Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

  • Reports
  • Baseline Edition 2026
  • Complete edition

Exponential Technology Report 2026: Robotics and Autonomous Systems

Edition home

Choose A4 or Letter in the print dialog; running heads and page numbers are added in print. This is a review copy: the signed PDF with its DOI is issued at release.

ReportsXT-03

Exponential Technology

Robotics and Autonomous Systems 2026

Baseline Edition 2026NR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINEGCRI for the Nexus Consortium

Imprint

Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor, the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI)
Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) for the Nexus Consortium, Toronto
Report number
NR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE
Evidence close
30 September 2026, cut DC-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Status
Draft under stewardship review; not yet released
DOI and UNI
Issued at deposit
Licence
CC BY 4.0 for Nexus-authored text, tables and figures; third-party material keeps its own licence
Cite as
Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Exponential Technology Report 2026: Robotics and Autonomous Systems (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI). https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/editions/xt-03/

Contents

  1. ·

    Executive summary

  2. 1

    Chapter 1. Robots are infrastructure and a test of institutions

  3. 2

    Chapter 2. Key findings

  4. 3

    Chapter 3. Systems and sectors at baseline

  5. 4

    Chapter 4. Risks and capability

  6. 5

    Chapter 5. Humanoid pilots meet a missing safety standard

  7. 6

    Chapter 6. Readings from the other desks

  8. 7

    Chapter 7. The 2027 agenda

  9. 8

    Chapter 8. Systems in depth

  10. A

    Annex A. Methodology

  11. B

    Annex B. Data appendix

  12. C

    Annex C. References and record

Executive summary

The edition on a few pages: the abstract, the key messages, the headline finding and what each steward reads in it.

6 min read1 figure0 tables13 notesNR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

S.1Abstract

Robots matter to the Nexus programme in two ways. They are a growing physical infrastructure of industrial arms, warehouse fleets, driverless vehicles and, newly, humanoid platforms. They are also a test of whether safety rules, labour institutions and supply chains can keep pace with machines that act in the physical world. The fleet evidence is strong. The International Federation of Robotics reports more than 600,000 industrial robots installed in 2025, up 11%, and an operational stock of 5 million1. China accounted for 354,000 of the installations, 59% of the world total1. Learned control is moving fast in research: one pooled dataset combines data from 22 robot types across 21 institutions8, and a published generalist policy was trained on 800,000 trajectories from it11. Humanoid volumes are small. One analyst estimate counts about 16,000 installations in 2025, more than 80% in China13. For driverless cars, an insurance-institute study found 81% fewer injury crashes per mile than human drivers in four cities from 2021 to 20245. The rules are moving: the EU Machinery Regulation applies from 20 January 202717, and the UN adopted a global regulation for automated driving systems on 24 June 202622. The footprint is thinly measured: energy use, battery supply and field safety data are not published on a common basis. This baseline sets out what the evidence supports and where it is thin. It forecasts no deployment and ranks no country or vendor.

S.2Key messages

Six readings that frame the robotics baseline, and the eight questions this edition answers, each with its status and source.

  1. More than 600,000 in 2025, with 5 million in operation.1

    How many industrial robots are installed?Reported

  2. China installed 59% of the 2025 total; the United States was second.1

    Where are they?Reported

  3. Research shows pooled data and shared policies; no common measure of success exists.81112

    Are learned robot policies general yet?Reported

  4. One study found fewer injury crashes per mile for one fleet in four cities.5

    Are driverless cars safer than people?Reported

  5. EU machinery rules apply from January 2027; UN vehicle rules were adopted in June 2026.1722

    What do the rules say?Reported

  6. About 16,000 in 2025 by one estimate; sources differ.1327

    How many humanoids are shipped?Reported

  7. Magnet export licensing affected a humanoid programme in 2025.21

    Is the supply base exposed?Reported

  8. Humanoid pilots in workplaces ahead of a published safety standard. SCN-XT03-HUM-01

    What will 2027 test first?Expert input

S.3Headline finding

ReportedEQL 5NRF-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-001

The IFR reports more than 600,000 industrial robots installed in 2025, up 11%, and an operational stock of 5 million, up 9%.

Figure S.1Industrial robot installations (thousand units)
ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
2024542
2025, floor (more than 600)600

Sources: International Federation of Robotics12. The 2025 bar shows the stated floor of 600,000.

Industrial robots are an established infrastructure. The 2025 installations exceeded the 575,000 that the IFR forecast a year earlier, method (1)12. China installed 354,000, and Chinese suppliers held 55% of their home market1. The stock grew 9% by the IFR, while the rounded figures of 5 million and 4.66 million imply about 7%, method (4), a difference probably due to rounding or revision.

S.4At a glance

>600thousand

industrial robots installed, 20251

5million

operational stock, 20251

59%

China share of installations1

1,220per 10,000

highest reported density, 20243

≈16thousand

humanoid installations, 202513

164votes

UN resolution on autonomous weapons, 202518

S.5What each steward reads in it

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports reading robotics as installed infrastructure and as a test of institutions.

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people the robot story arrives as a video of a humanoid, a driverless car in the street or a warehouse headline.

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. Company statements describe fleets and plans, independent evidence is thin, and labour adjustment costs fall locally.

NEXUS

Synthesis

Robotics is well described by fleet statistics and thinly measured as a system.

S.6What this edition is, and is not

What this edition is

A baseline: the 2026 state of robotics and autonomous systems as infrastructure and the couplings through which it carries risk into other systems. It synthesises published evidence and ranks no country, company or asset.

What it is not

Not a forecast of robot deployment, a technology ranking, an endorsement of any vendor or an assessment of any programme. Safety rules, export controls and weapons policy are decisions of competent authorities.

What comes next

National, regional and sector evidence feeds the 2027 robotics edition through the federation. Each edition reports what changed against this baseline: observations, source revisions, method changes, scenario updates and corrections.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Five Million Robots now Operate in Factories Globally (World Robotics 2026 press release, Frankfurt, 24 September 2026; installations of more than 600,000 in 2025, up 11%; China 354,000; stock 5 million; forecast 655,000 in 2026 and 806,000 in 2029). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 8Open X-Embodiment Collaboration, Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models, arXiv:2310.08864, submitted 13 October 2023, revised 14 May 2025 (22 robots, 21 institutions). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 11Octo Model Team, Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy, arXiv:2405.12213, submitted 20 May 2024 (800,000 trajectories from Open X-Embodiment; nine robot platforms). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 13Counterpoint Research (ed.), Global Humanoid Robot Installations Reach 16,000 Units in 2025 as Mass Production Picks Pace (release of 14 January 2026; China above 80%; the page does not describe the method). Analyst estimate, weak evidence. Counterpoint Research, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 5Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (ed.), Waymo’s driverless cars crash less often than people (news release, 23 July 2026; about 50 million driverless miles, 2021 to 2024; 68% lower crash involvement; 81% fewer injury crashes per mile; four cities). IIHS, Arlington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 17European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (ed.), Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 on machinery, legislation page (applies from 20 January 2027; replaces Directive 2006/42/EC; aims to cover autonomous mobile machinery and artificial-intelligence safety modules). EU-OSHA, Bilbao. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 22Connected Automated Driving (ed.), UNECE adopts first-ever global rules allowing fully autonomous vehicles (page of 8 July 2026; adopted 24 June 2026; safety-case approach; about 90 existing UN regulations amended). Trade summary of a UN decision, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 12Li, C. et al., BEHAVIOR-1K: A Human-Centered, Embodied AI Benchmark with 1,000 Everyday Activities and Realistic Simulation, arXiv:2403.09227, submitted 14 March 2024 (abstract page; 1,000 activities, 50 scenes). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: Omdia estimate of humanoid shipments in 2025 (about 13,000 units, largest supplier about 5,168 units), taken from a search summary of a news report of 8 January 2026. Analyst estimate. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 21Adamas Intelligence (ed.), Musk on rare earth export restrictions: Optimus was affected (article of 24 April 2025; Tesla first-quarter 2025 earnings call; arm actuators use permanent magnets). Trade analysis reporting a company statement, weak evidence. Adamas Intelligence, Toronto. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 2International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Global Robot Demand in Factories Doubles Over 10 Years (World Robotics 2025 press release, Frankfurt, 25 September 2025; installations 542,000 in 2024; stock 4,664,000; forecast about 575,000 for 2025). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 3International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Robot Density Surges in Europe, Asia and Americas (press release, 8 April 2026; 2024 density: South Korea 1,220, Singapore 818, China 166, global average 132 robots per 10,000 employees). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 18United Nations General Assembly, resolution A/RES/80/57, Lethal autonomous weapons systems, adopted 1 December 2025 (164 in favour, 6 against, 7 abstentions), vote record page. United Nations, New York. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Robots are infrastructure and a test of institutions

Part I describes systems and their couplings. It ranks no country or operator and assesses no authority.

7 min read2 figures1 table15 notesNR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

1.1The questions this part answers

Key questions

  • Where is robotics risk concentrated?
  • Which couplings carry robotics shocks into other systems?
  • Which robotics capabilities hold under compound stress?
  • What must 2027 evidence measure first?

In this part

  • Narrative
  • Headline finding
  • Lead figure
  • Five footprint and governance chapters
  • Twelve-domain reading
  • Sector screens
  • Dependency matrix
  • Risk objects
  • Capability ladder
  • Scenario
  • Three lenses
  • Portfolio

1.2The argument

Robotics is usually discussed as a technology race. The 2026 evidence reads it as two things at once: a physical fleet that is already large and concentrated, and a test of whether safety rules, labour institutions and supply chains keep pace with machines that act in the physical world11721.

The fleet evidence is strong. The IFR reports more than 600,000 industrial robots installed in 2025 and 5 million in operation1. The installations are concentrated: China accounts for 59% of them1. Density per manufacturing worker is highest in South Korea at 1,220 per 10,000 employees, and the global average is 1323.

Learned control is the fast-moving part. Pooled data from 22 robot types and shared policies are published811, and company papers report generalist models710. A household benchmark of 1,000 activities states that long-horizon tasks remain hard for current methods12. Humanoid volumes are small, and estimates differ1327.

The rules are arriving unevenly. EU machinery rules apply from January 202717, UN vehicle regulations were adopted in June 202622, and a UN vote on autonomous weapons passed with 164 votes in favour18. Energy use, battery supply and field safety data are the least measured parts.

Figure 1.1How did installations compare with the forecast? Thousand units

The 2025 installations were at least about 4% above the forecast the IFR published a year earlier. A single forecast miss shows nothing about later years12.

ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
2025 forecast made in 2025575
2025 installations, floor of the reported total600

Source: as cited in the note to this figure. Year 2025.

Figure ID FIG-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-01-003

>600thousand

installed in 20251

575thousand

forecast for 2025, made in 20252

542thousand

installed in 20242

655thousand

forecast for 20261

1.3Twenty couplings between five systems

The robotics-centred matrix types the twenty couplings between the five core systems, read for their robotics content. Strengths are Nexus estimates (ESTIMATED) from the cited evidence and analogue events; they set the graph that 2027 evidence will test.

Figure 1.2Couplings between the five systems

Each line is one coupling from one system to another, drawn by the strength the edition assigns. Strengths are Nexus estimates from the cited evidence and analogue events.

  • Strong
  • Moderate
  • Weak

Source: this edition’s coupling matrix (Table 1.1); status Estimated.

Table 1.1Coupling matrix: from the row system to the column system
From, toWATENEFOOHLTBIO
WAT Water·WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
ENE EnergyWEAK
no documented link
·WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
powered medical devices, undocumented
WEAK
no documented link
FOO FoodWEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
·WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
HLT HealthWEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
·WEAK
no documented link
BIO BiodiversityWEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
WEAK
no documented link
·
Strength: strong, moderate or weak; a Nexus estimate (status Estimated) from cited evidence and analogue events. The scale is defined in Annex A.

Transmission paths

  1. 01

    TRD → MIN → INF

    Magnet export licensing slows actuator supply for robots.

    Reported 2025 licensing and a humanoid programme21

  2. 02

    AIC → INF

    Learned control widens the tasks robots can attempt.

    Reported pooled data and shared policies811

  3. 03

    INF → FIN

    Fleet scale shifts labour demand in exposed local markets.

    Inferred US labour-market study, 1990 to 200720

  4. 04

    ENE → INF

    Facility power and battery supply constrain fleet growth.

    Expert input no figure bound

  5. 05

    GOV → INF

    Safety rules set when machines may be placed on the market.

    Reported EU and UN rules1722

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Five Million Robots now Operate in Factories Globally (World Robotics 2026 press release, Frankfurt, 24 September 2026; installations of more than 600,000 in 2025, up 11%; China 354,000; stock 5 million; forecast 655,000 in 2026 and 806,000 in 2029). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 17European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (ed.), Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 on machinery, legislation page (applies from 20 January 2027; replaces Directive 2006/42/EC; aims to cover autonomous mobile machinery and artificial-intelligence safety modules). EU-OSHA, Bilbao. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 21Adamas Intelligence (ed.), Musk on rare earth export restrictions: Optimus was affected (article of 24 April 2025; Tesla first-quarter 2025 earnings call; arm actuators use permanent magnets). Trade analysis reporting a company statement, weak evidence. Adamas Intelligence, Toronto. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 3International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Robot Density Surges in Europe, Asia and Americas (press release, 8 April 2026; 2024 density: South Korea 1,220, Singapore 818, China 166, global average 132 robots per 10,000 employees). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 8Open X-Embodiment Collaboration, Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models, arXiv:2310.08864, submitted 13 October 2023, revised 14 May 2025 (22 robots, 21 institutions). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 11Octo Model Team, Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy, arXiv:2405.12213, submitted 20 May 2024 (800,000 trajectories from Open X-Embodiment; nine robot platforms). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 7Brohan, A. et al., RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control, arXiv:2307.15818, submitted 28 July 2023 (company authors; 6,000 evaluation trials). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 10Gemini Robotics Team, Gemini Robotics: Bringing AI into the Physical World, arXiv:2503.20020, submitted 25 March 2025 (company preprint; learning of short-horizon tasks from as few as 100 demonstrations). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 12Li, C. et al., BEHAVIOR-1K: A Human-Centered, Embodied AI Benchmark with 1,000 Everyday Activities and Realistic Simulation, arXiv:2403.09227, submitted 14 March 2024 (abstract page; 1,000 activities, 50 scenes). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 13Counterpoint Research (ed.), Global Humanoid Robot Installations Reach 16,000 Units in 2025 as Mass Production Picks Pace (release of 14 January 2026; China above 80%; the page does not describe the method). Analyst estimate, weak evidence. Counterpoint Research, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: Omdia estimate of humanoid shipments in 2025 (about 13,000 units, largest supplier about 5,168 units), taken from a search summary of a news report of 8 January 2026. Analyst estimate. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 22Connected Automated Driving (ed.), UNECE adopts first-ever global rules allowing fully autonomous vehicles (page of 8 July 2026; adopted 24 June 2026; safety-case approach; about 90 existing UN regulations amended). Trade summary of a UN decision, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 18United Nations General Assembly, resolution A/RES/80/57, Lethal autonomous weapons systems, adopted 1 December 2025 (164 in favour, 6 against, 7 abstentions), vote record page. United Nations, New York. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 2International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Global Robot Demand in Factories Doubles Over 10 Years (World Robotics 2025 press release, Frankfurt, 25 September 2025; installations 542,000 in 2024; stock 4,664,000; forecast about 575,000 for 2025). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 20Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P., Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets, NBER Working Paper 23285, March 2017 (US adoption 1990 to 2007). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Key findings

Twelve findings carry the robotics baseline. They are grouped by coupling and never ranked. Each resolves to its source or, where Nexus analysis is involved, to its stated method.

