Readings from the other desks

The infrastructure and logistics baseline is read through each steward’s lens, then once as a whole. Each lens is a projection of reviewed findings, not a separate argument. The other desks’ own editions of this subject are listed first, as cross-references, not copies.

16 min read0 figures8 tables43 notesNR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

Contents

6.1The other desks’ editions of this subject

Federation: each desk writes its own edition for the subjects in its remit. Until a desk releases, its edition shows its frame and the reading this edition printed for it.

Desk	Edition	State
GCRI Systems Evidence	No edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycle	Not in this cycle
GRF Public Deliberation	Outside this desk’s remit	Not in remit
GRA Capital Readiness	No edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycle	Not in this cycle
Standards Progress	No edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycle	Not in this cycle
Academy Capability	No edition of this subject at this desk in the 2026 Baseline cycle	Not in this cycle
Index Measurement	Outside this desk’s remit	Not in remit

6.2Three lenses

One edition, read by each steward. The lens of this site comes first.

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports reading infrastructure as the carrier layer of the WEFH+B system. Trade volumes are high, routes are longer and chokepoints can fail within days. Evidence is strongest for trade, ports and road deaths, and weakest for asset condition and recovery times.

TRD-001 · TRD-002 · INF-004 · SYS-012

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people infrastructure risk arrives as a delayed delivery, a closed road or a dropped connection. The baseline asks that public debate treat transport and logistics as shared infrastructure for health and food, and keep the 1.19 million road deaths and the 2 billion people offline in view.

HLT-008 · DAT-009 · TRD-002

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. The need estimate is dated, port and network risks are modelled in the hundreds of billions, and freight and insurance costs repriced in 2026²¹¹⁶². These show where finance-readiness evidence will matter. Nothing here is advice, a rating or an approval.

FIN-007 · TRD-006

NEXUS

Synthesis

Infrastructure is well measured at the level of trade volumes and port traffic and thinly measured at the level of asset condition, maintenance and recovery. The 2027 programme should test the compound chokepoint case, bind regional corridor evidence and build the condition register.

SYS-012 · L-01 · L-02

6.3Standards, Academy and steward contributions

How the Nexus Standards drafts, the Risk Academy and the three stewards feed each quarterly edition for infrastructure and logistics. The standards are a preparatory working draft (2026) and are cited as drafts, never as adopted standards.

Table 6.1The quarterly rhythm every edition follows
Quarter	Edition	Question	Boundary
Q1	State and Agenda	What matters this year, and what is the starting position?	observed baseline stays distinct from planned work
Q2	Evidence and Build	What new evidence and capability exist?	a configured capability is not a validated result
Q3	Stress Test and Readiness	What do scenarios and tests show?	simulated loss or performance is not observed impact
Q4	Annual Synthesis and Renewal	What changed in the year, and what renews?	release follows review, not event publicity deadlines

Table 6.2Who contributes what each quarter
Steward or body	Role	Contribution route
The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI Canada)	Lead Institution and Consortium Secretariat; publisher of record; technical truth (key T)	science and practice communities · GCRI gateway
The Global Risks Forum (GRF)	leadership, dialogue and the Universe programme; public meaning (key M)	policy, Universe and national adoption · GRF gateway
The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)	finance, insurance and development readiness; capital meaning (key F)	finance and insurance · GRA gateway
Nexus Standards	preparatory drafts on vocabulary, hazards, indicators and methods	Standards site · working groups HAZ, IND, MTH, FIN, AI
Risk Academy	learning pathways tied to the agenda questions	Academy gateway · learning by review
Reports sector desks	infrastructure chapter inputs: GCRI evidence, GRA readiness, NXS standards, RA capability	sector editorial board

Standards drafts used in this edition

Risk vocabulary NRS-C1 (424 terms) for terms in the glossary
Hazard atlas NHS-1 1.1.0 (905 hazards in 120 families) for risk objects
Seven risk classes: global, catastrophic, existential, emerging, planetary, exponential, frontier-tech

