GCRI · Registry

プログラムの状況

A programme status such as planned, active, paused or closed is a short word that readers take as a long claim. They infer funding, staffing, delivery and even results from it, though the word asserts none of these on its own. This page sets out what a status assertion records, who may make and change it, how statuses drift away from the programme they describe, and what a funder, auditor or partner needs to see before relying on one.

01キャンバス

作業の進め方。

システム ・この主題の周辺説明用

記録台帳

Programme status · Registry · Ledger head 4520089

  • 登録済みの記録
    3446
  • 来歴が完全な記録の割合、%
    93平常
  • 未解決の訂正
    15注視
  • 権利の保留
    0情報
完全性チェックに合格GCRI・Registry

最新の記録

NX-R-20740プログラムの状況v23557271登録済み
NX-P-99526公開v19568898登録済み
NX-E-98224エビデンス記録v22471930訂正受付中
NX-C-85422参加v17123058権利による保留

版の履歴

  1. v1NEW情報源とともに登録済み
  2. v2FIX単位を訂正、理由を記録
  3. v3OPEN訂正を請求済み
Record ledger: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Programme status.例示の名称と説明用の値です。設計であり、記録でも稼働中のシステムでもありません。

図Record ledger: example names and illustrative values, not a record or a live system.

02質問

Programme status: how the risk develops.

What a programme state does and does not mean. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

メカニズム

Status outlives its evidence

A status is set at one moment and then left. Staff move, funding lapses or a phase ends, but the record still reads active. Without a review date and a named owner, an unchanged status cannot be told apart from a confirmed one.

メカニズム

Target read as delivery

Registries often hold planned scope beside actual progress. When a design target, a launch announcement or a pilot sits under the same status as an operating service, readers take intention for implementation, and implementation for a verified outcome.

メカニズム

Vocabulary drift

Each partner uses its own words: open, live, ongoing, in delivery. When records are merged without a controlled list and a crosswalk, one status means different things in different rows, and counts across the registry stop being comparable.

メカニズム

Reliance cascades

Funders schedule tranches, partners commit staff and reviewers cite the programme as evidence of capacity, all from the status field. A stale or inflated status therefore travels into budgets, reputations and later audit findings far from where it was entered.

03手法とエビデンス

How programme status is modelled, measured and tested.

モデル、その仮定、データ、不確実性を、科学者やエンジニアが確認する形で示します。構造は公表された手法に従っています。描かれた値は例示であり、知見ではありません。

データセットと来歴

The data classes behind programme status and what is recorded about each before it is used.

データ区分来歴を記録済み解像度を明示ライセンス確認済み
衛星画像、光学とレーダーセンサー、処理レベル、取得日画素サイズと再訪周期シーンごと
再解析と気候モデルの出力モデル、実験、メンバー、バージョングリッドと時間ステップリリースごと
現地センサーと計測器観測所、機器、校正記録地点とサンプリング・レートネットワークごと
人口と資産のエクスポージャー手法、作成年、入力ソースセルの大きさと単位リリースごと
境界と参照地理作成者、版、日付縮尺版ごと
系譜
情報源から図までの W3C PROV 記録
原則
FAIR:見つけやすく、アクセス可能で、相互運用でき、再利用できる
ギャップ
欠損として表示し、黙って埋めることはしない
データの分類と、それぞれに記録される来歴項目。データセットは、そのライセンスが利用を認めて初めて、名称で掲載されます。
FAIR 原則・GO FAIR と FORCE11W3C PROV・World Wide Web Consortium不確実性の一貫した扱いに関するガイダンス・IPCCCEOS 解析即応データ・地球観測衛星委員会
04In the five domains

Status records keep each domain’s work honest about what exists.

05プロセス

プロセスの進め方。

プロセス

Programme status: Edition from scope to correction

Each country agrees profile scope before Q1; G6 authorises release, and a correction is a new version, never a silent change.