7 min read1 figure0 tables22 notesNR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

2.1Headline finding

ReportedEQL 5NRF-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-001

The IFR reports more than 600,000 industrial robots installed in 2025, up 11%, and an operational stock of 5 million, up 9%.

Figure 2.1Industrial robot installations (thousand units)
ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
2024542
2025, floor (more than 600)600

Sources: International Federation of Robotics12. The 2025 bar shows the stated floor of 600,000.

Implication

Industrial robots are an established infrastructure. The 2025 installations exceeded the 575,000 that the IFR forecast a year earlier, method (1)12. China installed 354,000, and Chinese suppliers held 55% of their home market1. The stock grew 9% by the IFR, while the rounded figures of 5 million and 4.66 million imply about 7%, method (4), a difference probably due to rounding or revision.

What would move it

The IFR forecast of 655,000 for 2026 and 806,000 for 20291, national releases and service robot statistics would each move this finding.

2.2Infrastructure

  1. ReportedEQL 5NRF-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-001

    The IFR reports more than 600,000 industrial robots installed in 2025, up 11%, and an operational stock of 5 million, up 9%; China installed 354,000, 59% of the world total.12

  2. ReportedEQL 5NRF-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-002

    The IFR reports 2024 robot density of 1,220 robots per 10,000 manufacturing employees in South Korea and 818 in Singapore, against a global average of 132 and 166 in China.3

  3. ReportedEQL 2NRF-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-005

    One analyst estimate counts about 16,000 humanoid robot installations in 2025, more than 80% in China; a second analyst estimate is lower and company claims differ.132728

  4. ReportedEQL 2NRF-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-006

    Amazon states that it has deployed its one millionth robot across more than 300 facilities and projects a 10% gain in fleet travel time from a new coordination model; both are company statements.14

  5. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-INF-007

    An insurance-institute study of about 50 million driverless miles found 68% lower crash involvement and 81% fewer injury crashes per mile than human drivers in four US cities, 2021 to 2024; the operator reports larger reductions in its own analysis.456

2.3AIC

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-AIC-003

    An open dataset pools data from 22 robot types across 21 institutions, and a published generalist policy was trained on 800,000 trajectories from it.811

  2. ReportedEQL 2NRF-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-AIC-004

    A company paper reports that a robot foundation model can learn new short-horizon tasks from as few as 100 demonstrations; the result is vendor-authored and not independently reproduced.10

2.4Governance

  1. ReportedEQL 4NRF-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-GOV-008

    The EU Machinery Regulation replaces the Machinery Directive and applies from 20 January 2027; the EU AI Act applies to AI-based safety components of products such as surgical robots.161735

  2. ReportedEQL 3NRF-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-GOV-009

    The UN body for vehicle regulations adopted a global technical regulation and a UN regulation for automated driving systems on 24 June 2026, covering driverless systems built on a safety case.2223

  3. ReportedEQL 5NRF-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-GOV-010

    The UN General Assembly adopted resolution A/RES/80/57 on lethal autonomous weapons systems on 1 December 2025 by 164 votes to 6, with 7 abstentions.1819

2.5Minerals

  1. ReportedEQL 3NRF-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-MIN-011

    China imposed licensing on seven rare earth elements and magnets in April 2025, and Tesla said its humanoid robot programme was affected because arm actuators use permanent magnets.2141

2.6Systemic

  1. Expert inputEQL 2NRF-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-SYS-012

    The leading compound pathway for 2027 testing is humanoid pilots entering workplaces before a published safety standard exists, while magnet supply and labour effects are unmeasured. § scenario

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Five Million Robots now Operate in Factories Globally (World Robotics 2026 press release, Frankfurt, 24 September 2026; installations of more than 600,000 in 2025, up 11%; China 354,000; stock 5 million; forecast 655,000 in 2026 and 806,000 in 2029). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 2International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Global Robot Demand in Factories Doubles Over 10 Years (World Robotics 2025 press release, Frankfurt, 25 September 2025; installations 542,000 in 2024; stock 4,664,000; forecast about 575,000 for 2025). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 3International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Robot Density Surges in Europe, Asia and Americas (press release, 8 April 2026; 2024 density: South Korea 1,220, Singapore 818, China 166, global average 132 robots per 10,000 employees). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 13Counterpoint Research (ed.), Global Humanoid Robot Installations Reach 16,000 Units in 2025 as Mass Production Picks Pace (release of 14 January 2026; China above 80%; the page does not describe the method). Analyst estimate, weak evidence. Counterpoint Research, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: Omdia estimate of humanoid shipments in 2025 (about 13,000 units, largest supplier about 5,168 units), taken from a search summary of a news report of 8 January 2026. Analyst estimate. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: Unitree company claim of more than 5,500 humanoid robots shipped in 2025, taken from a search summary of a news report. Company claim, weak evidence. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 14Amazon (ed.), announcement of its one millionth robot and the DeepFleet coordination model (company page; more than 300 facilities; 10% travel-time improvement stated as a projection; the page gives no date, coverage places it in July 2025). Company statement, weak evidence. Amazon, Seattle. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 4Waymo (ed.), Safety Impact hub (page read November 2026; 271.3 million rider-only miles through June 2026; about 95% fewer serious-injury-or-worse crashes than a human benchmark). Company-reported analysis, weak evidence. Waymo, Mountain View. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 5Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (ed.), Waymo’s driverless cars crash less often than people (news release, 23 July 2026; about 50 million driverless miles, 2021 to 2024; 68% lower crash involvement; 81% fewer injury crashes per mile; four cities). IIHS, Arlington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 6Kusano, K.D. et al., Comparison of Waymo Rider-Only Crash Data to Human Benchmarks at 7.1 Million Miles, arXiv:2312.12675, submitted 20 December 2023, revised 24 October 2024 (authors employed by the operator). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 8Open X-Embodiment Collaboration, Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models, arXiv:2310.08864, submitted 13 October 2023, revised 14 May 2025 (22 robots, 21 institutions). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 11Octo Model Team, Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy, arXiv:2405.12213, submitted 20 May 2024 (800,000 trajectories from Open X-Embodiment; nine robot platforms). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 10Gemini Robotics Team, Gemini Robotics: Bringing AI into the Physical World, arXiv:2503.20020, submitted 25 March 2025 (company preprint; learning of short-horizon tasks from as few as 100 demonstrations). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 16European Commission (ed.), AI Act, regulatory framework page (entered into force 1 August 2024; high-risk dates revised by an omnibus in force 27 July 2026; AI-based safety components of products such as surgical robots treated as high-risk). Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 17European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (ed.), Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 on machinery, legislation page (applies from 20 January 2027; replaces Directive 2006/42/EC; aims to cover autonomous mobile machinery and artificial-intelligence safety modules). EU-OSHA, Bilbao. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2023 on machinery, Official Journal of the European Union; the official page returned no content, summary read through the EU-OSHA page. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 22Connected Automated Driving (ed.), UNECE adopts first-ever global rules allowing fully autonomous vehicles (page of 8 July 2026; adopted 24 June 2026; safety-case approach; about 90 existing UN regulations amended). Trade summary of a UN decision, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 23Bennett Jones (ed.), First Global Regulatory Framework For Autonomous Vehicles (law-firm blog, August 2026; GTR No. 26 and UN Regulation No. 185; SAE levels 3 to 5; legal status of each). Secondary legal commentary, weak evidence. Bennett Jones, Toronto. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 18United Nations General Assembly, resolution A/RES/80/57, Lethal autonomous weapons systems, adopted 1 December 2025 (164 in favour, 6 against, 7 abstentions), vote record page. United Nations, New York. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 19International Committee of the Red Cross (ed.), ICRC position on autonomous weapon systems (Geneva, 12 May 2021; recommends prohibiting unpredictable systems and systems that target people, and regulating the rest). ICRC, Geneva. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 21Adamas Intelligence (ed.), Musk on rare earth export restrictions: Optimus was affected (article of 24 April 2025; Tesla first-quarter 2025 earnings call; arm actuators use permanent magnets). Trade analysis reporting a company statement, weak evidence. Adamas Intelligence, Toronto. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (ed.), announcement of export controls on seven rare earth elements and related magnets, April 2025, taken from a search summary. MOFCOM, Beijing. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Systems and sectors at baseline

6 min read0 figures2 tables15 notesNR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

3.1Where each system stood at evidence close

INF · Fleets

Industrial robots installed in 2025

>600thousand

11% above 2024.

Reported2025IFR1

INF · Stock

Operational stock of industrial robots

5million

up 9% on the year.

Reported2025IFR1

TRD · Concentration

China share of installations

59%

354,000 units; suppliers from China held 55% of their home market.

Reported2025IFR1

INF · Density

Robots per 10,000 manufacturing employees, highest reported

1,220robots

South Korea; the global average is 132.

Reported2024IFR3

AIC · Learned control

Robot types in the pooled open dataset

22robot types

from 21 institutions; a research result.

Reported2023preprint8

SYS · Cross-system

Humanoid robot installations, analyst estimate

≈16thousand

over 80% in China; estimates differ by source.

Reported2025Counterpoint13

3.2Domain posture

Each of the twelve coupled domains is read through robotics, in words, not scored. The coupling column names the dependency that carries robotics risk into each domain.

Table 3.1Each domain read in words, not scored
DomainPosture at baselineCouplingStatus
WATNo documented coupling at baseline; cooling and washdown use of robot facilities is not evidenced here.none documentedExpert input EQL 1
ENEEnergy and battery demand of fleets is unpublished; warehouse and factory loads are not bound.ENE ↔ INFExpert input EQL 1
FOONo documented coupling at baseline; agricultural and food robots are not evidenced here.none documentedExpert input EQL 1
HLTSurgical robots are in wide use by one vendor filing; no figure is bound from an opened source.INF → HLTExpert input EQL 1
BIONo documented coupling at baseline.none documentedExpert input EQL 1
CLIFootprint at scale is not bound; no figure for robot-related emissions was read.none documentedExpert input EQL 1
INFThe core system: 5 million industrial robots in operation, driverless vehicles in service, humanoid pilots.the core systemReported EQL 5
FINCompany statements on fleets and production plans; no investment totals bound.FIN → INFReported EQL 2
DATPooled robot datasets exist; safety and incident data are not consolidated.INF ↔ DATReported EQL 3
AICLearned control: generalist policies in research, a household benchmark that remains hard.AIC → INFReported EQL 4
MINRare earth magnet licensing affected a humanoid programme in 2025.MIN → INFReported EQL 3
TRDInstallations are concentrated in China, and export controls shape magnet access.INF ↔ TRDReported EQL 4

3.3Sector screens

All sixteen sectors are screened for their dependence on robotics, on the same grammar as every national edition. The evidence column describes coverage of the baseline evidence, not the performance of the sector.

Table 3.2Sectors: baseline evidence and the exposure to watch
CodeSectorBaseline evidenceExposure to watchEvidence coverage
GS-00Cross-systemrobots couple to energy, minerals and labourpilot deployments before standardsTHIN
GS-01Waterno documented couplingnone documentedTHIN
GS-02Energyfleet energy demand unpublishedload from large facilitiesTHIN
GS-03Foodno documented couplingnone documentedTHIN
GS-04Healthsurgical robots not evidenced from opened sourcessafety of medical robotsTHIN
GS-05Financecompany fleet statements14labour adjustment costTHIN
GS-06Developmentaccess to automation and skillswidening gapsTHIN
GS-07Climatefootprint at scale not boundenergy demandTHIN
GS-08Disasterno documented couplingnone documentedTHIN
GS-09Infrastructurewarehouse fleets and driverless vehicles414single-operator dependencePARTIAL
GS-10Citiesdriverless vehicles in four US cities5street-level safety dataPARTIAL
GS-11Biodiversityno documented couplingnone documentedTHIN
GS-12Earth observationdrone rules under review25airspace integrationTHIN
GS-13Cyber and digitalcybersecurity named in the new robot safety standard31connected fleetsTHIN
GS-14PolicyEU machinery rules and UN vehicle regulation1722divergent national rulesGOOD
GS-15Sciencepreprints on learned control7891011common benchmarksPARTIAL

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Five Million Robots now Operate in Factories Globally (World Robotics 2026 press release, Frankfurt, 24 September 2026; installations of more than 600,000 in 2025, up 11%; China 354,000; stock 5 million; forecast 655,000 in 2026 and 806,000 in 2029). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 3International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Robot Density Surges in Europe, Asia and Americas (press release, 8 April 2026; 2024 density: South Korea 1,220, Singapore 818, China 166, global average 132 robots per 10,000 employees). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 8Open X-Embodiment Collaboration, Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models, arXiv:2310.08864, submitted 13 October 2023, revised 14 May 2025 (22 robots, 21 institutions). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 13Counterpoint Research (ed.), Global Humanoid Robot Installations Reach 16,000 Units in 2025 as Mass Production Picks Pace (release of 14 January 2026; China above 80%; the page does not describe the method). Analyst estimate, weak evidence. Counterpoint Research, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 14Amazon (ed.), announcement of its one millionth robot and the DeepFleet coordination model (company page; more than 300 facilities; 10% travel-time improvement stated as a projection; the page gives no date, coverage places it in July 2025). Company statement, weak evidence. Amazon, Seattle. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 4Waymo (ed.), Safety Impact hub (page read November 2026; 271.3 million rider-only miles through June 2026; about 95% fewer serious-injury-or-worse crashes than a human benchmark). Company-reported analysis, weak evidence. Waymo, Mountain View. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 5Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (ed.), Waymo’s driverless cars crash less often than people (news release, 23 July 2026; about 50 million driverless miles, 2021 to 2024; 68% lower crash involvement; 81% fewer injury crashes per mile; four cities). IIHS, Arlington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 25UAV Coach (ed.), FAA Says Part 108 Is on the 10-Yard Line, but the BVLOS Rule Is Still Stuck at the White House (article of 16 September 2026; final rule sent to OIRA on 10 July 2026; FAA hopes to publish before the end of 2026). Trade press, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Organization for Standardization (ed.), ISO 10218-1:2025 Robots and robotic devices, safety requirements for industrial robots, Part 1 (third edition, published 5 February 2025), taken from a search summary of the catalogue entry. ISO, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 17European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (ed.), Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 on machinery, legislation page (applies from 20 January 2027; replaces Directive 2006/42/EC; aims to cover autonomous mobile machinery and artificial-intelligence safety modules). EU-OSHA, Bilbao. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 22Connected Automated Driving (ed.), UNECE adopts first-ever global rules allowing fully autonomous vehicles (page of 8 July 2026; adopted 24 June 2026; safety-case approach; about 90 existing UN regulations amended). Trade summary of a UN decision, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 7Brohan, A. et al., RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control, arXiv:2307.15818, submitted 28 July 2023 (company authors; 6,000 evaluation trials). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 9Black, K. et al., pi0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control, arXiv:2410.24164, submitted 31 October 2024, revised 8 January 2026 (company preprint). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 10Gemini Robotics Team, Gemini Robotics: Bringing AI into the Physical World, arXiv:2503.20020, submitted 25 March 2025 (company preprint; learning of short-horizon tasks from as few as 100 demonstrations). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 11Octo Model Team, Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy, arXiv:2405.12213, submitted 20 May 2024 (800,000 trajectories from Open X-Embodiment; nine robot platforms). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Risks and capability

Four robotics risk objects open the portfolio. Order carries no rank. Each is read across driver, exposure, vulnerability, capacity, cascade and consequence.

