materials supply chain that depends on a few minerals, a few countries and one dominant chemistry128.

The deployment evidence is strong. The IEA counts 108 GW of new battery storage in 2025, 40% more than in 2024, and installed capacity is eleven times the 2021 level1. Costs fell about 30% in one year to USD 140 per kWh installed2.

The supply evidence is concentrated. Lithium iron phosphate is in about 90% of deployments1. The Democratic Republic of the Congo mined an estimated 73% of cobalt and China produced about 82% of natural graphite67. China announced export controls on battery supply chains in October 20258.

The least measured parts are safety rates, long-duration volumes, recycling and workforce. One 2025 fire is recorded in a secondary source, and incident rates on a common basis are not bound14.

Figure 1.1What do storage options cost installed? Total installed cost, USD per kWh

Pumped storage and four-hour batteries have similar installed costs per kWh in 2025. Other long-duration options cost more per kWh and are shown as reported averages across few projects2.

ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
Four-hour utility-scale battery140
Pumped storage hydropower153
Thermal storage245
Compressed air381
Gravity storage803

Source: as cited in the note to this figure. Year 2025.

Figure ID FIG-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-01-003

140USD per kWh

four-hour battery, 20252

153USD per kWh

pumped storage, 20252

245USD per kWh

thermal storage, 20252

803USD per kWh

gravity storage, 20252

1.3Twenty couplings between five systems

The energy storage-centred matrix types the twenty couplings between the five core systems, read for their energy storage content. Strengths are Nexus estimates (ESTIMATED) from the cited evidence and analogue events; they set the graph that 2027 evidence will test.

Figure 1.2Couplings between the five systems

Each line is one coupling from one system to another, drawn by the strength the edition assigns. Strengths are Nexus estimates from the cited evidence and analogue events.

  • Strong
  • Moderate
  • Weak

Source: this edition’s coupling matrix (Table 1.1); status Estimated.

Table 1.1Coupling matrix: from the row system to the column system
From, toWATENEFOOHLTBIO
WAT Water·WEAK
pumped storage water
WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
ENE EnergyWEAK
cooling and siting, not bound
·WEAK
cold-chain backup, undocumented
WEAK
clinic backup, undocumented
WEAK
no documented link
FOO FoodWEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
·WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
HLT HealthWEAK
no documented link
WEAK
workforce
WEAK
no documented link
·WEAK
no documented link
BIO BiodiversityWEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
·
Strength: strong, moderate or weak; a Nexus estimate (status Estimated) from cited evidence and analogue events. The scale is defined in Annex A.

Transmission paths

  1. 01

    TRD → MIN → ENE

    Export controls or price swings on battery materials slow storage build-out.

    Reported China controls of October 20258

  2. 02

    MIN → FIN → ENE

    Lithium and graphite prices change installed cost.

    Reported lithium prices almost doubled, 2025 to 20268

  3. 03

    FIN → ENE

    Falling cost raises deployment and solar pairing.

    Reported cost fall of about 30% in 20252

  4. 04

    INF → ENE

    A fire or siting dispute can halt a project or a market.

    Inferred Moss Landing record14

  5. 05

    GOV → DAT

    The battery passport sets data duties from 2027.

    Reported EU regulation10

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1IEA (ed.), Global Energy Review 2026, section Technology: Battery storage (108 GW of new battery storage deployed in 2025, 40% more than in 2024; about 80% utility-scale; lithium iron phosphate about 90% of deployments; China about 60% of additions; battery-based UPS additions up 30% to 45 GW). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 2IRENA (ed.), Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2025, 2026 (installed cost of four-hour utility-scale battery storage about USD 140 per kWh, down close to 30%; total installed cost by storage technology; solar paired with batteries). International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 8IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (revised version, July 2026; concentration of refining, lithium price rise from January 2025 to April 2026, China export controls of 9 October 2025, LFP share of battery energy storage). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 6USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Cobalt (Democratic Republic of the Congo share, export quotas 2026 and 2027, import reliance). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 7USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Graphite (Natural) (China share of production, anode material imports, preliminary duties). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 14Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Moss Landing Power Plant (fire of 16 January 2025; 300 MW and 1,200 MWh phase; about 1,200 residents evacuated). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 10European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries (full text; battery passport from 18 February 2027; safety of stationary battery energy storage systems, Article 12; recycled content targets). Official Journal of the European Union, Luxembourg. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Key findings

Twelve findings carry the energy storage baseline. They are grouped by coupling and never ranked. Each resolves to its source or, where Nexus analysis is involved, to its stated method.

5 min read1 figure0 tables13 notesNR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

2.1Headline finding

ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-FIN-002

IRENA reports that the installed cost of four-hour utility-scale battery storage fell about 30% in 2025 to USD 140 per kWh, around 95% below the 2010 level.

Figure 2.1Installed cost of four-hour utility-scale battery storage (USD per kWh)
ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
20102,634
2025140

Source: IRENA Renewable Power Generation Costs in 20252. The 2010 value is attributed there to BNEF.

Implication

Cheaper storage makes it a routine part of new solar projects: about a quarter of utility-scale solar commissioned in 2025 was paired with a battery2. IRENA also notes that the rebound in battery metal prices in early 2026 is a reminder that input cost volatility can slow the trend2. The IEA records that lithium prices almost doubled between January 2025 and April 20268.

What would move it

Installed cost in the next IRENA report, lithium and graphite prices, and trade measures would each move this finding.

2.2Infrastructure

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-001

    The IEA counts 108 GW of new battery storage capacity deployed worldwide in 2025, 40% more than in 2024; installed capacity is eleven times the 2021 level, and lithium iron phosphate is in about 90% of deployments.12

  2. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-004

    US utility-scale battery capacity was 43.6 GW at the end of 2025 and nearly 52 GW by mid-2026; operators plan 14 GW more in the second half of 2026, 26 GW in 2027 and 14 GW in 2028.3

2.3Finance

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-FIN-002

    IRENA reports that the installed cost of four-hour utility-scale battery storage fell about 30% in 2025 to USD 140 per kWh, around 95% below the 2010 level of USD 2,634 per kWh.2

  2. ReportedEQL 3NRF-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-FIN-003

    Ember reports that battery costs fell 45% in 2025 after a fall of 20% in 2024, while deployment grew 46% to an estimated 250 GWh; this is a different measure from installed system cost.42

2.4Minerals

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-MIN-005

    World lithium mine production rose 31% to about 290,000 tons in 2025, excluding the United States, and batteries account for 88% of lithium end use.5

  2. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-MIN-006

    The Democratic Republic of the Congo accounted for an estimated 73% of mined cobalt in 2025 and set export quotas of up to 96,600 tons a year for 2026 and 2027.624

  3. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-MIN-007

    China produced an estimated 82% of natural graphite in 2025, and the IEA reports that the average share of the top refined supplier across energy minerals reached about 72%.78

2.5Governance

  1. ReportedEQL 5NRF-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-GOV-008

    Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 requires a battery passport from 18 February 2027 for industrial batteries above 2 kWh, sets safety requirements for stationary storage systems, and sets recycled content targets for cobalt, lead, lithium and nickel to be met by 2031.1011

  2. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-GOV-009

    China announced export controls on lithium-ion battery supply chains on 9 October 2025; the IEA records that proposed controls on batteries were suspended until November 2026.8

2.6Energy

  1. ReportedEQL 3NRF-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-ENE-010

    IRENA reports total installed cost of USD 153 per kWh for pumped storage, USD 245 for thermal storage, USD 381 for compressed air and USD 803 for gravity storage; one vendor states that its iron-air system can discharge for up to 100 hours.213

2.7Safety

  1. ReportedEQL 2NRF-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-SAF-011

    A fire at a 300 MW, 1,200 MWh battery plant at Moss Landing, California, began on 16 January 2025 and about 1,200 residents were evacuated, according to a secondary summary.14

2.8Systemic

  1. Expert inputEQL 2NRF-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-SYS-012

    The leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is a grid that depends on batteries while cell, cathode and graphite supply stays concentrated and trade measures change. § scenario

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 2IRENA (ed.), Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2025, 2026 (installed cost of four-hour utility-scale battery storage about USD 140 per kWh, down close to 30%; total installed cost by storage technology; solar paired with batteries). International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 8IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (revised version, July 2026; concentration of refining, lithium price rise from January 2025 to April 2026, China export controls of 9 October 2025, LFP share of battery energy storage). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 1IEA (ed.), Global Energy Review 2026, section Technology: Battery storage (108 GW of new battery storage deployed in 2025, 40% more than in 2024; about 80% utility-scale; lithium iron phosphate about 90% of deployments; China about 60% of additions; battery-based UPS additions up 30% to 45 GW). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 3US Energy Information Administration (ed.), Battery storage capacity averaged 70% growth over the last three years, Today in Energy, 7 August 2026 (43.6 GW at the end of 2025; nearly 52 GW at mid-2026; planned additions to 2028). EIA, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 4Ember (ed.), Global Electricity Review 2026, 21 April 2026 (battery costs down 45% in 2025 after 20% in 2024; deployment up 46% to an estimated 250 GWh; 14% of new solar generation shifted). Ember, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 5USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Lithium (world mine production 2025, end uses, prices, reserves). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 6USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Cobalt (Democratic Republic of the Congo share, export quotas 2026 and 2027, import reliance). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 24Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Cobalt (Democratic Republic of the Congo production share quoted at different values from cited sources). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 7USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Graphite (Natural) (China share of production, anode material imports, preliminary duties). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 10European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries (full text; battery passport from 18 February 2027; safety of stationary battery energy storage systems, Article 12; recycled content targets). Official Journal of the European Union, Luxembourg. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 11European Commission (ed.), Batteries (policy page; Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 in force 17 August 2023, applies from 18 February 2024; Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/606 of 4 July 2025 on recycling efficiency). Directorate-General for Environment, Brussels. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 13Form Energy (ed.), Battery technology page (iron-air system described as able to discharge for up to 100 hours). Vendor statement, weak evidence, not independently tested. Form Energy, Somerville. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 14Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Moss Landing Power Plant (fire of 16 January 2025; 300 MW and 1,200 MWh phase; about 1,200 residents evacuated). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Systems and sectors at baseline

5 min read0 figures2 tables11 notesNR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

3.1Where each system stood at evidence close

INF · Deployment

Battery storage added worldwide

108GW

40% more than in 2024; about 80% utility-scale.

Reported2025IEA1

FIN · Cost

Installed cost, four-hour utility-scale battery

140USD per kWh

about 30% lower than in 2024.

Reported2025IRENA2

INF · Chemistry

Lithium iron phosphate share of deployments

≈90%

IRENA gives about 94% of new installations.

Reported2025IEA1

MIN · Supply

World lithium mine production

290thousand tons

31% more than in 2024, excluding the United States.

Reported2025USGS5

MIN · Supply

Share of mined cobalt from the Democratic Republic of the Congo

73%

export quotas set for 2026 and 2027.

Reported2025USGS6

INF · National

US utility-scale battery capacity, mid-2026

≈52GW

43.6 GW at the end of 2025.

Reported2026EIA3

3.2Domain posture

Each of the twelve coupled domains is read through energy storage, in words, not scored. The coupling column names the dependency that carries energy storage risk into each domain.

Table 3.1Each domain read in words, not scored
DomainPosture at baselineCouplingStatus
WATWater use of pumped storage and thermal systems is not bound in this edition.WAT ↔ ENEExpert input EQL 1
ENEThe core system: 108 GW added in 2025; solar and storage pairing is now routine.the core systemReported EQL 5
FOONo documented coupling at baseline; cold-chain backup is not evidenced here.none documentedExpert input EQL 1
HLTNo documented coupling at baseline; backup power for clinics is not evidenced here.none documentedExpert input EQL 1
BIONo documented coupling at baseline.none documentedExpert input EQL 1
CLIStorage lets solar output reach evening hours; installed batteries shifted about 14% of new solar generation in 2025.ENE → CLIReported EQL 3
INFGrid infrastructure: 80% of 2025 additions were utility-scale; one 2025 fire is recorded.ENE ↔ INFReported EQL 4
FINInstalled cost fell about 30% in 2025; investment totals are not bound.FIN ↔ ENEReported EQL 4
DATThe EU battery passport brings a data record for each industrial battery above 2 kWh from 2027.ENE → DATReported EQL 3
AICBattery-based backup power for data centres rose 30% to 45 GW in 2025; the share tied to compute load is not bound.AIC → ENEReported EQL 3
MINLithium, cobalt and graphite supply is concentrated; lithium prices almost doubled from January 2025 to April 2026.MIN → ENEReported EQL 4
TRDExport controls on battery supply chains were announced in October 2025; some were suspended until November 2026.TRD → MINReported EQL 4

3.3Sector screens

All sixteen sectors are screened for their dependence on energy storage, on the same grammar as every national edition. The evidence column describes coverage of the baseline evidence, not the performance of the sector.