  1. 01 Scope and draft

    1. 01Profile scope agreed before Q1Record · The country programmeEach country agrees its profile scope before Q1, and nothing outside it is published. Regional profiles never override a country’s findings.
    2. 02起草中Step · Series editorsSeries editors lead each edition under the series method. National Working Groups draft country-edition sections for review.
    3. 03Evidence cutoff and labels記録Each edition states its evidence cutoff. Observed, modelled and estimated evidence stay apart.
  2. 02 レビュー

    1. 04Review on methodGate · Qualified, conflict-managed reviewersFindings are accepted on method by conflict-managed reviewers. The review may send the draft back for revision.
    2. 05公開安全性レビューゲートPublic-safe review is the gate before any release. A report may be cleared for limited circulation or for publication.
  3. 03 Authorise and release

    1. 06G6 · 公開の承認ゲート・Global Risks ForumGRF は、科学的審査と編集審査を通過した結果の公開を承認します。個人データを公開することはできません。
    2. 07Release with identifiers記録・ReportsEvery edition carries a DataCite persistent identifier and a UNI under NS-1. The programme publishes one edition each quarter.
  4. 04 Correct

    1. 08Correction as a new versionStep · ReportsA correction produces a new version of an edition. The earlier version stays on record with the correction history.

報告書 · The programme year · Identifiers and recordsDesigned programme process, not a record of operation. No cycle has run and every programme is at service level R0. A gate is a programme decision, never a public-authority approval, certification or deployment authorisation. No edition has been released and none is on record.

06指標

何を、どの程度うまく測定しているか。

各指標には、その単位、更新頻度、背後にある出典の種類、値が持つことになるエビデンスのラベルが付いています。値は表示しません:プログラムが自らの権限のもとで値を提供します。

指標単位周期出典の種類ラベル
Programme records with a named status ownershare of programme records四半期ごとRegistry record audit観測
Time since last attested status change日継続的Record timestamps観測
Owner attestation currencyshare of records attested within the review cycle四半期ごとSteward attestations申告済み
Status assertions with linked evidenceshare of status assertions月次Evidence link check観測
Status vocabulary conformanceshare of records using the controlled list月次Schema validation観測
Agreement with funder award recordsshare of programmes matching the funder’s status年次Funder grant records公表統計
Planned against reported milestone completionratio of reported to planned milestonesper milestoneProgramme reports報告値
Status changes later reversed or correctedcount per reporting period四半期ごとCorrection trail観測
07出典

エビデンスの出所。

名前の明示された公開データセットと機関の記録。それぞれにライセンス区分があります。合意に基づく出典は、その条件のもとでのみ使用し、再公開することはありません。

出典提供するものライセンス区分
IATI Standard and its activity status codelistMachine-readable programme records from development and humanitarian publishers, with a controlled list of activity statesOpen data, licence set by each publisher
CORDISProject records, participants, dates and reported results for EU-funded research and innovation programmesFree reuse with attribution under the European Commission reuse policy
NIH RePORTERAward records, project periods and linked publications for United States federally funded researchパブリックドメイン
UKRI Gateway to ResearchGrants, organisations, people and reported outcomes from UK Research and Innovationオープン・ガバメント・ライセンス
Crossref grant identifiersPersistent identifiers and metadata deposited by funders for individual awardsOpen metadata, no restrictions on reuse
Research Activity Identifier (RAiD, ISO 23527)A persistent identifier and metadata record for a project across its lifetime, linking people, organisations and outputsOpen metadata, terms of each registration agency
08決定

誰が決め、エビデンスが何に役立つか。

Registry prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

誰が決定するか質問このページが提供するエビデンス
Funders’ programme officersWhether to release the next tranche, extend or close an awardStatus with its attestation date, linked milestone evidence and agreement with the funder’s own award record
Programme stewards and boardsWhen to change a status, and who must confirm the changeStatus definitions, the evidence each state requires and the history of earlier changes
内部監査人と外部監査人Whether reported status matched the programme’s actual state over the audit periodTime-stamped status history, correction trail and the evidence linked at each change
Partner institutionsWhether to commit staff, data or co-funding to a programmeCurrent status with owner, scope boundaries and the difference between planned and delivered work

このトピックが生み出す成果物

  • A status glossary defining each programme state, what it asserts and what it does not
  • Programme record views showing the status owner, the date of last attestation and linked evidence
  • A status history for each programme with every change, its author and its stated reason
  • Crosswalks between partner status vocabularies and the controlled list
09中核となる問い

What experts ask about programme states.