6 min read0 figures1 table23 notesNR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

4.1Risk objects

Each risk is read across the chain from hazard to consequence, with its status and evidence-quality level.

  1. InferredEQL 3RSK-XT03-GOV-001

    Rules lag deployment

    Driver
    humanoid and mobile platforms entering workplaces ahead of finished standards1532
    Exposure
    workers in factories and warehouses; the public near driverless vehicles
    Vulnerability
    draft standards; rules that differ between jurisdictions
    Capacity
    machinery rules, vehicle regulation and robot safety standards172231
    Cascade
    GOV → INF, FIN
    Horizon
    1 to 5 years
  2. InferredEQL 3RSK-XT03-MIN-002

    Magnet and actuator supply chokepoint

    Driver
    export licensing on rare earth elements and magnets2141
    Exposure
    actuator makers; humanoid and legged platforms
    Vulnerability
    few suppliers; concentrated processing3940
    Capacity
    alternative motor designs; stocks; recycling
    Cascade
    MIN → INF
    Horizon
    1 to 5 years
  3. Expert inputEQL 2RSK-XT03-INF-003

    Thin field safety evidence

    Driver
    one study of road vehicles and no consolidated data elsewhere530
    Exposure
    planners who treat company statistics as settled
    Vulnerability
    incident reporting that differs by sector
    Capacity
    federal crash reporting and independent studies530
    Cascade
    INF → DAT → GOV
    Horizon
    1 to 5 years
  4. InferredEQL 2RSK-XT03-FIN-004

    Local labour adjustment

    Driver
    rising fleets in concentrated markets120
    Exposure
    workers in routine manufacturing and logistics roles
    Vulnerability
    regions with one dominant employer or sector
    Capacity
    skills programmes; social protection; none bound here
    Cascade
    FIN → HLT, DAT
    Horizon
    5 to 10 years

4.2Capability ladder

Existence is not readiness. Each of the fifteen capability functions is placed on the ladder by the strongest public evidence for robotics at the global level.

Table 4.1Capabilities on the ladder of evidence: listed, exists, demonstrated, tested
FunctionRungLevelStrongest public evidence at baseline
Prevention and mitigationEXISTSrobot safety standards and machinery rules published3135
Monitoring and observationLISTEDno common tracker of robot incidents outside road vehicles30
Early warningLISTEDnot consolidated across sectors
Preparedness and planningEXISTSEU machinery timetable and UN vehicle regulation1722
Redundancy and reservesLISTEDmagnet and actuator stocks are not documented41
ResponseLISTEDno tested response to a fleet-wide fault
Continuity of critical servicesLISTEDdependence of logistics on fleets not reported
RecoveryLISTEDnot applicable at baseline; no event to recover from
AdaptationLISTEDrules for learning systems are still being written1636
Social protectionLISTEDnot bound here
Finance and insuranceLISTEDan insurance-institute study exists for road vehicles5
Institutional coordinationEXISTSstandards bodies and the UN vehicle forum223132
Technical infrastructureEXISTSlarge installed fleets and driverless services14
WorkforceLISTEDno recent figure bound
Research capacityADEQUATEstrong preprint base on learned control789101112
A capability listed in policy is not a tested one; each rung is the strongest public evidence at baseline.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 15Engadget (ed.), Boston Dynamics unveils production-ready version of Atlas robot at CES 2026 (report of 8 January 2026; first customers Hyundai and Google DeepMind; Hyundai plans car-plant use from 2028). Trade press reporting a company plan, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 32UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Organization for Standardization (ed.), ISO 25785-1, safety requirements for industrial mobile robots with actively controlled stability, Part 1: Robots, committee draft in preparation, taken from a search summary of the catalogue entry. ISO, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 17European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (ed.), Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 on machinery, legislation page (applies from 20 January 2027; replaces Directive 2006/42/EC; aims to cover autonomous mobile machinery and artificial-intelligence safety modules). EU-OSHA, Bilbao. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 22Connected Automated Driving (ed.), UNECE adopts first-ever global rules allowing fully autonomous vehicles (page of 8 July 2026; adopted 24 June 2026; safety-case approach; about 90 existing UN regulations amended). Trade summary of a UN decision, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Organization for Standardization (ed.), ISO 10218-1:2025 Robots and robotic devices, safety requirements for industrial robots, Part 1 (third edition, published 5 February 2025), taken from a search summary of the catalogue entry. ISO, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 21Adamas Intelligence (ed.), Musk on rare earth export restrictions: Optimus was affected (article of 24 April 2025; Tesla first-quarter 2025 earnings call; arm actuators use permanent magnets). Trade analysis reporting a company statement, weak evidence. Adamas Intelligence, Toronto. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (ed.), announcement of export controls on seven rare earth elements and related magnets, April 2025, taken from a search summary. MOFCOM, Beijing. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026, the page returned an access error; no figure used. International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Geological Survey (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, rare earths, the file returned an access error; no figure used. USGS, Reston. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 5Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (ed.), Waymo’s driverless cars crash less often than people (news release, 23 July 2026; about 50 million driverless miles, 2021 to 2024; 68% lower crash involvement; 81% fewer injury crashes per mile; four cities). IIHS, Arlington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (ed.), Standing General Order 2021-01 on crash reporting, Third Amended order of 24 April 2025, taken from a search summary; the agency page returned an access error. NHTSA, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 1International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Five Million Robots now Operate in Factories Globally (World Robotics 2026 press release, Frankfurt, 24 September 2026; installations of more than 600,000 in 2025, up 11%; China 354,000; stock 5 million; forecast 655,000 in 2026 and 806,000 in 2029). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 20Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P., Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets, NBER Working Paper 23285, March 2017 (US adoption 1990 to 2007). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2023 on machinery, Official Journal of the European Union; the official page returned no content, summary read through the EU-OSHA page. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 16European Commission (ed.), AI Act, regulatory framework page (entered into force 1 August 2024; high-risk dates revised by an omnibus in force 27 July 2026; AI-based safety components of products such as surgical robots treated as high-risk). Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence, Official Journal of the European Union, 2024, cited from memory; summary read through the Commission page. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 4Waymo (ed.), Safety Impact hub (page read November 2026; 271.3 million rider-only miles through June 2026; about 95% fewer serious-injury-or-worse crashes than a human benchmark). Company-reported analysis, weak evidence. Waymo, Mountain View. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 7Brohan, A. et al., RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control, arXiv:2307.15818, submitted 28 July 2023 (company authors; 6,000 evaluation trials). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 8Open X-Embodiment Collaboration, Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models, arXiv:2310.08864, submitted 13 October 2023, revised 14 May 2025 (22 robots, 21 institutions). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 9Black, K. et al., pi0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control, arXiv:2410.24164, submitted 31 October 2024, revised 8 January 2026 (company preprint). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 10Gemini Robotics Team, Gemini Robotics: Bringing AI into the Physical World, arXiv:2503.20020, submitted 25 March 2025 (company preprint; learning of short-horizon tasks from as few as 100 demonstrations). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 11Octo Model Team, Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy, arXiv:2405.12213, submitted 20 May 2024 (800,000 trajectories from Open X-Embodiment; nine robot platforms). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 12Li, C. et al., BEHAVIOR-1K: A Human-Centered, Embodied AI Benchmark with 1,000 Everyday Activities and Realistic Simulation, arXiv:2403.09227, submitted 14 March 2024 (abstract page; 1,000 activities, 50 scenes). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Humanoid pilots meet a missing safety standard

A conditional statement under stated assumptions, never a prediction.

2 min read0 figures0 tables2 notesNR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

5.1Assumptions

Scenario SCN-XT03-HUM-01: what is assumed, and what is held constant.

Baseline
the 2026 reference state in this edition
Drivers
humanoid platforms enter workplaces for pilot tasks while the draft standard for dynamically stable robots is not published
Analogues
company plans for deployment from 2028; the 2025 magnet licensing episode1521
Interventions
none modelled: the specification describes the unmitigated case
Run state
narrative specification; quantified run scheduled for 2027

5.2The cascade, step by step

  1. 1

    INF → GOV

    pilots begin under general machinery rules

    2026

  2. 2

    MIN → INF

    actuator supply tightens as magnet licences slow

    2025

  3. 3

    GOV → INF

    a draft standard is finished and operators adapt

    2026

  4. 4

    INF → DAT

    incident records differ by site and operator

    2026

  5. 5

    INF → FIN

    local labour effects appear in pilot regions

    2026

  6. 6

    FIN → GOV

    regulators ask for common reporting

    2026

5.3The scenario as a table of steps

How the shock in scenario SCN-XT03-HUM-01 would travel through Robotics and Autonomous Systems‘s coupled systems, step by step, under the assumptions the edition states.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Infrastructure to governancePilots begin under general machinery rules. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition XT-03, scenario SCN-XT03-HUM-01, step 1
02 Minerals to infrastructureActuator supply tightens as magnet licences slow. Analogue or source: 2025.Edition XT-03, scenario SCN-XT03-HUM-01, step 2
03 Governance to infrastructureA draft standard is finished and operators adapt. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition XT-03, scenario SCN-XT03-HUM-01, step 3
04 Infrastructure to datIncident records differ by site and operator. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition XT-03, scenario SCN-XT03-HUM-01, step 4
05 Infrastructure to financeLocal labour effects appear in pilot regions. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition XT-03, scenario SCN-XT03-HUM-01, step 5
06 Finance to governanceRegulators ask for common reporting. Analogue or source: 2026.Edition XT-03, scenario SCN-XT03-HUM-01, step 6

A teaching model of a conditional scenario under the edition’s stated assumptions: not a forecast, not a prediction and not a warning. Sources: Robotics and Autonomous Systems 2026, scenario SCN-XT03-HUM-01 (2026); Robotics and Autonomous Systems 2026, references (NR-CIT-1) (2026).

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 15Engadget (ed.), Boston Dynamics unveils production-ready version of Atlas robot at CES 2026 (report of 8 January 2026; first customers Hyundai and Google DeepMind; Hyundai plans car-plant use from 2028). Trade press reporting a company plan, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 21Adamas Intelligence (ed.), Musk on rare earth export restrictions: Optimus was affected (article of 24 April 2025; Tesla first-quarter 2025 earnings call; arm actuators use permanent magnets). Trade analysis reporting a company statement, weak evidence. Adamas Intelligence, Toronto. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Readings from the other desks

The robotics baseline is read through each steward’s lens, then once as a whole. Each lens is a projection of reviewed findings, not a separate argument. The other desks’ own editions of this subject are listed first, as cross-references, not copies.

15 min read0 figures8 tables37 notesNR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

6.1The other desks’ editions of this subject

Federation: each desk writes its own edition for the subjects in its remit. Until a desk releases, its edition shows its frame and the reading this edition printed for it.

DeskEditionStateIdentifier
GCRI Systems EvidenceNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
GRF Public DeliberationOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
GRA Capital ReadinessOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit
Standards ProgressNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
Academy CapabilityNo edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycleNot in this cycle
Index MeasurementOutside this desk’s remitNot in remit

6.2Three lenses

One edition, read by each steward. The lens of this site comes first.

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports reading robotics as installed infrastructure and as a test of institutions. Fleets are large and concentrated, learned control is moving in research, and field safety and energy footprints are thinly measured. Evidence is strongest for fleet statistics and weakest for humanoid volumes and workforce effects.

INF-001 · INF-002 · INF-007 · SYS-012

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people the robot story arrives as a video of a humanoid, a driverless car in the street or a warehouse headline. The baseline asks that public debate separate research results, company claims and independent studies.

INF-005 · INF-006 · INF-007

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. Company statements describe fleets and plans, independent evidence is thin, and labour adjustment costs fall locally20. These show where finance-readiness evidence will matter. Nothing here is advice, a rating or an approval.

INF-006 · INF-007

NEXUS

Synthesis

Robotics is well described by fleet statistics and thinly measured as a system. The 2027 programme should bind field safety data, publish a comparable energy footprint and test the humanoid pilot pathway before standards arrive.

SYS-012 · R-01 · R-03

6.3Standards, Academy and steward contributions

How the Nexus Standards drafts, the Risk Academy and the three stewards feed each quarterly edition for robotics. The standards are a preparatory working draft (2026) and are cited as drafts, never as adopted standards.

Table 6.1The quarterly rhythm every edition follows
QuarterEditionQuestionBoundary
Q1State and AgendaWhat matters this year, and what is the starting position?observed baseline stays distinct from planned work
Q2Evidence and BuildWhat new evidence and capability exist?a configured capability is not a validated result
Q3Stress Test and ReadinessWhat do scenarios and tests show?simulated loss or performance is not observed impact
Q4Annual Synthesis and RenewalWhat changed in the year, and what renews?release follows review, not event publicity deadlines
Table 6.2Who contributes what each quarter
Steward or bodyRoleContribution route
GCRI CanadaLead Institution and Consortium Secretariat; publisher of record; technical truth (key T)science and practice communities · GCRI gateway
The Global Risks Forum (GRF)leadership, dialogue and the Universe programme; public meaning (key M)policy, Universe and national adoption · GRF gateway
The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)finance, insurance and development readiness; capital meaning (key F)finance and insurance · GRA gateway
Nexus Standardspreparatory drafts on vocabulary, hazards, indicators and methodsStandards site · working groups HAZ, IND, MTH, FIN, AI
Risk Academylearning pathways tied to the agenda questionsAcademy gateway · learning by review
Nexus Standards and Academytechnology chapter inputs: GCRI evidence, NXS standards, RA capabilitytechnology editorial board

Standards drafts used in this edition

  • Risk vocabulary NRS-C1 (424 terms) for terms in the glossary
  • Hazard atlas NHS-1 1.1.0 (905 hazards in 120 families) for risk objects
  • Seven risk classes: global, catastrophic, existential, emerging, planetary, exponential, frontier-tech

Standards calendar to watch

  • Founding calls from 20 October 2026; working groups meet from 5 November 2026
  • Inaugural Global Standards Council session, 12 January 2027
  • Quarterly reviews in March, June, September and December, aligned with each edition

6.4GCRI reading: the model card

GCRI’s reading of this edition is its model card: what the national model is, what it computes and where it stops. It is printed in full in Annex A, with the methods it belongs to. Annex A, methodology

6.5Global Risks Forum reading: editorial essays

Four signed essays by the Reports editorial team set out the positions this edition takes. They are interpretation, labelled as such; the evidence they draw on is in the findings register.