Table 3.2Sectors: baseline evidence and the exposure to watch
CodeSectorBaseline evidenceExposure to watchEvidence coverage
GS-00Cross-systemstorage couples to power, minerals and tradesupply shock during rapid grid dependenceTHIN
GS-01Waterwater use of storage not boundpumped storage sitingTHIN
GS-02Energy108 GW added in 20251evening peak relianceGOOD
GS-03Foodno documented couplingnone documentedTHIN
GS-04Healthno documented couplingnone documentedTHIN
GS-05Financeinstalled cost USD 140 per kWh2investment totals not boundPARTIAL
GS-06Developmentaccess to storage in lower-income markets not boundwidening gapsTHIN
GS-07Climatesolar shifting 14% of new generation4avoided curtailmentPARTIAL
GS-08Disasterbackup power evidence not boundnone documentedTHIN
GS-09Infrastructureutility-scale share about 80%1fire and sitingPARTIAL
GS-10Citiesno documented couplingnone documentedTHIN
GS-11Biodiversityno documented couplingnone documentedTHIN
GS-12Earth observationno documented couplingnone documentedTHIN
GS-13Cyber and digitalbattery passport data from 202710data governancePARTIAL
GS-14PolicyEU regulation and trade measures810export controls and subsidiesGOOD
GS-15Sciencepeer-reviewed base on cost and technology383940common cost basisGOOD

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1IEA (ed.), Global Energy Review 2026, section Technology: Battery storage (108 GW of new battery storage deployed in 2025, 40% more than in 2024; about 80% utility-scale; lithium iron phosphate about 90% of deployments; China about 60% of additions; battery-based UPS additions up 30% to 45 GW). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 2IRENA (ed.), Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2025, 2026 (installed cost of four-hour utility-scale battery storage about USD 140 per kWh, down close to 30%; total installed cost by storage technology; solar paired with batteries). International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 5USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Lithium (world mine production 2025, end uses, prices, reserves). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 6USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Cobalt (Democratic Republic of the Congo share, export quotas 2026 and 2027, import reliance). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 3US Energy Information Administration (ed.), Battery storage capacity averaged 70% growth over the last three years, Today in Energy, 7 August 2026 (43.6 GW at the end of 2025; nearly 52 GW at mid-2026; planned additions to 2028). EIA, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 4Ember (ed.), Global Electricity Review 2026, 21 April 2026 (battery costs down 45% in 2025 after 20% in 2024; deployment up 46% to an estimated 250 GWh; 14% of new solar generation shifted). Ember, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 10European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries (full text; battery passport from 18 February 2027; safety of stationary battery energy storage systems, Article 12; recycled content targets). Official Journal of the European Union, Luxembourg. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 8IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (revised version, July 2026; concentration of refining, lithium price rise from January 2025 to April 2026, China export controls of 9 October 2025, LFP share of battery energy storage). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: Dunn, B., Kamath, H. and Tarascon, J.-M., Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices, Science 334, 928 to 935, 2011, cited from memory. Observation year 2011. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Schmidt, O. et al., Projecting the future levelized cost of electricity storage technologies, Joule 3, 81 to 100, 2019, cited from memory. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: Albertus, P., Manser, J.S. and Litzelman, S., Long-duration electricity storage applications, economics, and technologies, Joule 4, 21 to 32, 2020, cited from memory. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Risks and capability

Four energy storage risk objects open the portfolio. Order carries no rank. Each is read across driver, exposure, vulnerability, capacity, cascade and consequence.

6 min read0 figures1 table22 notesNR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

4.1Risk objects

Each risk is read across the chain from hazard to consequence, with its status and evidence-quality level.

  1. InferredEQL 4RSK-XT16-MIN-001

    Concentrated cell and materials supply

    Driver
    concentrated mining and refining; export controls678
    Exposure
    grid projects and manufacturers that rely on one cell chemistry
    Vulnerability
    few suppliers of cathode, anode and equipment
    Capacity
    diversification projects; recycling targets810
    Cascade
    MIN → ENE → INF
    Horizon
    1 to 5 years
  2. InferredEQL 3RSK-XT16-SAF-002

    Fire and thermal events at large sites

    Driver
    rapid growth in utility-scale capacity1
    Exposure
    neighbouring residents and local grids
    Vulnerability
    older chemistries and dense sites; incident rates not bound1425
    Capacity
    safety codes and large-scale fire testing303132
    Cascade
    INF → ENE
    Horizon
    1 to 5 years
  3. Expert inputEQL 2RSK-XT16-FIN-003

    Cost rebound from input prices

    Driver
    lithium price rise since early 20258
    Exposure
    project economics and procurement schedules
    Vulnerability
    fixed-price contracts and thin margins
    Capacity
    chemistry diversification; sodium-ion options1847
    Cascade
    FIN → ENE
    Horizon
    1 to 5 years
  4. InferredEQL 3RSK-XT16-GOV-004

    Fragmented trade and safety rules

    Driver
    tariffs, export controls and divergent codes7810
    Exposure
    developers and manufacturers selling in several markets
    Vulnerability
    uneven compliance capacity and testing capacity
    Capacity
    regulation and standards bodies103336
    Cascade
    GOV → MIN, FIN
    Horizon
    1 to 5 years

4.2Capability ladder

Existence is not readiness. Each of the fifteen capability functions is placed on the ladder by the strongest public evidence for energy storage at the global level.

Table 4.1Capabilities on the ladder of evidence: listed, exists, demonstrated, tested
FunctionRungLevelStrongest public evidence at baseline
Prevention and mitigationEXISTSsafety standards and EU safety documentation for stationary systems103032
Monitoring and observationLISTEDno common tracker of incidents or field degradation25
Early warningLISTEDsupply and price watching is not consolidated
Preparedness and planningEXISTSEU regulation and national procurement programmes310
Redundancy and reservesLISTEDstrategic stocks of battery materials are not documented here
ResponseLISTEDno tested response to a large site fire documented here14
Continuity of critical servicesLISTEDstorage as backup for critical services is not evidenced here
RecoveryLISTEDone plant clean-up and recycling record in a secondary source14
AdaptationEXISTSchemistry diversification is under way1819
Social protectionLISTEDnot applicable at baseline
Finance and insuranceLISTEDinvestment and insurance data are not bound
Institutional coordinationEXISTSstandards bodies and regulators102648
Technical infrastructureEXISTSlarge and growing installed base13
WorkforceLISTEDskills gaps reported; no figure bound
Research capacityADEQUATEstrong peer-reviewed base38394041
A capability listed in policy is not a tested one; each rung is the strongest public evidence at baseline.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 6USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Cobalt (Democratic Republic of the Congo share, export quotas 2026 and 2027, import reliance). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 7USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Graphite (Natural) (China share of production, anode material imports, preliminary duties). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 8IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (revised version, July 2026; concentration of refining, lithium price rise from January 2025 to April 2026, China export controls of 9 October 2025, LFP share of battery energy storage). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 10European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries (full text; battery passport from 18 February 2027; safety of stationary battery energy storage systems, Article 12; recycled content targets). Official Journal of the European Union, Luxembourg. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 1IEA (ed.), Global Energy Review 2026, section Technology: Battery storage (108 GW of new battery storage deployed in 2025, 40% more than in 2024; about 80% utility-scale; lithium iron phosphate about 90% of deployments; China about 60% of additions; battery-based UPS additions up 30% to 45 GW). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 14Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Moss Landing Power Plant (fire of 16 January 2025; 300 MW and 1,200 MWh phase; about 1,200 residents evacuated). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 25UNVERIFIED, not opened: EPRI (ed.), Battery Energy Storage System Failure Incident Database (the page returned no data; incident rate figures seen only in a secondary summary). Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: UL Standards and Engagement (ed.), UL 9540, Energy Storage Systems and Equipment, third edition 2023, cited from memory; the catalogue page showed no document text. UL, Northbrook. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: UL Standards and Engagement (ed.), UL 9540A, Test Method for Evaluating Thermal Runaway Fire Propagation in Battery Energy Storage Systems, cited from memory. UL, Northbrook. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 32UNVERIFIED, not opened: National Fire Protection Association (ed.), NFPA 855, Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems, 2023 edition, cited from memory; the page showed only the title. NFPA, Quincy. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 18Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Sodium-ion battery (energy density figures; producer announcements of 2025; cost claims marked as needing update). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 47UNVERIFIED, not opened: CATL (ed.), announcement of the Naxtra sodium-ion battery brand, April 2025, known only from a secondary summary; the company news page was fetched but no article was read. Contemporary Amperex Technology, Ningde. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Electrotechnical Commission (ed.), IEC 62619:2022, Safety requirements for secondary lithium cells and batteries for use in industrial applications, cited from memory. IEC, Geneva. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Electrotechnical Commission (ed.), IEC 62933-5-2, Electrical energy storage systems, safety requirements for grid-integrated systems, electrochemical-based systems, cited from memory. IEC, Geneva. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 3US Energy Information Administration (ed.), Battery storage capacity averaged 70% growth over the last three years, Today in Energy, 7 August 2026 (43.6 GW at the end of 2025; nearly 52 GW at mid-2026; planned additions to 2028). EIA, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 19Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Lithium iron phosphate battery (energy density, cycle life, market share reports). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Department of Energy (ed.), Long Duration Storage Shot, launched 2021, cited from memory; the page address returned not found. US Department of Energy, Washington. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 48UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (ed.), Order No. 841, Electric Storage Participation in Markets Operated by Regional Transmission Organizations and Independent System Operators, February 2018, cited from memory. FERC, Washington. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: Dunn, B., Kamath, H. and Tarascon, J.-M., Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices, Science 334, 928 to 935, 2011, cited from memory. Observation year 2011. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Schmidt, O. et al., Projecting the future levelized cost of electricity storage technologies, Joule 3, 81 to 100, 2019, cited from memory. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: Albertus, P., Manser, J.S. and Litzelman, S., Long-duration electricity storage applications, economics, and technologies, Joule 4, 21 to 32, 2020, cited from memory. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: Sepulveda, N.A. et al., Design space for long-duration energy storage in decarbonised power systems, Nature Energy 6, 506 to 516, 2021, cited from memory. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Grid dependence on batteries while supply is restricted

A conditional statement under stated assumptions, never a prediction.

2 min read0 figures0 tables1 noteNR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

5.1Assumptions

Scenario SCN-XT16-SUP-01: what is assumed, and what is held constant.

Baseline
the 2026 reference state in this edition
Drivers
a trade measure on cells, cathode or graphite takes effect while grids rely on batteries for evening peaks
Analogues
the October 2025 export controls and the 2025 to 2026 lithium price rise8
Interventions
none modelled: the specification describes the unmitigated case
Run state
narrative specification; quantified run scheduled for 2027

5.2The cascade, step by step

  1. 1

    TRD → MIN

    a control on battery materials or equipment takes effect

    2025

  2. 2

    MIN → FIN

    cell and cathode prices rise and project schedules slip

    2026

  3. 3

    FIN → ENE

    fewer batteries are installed before evening peaks

    2026

  4. 4

    ENE → INF

    operators lean on gas plants and demand response in peak hours

    2026

  5. 5

    GOV → MIN

    regulators and states press for local processing and recycling

    2025

  6. 6

    FIN → MIN

    investment shifts to other chemistries and recycling

    2026

5.3The scenario as a table of steps

How the shock in scenario SCN-XT16-SUP-01 would travel through Advanced Energy Storage’s coupled systems, step by step, under the assumptions the edition states.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Trade to mineralsA control on battery materials or equipment takes effect. Analogue or source: 2025.Edition XT-16, scenario SCN-XT16-SUP-01, step 1
02 Minerals to financeCell and cathode prices rise and project schedules slip. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition XT-16, scenario SCN-XT16-SUP-01, step 2
03 Finance to energyFewer batteries are installed before evening peaks. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition XT-16, scenario SCN-XT16-SUP-01, step 3
04 Energy to infrastructureOperators lean on gas plants and demand response in peak hours. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition XT-16, scenario SCN-XT16-SUP-01, step 4
05 Governance to mineralsRegulators and states press for local processing and recycling. Analogue or source: 2025.Edition XT-16, scenario SCN-XT16-SUP-01, step 5
06 Finance to mineralsInvestment shifts to other chemistries and recycling. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition XT-16, scenario SCN-XT16-SUP-01, step 6

A teaching model of a conditional scenario under the edition’s stated assumptions: not a forecast, not a prediction and not a warning. Sources: Advanced Energy Storage 2026, scenario SCN-XT16-SUP-01 (2026); Advanced Energy Storage 2026, references (NR-CIT-1) (2026).