  • What is the minimum evidence for each state, and who must hold it?
  • How can a vocabulary stay stable across institutions, languages and legal システム?
  • How should a status separate the existence of a programme from the quality of its work?
  • What happens to a status when its evidence lapses, is challenged or is withdrawn?
  • How are past states preserved so that history cannot be rewritten?
10メカニズム

Why status claims drift.

Status inflation is a well-documented pattern in programme reporting. Organisations describe intentions as commitments, memoranda as agreements and pilots as operations, often without bad faith, because incentives reward visible progress. Each restatement in a press release, slide or directory strips a little more context, until a programme in exploration is cited as active. The drift is compounded when different institutions use the same word for different things.

Records practice counters this with three disciplines: a controlled vocabulary with written definitions, a rule that each state is tied to a named type of evidence, and an append-only history so that every change is dated and attributable. The Registry applies these to its seven published states, from exploration to historical record, set out on プログラムの状態.

11手法と限界

How states are recorded, and what they cannot show.

  1. 01

    Controlled vocabulary

    Each state has a definition and a statement of what it does not mean, kept as a versioned glossary.

  2. 02

    Evidence binding

    A state is linked to the record that supports it, such as a constituting decision or a closeout record, with its issuer and date.

  3. 03

    Event history

    Changes are recorded as events, so the state on any past date can be reconstructed.

  4. 04

    限界

    A status shows formal standing, not effectiveness, quality or compliance. Evidence held privately can only be described, not shown, so readers rely on the issuer’s authority for it.

12手法

どのように研究され、手法が言えないことは何か。

  1. データエンジニアリング、相互運用性、データ・スチュワードシップスキーマ検証付きの取り込み · 永続識別子の照合 · パイプラインにおける系譜の記録ここでの適用
  2. デジタル ID と公共デジタル・システム発行者の認証と権限 · 本人による貢献者の識別ここでの適用
  3. サイバーセキュリティと暗号改ざんが検知できる記録の履歴 · 署名付きのエクスポートとリリース · 編集経路の脅威モデリングここでの適用
13Where this page’s references

Where this page’s references lead.

このページの読解の基準となる機関と文書。状態と版は変わります。各リンクは発行機関へ移動します。

14質問

質問と回答。

Does an active status mean a programme is delivering results?
No. Active means the accountable owner asserts the programme is in its delivery phase. Results need their own evidence, linked separately and labelled by class, and a reader should check both.
Who can change a programme’s status?
The programme’s named owner or steward, under the programme’s own rules. Each change is recorded with its author, date and reason, and earlier states stay visible in the history.
Why does a status carry a date of last attestation?
Because a status that has not been reviewed may no longer be true. The date lets a reader judge how current the assertion is, rather than assuming it was confirmed today.
How do partner status terms map to the registry’s list?
Through a published crosswalk. Where a partner term has no exact equivalent, the mapping is marked approximate, so counts that combine sources are read with that caution.
Does an active programme have approved findings?
No. Active means authorised work is under way within an agreed scope. Findings carry their own methods, review and uncertainty.
Can a country listing imply a programme exists there?
No. A country profile or a planned hub is not a constituted programme, and the Registry records only states backed by evidence.
What if a recorded state is wrong?
It is corrected as a new version, with the reason and the date, under the rules described in correction and versioning.
報告書貢献する

このページからエビデンスを提供する。

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

GCRI登録簿手法と技術
登録簿

手法、データセット、または問いを持ち込んでください。

情報提供と問い合わせは本日から受け付けています。問い合わせには参照番号が付き、次の手順が示されます。申請、支払い、計算資源の割り当て、登録は、担当チーム、規約、審査体制が整ってから開始します。

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.