Standards calendar to watch

Founding calls from 20 October 2026; working groups meet from 5 November 2026
Inaugural Global Standards Council session, 12 January 2027
Quarterly reviews in March, June, September and December, aligned with each edition

6.4GCRI reading: the model card

GCRI’s reading of this edition is its model card: what the national model is, what it computes and where it stops. It is printed in full in Annex A, with the methods it belongs to. Annex A, methodology

6.5Global Risks Forum reading: editorial essays

Four signed essays by the Reports editorial team set out the positions this edition takes. They are interpretation, labelled as such; the evidence they draw on is in the findings register.

Every recent shock has travelled on a network: fuel on tankers, fertiliser on bulk ships, data on cables and medicines on roads. Treating infrastructure as a list of assets understates how it moves risk between systems. This edition asks where a failed link sends the shock next.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 01

Infrastructure is a carrier, not a sector

The average voyage grew from 4,831 to 5,245 miles between 2018 and 2024 and ton-miles grew almost three times faster than volumes in 2024. Longer routes mean more fuel, more days and more exposure. Measuring distance as well as tonnage is the first adaptation.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 02

Distance is a hidden cost

Global expected damage to road and rail is small against output, but reaches 0.5 to 1% of GDP in some countries, and island economies depend most on their ports. The risk is a matter of where an economy has no second route.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 03

Hazards fall unevenly

Missing vulnerability assessments, dated investment estimates and thin condition data are quieter than a closed strait. They decide how large the next failure will be. Closing them is part of resilience.

EDITORIAL ESSAY · 04

The slow gaps matter

6.6Global Risks Alliance reading: 2027 infrastructure and logistics readiness pack

The registers that open the 2027 global cycle. At baseline each is initialised from this edition.

Table 6.32027 infrastructure and logistics readiness pack
Item	Register	State at baseline	First 2027 entry
E1	Infrastructure and Logistics risk state delta	baseline set by this edition	changes against the baseline
E2	WEFH+B state delta	five global system readings set	indicator updates and freshness
E3	Agenda and Portfolio movement	eight agenda items · 6 proposed objects	admission decisions
E4	Federation delivery register	national chapters in preparation	national chapters
E5	Consortium capability register	national consortia forming	first contributions
E6	Leadership questions and challenges	none yet	first challenge log
E7	Foundry technical state	national environments prepared	first federation cut
E8	Publication candidates	twelve findings carried forward	PUBLISH · HOLD dispositions
E9	Universe readiness	one candidate mission	admission and role spine
E10	Correction register	none	first federation-wide cycle

Publication dispositions

Publish
Hold
Needs evidence
Restricted
Superseded

6.7Nexus Standards reading: standards and regulatory watch

Instruments and published guidance that shape the systems in this edition, by status on the retrieval date. Nexus Standards texts that relate to this edition are cited as preparatory working draft (2026). The edition assesses no one’s compliance.

IN FORCE
ADOPTED
DEFERRED
PUBLISHED · VOLUNTARY

Table 6.4Standards and regulatory watch
Instrument	Body	Scope	Status	Relevance
Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 on the trans-European transport network²⁴	European Union	EU	IN FORCE	network completion
Directive (EU) 2022/2555, NIS2²⁵	European Union	EU	IN FORCE	cybersecurity
Directive (EU) 2022/2557 on the resilience of critical entities³⁹	European Union	EU	IN FORCE	resilience
IMO strategy on greenhouse gas emissions from ships²⁶	IMO	global	ADOPTED 2023	shipping emissions
IMO Net-Zero Framework²⁷⁴⁰	IMO	global	ADOPTION DEFERRED 2025	fuel intensity and pricing
ISO 55000 asset management⁴¹	ISO	global	PUBLISHED · VOLUNTARY	assets
ISO 28000 supply chain security management⁴²	ISO	global	PUBLISHED · VOLUNTARY	supply chains
ISO 22301 business continuity⁴³	ISO	global	PUBLISHED · VOLUNTARY	continuity
International Ship and Port Facility Security Code⁴⁸	IMO	global	IN FORCE	security