Robotics is a large installed fleet and a test for rules and institutions. The first is measured by industry statistics; the second is only starting to be measured. Keeping them apart avoids both hype and complacency.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 01

Two stories, one technology

A preprint, a company statement and an independent study carry different weight. This edition labels each and asks for a common basis before learned-control results are compared.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 02

Separate results, claims and studies

Energy, batteries, magnets and actuators are rarely counted. A published footprint would show whether scale is limited by physics, supply or money.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 03

The footprint is the blind spot

Standards for the robot, the cell and the vehicle exist or are due. Standards for legged and humanoid platforms are still in draft, and field data are thin.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 04

Safety rules arrive after the machines

6.6Global Risks Alliance reading: 2027 robotics readiness pack

The registers that open the 2027 global cycle. At baseline each is initialised from this edition.

Table 6.32027 robotics readiness pack
ItemRegisterState at baselineFirst 2027 entry
E1Robotics risk state deltabaseline set by this editionchanges against the baseline
E2WEFH+B state deltafive global system readings setindicator updates and freshness
E3Agenda and Portfolio movementeight agenda items · 6 proposed objectsadmission decisions
E4Federation delivery registernational chapters in preparationnational chapters
E5Consortium capability registernational consortia formingfirst contributions
E6Leadership questions and challengesnone yetfirst challenge log
E7Foundry technical statenational environments preparedfirst federation cut
E8Publication candidatestwelve findings carried forwardPUBLISH · HOLD dispositions
E9Universe readinessone candidate missionadmission and role spine
E10Correction registernonefirst federation-wide cycle

Publication dispositions

  • Publish
  • Hold
  • Needs evidence
  • Restricted
  • Superseded

6.7Nexus Standards reading: standards and regulatory watch

Instruments and published guidance that shape the systems in this edition, by status on the retrieval date. The edition assesses no one’s compliance.

  • IN FORCE
  • PUBLISHED
  • DRAFT
  • PUBLISHED · VOLUNTARY
Table 6.4Standards and regulatory watch
InstrumentBodyScopeStatusRelevance
ISO 10218-1:2025 robot safety31ISOglobalPUBLISHED 2025industrial robot requirements
ISO 13482 personal care robots33ISOglobalPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYnon-industrial mobile robots
ISO 3691-4 driverless industrial trucks34ISOglobalPUBLISHED · VOLUNTARYdriverless trucks
ISO 25785-1 dynamically stable mobile robots32ISOglobalDRAFTlegged and humanoid platforms
EU Machinery Regulation 2023/12301735European UnionEUAPPLIES FROM JANUARY 2027machinery placed on the market
EU AI Act 2024/16891636European UnionEUIN FORCE · PHASEDAI-based safety components
UN GTR 26 and UN Regulation 1852223UNECE WP.29globalADOPTED 2026automated driving systems
NHTSA Standing General Order30US DOT NHTSAUSIN FORCEcrash reporting
DoD Directive 3000.092438US Department of DefenseUSIN FORCEautonomy in weapon systems
FAA beyond visual line of sight rule2537FAAUSDRAFTdrone operations

Changed since 2024

  • The UN vehicle forum adopted rules for automated driving systems on 24 June 202622
  • The EU AI Act high-risk dates were revised by an omnibus that entered into force on 27 July 2026, as stated on the Commission page16
  • ISO 10218-1 was published in a third edition in February 202531

To watch in 2027

  • Application of the EU Machinery Regulation from 20 January 202717
  • The FAA final rule, under review since July 202625
  • Progress of the ISO draft for dynamically stable industrial mobile robots32

6.8Risk Academy reading: literature and evidence review, science and assessments

The review behind this edition covers robotics assessments, peer-reviewed science and the institutional reports that bind its findings. Systematic reviews for each agenda item begin in 2027.

Review protocol

Question
What does the published evidence establish about robotics and autonomous systems as infrastructure and its couplings?
Sources searched
preprints and journals; industry federation and agencies; standards and regulations; supply and labour analyses
Window
releases available at evidence close, 30 September 2026
Selection
sources that bind or contextualise a finding in this edition
Next step
systematic reviews for agenda items 01 to 05 in 2027
Table 6.5Peer-reviewed science and preprints
ReferenceTypeYearRoleUsed for
Brohan et al.7preprint2023contextvision-language-action models
Open X-Embodiment collaboration8preprint2023supportspooled robot data
Black et al.9preprint2024contextgeneralist policy
Gemini Robotics team10preprint2025contextcompany model
Octo Model Team11preprint2024supportsopen generalist policy
Li et al.12preprint2024supportshousehold benchmark
Kusano et al.6preprint2023contextroad vehicle crash comparison
Table 6.6Institutional statistics
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Acemoglu and Restrepo20working paper2017supportslabour effects
Autor43journal article2015contextautomation and jobs
Frey and Osborne44journal article2017contextexposure of occupations
Table 6.7Standards, policy and law
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
IFR World Robotics 2026 release1International Federation of Robotics2026supportsinstallations and stock
IFR World Robotics 2025 release2International Federation of Robotics2025supportsearlier installations
IFR robot density release3International Federation of Robotics2026supportsdensity
IIHS study5Insurance Institute for Highway Safety2026supportsroad vehicle safety
Machinery Regulation page17EU-OSHA2025supportsapplication date
Table 6.8Supply, labour and field overviews
ReferenceIssuerYearRoleUsed for
Humanoid installations13Counterpoint Research2026contextanalyst estimate
Amazon robot announcement14Amazon2025contextcompany statement
Atlas production report15trade press2026contextcompany plan
Rare earth controls21Adamas Intelligence2025contextmagnet supply
AI Index page26Stanford HAI2026contextfield overview

Where the evidence agrees

  • Installed fleets are large and growing, with a concentrated geography13
  • Learned control is advancing in research on shared data811
  • Rules for robots and driverless vehicles are being written now1722

Where it is unsettled

  • How many humanoid robots are shipped and what they do132728
  • How company safety claims compare with independent studies45
  • How large the energy and labour footprint of fleets will be20

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 20Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P., Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets, NBER Working Paper 23285, March 2017 (US adoption 1990 to 2007). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Organization for Standardization (ed.), ISO 10218-1:2025 Robots and robotic devices, safety requirements for industrial robots, Part 1 (third edition, published 5 February 2025), taken from a search summary of the catalogue entry. ISO, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Organization for Standardization (ed.), ISO 13482:2014 Robots and robotic devices, safety requirements for personal care robots, cited from memory. ISO, Geneva. Observation year 2014. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 34UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Organization for Standardization (ed.), ISO 3691-4 Industrial trucks, safety requirements and verification, Part 4: Driverless industrial trucks and their systems, cited from memory. ISO, Geneva. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 32UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Organization for Standardization (ed.), ISO 25785-1, safety requirements for industrial mobile robots with actively controlled stability, Part 1: Robots, committee draft in preparation, taken from a search summary of the catalogue entry. ISO, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 17European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (ed.), Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 on machinery, legislation page (applies from 20 January 2027; replaces Directive 2006/42/EC; aims to cover autonomous mobile machinery and artificial-intelligence safety modules). EU-OSHA, Bilbao. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2023 on machinery, Official Journal of the European Union; the official page returned no content, summary read through the EU-OSHA page. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 16European Commission (ed.), AI Act, regulatory framework page (entered into force 1 August 2024; high-risk dates revised by an omnibus in force 27 July 2026; AI-based safety components of products such as surgical robots treated as high-risk). Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence, Official Journal of the European Union, 2024, cited from memory; summary read through the Commission page. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 22Connected Automated Driving (ed.), UNECE adopts first-ever global rules allowing fully autonomous vehicles (page of 8 July 2026; adopted 24 June 2026; safety-case approach; about 90 existing UN regulations amended). Trade summary of a UN decision, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 23Bennett Jones (ed.), First Global Regulatory Framework For Autonomous Vehicles (law-firm blog, August 2026; GTR No. 26 and UN Regulation No. 185; SAE levels 3 to 5; legal status of each). Secondary legal commentary, weak evidence. Bennett Jones, Toronto. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (ed.), Standing General Order 2021-01 on crash reporting, Third Amended order of 24 April 2025, taken from a search summary; the agency page returned an access error. NHTSA, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 24Lawfare (ed.), Defense Department Updates Autonomous Weapons Systems Directive (article of 27 January 2023; directive reissued effective 25 January 2023; working group established; criteria not changed). Lawfare Institute, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Department of Defense (ed.), Directive 3000.09, Autonomy in Weapon Systems, 25 January 2023, text returned an access error; summary read through a news article. DoD, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 25UAV Coach (ed.), FAA Says Part 108 Is on the 10-Yard Line, but the BVLOS Rule Is Still Stuck at the White House (article of 16 September 2026; final rule sent to OIRA on 10 July 2026; FAA hopes to publish before the end of 2026). Trade press, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 37UNVERIFIED, not opened: Federal Aviation Administration (ed.), Normal Category Rulemaking for Beyond Visual Line of Sight, notice of proposed rulemaking (Part 108), August 2025, taken from a search summary of a law-firm note. FAA, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 7Brohan, A. et al., RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control, arXiv:2307.15818, submitted 28 July 2023 (company authors; 6,000 evaluation trials). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 8Open X-Embodiment Collaboration, Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models, arXiv:2310.08864, submitted 13 October 2023, revised 14 May 2025 (22 robots, 21 institutions). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 9Black, K. et al., pi0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control, arXiv:2410.24164, submitted 31 October 2024, revised 8 January 2026 (company preprint). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 10Gemini Robotics Team, Gemini Robotics: Bringing AI into the Physical World, arXiv:2503.20020, submitted 25 March 2025 (company preprint; learning of short-horizon tasks from as few as 100 demonstrations). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 11Octo Model Team, Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy, arXiv:2405.12213, submitted 20 May 2024 (800,000 trajectories from Open X-Embodiment; nine robot platforms). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 12Li, C. et al., BEHAVIOR-1K: A Human-Centered, Embodied AI Benchmark with 1,000 Everyday Activities and Realistic Simulation, arXiv:2403.09227, submitted 14 March 2024 (abstract page; 1,000 activities, 50 scenes). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 6Kusano, K.D. et al., Comparison of Waymo Rider-Only Crash Data to Human Benchmarks at 7.1 Million Miles, arXiv:2312.12675, submitted 20 December 2023, revised 24 October 2024 (authors employed by the operator). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  24. 43UNVERIFIED, not opened: Autor, D.H., Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation, Journal of Economic Perspectives 29(3), 3 to 30, 2015, cited from memory. Observation year 2015. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  25. 44UNVERIFIED, not opened: Frey, C.B. and Osborne, M.A., The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114, 254 to 280, 2017, cited from memory. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  26. 1International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Five Million Robots now Operate in Factories Globally (World Robotics 2026 press release, Frankfurt, 24 September 2026; installations of more than 600,000 in 2025, up 11%; China 354,000; stock 5 million; forecast 655,000 in 2026 and 806,000 in 2029). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  27. 2International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Global Robot Demand in Factories Doubles Over 10 Years (World Robotics 2025 press release, Frankfurt, 25 September 2025; installations 542,000 in 2024; stock 4,664,000; forecast about 575,000 for 2025). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  28. 3International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Robot Density Surges in Europe, Asia and Americas (press release, 8 April 2026; 2024 density: South Korea 1,220, Singapore 818, China 166, global average 132 robots per 10,000 employees). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  29. 5Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (ed.), Waymo’s driverless cars crash less often than people (news release, 23 July 2026; about 50 million driverless miles, 2021 to 2024; 68% lower crash involvement; 81% fewer injury crashes per mile; four cities). IIHS, Arlington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  30. 13Counterpoint Research (ed.), Global Humanoid Robot Installations Reach 16,000 Units in 2025 as Mass Production Picks Pace (release of 14 January 2026; China above 80%; the page does not describe the method). Analyst estimate, weak evidence. Counterpoint Research, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  31. 14Amazon (ed.), announcement of its one millionth robot and the DeepFleet coordination model (company page; more than 300 facilities; 10% travel-time improvement stated as a projection; the page gives no date, coverage places it in July 2025). Company statement, weak evidence. Amazon, Seattle. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  32. 15Engadget (ed.), Boston Dynamics unveils production-ready version of Atlas robot at CES 2026 (report of 8 January 2026; first customers Hyundai and Google DeepMind; Hyundai plans car-plant use from 2028). Trade press reporting a company plan, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  33. 21Adamas Intelligence (ed.), Musk on rare earth export restrictions: Optimus was affected (article of 24 April 2025; Tesla first-quarter 2025 earnings call; arm actuators use permanent magnets). Trade analysis reporting a company statement, weak evidence. Adamas Intelligence, Toronto. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  34. 26Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (ed.), 2026 AI Index Report, summary page (chapter on technical performance covers robotics; the page gave no robotics figures). Stanford HAI, Stanford. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  35. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: Omdia estimate of humanoid shipments in 2025 (about 13,000 units, largest supplier about 5,168 units), taken from a search summary of a news report of 8 January 2026. Analyst estimate. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  36. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: Unitree company claim of more than 5,500 humanoid robots shipped in 2025, taken from a search summary of a news report. Company claim, weak evidence. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  37. 4Waymo (ed.), Safety Impact hub (page read November 2026; 271.3 million rider-only miles through June 2026; about 95% fewer serious-injury-or-worse crashes than a human benchmark). Company-reported analysis, weak evidence. Waymo, Mountain View. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

The 2027 agenda

Eight bounded questions open the 2027 robotics agenda. Each comes from a baseline finding, names the initiative that will carry it and the first output due in the 2027 robotics edition.

5 min read0 figures6 tables3 notesNR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

7.1Questions for the operational series

  1. R-01

    What field safety and incident data exist for robots outside road vehicles, and can they be compared?

    INI-XT03-SAF-01 · field safety evidence; first output: incident data map.

  2. R-02

    How exposed are robot actuators to rare earth magnet supply, and which platforms use alternatives?

    INI-XT03-MAG-02 · magnet and actuator supply; first output: dependence map.

  3. R-03

    Where are humanoid robots deployed in workplaces, under which safety rules?

    INI-XT03-HUM-03 · humanoid deployment register; first output: deployment register.

  4. R-04

    What do recent studies show about robot adoption and local employment and wages?

    INI-XT03-LAB-04 · workforce evidence; first output: evidence review.

  5. R-05

    How can learned-control claims be compared on a common basis?

    INI-XT03-BMK-05 · claims on a common basis; first output: benchmark table.

  6. R-06

    Which national rules set safety duties for autonomous machines, and how do they differ?

    To be admitted in 2027; first output: rule overlay.

  7. R-07

    What energy and battery demand do robot fleets place on facilities and grids?

    To be admitted in 2027; first output: scoping note.

  8. R-08

    Which readiness capabilities have been tested with real robot incidents, and which are only planned?

    Readiness capability register; first output: rung evidence for 15 functions.

7.2Portfolio proposed for the Q1 2027 alignment

Five initiatives and one Universe mission candidate are proposed for the 2027 robotics portfolio. They are programme objects: no partner, funder or member is attached to them in this edition.

