ReportsGCRICharters
Operations · version 0.1.0

Peer review policy

How submissions are reviewed, how long each step takes and how decisions and appeals work.

Peer review policyCharters
  1. Version0.1.0
  2. StatusDraft pending owner and counsel review
  3. EffectiveOn adoption by the owner through nexus-governance
  4. Applies toall on all networks
  5. Text hash (sha256)905bbdd8d6ac1799…
  6. JurisdictionProposal: laws of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein; for counsel review

Reports · the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI Canada), publisher of record

01Status

Draft. Not in force.

This document is a draft. It is not legal advice and it is not in force. It becomes required only when the owner adopts it by a recorded decision in nexus-governance. Until then nothing here blocks anyone’s work.

02Operations

Model

Open, staged review in five passes: evidence, method, stewardship, copy and claims, release. Articles and data get at least two reviewers. Essays get one reviewer plus the editor. Reviewers are not authors, colleagues or coauthors of the authors.

03Operations

Timelines

StepTime
Acknowledge a submission2 days
Screen10 days (5 for corrections)
Reviewer accepts14 days
Review reports28 days
Decision14 days

Late steps show on the public status page.

04Operations

Conflicts

Reviewers declare conflicts before they read the abstract. Editors and board members step out of any submission they have a conflict with. Authors declare funding and relationships. A reviewer cannot be the author, from the same institution, a coauthor, the desk editor or anyone with a declared conflict.

05Operations

Confidentiality

Manuscripts are confidential until the open review log is published. Reviewers do not upload manuscripts to AI tools and do not share them.

06Operations

Open review log

Each pass, result and date is public with the version reviewed. Reviewers choose whether to sign. Notes become public after the decision. Authors see every report.

07Operations

Decisions

The editorial board decides in nexus-governance. Options: accept, revise, decline. Decisions are public with reasons. Authors, reviewers and the screening editor do not vote on their own submission.

08Operations

Appeals

Appeal within 30 days of a decline on one of three grounds: process error, undeclared conflict, or misread evidence. A panel of three council members with no earlier involvement decides within 30 days.

09Operations

Before any action

Reviewers need the Reviewer Charter and the Conflict-of-Interest declaration current before they accept. Editors need the Editor Charter, the declaration and the independence statement before they record a decision.

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.