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 8IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (revised version, July 2026; concentration of refining, lithium price rise from January 2025 to April 2026, China export controls of 9 October 2025, LFP share of battery energy storage). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Readings from the other desks

The energy storage baseline is read through each steward’s lens, then once as a whole. Each lens is a projection of reviewed findings, not a separate argument. The other desks’ own editions of this subject are listed first, as cross-references, not copies.

15 min read0 figures8 tables39 notesNR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

6.1The other desks’ editions of this subject

Federation: each desk writes its own edition for the subjects in its remit. Until a desk releases, its edition shows its frame and the reading this edition printed for it.

DeskEditionStateIdentifier
GCRI Systems EvidenceNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
GRF Public DeliberationOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
GRA Capital ReadinessOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
Standards ProgressNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
Academy CapabilityNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
Index MeasurementOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit

6.2Three lenses

One edition, read by each steward. The lens of this site comes first.

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports reading energy storage as grid infrastructure and as a materials supply chain. Deployment is large and cost has fallen sharply, and supply is concentrated. Evidence is strongest for deployment and cost, and weakest for safety rates, long-duration volumes and recycling.

INF-001 · FIN-002 · MIN-006 · SYS-012

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people storage arrives as a headline about a battery plant, a fire or a cheaper bill. The baseline asks that public debate separate cost series, vendor claims and incident reports, and keep local safety questions in view.

FIN-002 · SAF-011 · INF-004

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. Costs fell about 30% in one year while input prices rebounded, and investment totals are not bound28. These show where finance-readiness evidence will matter. Nothing here is advice, a rating or an approval.

FIN-002 · FIN-003

NEXUS

Synthesis

Storage is well described by deployment and cost series and thinly measured as a system. The 2027 programme should bind incident rates, publish a cost bridge and test the supply-shock pathway before the next trade measure.

SYS-012 · Q-01 · Q-02

6.3Standards, Academy and steward contributions

How the Nexus Standards drafts, the Risk Academy and the three stewards feed each quarterly edition for energy storage. The standards are a preparatory working draft (2026) and are cited as drafts, never as adopted standards.

Table 6.1The quarterly rhythm every edition follows
QuarterEditionQuestionBoundary
Q1State and AgendaWhat matters this year, and what is the starting position?observed baseline stays distinct from planned work
Q2Evidence and BuildWhat new evidence and capability exist?a configured capability is not a validated result
Q3Stress Test and ReadinessWhat do scenarios and tests show?simulated loss or performance is not observed impact
Q4Annual Synthesis and RenewalWhat changed in the year, and what renews?release follows review, not event publicity deadlines
Table 6.2Who contributes what each quarter
Steward or bodyRoleContribution route
GCRI CanadaLead Institution and Consortium Secretariat; publisher of record; technical truth (key T)science and practice communities · GCRI gateway
The Global Risks Forum (GRF)leadership, dialogue and the Universe programme; public meaning (key M)policy, Universe and national adoption · GRF gateway
The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)finance, insurance and development readiness; capital meaning (key F)finance and insurance · GRA gateway
Nexus Standardspreparatory drafts on vocabulary, hazards, indicators and methodsStandards site · working groups HAZ, IND, MTH, FIN, AI
Risk Academylearning pathways tied to the agenda questionsAcademy gateway · learning by review
Nexus Standards and Academytechnology chapter inputs: GCRI evidence, NXS standards, RA capabilitytechnology editorial board

Standards drafts used in this edition

  • Risk vocabulary NRS-C1 (424 terms) for terms in the glossary
  • Hazard atlas NHS-1 1.1.0 (905 hazards in 120 families) for risk objects
  • Seven risk classes: global, catastrophic, existential, emerging, planetary, exponential, frontier-tech

Standards calendar to watch

  • Founding calls from 20 October 2026; working groups meet from 5 November 2026
  • Inaugural Global Standards Council session, 12 January 2027
  • Quarterly reviews in March, June, September and December, aligned with each edition

6.4GCRI reading: the model card

GCRI’s reading of this edition is its model card: what the national model is, what it computes and where it stops. It is printed in full in Annex A, with the methods it belongs to. Annex A, methodology

6.5Global Risks Forum reading: editorial essays

Four signed essays by the Reports editorial team set out the positions this edition takes. They are interpretation, labelled as such; the evidence they draw on is in the findings register.

Storage is a grid build-out and a supply chain. The first is fast and falling in cost; the second is concentrated and exposed to trade measures. Keeping them apart avoids both hype and complacency.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 01

Two stories, one technology

An installed system cost, a turnkey price and a battery cost index measure different things. This edition labels each and asks for a common basis before they are compared.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 02

Separate measures of cost

One large fire can shape a local market. Incident rates on a common basis would show whether risk falls with scale, chemistry and standards.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 03

Safety is the blind spot

Cells are cheap while materials are concentrated. Recycled content targets and the battery passport start in Europe, and recycling volumes are not yet measured.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 04

Supply and recycling decide the next decade

6.6Global Risks Alliance reading: 2027 energy storage readiness pack

The registers that open the 2027 global cycle. At baseline each is initialised from this edition.

Table 6.32027 energy storage readiness pack
ItemRegisterState at baselineFirst 2027 entry
E1Energy storage risk state deltabaseline set by this editionchanges against the baseline
E2WEFH+B state deltafive global system readings setindicator updates and freshness
E3Agenda and Portfolio movementeight agenda items · 6 proposed objectsadmission decisions
E4Federation delivery registernational chapters in preparationnational chapters
E5Consortium capability registernational consortia formingfirst contributions
E6Leadership questions and challengesnone yetfirst challenge log
E7Foundry technical statenational environments preparedfirst federation cut
E8Publication candidatestwelve findings carried forwardPUBLISH · HOLD dispositions
E9Universe readinessone candidate missionadmission and role spine
E10Correction registernonefirst federation-wide cycle

Publication dispositions

  • Publish
  • Hold
  • Needs evidence
  • Restricted
  • Superseded

6.7Nexus Standards reading: standards and regulatory watch

Instruments and published guidance that shape the systems in this edition, by status on the retrieval date. The edition assesses no one’s compliance.

  • IN FORCE
  • PUBLISHED
  • PROGRAMME
  • PUBLISHED · VOLUNTARY
Table 6.4Standards and regulatory watch
InstrumentBodyScopeStatusRelevance
Regulation (EU) 2023/15421011European UnionEUIN FORCEbatteries
UL 954030UL StandardsUS and CanadaPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYenergy storage systems
UL 9540A31UL StandardsUSPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYthermal runaway fire propagation test
NFPA 85532NFPAUSPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYinstallation of stationary systems
IEC 6261933IECglobalPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYsafety of industrial lithium cells
IEC 6305634IECglobalPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYsafety of lithium systems for storage
UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, 38.335United Nationsglobal transportPUBLISHEDtransport testing
IEC 62933-5-236IECglobalPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYgrid system safety
FERC Order 84148FERCUSIN FORCEwholesale market access
DOE Long Duration Storage Shot26US Department of EnergyUSPROGRAMMEcost target

Changed since 2024

  • EU rules on carbon footprint declaration and battery passport phase in from 2026 and 202710
  • Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/606 set the method for recycling efficiency, published 4 July 202511
  • China announced battery supply chain export controls on 9 October 2025, with some suspended until November 20268

To watch in 2027

  • The EU battery passport from 18 February 202710
  • Delegated acts on recycled content and carbon footprint under the EU regulation1011
  • Revisions to the installation code and fire test standards3132

6.8Risk Academy reading: literature and evidence review, science and assessments

The review behind this edition covers energy storage assessments, peer-reviewed science and the institutional reports that bind its findings. Systematic reviews for each agenda item begin in 2027.

Review protocol

Question
What does the published evidence establish about advanced energy storage as infrastructure and its couplings?
Sources searched
peer-reviewed journals; agencies and institutions; standards bodies and regulations; supply and market analyses
Window
releases available at evidence close, 30 September 2026
Selection
sources that bind or contextualise a finding in this edition
Next step
systematic reviews for agenda items 01 to 05 in 2027
Table 6.5Peer-reviewed science and reviews
ReferenceTypeYearRoleUsed for
Dunn, Kamath and Tarascon38journal article2011frameworkgrid storage options
Schmidt et al.39journal article2019supportscost projections
Albertus, Manser and Litzelman40journal article2020supportslong-duration economics
Sepulveda et al.41journal article2021supportslong-duration design space
Hunter et al.42journal article2021supportslong-duration costs
Armand and Tarascon43journal article2008frameworkbattery research
Goodenough and Park44journal article2013frameworklithium-ion perspective
Larcher and Tarascon45journal article2015contextsustainable batteries
Table 6.6Agency and institutional flagships
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
IEA Global Energy Review 20261IEA2026supportsdeployment
IRENA cost report2IRENA2026supportscost
EIA Today in Energy3EIA2026supportsUS capacity
Ember Global Electricity Review4Ember2026supportscost and solar shifting
IEA batteries slides9IEA2024contextoutlook to 2030
IEA Global EV Outlook 2026 slides12IEA2026contextbattery demand context
BNEF cost survey28BNEF2025contextcost series cited by IRENA
Lazard LCOE+29Lazard2025contextstorage cost comparison
NREL Storage Futures Study27NREL2021contextdeployment scenarios
Table 6.7Standards, policy and strategies
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Regulation (EU) 2023/154210European Union2023supportsbattery rules
European Commission batteries page11European Commission2025supportsimplementation dates
UL 9540 and 9540A3031UL Standards2023contextsystem safety and fire testing
NFPA 85532NFPA2023contextinstallation code
IEC 6261933 and IEC 6305634IEC2022contextcell and system safety
UN Manual 38.335United Nations2023contexttransport testing
IEC 62933-5-236IEC2020contextgrid system safety
FERC Order 84148FERC2018contextmarket access
DOE Long Duration Storage Shot26US Department of Energy2021contextcost target
Table 6.8Supply, vendor and field overviews
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
USGS lithium5USGS2026supportslithium supply
USGS cobalt6USGS2026supportscobalt supply
USGS graphite7USGS2026supportsgraphite supply
IEA Critical Minerals Outlook 20268IEA2026supportsconcentration and controls
Form Energy page13vendor2026contextvendor claim
EPRI incident database25EPRI2025contextincident data, not read
IHA hydropower outlook37IHA2025contextpumped storage
CATL announcement47vendor2025contextsodium-ion claim
Feng et al.46journal article2018contextthermal runaway

Where the evidence agrees

  • Battery storage deployment and cost series moved sharply in 202512
  • Lithium iron phosphate dominates new stationary deployments12
  • Materials supply is concentrated678

Where it is unsettled

  • How cost measures from different sources compare2428
  • How large incident rates are on a common basis1425
  • How much long-duration storage will be built and at what cost21326

