GCRI · Registry
프로그램 현황
A programme status such as planned, active, paused or closed is a short word that readers take as a long claim. They infer funding, staffing, delivery and even results from it, though the word asserts none of these on its own. This page sets out what a status assertion records, who may make and change it, how statuses drift away from the programme they describe, and what a funder, auditor or partner needs to see before relying on one.
일이 진행되는 방식.
기록 원장
Programme status · Registry · Ledger head 4520089
- 등록된 기록3446
- 출처 이력 완비, 기록 %93정상
- 미결 정정15주시
- 권리 보류0정보
최신 기록
| NX-R-20740 | 프로그램 현황 | v2 | 3557271 | 등록됨 |
| NX-P-99526 | 발행 | v1 | 9568898 | 등록됨 |
| NX-E-98224 | 근거 기록 | v2 | 2471930 | 정정 진행 중 |
| NX-C-85422 | 참여 | v1 | 7123058 | 권리 보류 |
버전 이력
- v1NEW출처와 함께 등록됨
- v2FIX단위 정정, 사유 기록됨
- v3OPEN정정 요청됨
그림Record ledger: example names and illustrative values, not a record or a live system.
Programme status: how the risk develops.
What a programme state does and does not mean. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.
Status outlives its evidence
A status is set at one moment and then left. Staff move, funding lapses or a phase ends, but the record still reads active. Without a review date and a named owner, an unchanged status cannot be told apart from a confirmed one.
Target read as delivery
Registries often hold planned scope beside actual progress. When a design target, a launch announcement or a pilot sits under the same status as an operating service, readers take intention for implementation, and implementation for a verified outcome.
Vocabulary drift
Each partner uses its own words: open, live, ongoing, in delivery. When records are merged without a controlled list and a crosswalk, one status means different things in different rows, and counts across the registry stop being comparable.
Reliance cascades
Funders schedule tranches, partners commit staff and reviewers cite the programme as evidence of capacity, all from the status field. A stale or inflated status therefore travels into budgets, reputations and later audit findings far from where it was entered.
How programme status is modelled, measured and tested.
모형, 그 가정, 데이터, 불확실성을 과학자나 엔지니어가 확인할 형태로 제시합니다. 구조는 발행된 방법을 따릅니다. 제시된 값은 예시이며 결과가 아닙니다.
데이터셋과 출처 이력
The data classes behind programme status and what is recorded about each before it is used.
| 데이터 등급 | 출처 기록됨 | 해상도 명시 | 라이선스 확인됨 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 위성 영상, 광학 및 레이더 | 센서, 처리 수준, 획득 일자 | 화소 크기와 재방문 주기 | 장면별 |
| 재분석과 기후 모형 산출물 | 모형, 실험, 멤버, 버전 | 격자와 시간 간격 | 배포마다 |
| 현장 센서와 계측기 | 관측소, 장비, 교정 기록 | 지점과 표본 추출률 | 네트워크별 |
| 인구 및 자산 노출 | 방법, 연도, 입력 출처 | 셀 크기와 단위 | 배포마다 |
| 경계와 기준 지리 | 생산자, 판, 날짜 | 축척 | 판별 |
- 계보
- 출처에서 그림까지의 W3C PROV 기록
- 원칙
- FAIR: 찾을 수 있고, 접근 가능하며, 상호운용 가능하고, 재사용 가능한
- 격차
- 누락으로 표시하며, 결코 조용히 채우지 않음
Status records keep each domain’s work honest about what exists.
- 물실제로는A basin study listed as planned is not shown as under way.What a reader can checkStatus and the record behind it
- 보건실제로는A surveillance analytics capability is described by purpose until verified.What a reader can checkVerification evidence
- 에너지실제로는A grid study waiting for operator data says so.What a reader can checkBlocking dependency stated
Status records feed the Foundry 구축 및 준비도 시리즈. Each status would carry a contextual identifier under NS-9 of the proposed Nexus Standards; readiness is never authority or approval.
- Corrections where a status is wrong.
- Requests to see the record behind a status.
프로세스가 진행되는 방식.
절차
Programme status: Edition from scope to correction
Each country agrees profile scope before Q1; G6 authorises release, and a correction is a new version, never a silent change.
