GCRI · 人工智能与自主系统
劳动与社会影响
AI changes which tasks people do, how work is organised, which skills are valued and how information spreads. Effects differ by occupation, country, gender and age, and depend on how firms and governments choose to deploy it. This page sets out how AI affects work and society, how exposure and impacts are measured, and what evidence serves the labour ministries, employers, unions and educators involved.
Labour and social effects: how the risk develops.
Work, education, public trust and inclusion. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.
Tasks change before jobs do
AI automates or assists specific tasks within occupations. Jobs are reorganised around remaining tasks before they disappear or new ones form.
Exposure is uneven
Clerical and some professional tasks are highly exposed to generative AI, while manual and interpersonal work is less exposed. Women are over-represented in some highly exposed clerical jobs.
Skills and training lag
Workers need new skills to use AI well, and those displaced need retraining. Training 系统 often respond more slowly than technology adoption.
Information ecosystems shift
Generated content, recommendation systems and synthetic media change how people find and judge information, with effects on trust and public debate.
How labour and social effects is modelled, measured and tested.
模型、其假设、数据和不确定性，以科学家或工程师会核查的形式呈现。结构遵循已发表的方法。所取数值仅为示意，不是研究发现。
系统模型
The couplings between the systems in labour and social effects: signs of influence, a reinforcing and a balancing loop, and cross-links where stress jumps.
AI’s effects on work vary across domains.
Labour studies are designed for the 指数级技术系列. The ILO’s 2023 working paper estimates exposure, not job loss, and finds clerical work most exposed.
- Firm-level adoption studies.
- Worker surveys on task change.
衡量什么，以及衡量得如何。
每个指标都注明其单位、频率、背后的来源类型以及数值将附带的证据标签。此处不显示数值：数值由计划依据其自身权限提供。
| 指标 | 单位 | 节奏 | 来源类型 | 标签 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employment in occupations highly exposed to AI | percent of employment | 每次评估 | Exposure studies using occupational data | 估算 |
| Firms using AI | percent of firms | 年度 | Business surveys | 已报告 |
| Workers using AI tools at work | percent of workers | per survey | Labour force and worker surveys | 已报告 |
| AI-related job postings | share of postings | 每月 | Online job posting data | 观测 |
| Participation in AI skills training | percent of workforce | 年度 | Training surveys | 已报告 |
| Wage changes in exposed occupations | percent change | 年度 | Wage statistics | 已发布统计 |
证据来自何处。
具名公共数据集与机构记录，各自注明许可类别。依协议获得的来源仅按其条款使用，绝不再次发布。
| 来源 | 它提供什么 | 许可类别 |
|---|---|---|
| ILO studies on generative AI exposure of occupations | Occupational exposure estimates by country and gender | Public, ILO terms |
| OECD Employment Outlook and AI in work studies | Evidence on AI adoption and labour effects | Public, OECD terms |
| Eurostat ICT usage in enterprises survey | Share of enterprises using AI | Open, Eurostat reuse policy |
| Online job posting data such as Lightcast summaries | Demand for AI skills | Commercial; public summaries (to check) |
| Stanford AI Index | Compiled indicators on AI adoption, investment and labour | Public, licence to check |
由谁决定，以及证据服务于什么。
人工智能与自主 系统 prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.
| 谁来决定 | 问题 | 本页面服务的证据 |
|---|---|---|
| Labour ministries | Which workers and sectors need transition support | Exposure analyses; adoption tracking |
| Employers and unions | How to introduce AI at work and share its gains | Adoption and wage evidence |
| 教育 and training bodies | Which skills to teach and to whom | Skills demand evidence |
该主题产生的产出
- Occupational exposure analyses by sector, gender and region
- Adoption tracking from business and worker surveys
- Evaluation designs for AI training programmes
- Evidence notes for social dialogue on AI at work
What researchers ask about social effects.
- Which tasks can current AI perform well, and how does that map onto occupations?
- Does AI substitute for workers, complement them or change what their jobs consist of?
- How does AI change learning and assessment in education?
- How do errors, opacity and misuse affect trust, and who is excluded?
Tasks, not jobs.
Jobs are bundles of tasks. AI tends to automate or assist specific tasks, such as drafting, summarising, coding or classifying images, which changes the content of jobs rather than simply removing them. Whether that raises productivity and wages or displaces workers depends on how organisations redesign work and how gains are shared.
In education, AI can personalise support but also undermine assessment and the learning that comes from effort. Trust depends on experience: visible errors, unexplained decisions and synthetic content erode it, while accountable use can build it. People with limited digital access, skills or language support risk exclusion.
Evidence on social effects.
- 01
Task exposure analysis
Mapping AI capabilities onto occupational task data. Exposure is not the same as displacement.
- 02
Field and natural experiments
Studying workplaces and classrooms that adopt AI, using 社会与行为科学. Early studies may not generalise.
- 03
Surveys of trust and use
Measuring how people use and perceive AI. Attitudes change quickly and vary by context.
- 04
能力评估
Linking what 系统 can actually do, from AI 评估与保证工程, to claims about social effects.
Where this page’s references lead.
阅读本页时所对照的机构和文件。状态和版本会变化；每个链接都指向发布机构。
问题与解答。
Will AI take jobs?
What is occupational exposure to AI?
Who is most exposed to generative AI?
Will AI cause mass unemployment?
Which workers are most exposed?
How does this topic relate to Future of Work and Skills?
Does the platform advise employers?
从本页贡献证据。
报告 is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- 电子邮件网关 GW-GCRI从本页发送证据、更正、案例、方法、审查、翻译或概况投稿。它会带上本页标签送达，由负责的编辑接收。
- Zenodo开放存缴存缴并提交到社区用您的 ORCID iD 在 Zenodo 上发布您自己的记录，然后提交到那里的 Reports 社区。由策展人审核；DOI 仍归您所有。
- 报告GCRI查看所有贡献方式贡献类型、各自的评审方式、您获得的署名、许可协议，以及绝不接受的内容。
切勿发送个人数据、敏感基础设施细节或您无权分享的任何内容。贡献在使用前会经过审查；发送贡献不赋予署名权或编辑权，赞助也绝不能换取研究结论。
法律文件。
本网站上的地图、数据和图表仅作为背景和一般信息展示。它们不是建议、预测或预警；信息的局限见免责声明和数据说明。