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 2IRENA (ed.), Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2025, 2026 (installed cost of four-hour utility-scale battery storage about USD 140 per kWh, down close to 30%; total installed cost by storage technology; solar paired with batteries). International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 8IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (revised version, July 2026; concentration of refining, lithium price rise from January 2025 to April 2026, China export controls of 9 October 2025, LFP share of battery energy storage). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 10European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries (full text; battery passport from 18 February 2027; safety of stationary battery energy storage systems, Article 12; recycled content targets). Official Journal of the European Union, Luxembourg. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 11European Commission (ed.), Batteries (policy page; Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 in force 17 August 2023, applies from 18 February 2024; Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/606 of 4 July 2025 on recycling efficiency). Directorate-General for Environment, Brussels. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: UL Standards and Engagement (ed.), UL 9540, Energy Storage Systems and Equipment, third edition 2023, cited from memory; the catalogue page showed no document text. UL, Northbrook. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: UL Standards and Engagement (ed.), UL 9540A, Test Method for Evaluating Thermal Runaway Fire Propagation in Battery Energy Storage Systems, cited from memory. UL, Northbrook. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 32UNVERIFIED, not opened: National Fire Protection Association (ed.), NFPA 855, Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems, 2023 edition, cited from memory; the page showed only the title. NFPA, Quincy. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Electrotechnical Commission (ed.), IEC 62619:2022, Safety requirements for secondary lithium cells and batteries for use in industrial applications, cited from memory. IEC, Geneva. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 34UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Electrotechnical Commission (ed.), IEC 63056:2020, Safety requirements for secondary lithium cells and batteries for use in electrical energy storage systems, cited from memory. IEC, Geneva. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: United Nations (ed.), Manual of Tests and Criteria, section 38.3, lithium metal and lithium ion batteries, cited from memory; the page returned an access error. United Nations, Geneva. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Electrotechnical Commission (ed.), IEC 62933-5-2, Electrical energy storage systems, safety requirements for grid-integrated systems, electrochemical-based systems, cited from memory. IEC, Geneva. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 48UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (ed.), Order No. 841, Electric Storage Participation in Markets Operated by Regional Transmission Organizations and Independent System Operators, February 2018, cited from memory. FERC, Washington. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Department of Energy (ed.), Long Duration Storage Shot, launched 2021, cited from memory; the page address returned not found. US Department of Energy, Washington. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: Dunn, B., Kamath, H. and Tarascon, J.-M., Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices, Science 334, 928 to 935, 2011, cited from memory. Observation year 2011. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Schmidt, O. et al., Projecting the future levelized cost of electricity storage technologies, Joule 3, 81 to 100, 2019, cited from memory. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: Albertus, P., Manser, J.S. and Litzelman, S., Long-duration electricity storage applications, economics, and technologies, Joule 4, 21 to 32, 2020, cited from memory. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: Sepulveda, N.A. et al., Design space for long-duration energy storage in decarbonised power systems, Nature Energy 6, 506 to 516, 2021, cited from memory. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 42UNVERIFIED, not opened: Hunter, C.A. et al., Techno-economic analysis of long-duration energy storage and flexible power generation technologies to support high-variable renewable energy grids, Joule 5, 2077 to 2101, 2021, cited from memory. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 43UNVERIFIED, not opened: Armand, M. and Tarascon, J.-M., Building better batteries, Nature 451, 652 to 657, 2008, cited from memory. Observation year 2008. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 44UNVERIFIED, not opened: Goodenough, J.B. and Park, K.-S., The Li-ion rechargeable battery: a perspective, Journal of the American Chemical Society 135, 1167 to 1176, 2013, cited from memory. Observation year 2013. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 45UNVERIFIED, not opened: Larcher, D. and Tarascon, J.-M., Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage, Nature Chemistry 7, 19 to 29, 2015, cited from memory. Observation year 2015. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 1IEA (ed.), Global Energy Review 2026, section Technology: Battery storage (108 GW of new battery storage deployed in 2025, 40% more than in 2024; about 80% utility-scale; lithium iron phosphate about 90% of deployments; China about 60% of additions; battery-based UPS additions up 30% to 45 GW). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 3US Energy Information Administration (ed.), Battery storage capacity averaged 70% growth over the last three years, Today in Energy, 7 August 2026 (43.6 GW at the end of 2025; nearly 52 GW at mid-2026; planned additions to 2028). EIA, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  24. 4Ember (ed.), Global Electricity Review 2026, 21 April 2026 (battery costs down 45% in 2025 after 20% in 2024; deployment up 46% to an estimated 250 GWh; 14% of new solar generation shifted). Ember, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  25. 9Wanner, B. (IEA), Batteries and Secure Energy Transitions, presentation slides, Energy Storage Summit, London, 18 February 2025 (slides summarising the IEA special report of 2024; storage capacity needed for tripled renewables; stated policies battery additions to 2030; lithium demand measures). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  26. 12IEA (ed.), Global EV Outlook 2026, launch webinar slides, 20 May 2026 (electric cars 25% of sales in 2025, 28% forecast for 2026; battery pack price declines in China). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  27. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: BloombergNEF (ed.), Energy Storage System Cost Survey 2025, cited only as the source of the series reported by IRENA; not opened. BloombergNEF, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  28. 29UNVERIFIED, not opened: Lazard (ed.), Levelized Cost of Energy Plus, 2025 edition, cited from memory. Lazard, New York. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  29. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (ed.), Storage Futures Study, 2021, cited from memory; the host was not reachable. NREL, Golden. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  30. 5USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Lithium (world mine production 2025, end uses, prices, reserves). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  31. 6USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Cobalt (Democratic Republic of the Congo share, export quotas 2026 and 2027, import reliance). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  32. 7USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Graphite (Natural) (China share of production, anode material imports, preliminary duties). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  33. 13Form Energy (ed.), Battery technology page (iron-air system described as able to discharge for up to 100 hours). Vendor statement, weak evidence, not independently tested. Form Energy, Somerville. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  34. 25UNVERIFIED, not opened: EPRI (ed.), Battery Energy Storage System Failure Incident Database (the page returned no data; incident rate figures seen only in a secondary summary). Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  35. 37UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Hydropower Association (ed.), World Hydropower Outlook 2025 (the page loaded but the report was not read; the 2025 pumped storage figure appears only in a secondary summary). IHA, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  36. 47UNVERIFIED, not opened: CATL (ed.), announcement of the Naxtra sodium-ion battery brand, April 2025, known only from a secondary summary; the company news page was fetched but no article was read. Contemporary Amperex Technology, Ningde. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  37. 46UNVERIFIED, not opened: Feng, X. et al., Thermal runaway mechanism of lithium ion battery for electric vehicles: a review, Energy Storage Materials 10, 246 to 267, 2018, cited from memory. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  38. 14Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Moss Landing Power Plant (fire of 16 January 2025; 300 MW and 1,200 MWh phase; about 1,200 residents evacuated). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  39. 24Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Cobalt (Democratic Republic of the Congo production share quoted at different values from cited sources). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

The 2027 agenda

Eight bounded questions open the 2027 energy storage agenda. Each comes from a baseline finding, names the initiative that will carry it and the first output due in the 2027 energy storage edition.

5 min read0 figures6 tables3 notesNR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

7.1Questions for the operational series

  1. Q-01

    How many battery fires and thermal events occur per unit of capacity, and how do rates differ by chemistry and age?

    INI-XT16-SAF-01 · safety incident data; first output: incident register on a common basis.

  2. Q-02

    Which cell, cathode, anode and equipment steps are single points of failure, and how do export controls change them?

    INI-XT16-SUP-02 · cell and materials supply; first output: dependence map.

  3. Q-03

    How much long-duration storage is operating and under construction, by technology and duration?

    INI-XT16-LDS-03 · long-duration evidence; first output: deployment table by technology.

  4. Q-04

    What recycling capacity exists, and what recovered volumes meet the recycled content targets?

    INI-XT16-REC-04 · recycling and passport; first output: capacity and passport readiness map.

  5. Q-05

    How can installed cost, turnkey price and pack price be compared on one basis?

    INI-XT16-CST-05 · costs on a common basis; first output: cost bridge table.

  6. Q-06

    Which national markets set storage targets or procurement rules, and how do they differ?

    To be admitted in 2027; first output: policy overlay.

  7. Q-07

    What workforce exists for installation, operation and fire response?

    To be admitted in 2027; first output: scoping note.

  8. Q-08

    Which readiness capabilities have been tested in real events, and which are only planned?

    Readiness capability register; first output: rung evidence for 15 functions.

7.2Portfolio proposed for the Q1 2027 alignment

Five initiatives and one Universe mission candidate are proposed for the 2027 storage portfolio. They are programme objects: no partner, funder or member is attached to them in this edition.

Table 7.1Objects proposed for the first operational quarter
IDObjectKindQuestionState
INI-XT16-SAF-01Safety incident dataInitiativeQ-01PROPOSED
INI-XT16-SUP-02Cell and materials supplyInitiativeQ-02PROPOSED
INI-XT16-LDS-03Long-duration evidenceInitiativeQ-03PROPOSED
INI-XT16-REC-04Recycling and passportInitiativeQ-04PROPOSED
INI-XT16-CST-05Costs on a common basisInitiativeQ-05PROPOSED
MSN-XT16-2027-01Evening peak Universe missionMissionQ-02Candidate

7.3The pathway

The energy storage edition reads national readiness chapters, the coupled sector reports on energy, minerals and infrastructure, and the global edition through one governed evidence graph. At baseline the federation is designed; the global energy and lifeline editions are drafted. This page states what exists today and what comes next.

  1. 01

    National readiness chapters

    storage and grid-flexibility readiness in each national edition

    IN PREPARATION · national baselines

  2. 02

    Sector couplings

    GS-02 energy · SR-04 minerals · XT-12 materials

    GS-02 DRAFTED · sector baselines

  3. 03

    Technology system model

    cells, long-duration options, minerals, safety, governance

    v0 SPECIFIED · v1 with federation evidence

  4. 04

    Strategic links

    SR-02 lifeline systems · SR-13 strategic technology

    PLANNED · strategic baselines

  5. 05

    Universe

    annual proving environment

    CANDIDATE MISSION · mandate in 2027

  6. 06

    XT-16 report

    this series

    BASELINE DRAFT · 2027 annual edition

  7. 07

    Evidence and correction

    one graph, many projections

    OPEN · first correction cycle in 2027

7.4Universe 2027: evidence pack for the energy storage candidate mission

  1. 01

    Mandate

  2. 02

    Core Build · 1 month

  3. 03

    Action · 1 week

  4. 04

    Evidence seal

  5. 05

    Portfolio correction

  6. 06

    Next mandate

Table 7.2Universe 2027: evidence pack for the energy storage candidate mission
ItemRecordStateTiming
F1Annual mandate recordPLANNEDafter the Q2 2027 alignment
F2Core Build recordPLANNEDone month before the exercise
F3Exercise evidencePLANNEDduring the Action week
F4Decision packetsPLANNEDexercise state only
F5Proof receiptsPLANNEDscoped to each recorded check
F6After-action reportPLANNEDwithin one quarter
F7Upgrade docketPLANNEDrouted to the Portfolio
F8Portfolio renewalPLANNED2027 global annual edition
F9Public synthesisPLANNEDpublic-safe extracts only

Mission

ID
MSN-XT16-2027-01 · Evening peak Universe mission
Role spine
Leadership sponsor · Institutional anchor · Mission lead: drawn from national pathways
Receiving actors
to be identified with the mandate

7.5Handoffs and routing

Where the baseline’s findings go next. A handoff routes a finding for awareness, review or work; it transfers no authority.

Table 7.3Handoffs and routing
FindingRouted toPurposeClass
INF-001 · deploymentINI-XT16-CST-05costs on a common basisPUBLIC
FIN-002 · costINI-XT16-CST-05costs on a common basisPUBLIC
INF-004 · US capacityregional consortiapolicy overlayPUBLIC
MIN-006 · cobaltINI-XT16-SUP-02cell and materials supplyPUBLIC
MIN-007 · graphiteINI-XT16-SUP-02cell and materials supplyPUBLIC
GOV-008 · battery regulationINI-XT16-REC-04recycling and passportPUBLIC
SAF-011 · fire recordINI-XT16-SAF-01 · key F reviewsafety incident dataPUBLIC
SYS-012 · compound pathwayMSN-XT16-2027-01Universe candidateCONSORTIUM
Table 7.4Routing rules by publication class
ClassWhere it goesWho can see it
PUBLICthe published edition and its evidence bundleanyone
CONSORTIUMgoverned rooms of the federationconsortium members under agreement
CONTROLLEDneed-to-know channelsnamed competent actors only

7.6Feeds and signal register

Table 7.5Feeds watched from 2027
FeedProducerLatencyFeeds into
Agency capacity statisticsEIA and national agenciesmonthly to annualINF-004
IEA and IRENA annual reportsIEA, IRENAannualINF-001
Electricity reviewsEmberannualFIN-003
Mineral Commodity SummariesUSGSannualMIN-005
Critical minerals outlookIEAannualMIN-007
EU battery regulation pagesEuropean Commissionper releaseGOV-008
Incident databasesEPRI and agenciescontinuousSAF-011

Escalation routes

  • none · keep monitoring
  • research question
  • project
  • risk object
  • annual publication
  • signal report
Table 7.6Signals at baseline
IDSignalCorroborationSystemsRoute
SIG-XT16-001Installed cost fell about 30% in 20252CORROBORATEDFIN · ENEresearch question Q-05
SIG-XT16-002China battery export controls of October 20258PARTIALTRD · MINinitiative Q-02
SIG-XT16-003Moss Landing fire of January 202514PARTIALINFresearch question Q-01

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 2IRENA (ed.), Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2025, 2026 (installed cost of four-hour utility-scale battery storage about USD 140 per kWh, down close to 30%; total installed cost by storage technology; solar paired with batteries). International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 8IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (revised version, July 2026; concentration of refining, lithium price rise from January 2025 to April 2026, China export controls of 9 October 2025, LFP share of battery energy storage). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 14Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Moss Landing Power Plant (fire of 16 January 2025; 300 MW and 1,200 MWh phase; about 1,200 residents evacuated). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Systems in depth

One section per system: its state at evidence close, its exposures and what the operational series will watch.

