Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

Systems and sectors at baseline

4 min read0 figures2 tables9 notesNR-STRATEGIC-MINERALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. ·Executive summary
  3. 1Small volumes, large dependence
  4. 2Key findings
  5. 3Systems and sectors at baseline
    1. 3.1 Where each system stood at evidence close
    2. 3.2 Domain posture
    3. 3.3 Sector screens
  6. 4Risks and capability
  7. 5Export-control expansion that overlaps a cobalt quota squeeze
  8. 6Readings from the other desks
  9. 7The 2027 agenda
  10. 8Systems in depth
  11. AMethodology
  12. BData appendix
  13. CReferences and record
  14. ·Complete edition, for print

3.1Where each system stood at evidence close

MIN · Refining

Top refiner average share, excluding rare earths

72%

up from 70% in 2023.

Reported2025IEA2

TRD · Controls

Chinese tariff codes under export control, against 2023

3x

status of the October 2025 expansion at the close is not bound.

Reported2025IEA2

MIN · Cobalt

DRC export cap a year, 2026 and 2027

96,600tonnes

less than half of 2024 production.

Reported2025USGS1 · IEA2

FIN · Value at risk

Downstream output outside China at risk, rare earths

6.5USD trillion

about 7% of combined GDP; modelled.

Reported2026IEA2

MIN · Rare earths

World mine output

390,000tonnes

China 270,000 tonnes.

Reported2025USGS1

SYS · Cross-system

Public finance commitments, advanced economies

65USD billion

over four times 2023; disbursement lags.

Reported2025IEA2

3.2Domain posture

Each of the twelve coupled domains is read through critical minerals, in words, not scored. The coupling column names the dependency that carries critical minerals risk into each domain.

Table 3.1Each domain read in words, not scored
DomainPosture at baselineCouplingStatus
WATSulphuric acid and water underpin mineral processing; evidence not consolidated here.WAT → MINInferred EQL 2
ENEThe 2026 Gulf conflict curtailed aluminium and sulphur supply; energy minerals drive demand.ENE ↔ MINReported EQL 3
FOOSulphuric acid links mineral processing and fertiliser; China curbed acid exports in May 2026.MIN ↔ FOOReported EQL 3
HLTImaging and device minerals such as gadolinium; not consolidated here.MIN → HLTInferred EQL 2
BIOMining triggered 187,000 hectares of direct deforestation and about 34 offsite hectares per direct hectare in Africa27.MIN → BIOReported EQL 4
CLILithium demand rose by nearly 30% in 2024, led by vehicles and storage3.CLI → MINReported EQL 3
INFSmelters are strategic midstream infrastructure; the benchmark copper fee was USD 0 a tonne in 2026.INF ↔ MINReported EQL 3
FINInvestment fell 9% in 2025; public finance commitments reached about USD 65 billion.FIN → MINReported EQL 3
DATGallium and germanium underpin chips and optics; data-centre servers are a growing exposure.MIN → DATReported EQL 3
AICSemiconductors, robotics and AI raise demand for gallium, germanium and indium.AIC → MINInferred EQL 2
MINThe core system: a 72% top-refiner average and 270,000 tonnes of Chinese rare earth output.the core systemReported EQL 4
TRDChinese tariff codes under export control tripled since 2023; heavy rare earth licences placed in April 2025.TRD ↔ MINReported EQL 4

3.3Sector screens

All sixteen sectors are screened for their dependence on critical minerals, on the same grammar as every national edition. The evidence column describes coverage of the baseline evidence, not the performance of the sector.

Table 3.2Sectors: baseline evidence and the exposure to watch
CodeSectorBaseline evidenceExposure to watchEvidence coverage
GS-00Cross-systemone mineral shock reaches magnets, batteries and chips2control lapse with cobalt quotaPARTIAL
GS-01Waterwater and acid in processingacid supply shockTHIN
GS-02Energylithium, graphite and copper demand from storage and grids2storage and grid build-outGOOD
GS-03Food and agrifoodacid and sulphur link to fertiliser2acid export curbsTHIN
GS-04Healthimaging and device mineralsspecialty material gapsTHIN
GS-05Finance and economyUSD 6.5 trillion of downstream output at risk in one case2price shockPARTIAL
GS-06Developmentproducer revenue and export policies2export restrictionsPARTIAL
GS-07Climatedemand for clean-energy minerals3demand outpacing supplyPARTIAL
GS-08DisasterGulf conflict curtailed aluminium and sulphur2regional shutdownTHIN
GS-09Infrastructureprojected copper supply gap of 25% in 20352copper shortfallGOOD
GS-10Citiesurban demand for batteries and cablesthin evidence hereTHIN
GS-11Biodiversitymining deforestation in Africa27mine expansionPARTIAL
GS-12Earth observationthe Earth MRI programme remaps US resources1data accessTHIN
GS-13Cyber and digitalchips and optics depend on gallium and germanium1single-supplier gapsPARTIAL
GS-14Policystockpiles, price floors and benchmarks21119implementation gapsGOOD
GS-15Sciencecascade and trade-network models published232425data at operating scalePARTIAL

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 2IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026 (revised version, July 2026). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 1U.S. Geological Survey (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026 (version 1.3, May 2026; manuscript dated 6 February 2026). U.S. Geological Survey, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 27Morton, O., Bousfield, C.G., Dégny Valé, P. et al., Mining triggers extensive additional deforestation in sub-Saharan Africa, Nature, 2026 (16,627 mines, 2001 to 2020). Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 3IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025. International Energy Agency, Paris, 2025. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 11European Commission, Critical Raw Materials Act (web page; 2030 benchmarks of 10% extraction, 40% processing, 25% recycling and a 65% single third-country cap, as shares of annual EU consumption). Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Brussels. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 19G7, Roadmap to Promote Standards-based Markets for Critical Minerals, 31 October 2025 (read on the Natural Resources Canada news page). Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 23Ouyang, X., Liu, L., Liu, Q. et al., Systemic risks and cascading dynamics in the global cobalt supply chain, Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 2026 (trade-linked flows, 1998 to 2019). Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 24Liu, X., Huang, H., An, F. et al., Resilience assessment of lithium ion battery supply chains under critical mineral shortages, iScience, 2026 (multi-tier network of nine battery manufacturers). Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 25Han, Y., Wang, P., Liao, Z. et al., Exploring the divergence of rare earth trade networks with a global simulation model, iScience, 2025. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Cite this chapter

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Chapter 3: Systems and sectors at baseline. In Strategic Systems Report 2026: Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-STRATEGIC-MINERALS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskStrategic Systems

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.