Changed since 2024

The IMO meeting of October 2025 deferred adoption of the Net-Zero Framework for one year²⁷
NIS2 repealed the earlier network and information security directive from 18 October 2024²⁵
UNCTAD published a rapid analysis of the Strait of Hormuz on 10 March 2026²

To watch in 2027

Outcome of the October 2026 IMO session on the Net-Zero Framework⁴⁰
National designation of critical entities in transport under the EU resilience directive³⁹
Completion of the core network of the trans-European transport network, due by 2030²⁴

6.8Risk Academy reading: literature and evidence review, science and assessments

The review behind this edition covers infrastructure and logistics assessments, peer-reviewed science and the institutional reports that bind its findings. Systematic reviews for each agenda item begin in 2027.

Review protocol

Question: What does the published evidence establish about the world’s infrastructure, transport and logistics systems and its couplings?
Sources searched: agency flagships; regulator and investigation reports; peer-reviewed port and network risk literature; statistics
Window: releases available at evidence close, 30 September 2026
Selection: sources that bind or contextualise a finding in this edition
Next step: systematic reviews for agenda items 01 to 05 in 2027

Table 6.5Peer-reviewed science and assessments
Reference	Type	Year	Role	Used for
Koks et al.¹⁵	journal article	2019	supports	road and rail exposure
Verschuur et al.¹⁸	journal article	2022	supports	port criticality
Verschuur et al.¹⁷	journal article	2023	supports	multi-hazard port risk
Verschuur et al.¹⁶	journal article	2023	supports	climate-related downtime
Thacker et al.¹⁹	journal article	2019	framework	infrastructure and the SDGs
IPCC AR6 Working Group II, Chapter 6³⁰	assessment	2022	context	key infrastructure and cities
Colon et al.⁴⁶	journal article	2020	context	transport network criticality
Verschuur et al.⁴⁷	journal article	2020	context	port disruption by natural disasters

Table 6.6Institutional flagships
Reference	Issuer	Year	Role	Used for
Review of Maritime Transport 2025¹	UNCTAD	2025	supports	trade, fleet, chokepoints
Strait of Hormuz Disruptions²	UNCTAD	2026	supports	chokepoint shock
Lifelines¹⁴	World Bank	2019	supports	disruption cost
Global status report on road safety 2023¹¹	WHO	2023	supports	road deaths
Facts and Figures 2026¹⁰	ITU	2026	supports	connectivity
Global Energy Review 2026¹³	IEA	2026	supports	transport fuels
Review of Maritime Transport 2024⁴⁹	UNCTAD	2024	context	maritime chokepoints
Transport Outlook 2023³⁴	ITF at the OECD	2023	context	demand and emissions
Resilience Pays³⁶	UNDRR	2025	context	disaster finance

Table 6.7Statistics, access and finance
Reference	Issuer	Year	Role	Used for
SDG Extended Report, Goal 9⁵	UN DESA	2026	supports	freight, finance, coverage
World Development Indicators⁶⁷⁸⁹	World Bank	2026	supports	ports, air, Internet, urbanisation
Global Infrastructure Outlook²¹	Global Infrastructure Hub	2017	supports	investment need
Infrastructure Report Card²⁰	ASCE	2025	context	United States condition
Air travel demand update²⁸	ACI World	2025	supports	airport passengers
Industry outlook²⁹	IATA	2025	supports	airline passengers
Air transport statistics³⁵	ICAO	2025	context	airline passengers
Logistics Performance Index³⁷	World Bank	2023	context	logistics performance