01 Scope and draft
- 01Profile scope agreed before Q1Record · The country programmeEach country agrees its profile scope before Q1, and nothing outside it is published. Regional profiles never override a country’s findings.
- 02초안 작성Step · Series editorsSeries editors lead each edition under the series method. National Working Groups draft country-edition sections for review.
- 03Evidence cutoff and labels기록Each edition states its evidence cutoff. Observed, modelled and estimated evidence stay apart.
02 검토
- 04Review on methodGate · Qualified, conflict-managed reviewersFindings are accepted on method by conflict-managed reviewers. The review may send the draft back for revision.
- 05공개 안전성 검토관문Public-safe review is the gate before any release. A report may be cleared for limited circulation or for publication.
03 Authorise and release
- 06G6 · 발행 승인관문 · Global Risks ForumGRF는 과학적 검토와 편집 검토를 통과한 결과의 발행을 승인합니다. 개인정보는 발행할 수 없습니다.
- 07Release with identifiers기록 · ReportsEvery edition carries a DataCite persistent identifier and a UNI under NS-1. The programme publishes one edition each quarter.
04 Correct
- 08Correction as a new versionStep · ReportsA correction produces a new version of an edition. The earlier version stays on record with the correction history.
보고서 · The programme year · Identifiers and recordsDesigned programme process, not a record of operation. No cycle has run and every programme is at service level R0. A gate is a programme decision, never a public-authority approval, certification or deployment authorisation. No edition has been released and none is on record.
측정되는 것과 그 정확도.
각 지표에는 단위, 주기, 그 뒤의 출처 종류, 값에 붙을 근거 표시가 있습니다. 값은 표시하지 않습니다. 값은 프로그램이 자체 권한으로 제공합니다.
| 지표 | 단위 | 주기 | 출처 유형 | 라벨 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Programme records with a named status owner | share of programme records | 분기별 | Registry record audit | 관측 |
| Time since last attested status change | 일 | 지속적 | Record timestamps | 관측 |
| Owner attestation currency | share of records attested within the review cycle | 분기별 | Steward attestations | 신고됨 |
| Status assertions with linked evidence | share of status assertions | 월별 | Evidence link check | 관측 |
| Status vocabulary conformance | share of records using the controlled list | 월별 | Schema validation | 관측 |
| Agreement with funder award records | share of programmes matching the funder’s status | 연간 | Funder grant records | 공표 통계 |
| Planned against reported milestone completion | ratio of reported to planned milestones | per milestone | Programme reports | 보고됨 |
| Status changes later reversed or corrected | count per reporting period | 분기별 | Correction trail | 관측 |
근거의 출처.
이름이 명시된 공개 데이터셋과 기관 기록으로, 각각 라이선스 등급이 있습니다. 협약에 따른 출처는 그 조건에 따라서만 사용하며 결코 재게시하지 않습니다.
| 출처 | 제공하는 것 | 라이선스 등급 |
|---|---|---|
| IATI Standard and its activity status codelist | Machine-readable programme records from development and humanitarian publishers, with a controlled list of activity states | Open data, licence set by each publisher |
| CORDIS | Project records, participants, dates and reported results for EU-funded research and innovation programmes | Free reuse with attribution under the European Commission reuse policy |
| NIH RePORTER | Award records, project periods and linked publications for United States federally funded research | 퍼블릭 도메인 |
| UKRI Gateway to Research | Grants, organisations, people and reported outcomes from UK Research and Innovation | Open Government Licence |
| Crossref grant identifiers | Persistent identifiers and metadata deposited by funders for individual awards | Open metadata, no restrictions on reuse |
| Research Activity Identifier (RAiD, ISO 23527) | A persistent identifier and metadata record for a project across its lifetime, linking people, organisations and outputs | Open metadata, terms of each registration agency |
누가 결정하며 근거는 무엇에 쓰이는지.