Table 7.1Objects proposed for the first operational quarter
IDObjectKindQuestionState
INI-XT03-SAF-01Field safety evidenceInitiativeR-01PROPOSED
INI-XT03-MAG-02Magnet and actuator supplyInitiativeR-02PROPOSED
INI-XT03-HUM-03Humanoid deployment registerInitiativeR-03PROPOSED
INI-XT03-LAB-04Workforce evidenceInitiativeR-04PROPOSED
INI-XT03-BMK-05Claims on a common basisInitiativeR-05PROPOSED
MSN-XT03-2027-01Humanoid pilot Universe missionMissionR-03Candidate

7.3The pathway

The robotics edition reads national readiness chapters, the coupled sector reports on energy, minerals and infrastructure, and the global edition through one governed evidence graph. At baseline the federation is designed; the global energy and lifeline editions are drafted. This page states what exists today and what comes next.

  1. 01

    National readiness chapters

    robot adoption and safety readiness in each national edition

    IN PREPARATION · national baselines

  2. 02

    Sector couplings

    GS-02 energy · GS-09 infrastructure · SR-04 minerals

    GS-02 DRAFTED · sector baselines

  3. 03

    Technology system model

    fleets, learned control, actuators, workforce, governance

    v0 SPECIFIED · v1 with federation evidence

  4. 04

    Strategic links

    SR-02 lifeline systems · SR-13 strategic technology

    PLANNED · strategic baselines

  5. 05

    Universe

    annual proving environment

    CANDIDATE MISSION · mandate in 2027

  6. 06

    XT-03 report

    this series

    BASELINE DRAFT · 2027 annual edition

  7. 07

    Evidence and correction

    one graph, many projections

    OPEN · first correction cycle in 2027

7.4Universe 2027: evidence pack for the robotics candidate mission

  1. 01

    Mandate

  2. 02

    Core Build · 1 month

  3. 03

    Action · 1 week

  4. 04

    Evidence seal

  5. 05

    Portfolio correction

  6. 06

    Next mandate

Table 7.2Universe 2027: evidence pack for the robotics candidate mission
ItemRecordStateTiming
F1Annual mandate recordPLANNEDafter the Q2 2027 alignment
F2Core Build recordPLANNEDone month before the exercise
F3Exercise evidencePLANNEDduring the Action week
F4Decision packetsPLANNEDexercise state only
F5Proof receiptsPLANNEDscoped to each recorded check
F6After-action reportPLANNEDwithin one quarter
F7Upgrade docketPLANNEDrouted to the Portfolio
F8Portfolio renewalPLANNED2027 global annual edition
F9Public synthesisPLANNEDpublic-safe extracts only

Mission

ID
MSN-XT03-2027-01 · Humanoid pilot Universe mission
Role spine
Leadership sponsor · Institutional anchor · Mission lead: drawn from national pathways
Receiving actors
to be identified with the mandate

7.5Handoffs and routing

Where the baseline’s findings go next. A handoff routes a finding for awareness, review or work; it transfers no authority.

Table 7.3Handoffs and routing
FindingRouted toPurposeClass
INF-001 · fleet statisticsINI-XT03-BMK-05claims on a common basisPUBLIC
INF-002 · robot densityINI-XT03-LAB-04workforce evidencePUBLIC
AIC-003 · pooled robot dataINI-XT03-BMK-05claims on a common basisPUBLIC
INF-007 · road vehicle studyINI-XT03-SAF-01field safety evidencePUBLIC
GOV-008 · EU rulesregional consortiarule overlayPUBLIC
GOV-009 · UN vehicle rulesregional consortiarule overlayPUBLIC
MIN-011 · magnetsINI-XT03-MAG-02magnet and actuator supplyPUBLIC
SYS-012 · compound pathwayMSN-XT03-2027-01Universe candidateCONSORTIUM
Table 7.4Routing rules by publication class
ClassWhere it goesWho can see it
PUBLICthe published edition and its evidence bundleanyone
CONSORTIUMgoverned rooms of the federationconsortium members under agreement
CONTROLLEDneed-to-know channelsnamed competent actors only

7.6Feeds and signal register

Table 7.5Feeds watched from 2027
FeedProducerLatencyFeeds into
IFR press releases and statisticsInternational Federation of RoboticsannualINF-001
Preprint servers on robot learningpreprints and peer reviewcontinuousAIC-003
EU machinery and AI Act pagesEuropean Commission and EU-OSHAper releaseGOV-008
UN vehicle forum documentsUNECEper sessionGOV-009
Crash reporting dataNHTSAmonthlyINF-007
Company robot announcementscompaniesper eventINF-006
Rare earth and magnet noticesministries and analystsper eventMIN-011

Escalation routes

  • none · keep monitoring
  • research question
  • project
  • risk object
  • annual publication
  • signal report
Table 7.6Signals at baseline
IDSignalCorroborationSystemsRoute
SIG-XT03-001Industrial robot installations passed 600,000 in 20251CORROBORATEDINF · TRDresearch question R-05
SIG-XT03-002Rare earth magnet licensing affected a humanoid programme21PARTIALMIN · INFinitiative R-02
SIG-XT03-003Company statement on one million warehouse robots14PARTIALINFresearch question R-01

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Five Million Robots now Operate in Factories Globally (World Robotics 2026 press release, Frankfurt, 24 September 2026; installations of more than 600,000 in 2025, up 11%; China 354,000; stock 5 million; forecast 655,000 in 2026 and 806,000 in 2029). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 21Adamas Intelligence (ed.), Musk on rare earth export restrictions: Optimus was affected (article of 24 April 2025; Tesla first-quarter 2025 earnings call; arm actuators use permanent magnets). Trade analysis reporting a company statement, weak evidence. Adamas Intelligence, Toronto. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 14Amazon (ed.), announcement of its one millionth robot and the DeepFleet coordination model (company page; more than 300 facilities; 10% travel-time improvement stated as a projection; the page gives no date, coverage places it in July 2025). Company statement, weak evidence. Amazon, Seattle. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Systems in depth

One section per system: its state at evidence close, its exposures and what the operational series will watch.

11 min read0 figures5 tables34 notesNR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

8.1Fleets, platforms and learned control

Industrial robots are an established fleet. Humanoid and learned-control platforms are new, and evidence for them rests on preprints, analyst estimates and company statements.

>600thousand

industrial robots installed, 20251

5million

operational stock, 20251

22robot types

pooled in one open dataset8

Table 8.1State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Industrial robotsinstallations up 11% in 2025; stock 5 million12Reported
Generalist policiespooled data and shared policies published; company papers report vision-language-action models7891011Reported
Household tasksa benchmark of 1,000 activities states that long-horizon tasks remain hard1226Reported
Humanoid platformsabout 16,000 installations in 2025 by one estimate; production started at one company13152728Reported

Couplings

  • AIC → INF learned control
  • INF ↔ FIN fleets and finance
  • MIN → INF actuators

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • humanoid shipments on a common basis
  • service and professional robot volumes

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • GS-09 Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • XT-01 Artificial Intelligence and Agentic Systems
  • XT-16 Advanced Energy Storage

8.2Energy, batteries and compute at the edge

Robot fleets draw power and need batteries and onboard computing. No figure for energy use or battery supply was found in the sources read.

5million

industrial robots in operation, 20251

>300facilities

Amazon robot network, company statement14

0figures bound

robot energy use and battery supply: not bound

Table 8.2State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Energy usenot published on a common basis for robot fleets14Expert input
Battery supplynot bound; storage is covered in a separate edition1Expert input
Fleet coordinationa company projects a 10% gain in fleet travel time; not independently verified14Reported
Onboard computenot bound in this edition10Expert input

Couplings

  • ENE ↔ INF facility power
  • AIC → INF onboard computing
  • INF → CLI footprint

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • fleet energy and battery demand
  • onboard compute demand

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • GS-09 Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • XT-01 Artificial Intelligence and Agentic Systems
  • XT-16 Advanced Energy Storage

8.3Actuators, magnets and supply chain

Compact high-torque actuators depend on permanent magnets. Export licensing on rare earth elements and magnets from April 2025 affected one humanoid programme, according to its company.

7elements

rare earth elements under licensing, April 202521

59%

China share of robot installations1

55%

Chinese suppliers share of their home market1

Table 8.3State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Rare earth magnetslicensing on seven elements and magnets from April 20252141Reported
Humanoid actuatorsa company said arm actuators use permanent magnets and were affected21Reported
Supply concentrationprocessing and magnet volumes not bound from an opened source3940Expert input
Supplier geographysuppliers from China held 55% of their home market in 20251Reported

Couplings

  • MIN → INF magnets
  • TRD → INF export controls
  • FIN → INF fabrication

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • magnet demand by platform
  • stocks and alternatives

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • GS-09 Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • XT-01 Artificial Intelligence and Agentic Systems
  • XT-16 Advanced Energy Storage

8.4Economy, labour and workforce

Fleet statistics are strong and labour evidence is old. The labour study read covers US adoption from 1990 to 2007.

0.18 to 0.34points

fall in the employment-to-population ratio per robot per 1,000 workers20

0.25 to 0.5%

fall in wages per robot per 1,000 workers20

1million

Amazon robots, company statement14

Table 8.4State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
Employment effectsone study of 1990 to 2007 finds negative local effects per robot per 1,000 workers20Reported
Occupational exposurejournal analyses of automation exposure exist; not bound here4344Expert input
Fleet operatorsone company describes a fleet of one million robots14Reported
Surgical robotsuse reported in one company filing; not bound from an opened source29Expert input

Couplings

  • INF → FIN labour demand
  • FIN → DAT adjustment records
  • HLT → INF workforce

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • recent labour effects
  • workforce size and skills gaps

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • GS-09 Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • XT-01 Artificial Intelligence and Agentic Systems
  • XT-16 Advanced Energy Storage

8.5Safety, rules and governance watch

Rules for robots are arriving unevenly. Machinery and vehicle rules are being set in 2026 and 2027, standards for legged robots are in draft, and the UN has voted on autonomous weapons.

20January 2027

EU Machinery Regulation applies17

24June 2026

UN regulation for automated driving systems adopted22

164votes

UN resolution on autonomous weapons, 202518

Table 8.5State at baseline
ComponentStateEvidenceStatus
MachineryEU Machinery Regulation applies from 20 January 2027 and covers autonomous mobile machinery1735Reported
AI Actthe EU AI Act treats AI-based safety components of products as high-risk, with revised dates1636Reported
Road vehiclesUN GTR 26 and UN Regulation 185 adopted; US crash reporting order in force222330Reported
Weapons and dronesUN vote 164 to 6; US weapons directive reissued in 2023; FAA drone rule pending1819242538Reported

Couplings

  • GOV → INF placing on the market
  • GOV → TRD export controls
  • INF → DAT incident records

Evidence to bind in 2027

  • text of national rules
  • incident data outside road vehicles

Related editions

  • GLB Global Systems
  • GS-02 Energy
  • GS-09 Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics
  • SR-04 Critical Minerals and Strategic Materials
  • XT-01 Artificial Intelligence and Agentic Systems
  • XT-16 Advanced Energy Storage

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Five Million Robots now Operate in Factories Globally (World Robotics 2026 press release, Frankfurt, 24 September 2026; installations of more than 600,000 in 2025, up 11%; China 354,000; stock 5 million; forecast 655,000 in 2026 and 806,000 in 2029). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 8Open X-Embodiment Collaboration, Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models, arXiv:2310.08864, submitted 13 October 2023, revised 14 May 2025 (22 robots, 21 institutions). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 2International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Global Robot Demand in Factories Doubles Over 10 Years (World Robotics 2025 press release, Frankfurt, 25 September 2025; installations 542,000 in 2024; stock 4,664,000; forecast about 575,000 for 2025). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 7Brohan, A. et al., RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control, arXiv:2307.15818, submitted 28 July 2023 (company authors; 6,000 evaluation trials). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 9Black, K. et al., pi0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control, arXiv:2410.24164, submitted 31 October 2024, revised 8 January 2026 (company preprint). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 10Gemini Robotics Team, Gemini Robotics: Bringing AI into the Physical World, arXiv:2503.20020, submitted 25 March 2025 (company preprint; learning of short-horizon tasks from as few as 100 demonstrations). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 11Octo Model Team, Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy, arXiv:2405.12213, submitted 20 May 2024 (800,000 trajectories from Open X-Embodiment; nine robot platforms). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 12Li, C. et al., BEHAVIOR-1K: A Human-Centered, Embodied AI Benchmark with 1,000 Everyday Activities and Realistic Simulation, arXiv:2403.09227, submitted 14 March 2024 (abstract page; 1,000 activities, 50 scenes). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 26Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (ed.), 2026 AI Index Report, summary page (chapter on technical performance covers robotics; the page gave no robotics figures). Stanford HAI, Stanford. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 13Counterpoint Research (ed.), Global Humanoid Robot Installations Reach 16,000 Units in 2025 as Mass Production Picks Pace (release of 14 January 2026; China above 80%; the page does not describe the method). Analyst estimate, weak evidence. Counterpoint Research, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 15Engadget (ed.), Boston Dynamics unveils production-ready version of Atlas robot at CES 2026 (report of 8 January 2026; first customers Hyundai and Google DeepMind; Hyundai plans car-plant use from 2028). Trade press reporting a company plan, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: Omdia estimate of humanoid shipments in 2025 (about 13,000 units, largest supplier about 5,168 units), taken from a search summary of a news report of 8 January 2026. Analyst estimate. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: Unitree company claim of more than 5,500 humanoid robots shipped in 2025, taken from a search summary of a news report. Company claim, weak evidence. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 14Amazon (ed.), announcement of its one millionth robot and the DeepFleet coordination model (company page; more than 300 facilities; 10% travel-time improvement stated as a projection; the page gives no date, coverage places it in July 2025). Company statement, weak evidence. Amazon, Seattle. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 21Adamas Intelligence (ed.), Musk on rare earth export restrictions: Optimus was affected (article of 24 April 2025; Tesla first-quarter 2025 earnings call; arm actuators use permanent magnets). Trade analysis reporting a company statement, weak evidence. Adamas Intelligence, Toronto. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (ed.), announcement of export controls on seven rare earth elements and related magnets, April 2025, taken from a search summary. MOFCOM, Beijing. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026, the page returned an access error; no figure used. International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Geological Survey (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, rare earths, the file returned an access error; no figure used. USGS, Reston. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 20Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P., Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets, NBER Working Paper 23285, March 2017 (US adoption 1990 to 2007). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 43UNVERIFIED, not opened: Autor, D.H., Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation, Journal of Economic Perspectives 29(3), 3 to 30, 2015, cited from memory. Observation year 2015. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 44UNVERIFIED, not opened: Frey, C.B. and Osborne, M.A., The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114, 254 to 280, 2017, cited from memory. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 29UNVERIFIED, not opened: Intuitive Surgical, Form 10-K for fiscal year 2025 (da Vinci procedure growth and installed base), taken from a search summary; the filing was fetched but the section was not read. Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 17European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (ed.), Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 on machinery, legislation page (applies from 20 January 2027; replaces Directive 2006/42/EC; aims to cover autonomous mobile machinery and artificial-intelligence safety modules). EU-OSHA, Bilbao. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  24. 22Connected Automated Driving (ed.), UNECE adopts first-ever global rules allowing fully autonomous vehicles (page of 8 July 2026; adopted 24 June 2026; safety-case approach; about 90 existing UN regulations amended). Trade summary of a UN decision, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  25. 18United Nations General Assembly, resolution A/RES/80/57, Lethal autonomous weapons systems, adopted 1 December 2025 (164 in favour, 6 against, 7 abstentions), vote record page. United Nations, New York. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  26. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2023 on machinery, Official Journal of the European Union; the official page returned no content, summary read through the EU-OSHA page. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  27. 16European Commission (ed.), AI Act, regulatory framework page (entered into force 1 August 2024; high-risk dates revised by an omnibus in force 27 July 2026; AI-based safety components of products such as surgical robots treated as high-risk). Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  28. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence, Official Journal of the European Union, 2024, cited from memory; summary read through the Commission page. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  29. 23Bennett Jones (ed.), First Global Regulatory Framework For Autonomous Vehicles (law-firm blog, August 2026; GTR No. 26 and UN Regulation No. 185; SAE levels 3 to 5; legal status of each). Secondary legal commentary, weak evidence. Bennett Jones, Toronto. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  30. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (ed.), Standing General Order 2021-01 on crash reporting, Third Amended order of 24 April 2025, taken from a search summary; the agency page returned an access error. NHTSA, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  31. 19International Committee of the Red Cross (ed.), ICRC position on autonomous weapon systems (Geneva, 12 May 2021; recommends prohibiting unpredictable systems and systems that target people, and regulating the rest). ICRC, Geneva. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  32. 24Lawfare (ed.), Defense Department Updates Autonomous Weapons Systems Directive (article of 27 January 2023; directive reissued effective 25 January 2023; working group established; criteria not changed). Lawfare Institute, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  33. 25UAV Coach (ed.), FAA Says Part 108 Is on the 10-Yard Line, but the BVLOS Rule Is Still Stuck at the White House (article of 16 September 2026; final rule sent to OIRA on 10 July 2026; FAA hopes to publish before the end of 2026). Trade press, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  34. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Department of Defense (ed.), Directive 3000.09, Autonomy in Weapon Systems, 25 January 2023, text returned an access error; summary read through a news article. DoD, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Methodology

How the edition was made: methods, the model card, the evidence cut and its age, the acceptance record and the glossary.