9 min read0 figures5 tables24 notesNR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

8.1Cells, chemistries and storage technologies

Storage uses several technologies. Evidence is strongest for lithium-ion batteries and pumped storage, and weakest where claims rest on vendor announcements or secondary summaries.

108GW

battery storage added worldwide, 20251

≈90%

lithium iron phosphate share of deployments1

≈80%

utility-scale share of 2025 additions1

Table 8.1State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Lithium iron phosphate batteriesabout 90% of deployments, up from well below half five years ago119Reported
Pumped storage hydropowerinstalled cost USD 153 per kWh; round-trip efficiency of 70 to 80%; pumped storage was the largest storage type in 2023 by capacity21716Reported
Sodium-ion batteriesa producer reported 175 Wh per kg for its 2025 line; field data not bound1847Reported
Flow batteries and iron-air systemsa 100 MW, 400 MWh vanadium system began operating in China in 2022; compressed air plants run in Germany, the United States and China; one vendor claims up to 100 hours202113Reported

Couplings

  • ENE ↔ FIN deployment and cost
  • MIN → ENE materials
  • INF → ENE safety and siting

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • long-duration deployment by technology
  • field performance on a common basis

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • XT-12 Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology
  • XT-14 Fusion and Frontier Energy
  • XT-17 Climate Technologies and Carbon Management

8.2Grid role, energy and water

Batteries shift solar output into the evening and are moving from short ancillary services toward energy shifting. Water and cooling use is not published on a common basis.

≈25%

utility-scale solar paired with batteries, 20252

14%

new solar generation shifted by installed batteries, 20254

45GW

battery backup power additions for data centres, 20251

Table 8.2State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Solar pairingabout a quarter of utility-scale solar commissioned in 2025 was paired with batteries2Reported
Solar shiftinginstalled batteries could shift about 14% of new solar generation; Chile and Australia over 50%4Reported
Durationmost projects cluster around two hours; more are four hours or longer1Reported
Water usenot published for pumped storage and thermal systems17Expert input

Couplings

  • ENE → CLI solar shifting
  • ENE ↔ INF facility siting
  • AIC → ENE backup power

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • water use by technology
  • grid service performance data

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • XT-12 Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology
  • XT-14 Fusion and Frontier Energy
  • XT-17 Climate Technologies and Carbon Management

8.3Minerals, materials and supply chain

Cells depend on lithium, graphite and cobalt, and on refining that is concentrated. Lithium prices almost doubled from January 2025 to April 2026.

290thousand tons

world lithium mine production, 20255

73%

cobalt mined in the Democratic Republic of the Congo6

82%

China share of natural graphite production7

Table 8.3State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Lithiumproduction up 31% in 2025; batteries are 88% of end use5Reported
Cobaltexport quotas of up to 96,600 tons a year for 2026 and 2027624Reported
Graphitepreliminary antidumping duty of 93.50% on Chinese anode material in the United States7Reported
Refiningtop refined supplier share averaged about 72% across energy minerals in 20258Reported

Couplings

  • MIN → ENE materials
  • TRD → MIN export controls
  • FIN → MIN processing investment

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • cell capacity by country
  • recycled volumes against targets

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • XT-12 Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology
  • XT-14 Fusion and Frontier Energy
  • XT-17 Climate Technologies and Carbon Management

8.4Economy, investment and workforce

Costs fell sharply in 2025 and deployment rose. Investment totals and workforce numbers are the thin parts of the evidence.

140USD per kWh

installed cost, four-hour battery, 20252

45%

fall in battery costs in 2025, Ember measure4

≈30%

fall in installed cost in 2025, IRENA measure2

Table 8.4State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Installed costfell about 30% in 2025 to USD 140 per kWh2Reported
Battery cost indexEmber reports a fall of 45% in 2025 and 20% in 20244Reported
Outlookthe IEA stated policies scenario adds over 700 GW of battery storage from 2024 to 20309Scenario
Workforceskills gaps reported; no figure bound26Expert input

Couplings

  • FIN → ENE scale-up
  • MIN → FIN input prices
  • HLT → ENE workforce

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • investment totals
  • workforce size and skills gaps

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • XT-12 Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology
  • XT-14 Fusion and Frontier Energy
  • XT-17 Climate Technologies and Carbon Management

8.5Safety, regulation and governance watch

The nearest governance questions for storage are fire safety, battery passports, recycled content and trade measures. Rules exist, and several dates fall in 2026 and 2027.

2027date

EU battery passport from 18 February10

2031date

recycled content targets for cobalt, lead, lithium, nickel10

9 Oct 2025date

China announced battery supply chain export controls8

Table 8.5State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Battery regulationRegulation (EU) 2023/1542 applies from 18 February 2024; safety documentation for stationary systems1011Reported
Safety standardssystem safety, fire propagation testing and installation codes exist303132Reported
Incident recordone 2025 fire at a 300 MW, 1,200 MWh plant, from a secondary summary14Reported
Trade measuresexport controls announced in 2025; some suspended until November 20268Reported

Couplings

  • INF → ENE safety and siting
  • GOV → DAT battery passport
  • GOV → TRD trade measures

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • incident rates on a common basis
  • status of delegated acts

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • XT-12 Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology
  • XT-14 Fusion and Frontier Energy
  • XT-17 Climate Technologies and Carbon Management

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1IEA (ed.), Global Energy Review 2026, section Technology: Battery storage (108 GW of new battery storage deployed in 2025, 40% more than in 2024; about 80% utility-scale; lithium iron phosphate about 90% of deployments; China about 60% of additions; battery-based UPS additions up 30% to 45 GW). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 19Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Lithium iron phosphate battery (energy density, cycle life, market share reports). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 2IRENA (ed.), Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2025, 2026 (installed cost of four-hour utility-scale battery storage about USD 140 per kWh, down close to 30%; total installed cost by storage technology; solar paired with batteries). International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 17Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Pumped-storage hydroelectricity (round-trip efficiency of 70 to 80%; world capacity about 200 GW in 2025 attributed to the hydropower association). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 16Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Grid energy storage (pumped storage and battery capacity in 2023 from an IEA dataset). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 18Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Sodium-ion battery (energy density figures; producer announcements of 2025; cost claims marked as needing update). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 47UNVERIFIED, not opened: CATL (ed.), announcement of the Naxtra sodium-ion battery brand, April 2025, known only from a secondary summary; the company news page was fetched but no article was read. Contemporary Amperex Technology, Ningde. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 20Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Flow battery (vanadium system of 100 MW and 400 MWh in Dalian, 2022). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 21Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Compressed-air energy storage (Huntorf, McIntosh and Zhangjiakou plants). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 13Form Energy (ed.), Battery technology page (iron-air system described as able to discharge for up to 100 hours). Vendor statement, weak evidence, not independently tested. Form Energy, Somerville. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 4Ember (ed.), Global Electricity Review 2026, 21 April 2026 (battery costs down 45% in 2025 after 20% in 2024; deployment up 46% to an estimated 250 GWh; 14% of new solar generation shifted). Ember, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 5USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Lithium (world mine production 2025, end uses, prices, reserves). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 6USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Cobalt (Democratic Republic of the Congo share, export quotas 2026 and 2027, import reliance). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 7USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Graphite (Natural) (China share of production, anode material imports, preliminary duties). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 24Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Cobalt (Democratic Republic of the Congo production share quoted at different values from cited sources). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 8IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (revised version, July 2026; concentration of refining, lithium price rise from January 2025 to April 2026, China export controls of 9 October 2025, LFP share of battery energy storage). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 9Wanner, B. (IEA), Batteries and Secure Energy Transitions, presentation slides, Energy Storage Summit, London, 18 February 2025 (slides summarising the IEA special report of 2024; storage capacity needed for tripled renewables; stated policies battery additions to 2030; lithium demand measures). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Department of Energy (ed.), Long Duration Storage Shot, launched 2021, cited from memory; the page address returned not found. US Department of Energy, Washington. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 10European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries (full text; battery passport from 18 February 2027; safety of stationary battery energy storage systems, Article 12; recycled content targets). Official Journal of the European Union, Luxembourg. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 11European Commission (ed.), Batteries (policy page; Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 in force 17 August 2023, applies from 18 February 2024; Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/606 of 4 July 2025 on recycling efficiency). Directorate-General for Environment, Brussels. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: UL Standards and Engagement (ed.), UL 9540, Energy Storage Systems and Equipment, third edition 2023, cited from memory; the catalogue page showed no document text. UL, Northbrook. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: UL Standards and Engagement (ed.), UL 9540A, Test Method for Evaluating Thermal Runaway Fire Propagation in Battery Energy Storage Systems, cited from memory. UL, Northbrook. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 32UNVERIFIED, not opened: National Fire Protection Association (ed.), NFPA 855, Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems, 2023 edition, cited from memory; the page showed only the title. NFPA, Quincy. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  24. 14Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Moss Landing Power Plant (fire of 16 January 2025; 300 MW and 1,200 MWh phase; about 1,200 residents evacuated). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Methodology

How the edition was made: methods, the model card, the evidence cut and its age, the acceptance record and the glossary.

13 min read0 figures13 tables16 notesNR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

A.1Methods

The global baseline uses published values and four simple derivations. Each is shown in full so that any reader can reproduce it.

Table A.1Methods
No.DerivationCalculationResult
(1)Battery storage added in 2024 implied by 40% growth108 ÷ 1.40≈ 77 GW
(2)Fall in installed cost, 2010 to 20251 − 140 ÷ 2,634about 95%
(3)US utility-scale capacity at mid-202643.6 + 8.3≈ 51.9 GW
(4)US additions planned from the second half of 2026 to 202814 + 26 + 1454 GW
Table A.2Coupling strength scale (matrix and model card)
StrengthDefinition
STRONGa disruption in the source system has historically changed the target system’s service or output within one season, in more than one region
MODERATEan effect is documented but buffered or slower
WEAKan effect is plausible but not documented at global scale
Table A.3Status grammar
LabelRule
Reportedvalue as issued by its source, with year
Inferredreasoned from cited evidence; never a measurement
EstimatedNexus analytical value with stated method
Scenarioconditional on stated assumptions
Expert inputstructured editorial judgement awaiting evidence

A.2Model card, Energy storage System Model v0

Model ID
MDL-XT16-STORAGE · v0.1
Purpose
represent advanced energy storage as infrastructure coupled to power systems, minerals, trade, finance, safety and recycling
Family
graph-based system of systems
Inputs
the cited sources of this edition; no proprietary data
Method
expert-specified coupling strengths (STRONG · MODERATE · WEAK) from assessments and analogue events
Validation
none yet, first validation against federation evidence in 2027
Uncertainty
qualitative; strengths are hypotheses, not measurements
Domain of validity
global scale; not for asset-, site- or country-level use
Reproducibility
strength table and sources published in this edition
20couplings

typed in v0

0strong

documented within one season

0moderate

documented, buffered

20weak

plausible, undocumented

A.3The baseline evidence cut

Every Nexus edition is published from a frozen evidence cut. The global baseline cut is documentary: it pins the exact edition of every source cited. Federation cuts begin with the first national Foundry cuts in 2027.

Cut ID
DC-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Type
baseline documentary cut
Resolution policy
pinned · as of 30 September 2026
Sources pinned
48 cited sources, each at the edition and access date in the references
Model runs
none at baseline, analytical values are stated with their method
Digest
computed at freeze and recorded in the publication record
Supersedes
nothing, first cut of the series
Superseded by
the 2027 energy storage annual cut

Lineage

  1. 01

    source edition

  2. 02

    pinned citation

  3. 03

    finding

  4. 04

    page

  5. 05

    publication record

Table A.4From the baseline cut to the federation cut
ElementBaseline 20262027 global annual
Sourcescited global publications, pinned by editionnational, regional and sector cuts through one graph
Analysisstated methods and editorial estimatestyped analysis specifications
ModelsEnergy storage System Model v0 specificationmodel runs with receipts
Findingstwelve baseline findingsfindings re-bound to federation evidence
Reviewfive passes scheduledfive passes on the exact digest

A.4Evidence age and coverage

A 2026 global edition rests on evidence observed in many different years. This page shows each time base, so that no single year label hides older evidence.