Table 6.8Regulators, safety and standards
Reference	Issuer	Year	Role	Used for
Key Bridge investigation²²	NTSB	2024	supports	structure failure
Transport Threat Landscape²³	ENISA	2023	supports	cyber incidents
Trans-European Transport Network²⁴	European Commission	2026	context	network rules
NIS2 Directive²⁵	European Commission	2026	context	cybersecurity duties
Resilience of critical entities directive³⁹	European Union	2022	context	critical entities
GHG strategy²⁶	IMO	2023	context	shipping emissions
Net-Zero Framework decision²⁷⁴⁰	IMO and DNV	2025	context	deferral
ISO 55000, 28000 and 22301⁴¹⁴²⁴³	ISO	2019 to 2024	context	asset, supply chain and continuity management
ISPS Code⁴⁸	IMO	2004	context	port and ship security
Rural Access Index⁵⁰	World Bank	2023	context	rural road access

Where the evidence agrees

Seaborne trade volumes grew in 2024 and routes lengthened¹
Chokepoint disruption raises freight, fuel and insurance costs²³
A large share of road, rail and port assets is exposed to hazards¹⁵¹⁷

Where it is unsettled

How many people fly: airport and airline counts differ by method²⁸²⁹⁷
How much seaborne freight moves: the UNCTAD Review and the SDG indicator differ by basis¹⁵
How long the 2026 Hormuz disruption lasts, and how far transits recovered²⁴⁴