14 min read0 figures13 tables23 notesNR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

A.1Methods

The global baseline uses published values and four simple derivations. Each is shown in full so that any reader can reproduce it.

Table A.1Methods
No.DerivationCalculationResult
(1)Installations in 2025 against the 2025 forecast600,000 ÷ 575,000at least 1.04, about 4% above
(2)Installations outside China in 2025, floor600,000 − 354,000about 246,000
(3)Difference between US and Japan installations in 202538,500 − 36,219about 2,300
(4)Stock growth implied by rounded figures5,000,000 ÷ 4,664,000about 1.07, against 9% reported
Table A.2Coupling strength scale (matrix and model card)
StrengthDefinition
STRONGa disruption in the source system has historically changed the target system’s service or output within one season, in more than one region
MODERATEan effect is documented but buffered or slower
WEAKan effect is plausible but not documented at global scale
Table A.3Status grammar
LabelRule
Reportedvalue as issued by its source, with year
Inferredreasoned from cited evidence; never a measurement
EstimatedNexus analytical value with stated method
Scenarioconditional on stated assumptions
Expert inputstructured editorial judgement awaiting evidence

A.2Model card, Robotics System Model v0

Model ID
MDL-XT03-ROBOTICS · v0.1
Purpose
represent robots and autonomous systems as infrastructure coupled to energy, magnets and minerals, finance, workforce, safety rules and security
Family
graph-based system of systems
Inputs
the cited sources of this edition; no proprietary data
Method
expert-specified coupling strengths (STRONG · MODERATE · WEAK) from assessments and analogue events
Validation
none yet, first validation against federation evidence in 2027
Uncertainty
qualitative; strengths are hypotheses, not measurements
Domain of validity
global scale; not for asset-, site- or country-level use
Reproducibility
strength table and sources published in this edition
20couplings

typed in v0

0strong

documented within one season

0moderate

documented, buffered

20weak

plausible, undocumented

A.3The baseline evidence cut

Every Nexus edition is published from a frozen evidence cut. The global baseline cut is documentary: it pins the exact edition of every source cited. Federation cuts begin with the first national Foundry cuts in 2027.

Cut ID
DC-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-B0
Type
baseline documentary cut
Resolution policy
pinned · as of 30 September 2026
Sources pinned
46 cited sources, each at the edition and access date in the references
Model runs
none at baseline, analytical values are stated with their method
Digest
computed at freeze and recorded in the publication record
Supersedes
nothing, first cut of the series
Superseded by
the 2027 robotics annual cut

Lineage

  1. 01

    source edition

  2. 02

    pinned citation

  3. 03

    finding

  4. 04

    page

  5. 05

    publication record

Table A.4From the baseline cut to the federation cut
ElementBaseline 20262027 global annual
Sourcescited global publications, pinned by editionnational, regional and sector cuts through one graph
Analysisstated methods and editorial estimatestyped analysis specifications
ModelsRobotics System Model v0 specificationmodel runs with receipts
Findingstwelve baseline findingsfindings re-bound to federation evidence
Reviewfive passes scheduledfive passes on the exact digest

A.4Evidence age and coverage

A 2026 global edition rests on evidence observed in many different years. This page shows each time base, so that no single year label hides older evidence.

Table A.5Evidence age and coverage
IndicatorObservedReleasedCadenceNext release
Industrial robot installations2025Sep 2026annualnext World Robotics report
Robot density2024Apr 2026annualnext density release
Road vehicle safety study2021 to 2024Jul 2026one-offfollow-up studies
Humanoid installations2025Jan 2026annualnext estimate
Machinery Regulation2023applies Jan 2027one-offharmonised standards list
UN vehicle regulation2026Jun 2026periodicnational implementation
Labour effects1990 to 2007Mar 2017one-offnew studies
Magnet licensing2025Apr 2025per eventmonthly
Table A.6Coverage by system at baseline
SystemCoverageThinnest dimension
FleetsGOODservice and professional robot volumes
Learned controlPARTIALclaims on a common basis
Road vehiclesPARTIALcontinuous independent monitoring
HumanoidsTHINshipments on a common basis
GovernancePARTIALrule text and dates
SupplyTHINmagnet volumes and stocks
EnergyTHINfleet energy and battery demand
WorkforceTHINrecent labour effects
Table A.7Designed empty states: what is not bound, what would fill it and why
FieldSource that would fill itBlocker
Energy and battery demand of robot fleetsoperators, vendors, national laboratories, peer-reviewed footprint studiesnot published on a common basis; none retrieved
Rare earth magnet demand by robot platform and stocksIEA Critical Minerals Outlook 202639; USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries40both pages returned an access error and were not opened
Humanoid shipments on a common basiscompany filings and independent auditsanalyst estimates differ and company claims are unverified132728
Service and professional robot volumesIFR service robot release42; IFR trends page46only the headline was seen; the release was not opened
Surgical robot procedures from the filing itselfIntuitive 10-K for 202529the filing was fetched but the relevant section was not reached; figures come from search summaries and are not used
NHTSA Standing General Order current textNHTSA order pages30the agency page returned an access error; a later amendment may exist
Text of ISO 10218-1:2025 and of the draft ISO 25785-1ISO catalogue pages3132catalogue pages returned an access error; dates come from search summaries
Official text of the EU Machinery RegulationOfficial Journal of the European Union35the page returned no content; only the EU-OSHA summary was read17
Details of the UN global technical regulation and UN Regulation 185UNECE documents22two secondary pages were read; the regulation texts were not
FAA final rule on flights beyond visual line of sightFederal Register2537the rule was unpublished at the evidence close; status comes from trade press
Humanoid company plans from the companiesinvestor materials and company releases1545one trade report read; the investor figures were not opened
Recent labour effects of robot adoptionnational statistics, peer-reviewed studiesonly a study of 1990 to 2007 was read20
Field incident data outside road vehiclesregulators, operators, sector bodiesno consolidated series found
Capability rungs beyond standards and planningagencies, operators, laboratoriesnot reviewed

A.5Evidence cards, two anchor sources

Issued by the International Federation of Robotics on 24 September 2026. Annual. Role: binds INF-001 and the fleet tiles. Coverage: industrial robots worldwide, survey of suppliers.

EVD-XT03-001

Industrial robot installations and operational stock, World Robotics 2026 release1

Issued by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety on 23 July 2026. One-off. Role: binds INF-007. Coverage: four US cities, 2021 to 2024, one operator.

EVD-XT03-002

Driverless vehicle crash comparison, IIHS study5

Table A.8Quality dimensions at baseline
DimensionEVD-XT03-001EVD-XT03-002
Completenessindustrial robots only; 2025 total given as a floorone operator; four cities; about 50 million miles
Timelinessabout 9 months after year endabout 2 years after the data period
Revisionstock growth differs from rounded figuressingle study
Method transparencysurvey method summarised in the releasemethod described; crash data limits stated
External validationfederation reviewinstitute review of NHTSA reports

Evidence cards to follow in 2027

  • International Federation of Robotics1: exact totals and the service robot series
  • Waymo4: independent audit of mileage and crash counts
  • European Union35: official text of the Machinery Regulation
  • UNECE22: text of the global technical regulation

A.6Publication acceptance record

Editorial self-check at evidence close. Every applicable item carries a disposition; the remaining items are review, approval and deposit.

Table A.9Publication acceptance record
GroupAreaItemsPassN/APending
D1Identity and scope8800
D2Source and data12912
D3Analysis and models12381
D4Findings and claims9801
D5Figures, tables, maps10622
D6Editorial and citations10802
D7Review and approval130013
D8Artefact and design12705
D9Registry and release9009

Publication gate

Conditions met
14 of 23 at evidence close
Blocking problems
none recorded
Open conditions
reviews, approval of the exact digest, deposit, registry pointer

Not applicable at baseline

Model runs
first runs in Q1 2027
Maps
plates in Q2 2027
Waivers
none

A.7Status words

Table A.10The status every value carries
StatusWhat it means
ObservedMeasured directly and published by the source.
ReportedPublished statistics of an official or institutional source.
DeclaredStated by the body concerned; not independently measured.
EstimatedA Nexus estimate from cited evidence, with its method in Annex A.
ModelledProduced by a stated model from cited inputs.
InferredReasoned from cited evidence; not measured.
ForecastA projection by the cited source.
SimulatedA simulation result under stated assumptions.
ScenarioA conditional statement under stated assumptions; never a prediction.
Expert inputExpert judgement, recorded with its basis.
CandidateProposed for a later edition; not yet evidence.
Evidence-quality levels (EQL 1 to 5) grade the source behind a value; they are not a score of the subject.

A.8How the edition is made, released and corrected

Every edition is built from a sealed evidence cut, reviewed under three keys, signed and deposited before any site shows it as published; corrections go to Nexus Standards as change proposals and feed the next cut.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Evidence arrives from the pillarsFoundry seals observations and indicator series, Universe hands over after-action and scenario findings, and contributions are screened at every gateway, including this site’s.
02 The cut is sealedOn the cut date the evidence is pinned under one identifier, so anyone can rebuild the edition from exactly what it was built on.
03 The edition is assembledThe edition is drafted from its template and content pack. Agents may draft; they never publish and never decide.
04 The keys turnAt the publisher of record the truth key comes first: every value is checked against its source or stated method before the meaning and capital keys turn. No edition moves on until every key has been turned by a named steward.
05 The gate opensA named approver releases one exact digest of the edition; any change after this point is a new version, never a silent edit.
06 Signed and depositedThe PDF, the web edition and the data bundle are signed together with a manifest and an RO-Crate description, and deposited on Zenodo with a concept and a version DOI.
07 Published on its desk’s siteOnly then does the edition show as published on its desk’s Reports site, and the Collection lists it as a part.
08 Corrections go to StandardsMethod and correction findings go to Nexus Standards as change proposals; citations, corrections and new contributions feed the next evidence cut.

A teaching model of the process, not a forecast and not a record of any run; dates and counts on this page come from the programme record. Sources: Reports governance at GCRI Canada (2026); Zenodo, repository of record for Reports deposits (2026).

Lifecycle, one state at a time: Draft, Computed, Evidence bound, Reviewed, Approved for release, Published, Corrected, Superseded. This edition is a draft.

A.9Glossary and abbreviations

Table A.11Series terms
TermMeaning
Baseline Editionthe inaugural annual edition that fixes the reference state for the series
WEFH+Bwater, energy, food, health and biodiversity, the national nexus core
Couplinga typed dependency through which one system transmits to another
Protection gapthe share of losses not covered by insurance
Capability ladderLISTED → EXISTS → ADEQUATE → TESTED → DEMONSTRATED
EQLevidence-quality level, 1–5
Evidence cuta frozen resolution of exact sources and versions
NNC · NLC · NWGNational Nexus Consortium · National Leadership Council · National Working Groups
Table A.12Abbreviations used in this edition
AbbreviationExpansion
ADSautomated driving system
BVLOSbeyond visual line of sight
FAAUS Federal Aviation Administration
GTRglobal technical regulation
IFRInternational Federation of Robotics
IIHSInsurance Institute for Highway Safety
ISOInternational Organization for Standardization
NHTSAUS National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
UNECEUnited Nations Economic Commission for Europe
VLAvision-language-action model
WP.29UN World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations
LAWSlethal autonomous weapons systems

A.10Technical annex

Table A.13Technical annex
ItemAnnexContentsStatus
A.1Indicator definitionsthe global indicator set, with units and sourcesIN THIS EDITION
A.2Coupling strengthsthe twenty-cell matrix and its rationaleIN THIS EDITION
A.3Scenario specificationSCN-XT03-HUM-01 assumptions and signpostsIN THIS EDITION
A.4Capability placementsrung evidence for fifteen functionsIN THIS EDITION
A.5Model diagnosticsfirst runs and validation2027
A.6Sensitivity analysesinfluence of coupling strengths2027
A.7Cluster notescards for the major robot fleet and supply clusters2027
A.8Review statementspass-by-pass review recordAT RELEASE

A.1 · indicator definition: robot density

Construct
number of operating industrial robots per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing
Unit
robots per 10,000 employees
Method
federation count of operational stock divided by manufacturing employment
Source
IFR release of 8 April 20263
Uncertainty
not stated on the page read
Known limits
manufacturing only; employment definitions differ between countries

