Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

Methodology

How the edition was made: methods, the model card, the evidence cut and its age, the acceptance record and the glossary.

9 min read0 figures12 tables3 notesNR-COUNTRY-KEN-2026-BASELINE

Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. ·Executive summary
  3. 1Kenya’s risk runs between its rains and its grid
  4. 2Key findings
  5. 3Systems and sectors at baseline
  6. 4Risks and capability
  7. 5Failed rains, grid shortfall and outbreak in the arid counties
  8. 6Readings from the other desks
  9. 7The 2027 agenda
  10. 8Systems in depth
  11. AMethodology
    1. A.1 Methods
    2. A.2 Model card, National Model v0
    3. A.3 The baseline evidence cut
    4. A.4 Evidence age and coverage
    5. A.5 Evidence cards, two anchor sources
    6. A.6 Publication acceptance record
    7. A.7 Status words
    8. A.8 How the edition is made, released and corrected
    9. A.9 Glossary and abbreviations
    10. A.10 Technical annex
  12. BData appendix
  13. CReferences and record
  14. ·Complete edition, for print

A.1Methods

The baseline uses published values and four simple derivations. Each is shown in full so that any reader can reproduce it.

Table A.1Methods
No.DerivationCalculationResult
(1)Generation growth since FY2021/2215,692.81 ÷ 12,652.74 − 1≈ +24.0%
(2)2030 target level from the 2020 business-as-usual level143 × (1 − 0.32)≈ 97.24 Mt
(3)2035 level at 35% below business-as-usual215 × (1 − 0.35), minus the 2030 target level of 97.24≈ 139.75 Mt; ≈ 42.5 Mt above the 2030 level
(4)Geothermal energy curtailed, as a share of geothermal energy delivered392.36 ÷ 6,420.51≈ 6.1%
Table A.2Coupling strength scale (matrix and model card)
StrengthDefinition
STRONGa disruption in the source system has historically changed the target system’s service or output within one season
MODERATEan effect is documented but buffered or slower
WEAKan effect is plausible but not documented at national scale
Table A.3Status grammar
LabelRule
Reportedvalue as issued by its source, with year
Inferredreasoned from cited evidence; never a measurement
EstimatedNexus analytical value with stated method
Scenarioconditional on stated assumptions
Expert inputstructured editorial judgement awaiting evidence

A.2Model card, National Model v0

Model ID
MDL-KEN-NATIONAL · v0.1
Purpose
represent Kenya as coupled water, energy, food, health and biodiversity systems with forcing and transmission layers
Family
graph-based system of systems
Inputs
the cited sources of this edition; no proprietary data
Method
expert-specified coupling strengths (STRONG · MODERATE · WEAK) from evidence and analogue events
Validation
none yet, first validation against Q1 2027 Foundry evidence
Uncertainty
qualitative; strengths are hypotheses, not measurements
Domain of validity
national scale; not for county or asset-level use
Reproducibility
strength table and sources published in this edition
20couplings

typed in v0

9strong

documented within one season

7moderate

documented, buffered

4weak

plausible, undocumented

A.3The baseline evidence cut

Every Nexus edition is published from a frozen evidence cut. The baseline cut is documentary: it pins the exact edition of every source cited. Model runs begin with the first Foundry cut in Q1 2027.

Cut ID
NQ-KEN-2026-Q0-1
Type
baseline documentary cut
Resolution policy
pinned · as of 30 September 2026
Sources pinned
54 cited sources, each at the edition and retrieval date in the references
Model runs
none at baseline, analytical values are stated with their method
Digest
computed at freeze and recorded in the publication record
Supersedes
nothing, first cut of the series
Superseded by
NQ-KEN-2027-Q1-1 at the Q1 2027 close

Lineage

  1. 01

    source edition

  2. 02

    pinned citation

  3. 03

    finding

  4. 04

    page

  5. 05

    publication record

Table A.4From the baseline cut to the first Foundry cut
ElementBaseline 2026Q1 2027
Sourcescited publications, pinned by editionqualified source bindings with versions
Analysisstated methods and editorial estimatestyped analysis specifications
ModelsNational Model v0 specificationmodel runs with receipts
Findingstwelve baseline findingsfindings re-bound to the cut
Reviewfive passes scheduledfive passes on the exact digest

A.4Evidence age and coverage

A 2026 edition rests on evidence observed in many different years. This page shows each time base, so that no single year label hides older evidence.

