Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

Small volumes, large dependence

Part I describes systems and their couplings. It ranks no country or operator and assesses no authority.

4 min read2 figures1 table5 notesNR-STRATEGIC-MINERALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. ·Executive summary
  3. 1Small volumes, large dependence
    1. 1.1 The questions this part answers
    2. 1.2 The argument
    3. 1.3 Twenty couplings between five systems
  4. 2Key findings
  5. 3Systems and sectors at baseline
  6. 4Risks and capability
  7. 5Export-control expansion that overlaps a cobalt quota squeeze
  8. 6Readings from the other desks
  9. 7The 2027 agenda
  10. 8Systems in depth
  11. AMethodology
  12. BData appendix
  13. CReferences and record
  14. ·Complete edition, for print

1.1The questions this part answers

Key questions

  • Where is critical minerals risk concentrated?
  • Which couplings carry critical minerals shocks into other systems?
  • Which critical minerals capabilities hold under compound stress?
  • What must 2027 evidence measure first?

In this part

  • Narrative
  • Headline finding
  • Lead figure
  • Five mechanism chapters
  • Twelve-domain reading
  • Sector screens
  • Dependency matrix
  • Risk objects
  • Capability ladder
  • Scenario
  • Three lenses
  • Portfolio

1.2The argument

Critical minerals are usually reported by commodity: lithium, cobalt, graphite, rare earths. The 2025 and 2026 evidence reads them as one dependent network. A few countries refine most of the supply, trade controls and quotas can move prices within months, and small volumes underpin very large downstream output21.

The causes repeat. China placed licence controls on seven heavy rare earths in April 20255. The DRC capped cobalt exports from October 20259. Zimbabwe and Mozambique limited raw exports of lithium and graphite2. Prices followed: cobalt rose by around 130% and strategic minor minerals more than doubled2.

Diversification is slow. Refining and magnet capacity lag mining outside the dominant supplier, and refining projects there face capital costs 20% to over 150% higher2. In rare earths, diversified refining capacity equals about two thirds of expected mined supply by 2035, but planned magnet capacity only one third2.

The edition therefore asks the same four questions of every event: what was the common cause, how did it spread, what was shared, and what threshold was crossed. It attributes no motive and places no producer in a league table.

Figure 1.1How concentrated is the supply of key minerals? Share of world output, 2025, %

For each mineral one country holds most of the output. The shares come from different measures, so the bars compare reach, not risk, and refining shares are higher still for several minerals12.

ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
China, primary low-purity gallium99
China, natural graphite82
DRC, mined cobalt73
China, rare earth mine output69

Source: as cited in the note to this figure. Year 2025.

Figure ID FIG-STRATEGIC-MINERALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-01-003

99%

China, primary low-purity gallium1

82%

China, natural graphite1

73%

DRC, mined cobalt1

≈69%

China, rare earth mine output1

1.3Twenty couplings between five systems

The critical minerals-centred matrix types the twenty couplings between the five core systems, read for their critical minerals content. Strengths are Nexus estimates (ESTIMATED) from the cited evidence and analogue events; they set the graph that 2027 evidence will test.

Figure 1.2Couplings between the five systems

Each line is one coupling from one system to another, drawn by the strength the edition assigns. Strengths are Nexus estimates from the cited evidence and analogue events.

  • Strong
  • Moderate
  • Weak

Source: this edition’s coupling matrix (Table 1.1); status Estimated.

Table 1.1Coupling matrix: from the row system to the column system
From, toWATENEFOOHLTBIO
WAT Water·WEAK
hydro · cooling
WEAK
irrigation
WEAK
safe supply
MODERATE
mine water · tailings
ENE EnergyMODERATE
pumping · treatment · acid
·MODERATE
sulphur · acid · fertiliser
WEAK
power
MODERATE
mining footprint
FOO FoodWEAK
withdrawals
WEAK
bioenergy
·WEAK
nutrition
WEAK
land conversion
HLT HealthWEAK
workforce
WEAK
workforce
WEAK
labour
·WEAK
residues
BIO BiodiversityWEAK
catchments
WEAK
hydrology
WEAK
pollination
WEAK
zoonoses
·
Strength: strong, moderate or weak; a Nexus estimate (status Estimated) from cited evidence and analogue events. The scale is defined in Annex A.

Transmission paths

  1. 01

    TRD → MIN → FIN

    A licence on heavy rare earths halts magnet supply and cuts vehicle output.

    Reported 2025 controls25

  2. 02

    MIN → FIN

    A producer quota lifts cobalt prices by around 130%.

    Reported 2025 to 202629

  3. 03

    INF → MIN → DAT

    Weak smelter fees threaten by-product recovery of gallium and germanium.

    Reported 2026 fees2

  4. 04

    ENE → MIN → FOO

    A Gulf shutdown curbs sulphur and acid used in processing and fertiliser.

    Reported 20262

  5. 05

    MIN → BIO

    Mine expansion triggers offsite deforestation.

    Reported Africa 2001 to 202027

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 2IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (revised version, July 2026). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 1U.S. Geological Survey (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (version 1.3, May 2026; manuscript dated 6 February 2026). U.S. Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 5Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman (eds.), China Suspends Export Controls on Certain Critical Minerals and Related Items (client alert; announcements 55 to 58, 61 and 62 suspended from 7 November 2025 to 10 November 2026; Article 2 of Announcement 46 suspended to 27 November 2026; Announcement 18 of 4 April 2025 remains in force). Pillsbury, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 9Fastmarkets (ed.), Cobalt export quotas: DRC sets limits to rebalance global supply (ARECOMS announcement of 21 September 2025; 18,125 tonnes to the end of 2025; 87,000 tonnes base plus a 9,600 tonne strategic quota for 2026; effective 16 October 2025). Fastmarkets, London. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 27Morton, O., Bousfield, C.G., Dégny Valé, P. et al., Mining triggers extensive additional deforestation in sub-Saharan Africa, Nature, 2026 (16,627 mines, 2001 to 2020). Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Cite this chapter

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Chapter 1: Small volumes, large dependence. In Strategic Systems Report 2026: Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-STRATEGIC-MINERALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskStrategic Systems

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.