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026, the page returned an access error; no figure used. International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Geological Survey (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, rare earths, the file returned an access error; no figure used. USGS, Reston. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 13Counterpoint Research (ed.), Global Humanoid Robot Installations Reach 16,000 Units in 2025 as Mass Production Picks Pace (release of 14 January 2026; China above 80%; the page does not describe the method). Analyst estimate, weak evidence. Counterpoint Research, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: Omdia estimate of humanoid shipments in 2025 (about 13,000 units, largest supplier about 5,168 units), taken from a search summary of a news report of 8 January 2026. Analyst estimate. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: Unitree company claim of more than 5,500 humanoid robots shipped in 2025, taken from a search summary of a news report. Company claim, weak evidence. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 42UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Global Sales of Professional Service Robots Surge 24% (press release, 2026), only the headline was seen on another page. International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 46UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Top 5 Global Robotics Trends 2026, the page returned an access error; no figure used. International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 29UNVERIFIED, not opened: Intuitive Surgical, Form 10-K for fiscal year 2025 (da Vinci procedure growth and installed base), taken from a search summary; the filing was fetched but the section was not read. Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (ed.), Standing General Order 2021-01 on crash reporting, Third Amended order of 24 April 2025, taken from a search summary; the agency page returned an access error. NHTSA, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Organization for Standardization (ed.), ISO 10218-1:2025 Robots and robotic devices, safety requirements for industrial robots, Part 1 (third edition, published 5 February 2025), taken from a search summary of the catalogue entry. ISO, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 32UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Organization for Standardization (ed.), ISO 25785-1, safety requirements for industrial mobile robots with actively controlled stability, Part 1: Robots, committee draft in preparation, taken from a search summary of the catalogue entry. ISO, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2023 on machinery, Official Journal of the European Union; the official page returned no content, summary read through the EU-OSHA page. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 17European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (ed.), Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 on machinery, legislation page (applies from 20 January 2027; replaces Directive 2006/42/EC; aims to cover autonomous mobile machinery and artificial-intelligence safety modules). EU-OSHA, Bilbao. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  14. 22Connected Automated Driving (ed.), UNECE adopts first-ever global rules allowing fully autonomous vehicles (page of 8 July 2026; adopted 24 June 2026; safety-case approach; about 90 existing UN regulations amended). Trade summary of a UN decision, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  15. 25UAV Coach (ed.), FAA Says Part 108 Is on the 10-Yard Line, but the BVLOS Rule Is Still Stuck at the White House (article of 16 September 2026; final rule sent to OIRA on 10 July 2026; FAA hopes to publish before the end of 2026). Trade press, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  16. 37UNVERIFIED, not opened: Federal Aviation Administration (ed.), Normal Category Rulemaking for Beyond Visual Line of Sight, notice of proposed rulemaking (Part 108), August 2025, taken from a search summary of a law-firm note. FAA, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  17. 15Engadget (ed.), Boston Dynamics unveils production-ready version of Atlas robot at CES 2026 (report of 8 January 2026; first customers Hyundai and Google DeepMind; Hyundai plans car-plant use from 2028). Trade press reporting a company plan, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  18. 45UNVERIFIED, not opened: Hyundai Motor Group plan to build up to 30,000 robots a year by 2028, taken from a search summary of an Axios report of 5 January 2026; the page returned an access error. Company plan, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  19. 20Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P., Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets, NBER Working Paper 23285, March 2017 (US adoption 1990 to 2007). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  20. 1International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Five Million Robots now Operate in Factories Globally (World Robotics 2026 press release, Frankfurt, 24 September 2026; installations of more than 600,000 in 2025, up 11%; China 354,000; stock 5 million; forecast 655,000 in 2026 and 806,000 in 2029). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  21. 5Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (ed.), Waymo’s driverless cars crash less often than people (news release, 23 July 2026; about 50 million driverless miles, 2021 to 2024; 68% lower crash involvement; 81% fewer injury crashes per mile; four cities). IIHS, Arlington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  22. 4Waymo (ed.), Safety Impact hub (page read November 2026; 271.3 million rider-only miles through June 2026; about 95% fewer serious-injury-or-worse crashes than a human benchmark). Company-reported analysis, weak evidence. Waymo, Mountain View. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  23. 3International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Robot Density Surges in Europe, Asia and Americas (press release, 8 April 2026; 2024 density: South Korea 1,220, Singapore 818, China 166, global average 132 robots per 10,000 employees). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Data appendix

The indicator set with its sources, the source registers, the licences of every kind of material and the formats of the edition.

9 min read0 figures8 tables13 notesNR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

B.1The indicator set

Table B.1Global baseline indicator set
IndicatorValueUnitYearStateSource
Industrial robots installed>600thousand2025Reported1
Growth in installations11%2025Reported1
Operational stock of industrial robots5million2025Reported1
Installations in China354thousand2025Reported1
China share of installations59%2025Reported1
Installations in the United States38.5thousand2025Reported1
Installations in Japan36.2thousand2025Reported1
Installations in 2024542thousand2024Reported2
IFR forecast for 2026655thousand2026 planScenario1
Robot density, South Korea1,220per 10,000 employees2024Reported3
Robot density, global average132per 10,000 employees2024Reported3
Robot types in Open X-Embodiment22robot types2023Reported8
Humanoid installations, analyst estimate≈16thousand2025Reported13
Amazon robots deployed, company statement1million2025Reported14
Injury crashes per mile against human drivers−81%2021 to 2024Reported5
UN votes in favour of A/RES/80/57164votes2025Reported18

B.2Global source register

The governed source set behind this edition. Each source keeps its authority, coverage, cadence and role; categories describe origin, not truth.

Domains bound by the register

  • INF
  • AIC
  • TRD
  • MIN
  • GOV
  • FIN
  • DAT
  • ENE
  • HLT
  • WAT
Table B.3Global source register
SourceCategoryCoveragePeriodCadenceRole
IFR World Robotics 2026 release1industry federationworld2025annualinstallations
IFR World Robotics 2025 release2industry federationworld2024annualinstallations
IFR robot density release3industry federationworld2024annualdensity
Waymo safety hub4operatorfour US cities2026quarterlyroad vehicle safety
IIHS study5insurance-institute researchfour US cities2021 to 2024one-offroad vehicle safety
Open X-Embodiment8preprint serverresearch2023one-offrobot data
Counterpoint release13analystworld2025annualhumanoids
EU-OSHA machinery page17EU agencyEU2025continuousrules
UN vote record18intergovernmental bodyworld2025annualweapons policy
NBER working paper20research instituteUnited States1990 to 2007one-offlabour

B.3Regional reading, robotics across ten clusters

Regional plates follow with the regional editions. This page gives the regional reading of robot infrastructure and exposure in table form and ranks no region.

Table B.4Regional reading, robotics across ten clusters
RegionPrincipal hazardsSystems most exposedBaseline evidence
North Americadriverless services; warehouse fleets; humanoid pilotsroad safety, labourIIHS5; IFR1
South Americaearly national programmeslabourregional evidence (not bound)
Europemachinery regulation; AI Actsafety rulesEU-OSHA17; European Commission16
Eurasiaresearch programmes; export controlsresearch, supplyregional evidence (not bound)
Middle East and North Africaearly deploymentslogisticsregional evidence (not bound)
Africaskills and accessworkforceregional evidence (not bound)
South Asiagrowing industrial marketslabour, skillsregional evidence (not bound)
East Asiamost installations; humanoid production; magnet supplysupply, fleetsIFR1; Counterpoint13
ASEANhigh density in one city-statefleets, skillsIFR3
Oceania-Pacificresearch programmesresearch, workforceregional evidence (not bound)

B.4Cluster card: actuator and magnet supply chain

  • supply chain
  • actuators
  • rare earth magnets
  • single point
Systems in view
actuators, motors, humanoid and legged platforms
Defining events
rare earth export licensing from April 202521
Couplings
MIN → INF magnets; TRD → MIN export controls
Capability evidence
alternative designs mentioned in trade press; none documented at scale here
Gaps
magnet volumes by platform; stocks; alternatives
Agenda items
R-02 · R-03

A company chief executive said that arm actuators of a humanoid robot use permanent magnets [21].

SUPPLY

Permanent magnets in actuators

China required export licences for seven rare earth elements and magnets from April 2025 [21] [41].

POLICY

Licensing of seven elements

Whether other platforms avoid these magnets is not documented in the sources read [39] [40].

RESPONSE

Alternatives

B.5How countries appear in the robotics edition

Countries enter the robotics edition through the readiness chapters of their own national editions, on one card grammar. They are read against peer distributions and thresholds, never ranked.

Table B.5How countries appear in the robotics edition
Card fieldWhat it showsSource
WEFH+B stateeach core system against peer distribution bandsnational edition
Couplingsthe national dependency matrixnational edition
Risk objectsthe national risk portfolionational edition
Capability rungsthe national capability laddernational edition
Evidence ageoldest and newest source datesnational source register

Editions in the 2026 Baseline programme

26national

countries and unions

10regional

clusters

16global

flagship and sector

14strategic

systems reports

20frontier

technology reports

How to read a country card

  • Each system is shown against the distribution of its peers, with thresholds where they exist
  • Couplings and risk objects come from the country’s own national edition
  • Capability rungs record evidence, not a judgement of institutions
  • Evidence age is printed, so older national data are visible as such
Table B.6National Baseline Editions in the 2026 programme
WaveCountries and unionsState
W0CanadaISSUED
W1United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, European Union, SwitzerlandPLANNED
W2Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Türkiye, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, Senegal, Kenya, African Union, India, China, Republic of Korea, Indonesia, Singapore, AustraliaPLANNED

B.6Licences

Table B.7Licences of each kind of material
MaterialLicence
TextCC BY 4.0
Dataon the licence of each source; Nexus tables CC BY 4.0
FiguresNexus figures CC BY 4.0; third-party as credited
Mapsboundary source and licence printed on each plate
MetadataCC0 1.0, as Zenodo publishes it
Third-party data, figures and textThe source’s own licence, credited where it is used; never relicensed
Nexus-authored text, tables and figures: CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0). Map plates print their boundary source and licence.

B.7Formats and provenance

Table B.8This edition in every format
FormatKindStateWhat it isIdentifier
Web editionHTMLOn this siteDraft in stewardship review; every value resolves to its source.NR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Print editionPDFAt releaseA4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF, signed with the web edition at release.NR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Indicator dataCSV · JSONOn this site16 indicators with unit, year, status and source; the machine-readable copy ships with the evidence bundle at release.NR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE data release v1
FiguresSVG · PNGOn this site4 on the web edition: headline figure, figure 1.3, coupling instrument, capability ladder.FIG-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-*
SlidesPDFNot recordedNo slide deck is recorded for this edition.
Evidence briefHTML · PDFNot recordedNo evidence brief is recorded for this edition.
Dataset with DOIDataCiteAt releaseConcept and version DOI are minted at deposit; none is recorded yet.

Provenance

Edition pack
The edition’s content pack (JSON), from which the print and web editions are built
Evidence cut
DC-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-B0, closed 30 September 2026
Reproducibility
sourced values cited; analytical values reproducible from stated parameters
Self-check
14 of 23 at evidence close; a fail on any item blocks release
Review
five passes scheduled before release (in Annex C)
Publisher of record
GCRI for the Nexus Consortium
Corrections
Registry correction pathway; upheld corrections are published as notices with a new version

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 1International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Five Million Robots now Operate in Factories Globally (World Robotics 2026 press release, Frankfurt, 24 September 2026; installations of more than 600,000 in 2025, up 11%; China 354,000; stock 5 million; forecast 655,000 in 2026 and 806,000 in 2029). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 2International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Global Robot Demand in Factories Doubles Over 10 Years (World Robotics 2025 press release, Frankfurt, 25 September 2025; installations 542,000 in 2024; stock 4,664,000; forecast about 575,000 for 2025). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 3International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Robot Density Surges in Europe, Asia and Americas (press release, 8 April 2026; 2024 density: South Korea 1,220, Singapore 818, China 166, global average 132 robots per 10,000 employees). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  4. 8Open X-Embodiment Collaboration, Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models, arXiv:2310.08864, submitted 13 October 2023, revised 14 May 2025 (22 robots, 21 institutions). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  5. 13Counterpoint Research (ed.), Global Humanoid Robot Installations Reach 16,000 Units in 2025 as Mass Production Picks Pace (release of 14 January 2026; China above 80%; the page does not describe the method). Analyst estimate, weak evidence. Counterpoint Research, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  6. 14Amazon (ed.), announcement of its one millionth robot and the DeepFleet coordination model (company page; more than 300 facilities; 10% travel-time improvement stated as a projection; the page gives no date, coverage places it in July 2025). Company statement, weak evidence. Amazon, Seattle. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  7. 5Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (ed.), Waymo’s driverless cars crash less often than people (news release, 23 July 2026; about 50 million driverless miles, 2021 to 2024; 68% lower crash involvement; 81% fewer injury crashes per mile; four cities). IIHS, Arlington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  8. 18United Nations General Assembly, resolution A/RES/80/57, Lethal autonomous weapons systems, adopted 1 December 2025 (164 in favour, 6 against, 7 abstentions), vote record page. United Nations, New York. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  9. 4Waymo (ed.), Safety Impact hub (page read November 2026; 271.3 million rider-only miles through June 2026; about 95% fewer serious-injury-or-worse crashes than a human benchmark). Company-reported analysis, weak evidence. Waymo, Mountain View. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  10. 17European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (ed.), Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 on machinery, legislation page (applies from 20 January 2027; replaces Directive 2006/42/EC; aims to cover autonomous mobile machinery and artificial-intelligence safety modules). EU-OSHA, Bilbao. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  11. 20Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P., Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets, NBER Working Paper 23285, March 2017 (US adoption 1990 to 2007). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  12. 16European Commission (ed.), AI Act, regulatory framework page (entered into force 1 August 2024; high-risk dates revised by an omnibus in force 27 July 2026; AI-based safety components of products such as surgical robots treated as high-risk). Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
  13. 21Adamas Intelligence (ed.), Musk on rare earth export restrictions: Optimus was affected (article of 24 April 2025; Tesla first-quarter 2025 earnings call; arm actuators use permanent magnets). Trade analysis reporting a company statement, weak evidence. Adamas Intelligence, Toronto. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

References and record

Every source the edition rests on, the publication record, the corrections log and the open record.

15 min read0 figures1 table0 notesNR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

C.146 sources

NR-CIT-1, editor first. A DOI is linked where the source has one; Nexus records carry a UNI once the catalogue allocates it (NS-1).