Table A.5Evidence age and coverage
IndicatorObservedReleasedCadenceNext release
Deployment2025Global Energy Review 2026annualnext review
Installed cost2025IRENA July 2026annualnext cost report
US capacity2025 to 2026EIA August 2026periodicnext EIA note
Lithium and cobalt2025USGS 2026 summariesannualnext summaries
Critical minerals outlook2025IEA 2026annualnext outlook
EU regulation2023Regulation textperiodicdelegated acts
Moss Landing record2025secondary summaryone-offagency report
Export controls2025 to 2026IEA 2026per eventNovember 2026 review
Table A.6Coverage by system at baseline
SystemCoverageThinnest dimension
DeploymentGOODregional data on a common basis
CostPARTIALcommon basis across sources
SupplyPARTIALrecycling volumes
GovernancePARTIALstatus of delegated acts
Long durationTHINdeployment by technology
SafetyTHINincident rates
SkillsTHINworkforce numbers
RecyclingTHINcapacity and recovered volumes
Table A.7Designed empty states: what is not bound, what would fill it and why
FieldSource that would fill itBlocker
Energy storage investment totals on a common basisnational agencies, market surveys, development banksnot retrieved; the cost survey behind the IRENA series was not opened28
Long-duration storage deployment by technology and durationagencies, system operators, hydropower associationonly unit costs read2; the hydropower outlook report was not opened37; one vendor claim13
Battery fire and thermal event rates on a common basisEPRI incident database and agency reports25the database page returned no data; the Moss Landing record comes from a secondary summary14
Recycling capacity and recovered volumesnational agencies, recyclers, European Commissionnot retrieved; only regulation targets read10
Sodium-ion performance and output from primary datapeer-reviewed tests, producer data, national agenciessecondary summary and vendor announcement only1847
Water use of pumped storage and thermal systemsoperators, regulators, peer-reviewed studiesnot retrieved
Chinese storage capacity from national sourcesnational energy administration and industry bodiesnot retrieved; the figure found is in a secondary source15
Status of EU battery due diligence obligations after August 2025Official Journal and Commission notices10the regulation text read states 18 August 2025; later changes were not checked
Status of China battery export controls after November 2026Chinese ministry notices and IEA updates8the IEA outlook records a suspension to November 2026; no later source read
Grid service performance of large batteries from system operator datasystem operator reportsthe operator page returned an access error; secondary summary only22
Field degradation and lifetime of installed systemsoperators, peer-reviewed field studiesnot retrieved
Storage workforce size and skills gapsnational statistics, industry surveysnot retrieved; capability rung stays LISTED
IEA batteries report text beyond the slide setIEA Batteries and Secure Energy Transitions report9the report page returned an access error; slides read
Capability rungs beyond standards and planningagencies, operators, laboratoriesnot reviewed

A.5Evidence cards, two anchor sources

Published by IRENA in 2026. Annual report. Role: binds FIN-002 and the cost tiles. Coverage: global averages by technology; project mix varies.

EVD-XT16-001

Renewable Power Generation Costs in 20252

Published by the IEA in 2026. Annual report. Role: binds INF-001 and the deployment tiles. Coverage: global and regional additions in 2025.

EVD-XT16-002

Global Energy Review 2026, battery storage section1

Table A.8Quality dimensions at baseline
DimensionEVD-XT16-001EVD-XT16-002
Completenessglobal averages; few projects for emerging optionsglobal and regional additions
Timelinesspublished about six months after year endpublished within the following year
Revisionannual editionannual edition
Method transparencycost definitions stateddefinitions stated in the report
External validationattributed series from a market surveyagency review

Evidence cards to follow in 2027

  • IRENA2: cost survey series and definitions
  • IEA1: regional data tables
  • EIA3: generator inventory
  • USGS5: next lithium summary

A.6Publication acceptance record

Editorial self-check at evidence close. Every applicable item carries a disposition; the remaining items are review, approval and deposit.

Table A.9Publication acceptance record
GroupAreaItemsPassN/APending
D1Identity and scope8800
D2Source and data12912
D3Analysis and models12381
D4Findings and claims9801
D5Figures, tables, maps10622
D6Editorial and citations10802
D7Review and approval130013
D8Artefact and design12705
D9Registry and release9009

Publication gate

Conditions met
14 of 23 at evidence close
Blocking problems
none recorded
Open conditions
reviews, approval of the exact digest, deposit, registry pointer

Not applicable at baseline

Model runs
first runs in Q1 2027
Maps
plates in Q2 2027
Waivers
none

A.7Status words

Table A.10The status every value carries
StatusWhat it means
ObservedMeasured directly and published by the source.
ReportedPublished statistics of an official or institutional source.
DeclaredStated by the body concerned; not independently measured.
EstimatedA Nexus estimate from cited evidence, with its method in Annex A.
ModelledProduced by a stated model from cited inputs.
InferredReasoned from cited evidence; not measured.
ForecastA projection by the cited source.
SimulatedA simulation result under stated assumptions.
ScenarioA conditional statement under stated assumptions; never a prediction.
Expert inputExpert judgement, recorded with its basis.
CandidateProposed for a later edition; not yet evidence.
Evidence-quality levels (EQL 1 to 5) grade the source behind a value; they are not a score of the subject.

A.8How the edition is made, released and corrected

Every edition is built from a sealed evidence cut, reviewed under three keys, signed and deposited before any site shows it as published; corrections go to Nexus Standards as change proposals and feed the next cut.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Evidence arrives from the pillarsFoundry seals observations and indicator series, Universe hands over after-action and scenario findings, and contributions are screened at every gateway, including this site’s.
02 The cut is sealedOn the cut date the evidence is pinned under one identifier, so anyone can rebuild the edition from exactly what it was built on.
03 The edition is assembledThe edition is drafted from its template and content pack. Agents may draft; they never publish and never decide.
04 The keys turnAt the publisher of record the truth key comes first: every value is checked against its source or stated method before the meaning and capital keys turn. No edition moves on until every key has been turned by a named steward.
05 The gate opensA named approver releases one exact digest of the edition; any change after this point is a new version, never a silent edit.
06 Signed and depositedThe PDF, the web edition and the data bundle are signed together with a manifest and an RO-Crate description, and deposited on Zenodo with a concept and a version DOI.
07 Published on its desk’s siteOnly then does the edition show as published on its desk’s Reports site, and the Collection lists it as a part.
08 Corrections go to StandardsMethod and correction findings go to Nexus Standards as change proposals; citations, corrections and new contributions feed the next evidence cut.

A teaching model of the process, not a forecast and not a record of any run; dates and counts on this page come from the programme record. Sources: Reports governance at GCRI Canada (2026); Zenodo, repository of record for Reports deposits (2026).

Lifecycle, one state at a time: Draft, Computed, Evidence bound, Reviewed, Approved for release, Published, Corrected, Superseded. This edition is a draft.

A.9Glossary and abbreviations

Table A.11Series terms
TermMeaning
Baseline Editionthe inaugural annual edition that fixes the reference state for the series
WEFH+Bwater, energy, food, health and biodiversity, the national nexus core
Couplinga typed dependency through which one system transmits to another
Protection gapthe share of losses not covered by insurance
Capability ladderLISTED → EXISTS → ADEQUATE → TESTED → DEMONSTRATED
EQLevidence-quality level, 1–5
Evidence cuta frozen resolution of exact sources and versions
NNC · NLC · NWGNational Nexus Consortium · National Leadership Council · National Working Groups
Table A.12Abbreviations used in this edition
AbbreviationExpansion
AAManode active material
BESSbattery energy storage system
CAEScompressed air energy storage
EIAUS Energy Information Administration
LCOElevelised cost of electricity
LDESlong-duration energy storage
LFPlithium iron phosphate
NMCnickel manganese cobalt oxide
PSHpumped storage hydropower
STEPSStated Policies Scenario
TICtotal installed cost
UPSuninterruptible power supply

A.10Technical annex

Table A.13Technical annex
ItemAnnexContentsStatus
A.1Indicator definitionsthe global indicator set, with units and sourcesIN THIS EDITION
A.2Coupling strengthsthe twenty-cell matrix and its rationaleIN THIS EDITION
A.3Scenario specificationSCN-XT16-SUP-01 assumptions and signpostsIN THIS EDITION
A.4Capability placementsrung evidence for fifteen functionsIN THIS EDITION
A.5Model diagnosticsfirst runs and validation2027
A.6Sensitivity analysesinfluence of coupling strengths2027
A.7Cluster notescards for the major storage and battery supply chain clusters2027
A.8Review statementspass-by-pass review recordAT RELEASE

A.1 · indicator definition: installed cost of four-hour utility-scale battery storage

Construct
fully installed cost per unit of energy capacity for a utility-scale battery with four hours of storage at rated power
Unit
US dollars per kWh
Method
weighted average of reported project costs, as defined by the publisher
Source
IRENA Renewable Power Generation Costs in 20252
Uncertainty
not stated as an interval in the pages read
Known limits
turnkey price and battery cost indices measure different scopes and are not interchangeable

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: BloombergNEF (ed.), Energy Storage System Cost Survey 2025, cited only as the source of the series reported by IRENA; not opened. BloombergNEF, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 2IRENA (ed.), Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2025, 2026 (installed cost of four-hour utility-scale battery storage about USD 140 per kWh, down close to 30%; total installed cost by storage technology; solar paired with batteries). International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 37UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Hydropower Association (ed.), World Hydropower Outlook 2025 (the page loaded but the report was not read; the 2025 pumped storage figure appears only in a secondary summary). IHA, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 13Form Energy (ed.), Battery technology page (iron-air system described as able to discharge for up to 100 hours). Vendor statement, weak evidence, not independently tested. Form Energy, Somerville. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 25UNVERIFIED, not opened: EPRI (ed.), Battery Energy Storage System Failure Incident Database (the page returned no data; incident rate figures seen only in a secondary summary). Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 14Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Moss Landing Power Plant (fire of 16 January 2025; 300 MW and 1,200 MWh phase; about 1,200 residents evacuated). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 10European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries (full text; battery passport from 18 February 2027; safety of stationary battery energy storage systems, Article 12; recycled content targets). Official Journal of the European Union, Luxembourg. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 18Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Sodium-ion battery (energy density figures; producer announcements of 2025; cost claims marked as needing update). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 47UNVERIFIED, not opened: CATL (ed.), announcement of the Naxtra sodium-ion battery brand, April 2025, known only from a secondary summary; the company news page was fetched but no article was read. Contemporary Amperex Technology, Ningde. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 15Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Battery storage power station (national capacities, cost series, incident trend, as reported from cited sources). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 8IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (revised version, July 2026; concentration of refining, lithium price rise from January 2025 to April 2026, China export controls of 9 October 2025, LFP share of battery energy storage). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 22Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Hornsdale Power Reserve (150 MW and 193.5 MWh; grid service claims from cited sources). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 9Wanner, B. (IEA), Batteries and Secure Energy Transitions, presentation slides, Energy Storage Summit, London, 18 February 2025 (slides summarising the IEA special report of 2024; storage capacity needed for tripled renewables; stated policies battery additions to 2030; lithium demand measures). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 1IEA (ed.), Global Energy Review 2026, section Technology: Battery storage (108 GW of new battery storage deployed in 2025, 40% more than in 2024; about 80% utility-scale; lithium iron phosphate about 90% of deployments; China about 60% of additions; battery-based UPS additions up 30% to 45 GW). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 3US Energy Information Administration (ed.), Battery storage capacity averaged 70% growth over the last three years, Today in Energy, 7 August 2026 (43.6 GW at the end of 2025; nearly 52 GW at mid-2026; planned additions to 2028). EIA, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 5USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Lithium (world mine production 2025, end uses, prices, reserves). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Data appendix

The indicator set with its sources, the source registers, the licences of every kind of material and the formats of the edition.