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

21Global Infrastructure Hub (ed.), Global Infrastructure Outlook, press release of 25 July 2017 (USD 94 trillion need to 2040, USD 97 trillion with SDG access targets, USD 18 trillion unfunded). Global Infrastructure Hub, Sydney. Observation year 2017. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
16Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Systemic risks from climate-related disruptions at ports, Nature Climate Change 13, 804 to 806, 2023 (abstract and introduction opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
2UNCTAD (ed.), Strait of Hormuz Disruptions: Implications for Global Trade and Development, rapid analysis dated 10 March 2026, from Clarksons Research, EIA, LSEG, Kpler and other data. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
24European Commission (ed.), Trans-European transport network (TEN-T), policy page on Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 (core network by 2030, extended core by 2040, comprehensive by 2050). Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
25European Commission (ed.), NIS2 Directive: securing network and information systems, policy page on Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (earlier directive repealed from 18 October 2024). Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Brussels. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
39UNVERIFIED, not opened: Directive (EU) 2022/2557 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the resilience of critical entities, Official Journal of the European Union, 2022; the legal text returned a challenge page and the transport scope is cited from a search summary. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
26IMO (ed.), Initial IMO GHG Strategy, hot topic page (notes that the 2023 strategy has been adopted). International Maritime Organization, London. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
27DNV (ed.), Decision on the IMO Net-Zero Framework delayed for one year, news item of 2025 on the second extraordinary session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee. DNV, Oslo. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
40UNVERIFIED, not opened: POST-CLOSE, context only: IMO (ed.), Marine Environment Protection Committee, extraordinary session of October 2025 and the session of October 2026 on the Net-Zero Framework; only the DNV summary [27] was opened. International Maritime Organization, London. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
41UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO 55000:2024, Asset management: vocabulary, overview and principles. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva; the page was blocked. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
42UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO 28000:2022, Security and resilience: security management systems for the supply chain. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva; the page was blocked. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
43UNVERIFIED, not opened: ISO 22301:2019, Security and resilience: business continuity management systems. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva; the page was blocked. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
48UNVERIFIED, not opened: IMO (ed.), International Ship and Port Facility Security Code, 2004 (SOLAS chapter XI-2), cited from memory. International Maritime Organization, London. Observation year 2004. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
15Koks, E.E. et al., A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets, Nature Communications 10, 2677, 2019 (abstract via Crossref). Springer Nature. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
18Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Ports’ criticality in international trade and global supply-chains, Nature Communications 13, 2022 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
17Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E., Hall, J.W. et al., Multi-hazard risk to global port infrastructure and resulting trade and logistics losses, Communications Earth and Environment 4, 2023 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
19Thacker, S. et al., Infrastructure for sustainable development, Nature Sustainability 2, 324 to 331, 2019 (abstract opened). Springer Nature. Observation year 2019. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
30IPCC, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Working Group II, Chapter 6: Cities, Settlements and Key Infrastructure (chapter PDF opened). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
46UNVERIFIED, not opened: Colon, C., Hallegatte, S. and Rozenberg, J., Criticality analysis of a country’s transport network via an agent-based supply chain model, Nature Sustainability 4, 209 to 215, 2021; bibliographic record read via Crossref, abstract not read. Springer Nature. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
47UNVERIFIED, not opened: Verschuur, J., Koks, E.E. and Hall, J.W., Port disruptions due to natural disasters: Insights into port and logistics resilience, Transportation Research Part D 85, 102393, 2020; bibliographic record read via Crossref, abstract not read. Elsevier. Observation year 2020. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
1UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2025: Staying the course in turbulent waters (full report and overview). UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
14Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J. and Rozenberg, J., Lifelines: The Resilient Infrastructure Opportunity. World Bank, Washington, 2019 (full report PDF). Observation year 2019 (analysis of earlier data). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
11WHO (ed.), Global status report on road safety 2023, Geneva, 13 December 2023 (publication page). World Health Organization, Geneva. Observation year 2021. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
10ITU (ed.), Measuring digital development: Facts and Figures 2026 (publication page with key findings). International Telecommunication Union, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
13IEA (ed.), Global Energy Review 2026 (PDF, opened from a copy of the published report hosted by a third party). International Energy Agency, Paris. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
49UNVERIFIED, not opened: UNCTAD (ed.), Review of Maritime Transport 2024: Navigating maritime chokepoints; named in the SDG 9 storyline [5], not opened. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
34UNVERIFIED, not opened: ITF (ed.), ITF Transport Outlook 2023. International Transport Forum at the OECD, Paris; the page returned an access error and no figure is used. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
36UNVERIFIED, not opened: UNDRR (ed.), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025, Resilience Pays: Financing and Investing for our Future; the page was not accessible and no figure from search summaries is used. UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
5UN DESA Statistics Division (ed.), The Sustainable Development Goals Extended Report 2026, Goal 9 indicator storylines (inputs as of 30 April 2026). United Nations, New York. Observation year 2024 (indicators 9.1.2 and 9.a.1) and 2025 (indicator 9.c.1). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
6DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, container port traffic (TEU), series IS.SHP.GOOD.TU, API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
7DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, air transport passengers carried and freight (series IS.AIR.PSGR and IS.AIR.GOOD.MT.K1, ICAO source) and rail series (no values returned), API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
8DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, individuals using the Internet (series IT.NET.USER.ZS, ITU source), API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
9DATA VINTAGE AFTER CLOSE: World Bank (ed.), World Development Indicators, urban population as a share of total population (series SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS, UN source), API read, database last updated 2026-10-08. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
20ASCE (ed.), 2025 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure (summary page: overall grade C, grades from B in ports to D in stormwater and transit, USD 3.6 trillion investment gap over ten years). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
28ACI World (ed.), Biannual global air travel demand update, 30 September 2025 (9.4 billion passengers in 2024; 9.8 billion projected for 2025). Airports Council International, Montreal. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
29IATA (ed.), Industry outlook press release, December 2025 (5.2 billion passengers expected in 2026, up 4.4% on 2025; cargo 71.6 million tonnes). International Air Transport Association, Montreal. Observation year 2026 (expectation). Accessed 2026-11-03.back
35UNVERIFIED, not opened: ICAO (ed.), Air transport statistics and The World of Air Transport; the site returned an access error and no figure from it is used. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal. Observation year 2025. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
37UNVERIFIED, not opened: World Bank (ed.), Connecting to Compete 2023: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, the Logistics Performance Index; the site was not accessible and no value is used. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
22NTSB (ed.), Contact of Containership Dali with Francis Scott Key Bridge and Subsequent Bridge Collapse, investigation page with probable cause and recommendations. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington. Observation year 2024. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
23ENISA (ed.), ENISA Transport Threat Landscape, March 2023 (publication page and report PDF; incidents January 2021 to October 2022). European Union Agency for Cybersecurity, Athens. Observation year 2022. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
50UNVERIFIED, not opened: World Bank (ed.), Rural Access Index, SDG indicator 9.1.1; the custodian storyline in the SDG Extended Report is empty and the index was not retrieved. World Bank, Washington. Observation year 2023. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
3UNCTAD (ed.), Hormuz shipping disruptions raise risks for energy, fertilisers and vulnerable economies, media alert UNCTAD/PRESS/MA/2026/003, Geneva, 10 March 2026. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back
44UNVERIFIED, not opened: UNCTAD (ed.), Strait of Hormuz tracking dashboard, launched April 2026; known only from search summaries. UN Trade and Development, Geneva. Observation year 2026. Accessed 2026-11-03.back