Registry prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.
| 결정 주체 | 질문 | 이 페이지가 제공하는 근거 |
|---|---|---|
| Funders’ programme officers | Whether to release the next tranche, extend or close an award | Status with its attestation date, linked milestone evidence and agreement with the funder’s own award record |
| Programme stewards and boards | When to change a status, and who must confirm the change | Status definitions, the evidence each state requires and the history of earlier changes |
| 내부 및 외부 감사인 | Whether reported status matched the programme’s actual state over the audit period | Time-stamped status history, correction trail and the evidence linked at each change |
| Partner institutions | Whether to commit staff, data or co-funding to a programme | Current status with owner, scope boundaries and the difference between planned and delivered work |
이 주제가 생산하는 산출물
- A status glossary defining each programme state, what it asserts and what it does not
- Programme record views showing the status owner, the date of last attestation and linked evidence
- A status history for each programme with every change, its author and its stated reason
- Crosswalks between partner status vocabularies and the controlled list
What experts ask about programme states.
- What is the minimum evidence for each state, and who must hold it?
- How can a vocabulary stay stable across institutions, languages and legal 시스템?
- How should a status separate the existence of a programme from the quality of its work?
- What happens to a status when its evidence lapses, is challenged or is withdrawn?
- How are past states preserved so that history cannot be rewritten?
Why status claims drift.
Status inflation is a well-documented pattern in programme reporting. Organisations describe intentions as commitments, memoranda as agreements and pilots as operations, often without bad faith, because incentives reward visible progress. Each restatement in a press release, slide or directory strips a little more context, until a programme in exploration is cited as active. The drift is compounded when different institutions use the same word for different things.
Records practice counters this with three disciplines: a controlled vocabulary with written definitions, a rule that each state is tied to a named type of evidence, and an append-only history so that every change is dated and attributable. The Registry applies these to its seven published states, from exploration to historical record, set out on 프로그램 상태.
How states are recorded, and what they cannot show.
- 01
Controlled vocabulary
Each state has a definition and a statement of what it does not mean, kept as a versioned glossary.
- 02
Evidence binding
A state is linked to the record that supports it, such as a constituting decision or a closeout record, with its issuer and date.
- 03
Event history
Changes are recorded as events, so the state on any past date can be reconstructed.
- 04
한계
A status shows formal standing, not effectiveness, quality or compliance. Evidence held privately can only be described, not shown, so readers rely on the issuer’s authority for it.
Where this page’s references lead.
이 페이지를 읽을 때 기준이 되는 기구와 문서. 상태와 판은 바뀌며, 각 링크는 발행 기구로 연결됩니다.
질문과 답변.
Does an active status mean a programme is delivering results?
Who can change a programme’s status?
Why does a status carry a date of last attestation?
How do partner status terms map to the registry’s list?
Does an active programme have approved findings?
Can a country listing imply a programme exists there?
What if a recorded state is wrong?
이 페이지에서 증거를 기여하십시오.
Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- 이메일게이트웨이 GW-GCRI이 페이지에서 보내기증거, 정정, 사례, 방법, 검토, 번역 또는 프로필 입력 자료. 이 페이지의 태그가 붙어 도착하므로, 이를 담당하는 편집자가 받게 됩니다.
- Zenodo개방형 예치기탁하고 커뮤니티에 제출하기ORCID iD로 Zenodo에 직접 기록을 게시한 뒤, 그곳의 Reports 커뮤니티에 제출하십시오. 큐레이터가 검토하며, DOI는 귀하의 것으로 남습니다.
- 보고서GCRI모든 기여 방법 보기기여 유형, 각각의 검토 방식, 받게 되는 크레디트, 라이선스, 그리고 절대 받지 않는 것.
개인정보, 민감한 인프라 세부 정보, 공유할 권리가 없는 자료는 절대 보내지 마십시오. 기여물은 사용 전에 검토됩니다. 기여물을 보낸다고 해서 저작자 지위나 편집 권한이 부여되지 않으며, 후원으로 조사 결과를 얻을 수 없습니다.
방법, 데이터세트 또는 질문을 가져오십시오.
정보와 문의는 오늘부터 열려 있습니다. 문의에는 참조 번호가 부여되고 다음 단계가 안내됩니다. 신청, 결제, 컴퓨팅 할당, 등록은 해당 팀, 약관, 심사 역량이 갖추어졌을 때만 열립니다.
법률 문서.
이 사이트의 지도, 데이터와 그림은 맥락과 일반 정보로 제시됩니다. 조언, 예보 또는 경보가 아니며, 정보의 한계는 면책 고지와 데이터 고지에 나와 있습니다.