9 min read0 figures8 tables15 notesNR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

B.1The indicator set

Table B.1Global baseline indicator set
IndicatorValueUnitYearStateSource
Battery storage added worldwide108GW2025Reported1
Growth over 202440%2025Reported1
Utility-scale share of additions≈80%2025Reported1
Lithium iron phosphate share of deployments≈90%2025Reported1
Lithium iron phosphate share of new installations≈94%2025Reported2
Installed cost, four-hour utility-scale battery140USD per kWh2025Reported2
Turnkey price, four-hour system111USD per kWh2025Reported2
Total installed cost, pumped storage153USD per kWh2025Reported2
US utility-scale battery capacity, end of 202543.6GW2025Reported3
US utility-scale battery capacity, mid-2026≈52GW2026Reported3
World lithium mine production290thousand tons2025Reported5
Share of mined cobalt from the Democratic Republic of the Congo73%2025Reported6
China share of natural graphite production82%2025Reported7
Storage capacity needed for tripled renewables by 2030>1,500GW2030 outlookScenario9
Battery additions 2024 to 2030, stated policies>700GW2030 outlookScenario9
Round-trip efficiency of pumped storage70 to 80%2025Reported17

B.2Global source register

The governed source set behind this edition. Each source keeps its authority, coverage, cadence and role; categories describe origin, not truth.

Domains bound by the register

  • ENE
  • INF
  • FIN
  • MIN
  • TRD
  • CLI
  • DAT
  • AIC
  • WAT
  • HLT
Table B.3Global source register
SourceCategoryCoveragePeriodCadenceRole
IEA Global Energy Review 20261intergovernmental agencyglobal2025annualdeployment
IRENA cost report2intergovernmental agencyglobal2025annualcost
EIA Today in Energy3national statistics agencyUS2026periodiccapacity
Ember review4think tankglobal2025annualcost and solar shifting
USGS lithium, cobalt, graphite567national geological surveyglobal2025annualminerals
IEA Critical Minerals Outlook8intergovernmental agencyglobal2025annualconcentration and controls
IEA batteries slides9intergovernmental agencyglobal2024one-offoutlook
EU regulation and Commission page1011EU institutionEU2023 to 2025continuouspolicy
IEA Global EV Outlook slides12intergovernmental agencyglobal2025annualcontext
Form Energy page13vendorglobal2026continuousvendor claim

B.3Regional reading, energy storage across ten clusters

Regional plates follow with the regional editions. This page gives the regional reading of storage deployment and supply in table form and ranks no region.

Table B.4Regional reading, energy storage across ten clusters
RegionPrincipal hazardsSystems most exposedBaseline evidence
North Americautility-scale build-out; the largest battery plant by energy capacity is in California; trade measures on graphitedeployment, supplyEIA3; USGS7; plant list23
South Americasolar shifting in Chile; lithium brine producersdeployment, supplyEmber4; USGS5
Europebattery regulation and passportregulationEU regulation1011
Eurasiaregional evidence (not bound)not boundregional evidence (not bound)
Middle East and North Africagrowing deployment in parts of the Middle EastdeploymentIEA1
Africacobalt mining; lithium output in Zimbabwe and MalisupplyUSGS56
South Asiaregional evidence (not bound)not boundregional evidence (not bound)
East Asiaabout 60% of 2025 additions in China; graphite and refiningdeployment, supplyIEA18; USGS7
ASEANnickel and cobalt processing; regional evidence otherwise not boundsupplyUSGS6
Oceania-Pacificnearly 8 GW added in Australia in 2025; lithium miningdeployment, supplyIRENA2; USGS5

B.4Cluster card: battery cell and graphite supply chain

  • supply chain
  • graphite
  • cells
  • single point
Systems in view
mining, refining, anode and cathode materials, cell manufacturing, storage projects
Defining events
China export controls of 9 October 20258
Couplings
MIN → ENE materials; TRD → MIN export controls
Capability evidence
processing projects outside China reported78
Gaps
cell capacity by country; recycling volumes; stocks
Agenda items
Q-02 · Q-04

China produced an estimated 82% of natural graphite in 2025, and imports of graphite anode material into the United States rose in 2025 [7].

SUPPLY

Graphite concentration

China announced export controls on lithium-ion battery supply chains on 9 October 2025; the IEA records that proposed controls on batteries were suspended until November 2026 [8].

CONTROLS

A 2025 control package

Companies are developing spherical graphite and cathode plants in several countries; none is documented at scale here [7] [8].

RESPONSE

Processing outside China

B.5How countries appear in the energy storage edition

Countries enter the storage edition through the readiness chapters of their own national editions, on one card grammar. They are read against peer distributions and thresholds, never ranked.

Table B.5How countries appear in the energy storage edition
Card fieldWhat it showsSource
WEFH+B stateeach core system against peer distribution bandsnational edition
Couplingsthe national dependency matrixnational edition
Risk objectsthe national risk portfolionational edition
Capability rungsthe national capability laddernational edition
Evidence ageoldest and newest source datesnational source register

Editions in the 2026 Baseline programme

26national

countries and unions

10regional

clusters

16global

flagship and sector

14strategic

systems reports

20frontier

technology reports

How to read a country card

  • Each system is shown against the distribution of its peers, with thresholds where they exist
  • Couplings and risk objects come from the country’s own national edition
  • Capability rungs record evidence, not a judgement of institutions
  • Evidence age is printed, so older national data are visible as such
Table B.6National Baseline Editions in the 2026 programme
WaveCountries and unionsState
W0CanadaISSUED
W1United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, European Union, SwitzerlandPLANNED
W2Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Türkiye, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, Senegal, Kenya, African Union, India, China, Republic of Korea, Indonesia, Singapore, AustraliaPLANNED

B.6Licences

Table B.7Licences of each kind of material
MaterialLicence
TextCC BY 4.0
Dataon the licence of each source; Nexus tables CC BY 4.0
FiguresNexus figures CC BY 4.0; third-party as credited
Mapsboundary source and licence printed on each plate
MetadataCC0 1.0, as Zenodo publishes it
Third-party data, figures and textThe source’s own licence, credited where it is used; never relicensed
Nexus-authored text, tables and figures: CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0). Map plates print their boundary source and licence.

B.7Formats and provenance

Table B.8This edition in every format
FormatKindStateWhat it isIdentifier
Web editionHTMLOn this siteDraft in stewardship review; every value resolves to its source.NR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Print editionPDFAt releaseA4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF, signed with the web edition at release.NR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Indicator dataCSV · JSONOn this site16 indicators with unit, year, status and source; the machine-readable copy ships with the evidence bundle at release.NR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE data release v1
FiguresSVG · PNGOn this site4 on the web edition: headline figure, figure 1.3, coupling instrument, capability ladder.FIG-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-*
SlidesPDFNot recordedNo slide deck is recorded for this edition.
Evidence briefHTML · PDFNot recordedNo evidence brief is recorded for this edition.
Dataset with DOIDataCiteAt releaseConcept and version DOI are minted at deposit; none is recorded yet.

Provenance

Edition pack
The edition’s content pack (JSON), from which the print and web editions are built
Evidence cut
DC-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-B0, closed 30 September 2026
Reproducibility
sourced values cited; analytical values reproducible from stated parameters
Self-check
14 of 23 at evidence close; a fail on any item blocks release
Review
five passes scheduled before release (in Annex C)
Publisher of record
GCRI for the Nexus Consortium
Corrections
Registry correction pathway; upheld corrections are published as notices with a new version

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1IEA (ed.), Global Energy Review 2026, section Technology: Battery storage (108 GW of new battery storage deployed in 2025, 40% more than in 2024; about 80% utility-scale; lithium iron phosphate about 90% of deployments; China about 60% of additions; battery-based UPS additions up 30% to 45 GW). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 2IRENA (ed.), Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2025, 2026 (installed cost of four-hour utility-scale battery storage about USD 140 per kWh, down close to 30%; total installed cost by storage technology; solar paired with batteries). International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 3US Energy Information Administration (ed.), Battery storage capacity averaged 70% growth over the last three years, Today in Energy, 7 August 2026 (43.6 GW at the end of 2025; nearly 52 GW at mid-2026; planned additions to 2028). EIA, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 5USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Lithium (world mine production 2025, end uses, prices, reserves). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 6USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Cobalt (Democratic Republic of the Congo share, export quotas 2026 and 2027, import reliance). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 7USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Graphite (Natural) (China share of production, anode material imports, preliminary duties). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 9Wanner, B. (IEA), Batteries and Secure Energy Transitions, presentation slides, Energy Storage Summit, London, 18 February 2025 (slides summarising the IEA special report of 2024; storage capacity needed for tripled renewables; stated policies battery additions to 2030; lithium demand measures). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 17Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Pumped-storage hydroelectricity (round-trip efficiency of 70 to 80%; world capacity about 200 GW in 2025 attributed to the hydropower association). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 4Ember (ed.), Global Electricity Review 2026, 21 April 2026 (battery costs down 45% in 2025 after 20% in 2024; deployment up 46% to an estimated 250 GWh; 14% of new solar generation shifted). Ember, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 8IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (revised version, July 2026; concentration of refining, lithium price rise from January 2025 to April 2026, China export controls of 9 October 2025, LFP share of battery energy storage). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 10European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries (full text; battery passport from 18 February 2027; safety of stationary battery energy storage systems, Article 12; recycled content targets). Official Journal of the European Union, Luxembourg. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 11European Commission (ed.), Batteries (policy page; Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 in force 17 August 2023, applies from 18 February 2024; Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/606 of 4 July 2025 on recycling efficiency). Directorate-General for Environment, Brussels. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 12IEA (ed.), Global EV Outlook 2026, launch webinar slides, 20 May 2026 (electric cars 25% of sales in 2025, 28% forecast for 2026; battery pack price declines in China). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 13Form Energy (ed.), Battery technology page (iron-air system described as able to discharge for up to 100 hours). Vendor statement, weak evidence, not independently tested. Form Energy, Somerville. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 23Wikipedia contributors (eds.), List of energy storage power plants (largest battery plants by energy capacity). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

References and record

Every source the edition rests on, the publication record, the corrections log and the open record.

14 min read0 figures1 table0 notesNR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

C.148 sources

NR-CIT-1, editor first. A DOI is linked where the source has one; Nexus records carry a UNI once the catalogue allocates it (NS-1).