Table A.5Evidence age and coverage
IndicatorObservedReleasedCadenceNext release
Population, life expectancy, services2024–2025World Bank, 2026 vintageannualnext vintage
GHG inventory2022Feb 2026biennialnext transparency report
2035 climate target2025Apr 2025periodicnext NDC cycle
Electricity statisticsFY2025/26Sep 2026annualbiannual report, Mar 2027
Food insecurity (IPC)Apr to Jun 2026May 2026periodicnext IPC update
Health emergenciesto 7 Jun 2026Jun 2026weeklyweekly
Agriculture output2025May 2026periodicEconomic Survey 2027
Flood deaths and households2024Aug 2025per eventper event
Protected areas20252026 vintageannualnext vintage
Table A.6Coverage by system at baseline
SystemCoverageThinnest dimension
Climate forcingPARTIALrainfall extremes by county; sector emissions
EnergyPARTIALreservoir storage; import contracts
FoodPARTIALhousehold survey; maize in tonnes
HealthPARTIALwater-related illness; census counts
WaterTHINstorage, flow and utility performance
BiodiversityTHINthreat status and condition
FinanceTHINinsured share of loss
DigitalTHINdependency mapping

A.5Evidence cards, two anchor sources

Issued by the Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority. Annual, year to 30 June 2026. Role: binds ENE-003, ENE-004 and the generation chart; read in full.

EVD-KEN-001

EPRA statistics report FY2025/2625

Issued under the UNFCCC, report FCCC/ETF/TERR.1/2024/KEN, 13 February 2026. Periodic. Role: binds CLI-001 and the target level; read in full.

EVD-KEN-002

Technical expert review of the first transparency report27

Table A.7Quality dimensions at baseline
DimensionEVD-KEN-001EVD-KEN-002
Completenessall generation, capacity and loss seriesinventory 1990–2022, all sectors
Timelinessabout 3 months after year endabout 38 months after the inventory year
Revisionprior-year values restated in each reportback-revised with each inventory
Method transparencydefinitions stated in the reportreview methodology published
External validationnot stated in the reportUN technical review in May 2025

Evidence cards to follow in Q1 2027

  • EPRA biannual report, March 202725
  • Kenya transparency report main document and inventory report27
  • IPC analysis for the October to December 2026 season32
  • National biodiversity assessment or IUCN country records, for threat status

A.6Publication acceptance record

Editorial self-check at evidence close. Every applicable item carries a disposition; the remaining items are review, approval and deposit.

Table A.8Publication acceptance record
GroupAreaItemsPassN/APending
D1Identity and scope8800
D2Source and data12912
D3Analysis and models12381
D4Findings and claims9801
D5Figures, tables, maps10622
D6Editorial and citations10802
D7Review and approval130013
D8Artefact and design12705
D9Registry and release9009

Publication gate

Conditions met
14 of 23 at evidence close
Blocking problems
none recorded
Open conditions
reviews, approval of the exact digest, deposit, registry pointer

Not applicable at baseline

Model runs
first runs in Q1 2027
Maps
plates in Q2 2027
Waivers
none

A.7Status words

Table A.9The status every value carries
StatusWhat it means
ObservedMeasured directly and published by the source.
ReportedPublished statistics of an official or institutional source.
DeclaredStated by the body concerned; not independently measured.
EstimatedA Nexus estimate from cited evidence, with its method in Annex A.
ModelledProduced by a stated model from cited inputs.
InferredReasoned from cited evidence; not measured.
ForecastA projection by the cited source.
SimulatedA simulation result under stated assumptions.
ScenarioA conditional statement under stated assumptions; never a prediction.
Expert inputExpert judgement, recorded with its basis.
CandidateProposed for a later edition; not yet evidence.
Evidence-quality levels (EQL 1 to 5) grade the source behind a value; they are not a score of the subject.

A.8How the edition is made, released and corrected

Every edition is built from a sealed evidence cut, reviewed under three keys, signed and deposited before any site shows it as published; corrections go to Nexus Standards as change proposals and feed the next cut.