  1. 1International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Five Million Robots now Operate in Factories Globally (World Robotics 2026 press release, Frankfurt, 24 September 2026; installations of more than 600,000 in 2025, up 11%; China 354,000; stock 5 million; forecast 655,000 in 2026 and 806,000 in 2029). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  2. 2International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Global Robot Demand in Factories Doubles Over 10 Years (World Robotics 2025 press release, Frankfurt, 25 September 2025; installations 542,000 in 2024; stock 4,664,000; forecast about 575,000 for 2025). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  3. 3International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Robot Density Surges in Europe, Asia and Americas (press release, 8 April 2026; 2024 density: South Korea 1,220, Singapore 818, China 166, global average 132 robots per 10,000 employees). International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6
  4. 4Waymo (ed.), Safety Impact hub (page read November 2026; 271.3 million rider-only miles through June 2026; about 95% fewer serious-injury-or-worse crashes than a human benchmark). Company-reported analysis, weak evidence. Waymo, Mountain View. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6
  5. 5Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (ed.), Waymo’s driverless cars crash less often than people (news release, 23 July 2026; about 50 million driverless miles, 2021 to 2024; 68% lower crash involvement; 81% fewer injury crashes per mile; four cities). IIHS, Arlington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6
  6. 6Kusano, K.D. et al., Comparison of Waymo Rider-Only Crash Data to Human Benchmarks at 7.1 Million Miles, arXiv:2312.12675, submitted 20 December 2023, revised 24 October 2024 (authors employed by the operator). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6
  7. 7Brohan, A. et al., RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control, arXiv:2307.15818, submitted 28 July 2023 (company authors; 6,000 evaluation trials). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  8. 8Open X-Embodiment Collaboration, Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models, arXiv:2310.08864, submitted 13 October 2023, revised 14 May 2025 (22 robots, 21 institutions). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  9. 9Black, K. et al., pi0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control, arXiv:2410.24164, submitted 31 October 2024, revised 8 January 2026 (company preprint). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  10. 10Gemini Robotics Team, Gemini Robotics: Bringing AI into the Physical World, arXiv:2503.20020, submitted 25 March 2025 (company preprint; learning of short-horizon tasks from as few as 100 demonstrations). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  11. 11Octo Model Team, Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy, arXiv:2405.12213, submitted 20 May 2024 (800,000 trajectories from Open X-Embodiment; nine robot platforms). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  12. 12Li, C. et al., BEHAVIOR-1K: A Human-Centered, Embodied AI Benchmark with 1,000 Everyday Activities and Realistic Simulation, arXiv:2403.09227, submitted 14 March 2024 (abstract page; 1,000 activities, 50 scenes). arXiv, Ithaca. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  13. 13Counterpoint Research (ed.), Global Humanoid Robot Installations Reach 16,000 Units in 2025 as Mass Production Picks Pace (release of 14 January 2026; China above 80%; the page does not describe the method). Analyst estimate, weak evidence. Counterpoint Research, Hong Kong. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  14. 14Amazon (ed.), announcement of its one millionth robot and the DeepFleet coordination model (company page; more than 300 facilities; 10% travel-time improvement stated as a projection; the page gives no date, coverage places it in July 2025). Company statement, weak evidence. Amazon, Seattle. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  15. 15Engadget (ed.), Boston Dynamics unveils production-ready version of Atlas robot at CES 2026 (report of 8 January 2026; first customers Hyundai and Google DeepMind; Hyundai plans car-plant use from 2028). Trade press reporting a company plan, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 5, chapter 6, chapter 8
  16. 16European Commission (ed.), AI Act, regulatory framework page (entered into force 1 August 2024; high-risk dates revised by an omnibus in force 27 July 2026; AI-based safety components of products such as surgical robots treated as high-risk). Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  17. 17European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (ed.), Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 on machinery, legislation page (applies from 20 January 2027; replaces Directive 2006/42/EC; aims to cover autonomous mobile machinery and artificial-intelligence safety modules). EU-OSHA, Bilbao. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  18. 18United Nations General Assembly, resolution A/RES/80/57, Lethal autonomous weapons systems, adopted 1 December 2025 (164 in favour, 6 against, 7 abstentions), vote record page. United Nations, New York. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 8
  19. 19International Committee of the Red Cross (ed.), ICRC position on autonomous weapon systems (Geneva, 12 May 2021; recommends prohibiting unpredictable systems and systems that target people, and regulating the rest). ICRC, Geneva. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 8
  20. 20Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P., Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets, NBER Working Paper 23285, March 2017 (US adoption 1990 to 2007). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 1, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  21. 21Adamas Intelligence (ed.), Musk on rare earth export restrictions: Optimus was affected (article of 24 April 2025; Tesla first-quarter 2025 earnings call; arm actuators use permanent magnets). Trade analysis reporting a company statement, weak evidence. Adamas Intelligence, Toronto. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 4, chapter 5, chapter 6, chapter 7, chapter 8
  22. 22Connected Automated Driving (ed.), UNECE adopts first-ever global rules allowing fully autonomous vehicles (page of 8 July 2026; adopted 24 June 2026; safety-case approach; about 90 existing UN regulations amended). Trade summary of a UN decision, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  23. 23Bennett Jones (ed.), First Global Regulatory Framework For Autonomous Vehicles (law-firm blog, August 2026; GTR No. 26 and UN Regulation No. 185; SAE levels 3 to 5; legal status of each). Secondary legal commentary, weak evidence. Bennett Jones, Toronto. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  24. 24Lawfare (ed.), Defense Department Updates Autonomous Weapons Systems Directive (article of 27 January 2023; directive reissued effective 25 January 2023; working group established; criteria not changed). Lawfare Institute, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6, chapter 8
  25. 25UAV Coach (ed.), FAA Says Part 108 Is on the 10-Yard Line, but the BVLOS Rule Is Still Stuck at the White House (article of 16 September 2026; final rule sent to OIRA on 10 July 2026; FAA hopes to publish before the end of 2026). Trade press, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 6, chapter 8
  26. 26Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (ed.), 2026 AI Index Report, summary page (chapter on technical performance covers robotics; the page gave no robotics figures). Stanford HAI, Stanford. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6, chapter 8
  27. 27UNVERIFIED, not opened: Omdia estimate of humanoid shipments in 2025 (about 13,000 units, largest supplier about 5,168 units), taken from a search summary of a news report of 8 January 2026. Analyst estimate. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in the summary, chapter 1, chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  28. 28UNVERIFIED, not opened: Unitree company claim of more than 5,500 humanoid robots shipped in 2025, taken from a search summary of a news report. Company claim, weak evidence. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 6, chapter 8
  29. 29UNVERIFIED, not opened: Intuitive Surgical, Form 10-K for fiscal year 2025 (da Vinci procedure growth and installed base), taken from a search summary; the filing was fetched but the section was not read. Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 8
  30. 30UNVERIFIED, not opened: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (ed.), Standing General Order 2021-01 on crash reporting, Third Amended order of 24 April 2025, taken from a search summary; the agency page returned an access error. NHTSA, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  31. 31UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Organization for Standardization (ed.), ISO 10218-1:2025 Robots and robotic devices, safety requirements for industrial robots, Part 1 (third edition, published 5 February 2025), taken from a search summary of the catalogue entry. ISO, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 3, chapter 4, chapter 6
  32. 32UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Organization for Standardization (ed.), ISO 25785-1, safety requirements for industrial mobile robots with actively controlled stability, Part 1: Robots, committee draft in preparation, taken from a search summary of the catalogue entry. ISO, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6
  33. 33UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Organization for Standardization (ed.), ISO 13482:2014 Robots and robotic devices, safety requirements for personal care robots, cited from memory. ISO, Geneva. Observation year 2014. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  34. 34UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Organization for Standardization (ed.), ISO 3691-4 Industrial trucks, safety requirements and verification, Part 4: Driverless industrial trucks and their systems, cited from memory. ISO, Geneva. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  35. 35UNVERIFIED, not opened: Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2023 on machinery, Official Journal of the European Union; the official page returned no content, summary read through the EU-OSHA page. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  36. 36UNVERIFIED, not opened: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence, Official Journal of the European Union, 2024, cited from memory; summary read through the Commission page. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 6, chapter 8
  37. 37UNVERIFIED, not opened: Federal Aviation Administration (ed.), Normal Category Rulemaking for Beyond Visual Line of Sight, notice of proposed rulemaking (Part 108), August 2025, taken from a search summary of a law-firm note. FAA, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6
  38. 38UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Department of Defense (ed.), Directive 3000.09, Autonomy in Weapon Systems, 25 January 2023, text returned an access error; summary read through a news article. DoD, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6, chapter 8
  39. 39UNVERIFIED, not opened: IEA (ed.), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026, the page returned an access error; no figure used. International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 8
  40. 40UNVERIFIED, not opened: US Geological Survey (ed.), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, rare earths, the file returned an access error; no figure used. USGS, Reston. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 4, chapter 8
  41. 41UNVERIFIED, not opened: Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (ed.), announcement of export controls on seven rare earth elements and related magnets, April 2025, taken from a search summary. MOFCOM, Beijing. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 2, chapter 4, chapter 8
  42. 42UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Global Sales of Professional Service Robots Surge 24% (press release, 2026), only the headline was seen on another page. International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.
  43. 43UNVERIFIED, not opened: Autor, D.H., Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation, Journal of Economic Perspectives 29(3), 3 to 30, 2015, cited from memory. Observation year 2015. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6, chapter 8
  44. 44UNVERIFIED, not opened: Frey, C.B. and Osborne, M.A., The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114, 254 to 280, 2017, cited from memory. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03. Cited in chapter 6, chapter 8
  45. 45UNVERIFIED, not opened: Hyundai Motor Group plan to build up to 30,000 robots a year by 2028, taken from a search summary of an Axios report of 5 January 2026; the page returned an access error. Company plan, weak evidence. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.
  46. 46UNVERIFIED, not opened: International Federation of Robotics (ed.), Top 5 Global Robotics Trends 2026, the page returned an access error; no figure used. International Federation of Robotics, Frankfurt. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.

C.2Publication record

Publication

Title
Exponential Technology Report 2026: Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Baseline Edition
Series
Reports · Exponential Technology Series XT-03
Edition
Baseline Edition 2026 · inaugural annual
Version
v1.0.0 · draft for stewardship review
Publication ID
NR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Evidence close
30 September 2026
Publication date
October 2026
DOI
concept and version DOI at deposit

Publisher

Publisher of record
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), for the Nexus Consortium
Place
Toronto
Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor
Stewards
GCRI · technical truth · GRF · public meaning · GRA · capital meaning
Licence
text CC BY 4.0; data on the terms of each source
Copyright
© 2026 GCRI · Nexus Consortium
Language
English (en-GB) source edition
Correspondence
Registry correction pathway · editorial office

Colophon

Format
A4 portrait · screen, print and archival PDF
Typefaces
Space Grotesk (display) · Geist (text) · IBM Plex Sans Italic (standfirsts) · IBM Plex Mono (data)
Design standard
Reports Foundational Edition, Volume I, Part VII
Accessibility
tagged PDF and HTML targets; text alternatives for every figure
Production
Reports editorial team, GCRI

Release path for this version

Table C.1Release path for this version
StepWhat happensWhen
Drafteditorial self-check complete at evidence closeOctober 2026
Steward reviewfive passes on the exact draft (keys T · M · F · N)Q4 2026
Approvalpublication authority approves the exact digestbefore release
Depositconcept and version DOI minted; registry pointer setat release
Successionthe 2027 robotics edition reports changes against this baseline2027
Current version
v1.0.0 draft, stewardship review
Previous edition
none, first edition of the series
Next edition
NR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2027-v1.0.0
Latest version
resolve the concept DOI or the registry record
Correction route
Registry correction pathway
Notice types
erratum · addendum · supersession · withdrawal

C.3Corrections log

0correction notices. No edition has been released yet, so none can be corrected; the log below lists each edition’s current version.

EditionVersionDateStateChangeNotice
XT-03NR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0October 2026DraftBaseline Edition 2026, inaugural annual edition,None

Notice types: erratum, addendum, supersession, withdrawal. A correction is a new version with a published notice; the earlier version stays resolvable, and no edition is ever edited in silence.

C.4Open record

This edition’s open record

Publication ID
NR-XTECH-ROBOTICS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-v1.0.0
Desk identifier and series alias
NR-XTC-XT-03-2026-BL
Collection
None
DOI
Concept and version DOI at deposit, on Zenodo with DataCite metadata
Versions
Each correction is a new version (isNewVersionOf); the concept DOI resolves to the latest
Bundle
RO-Crate 1.2 with CITATION.cff, CodeMeta and PROV-O provenance; a signed manifest
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (SPDX CC-BY-4.0) for original material; metadata CC0 1.0

Credit and identity

ORCID
Your iD in the deposit and the contribution record; DataCite can then add the work to your ORCID record
ROR
Your organisation by its ROR identifier, never by a typed name alone
CRediT
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualisation, Writing, review and editing
Account
None needed to contribute; never a password

Find and follow

Search the open indexes for Robotics and Autonomous Systems; software is cited by its SWHID from Software Heritage, and a quantified scenario run is preregistered on OSF before it is run. Annotation is your choice: Hypothesis opens this page in its own viewer.

Mirrors and harvest

The DOI is canonical. At release each signed bundle is also given an IPFS content identifier and a bloxberg anchor as mirrors; both are listed in the record once they exist. Zenodo exposes every record over OAI-PMH, and reviews and endorsements can arrive through COAR Notify where the repository supports it.

InvenioRDM metadata for a contribution on Robotics and Autonomous Systems, prefilled from this page
{
  "metadata": {
    "resource_type": {
      "id": "dataset"
    },
    "title": "Evidence on Robotics and Autonomous Systems for Nexus Reports",
    "publication_date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
    "creators": [
      {
        "person_or_org": {
          "type": "personal",
          "family_name": "Your family name",
          "given_name": "Your given name",
          "identifiers": [
            {
              "scheme": "orcid",
              "identifier": "0000-0000-0000-0000"
            }
          ]
        },
        "affiliations": [
          {
            "id": "ROR identifier of your organisation"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "description": "What it is, where its record is kept and how it bears on Exponential Technology Report 2026: Robotics and Autonomous Systems.",
    "rights": [
      {
        "id": "cc-by-4.0"
      }
    ],
    "subjects": [
      {
        "subject": "Nexus Reports"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Robotics and Autonomous Systems"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Exponential Technology Report · XT-03"
      }
    ],
    "related_identifiers": [
      {
        "identifier": "https://therisk.global/nexus-reports/editions/xt-03/",
        "scheme": "url",
        "relation_type": {
          "id": "issupplementto"
        },
        "resource_type": {
          "id": "publication-report"
        }
      }
    ],
    "version": "1.0.0"
  },
  "custom_fields": {},
  "access": {
    "record": "public",
    "files": "public"
  },
  "files": {
    "enabled": true
  },
  "parent": {
    "communities": {
      "default": "nexusreports"
    }
  }
}

C.5Where this edition sits among the six pillars

Foundry seals the evidence and Universe tests it; Reports publishes it; Standards takes its corrections and Academy teaches from it.

  1. F03 Sealed observations and indicator series Foundry Sealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
  2. F04 After-action and scenario findings for Universe After-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
  3. F05 National Portfolio movement for chapter Foundry National Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
  4. Applied in editions Standards Nexus Standards: applied in editions.
  5. XT-03 edition Reports Robotics and Autonomous Systems 2026, published in every format with its sources, citation and corrections.
  6. F06 Method and correction findings as change Standards Method and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
  7. F12 Q4 synthesis informs the next-year Universe Q4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
  8. Taught in the open Academy Risk Academy: taught in the open.

What Foundry and Universe hand to this edition, and what it hands to Standards, Universe and Academy. From the programme spine; XT-03 is a drafted Baseline Edition, so these handoffs run from its first operational quarter.

HandoffBetweenWhat crosses, and when
F03Foundry to ReportsSealed observations and indicator series behind a profile (closeout).
F04Universe to ReportsAfter-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13 (after action review).
F05Foundry to ReportsNational Portfolio movement for chapter 11 (after action review).
RingNexus Standards to ReportsNexus Standards: applied in editions.
F06Reports to Nexus StandardsMethod and correction findings as change proposals (correction).
F12Reports to UniverseQ4 synthesis informs the next-year mandate (renewal).
RingReports to Risk AcademyRisk Academy: taught in the open.
ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Robotics and Autonomous Systems.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the GCRI Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskExponential Technology

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.