Cite this chapter

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Chapter 6: Readings from the other desks. In Global Infrastructure and Logistics Risk and Resilience Report 2026: Baseline Edition, The State of the World’s Infrastructure, Transport and Logistics. (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-SECTOR-INFRASTRUCTURE-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

Name	Purpose	Duration	Party
`wordpress_*`cookie	Strictly necessaryThis site	Until you sign out	First party
`wordpress_logged_in_*`cookie	Strictly necessaryThis site	Until you sign out, or 14 days	First party
`wordpress_sec_*`cookie	Strictly necessaryThis site	Until you sign out, or 14 days	First party
`wordpress_test_cookie`cookie	Strictly necessaryThis site	Session	First party
`wp-settings-*`cookie	Strictly necessaryThis site	1 year	First party
`wp-postpass_*`cookie	Strictly necessaryThis site	10 days	First party
`comment_author_*`cookie	Strictly necessaryThis site	About 347 days	First party
`wpEmojiSettingsSupports`browser storage	Strictly necessaryThis site	Session	First party
`nexus_consent`cookie	Strictly necessaryPrivacy choices	180 days	First party
`nexus_consent_id`cookie	Strictly necessaryPrivacy choices	180 days	First party
`nexus_consent_reset`cookie	Strictly necessaryPrivacy choices	Session	First party
`wp_consent_*`cookie	Strictly necessaryPrivacy choices	180 days	First party
`nexus_consent`browser storage	Strictly necessaryPrivacy choices	180 days	First party
`nx_theme`browser storage	Preferences and functionalDisplay preferences	Until you change it	First party
`nexus.theme.default`browser storage	Preferences and functionalDisplay preferences	Until you change it	First party
`bx-color-mode`browser storage	Preferences and functionalDisplay preferences	Until you change it	First party
`bx-color-mode-against`browser storage	Preferences and functionalDisplay preferences	Until you change it	First party
`nexus.embed.theme`browser storage	Preferences and functionalDisplay preferences	Until you change it	First party
`buddyx_dark_mode`browser storage	Preferences and functionalDisplay preferences	Until you change it	First party
`buddyx_color_mode_against`browser storage	Preferences and functionalDisplay preferences	Until you change it	First party
`nexus.a11y`browser storage	Preferences and functionalDisplay preferences	Until you change it	First party
`nexus.dock`browser storage	Preferences and functionalDisplay preferences	Until you change it	First party
`bp-activity`browser storage	Strictly necessaryCommunity directories (BuddyPress)	As the provider sets it	First party
`bp-groups`browser storage	Strictly necessaryCommunity directories (BuddyPress)	As the provider sets it	First party
`bp-members`browser storage	Strictly necessaryCommunity directories (BuddyPress)	As the provider sets it	First party
`bp-blogs`browser storage	Strictly necessaryCommunity directories (BuddyPress)	As the provider sets it	First party
`bp-messages`browser storage	Strictly necessaryCommunity directories (BuddyPress)	As the provider sets it	First party