Decision analysis under uncertainty provides structured methods for choosing among options when outcomes are uncertain and objectives conflict. It makes trade-offs and value judgements explicit. Systemic Risk Management stewards this page for the Nexus Consortium.
GCRI · Institution · service level R0
Decision analysis under uncertainty provides structured methods for choosing among options when outcomes are uncertain and objectives conflict. Decision analysis helps choose actions that perform acceptably across interconnected risks and uncertain futures. In the Nexus Consortium, Systemic Risk Management stewards its canonical page, and 13 other platforms apply it, including Nexus Campaigns and Nexus Agency.
Where people and networks concentrate, the exposure through which shocks travel between systems, shown for Mexico as an example geography for this subject.
decision trees; multi-criteria decision analysis; value of information analysis; robust decision making; expected utility analysis; adaptive pathways planning.
expert elicitation; model outputs; stakeholder preference surveys; cost and benefit estimates; scenario sets.
Analyses are checked through sensitivity analysis, peer review and stakeholder scrutiny. Retrospective review compares decisions with outcomes.
Results depend on elicited probabilities and preferences that may be biased. Deep uncertainty can make expected value comparisons misleading.
Decision analysis helps choose actions that perform acceptably across interconnected risks and uncertain futures. It clarifies when to act now and when to keep options open.
| Reference | What it sets |
|---|---|
| ISO 31000 risk treatment | Selecting treatment options |
| Robust decision-making and dynamic adaptive pathways | Decisions under deep uncertainty |
| Cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis guidance | Appraisal of options |
Under deep uncertainty, decision analysis seeks options that perform acceptably across many futures and adaptive pathways that can change course as information arrives. It supports decision-makers; it does not replace their judgement on values.
Systemic Risk Management stewards decision analysis under uncertainty: it keeps this description current and reviews how the method is applied across the platforms.
Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Design standard | The hazard level, such as a return period, that infrastructure is built to withstand. |
| Value of further diligence | The expected improvement in a financing decision from more investigation before committing. |
| Pipeline screening | Ranking candidate projects against stated criteria before preparation. |
| Self-sufficiency | A funding position at which a scheme needs no further sponsor support under prudent assumptions. |
The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.
The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.