Skip to content

GCRI · Nexus Ecosystem

Methods and standards

Countries can compare and combine their work only if they share methods. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) stewards the programme’s conventions: how evidence is labelled, how models are documented, how data moves between systems and how capacity is measured. They are working conventions. They are not certification, accreditation or conformity with any external standard. Part of Nexus ecosystem.

02Evidence methodology

Every result carries one of nine labels.

LabelMeaning
ObservedMeasured directly
Published statisticsReported by a competent authority; a source type, not an endorsement
Institution-reportedReported by a participating institution
EstimatedDerived from partial data with a stated method
ModelledProduced by a documented model
ForecastA model projection for a future period
ScenarioA plausible what-if, not a prediction
Expert judgementStructured opinion with its basis
UnknownNot known; never shown as zero
03The NS series

The proposed Nexus Standards, and what each would govern.

StandardSubjectWhat it would do for a reader
NS-0Constitution and principlesSets what a Nexus Standard is for and what it must never claim
NS-1 and NS-2The Unique Nexus Identifier (UNI), the artefact catalogue and citation formatLets any report, dataset or model be named and cited without ambiguity
NS-3 and NS-3bThe Global Risks Index (NXS-GRX) record identifiers; dataset and product metadata (STAC, DCAT, PROV-O)Lets a figure in a report be traced to the record and dataset it came from
NS-4 and NS-5Document template; figures, maps and visualisationsKeeps documents and figures self-describing
NS-9Contextual identifiers for deployments and programme instancesDistinguishes a national instance from the global programme
NS-10 and NS-11Machine-readable policies and clauses; verification and monitoringRecords obligations and the evidence that they were met
NS-12Software, model and AI/ML artefactsRequires bills of materials, model cards and dataset sheets
NS-13 and NS-14Standards development process; crosswalks to external standardsOpens proposals to debate, and maps each standard to ISO, OGC, W3C and other references

All are proposals published at nexustandards.com, with their status shown on each page. A UNI identifies and resolves a record; it never confers a status on the thing it names. Crosswalks under NS-14 state where a Nexus Standard relates to an external one, and claim no conformity.

04Taking part

How a specialist can shape a standard.

Under the proposed NS-13 process, anyone can open a proposal, comment on a draft or document a conflict with an external standard; decisions are recorded with their reasons. Standards bodies and professional societies can propose a crosswalk. The standards feed every series of Reports, starting with the Methods and Technical series.

05Interoperability

Conventions that let work move between countries.

Methods

Canonical method pages

Each of the fifty-four methods has one canonical page in the STEM Commons.

Models

Model and data cards

Data, model and software cards record purpose, inputs, validation, limits and version.

Exchange

Source interfaces

Versioned source agreements, schema mappings and refresh and correction protocols with source agencies.

06No implied certification

What these conventions are not.

Conventions make work comparable. They do not tell anyone that a product, person or institution meets a requirement.

  • Test completion is never presented as accredited certification.
  • External standards are named as references where relevant, never as claims of alignment or conformity.
  • GCRI does not certify, license or approve products, people or institutions.
  • A methods profile is reusable where licensed; it confers no status on those who use it.
07Collaborate

Work with standards bodies and societies.

Standards bodies, metrology organisations and professional societies can propose a methods or interoperability collaboration. The first outcome is a scoped profile, an interoperability protocol and reusable artefacts where licensed. Write to the research collaboration form. See Methods and technical papers and the evidence and data standards of The Global Risks Alliance (GRA).

09Questions

Questions and answers.

Can my organisation claim it follows Nexus standards?
You may describe the methods you use. Please do not present them as a certification or an endorsement by GCRI.
Does GCRI align with ISO or other standards?
External standards are cited as references where useful. No alignment or conformity is claimed without an assessment record.
Why not use a single risk index?
A single score hides the dependencies, uncertainty and evidence types that decision-makers need to see. The methods compare systems domain by domain and keep every kind of evidence labelled.
How are methods changed?
Through review on the canonical method page; each change creates a new version with its reasons.
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Bring a method, a dataset or a question.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.