StepWhat happensSource
01 Evidence arrives from the pillarsFoundry seals observations and indicator series, Universe hands over after-action and scenario findings, and contributions are screened at every gateway, including this site’s.
02 The cut is sealedOn the cut date the evidence is pinned under one identifier, so anyone can rebuild the edition from exactly what it was built on.
03 The edition is assembledThe edition is drafted from its template and content pack. Agents may draft; they never publish and never decide.
04 The keys turnAt the publisher of record the truth key comes first: every value is checked against its source or stated method before the meaning and capital keys turn. No edition moves on until every key has been turned by a named steward.
05 The gate opensA named approver releases one exact digest of the edition; any change after this point is a new version, never a silent edit.
06 Signed and depositedThe PDF, the web edition and the data bundle are signed together with a manifest and an RO-Crate description, and deposited on Zenodo with a concept and a version DOI.
07 Published on its desk’s siteOnly then does the edition show as published on its desk’s Reports site, and the Collection lists it as a part.
08 Corrections go to StandardsMethod and correction findings go to Nexus Standards as change proposals; citations, corrections and new contributions feed the next evidence cut.

A teaching model of the process, not a forecast and not a record of any run; dates and counts on this page come from the programme record. Sources: Reports governance at GCRI Canada (2026); Zenodo, repository of record for Reports deposits (2026).

Lifecycle, one state at a time: Draft, Computed, Evidence bound, Reviewed, Approved for release, Published, Corrected, Superseded. This edition is a draft.

A.9Glossary and abbreviations

Table A.10Series terms
TermMeaning
Baseline Editionthe inaugural annual edition that fixes the reference state for the series
WEFH+Bwater, energy, food, health and biodiversity, the national nexus core
Couplinga typed dependency through which one system transmits to another
Protection gapthe share of losses not covered by insurance
Capability ladderLISTED → EXISTS → ADEQUATE → TESTED → DEMONSTRATED
EQLevidence-quality level, 1–5
Evidence cuta frozen resolution of exact sources and versions
NNC · NLC · NWGNational Nexus Consortium · National Leadership Council · National Working Groups
Table A.11Abbreviations used in this edition
AbbreviationExpansion
ASALarid and semi-arid lands
BAUbusiness as usual
CBKCentral Bank of Kenya
EPRAEnergy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority
FAOFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
GIEWSGlobal Information and Early Warning System
IFRCInternational Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
IMFInternational Monetary Fund
IPCIntegrated Food Security Phase Classification
KNBSKenya National Bureau of Statistics
NDCnationally determined contribution
TERTtechnical expert review team
WDIWorld Development Indicators
WHO AFROWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Africa

A.10Technical annex

Table A.12Technical annex
ItemAnnexContentsStatus
A.1Indicator definitionsthe baseline indicator set, with units and sourcesIN THIS EDITION
A.2Coupling strengthsthe twenty-cell matrix and its rationaleIN THIS EDITION
A.3Scenario specificationSCN-KEN-DRT-01 assumptions and signpostsIN THIS EDITION
A.4Capability placementsrung evidence for fifteen functionsIN THIS EDITION
A.5Model diagnosticsfirst runs and validationQ1 2027
A.6Sensitivity analysesinfluence of coupling strengthsQ2 2027
A.7County notesatlas cards for every countyQ2 2027
A.8Review statementspass-by-pass review recordAT RELEASE

A.1 · indicator definition, system losses

Construct
electrical energy lost in transmission and distribution, technical and commercial, as a share of energy supplied
Unit
percent of energy
Scope
the interconnected national system, year to 30 June
Source
EPRA statistics report FY2025/2625
Revision
restated in each annual report
Known limits
the allowable level of 16.5% is the regulator’s benchmark, not a technical minimum

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 25Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (ed.), Energy and Petroleum Statistics Report for the year ended 30th June 2026. EPRA, Nairobi, September 2026, observation year FY2025/26, accessed 2026-11-03.back
  2. 27UNFCCC (ed.), Report on the technical expert review of the first biennial transparency report of Kenya, FCCC/ETF/TERR.1/2024/KEN. UNFCCC, Bonn, 13 February 2026, observation year 2022, accessed 2026-11-03.back
  3. 32Food and Agriculture Organization (ed.), GIEWS Country Brief: Kenya, reference date 4 May 2026. FAO, Rome, 2026, accessed 2026-11-03.back

Cite this annex

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Annex A: Methodology. In Kenya Systems Risk and Resilience Report 2026: The State of Kenya’s Interdependent Systems (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-COUNTRY-KEN-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Kenya.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, written by six desks. This page sits with the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) Systems Evidence desk. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work. Sent to the wrong desk, it is forwarded, not refused.

GCRI Systems Evidence deskCountry Systems Risk and Resilience

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation

Science · evidence · measurement

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GCRI is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.