GCRI · PAGE · aiGCRI dossier · service level R0
GCRIFields across the Consortium
Field gateway · Artificial intelligence

Artificial intelligence

AI risk management asks what a system can do, how it fails, who is affected and who is accountable, across a lifecycle where capability can change after deployment and harms can be diffuse.

01In brief

The short answer.

Artificial intelligence as a field of risk covers how AI systems are built, evaluated, deployed and governed, and the safety, security, rights and societal effects that follow from their use. In the Nexus Consortium it is studied as science at GCRI by Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems as well as Future of Work and Skills, governed at GRF by Innovation Nexus as well as AI and Digital Governance, and understood financially at GRA by AI and Financial Model Risk; this gateway links those platforms and the methods they share.

02Geography

Digital demand and connectivity in East Asia.

Urban demand centres and the hubs that anchor digital and data infrastructure, shown for East Asia as an example geography for this subject.

Urban demand centres and the hubs that anchor digital and data infrastructure.Indicator derived from Natural Earth at map scale; a screening view, not an assessment.
GCRI · institution · fieldDESIGN FIGURE
03Three mandates

The field, seen three ways.

04The systemic question

From model failure to systemic effect.

Individual AI failures (biased outputs, hallucinated facts, unsafe actions by an agent) are well catalogued. Systemic effects arise when many actors use similar models trained on similar data, when AI is embedded in critical decisions such as credit or triage, or when capability shifts faster than oversight. Assessment has to cover the model, the system it sits in and the institution operating it.

LayerTypical riskAssessment
ModelRobustness, bias, capability for misuseEvaluations and red teaming
SystemIntegration errors, over-reliance, data leakageImpact assessment, human oversight design
InstitutionUnclear accountability, missing incident responseManagement system audit (ISO/IEC 42001)
EcosystemHomogeneity, concentration, correlated failureMarket and dependency analysis
05Frameworks

Risk frameworks and law.

Framework or bodyWhat it governs or supplies
NIST AI RMF and its generative AI profileGovern, map, measure and manage functions
ISO/IEC 42001 and ISO/IEC 23894AI management systems and AI risk management guidance
EU AI ActRisk-tiered obligations applied in stages; check current dates for each obligation
OECD AI Principles and UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AIIntergovernmental principles
06Couplings

Where AI risk lands.

The science sits on AI and Autonomous Systems; methods start from AI assurance.

08Key terms

Terms used on this page.

Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.

TermDefinition
AI systemA machine-based system that infers from inputs how to generate outputs such as predictions, content or decisions that can influence environments, in OECD usage.
DeployerIn the EU AI Act, a person or organization using an AI system under its authority, distinct from the provider that develops it.
Model riskThe potential for adverse consequences from decisions based on incorrect or misused model outputs, as SR 11-7 describes it.
General-purpose AI modelAn AI model that can perform a wide range of distinct tasks and be integrated into many applications.
10Questions

Questions and answers.

Why does GCRI host field gateways?
GCRI hosts the shared references of the Consortium, including the STEM Commons and the field gateways, so each field has one place that links all three institutions' work.
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Start with an enquiry.

The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

Have questions?