  1. 1IEA (ed.), Global Energy Review 2026, section Technology: Battery storage (108 GW of new battery storage deployed in 2025, 40% more than in 2024; about 80% utility-scale; lithium iron phosphate about 90% of deployments; China about 60% of additions; battery-based UPS additions up 30% to 45 GW). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  2. 2IRENA (ed.), Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2025, 2026 (installed cost of four-hour utility-scale battery storage about USD 140 per kWh, down close to 30%; total installed cost by storage technology; solar paired with batteries). International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  3. 3US Energy Information Administration (ed.), Battery storage capacity averaged 70% growth over the last three years, Today in Energy, 7 August 2026 (43.6 GW at the end of 2025; nearly 52 GW at mid-2026; planned additions to 2028). EIA, Washington. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6
  4. 4Ember (ed.), Global Electricity Review 2026, 21 April 2026 (battery costs down 45% in 2025 after 20% in 2024; deployment up 46% to an estimated 250 GWh; 14% of new solar generation shifted). Ember, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  5. 5USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Lithium (world mine production 2025, end uses, prices, reserves). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  6. 6USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Cobalt (Democratic Republic of the Congo share, export quotas 2026 and 2027, import reliance). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  7. 7USGS (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Graphite (Natural) (China share of production, anode material imports, preliminary duties). US Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  8. 8IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (revised version, July 2026; concentration of refining, lithium price rise from January 2025 to April 2026, China export controls of 9 October 2025, LFP share of battery energy storage). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 5, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  9. 9Wanner, B. (IEA), Batteries and Secure Energy Transitions, presentation slides, Energy Storage Summit, London, 18 February 2025 (slides summarising the IEA special report of 2024; storage capacity needed for tripled renewables; stated policies battery additions to 2030; lithium demand measures). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6, chapter 8
  10. 10European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries (full text; battery passport from 18 February 2027; safety of stationary battery energy storage systems, Article 12; recycled content targets). Official Journal of the European Union, Luxembourg. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  11. 11European Commission (ed.), Batteries (policy page; Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 in force 17 August 2023, applies from 18 February 2024; Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/606 of 4 July 2025 on recycling efficiency). Directorate-General for Environment, Brussels. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  12. 12IEA (ed.), Global EV Outlook 2026, launch webinar slides, 20 May 2026 (electric cars 25% of sales in 2025, 28% forecast for 2026; battery pack price declines in China). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  13. 13Form Energy (ed.), Battery technology page (iron-air system described as able to discharge for up to 100 hours). Vendor statement, weak evidence, not independently tested. Form Energy, Somerville. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  14. 14Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Moss Landing Power Plant (fire of 16 January 2025; 300 MW and 1,200 MWh phase; about 1,200 residents evacuated). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  15. 15Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Battery storage power station (national capacities, cost series, incident trend, as reported from cited sources). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.
  16. 16Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Grid energy storage (pumped storage and battery capacity in 2023 from an IEA dataset). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 8
  17. 17Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Pumped-storage hydroelectricity (round-trip efficiency of 70 to 80%; world capacity about 200 GW in 2025 attributed to the hydropower association). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 8
  18. 18Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Sodium-ion battery (energy density figures; producer announcements of 2025; cost claims marked as needing update). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 8
  19. 19Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Lithium iron phosphate battery (energy density, cycle life, market share reports). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 8
  20. 20Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Flow battery (vanadium system of 100 MW and 400 MWh in Dalian, 2022). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 8
  21. 21Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Compressed-air energy storage (Huntorf, McIntosh and Zhangjiakou plants). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 8
  22. 22Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Hornsdale Power Reserve (150 MW and 193.5 MWh; grid service claims from cited sources). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.
  23. 23Wikipedia contributors (eds.), List of energy storage power plants (largest battery plants by energy capacity). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.
  24. 24Wikipedia contributors (eds.), Cobalt (Democratic Republic of the Congo production share quoted at different values from cited sources). Secondary summary, weak evidence. Wikimedia Foundation, San Francisco. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  25. 25UNVERIFIED, not opened: EPRI (ed.), Battery Energy Storage System Failure Incident Database (the page returned no data; incident rate figures seen only in a secondary summary). Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  26. 26UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Department of Energy (ed.), Long Duration Storage Shot, launched 2021, cited from memory; the page address returned not found. US Department of Energy, Washington. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  27. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (ed.), Storage Futures Study, 2021, cited from memory; the host was not reachable. NREL, Golden. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  28. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: BloombergNEF (ed.), Energy Storage System Cost Survey 2025, cited only as the source of the series reported by IRENA; not opened. BloombergNEF, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  29. 29UNVERIFIED, not opened: Lazard (ed.), Levelized Cost of Energy Plus, 2025 edition, cited from memory. Lazard, New York. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  30. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: UL Standards and Engagement (ed.), UL 9540, Energy Storage Systems and Equipment, third edition 2023, cited from memory; the catalogue page showed no document text. UL, Northbrook. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  31. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: UL Standards and Engagement (ed.), UL 9540A, Test Method for Evaluating Thermal Runaway Fire Propagation in Battery Energy Storage Systems, cited from memory. UL, Northbrook. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  32. 32UNVERIFIED, not opened: National Fire Protection Association (ed.), NFPA 855, Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems, 2023 edition, cited from memory; the page showed only the title. NFPA, Quincy. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  33. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Electrotechnical Commission (ed.), IEC 62619:2022, Safety requirements for secondary lithium cells and batteries for use in industrial applications, cited from memory. IEC, Geneva. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  34. 34UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Electrotechnical Commission (ed.), IEC 63056:2020, Safety requirements for secondary lithium cells and batteries for use in electrical energy storage systems, cited from memory. IEC, Geneva. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  35. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: United Nations (ed.), Manual of Tests and Criteria, section 38.3, lithium metal and lithium ion batteries, cited from memory; the page returned an access error. United Nations, Geneva. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  36. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Electrotechnical Commission (ed.), IEC 62933-5-2, Electrical energy storage systems, safety requirements for grid-integrated systems, electrochemical-based systems, cited from memory. IEC, Geneva. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  37. 37UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Hydropower Association (ed.), World Hydropower Outlook 2025 (the page loaded but the report was not read; the 2025 pumped storage figure appears only in a secondary summary). IHA, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  38. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: Dunn, B., Kamath, H. and Tarascon, J.-M., Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices, Science 334, 928 to 935, 2011, cited from memory. Observation year 2011. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6
  39. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Schmidt, O. et al., Projecting the future levelized cost of electricity storage technologies, Joule 3, 81 to 100, 2019, cited from memory. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6
  40. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: Albertus, P., Manser, J.S. and Litzelman, S., Long-duration electricity storage applications, economics, and technologies, Joule 4, 21 to 32, 2020, cited from memory. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6
  41. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: Sepulveda, N.A. et al., Design space for long-duration energy storage in decarbonised power systems, Nature Energy 6, 506 to 516, 2021, cited from memory. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  42. 42UNVERIFIED, not opened: Hunter, C.A. et al., Techno-economic analysis of long-duration energy storage and flexible power generation technologies to support high-variable renewable energy grids, Joule 5, 2077 to 2101, 2021, cited from memory. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  43. 43UNVERIFIED, not opened: Armand, M. and Tarascon, J.-M., Building better batteries, Nature 451, 652 to 657, 2008, cited from memory. Observation year 2008. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  44. 44UNVERIFIED, not opened: Goodenough, J.B. and Park, K.-S., The Li-ion rechargeable battery: a perspective, Journal of the American Chemical Society 135, 1167 to 1176, 2013, cited from memory. Observation year 2013. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  45. 45UNVERIFIED, not opened: Larcher, D. and Tarascon, J.-M., Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage, Nature Chemistry 7, 19 to 29, 2015, cited from memory. Observation year 2015. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  46. 46UNVERIFIED, not opened: Feng, X. et al., Thermal runaway mechanism of lithium ion battery for electric vehicles: a review, Energy Storage Materials 10, 246 to 267, 2018, cited from memory. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  47. 47UNVERIFIED, not opened: CATL (ed.), announcement of the Naxtra sodium-ion battery brand, April 2025, known only from a secondary summary; the company news page was fetched but no article was read. Contemporary Amperex Technology, Ningde. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  48. 48UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (ed.), Order No. 841, Electric Storage Participation in Markets Operated by Regional Transmission Organizations and Independent System Operators, February 2018, cited from memory. FERC, Washington. Observation year 2018. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6

C.2Publication record

Publication

Title
Exponential Technology Report 2026: Advanced Energy Storage, Baseline Edition
Series
Reports · Exponential Technology Series XT-16
Edition
Baseline Edition 2026 · inaugural annual
Version
v1.0.0 · draft for stewardship review
Publication ID
NR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Evidence close
30 September 2026
Publication date
October 2026
DOI
concept and version DOI at deposit

Publisher

Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), for the Nexus Consortium
Place
Toronto
Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor
Stewards
GCRI · technical truth · GRF · public meaning · GRA · capital meaning
Licence
text CC BY 4.0; data on the terms of each source
Copyright
© 2026 GCRI · Nexus Consortium
Language
English (en-GB) source edition
Correspondence
Registry correction pathway · editorial office

Colophon

Format
A4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF
Typefaces
Space Grotesk (display) · Geist (text) · IBM Plex Sans Italic (standfirsts) · IBM Plex Mono (data)
Design standard
Reports Foundational Edition, Volume I, Part VII
Accessibility
tagged PDF and HTML targets; text alternatives for every figure
Production
Reports editorial team, GCRI

Release path for this version

Table C.1Release path for this version
StepWhat happensWhen
Drafteditorial self-check complete at evidence closeOctober 2026
Steward reviewfive passes on the exact draft (keys T · M · F · N)Q4 2026
Approvalpublication authority approves the exact digestbefore release
Depositconcept and version DOI minted; registry pointer setat release
Successionthe 2027 energy storage edition reports changes against this baseline2027
Current version
v1.0.0 draft, stewardship review
Previous edition
none, first edition of the series
Next edition
NR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2027-v1.0.0
Latest version
resolve the concept DOI or the registry record
Correction route
Registry correction pathway
Notice types
erratum · addendum · supersession · withdrawal

C.3Corrections log

0correction notices. No edition has been released yet, so none can be corrected; the log below lists each edition’s current version.

EditionVersionDateStateChangeNotice
XT-16NR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0October 2026DraftBaseline Edition 2026, inaugural annual edition,None

Notice types: erratum, addendum, supersession, withdrawal. A correction is a new version with a published notice; the earlier version stays resolvable, and no edition is ever edited in silence.

C.4Open record

This edition’s open record

Publication ID
NR-XTECH-STORAGE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Desk identifier and series alias
NR-XTC-XT-16-2026-BL
Collection
None
DOI
Concept and version DOI at deposit, on Zenodo with DataCite metadata
Versions
Each correction is a new version (isNewVersionOf); the concept DOI resolves to the latest
Bundle
RO-Crate 1.2 with CITATION.cff, CodeMeta and PROV-O provenance; a signed manifest
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0) for original material; metadata CC0 1.0

Credit and identity

ORCID
Your iD in the deposit and the contribution record; DataCite can then add the work to your ORCID record
ROR
Your organisation by its ROR identifier, never by a typed name alone
CRediT
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualisation, Writing, review and editing
Account
None needed to contribute; never a password

Find and follow

Search the open indexes for Advanced Energy Storage; software is cited by its SWHID from Software Heritage, and a quantified scenario run is preregistered on OSF before it is run. Annotation is your choice: Hypothesis opens this page in its own viewer.

Mirrors and harvest

The DOI is canonical. At release each signed bundle is also given an IPFS content identifier and a bloxberg anchor as mirrors; both are listed in the record once they exist. Zenodo exposes every record over OAI-PMH, and reviews and endorsements can arrive through COAR Notify where the repository supports it.

InvenioRDM metadata for a contribution on Advanced Energy Storage, prefilled from this page
{
  "metadata": {
    "resource_type": {
      "id": "dataset"
    },
    "title": "Evidence on Advanced Energy Storage for Nexus Reports",
    "publication_date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
    "creators": [
      {
        "person_or_org": {
          "type": "personal",
          "family_name": "Your family name",
          "given_name": "Your given name",
          "identifiers": [
            {
              "scheme": "orcid",
              "identifier": "0000-0000-0000-0000"
            }
          ]
        },
        "affiliations": [
          {
            "id": "ROR identifier of your organisation"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "description": "What it is, where its record is kept and how it bears on Exponential Technology Report 2026: Advanced Energy Storage.",
    "rights": [
      {
        "id": "cc-by-4.0"
      }
    ],
    "subjects": [
      {
        "subject": "Nexus Reports"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Advanced Energy Storage"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Exponential Technology Report · XT-16"
      }
    ],
    "related_identifiers": [
      {
        "identifier": "https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/editions/xt-16/",
        "scheme": "url",
        "relation_type": {
          "id": "issupplementto"
        },
        "resource_type": {
          "id": "publication-report"
        }
      }
    ],
    "version": "1.0.0"
  },
  "custom_fields": {},
  "access": {
    "record": "public",
    "files": "public"
  },
  "files": {
    "enabled": true
  },
  "parent": {
    "communities": {
      "default": "nexusreports"
    }
  }
}

C.5Where this edition sits among the six pillars

Foundry seals the evidence and Universe tests it; Reports publishes it; Standards takes its corrections and Academy teaches from it.

  1. F03 Sealed observations and indicator series Foundry Sealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
  2. F04 After-action and scenario findings for Universe After-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
  3. F05 National Portfolio movement for chapter Foundry National Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
  4. Applied in editions Standards Nexus Standards: applied in editions.
  5. XT-16 edition Reports Advanced Energy Storage 2026, published in every format with its sources, citation and corrections.
  6. F06 Method and correction findings as change Standards Method and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
  7. F12 Q4 synthesis informs the next-year Universe Q4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
  8. Taught in the open Academy Risk Academy: taught in the open.

What Foundry and Universe hand to this edition, and what it hands to Standards, Universe and Academy. From the programme spine; XT-16 is a drafted Baseline Edition, so these handoffs run from its first operational quarter.

HandoffBetweenWhat crosses, and when
F03Foundry to ReportsSealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
F04Universe to ReportsAfter-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
F05Foundry to ReportsNational Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
RingNexus Standards to ReportsNexus Standards: applied in editions.
F06Reports to Nexus StandardsMethod and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
F12Reports to UniverseQ4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
RingReports to Risk AcademyRisk Academy: taught in the open.
ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Advanced Energy Storage.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the GCRI Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskExponential Technology

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

Sector signature

The sectors behind Advanced Energy Storage.

A reading aid: the sectors the findings run through and how strongly they depend on each other.

Select corners · hover lines6 / 15 relations

Signature

Energy and its partners

Energy gives power for transport and telecoms to infrastructure (0.8), pumping and treatment to water (0.5) and fertiliser, machinery and cold chains to food (0.5).

W · E · I · F · H · B

Sectors
4 of 6
Relations
6 of 15
Coupling
0.46 share of total

Strongest relations in play

  • Energy → Infrastructure · power for transport and telecoms0.8
  • Water → Energy · cooling water and hydropower0.6
  • Water → Food · irrigation0.8
  • Infrastructure → Water · pipes, dams and treatment works0.6
Teaching values for a typical city-region, not measurements for any place. Coupling is the summed strength of the relations in play, as a share of all fifteen.
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.